Collins also used his opening statement to criticize the decision to invite four constitutional law experts to the hearing, three of whom were recommended by Democrats and one called by Republicans. One of them, Stanford University law professor Pamela Karlan later said she took offense at his insinuation they had not reviewed the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report before testifying.
“Mr. Collins, I would like to say to you, sir, that I read transcripts of every one of the witnesses who appeared in the live hearing because I would not speak about these things without reviewing the facts,” she said. “So I’m insulted by the suggestion that as a law professor I don’t care about those facts.”
Throughout the meeting, Collins and other Republicans forced procedural votes on requests varying from postponing the hearing to requiring House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and an anonymous whistleblower to testify. Democrats, who are in the majority, objected each time.
Two Georgia Democrats, U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath of Marietta, and U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson of Lithonia, sit on the committee. Johnson said the GOP members attempted to deflect attention away from the case for impeachment made by three of the legal experts.
He doesn’t think it worked.
“I think the Republicans have been pretty ineffective at rebutting what these constitutional scholars testified to today, and that is the standard for impeachment and whether or not the evidence that is available to Congress at the time meets that standard,” he said. “And the Democratic witnesses were unanimous that it does.”
Johnson said he is ready to move forward with articles of impeachment.
“The evidence is overwhelming,” he said, “and it is sufficient to proceed with impeachment.”