Opinion

Obamacare critics: Wrong on the law, wrong on the facts

27 March 2012 – Washington, D.C. – Protestors for and against President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law rally in front of the Supreme Court building in downtown Washington. The court is currently hearing testimony on the legality of the law and will rule on its constitutionality in June. Photo Credit: Kristoffer Tripplaar/ Sipa USA (Sipa via AP Images)
27 March 2012 – Washington, D.C. – Protestors for and against President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law rally in front of the Supreme Court building in downtown Washington. The court is currently hearing testimony on the legality of the law and will rule on its constitutionality in June. Photo Credit: Kristoffer Tripplaar/ Sipa USA (Sipa via AP Images)
By Jay Bookman
June 29, 2015

Within minutes of the Supreme Court’s decisive 6-3 ruling to uphold Obamacare and thus prevent wholesale chaos in the health-insurance market, Republicans began reading from the same discredited if familiar script.

U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter of Savannah complained that the ruling did nothing about “the devastating impact of this train wreck of a law.” Sen. John Cornyn of Texas lamented that “Obamacare has been a disaster for the millions of hardworking American families who have seen their health care costs skyrocket or lost their insurance entirely.” Sen. David Perdue claimed that as a result of Obamacare, many Georgians are being forced to work part-time by employers trying to sidestep the law. And Sen. Johnny Isakson, like his colleagues, promised “to repeal and replace Obamacare,” a refrain they have been singing for more than five years now.

Replace it with what, you ask?

They still have no idea. Even in the House Republican and Senate caucuses, Republicans can’t reach a consensus on what to do about health care because reaching that consensus would require that they compromise. And compromise -- even compromise with their fellow Republicans -- remains too difficult.

You’ve seen and heard the rhetoric. Here are the facts:

None of those points is in dispute. None can be contradicted by data. And that’s why you don’t hear data, only apocalyptic rhetoric, from the law’s opponents. They don’t have the facts on their side. And as a conservative-dominated Supreme Court said last week, they also don’t have the law. Without the facts or the law, they are reduced to hollering.

Republicans do have one thing in their favor: They still control the House and Senate. If they want to prove their critics wrong by passing an actual working alternative to Obamacare, they have the theoretical power to do so.

However, I would not advise holding your breath.

About the Author

Jay Bookman

More Stories