This year, refugee resettlement agencies in Georgia have welcomed just over 1,000 people, though that number has dropped since Trump took office in 2017, according to the federal Refugee Processing Center. Over the past decade, Georgia has been in the top 10 states nationwide for resettlement, with more than 23,000 refugees coming to Georgia.
Scenes from World Refugee Day 2019 in Clarkston. Photos by Alyssa Pointer/AJC.
In DeKalb, the city of Clarkston is known for being a welcoming hub for refugees; the U.S. Census Bureau estimates more than half of Clarkston’s 12,700 residents are foreign-born, with many coming from countries including Sudan, Ethiopia, Bhutan and Myanmar.
Paedia Mixon, the CEO of the DeKalb-based resettlement agency New American Pathways, said DeKalb has the largest population of refugees in the state, with many living in Clarkston, Stone Mountain, Decatur and other communities. Gwinnett County also has a relatively high number of refugees, Mixon said, adding that New American Pathways has been in conversation with Gwinnett officials about reaffirming its commitment to resettling refugees.
“The state has been a welcoming place for refugees for a very long time,” Mixon said. “We think it’s very important that Georgia continue to welcome refugees. It’s a part of our humanitarian tradition.”
The Trump administration’s efforts to shrink the number of refugees in the U.S. are already being felt on the local level.
World Relief, a Christian humanitarian agency, suspended its federally funded resettlement program in Georgia earlier this year after 40 years of service.
New American Pathways, which receives federal funding for each refugee it helps, has lost a fifth of its $5 million budget and shed six and a half positions since Trump took office, Mixon said.
And International Rescue Committee’s Atlanta office has eliminated three case worker positions during that time, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported in September.
Last month, three resettlement agencies filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Maryland, arguing that the Trump administration’s executive order is unconstitutional. A federal judge is expected to rule on the motion by late January.