Because of the proliferation of absentee ballots during the pandemic, the board also allowed county election officials to open – but not tally – absentee ballots before the election. Most recently, they required counties to begin such processing eight days before the election – a move designed to speed up the reporting of results.
In the first lawsuit, the Twelfth District Republicans said those rules violate state law and provisions of the U.S. Constitution. They said the rules facilitate voting fraud and “ballot harvesting” – the practice of third parties gathering and returning many ballots. The practice is illegal in Georgia.
The lawsuit also challenged Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s guidance to counties on signature-matching procedures for absentee ballots. It said that guidance has discouraged local officials from rejecting signatures, potentially allowing illegal votes to be cast.
In court documents, Raffensperger’s office said the rules comply with state law. They said the Republicans have presented no evidence of ballot harvesting.
Raffensperger’s office also says the signature review process also complies with state law. And it argued other courts have been reluctant to change the rules of an election already in progress.
Hall cited those precedents in dismissing the Republicans’ lawsuit. He said they could have challenged the election rules months ago. And he said they had not demonstrated any injury that would give them standing to bring such a lawsuit, calling their allegations of fraud “highly speculative.”
Loeffler, Perdue, the Georgia Republican Party and the National Republican Senatorial Committee filed their lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Atlanta last week. The lawsuit focused on rules for the processing of absentee ballots that resulted from the settlement of a federal lawsuit earlier this year.
Under the settlement agreement, absentee ballots can’t be rejected because of a mismatched voter signature on the return envelope unless it’s reviewed by three election workers, with at least two of them agreeing the signature does not match.
The Republican lawsuit said the state’s rules treat ballots differently – only ballots with challenged signatures are reviewed by three people. It argued that the current process could allow illegal votes to be counted, diluting the ballots of legitimate voters.
Among other things, the lawsuit sought to have all signatures reviewed by three election workers. And it requested the new process begin before counties begin opening and scanning absentee ballots on Monday.
Among other things, attorneys for Raffensperger and the Democratic Party argued the Republican claims of fraud were speculative. Without proof of actual or immanent fraud, they said the Republicans lacked standing to bring the lawsuit.
U.S. District Judge Eleanor L. Ross agreed and dismissed the case.
The two lawsuits dismissed Thursday aren’t the only Republican lawsuits seeking to change absentee ballot rules. A case pending in Fulton County Superior Court seeks to limit the use of ballot drop boxes to normal business hours. A hearing is scheduled for next week.