Goodnight Moon and opportunity: A worrisome gap between rich and poor

Shopping at a local gift shop, I overheard a young mother speak to her toddler with the precise diction of an English professor, “I want to  meander  a little longer. Will you  meander  with me? Then, we’ll get a  delectable  snack.”


Both those kids will arrive in kindergarten around the same time, one primed with SAT vocabulary words, the other trained to litter.

Somehow, schools are supposed to propel these students to the same finish line, ready to take their place in an increasingly complex world where advanced literacy and math skills are imperatives.

In a recent  webcast  on high school graduation rates, Robert D, Putnam, author of “Bowling Alone” and the new book “Our Kids,” discussed the graduation gap between rich and poor kids, a gap driven, he says, more by social class than race.

As a social scientist and professor of public policy at Harvard, Putnam chronicled the disintegration of civic and community life in America in “Bowling Alone.”

In “Our Kids,” Putnam goes a step farther, how our loss of community extends to school and he uses his own hometown of Port Clinton, Ohio, as a template.

When he grew up, the term “our kids” referred to the larger community, to all the kids in town. People paid for new pools so all the children of Port Clinton had a place to swim and raised money so every player on the football team had a uniform and equipment.

Now, Putnam says “our kids” means either the children in our own family or our own “enclave.” As a result, there are private swim clubs and hefty pay-to-play fees in high school sports.

There is a toll to the United States from the rise of an  under-educated class of Americans. Lost earnings and social services expenditures will add up to more than it would cost to invest in quality preschool, after-school programs, mentoring and extracurricular opportunities, he says.

“Kids are getting better and better coming from college-educated homes. Things are getting worse and worse for poor kids, kids coming from what we used to call the working class,” said Putnam.

Putnam cites the disparity in what he calls “Goodnight Moon” time, referencing the beloved bedtime story as a representation of the hours educated parents devote to their children.

There used to be no difference in the amount of time rich and poor parents spent reading to their kids. Now, Putnam says, “My granddaughter gets 45 minutes a day more reading time with mom and dad than equally smart kids from the working class. We know now from recent brain science that the architecture of the infant brain changes where there is adult-child interaction. There is a growing gap in those kids living in circumstances where the parents don’t or can’t spend that time reading, a growing gap in ‘Goodnight Moon’ time.”

A few weeks, I went with my daughter, the mother of an 8-month-old, to a Mother’s Day celebration at a local community center that specializes in classes for new moms. After meeting young mothers who take their infants to baby sign language and yoga classes and listening to their discussions of breast pumps, homemade baby food and educational toys, I was convinced they were raising a super race.

We chortle over the intense focus of young parents on their children’s development, seeing them as overly attentive and hovering. We shake our heads over Park Avenue parents who pay $35,000 for top Manhattan preschools that teach 3-year-olds  Mandarin.

But emerging research shows such investments of time, energy and money in these tiny humans produce immense returns in school readiness and success.

The differences in good and bad schools today is less about what schools do than what students bring to school, argues Putnam. Children of educated households bring a bounty of parental involvement, expectations and resources. Poor kids bring liabilities, including economic pressures, family dysfunction and distracted parents.

More than 90 percent of children in college-educated homes are being raised by two parents, says Putnam, compared to 30 percent of children from high school-educated homes. His concern is not moral, but practical. One parent can do less for a child than two parents.

Smart, poor kids with high test scores are now less likely to graduate from college than not-so-smart rich kids with low test scores, exactly the opposite of what the American dream used to be, says Putnam.

The biggest challenge, Putnam says, “is convincing people on up side of the opportunity gap that this is their problem.”

Putnam says we have to offer early preschool and not just get kids into community colleges, but get them out. We need parental coaching so less educated parents understand the importance of “Goodnight Moon” time.

We have to concentrate our best teachers in the least advantaged schools, and increase mentoring, “not just Big Brother and Big Sister squared but to the nth power,” Putnam says.

“Your chances in life shouldn’t depend on your parents,” he says. “They should depend on you.”

Support real journalism. Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today. See offers.

Your subscription to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution funds in-depth reporting and investigations that keep you informed. Thank you for supporting real journalism.

About the Author

Maureen Downey
Maureen Downey
Maureen Downey has written editorials and opinion pieces about local, state and federal education policy since the 1990s.