According to recruiting “experts” — and I defer to Rivals and Scout in this area, much like I would defer to Mrs. Paul’s when it comes to being experts on seafood — Georgia Tech really stinks in recruiting.
Now, I’ve made it no secret that national-letter-of-intent day is my least favorite day on the sports calendar. It’s how I would imagine Christmas in hell.
This is all you need to know about the “experts” recruiting rankings: In real football last season, the Yellow Jackets finished No. 8 in the AP rankings and No. 7 in the coaches’ poll. That 2014 team that finished 11-3 and won the Orange Bowl was built on recruiting classes (2011-14) that Rivals ranked 41st, 57th, 85th and 47th and Scout ranked 46th, 59th, 72nd and 47th.
“We were recruiting a guy a week ago, and he was a two-star,” Jackets coach Paul Johnson said. “Now one of the schools in the top five is recruiting him and he’s a four-star — three days later. That’s how that works.”
Johnson signed 27 players, the biggest recruiting class of his tenure. He’s smart enough not to make any projections, but feels good about the players he signed, and as he jokes annually, “They all come highly recommended.”
Let’s not make this out that Johnson does so much more with less than most coaches because that would suggest the recruiting rankings were accurate to begin with.
Every player in this Tech class is rated a “three-star” by Rivals. No fours. No fives. No top 100s.
The class ranking: 37th by Rivals, 40th by Scout.
Damn good fish sticks.
This class includes 17 players from in-state, some potential immediate impact players on defense and four players who won player-of-the-year honors at school levels in their respective states (Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Louisiana). Most of the players committed before Tech’s season, but Johnson said the wins “helped keep the class together. We didn’t have as much of the negativity and the talk about flipping.”
Tech is riding momentum — everywhere except the rankings that don’t matter.
About the Author
