Millions of immigrants benefiting from President Barack Obama’s executive actions could get a windfall from the IRS, a reversal of fortune after years of paying taxes to help fund government programs they were banned from receiving.
Armed with new Social Security numbers, many who were living in the U.S. illegally will now be able to claim up to four years’ worth of tax credits intended to benefit the working poor. For big families, that’s a maximum of nearly $24,000, as long as they can document their earnings during those years.
Some Republicans are labeling the payments “amnesty bonuses” — one more reason they oppose Obama’s program shielding millions of immigrants from deportation.
“I represent hard-working, law-biding Texans,” said Rep. Sam Johnson, a senior Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee. “I think these amnesty rewards, and that’s what they are, need to be stopped.”
Advocates argue that many of the immigrants pay taxes, so they should be able to claim the same tax credits as anybody else. Over the past decade, immigrants in the U.S. illegally have paid an estimated $100 billion in Social Security payroll taxes, even though few will ever be able to collect benefits, said Stephen Goss, Social Security’s chief actuary.
Obama has issued executive orders shielding about 4 million immigrants from deportation. Some were brought to the U.S. as children; others are parents of children who are either U.S. citizens or legal residents.
Republicans in Congress oppose Obama’s actions and are trying to use a funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security to overturn them. Democrats are resisting, resulting in a stalemate that is threatening to shut down the department.
Funding for the department, which oversees immigration enforcement, runs out Feb. 27.
The dispute over tax credits illustrates the complicated relationship that many immigrants have with the U.S. tax system. Social Security estimates that immigrants living in the country illegally work at about the same rate as the rest of the population, even though federal law bars them from employment.
In general, they are less likely to pay federal taxes. But those who do have been boosting Social Security’s finances for years.
How does Social Security know when it receives taxes from immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally? There is no foolproof method, Goss said. One way is by tracking reported wages in which the Social Security number does not match the name the agency has on file.
Some of these are clerical errors or the result of unreported name changes, But Goss estimates that a majority come from immigrants who have made up Social Security numbers or used someone else’s to hide their illegal status.
The numbers are huge.
From 2003 to 2012, the total was nearly $750 billion in wages. Tellingly, only 7 percent of these wages are ever claimed and credited to an actual worker, Goss said.
“We don’t enforce the Social Security laws, we don’t enforce the immigration laws,” IRS Commissioner John Koskinen said. “In fact, the reason illegal immigrants file taxes with us is they know we aren’t sharing that data with anybody. We treat it as taxpayer-protected information.”
Even if immigrants in the country illegally pay taxes, they are ineligible for most federal programs. They cannot legally get food stamps, unemployment benefits, Pell grants or federal student loans. They cannot get Medicaid, except for emergency medical services, and are ineligible for subsidies under Obama’s health law.
They can claim some federal tax breaks if they file tax returns. But until now, they were not eligible for Social Security, Medicare or the Earned Income Tax Credit, one of the government’s largest anti-poverty programs.
Obama’s executive actions will offer them Social Security numbers, which eventually could make them eligible for Social Security and Medicare. For Social Security, a worker generally must have paid payroll taxes for 10 years before qualifying for retirement benefits.
More immediately, the immigrants can take advantage of the Earned Income Tax Credit, or EITC. Last year, the credit provided low-income workers with about $70 billion.
The EITC is popular among conservatives because it rewards work — the more a recipient works, the bigger his or her credit, as long as total income does not exceed certain limits. It is popular among liberals because it provides cash payments to low-wage workers, even if they do not make enough money to pay federal income tax.
It is, however, a complicated program to administer and generates a significant amount of improper payments, according to the IRS’ own estimates.
Once the immigrants in Obama’s program get Social Security numbers, they can file tax returns claiming the EITC, as long as they meet the income requirements and can document their earnings.
They also can file amended tax returns for up to three years after they were originally due, which means they can claim tax credits going back as far as 2011. (Tax returns for 2011 were due in April 2012).
The maximum credit for families with three or more children is about $6,000, so some families could get as much as $24,000 in credits.
Koskinen said those tax returns would be processed just like any others.
“You have to do the same thing any taxpayer would do, which is you’re going to file a return, say this is what I earned, these are my expenses, deductions, whatever it might be,” Koskinen said. “You have to have the supporting documentation.”
Some in Congress are outraged.
“The administration may have blown open the doors for fraud with amnesty bonuses of more than $24,000 to those who receive deferred action,” said Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb. “This program severely undermines the White House’s lip-service to enforcing the law and would increase the burden on law-abiding taxpayers.”
Advocates for immigrants say that if immigrants are working and paying taxes, they should get the same benefits as other taxpayers.
“Let’s not forget that these workers receive the lowest wages for what they contribute to their communities and local economies,” said Ellen Sittenfeld Battistelli, policy analyst at the National Immigration Law Center. “What do we as a nation gain by further impoverishing them?”