Opinion

APS cheaters pay a steep price for refusing to accept responsibility

APRIL 14, 2015 ATLANTA Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter describes how the three former SRT directors were at the top of the chain when sentencing them. Former APS SRT Directors Sharon Davis Williams, Tamara Cotman and Michael Pitts were sentenced to 20 years, to serve 7 years, 2000 hours of community service and $25,000 fine. Sentencing continues for 10 of the 11 defendants convicted of racketeering and other charges in the Atlanta Public Schools test-cheating trial before Judge Jerry Baxter in Fulton County Superior Court, Tuesday, April 14, 2015. (Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Kent D. Johnson, Pool) APS cheating defendants were in no position to argue with Judge Jerry Baxter after refusing to admit responsibility and accept sentencing deals. AJC Photo / Kent D. Johnson
APRIL 14, 2015 ATLANTA Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter describes how the three former SRT directors were at the top of the chain when sentencing them. Former APS SRT Directors Sharon Davis Williams, Tamara Cotman and Michael Pitts were sentenced to 20 years, to serve 7 years, 2000 hours of community service and $25,000 fine. Sentencing continues for 10 of the 11 defendants convicted of racketeering and other charges in the Atlanta Public Schools test-cheating trial before Judge Jerry Baxter in Fulton County Superior Court, Tuesday, April 14, 2015. (Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Kent D. Johnson, Pool) APS cheating defendants were in no position to argue with Judge Jerry Baxter after refusing to admit responsibility and accept sentencing deals. AJC Photo / Kent D. Johnson
By Kyle Wingfield
April 14, 2015

"This thing was pervasive. It's like the sickest thing that's ever happened to this town."

Apparently without apologies to Gen. Sherman, thus did Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter summarize the rationale for prison terms, in some cases covering multiple years, for some of the former educators convicted of racketeering in the Atlanta Public Schools cheating trial.

If you thought one of the more remarkable spectacles in Atlanta's history couldn't possibly become any more circus-like, you should have tuned in to Tuesday's sentencing hearing. The exchanges between Baxter and the defense teams were heated at times. Only two of the 11 defendants found guilty accepted sentencing deals offered by prosecutors. The other eight appeared incredulous at being asked to acknowledge responsibility for what has been called the worst cheating scandal in U.S. history -- and being ordered to serve prison time and pay relatively large fines. (One other defendant, who recently gave birth, will be sentenced in August.)

Baxter's reaction to their incredulity was reminiscent of the righteous indignation that spurred former Gov. Sonny Perdue to order a full investigation into the cheating almost five years ago. Some of Baxter's most impassioned exclamations:

In the end, three former administrators each received 20-year sentences, with seven years to be served and the rest spent on probation; $25,000 fines; and 2,000 hours of community service. A principal will serve one year in prison, plus 1,000 hours of community service. Two teachers were sentenced to two years in prison, a $5,000 fine and 1,500 hours of community service -- when a lawyer for one of them started to ask how she was supposed to come up with $5,000 when she can't work, Baxter cut him off with an unsympathetic "I don't know."

Two other teachers got one year in prison, a $1,000 fine and 1,000 hours of community service. Another teacher who read an apology to the community and admitted her guilt as part of the sentencing deal got one year of home confinement plus a $1,000 fine and 1,000 hours of community service. The other teacher who struck a deal with prosecutors will spend his weekends in jail for six months, pay a $5,000 fine and perform 1,500 hours of community service.

That's a total of 28 years in prison, some $93,000 in fines and 14,500 hours of community service for those 10, with the 11th sentence still to come.

The rejections by eight defendants of unusual post-conviction sentencing deals appeared to be intended to preserve their right to appeal, which they would have waived as part of the deals. Some of them will have appeal bond hearings to try to stay out of jail while their appeals proceed. But it's hard to escape the fact that, if those fail, they could spend two years or more in prison while they make their appeals -- and yet, they could have been free much sooner under the deals they were offered. I also suspect a great deal of whatever public sympathy they might have enjoyed will have evaporated after the sentencing hearing.

But it is, of course, their right to appeal. And so it looks like we won't be rid of this saga anytime soon.

(Note: This post has been updated throughout with additional details.)

About the Author

Kyle Wingfield

More Stories