In a provocative ad now airing on television and radio, U.S. Senate candidate Jack Kingston tries to tie his Republican runoff opponent, businessman David Perdue, to President Barack Obama.
An Obama impersonator leaves a faux voicemail for Kingston, asking him to “ease up” on Perdue because “he’s my kind of guy.”
Perdue and Kingston, a veteran U.S. congressman from Savannah, are locked in a heated Republican runoff to be the party’s nominee to succeed retiring U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss. In November, the winner of the July 22 runoff faces Democrat Michelle Nunn.
In his ad, Kingston claims one of “Perdue’s companies” took $3 million from the federal stimulus program that Obama created to jump-start the economy. Kingston opposed the stimulus, and some critics say it was a waste of taxpayer money.
But is the claim about a Perdue company taking stimulus money true? Or is it more rhetoric than reality? PolitiFact Georgia wanted to know.
Kingston is hardly the first candidate to try to discredit an opponent with claims of connections to the president or to one of Obama’s polarizing initiatives – mainly, the health care overhaul, commonly known as Obamacare, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, better known as the “stimulus plan.”
In 2012, Mark Neumann, the leading tea party candidate in Wisconsin’s GOP Senate primary, was on the defensive after acknowledging that his company took $80,000 in stimulus money. He lost the primary to former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson.
In his ad, Kingston is referring to $3.4 million in stimulus that went to Alliant Energy Co., a Midwest energy holding company that reported $3.2 billion in operating revenue in 2013.
Perdue, best known for his leadership of Dollar General, has been on Alliant’s board of directors since 2001, earning about $1.3 million in directors fees, according to records of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Last year, Perdue reported making between $2.1 million and $8.1 million from investment income and corporate board memberships. At the time, in addition to Alliant’s board, he was serving on the board of Sandy Springs-based Graphic Packaging International Inc., California-based Easton-Bell Sports Inc. and Washington-based Liquidity Services Inc.
Kingston spokesman Chris Crawford said this week that Perdue has acknowledged in the past that he knew of the stimulus grants to Alliant.
“If he was aware, why didn’t he take action to stop them?” Crawford said. “If he didn’t take an ownership role in leading the company, why did he take $1 million from the company?”
Perdue campaign spokesman Derrick Dickey said the ad is representative of “the kind of false and misleading accusations we have come to expect” from Kingston.
Perdue didn’t receive any stimulus money personally and neither did any company he managed, Dickey said.
He said Perdue doesn’t recall any board of directors vote at Alliant on the stimulus money and isn’t a fan of that initiative.
“David believes that overall, like most spending by Washington politicians, the stimulus was a waste of taxpayer money that missed its mark while piling on even more debt,” Dickey said.
(Perdue’s campaign has stressed the need to reduce the federal debt and has a running debt clock on its website.)
We attempted to contact Alliant to see whether we could review the minutes of the board of directors’ meetings, specifically to see whether there were discussions and/or votes on the stimulus money. We didn’t receive an immediate response.
We also reached out to Robert S. Chirinko, a professor at the University of Illinois who specializes in corporate governance issues. We asked him about the fairness of an ad suggesting that the stimulus money went to “one of Perdue’s companies” when his role at Alliant is as a member of the board of directors.
Members of a board of directors “are merely the trustees of the company and they represent the shareholders’ interests,” he said.
“In principle, the board makes sure the shareholders/owners get treated fairly and applicable laws and regulations are followed. It could well be the case that the board was not involved in the decision to accept stimulus money.”
With a major company the size of Alliant, “$3.4 million may fly below the board’s radar screen,” Chirinko said.
The Kingston ad mentions the $3 million in stimulus funds. But the Kingston camp says much more stimulus money went to Alliant or its affiliates. The company’s 2012 annual report shows that it has three wind farms that took at least $64 million in stimulus-provided production tax credits and another that took a $62.4 million stimulus cash grant, Crawford said.
The Hill also has reported that Graphic Packaging, another company that has Perdue on its board, received a $500,000 stimulus grant.
Perdue’s camp suggests Kingston has questions of his own to answer about the stimulus.
Dickey points out that Kingston voted against the stimulus but lobbied for and put out press releases about money being received.
In summary, the ad makes the claim that one of Perdue’s companies took stimulus money. Perdue sat on four boards, including Alliant. That’s a lot different than owning, running or working day to day for a company. We think it’s misleading to say Alliant is his company in an attempt to link him to the president’s stimulus program.
It is a company with which he has an affiliation, so there is a bit of truth here, but just a bit.
We rate the attack ad statement as Mostly False.
Support real journalism. Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today. See offers.
Your subscription to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution funds in-depth reporting and investigations that keep you informed. Thank you for supporting real journalism.
This article was edited for length. To see a complete version, go to www.politifact.com/georgia/.