The right is asking just who is investigating the investigator when it comes to Mueller
As the methods Robert Mueller’s office has used in investigating Russian collusion claims are challenged, should someone be investigating the investigators? A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the issue.
Opinions from the right:
Plots thicken in the FBI Russia investigation
From The Orange County Register: With allegations of a tainted investigation swirling, the American people deserve to know what the special counsel’s office has been looking into.
GOP senator: FBI agent's political text messages don't taint all of Robert Mueller's investigation https://t.co/52LkWQmjQ5 pic.twitter.com/FanuqpyoS3
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 18, 2017
Mueller has a partisan pack of wolves and an illegitimate investigation
From The Hill: Wait, just which scandal should we be looking at?
Mueller investigation obtains thousands of Trump transition emails https://t.co/WsVg7vXiLA
— Engadget (@engadget) December 18, 2017
Was the Steele Dossier Used to Obtain a FISA Warrant Against Trump’s Campaign?
From The National Review: Did the government use a fraudulent document to get a warrant to investigate Trump?
