Trump immigration proposal is brilliant
Donald Trump’s plan to abolish the 14th Amendment is brilliant! Think of the implications of making America great again. First, we send all the brown people back to Mexico. That’s at least 30 million with the illegals and their kids born here. With that many, Mexico can pay them to build a couple feet each of the boarder wall that they are going to build for our benefit.
Second, since they are all descendants of slaves, we can send all blacks back to the “country” of Africa, paid for by the Dutch government, since they shipped them here to begin with. Next to go are those Asians. They didn’t have papers when they came to build the railroads, and I am certain China will pay to take them back, too. And those Native Americans? They walked here from Asia. Let them walk back.
White, what a lovely color. Oops! I forgot something: My ancestors landed at Plymouth Rock, not Ellis Island. I wonder if I’ll get the boot, too?
ALFRED M. SMITH, MARIETTA
Whatever happens, Democrats prevail
It has been said that Trump was at one time a Democrat. If that is true, and he is still harboring Democratic philosophy under his hat, he is setting up a condition in which Democrats can’t lose. If he pulls off the Republican nomination, whether he wins or loses, a Democrat will be in the White House. If he doesn’t get the Republican nomination, he can start a third party movement that will split the Republican vote, and a Democrat will be in the White House. Dear God, I hope I’m wrong!
DAVID A. PAUL, SANDY SPRINGS
A question Clinton needs to answer
Hillary Clinton states she never sent or received any e-mail on her personal server marked “confidential.” Unless she had some very sophisticated server that controlled incoming e-mails, she might not have sent any messages marked “confidential,” but how could she have prevented receiving such e-mails? I have not seen anything in the news that poses this question. I receive lots of e-mails from numerous senders, many of whom I care little or nothing as they are promoting some business or service not wanted. If she was able to stop e-mails that she would not want to receive (i.e., any marked “confidential”), that technology should be shared by the public.
MIKE DEAL, ALPHARETTA
