While the race for President and a looming government shutdown won’t go away as issues in Washington, D.C., this week the nation’s capital will be focused on the visit of Pope Francis, as the Pontiff goes to the White House and addresses the Congress.

For Speaker John Boehner, he has described the Pope’s visit as a “humbling experience,” one that the top Republican in Congress has been trying to make happen for some twenty years.

It will also be an important day for Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat in the House – like Boehner, she is also a Catholic.

“We are thrilled and grateful for Pope Francis honoring us with a visit to the Congress and our country,” Pelosi said.

Boehner and Pelosi are part of the nearly one-third of the Congress that identify as Catholic; the US population is about 22 percent Catholic.

But when it comes to Washington, the Pope’s trip isn’t just a simple story about some guy coming to visit the nation’s capital, as it has already stirred political differences on a number of levels.

“Pope Francis embodies sanctity but comes trailing clouds of sanctimony,” wrote conservative columnist George Will last week, as Republicans wonder if the Pope will use his visit to demand action on climate change.

That possibility has led one GOP lawmaker – a Catholic – to boycott the Pope’s speech.

“But when the Pope chooses to act and talk like a leftist politician, the he can expect to be treated like one,” Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz, said.

“If the Pope stuck to standard Christian theology, I would be the first in line,” said Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), who is Catholic.

“But when the Pope chooses to act and talk like a leftist politician, then he can expect to be treated like one,” said Gosar, the first lawmaker to say he would boycott the papal speech.

Little action on possible government shutdown

While the Pope’s visit will dominate headlines in Washington, D.C., don’t expect much headway this week in the Congress on what’s next in a battle that may lead to a government shutdown.

The schedule in both the House and Senate have no measures related to funding for the federal government, which runs out at midnight on September 30.

It’s not clear if GOP leaders will try to approve a stop-gap budget with extra language that bans federal funding for the group Planned Parenthood; last week the House approved a measure that stops funding for one year in a vote that went almost straight along party lines, the measure passing 241 to 187.

The House has more than enough Republican votes to approve just about anything; but it’s the same old story in the Senate, where Republicans do not have 60 votes for any measure that blocks money for Planned Parenthood.

And the GOP is definitely not on the same page when it comes to a government shutdown fight related to Planned Parenthood.

“I am completely opposed to shutting down the government,” Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) told reporters in her home state last week.

Earlier this month, just off the Senate floor, Ayotte openly questioned the shutdown demands of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), telling reporters that the Cruz strategy won’t work.

“How do we get 60 votes?” Ayotte said in an exasperated voice to reporters just as she left the Senate floor.

“What’s the strategy?” Ayotte added.

That fight will be on simmer this week while the Pope is in town, but will explode the week of September 28.

Congress on retirement watch

Back at work after a lengthy summer break, three GOP lawmakers in the Congress have announced their retirements already this month, a reminder of the natural turnover that has gone on in both the House and Senate in recent years.

This week brought retirement announcements from Rep. Dan Benishek (R-MI) and Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX); earlier this month, Rep. John Kline (R-PA) had said he would not run for re-election.

So far this year, 8 House members have decided not to run for another term, while another 13 House members are running for another elected office instead of sticking with their seat in the U.S. House.

That means five percent of the House already won’t be returning in January of 2017 for the 115th Congress.

The same rate of retirements has hit the Senate, where five members will not be returning after the next election in 2016.

The retirement numbers seem likely to grow in the House, where turnover in the last six Congressional election years has averaged 14 percent in the House and 11 percent in the Senate.

That means on average in the six elections from 2004-2014:

  • 62 House members either retired, ran for other office, or were defeated in their re-election bids (14 percent)
  • An average of just over 11 Senators did not return in those elections, as they decided either to retire, run for other office, or suffered election defeat

At this point for the 2016 elections, the total change is 21 seats in the House and 5 seats in the Senate.

Those figures will only go up as more lawmakers are likely to decide against re-election – and given that next year is certain to bring election defeat for some, either in their party primaries or later in the November 2016 elections.