Opinion

Keep the lights on in Cuba. Help its people and avert a migration crisis.

The United States can expand its energy market and bring stability to an island that is experiencing blackouts most of the day as well as government instability and uncertainty.
People illuminate themselves with their phones while playing dominoes as a fire set up by residents protesting against prolonged power outages burns on a street in Havana, Cuba, Thursday, May 14, 2026. (Ramon Espinosa/AP)
People illuminate themselves with their phones while playing dominoes as a fire set up by residents protesting against prolonged power outages burns on a street in Havana, Cuba, Thursday, May 14, 2026. (Ramon Espinosa/AP)
By Juan A. B. Belt and Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado – For The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
June 13, 2026

This summer promises to be hot and unforgiving for the people of Cuba. The island’s power sector is in a systemic collapse, decades in the making.

Blackouts have averaged between 12 and 20 hours a day for the past couple of years, and this has been exacerbated by the loss of Cuba’s oil imports from Venezuela against its need for 60,000 barrels per day.

The result of this most recent setback is a vicious cycle: blackouts leading to economic contraction, less revenue resulting in less fuel availability and maintenance to the existing infrastructure, worsening blackouts leading to mass migration (25% of the island’s population has left since 2020), less capital available for investment, and we repeat the cycle.

Turning up the heat on the Cuban government is the growing prospect of a U.S. intervention under the Trump Administration. However, whether the change on the island is internal or external, a political transition will not succeed unless the national power system is first stabilized.

We cannot rely on the hope that private investment will magically appear and solve the issues already at play. Mass migration to the U.S. (primarily South Florida) and economic chaos are the most likely outcomes of inaction on this issue.

Six solutions to improving the energy crisis

Juan A.B. Belt is the president of International Finance and Economics LLC.  (Courtesy)
Juan A.B. Belt is the president of International Finance and Economics LLC. (Courtesy)

To that end, we are suggesting that the U.S. government take the following steps to ameliorate the situation before any engagement with Cuba:

U.S. can expand economic interests and keep the island stable

Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado is the president of Miramar Associates Consulting. (Courtesy)
Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado is the president of Miramar Associates Consulting. (Courtesy)

This serves U.S. interests by mitigating the risk of chaos that could fuel a mass migration crisis on the island.

U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters would gain a new market 90 miles from Key West, and American oil and gas, nuclear, and renewable energy engineering, construction, and management firms will win contracts. Multilateral development banks will provide guarantees that will assuage concerns from private investment, also meaning that there will be no direct U.S. appropriations to finance the energy generation.

For Cuba, it addresses an immediate need to generate electricity to support the island’s livelihood and to stabilize its economy after a long period of distress and isolation.

Bringing Cuba into closer cooperation in the energy sector is a win-win proposition for both Cuba and the U.S.

Perhaps it portends a new kind of relationship between these hemispheric neighbors — one that is finally based on trust, mutual respect, and reciprocity.

Failing to address the immediacy of this challenge will almost certainly create further distress and higher human and financial costs, here and there.


Juan A.B. Belt is the president of International Finance and Economics LLC. Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado (Ph.D., 1998, University of Georgia) is the president of Miramar Associates Consulting. Both have written extensively on Cuba and Latin American energy development over the past 25 years.