The AJC has an interesting story today on the reconsideration of year-round school schedules where students have a shortened summer — around five weeks — and more breaks sprinkled throughout the year.
The story says there’s no strong evidence that the year-round calendar improves student performance. As a result, AJC education writer Mark Niesse says Atlanta may end its experiment with year-around schooling.
While this story focused on “year-round” schools, there are systems, including my own, that have adopted “modified year-around” calendars where students return to classes as early as Aug. 1. Under that schedule, students have seven to eight weeks off in the summer and week-long breaks in the fall and winter, in addition to the standard April spring break.
While both year-round and modified calendars accommodate families with the flexibility and finances to take vacations in the off-seasons, the schedules are tough on parents who cannot take the time off and have to find child care for their kids. Those parents have few good options for their kids compared to the summer when there are many camps.
Some of you will immediately respond that schools can’t consider working parents when they draft their calendars.
Why not?
The traditional school calendar was set up 120 years ago to serve working parents; those parents just happened to be farmers.
There is no more hard science behind the traditional calendar than there is behind the year-round or modified schedule so why shouldn’t schools create calendars that work best for their parent communities? And in most places, that remains the traditional calendar where kids have a longer summer.
Given the lack of options for kids out of school during the non-summer months, the traditional schedule is more congenial to working families because of the wider and cheaper array of available activities in June, July and August.
Here is an excerpt of the AJC story:
At Boyd and elsewhere in the Atlanta school system, academic progress at year-round schools ranges from awful to outstanding, leading education leaders to conclude that the calendar has little to do with classroom accomplishment.
Atlanta's school board is considering whether to abandon the year-round class calendar at the last three public elementary schools in the metro area still using it — Boyd, Centennial Place and Hutchinson. School officials say the extended schedule has failed to show results after experimenting with it for more than a decade.
"The reality is that there simply isn't any substantial research that says if you take the same number of days and permute them over different calendars, that the learning outcomes are appreciably different," Superintendent Erroll Davis said during a recent board work session. "There are more important factors than the calendar. And that is the quality of the principal and the quality of the teachers."
The Atlanta Board of Education decided Monday to continue the year-round calendar for another school year, but the board will evaluate over the next few months whether to switch to a more traditional calendar in the 2014-2015 school year.
Other school districts in Georgia have already moved away from the year-round calendar. Fulton County ended it at two schools in 2007 and Muscogee County nixed the calendar for the coming school year at two of its schools. Besides Atlanta and Muscogee County, only four other districts in the state — Clayton, Dooley, Seminole and Taliaferro counties — had schools with start dates before July 30 this school year, according to a Georgia Department of Education.
"Students in year-round schools do no better or no worse than the students who attend traditional calendar schools," said Valerie Fuller, spokeswoman for the Muscogee County School District, which includes the city of Columbus.
Among Atlanta elementary schools, Boyd's students pursue 12.8 months worth of knowledge compared to what an average student would take in over a typical nine-month school year, according to Atlanta Public Schools' value-added scores. Students at Centennial are close to average, at 9.7 months worth of education. Hutchinson was near the bottom at 6.2 months.
One downfall of the year-round calendar is that many students skip the first month of school each year and don't enroll until August, when most schools start. At Hutchinson, 25 percent of the student population enrolled after Aug. 6 this school year, according to the school district. At Centennial and Boyd, the numbers of students starting late were 11 percent and 14 percent, respectively.
Those students' tardiness lost them 18 days of class time out of 180 annual instructional days.
Parents of children at Boyd Elementary said they've grown used to the year-round calendar, which has been in place since 1999.
"I like it because they get more school during the summer," said Ciara Johnson, whose son is in fifth grade. "If you let them out too much in the summer time, they lose too much."
Last summer's five-week break was long enough, parents said. Students on a traditional calendar had more than 10 weeks off for summer.
–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog
RECENT POSTS
- Questions for DeKalb school board candidates: Vision, inspiration, student achievement
- Gun incident at Grady High highlights socio-economic divide. Can students overcome differences?
- The real crime in APS school shootings: No one did anything to stop these kids earlier.
- Governor releases list of 400 who want DeKalb board seats. Several former state officials and top employees are on it
- DeKalb board chair: Supports reducing legal fees but no details on spending to fight suspensions
- Will paid health insurance for retired teachers eventually go away? Can state afford to maintain benefit?
- More than 400 applicants seek vacated DeKalb school board seats. Any more resignations in the offing?
- Guest column: Fix, don't expand, Georgia's troubled private school tax credit program.
About the Author
