There’s no language in the U.S. Constitution that prevents someone from running for Congress simultaneously in multiple states. -- Congressional candidate Allan Levene in an article Nov. 2
Crazy.
That’s how one constitutional expert described Cobb County resident Allan Levene’s plan to simultaneously run for the U.S. Congress in Georgia and three other states.
“I may be crazy like a fox,” Levene, a Republican, told us by telephone.
Levene, who lives in Kennesaw, recently posted an article on his campaign website claiming the U.S. Constitution does not prevent him from campaigning in multiple states. His plan is to run in Hawaii, Michigan and Minnesota.
Levene believes the only constitutional requirement is that he has to be a resident of one of those states before the general election in November 2014. He says he can run in numerous state primaries without living in those states. Levene said he only has to establish residency if he wins a primary and wants to be on the ballot for the general election.
PolitiFact Georgia first saw Levene’s claim on The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Political Insider blog. We wondered whether Levene is correct about what the Constitution says and does not say about candidates running for Congress in more than one state?
Several experts we interviewed said they had never heard of a candidate running for office in more than one state at the same time. We, too, were unfamiliar with any such situations by an aspiring politician. Our research showed Levene may be a fox in regards to this claim.
Levene was a late write-in candidate last year to unseat U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Marietta, who represents Georgia’s 11th U.S. House District, where Levene currently resides. Levene pulled 30 votes in 2012. Gingrey, who routed Democratic challenger Patrick Thompson, performed a little better, garnering 196,968 votes.
Levene wants to improve his odds next year. He read Article I, Section II of the U.S. Constitution and came up with his idea. It stipulates that a member of the House of Representatives must be an inhabitant of the state “when elected.”
“It’s like looking at a wall and the hieroglyphics and I saw an opportunity,” Levene, a self-employed information technology expert, said of the section. “Hopefully, it will work.”
One opportunity came when Gingrey announced his plans to run for the U.S. Senate in 2014, creating an opening, perhaps, for Levene. Maybe not. It’s a crowded field.
In case Levene loses, he’s hoping he’ll win the GOP nomination for a House seat in Hawaii, Michigan or Minnesota.
Levene, 64, said he’s too old to try the traditional route of “working your way” to Congress by serving on a city council or being mayor, then becoming a star in the state legislature before going to Washington.
Perhaps.
But doesn’t the Constitution prevent his four-state strategy?
Here’s the conclusion Levene posted on his website: “According to Article One, Clause Two you must inhabit the state when elected. Elections are held in November, not the primaries where the top contenders are selected, typically one Republican and one Democrat. A candidate is not elected at the primary; that election is the semi-final. Even if a candidate wins and no other party opposes him, the election is not official until November. So that one day in November tells the whole story.”
The Federal Elections Commission would not formally rule on the constitutionality of Levene’s plan, a spokesman said. Levene said he is awaiting approval from the federal agency on raising funds in multiple states.
Levene said he also contacted the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office about his plan. Spokesman Jared Thomas said his office contacted the state Attorney General’s Office for clarity about Levene.
“Mr. Levene will not be disqualified in Georgia as a candidate for Congress in the event he also qualifies in another state,” Thomas said via email. “If he, however, wins (the general election) in Georgia and one other jurisdiction, then we will assess from a Georgia law and U.S. Constitution perspective.”
We asked law professors from Duke University, Emory University, the University of Texas and the University of Virginia to interpret the accuracy of Levene’s claim.
The responses generally matched that of University of Texas law professor Joseph Fishkin, who said, “I think the guy is basically right about the main point — that you don’t have to live in the district when you put in your primary bid — just when you win the election.”
University of Virginia law professor Dan Ortiz added: “I don’t think there’s any constitutional problem there. It’s crazy. It’s, politically, a crazy strategy.”
To sum up, Levene said the U.S. Constitution does not prevent him from running for office in more than one state simultaneously. The one requirement, he said, is that he must be a resident of the state where he is running at the time of the general election. Several constitutional scholars agreed with his assessment.
Levene might have uphill political battles ahead.
But on his constitutional point, he’s a winner.
Our rating: True.
About the Author
