The State Department had said last week that the secretary would testify before Issa’s panel but that the appearance “would remove any need for the secretary to appear before the select committee to answer additional questions.”
The California Republican said he had no choice but to reassess.
“It’s been disappointing to watch a long-serving former senator, like Secretary Kerry, squirm his way to what I’m doing today — releasing him from the upcoming hearing commitment he made only after we issued him a subpoena,” Issa said in a statement.
Issa had twice subpoenaed Kerry to testify about emails and other documents that the Obama administration has provided Congress about the attack. Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed. After weeks of back and forth, Kerry had told the panel he could testify next month, and Issa agreed.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters on Friday that officials were “mystified” by Issa’s decision as well as his criticism that Kerry has obstructed the probe. It’s “hard to see how that’s accurate when we were prepared to appear,” Psaki said.
Republicans have accused the administration of misleading the American people about the attack, playing down a terror attack in the weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and then stonewalling congressional investigators.
Multiple independent, bipartisan and Republican-led investigations have been conducted in the nearly 20 months since the attack. Investigators have faulted the State Department for lax security at the diplomatic facility.
The House voted along party lines on May 8 to establish a select committee to conduct an eighth probe led by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.
In creating the panel, the House also required the committees involved in Benghazi investigations, including Armed Services, Intelligence and Oversight, to turn over all their documents within 14 days to the select committee.
That leaves that panel as the main congressional investigator, essentially ending the other probes, including Issa’s.
The top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee said Friday that his panel’s investigation focused on several statements about Benghazi that proved wrong, and he was satisfied with the military’s response that chaotic night.
“Given what the posture of the military was at the time, yes,” Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., the panel chairman, said in an interview taped for C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” that will air Sunday. “We are not a 7/24 rotation. We don’t have pilots sitting on the runway in their plane with the plane fully fueled and equipped with ammunition to run many different kinds of missions. We can’t afford to do that.”