Local News

DeKalb may have paid for work not done

By April Hunt
Oct 7, 2013

HOW WE GOT THE STORY

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is digging into how contracts are awarded in DeKalb County, especially its water and sewer department. A special-purpose grand jury released a report in August after a yearlong investigation found evidence of widespread corruption in DeKalb contracting. Reporter April Hunt requested invoices on a troubled sewer plant expansion to see how the county had paid millions for shoddy work.

A TROUBLED HISTORY

DeKalb County agreed to pay the lowest bidder, Desmear Systems of Tucker, $7.7 million, to blast and clear away granite for an expansion of the Snapfinger wastewater treatment plant. Work was to begin on July 30, 2012, and be completed in nine months. But problems emerged almost from the start. Some key moments:

Everyone who pays to flush a toilet in DeKalb County has chipped in on $5.8 million that the county OK’d spending on a troubled sewer project – though some of the work paid for has yet to be done.

Invoices obtained exclusively by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution show that customers of the county’s water/sewer system – who are bankrolling a $1.35 billion system overhaul through increased rates – paid for oversight failures at every level of the $7.7 million excavating contract at the Snapfinger wastewater plant.

The engineer from a joint-venture firm hired to monitor the project as well as two high-level county workers, also both engineers, repeatedly signed off on the invoices without inspecting quality.

DeKalb is paying DeKalb Water Partners, the company overseeing management of all the overhaul projects, $15 million. Rudy Chen and Hari Karikaren, both assistant Watershed directors, earn about $114,000 and $119,000 annually. Among problems they missed:

• Monthly invoices that fail to mention problems now known, such as water quality violations and construction accidents.

• Payments for 100 percent of hauling needed – to the tune of $2.6 million – although the next line on the chart of progress attached to that invoice shows that more granite must be blown up to begin leveling the site. The county paid even though as recently as last week, huge chunks of rock had yet to be hauled away.

• Invoices submitted without any inspection notes, photos or other information that would indicate if the project was on target or where problems occurred.

“You would expect to see more detail,” said John Miller, a retired civil engineer and co-chairman of a citizen advisory committee for the $1.35 billion overhaul, who had not seen the invoices until contacted by a reporter.

The AJC began asking about the Snapfinger project and the company doing it after that company, Desmear, a small Tucker firm, was named in an August grand jury report that looked into corruption in county contracts.

The company’s president gave CEO Burrell Ellis the maximum campaign contribution, $2,500, as it was preparing to bid on the Snapfinger project. Ellis has since been indicted on 15 counts of bribery, extortion and conspiracy for allegedly pressuring vendors to contribute to his campaign and punishing those who did not give.

Neither the company nor its president has been accused of any crime. Ellis denies any wrongdoing. But Desmear’s contract was troubled from the start.

Even as it submitted regular invoices to be paid for work it said it had completed, Desmear admitted it would not meet the extended deadline of June 30, records show.

Officials pulled the plug on the job on Sept. 20, citing shoddy work that included a structurally unsound retaining wall meant to protect the plant expansion and several hundred nearby homes.

The most recent invoice and payment in July, the last monthly cycle before the AJC began asking questions, show Desmear considered the wall 44 percent done. The county paid $682,000 on a wall that it now believes may need to be redone.

“Frankly, I am appalled at that,” interim CEO Lee May said. “My commitment is we will get to the bottom of it, and this sort of thing will never happen on my watch.”

Based on the invoices, May has ordered an internal audit to match how much the county has spent with how much work has been done at the site.

The county is also reviewing steps toward firing Desmear. But May said officials have yet to decide how to address apparent failures from DeKalb Water Partners. Representatives from Jacobs Engineering, which leads the joint venture, did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Also unclear is what action the county may take against the two Watershed managers. May had pledged to fire wrongdoers but said Monday that he is still working to determine responsibility.

The potential loss of the managers could be devastating to DeKalb, too. Massive turnover in the past year included the Watershed director and his boss, the head of public works. They left just days before the county awarded the Desmear contract.

Chen, who oversees water/sewer technical services, is a 9-year-veteran of DeKalb. Karikaran has worked for DeKalb for seven years and heads the department’s public works division.

Sally Sears, the other co-chairman of the advisory committee, has asked the county to provide updates at its quarterly meeting this month.

The committee has two groups that might have spotted problems, or could have at least asked questions, if more information had been provided during its last meeting in July, she said.

“We do not want to be window dressing,” Sears said. “We want to concentrate on providing the additional oversight we know we need.”

About the Author

April Hunt

More Stories