Politics

Three years later, ethics commission case goes to trial

By Aaron Gould Sheinin
March 30, 2014

Deep coverage

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has reported extensively on the state ethics commission, including its handling of campaign finance complaints against Gov. Nathan Deal’s campaign in 2010 and the ouster of top commission lawyers Stacey Kalberman and Sherilyn Streicker.

Since then, the AJC has kept close watch on the commission’s activities as it dismissed the most serious complaints against Deal and hired a new director, whose own conduct has come under fire.

Late last year, the AJC was first to report allegations from current and former commission staffers alleging wrongdoing at the agency. The FBI began interviewing current and former commission staffers after publication of those stories.

Timeline:

Nearly three years after she claims she was forced from office for investigating Gov. Nathan Deal’s campaign, former state ethics commission director Stacey Kalberman’s lawsuit will be heard in court.

Kalberman’s case against her former employer begins Monday in Fulton County Superior Court. The trial, expected to last a week, could feature such high-profile witnesses as Deal himself, as well as his private attorney, top Republican lawyer Randy Evans.

Kalberman’s lawsuit, one of three filed against the commission, has helped throw it into turmoil as depositions have revealed allegations that agency employees were ordered to remove or alter documents from the Deal case file and that the governor’s office handpicked Kalberman’s successor.

Filed under the state’s whistleblower statute, Kalberman’s case hinges on whether a jury believes the commission — which is responsible for overseeing how public officials raise and spend money and how the information is disclosed — punished her for aggressively investigating Deal’s 2010 campaign.

The principals in the case have all declined to comment, including Kalberman’s attorney Kim Worth, the governor’s office, the ethics commission and Attorney General Sam Olens, whose office will represent the commission.

Brandon Hornsby, an Atlanta lawyer who has represented whistleblowers for more than 10 years, said Kalberman should expect the state to cast her as a problematic employee.

“The employer is always going to attack the employee’s motives and integrity,” said Hornsby, who is not involved in the case. “I’ve never seen an employer say that what the whistleblower stated was true. They always deny it.”

Matthew McCoyd, an adjunct law professor at Emory University and a former assistant district attorney in DeKalb County, said Kalberman’s challenge is to prove that she reported a potential violation of state law, ethics or rules and fell victim to retaliation because of that.

In her lawsuit, Kalberman said she and her top deputy, Sherilyn Streicker, prepared draft subpoenas as part of the Deal investigation and presented them to the commission. Shortly after, she says, then-commission Chairman Patrick Millsaps claimed the agency faced a financial crisis and told Kalberman that her salary would be cut by 30 percent and that Streicker’s job would be eliminated.

Kalberman later resigned and claims in her suit that she had no choice because her position was untenable. Kalberman will likely claim that her resignation was what’s known as “constructive discharge.”

“She can’t say, ‘I reported the incident and they fired me,’” McCoyd said. “What she’s going to say is, ‘I reported the incident and then they took steps to make it where I could not remain in my position.’ ”

It helps Kalberman that evidence exists that commissioners took steps to identify her replacement before she resigned, McCoyd said.

Current ethics commission director Holly LaBerge testified in a deposition for the case that someone in the governor’s office called her to gauge her interest in the job before it was open. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution later reported that Deal’s office confirmed it was chief counsel Ryan Teague who called LaBerge after several commission members asked the governor’s office for recommendations.

“That could be compelling evidence to a jury,” McCoyd said.

The case has followed Deal for years, even though the commission dismissed major charges against his campaign. He was eventually slapped with a small penalty for technical defects on his campaign filings.

Now, Deal may have to testify in open court. The state has filed a motion to quash his subpoena, but Judge Ural Glanville has yet to rule on the issue.

If he does testify, it will likely be a boon to his two opponents in the May 20 Republican primary and to Democratic state Sen. Jason Carter, his likely opponent in November, said Kerwin Swint, a Kennesaw State University political scientist and former GOP activist.

“I undoubtedly think his opponents will use it against him, even if (the case) really is not about him,” Swint said. “But the optics are bad enough to where I’m sure it will be used.”

The governor, Swint said, is “pretty safe” personally from allegations in the case.

“I’m sure the governor’s office will make this point over and over again (that) this is about the ethics commission,” Swint said. “It’s not about the governor’s office.”

About the Author

Aaron Gould Sheinin

More Stories