“In 2009 … Hillary Clinton was at the State Department working with U.S. corporations to pressure Haiti not to raise the minimum wage to 61 cents an hour from 24 cents.”
— Lee Camp on Sunday, April 17th, 2016 in an episode of “Redacted Tonight”
Hillary Clinton colluded with big business to maintain slave wages for workers in one of the world’s poorest countries, according to the host of an RT American comedy news show.
Comedian and activist Lee Camp of RT’s Redacted Tonight mocked Clinton’s efforts to “keep 37 cents per hour out of the hands of destitute Haitians.”
“In 2009, while Bill Clinton was setting up one of the family’s shell companies in New York, in that same year Hillary Clinton was at the State Department working with U.S. corporations to pressure Haiti not to raise the minimum wage to 61 cents an hour from 24 cents,” Camp said April 17. “Seriously.”
Seriously?
Sort of. Memos from 2008 and 2009 obtained by Wikileaks strongly suggest that the State Department helped block the proposed minimum wage increase. The memos show that U.S. Embassy officials in Haiti clearly opposed the wage hike and met multiple times with factory owners who directly lobbied against it to the Haitian president.
The Clinton campaign refuted the claim, and the State Department didn’t comment.
In 2011, Wikileaks made nearly 2,000 cables available to the progressive magazine, The Nation, and Haiti Liberté, a weekly newspaper in Port-au-Prince.
The two media found that the “U.S. Embassy in Haiti worked closely with factory owners contracted by Levi’s, Hanes, and Fruit of the Loom to aggressively block a paltry minimum wage increase” for workers in apparel factories.
The U.S. Embassy officials began monitoring the minimum wage issue as early as 2008, when the Haitian Parliament began discussing doubling or tripling the daily minimum wage of 70 Haitian gourdes to keep up with inflation. That’s roughly equal to $1.75 a day.
But back in 2008 and 2009, embassy officials repeatedly told Washington that a hike would hurt the economy and undermine U.S. trade preference legislation known as HOPE.
The program, shorthand for the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2006, gives garments manufactured on the island duty free access to U.S. markets. Levi Strauss, Haneswear, Nautica, and Dockers are just some of the American companies that benefit from HOPE. Congress passed HOPE II in 2008, extending the program for another 10 years.
In January 2008, Ambassador Janet Sanderson wrote that representatives of the business community had met with embassy officials and criticized Haitian President René Préval’s efforts to raise the minimum wage as the wrong medicine for the ailing economy.
An unsigned embassy cable sent to Washington in December 2008 echoed the private sector’s assessment and reported that increasing the minimum wage would “have significant impact” on business.
The State Department continued to promote HOPE as an economic boon for the island. In memos prepping U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and Clinton for their visits to Haiti, chargé d’affaires Thomas Tighe told the diplomats to “urge” the Haitian government take advantage of HOPE and HOPE II.
Deputy Chief of Mission David Lindwall put it most bluntly, when he said the minimum wage law “did not take economic reality into account but that appealed to the unemployed and underpaid masses.”
Nonetheless, the Haitian Parliament voted to triple the daily minimum wage to 200 gourdes ($5 a day, or about 62 cents per hour) in May 2009. As the bill awaited President Préval’s signature, students protested over the delay while factory owners criticized the legislation.
The U.S. Embassy, meanwhile, continued to lament the hike and raised concerns about the stability of the region that they hoped Préval would help address, according to the cables.
Sanderson, in a June 10 memo, cited a study by the Haitian Association of Industry (ADIH) stating that the new minimum wage “would result in the loss of 10,000 workers in the sector” and noted that ADIH has met with Préval three times.
A few days later, Préval seemed to be on board with the embassy and industry position on the minimum wage issue.
On June 17, Tighe told Washington that industry and USAID studies found that a 200 gourdes minimum wage “would make the sector economically unviable and consequently force factories to shut down.”
Protesters continued to call for Préval to sign the original bill, with some demonstrations escalating into violence, as parliament considered the president’s amendments.
By July, Préval was a formal and vocal opponent of the 200 gourds wage, warning of the consequences for jobs.
In the fall of 2009, Préval and Parliament agreed to enact the $5 daily wage for all sectors except textiles, which got a $3 wage. But was the State Department right in opposing the increase?
“I have no idea what would happen if Haiti did have a $5-a-day minimum wage,” Adam Davidson of NPR’s Planet Money said in 2011. “But I do think it’s reasonable to assume that some factories would close and far fewer new ones would be built. Far fewer Haitians would be allowed to take that first tentative step on to the ladder of industrial development.”
Our ruling
Camp said, “In 2009 … Hillary Clinton was at the State Dept working with U.S. corporations to pressure Haiti not to raise the minimum wage to 61 cents an hour from 24 cents.”
Leaked cables show that the U.S. Embassy in Haiti opposed the minimum wage hike that the Haitian parliament passed in 2009, and discussed the issue with business groups.
However, the cables do not contain conclusive evidence that the State Department actively pressured Haiti to block the increase. Nor do they prove that Clinton personally played a role.
We rate Camp’s claim Half True.
About the Author
