‘Trickle-down’ economics widens rich-poor gap
The AJC-sponsored survey (News, Jan. 15) of Georgia voters indeed “mirrors national surveys showing voters are cool” to the recent federal tax legislation — about 46 percent disapprove, about 20 percent are uncertain. Further, nearly 40 percent anticipate the legislation as a “drag” on the economy, while 20 percent see “no difference.” Interestingly, Georgia voters’ insights generally correspond with those expressed by national opinion-makers, including economists from a University of Chicago survey, i.e., expectations are “inflated” and “unrealistic.”
The legislation is the most recent version of the Reagan era’s supply-side economics: reduced taxes will accelerate economic growth, increase revenues, reduce deficits/debt, and benefits will eventually “trickle down” to all income groups. However, the results were generally dismal. Not only national debt almost tripled, but there was “trickle-up:” income-inequalities increased sharply.
Some refer to “trickle-down” as the “horse-and-sparrow” thesis: if you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through the horse and ‘trickle-down’ on the road for sparrows. Most expect that scenario as the realistic possibility from current legislation. The pro-business/pro-rich legislation will likely fatten the horses, and further widen the rich-poor gap.
S.M. GHAZANFAR, ACWORTH
Booker’s speech full of drama, posturing
Cory Booker put on quite a performance at the DHS hearing. He thinks he is outraged; Believe me when I say I am equally so. To think that a sitting Congressman could take up everyone’s time with a rehearsed speech, full of drama and complete with all the staging of a Hollywood play, hoping that will propel him into a leader’s position is preposterous. Talk about having psychiatric testing. Here is an example very plain to see. Someone throw him the hook.
MEL MATUSZAK, DACULA
About the Author
Keep Reading
The Latest
Featured
