Georgia Senate sends cut in income tax to Kemp

Credit: Alyssa Pointer /

Credit: Alyssa Pointer /

The Senate on Thursday gave final approval to a small state income tax cut for Georgians who use the standard deduction when they file their returns, after the U.S. Treasury Department said tax breaks may be OK if not tied to COVID-19 relief funds.

Earlier this month the state House overwhelmingly approved House Bill 593, which would cut what filers pay by reducing the amount of income the state taxes. After a 35-15 vote in the Senate, the measure now heads to Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk for his signature.

“We want to give a break to hardworking Georgians, and that’s what this bill does,” said Sen. Larry Walker, R-Kathleen, who pushed the bill in the Senate.

But Sen. Sally Harrell, D-Atlanta, said high-earners won’t notice the tax cut. She said there were better ways to cut taxes for low-wage earners. And she added that the state needs money for things like taking care of disabled children who have been waiting for years for services.

“To me, a vote for House Bill 593 is a vote against people with disabilities,” Harrell said.

Congress put a provision into the federal $1.9 billion COVID-19 relief plan that passed last week saying money sent to states couldn’t be used for tax cuts, as some in Republican-led states had proposed.

About our coverage

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is tracking the money coming into Georgia from the $1.9 trillion federal stimulus package. Journalists from across the newsroom will document how the money is administered and spent, whether it accomplishes its goals and whether it creates any unintended consequences. It is part of our commitment to hold government accountable and show our readers how government action affects their lives. Our journalists work hard to be fair and will follow this complex story as it unfolds in the coming months and years.

Latest coverage of the $1.9 trillion stimulus

What the $1.9 trillion coronavirus stimulus means for U.S., Georgia

Kemp was angered by the provision, and House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, wrote President Joe Biden, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Georgia’s congressional delegation asking the federal government not to stop the measure.

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr joined nearly two-dozen other GOP attorneys general in sending a letter to Yellen blasting the prohibition, and Ohio’s attorney general sued the Biden administration over the provision.

But the U.S. Treasury Department said Wednesday that the prohibition on tax cuts wouldn’t necessarily apply to those that didn’t use COVID-19 relief funds.

The tax cut would be relatively small — less than $100 for a married couple filing jointly — but would cost the state $140 million a year.

Under the bill, the standard deduction for a single taxpayer would increase by $800, for a married couple filing a joint return, $1,100. Georgians who are over 65 or blind would get an additional $1,300 deduction.

Sen. Elena Parent, D-Atlanta, said lawmakers had talked for years about needing to do a host of things for Georgians, from providing rural areas high-speed internet service to increasing the number of people with health insurance. Instead, she said, Republicans pushed for a tax cut that could endanger federal funding if the feds end up challenging the measure.

But Senate Majority Whip Steve Gooch, R-Dahlonega, said the state can easily afford the modest tax cut.

“We’re not in a recession, our economy is growing, our budget is the highest it’s been in the history of our state, we have funds coming from D.C.,” Gooch said. “Why would we not want to give the money back to the people who sent it to us, to be good stewards of their funds? This is not our money, it’s their money.”

Parent said if the state wanted to do that, it could pass an earned-income tax credit to help low-income Georgians or make direct payments to people under the relief act, the same way the federal government is making payments to low- and middle-income families.

“There is a much smarter way to do it,” Parent said. “You can either do this and jeopardize hundreds of millions of dollars, or you could do it as a direct payment and still get the money.”