IRS SCRUTINY
Outrage is misplaced until all facts are in
As a CPA, I believe it could be entirely appropriate for the IRS to target a group of similarly situated organizations (including tea party groups) for examination or extra scrutiny without regard to the political views of the organizations. It is generally accepted that there is substantial abuse of tax exempt status by individuals and organizations that cost the United States Treasury significant tax revenues.
If the IRS identifies a pattern of abuse, it is duty-bound to examine each organization that fits the pattern, whether that pattern is associated with organizations within a specific geographic region, or includes “tea party” in its name. The personal beliefs of the examining agents or management should dictate neither exclusion nor inclusion. The IRS may have identified some commonalities that prompted further investigation — such as common organizers; common funding sources, or common legal representation. Any of these should warrant extra scrutiny.
The outrage on both sides of the political aisle is misplaced until the facts and circumstances reveal rationale inconsistent with established audit practices and principles.
RICHARD ROSE, ATLANTA
DRIVER SERVICES
Public servants give thoughtful assistance
I just returned from a most rewarding contact with a local office of the Georgia Department of Driver Services. I found no incompetent bureaucrats — only hard workers coping with massive workloads.
While I stood in line, a clerk noticed my cane and invited me to take part in a somewhat expedited procedure. I filled in the form, presented my documents, passed the vision test, got my picture taken, paid my bill and was done. The whole thing took about an hour. Without the treatment I received, it would have been there about an hour and a half.
HERB EBER, ATLANTA
FULTON COUNTY
Tax chief’s behavior invites voter response
Regarding “Vehicle a perk for tax chief” (News, May 14), it can be argued that Fulton County Tax Commissioner Arthur Ferdinand deserves to be the state’s highest-paid elected official because he generates large funds. It can be further argued that since he is a revenue generator, an automobile and the accompanying upkeep are inconsequential perks. However, the reality is that the very nature of his current job will always produce large revenue.
While (legally), according to present policy, he has access to a provided vehicle, in light of county’s economic conditions and his dubious cut of tax lien funds, a good commissioner would lead by example — a good example, and not the bad one he now displays. If Commissioner Ferdinand ignores the issues created by pursuing the vehicle and lien policies, then it is up to the voters to make the change for him.
MICHAEL L. SHAW, STONE MOUNTAIN
