The right wonders why the FBI needed an ‘insurance policy’ in case of a Trump victory
Is President Donald Trump right about the corruption from within the FBI? A roundup of editorials Wednesday takes a look at the issue.
Opinions from the right:
1. Is the 'Never Trump' media colluding with the FBI?
From Patrick Buchanan: Has the investigation into Russian collusion morphed into a Trump witch hunt? It sure seems like it.
Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein has said the Trump presidency is tainted, not the FBI https://t.co/ShgdxFwKGI pic.twitter.com/FfJ71wd6Xk
— Newsweek (@Newsweek) December 27, 2017
From The Hill: You should ask yourself what “insurance policy” the FBI needed in the case of Trump’s election, and if you may very well need one yourself.
John Sununu: FBI investigators have refused to answer certain specific questions about Russia dossier which has led to suspicion https://t.co/FHD8oXu0uj
— New Day (@NewDay) December 27, 2017
3. Was the Steele dossier the FBI’s ‘insurance policy’?
From The National Review: We don’t yet know if Trump colluded with Russians, but we seem to have abundant evidence that the Obama administration colluded with the Clinton campaign.
