Education

Common Core: Understanding standards vs. curriculum. The what vs. the how.

By Maureen Downey
Nov 20, 2014
Kelley Brock is a Baldwin resident and former special education teacher and principal, who raised her children in Cherokee County Public Schools.

By Kelley Brock

Dan Ray, holds up a sign with other opponents of Common Core outside the Palm Beach County School Board offices before a meeting by the 11-county group,"The Greater Consortium of School Board Members," September 19, 2014, in West Palm Beach. (Greg Lovett / The Palm Beach Post) The battle against Common Core never gained the traction in Georgia that it did in other states. (AJC File.)
Dan Ray, holds up a sign with other opponents of Common Core outside the Palm Beach County School Board offices before a meeting by the 11-county group,"The Greater Consortium of School Board Members," September 19, 2014, in West Palm Beach. (Greg Lovett / The Palm Beach Post) The battle against Common Core never gained the traction in Georgia that it did in other states. (AJC File.)

The conservative sweep in the recent elections has got a lot of people talking about what it means for Common Core, but while many are talking about the fate of the standards, I don ' t think there ' s enough talk about what the standards actually are.

The biggest sticking points seems to be confusion over one major misconception. The Common Core State Standards are standards  and not a curriculum.

Now I know what many of the Common Core opponents are saying to themselves right now:  But the curriculum and the tests will have to be aligned with the standards, so essentially, the federal government is forcing a national curriculum on local school districts.

Let ' s put aside the fact that Common Core was initiated in large part by our own Gov. Sonny Perdue and voluntarily supported by dozens of other state governors.

It ' s important to consider the distinction between standards and curriculum and understand how much of an impact one really has on the other.

Allow me to illustrate with an example.

Let ' s say we believe all students in a district should know how to read an essay and determine the author ' s position and the arguments he or she used to support that position. That would be a standard.

In practical terms, the curriculum is how that standard is taught. The curriculum would essentially take into consideration the specific teaching materials, a lesson plan, and methods of teaching; things our teachers are trained to develop and implement.
So if our goal is to help students reach the above-mentioned critical thinking standard, one district might choose to create a curriculum that includes essays on say, the pitfalls of capitalism, how big government saved the Republic, and the virtues of universal health care.

It could call for class projects where everyone in the class works together and receives the same grade based on the final product. It might assign homework that requires watching MSNBC, and quiz students on last night ' s reading of the Huffington Post.

Or the district could choose another route.

Teachers could have students study essays on how free markets built this nation, pulling bootstraps and the American Dream, and the dangers of government dependency. Each student ' s project grade would depend on a popular vote by his classmates. And homework assignments, in this case, would require watching FOX News, with quizzes based on Glenn Beck ' s podcast.

Obviously these are extreme examples, but I think they make a point. A curriculum is not the same as a standard. Local districts and teachers have been free to develop their own curriculum to help their students meet standards.

Common Core doesn ' t change that. Getting students to understand an author ' s argument doesn ' t dictate the types of materials a district uses to teach and it doesn ' t force teachers into a particular lesson plan.

As a former school teacher and principal, and as someone who has participated in district accreditation, I ' ve seen first hand how setting clear expectations fosters higher-performing students, happier teachers, and more engaged parents.

That ' s what Common Core does.

Having these standards removes ambiguity and provides a blueprint for all schools to build a strong academic offering.

About the Author

Maureen Downey has written editorials and opinion pieces about local, state and federal education policy since the 1990s.

More Stories