Political Insider

Johnny Isakson says Dax Lopez deserves a hearing: 'I believe in the Constitution'

(Center) House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, works the crowd behind Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle (right) at the 54th Annual Wild Hog Supper, benefitting the Georgia Food Bank Association. Bob Andres, bandres@ajc.com
(Center) House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, works the crowd behind Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle (right) at the 54th Annual Wild Hog Supper, benefitting the Georgia Food Bank Association. Bob Andres, bandres@ajc.com
Jan 11, 2016

If you're a Republican incumbent running for re-election, the most dangerous shoals to navigate may be those Saturday morning meetings of GOP activists.

U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson was at the one in Marietta this weekend, flipping pancakes and taking polite but unfriendly questions from D.A. King, one of many conservatives in Georgia hostile to any accommodation for illegal immigrants in the U.S.

King has been very hot about President Barack Obama's appointment of DeKalb County State Court Judge Dax Lopez, a Republican, because of Lopez' past membership on the board of the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials. Some Republicans have begun pushing back.

King sent us the sound clip of his exchange with Isakson. We’ve transcribed much of it here:

King: “President Obama has nominated a man named Dax Lopez for a lifetime position on the federal bench from Georgia. Dax Lopez has stood against immigration enforcement like voter ID, acceptance of ICE detainers, and many other things that most of us conservatives describe as disqualifying him automatically…

“Do you really think that Dax Lopez is the best the Republican party can do as a nominee for the federal court?”

U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson/AJC file

Isakson: “I think the process we have as a country, in terms of confirming judges, ensures that you don’t have a runaway appointment system. The president nominated him. He was vetted to a certain extent by the administration. He’ll be vetted by the Congress of the United States. He’ll go through a process with the [Senate] Judiciary Committee. Then he’ll go to a vote by the United States Senate. That’s about the most arduous process you can go through.

“I have already submitted, just so you’ll know, every comment that’s come in, positive or negative – that’s already on record with the committee. So the committee has every bit of information – yours and other people’s as well. The process says the president gets the right to nominate. Congress gets the right to confirm. I believe in the Constitution.”

King: “But you have the ability to stop the process. Are you going to do that?”

A moderator attempted to step in at this point, but the senator waved her off.

King: "I do, sir."

Isakson: "Do you believe in your right to appear before a jury of your peers? I believe a judge deserves the same right to be studied and vetted and asked questions and deposed as any other American. If that happens we'll get the right information…."

Isakson said he had not made his decision on how he’ll vote if or when the Lopez nomination gets to the floor.

U.S. Sen. David Perdue was at Sunday night’s Wild Hog Supper to kick off this year’s session of the Legislature. He echoed much of what Isakson said:

"It's a very serious issue. We're about to appoint a judge that will probably be there in a decade or two. This is a very important nomination for me, and I'm going to be very deliberate and very careful. I've met with the candidate, and we're going to be talking about it when I get back up there. We should be making a decision on that in the next week or two, honestly."

***

Add U.S. Sen. David Perdue's name to the ranks of federal lawmakers worried about a state-level version of the First Amendment Defense Act.

"I think it's a federal issue because you have to have a standardized federal approach. That's kind of where we ended up. I understand why a state would want to get in and do that," said Perdue. "But you can imagine if you have 50 different versions, how you control that over 50 states?"

Perdue is among the federal sponsors of the bill, which some supporters say is intended to protect those who do not want to issue marriage licenses based on their religious beliefs. A parallel version of that legislation is set to be proposed in Georgia by state Sen. Greg Kirk.

Isakson aired his concerns about the approach last week.

***

Two names keep popping up on the list of the most likely contenders to run to replace the retiring Rep. Lynn Westmoreland:  State Sen. Mike Crane and state Rep. Matt Ramsey.

***

One of the more interesting Wild Hog Supper scenes we witnessed was a conversation between Gov. Nathan Deal and Clarkston Mayor Ted Terry.

Terry, who leads a DeKalb County city with deep international roots, was one of the most vocal critics of Deal's policy opposing Syrian refugees. Deal reversed the stance last week after an opinion by Attorney General Sam Olens that it was not defensible in court.

After a few minutes of back-and-forth, Terry reports that Deal invited him for a sit-down in the office. That should be fun.

***

We're ready for the session. Are you?

***

Todd Rehm was at the Saturday meeting of the Gwinnett County GOP. He quoted state Sen. Renee Unterman, R-Buford, giving this happy news: "We're scheduled to get out [of session] by March 24. It's gonna be 'turn and burn.'"

***

The Georgia presidential primary formally gets underway on Tuesday. That, according to Secretary of State Brian Kemp's calendar, is the earliest day for a registered voter to mail in an absentee ballot for the March 1 contest.

***

The reports aren't due for a few more weeks, but Public Service Commissioner Tim Echols reports he's raised more than $200,000 for his reelection campaign. He faces a Republican rival in Michelle Miller, a middle Georgia businesswoman and activist, who has been pounding the pavement.

***

Perhaps you noticed that Charlie Harper walked away from PeachPundit.com last week, taking most of that website's stable of contributors with him.

Harper is starting a new Internet venture:

"GeorgiaPol.com strives to be "the" media hub for news, analysis, opinion, and discussion of politics and policy in the state of Georgia. Hopefully that's a vision that is sufficiently broad, strategically focused, and necessarily flexible enough for us to be what we want to be today, and will need to be in the future…."

What makes GeorgiaPol different from the voice-of-conservatives PeachPundit? From what we can tell, a wider ideological framework:

"We" are a group individuals that represent the political spectrum in Georgia. Our background ideologies range from an Occupy Atlanta organizer to a Freedom Caucus apologist.

Clayton Wagar, one of the few writers left at PeachPundit, wondered out loud about the website’s future:

For the time being, things will be kind of slow around here. I've already had several folks reach out and offer suggestions. If you've got one for me, please let me know at clayton@peachpundit.com.

In the meantime, I beg your indulgence as we figure out just what the next chapter of Peach Pundit looks like.

***

AJC Capitol Insider Newsletter 

The Capitol Insider is your guide to what’s happening under the Gold Dome.

To subscribe, visit: www.ajc.com/newsletters/subscriptions. Login or create a free account, then check the box next to "Capitol Insider" and be smarter every single day.

About the Author

Greg Bluestein is the Atlanta Journal Constitution's chief political reporter. He is also an author, TV analyst and co-host of the Politically Georgia podcast.

More Stories