The point of the new Sandy Springs law is to make it so police officers aren’t responding to 8,000 calls that 99 percent of the time are false alarms.
Photo: Cox Media File Photo
Photo: Cox Media File Photo

Sandy Springs could tweak contested alarm law at last minute

The Sandy Spring City Council could make a last-minute change to its contentious home and business alarm response ordinance, a new law that could have statewide implications.

The City Council initially planned to require alarm companies to provide a video or immediate verification of a burglary taking place before police would respond to an alarm.

But now the council is planning for police to continue responding immediately to alarms. This proposal gives alarm companies 24 hours to provide video proof of the burglary that caused the alarm.


BACKGROUND | Police won’t respond? Sandy Springs law shows tension with alarm groups


Dispatch operator Kelah Handley answers calls at a Sandy Springs 911 call center on Wednesday, April 17, 2019. STEVE SCHAEFER / SPECIAL TO THE AJC

“We’re going to take them at their word,” city spokeswoman Sharon Kraun said Monday. She added: “We didn’t want to leave any room for interpretation.”

Experts have said that, if upheld in the courts, the Sandy Springs model of verified response could be adopted by other municipalities in Georgia.

The 24-hour window for verification is the latest of many tweaks to a 2013 City Council ordinance that aimed to reduce the amount of police time wasted on false alarms. The city estimates 99% of its 8,000 burglary calls each year are false alarms.

The law, set to take effect June 19, makes companies responsible for paying fines for false alarms, though it’s expected some businesses will pass along costs to customers.


IN OTHER LOCAL NEWS | Sandy Springs, first in cityhood, changes how it does business


There was plenty of confusion between those who own the 14,080 alarms registered with the city and the 226 registered alarm companies even before this proposal.

Kraun said the 24-hour grace period was something that a coalition of alarm companies has wanted throughout years of negotiation. When asked why the change was being made less than a month before the law’s start, Kraun said: “It was just a timing thing.”


Like North Fulton County News Now on Facebook Follow on Twitter


The coalition is appealing a judge’s decision in a lawsuit between them and the city. Alarm companies argue that fining companies instead of customers makes little sense because so many bad calls come from a small group of customers who don’t know how to use their alarms.

The proposed law is expected to be voted on at Tuesday’s City Council meeting in City Hall, 1 Galambos Way, beginning at 6 p.m.


Catch up...

They now want proof that there's an emergency before they'll respond.

Support real journalism. Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today. See offers.

Your subscription to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution funds in-depth reporting and investigations that keep you informed. Thank you for supporting real journalism.

X