Georgia Voices

The lessons of Charlotte and Tulsa: There is no one "truth"

Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officers begin to push protesters from the intersection near the Epicentre in Charlotte, N.C. Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2016. Authorities in Charlotte tried to quell public anger Wednesday after a police officer shot a black man, but a dusk prayer vigil turned into a second night of violence, with police firing tear gas at angry protesters and a man being critically wounded by gunfire. North Carolina's governor declared a state of emergency in the city. (Jeff Siner/The Charlotte Observer via AP)
Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officers begin to push protesters from the intersection near the Epicentre in Charlotte, N.C. Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2016. Authorities in Charlotte tried to quell public anger Wednesday after a police officer shot a black man, but a dusk prayer vigil turned into a second night of violence, with police firing tear gas at angry protesters and a man being critically wounded by gunfire. North Carolina's governor declared a state of emergency in the city. (Jeff Siner/The Charlotte Observer via AP)
By Jay Bookman
Sept 23, 2016

Police officials in Charlotte, N.C. have refused to publicly release video of this week's controversial shooting of Keith Scott. Without knowing what is on the video, let me hazard a guess: If the video clearly exonerated  the police or strongly supported their official narrative, it would have been released in hopes of calming tensions. Unfortunately, based on accounts from law enforcement as well as from representatives of the Scott family, it does not provide many clear answers.

There are problems in the case beyond the video. Police officials have said that they came to Scott's apartment complex to carry out an arrest warrant against another individual, a person to whom Scott had no known ties. When officers saw Scott enter a nearby vehicle with a handgun, they confronted him and ordered him out out of the car. What happened next is still in dispute.

But North Carolina, like Georgia, is an "open carry" state.  It is perfectly legal to carry a firearm on your person, and police have no authority or reason to confront you or question you for doing so. You can argue the wisdom of such laws, but that's the situation that state legislators have chosen to create. In Georgia, thanks to gun activists, state law specifically forbids law enforcement officers from asking someone with a weapon whether they have a permit to do so.

Yet by the police department's own description, they confronted Scott because he was carrying a firearm. Was Scott brandishing the weapon in some threatening fashion? We don't know. But there's a real question about whether that alleged Second Amendment right to carry a gun in public extends to black Americans as well as white, and whether the National Rifle Association even cares.

What we do know is this:

None of the above cases tell us anything about what happened in Charlotte, but they have absolutely had an impact on the public response. For decades, black leaders have complained about unjustified killings and police abuse and had complained that law enforcement always managed to evade responsibility for its excesses. For decades, few outside the black community gave those complaints any credence. Only now, with the ubiquity of video, has the evidence emerged that on too many occasions, their complaints have been tragically valid.

It is also worth noting that under a law due to take effect Oct. 1 in North Carolina, police video can no longer be released to the public unless ordered by a judge. Gov. Pat McCrory, who signed the law, claims that it is necessary to protect the constitutional rights of police officers, but it is hard to understand how those rights can be threatened by release of video documenting their performance of public duties.

Six other important points:

About the Author

Jay Bookman

More Stories