Welcome back to the UGA Mailbag, where each week we invite readers to pick our brain (ha!) about Georgia football, UGA athletics or whatever springs to mind. This week we do some true-false predictions on Georgia stats and win totals this season, questions about Jacob Eason, redshirts, leadership and scheduling. But the overhanging concern of many fans, justifiably, remains the offensive line, so we tackle that first:
Amidst all the speculation about the overall improvements that might come in the second year under a new coaching staff, what’s
your take on the specific importance of last year’s shift in blocking philosophy from zone to man? Was that fundamental change
an underestimated aspect of last year’s blocking issues? If so, might it be a big source of improvement for this year?
– Paul in Atlanta
This is a very good point, and one that hasn’t gotten quite enough attention, and I’ll blame myself for that. A quick explainer: Man blocking is just what it sounds like, where O-linemen are put in one-on-one battles with defenders. That’s what Georgia went to Sam Pittman arrived. Zone blocking is also largely what it sounds like, but it’s more complicated – it gives you chances to cut block legally, for instance – but in a simplified sense, you’re zoning up your blocking scheme.
Here’s the rub … Man blocking only works when you’re big enough to sustain blocks and win one-on-one blocks. Last year Georgia had a smaller line, so it lost a few of those one-on-one battles. So yes, it may have been more beneficial to be a zone-blocking team.
But Pittman and Jim Chaney wanted to install their system, which is a man-blocking system. So essentially they took a short-term hit for what they hope is a long-term gain. This year, with what is shaping up to be a bigger line, we’ll see if there’s improvement.
Our OL struggled last year and many had hopes of the newcomers breaking into the starting lineup. Are they struggling or have
the returning players gotten better or does the staff just not trust the young players yet?
Nobody should be worried about the freshmen yet. Not even close. It seems some fans had unrealistic expectations about these guys starting right away. The last true freshman to start the opener on Georgia’s offensive line was John Theus in 2012, and the last time two freshmen started more than half the year on the line was 2008, when Cordy Glenn and Ben Jones did it.
Now, the season hasn’t started yet, so who knows we may go out there and a couple of them start. But if it’s “only” Andrew Thomas, with Isaiah Wilson, Netori Johnson and Justin Shaffer all on the two-deep, that’s a pretty good start. And by the way a second freshman will also be starting: Solomon Kindley, who’s a redshirt freshman. So is Ben Cleveland, who is in the mix at right tackle.
Then let the season play out, and see who things shake out.
Allan Harvey of Phoenix, Ariz.: You did a great job with your over/under predictions prior to last season. Let’s see how you
do with the following true/false predictions for this season.
1) Jacob Eason will complete more than 60% of his passes. False. But had to think about it.
2) Terry Godwin will be the leading receiver and obtain over 750 receiving yards. True. But not 1,000 receiving yards.
3) Georgia’s offense will pass for over 3,500 yards. False. Georgia’s passing offense will improve, but 3,500 would be an improvement of nearly 1,000 yards. I don’t see that yet.
4) Georgia’s offense will rush for over 3,000 yards. False. That’s also asking a bit too much for an offense that only had 2,486 last year. But I could see this happening more than I could the 3,500 passing yards.
5) Georgia will finish in the top three in SEC scoring defense. True. Alabama and LSU should be in their usual perches, but after that it’s wide open, and Georgia’s front seven is so good, I’ll take a flyer and say it happens.
6) Georgia will win at least 11 games (including the post-season). False. Not that I would be shocked, but if I had to pick today I’d say this is a 9-3 team.
7) Georgia will win the SEC East. True. Am I very confident in that? No. But I give the Bulldogs the edge over Florida and a Missouri-like team that comes out of nowhere. (But not Missouri.)
NOT QUITE-LIGHTNING ROUND
Why is everyone so critical of Jacob Eason, who just had the best freshman year of any QB in UGA history, and by the way suffered
from 30 drops by WRs while behind an awful O line? I think his comp % would have been about 60% without just 20 of those
drops. Some of the worst OL and WR play I’ve ever seen. Where do you see his numbers this year? I’d say 62%, with more
TDs and also more Int.
– Dave Guhde
Whoa there. Aaron Murray and David Greene had better freshman seasons – though if you’re saying Eason had the best season of any true freshman, then I’d probably have to do more research. Thirty drops may be overstating it a bit too, though perhaps not by much.
Either way, Eason by his own admission wasn’t as accurate as he needed to be, particularly downfield. He locked in on receivers a few times, and rushed some throws. Those are all things that could be termed freshman mistakes, and if he corrects those I could see a big season. My expectation this year is for moderate improvement, and considering his freshman year was solid, that could mean a pretty good sophomore year.
Solomon Kindley got in on one play last year (even though he was still able to get a redshirt). Mecole Hardman was a 5-star
and lost his redshirt but didn’t really contribute much last year and is now playing on the other side of the ball. With so
many highly touted freshman this year contributing mostly as depth and Kirby’s inexperience as a head coach, is there any
concern that we’ll burn redshirts this year that will look like bad managing a couple years from now?
Those are two situations that I think even the coaching staff will grant weren’t handled perfectly. Luckily they were able to petition the NCAA for relief on Kindley. And in Hardman’s case it may have been a lost year, but who knows, if you get three good years out of him at receiver, it may turn out he wouldn’t have been around for that fourth one anyway.
As for going forward, Georgia being at the full 85 scholarship limit may indeed create some tough decisions to make. Some guys may not be on the two-deep at their position but will be too good not to use somewhere, like on special teams. Nate McBride at inside linebacker springs to mind. Imagine someone with his size and track speed hurdling downfield on punt and kick coverage.
Upperclassman leadership is often an underrated preseason factor. What are your observations about the leadership of Roquan,
Michel, et al?
– Allan Harvey
Between my own observations, and what I’ve heard, those guys you listed are definitely front and center, and in Smith’s case that’s particularly impressive considering he was rehabbing for most of the spring. Smith is a vocal guy who tends to be the focal point among the defensive guys. Michel and Chubb are those guys on the offensive side, with Michel playing the vocal role, and Chubb the guy who doesn’t say much, but when he does, the room gets quiet and everybody listens.
How do you think the carries will be split between Sony and Chubb this season? Having one or both fresh in the 4th quarter
will be a great advantage.
Rather than carries, the word touches might be the way to describe it, as Michel could get more passes go his way, and in creative fashion. (Out of the Wildcat, a reverse, etc.) But in terms of pure run plays, if I had to guess on the distribution of carries this year, my guess would be 60 percent Chubb, 30 percent Michel, 10 percent Herrien/Holyfield/Swift.
This is of course barring injury. And there will be injuries, unfortunately. That’s just a fact of life at tailback.
Will my guy D’Andre Walker actually get a real amount of defensive snaps this season or is he going to waste away on ST again?
– KingoftheSouth, via DawgNation Forum
That probably depends on the definition of “real amount.” The move of Chauncey Manac to defensive line helps that. Walker is easily the third outside linebacker, but the first two are going to be hard to take off the field. If either Lorenzo Carter or Davin Bellamy is hurt, I don’t think the coaches will hesitate to put Walker in there – though they could also move Natrez Patrick outside.
You mention eye test a lot in evaluating players. In Summer camp, who has most impressed your “eye test.”? New or returning.
– Jon Crenshaw
I’ll spare you the obvious ones. (Nick Chubb, Jacob Eason, Isaac Nauta, etc.) There’s also been a lot already written about guys like Andrew Thomas and D’Andre Swift. But here are some under-the-radar guys who, in the limited time we have, look promising too: freshman OLB Walter Grant, WR Mark Webb, WR Matt Landers and junior RG Kendall Baker. … Not saying these guys are all going to play much this year, just saying keep an eye on them.
WHEN YOU WRITE IN FROM SWEDEN, CHANCES ARE I’LL USE THE QUESTION
Warning, non-Georgia question! I saw that Miami and our good ole former CMR are traveling to Arkansas State for a game this year! They played at App State last year. Why in the world would a program like Miami do that?
On a semi-related note. Has Greg McGarity ever addressed the idea of getting the auburn game back home on odd years to balance
our schedule attractiveness in the future?
– Med vänliga hälsningar, Nathan, Sweden
1-Miami has also scheduled a home-and-home with Toledo. Matt Porter, who does a great job of covering the Hurricanes for the Palm Beach Post, recently did a four-(!)-part series on their scheduling. You can read it here. Or a shorter story here. The short answer is that Miami’s budget isn’t that large, so these trade-off games make more financial sense than paying the huge guarantees these mid-majors are getting now (upwards of $2 million).
2-No, McGarity has not addressed that recently.
ANOTHER MIAMI QUESTION
Here’s a question about something other than X’s and O’s or recruiting on the eve of the season. Mark Richt is well thought
of by most of the Bulldog faithful, even those like myself, who believed he had done what he was going to do and a coaching
change was in order. UGA seems to hold a special place with him. His recent “good luck” tweet is the most recent example.
So I wonder, given the esteem most hold for him, once his coaching days are over do you see a scenario in which he might return
to UGA in some off-field role? Something in football operations, the Athletic Dept, some kind of “ambassador” role (whatever
that might mean)?
– John Wilson, Columbia, SC
Interesting thought. My reflex is to say no, mainly because he went home (sort of) to Miami, and he’s not a Georgia graduate. Steve Spurrier was a natural choice to do that for Florida considering all his ties there, even though he hadn’t been there a decade. Richt, on the other hand, is coaching now at the place he played.
That said, I’m sure Richt will remain active, time permitting, in the lives of his former players. The last time I spoke to him about the Paul Oliver Network, he said he would offer financial help and anything else to keep the network going. (Kirby Smart is doing his part to continue the network, from what I understand.) Richt also still has many friends and even some family here. His father still lives in Athens. So I think whenever he’s done coaching, and that might be a long time from now, he could still come around often and make appearances. But I don’t see any formal role.
AND FINALLY, AT LONG LAST …
Is Joe Flacco elite?
– Dawg19, via DawgNation Forum
It’s a shame it took this long for someone to ask this. No. He is not. Joe Flacco is absolutely not an elite quarterback. In my mind, elite means top five, maybe top six if the first five are really good. My list: Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Newton, Roethlisberger, Ryan, with a good next tier of Luck, Wilson and Manning and guys approaching are Cousins, Carr, Prescott and Winston.
After then … maybe Flacco.
Thank you. See you next week.
The post Mailbag: Georgia’s offensive line philosophy, season predictions, and more appeared first on DawgNation.
Support real journalism. Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today. See offers.
Your subscription to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution funds in-depth reporting and investigations that keep you informed. Thank you for supporting real journalism.