A day earlier, Bociurkiw reported seeing workers “hacking into the fuselage with gas-powered equipment.”
Experts say a cardinal rule of investigations has been breached.
“The crash site is a crime scene and, as everyone knows, you don’t mess with crime scenes,” said Justin Green, an aviation industry lawyer in New York and former military pilot and crash investigator. “This crime scene has been disturbed. Quite substantially disturbed.”
Airline disaster investigations have two main strands — identifying the victims and establishing what happened. In this case, the U.S. and its allies believe the plane was shot down with a missile fired by pro-Russian separatists.
Identifying the victims ought to be relatively straightforward. Some can be visually identified by relatives, through distinguishing features such as tattoos or scars, or by the use of dental records. For bodies torn apart in the disaster, DNA analysis should provide grieving families with definitive evidence their loved ones have been found.
For days, Dutch police officers have been visiting the bereaved across the Netherlands — home to 193 of the dead — seeking information about distinguishing features and collecting DNA samples for use in identifying the remains. That process will start today at a military barracks in the Dutch town of Hilversum, after the first planes carrying remains arrive in the Netherlands on a national day of mourning.
Anthony Busuttil, chief pathologist in the investigation into the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jet over Lockerbie, Scotland, said a surprisingly large number of bodies could be intact despite plunging tens of thousands of feet to the ground. Identifying them should not be a problem, he said.
But methodically establishing exactly what happened to the flight will be harder, given the way the evidence has been handled.
“Bits of the plane, bodies, property from the bodies, property from the plane, were being picked up willy-nilly,” he said. “We don’t know where the bodies have been — there’s a stick in the field where they were found or what have you. There’s no accuracy. There’s no continuity. There’s no detail.”