The SEC’s new rule

Disciplinary Actions. A transfer student-athlete who has been subject to official university or athletics department disciplinary action at any time during enrollment at any previous collegiate institution (excluding limited discipline applied by a sports team or temporary disciplinary action during an investigation) due to serious misconduct (as defined herein) shall not be eligible for athletically-related financial aid, practice or competition at an SEC member institution.

For purposes of this provision, “serious misconduct” is defined as sexual assault, domestic violence or other forms of sexual violence.

Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice is seen punching — and knocking out — his fiancee in a hotel elevator. Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston is accused of rape.

It’s no secret that football has been struggling with a woman problem.

So, when the SEC moved recently to ban its schools from accepting athletes subject to charges of sexual or domestic violence at another institution it was calculated to strike a new and improved tone of zero tolerance. The 14-school conference — a football powerhouse — seemed determined to avoid the missteps the National Football League made in its handling of the Rice scandal. The proposal was pushed by the University of Georgia, which has cut marquee players for bad behavior only to see them reappear on the other side of the the line of scrimmage suited up for the other team.

But already there is some confusion and grumbling about the new policy, notably from University of Alabama Coach Nick Saban, who said it’s too vague and denies promising players a second chance. This year, Saban’s squad accepted a player who’d been booted from UGA for sexual misconduct.

Most sexual assaults on college campuses are also not reported, or not investigated if the victim chooses not to cooperate, so the new rule won’t apply in many situations. Given questions about the scope of the new rule from coaches such as Saban, it’s also unclear how uniformly it will be applied by SEC schools.

But the fact that SEC weighed in shows how politically treacherous the issue of violence against women has become in the big-bucks world of college football.

The ‘Jonathan Taylor Rule’

SEC university officials who adopted the proposal at meeting late last month in Destin, Fla., made clear that the ban had a poster child: Jonathan Taylor.

The 6-foot-4, 335-pound University of Georgia defensive lineman was arrested last summer in Athens and charged with aggravated assault and battery for an attack against a female student. Taylor used his hands to choke her and had also struck her “several times with a closed fist,” according to a police report. Police who arrived at her dorm room said the 19-year-old women had bruises on her arms and legs as well as scratches and red marks on her neck. Taylor was booted from the UGA football team.

But after spending last fall at Copiah-Lincoln Community College in Mississippi, he found a new home: the University of Alabama in January. Just three months after arriving in Tuscaloosa, however, he was in trouble again — charged him with beating another girlfriend, police said. The woman in that alleged assault has since recanted her statement but the charges have not been dropped. Alabama, which had faced scrutiny for signing Taylor in the first place, let him go.

Taylor has pled not guilty to the charges in Athens and his attorney, Kim Stephens, said a status conference in the case is scheduled for late this month.

To critics, it pointed to all that was wrong with college football: placing money and winning over ethics.

UGA athletic director Greg McGarity told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution said the Taylor move "certainly added to the discussion," but he said the issue was already on the minds of school officials, especially following the Rice scandal.

“We felt the SEC should take a stand, a very public stand and we hope it sends a strong message to young men and to young women that this type of behavior will absolutely not be tolerated,” McGarity said.

“We hope this gains more traction nationally.”

The SEC is believed to be the first college athletic conference to adopt such a rule. An official with The Atlantic Coast Conference — home to Georgia Tech’s football program — said it doesn’t have a similar proposal currently under consideration.

Allen Sack, a professor at the College of Business at the University of New Haven who played on Notre Dame’s 1966 National Championship Football Team, said there is one reason that other football programs may be reluctant to follow suit.

“Money. It is gigantic money,” Sack said. “It’s why schools sign some kids they shouldn’t. Because if they’re not going to play for your school they are going to play somewhere else.”

Dan Lebowitz, director of the Center for the Study of Sport in Society at Northeastern University, agreed.

“The SEC did what they always do. They took on an incredibly high-risk kid because he could play football,” he said. “Now what they are doing is looking at the long-term sustainability of their brand.”

Loopholes and vague language

But while the new SEC policy is aimed at preventing violence against women there are loopholes and potential landmines.

The new SEC rule bans the transfer of a student athlete “who has been subject to official university or athletics department disciplinary action at any time during enrollment at any previous collegiate institution.” Serious misconduct is defined narrowly, later on in the rule, as”sexual assault, domestic violence or other forms of sexual violence.”

There is no stipulation that the individual be found guilty, or even formally charged.

That omission irked Alabama’s Saban who said it should “clearly define exactly why or what” the offenses were at the previous school, and that the words “convicted and felony should be involved in the rule.”

McGarity allowed that the ban could apply even to those who had faced allegations without a formal charge or finding of wrongdoing. But he said the rule allows for the SEC commissioner to issue a waiver that could be used in those instances.

Another big loophole is one that underscores and complicates most sexual assault cases: many victims never come forward or — if they do — often decline to pursues charges.

One such instance, involving a pair of UGA football players, was detailed in records reviewed by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution as part of a series of stores on campus rape. In the 2010 case, a young woman told police she had become drunk and only learned she had sex with the two players through a text message exchange the next day.

“This sickens me because I do not remember this at all and did not give consent for it at all,” she told police.

Nonetheless the victim and her friend “expressed a certain apprehension about pressing charges against athletes, citing that they had to see the athletes every day because they live in the same dorm,” according to the police report. The victim’s friend described “intimidation” many non-athletes in the dorm felt.

The AJC is not naming the men since they were not charged criminally. As a matter of policy, the AJC does not name victims of sexual assault.

Women and Football

Despite football’s notoriously macho culture, women have been flocking to the game in greater and greater numbers. Over the past few years, the NFL has attracted more regular season female viewers than either professional basketball and baseball. Some estimates say women make up some 45 percent of pro football fans.

So, it’s no wonder the sport is looking to keep them in the fold.

Lebowitz said the NFL in particular has made a targeted push to recruit female fans, marketing jerseys in feminine cuts and establishing fantasy football teams aimed at women.

And while Taylor may have a difficult road ahead in the courts his football career may not be over yet.

Stephens, his attorney, said he’s had calls from some schools inquiring about the likely outcome of the criminal charges, which he said are more complicated than have been portrayed so far in police documents.

“His SEC career may be over but I think — I hope — he will play football again,” Stephens said.

About the Author

Keep Reading

(2023 file photo) Fort Gordon, near Augusta, Georgia, was renamed as Fort Eisenhower in 2023. Could it be switched back to Fort Gordon? (Hyosub Shin/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution/TNS)

Credit: TNS

Featured

State Rep. Kimberly New, R-Villa Rica, stands in the House of Representatives during Crossover Day at the Capitol in Atlanta on Thursday, March 6, 2025. (Arvin Temkar/AJC)

Credit: Arvin Temkar/AJC