Judge describes horror of ambush shooting that killed son

Calls for increased privacy protections for federal judges after attack by 'madman'
U.S. District Judge Esther Salas' only son, Daniel Anderl, was killed after a gunman posing as a FedEx delivery person showed up at her North Brunswick, N.J., home and opened fire. Her husband was also wounded and remains hospitalized.

Credit: AP

Credit: AP

U.S. District Judge Esther Salas' only son, Daniel Anderl, was killed after a gunman posing as a FedEx delivery person showed up at her North Brunswick, N.J., home and opened fire. Her husband was also wounded and remains hospitalized.

The federal judge whose son was killed by a misogynistic lawyer released her first statement about the shooting Monday, describing the horror that unfolded as her 20-year-old only child ran to answer the door and a “madman” opened fire.

» PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Man accused of killing judge’s son named as suspect in another fatal shooting

The judge, Esther Salas, also issued a call for increased privacy protections for federal judges, saying the death of her son, Daniel, should not be in vain. Her husband, Mark Anderl, who was shot three times, remains hospitalized.

“Two weeks ago, my life as I knew it changed in an instant, and my family will never be the same,” Salas said in her video statement. “A madman, who I believe was targeting me because of my position as a federal judge, came to my house.”

» FROM APRIL: Death threats lead to beefed-up security for nation’s top disease expert

She described a weekend celebration at their New Jersey home for Daniel’s 20th birthday that included several of his friends from Catholic University of America, who had stayed overnight.

“The weekend was a glorious one,” Salas added, choking back tears. “It was filled with love, laughter, and smiles.”

She and her son were in the basement talking when the doorbell rang.

“Daniel looked at me and said, ‘Who is that?’”

“And before I could say a word, he sprinted upstairs. Within seconds, I heard the sound of bullets and someone screaming, ‘No!’”

The home of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, in North Brunswick, N.J., where a gunman posing as a deliveryman shot and killed Salas' 20-year-old son and wounded her husband before fleeing.

Credit: AP

icon to expand image

Credit: AP

Daniel’s final act, she said, was to protect his father from the man she described as a monster.

“He took the shooter’s first bullet directly to the chest,” she said. “The monster then turned his attention to my husband and began to shoot at my husband, one shot after another.”

Salas said the man, believed to have been Roy Den Hollander, who later killed himself, was carrying a FedEx package in his hand — an apparent ruse to coax the family to open the door.

» RELATED: Who is Roy Den Hollander?

Until that moment on July 19, it had been an otherwise routine Sunday: Salas and her husband went to church, and Daniel, who was about to start his junior year in college, caught up on some sleep after his friends left for the weekend.

She said Den Hollander had compiled a dossier on her and her family, including their address in North Brunswick, New Jersey, and the church they attended.

Days before, Den Hollander, 72, had traveled by train to San Bernardino County, California, where he shot and killed a rival men’s rights lawyer at his home, authorities said.

This July 11, 2020 surveillance photo provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department shows a man who they believe is Roy Den Hollander walking through Union Station in Los Angeles.

Credit: AP

icon to expand image

Credit: AP

Hours after the shooting in New Jersey, police found Den Hollander’s body off a road in upstate New York with a single gunshot to the head.

Den Hollander was a self-described “anti-feminist” with a record of virulently misogynistic and hateful writing. He represented the most extreme element of the men’s right movement whose online discussions in recent years have become increasingly menacing toward women.

He was apparently angry at Salas for not moving quickly enough on a lawsuit he had brought challenging the constitutionality of the male-only draft.

Salas said she understood that judge’s decisions would be scrutinized.

“We know that our job requires us to make tough calls, and sometimes those calls can leave people angry and upset,” she said. “That comes with the territory and we accept that.

“But what we cannot accept is when we are forced to live in fear for our lives because personal information, like our home addresses, can be easily obtained by anyone seeking to do us or our families harm.”

She called for a national conversation on ways to safeguard the privacy of federal judges.

“My family has experienced a pain that no one should ever have to endure,” she said, “And I am here asking everyone to help me ensure that no one ever has to experience this kind of pain.”