1. The board has hired a search firm
The board picked the Illinois-based consulting firm of Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates to help with the search and recruit candidates.
Five search firms expressed interest in the job. The board interviewed representatives from three of the firms and picked Hazard, Young because of its experience and knowledge of APS. The firm's consulting fee is $39,500, plus travel expenses and other costs, according to board documents.
2. Some still want Carstarphen to stay
While the search for her successor has launched, some continue to call for the board to reverse its decision and retain Carstarphen.
The board faced opposition from some of her supporters when they announced they would part ways. In interviews afterward, board members expressed a range of reasons for the decision. They included a need for more academic and financial accountability as well as a desire to find a new leader to guide the district's next five-year strategic plan.
In the weeks after the announcement, Carstarphen's backers urged the board to reconsider. They mailed flyers and circulated an online petition, though the board has pressed forward with the search.
But some haven’t given up.
This past week, Mary Norwood, the former two-time mayoral candidate, said she hoped the school board would keep Carstarphen.
Norwood said: “Nothing is done until it’s done. I’ve run for office too many times to not know that. Nothing is over until it’s truly over.”
3. Candidate names will be kept confidential
School board members have made it clear they want to keep the names of applicants quiet until they select one finalist for the job.
State law allows school districts to withhold applicants’ names from the public until a finalist or finalists are chosen. Board members have said that they’ll get more qualified candidates if they keep their identities secret.
A board attorney even offered advice on how to keep the search under wraps, saying the board can hold interviews at his law office and bring candidates up to a secured conference room via a service elevator.
4. The community has opinions
The board held a series of community input meetings in October to get feedback about what the public wants in the district's next leader.
Many said the next superintendent should have classroom and administrative experience and said the district should be focused on providing an equitable education for all students.
A board consultant compiled a report summarizing the feedback in an online report found here.
5. The board wants someone in place by July 1
The school board has agreed to a timeline for making the hiring decision. If they follow it, a new superintendent will be on the job by July 1.
The board plans to publicly post the job next month. Candidates would be screened and interviewed early next year.
A sole finalist would be named in May.
By law, the board must wait 14 days after the finalist’s name is announced before it can vote to hire that person.