Politics

Did the royal wedding have a deeper meaning? The left wonders

NOTTINGHAM, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 01:  Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attends the Terrance Higgins Trust World AIDS Day charity fair at Nottingham Contemporary on December 1, 2017 in Nottingham, England. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their engagement on Monday 27th November 2017 and will marry at St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle in May 2018.  (Photo by Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
NOTTINGHAM, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 01: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attends the Terrance Higgins Trust World AIDS Day charity fair at Nottingham Contemporary on December 1, 2017 in Nottingham, England. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their engagement on Monday 27th November 2017 and will marry at St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle in May 2018. (Photo by Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
By Bria Felicien
May 18, 2018

1. No, Meghan Markle is not the 'modernizing' force Britain truly needs

From The Washington Post: "Modernizing Britain and its royal family should mean coming to terms with the past."

2. Meghan Markle and How the British Monarchy Became a Matriarchy

From New York Times: "It's increasingly the women of the House of Windsor who capture the public imagination. But no, not in a feminist way."

3. A woman of color joining the royal family is a big moment for Britain

From CNN: "Prince Harry is very much his mother's son."

About the Author

Bria Felicien is a published author and staff writer at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. She produces podcasts for the AJC.

More Stories