Political Insider

The Catholic absence in this year's 'religious liberty' fight

031715 ATLANTA: Members of the clergy participate in a rally at the Capitol against SB 129, the "license to discriminate" legislation pushed by Sen. Josh McKoon and Rep. Sam Teasley on Tuesday, March 17, 2015, at Liberty Plaza in Atlanta. Curtis Compton / ccompton@ajc.com Members of the clergy participate in a Tuesday rally at the state Capitol against S.B. 129, the “religious liberty" legislation pushed by state Sen. Josh McKoon, R-Columbus. Curtis Compton/ccompton@ajc.com
031715 ATLANTA: Members of the clergy participate in a rally at the Capitol against SB 129, the "license to discriminate" legislation pushed by Sen. Josh McKoon and Rep. Sam Teasley on Tuesday, March 17, 2015, at Liberty Plaza in Atlanta. Curtis Compton / ccompton@ajc.com Members of the clergy participate in a Tuesday rally at the state Capitol against S.B. 129, the “religious liberty" legislation pushed by state Sen. Josh McKoon, R-Columbus. Curtis Compton/ccompton@ajc.com
By Jim Galloway
March 18, 2015

We are in the second year of a fight over religious liberty and who needs protection from what at the state Capitol.

But this year is not a replay of last year, because no two political confrontations are alike. Alliances change. Circumstances, too.

Most would say the biggest difference is a U.S. Supreme Court that has edged ever closer to constitutional protection for gay marriage. Pending high court arguments, plus a decision likely this summer, have lent a certain air of desperation to both sides of the cultural struggle.

But there is another, fresh factor this year that has been largely overlooked. His name is Pope Francis – though it is unlikely that our House speaker will demand that the pontiff apply for a lobbyist’s badge. Francis is no Grover Norquist.

About the Author

Jim Galloway, the newspaper’s former political columnist, was a writer and editor at the AJC for four decades.

More Stories