Things to Do
Movie sequel overload?
When Hollywood execs find something that works, they just can't help but milk that cow dry. But when it comes to movie sequels, when is enough enough?








![In his review of 1997's "Anaconda," Mark LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle said: "[It] is about a snake that eats everybody. That about says it all." Despite glowing reviews like that one, Hollywood execs greenlighted three followups, two of which were made-for-TV, which seems a more appropriate venue for these films. Would you like to see another film in the series, perhaps with J.Lo reprising her role from the original flick?](https://images.ajc.com/resizer/v2/3C3XNFU2TQCGRPXUAHWSVCMOQM.jpg?auth=683cdedc9107fec4dfb18f4cc8d192a8a66c9daac371182d49d823d9ab7b3803&width=3840&height=2680&smart=true)






1/15
You'd think having the word "final" in the name of a movie would preclude it from having a sequel, much less four, but you'd be wrong. The release of "Final Destination 5" is in keeping with a trend of sequels this year. In fact, one in five films out in 2011 is a sequel. In honor of this, we'd like to know which movie sequels you could do without.
Today's Gallery Headlines




