Albany State presidential search shows need for greater accountability

The search for a new president at Albany State University has been an extensive and, at times, contentious process. As we reflect on this journey, we recognize both the progress achieved and the challenges that remain. Moving forward, it is imperative we continue to advocate for inclusivity, transparency and a bold vision that will elevate ASU to new heights of excellence.

The ASU Alumni Presidential Task Force expresses its sincere appreciation to the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and Chancellor Sonny Perdue for breaking the long-standing cycle of appointing interim leaders as permanent presidents at ASU. When the interim president, Lawrence Drake, was initially introduced as a potential candidate for the permanent role, many within the ASU community, more than 900 alumni and supporters voiced concerns regarding his qualifications, prior tenure at another institution and alignment with the aspirations of our esteemed university. These concerns were never a reflection of personal character but rather an expression of our unwavering commitment to securing the highest caliber of leadership for ASU.

Xavier M. Jones is the chairman of Albany State University's alumni presidential task force. (Courtesy)

With the presidential search now concluded, we extend our heartfelt congratulations to Robert Scott, who was approved Monday by the Board of Regents as Albany State’s president. He brings a breadth of experience spanning research, higher education and corporate leadership. We eagerly anticipate how his vision, expertise and strategic leadership will be applied to address the distinctive opportunities and challenges that lie ahead for ASU. Here are a few.

Lack of transparency and community involvement

While we acknowledge the inherent complexities of a presidential selection process, it is deeply troubling that this search was marred by the lack of transparency and insufficient engagement from key stakeholders: ASU’s students, faculty, staff, alumni and the broader Albany community. These constituencies deserved more than a peripheral role in a decision of such profound consequence for the future of our institution.

The Board of Regents should uphold the highest standards of openness, inclusivity and consistency in its governance processes. However, the lack of transparency in this search process raises significant concerns. We are aware of five highly qualified candidates who, in confidence, disclosed that they were not even granted an interview, calling into question the fairness and breadth of consideration given during the selection. This lack of openness compromised the validity of the search committee process. Regrettably, this search was shrouded in secrecy, which fostered frustration and eroded trust among ASU’s diverse stakeholders. Furthermore, it was particularly disappointing that our national alumni association president, Sharmagne Goff, seemed to not be privy to insights regarding the presidential search.

Expectations for ASU’s future

As ASU embarks on this new era, it is imperative that its leadership prioritizes academic excellence, student success and institutional advancement. The university’s future hinges on a holistic strategy that strengthens student retention and graduation rates, expands degree offerings and fortifies financial sustainability. The future of ASU depends on President Scott being a visionary, transformative and strategic leader capable of executing the necessary tasks in these crucial areas.