Georgia News

Governor’s office heavily lobbied on private probation bill

By Rhonda Cook
May 13, 2014

In the hours before Gov. Nathan Deal vetoed a bill last month that would have allowed private probation companies to keep secret some details of their operations, large e-mail campaigns were waged by powerful voices on both sides to sway the governor.

The 104 emails — obtained by the AJC — document the flurry of activity that started within hours of the governor saying he was concerned about the secrecy component of HB 837, passed on the final day of the 2014 session.
Supporters of the legislation said the bill would have helped the courts enforce sentences, while opponents warned it amounted to a gift to help shield the lucrative firms from more scrutiny.
» MYAJC.COM EXCLUSIVE: Read email supporting HB 837 and email opposing the bill (view documents)
“I’m writing today to ask for your help once again to stop for-profit private probation companies from gaining unprecedented power,” wrote Sara Totonchi of the Southern Center for Human Rights, which has represented some people who said they were threatened with jail if they did not pay supervision fees that were between $35 and $45 a month.

Other emails, mostly from state judges and solicitors, predicted doom if the bill was not signed.

“If defendants sentenced in misdemeanor case(s) who disappear are not subject to tolling, these defendants will be able to completely avoid their responsibility to the courts,” Atlanta Municipal Court Judge Gary Jackson wrote. “Every court order that is disobeyed …(is) a ‘slap in the face of justice.’ If misdemeanor sentences cannot be enforced in Georgia, then our judicial system will cease to exist on a realistic level.”

The probation bill was one of the few bills Deal vetoed, citing a lack of transparency. He was worried about the “red flags” raised in a recent state audit that found courts provide little oversight of private probation companies and the firms often fail to supervise the low-level offenders they should watch.
In 2000, Georgia cleared the way for private companies to supervise low-level offenders, claiming it freed up overburdened state probation workers while costing taxpayers nothing.

But records reviewed by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution earlier this year show some in the industry have pocketed large fees while, in at least some cases, doing little to supervise those under their watch. And despite promises that taxpayers would pay nothing to supervise the offenders, they have footed the bill when the probationers are arrested and jailed because they owe money to the company, not the courts.

A string of lawsuits argue the system effectively criminalizes poverty and that some companies have illegally forced offenders to pay for things, such as electronic monitoring and drug testing, beyond what was ordered by the courts.

But the urgency to make changes in the industry came after Judge Daniel Craig ruled state court judges, who hear misdemeanor cases, did not have the constitutional authority to toll a sentence, or stop the clock from running on a sentence of a probationer whom the private companies had said stopped reporting. Craig also ruled the private companies did not have the legal authority to conduct electronic monitoring of the probationers they supervise.

“I believe that this bill is the most critical piece of legislation we have had anything to do with as long as I’ve been a judge,” James Anderson, president of Council of Municipal Court Judges wrote in a message to colleagues that was copied to the governor.
What may have ultimately doomed the legislation was change that was pushed by the private probation industry. In the form that was ultimately passed by the Legislature, information from these companies - how many people they supervise, how much they collect in court fines, and the number of warrants issued for the arrests of those who abscond — would no longer be public.

“Public stuff needs to stay public,” Viveca Famber Powell wrote in an email to Deal. “Otherwise, these [private probation companies] will be nothing more than 21st Century financial chain gangs.”

Despite the claims of abuse of probationers, judges and prosecutors found themselves aligned with the industry.
“If judges no longer have the ability to enforce misdemeanor probation, our court system, prisons and justice system will be in absolute crisis,” the bill sponsor, Rep. Mark Hamilton, R-Cumming, and Clayton County State Court Judge Linda Cowen, president of the council of State Court Judges, wrote in a proposed article that was sent to the governor.

Judges and prosecutors had hoped to fix the problem with the legislation before the Supreme Court weighs in. The Supreme Court will hear in September an appeal of Craig’s ruling in the lawsuits against Sentinel Offender Services, one of the 32 private probation companies operating in Georgia.

C.R. Chisholm, the prosecutor in Athens-Clarke County State Court and president of the Georgia Association of Solicitors General, said the original bill would have fixed the flaws Craig found in the law, but after HB 837 had moved through the House and the Senate there “was a dog pile on that bill. We understand that’s where the problems occurred and why we don’t now have a law in place.”

About the Author

Rhonda Cook

More Stories