That means they’re confronting a deadline. Thursday will be Crossover Day, when a bill typically needs to pass at least one chamber in the General Assembly in order to have a chance at becoming law this year.
Both require that companies post prices and network information so patients can look for that information.
Hufstetler’s bill goes further. It would require insurance companies to pay their client’s doctor bills even though they don’t have a contract with that doctor. As in past years, all the controversy revolves around what price the law would set for the insurer to pay. If the price list mandated by the government is too high, it would raise the question why any doctor would sign an insurance contract to begin with, when he or she could instead take the price set by law for out-of-network doctors.
SB 56 pegs the price to a nonprofit price database of medical bills that have actually been paid previously. Insurance companies say those prices are indeed too high, and they oppose the bill.
Over in the House, Smith’s bill wouldn’t require insurance companies to pay the balance at all. It would leave the burden on the patient to ask whether his or her doctors and health care providers would all be in his insurance policy network. It would require health care providers to let the patient know how much they’ll bill the patient, but only if the patient figures out first if he or she needs to ask.
Most of the services involved in those kinds of surprise bills are non-emergencies, where a patient may not know to investigate but at least has time. The Legislature does not appear to be acting on surprise emergency room bills that result where an insurance company may say the patient shouldn't have gone to the emergency room in the first place. A federal suit is pending over that practice.
Stay on top of what’s happening in Georgia government and politics at ajc.com/news/georgia-government/.