DeKalb NAACP decries permit approval for Confederate event at Stone Mountain Park

April 20, 2021 Stone Mountain - Memorial Hall (foreground) and Confederate Memorial Carving (background) at Stone Mountain Park on Tuesday, April 20, 2021. (Hyosub Shin / Hyosub.Shin@ajc.com)

Credit: HYOSUB SHIN / AJC

Credit: HYOSUB SHIN / AJC

April 20, 2021 Stone Mountain - Memorial Hall (foreground) and Confederate Memorial Carving (background) at Stone Mountain Park on Tuesday, April 20, 2021. (Hyosub Shin / Hyosub.Shin@ajc.com)

A Confederate Memorial Day event poised to return to Stone Mountain Park next month has garnered opposition from activists, including a local chapter of the NAACP.

After their permit was denied last year, the Sons of the Confederate Veterans received approval this year to hold their annual celebration in front of the mountain and its massive carving of three Confederate figures. The Stone Mountain Memorial Association, which handles event permitting at the park, denied last year’s application due to the possibility of “a clear and present danger to public health or safety” among the reasons.

In a Tuesday news release, NAACP DeKalb decried the permit approval and called for the Stone Mountain Memorial Association to reconsider.

“The permit issued to the Sons of Confederate Veterans continues the perpetuation of racial terror in America and should be revoked,” Lance Hammonds, president of NAACP DeKalb, said in the release. “We believe that Stone Mountain Park will never be a symbol of unity in Georgia until the Stone Mountain Memorial Association is prepared to tell the whole truth about the Civil War.”

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution previously confirmed that the permit application was submitted by Richard K. Straut, a SCV representative who’s also running for a seat in the Georgia Senate. He was also a named plaintiff in a 2021 lawsuit that sought — and failed — to re-erect a Confederate monument that had been removed from the downtown Decatur square.

The group’s Confederate Memorial Day event is scheduled to take place on Stone Mountain Park’s memorial lawn on the morning of April 30. Documents suggest up to 200 people could attend. The keynote speaker is listed as Martin O’Toole, a SCV member who is also a leader with the Charles Martel Society, an Atlanta-based white nationalist organization.

The Stone Mountain Action Coalition, an activist group that seeks changes to the park’s Confederate iconography, called the permit approval “tone deaf” in light of societal tensions over racial justice and white supremacy. Hammonds agreed.

“Germany does not allow the Nazi celebrations in that country because of the remembrance of the racial terror,” his statement said. “We need to work against this celebration to allow the racial healing in this country to take place.”

Stone Mountain Memorial Association CEO Bill Stephens said the annual event is usually “small and respectful” and “pre-event news coverage” and social media have more recently enflamed tensions. He reiterated that COVID-19 was a factor in last year’s permit denial, even though far-right militia groups and leftist counter-protesters had clashed in Stone Mountain’s streets a few months earlier.

“With the volatile nature of events of the immediate past and ongoing today, there is a clear and present danger to members of the (Sons of Confederate Veterans), potential counter-protesters, park employees and guests,” Stephens wrote in the denial for last year’s permit.

In lieu of last year’s ceremony, several dozen members of the Confederate group’s “mechanized cavalry” ultimately rode motorcycles around the park.

Stephens said First Amendment rights and state law that mandates the park be maintained as a monument to the Confederacy were factors that had to be considered when reviewing this year’s permit application.

“As we continue to move back towards a new normal,” Stephens wrote in a prior emailed statement, “we will begin to receive more requests for gatherings and parades from all quarters, and unless law enforcement intelligence issues us a warning of potential violence or a ‘clear and present danger,’ then we will err towards maintaining an open and welcoming environment.”