ajcsportstalk

By Matt

September 6, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this

uh, no!

By D

September 6, 2006 11:19 AM | Link to this

what’s wrong with the one we have now. It’s a waste of money.

By luvgamtns

September 6, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

Why?

By Travis L. Givens

September 6, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

I think he just want his HAND in it atleast 98%, UGH no.

By chad

September 6, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

If they do build it they’ll probably build it in a crappy, inefficient part of town like where Turner Field is. Just make sure that there’s no Marta train anywhere near the new site.

By Onion

September 6, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

What the hell is King Arthur thinking? If the Falcons were doing extremely well (i.e. making the playoff each year) and selling out every football game this would be a much different story. The fact that 23 new stadiums have been built in the past 14 years does not dictate the Georgia Dome being replaced. The vast majority of the stadiums, replaced were stadiums that those franchises originally started with and were in excess of 20 years old. If King Arthur is so hellbent on building a new stadium for the “FalCan’ts”, how about he get with his old buddies from Home Depot and get to work!

By Casey

September 6, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

I love the idea! And the weather in Atlanta is so nice in the fall, it should have a retractable roof so that they can still hold their basketball games, but open it for football! And please locate it somewhere with easier access to and from the interstate! Also, more parking please!!

By RDI

September 6, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

No way Atlanta needs another stadium. If Mr. Blank wants a new stadium, let him foot the bill for it.

If he does agree to build/pay for it, he can put it wherever he wants as long as it’s not in my backyard.

By Shaun

September 6, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

Yes, we need a new stadium, preferably one that is not downtown. When you visit other stadiums they are state of the art, the dome is old and needs to be used for other venues.

By ray

September 6, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

If we need a new place for the FALCONS to plag send to BF egypt.

By Dusty

September 6, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

Tell ol’ Arthur he can build whatever he wants if he’s going to pay for it. He’s got the money. He can spend what he was going to use to buy the Braves. You can put it north of downtown too. Only the northsiders seem to be able to afford to attend any of these games.

By Casey

September 6, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

ONION, They are selling out every game!

By Jodi

September 6, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

Why not? We are building new things everywhere else. Why not replace the old?

By Socrates

September 6, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

“Need” a new stadium? Rubbish! What Blank means is: “I WANT a new stadium.” He is a new owner, and he, like a child, is jealous of the toys that other children have. In this case, other zillionaires have sparkly new playpens for thir prized possession.

If he wants one, let him finance it himself. Other owners have done so.

If the powers-that-were had not been so short-sighted last century they could have built a facility that would not now even remotely evoke a a cry for New & Improved. (So much for a dome being a sure ticket for a slot in the Super Bowl “rotation.”)

But, if Blank doesn’t get what he wants, he’ll soon be stamping his little feet and threatening to move the franchise. Politicians for once need to grow a pair and not give in to such blackmail. Taxpayers should not fund a frivoulous geegaw for a rich man.

By K-Dogg

September 6, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

I saw this coming a mile away…just look at the most values of current NFL teams..the Falcons are almost dead last (31 out of 32 teams). The Dome has it’s good sides (the noise factor really gives our team a competitive advantage at home), but football was meant to be played in the elements.

I can foresee a new stadium with a retractable roof and a whole lot of suites (like other stadiums that have been built recently)…Arthur knows what he is doing. With a new stadium, he will be able to make a lot more money and guarantee a couple more Super Bowls for the city of Atlanta in the future.

I think it’s a great idea!!!

By Patrick Bradshaw

September 6, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

New stadium?? Sure! As long as Blank opens up his own wallet and foots the bill, he can knock himself out.

By Jewishcowboy

September 6, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

HELLO - We are in the South!!! YES!! Make it with PUBS and Retail around the new place. We Need to be outside!!! Lets do it before!

By Darryl

September 6, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

What the… ? I’ve heard stupid rumors, stupid ideas and stupid stories in the past, but this is got to be the most insane set of comments of all time. I’m sure he wants a new one, in North Fulton, built by the county and state of course, so his wealthy N. Fultonites friends don’t have to drive downtown. Arthur, if YOU BUILD IT, you can move the team up there, but don’t you come close to asking for OUR tax dollars to build YOUR overhead for you. Get real buddy !

By Tim McDaniel

September 6, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

Yes, I do think that we need it, unfortunately, Mr. Blank will probably want it downtown, where there is almost NO parking, We need to have a place where we can actually Tailgate at.

I live in Flowery Branch, and I have heard lots of people say that they would have went when the team was bad, but who wants to have to go ride Marta, and fight with all of the Traffic inside of Atlanta.

Hopefully Mr. Blank will dig into his own pocket and buy himself a big piece of land and have the city help him finance his own stadium. Snyder owns RFK and the Redskins are worth over a Billion now.

By Casey

September 6, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

The idea of a new stadium coming will attract top free agents!! … along with another Super Bowl for it’s opening year!

By BC

September 6, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

We don’t need a stadium - The Dome is very adequate. Why spend our money to enable him to become competitive.

By Duck

September 6, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

Why build a new stadium the dome is a perfect fit for the falcons personel.

By drdawg

September 6, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

Why not WIN and fill up the one we’ve got first?

By lt dan

September 6, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

He probably wants a blankity blankity stadium like the morons built for bidwell here in arizona

By Michael Brown

September 6, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

How about a new stadium for 4 Super Bowl wins by 2016? If he can pull that off, he can build his new stadium with taxpayer help. Otherwise, spend all of the money you want to build it with Mr. Blank.

By Shaun

September 6, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

K-dogg said it good….

By al

September 6, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

Didn’t we just build the dome? Daggone. Besides, it’s a jinx only every OTHER year.

By Drawing a Blank

September 6, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

I suppose he wants us to pay for it.

This guy has turned out to be your typicial self-absorbed sports franchise owner: independently wealthy but wanting John Q Public to finance his play pretties.

He could learn a lesson from his former Home Depot partner about how to give back and treat the public.

Note to opposing teams: Someone please tackle this jerk the next time he struts along the sideline before the game is over.

By Gary W Scott

September 6, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

Not no but, Hell no!!!!! we have a stadium

By shane

September 6, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

Flowery Branch looks like a good place for the new stadium!!!I have about 12ac that Mr.Blank can buy for a parking lot.

By Duck

September 6, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

Great comment.

By Bernie

September 6, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

Yes. The Georgia Dome is a relic from the past, a behemoth that kills any urban fabric near it. It should be leveled and replaced with a better, more pedestrian friendly, open air stadium. While the new one is being constructed, the Falcons can play in any number of the college stadiums near Atlanta, like the Bears did when Soldier Field was being renovated.

By HUCK FROM MARIETTA

September 6, 2006 11:32 AM | Link to this

as a season ticket holder, i see what’s about to happen: blank will have to secure funding for this project and what better way but to pass the buck to the fans by way of personal seat licenses (PSL’s). if i want to continue as a season ticket holder, i guess i would have to foot anywhere from $2500 to $10000 per seat, depending on where the seats are located… ouch! i might have to be watching the games on tv once the GA dome gets imploded…

By CK1

September 6, 2006 11:33 AM | Link to this

We don’t need a NEW stadium. The Georgia Dome is fine. It benfits everyone. So,no we don’t a new staduim.

By Casey

September 6, 2006 11:33 AM | Link to this

Some of you are worried about “the current stadium suits the current personnel”. Have any of you realized that 10 years from now when and if the new stadium is finished, most if not all of the current players will have retired.

By D2

September 6, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

Arthur… look around you… the games are sold-out, product revenue is high, and the fan base, FAN BASE, fan base does NOT = season ticket holders, fan base is from all of the Metro area. Don’t alienate your fan base… be bright buddy. Leave the new stadium talk outside, and don’t bring it up again. Ga. Dome may be 15 years old, but it still is a great venue for watching FB action.

By Boogie

September 6, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

First we need to build a tunnel for Marta to the new stadium site. Next we add a race track and Casino next to the new stadium for the other six months of the year.

Then the race track and Casino will pay for the new stadium and Marta Tunnel.

Everyone wins but the poor gamblers who would lose it anyway.

By boots

September 6, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

Go for it and build whatever Mr. Blank can afford!

By Doug

September 6, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

Blank is paying the price for the horribly run franchise that was the Falcons under the Smith family. They got hooked into a horrible lease deal with the Georgia Dome and Blank is stuck with it. Most (if not all) NFL teams own their stadium and collect all revenues from it. Revenue from the Dome goes back to the state. Blank is a smart businessman. He can’t continue to operate under this deal.

This isn’t the first time he’s mentioned a new stadium, either. But, as usual, the AJC is about the last one to pick up on things. He has said that he will not move the team to the suburbs, too bad for the land-owning gentry to the north. Who the hell wants to cheer for the Flowery Branch or Forsyth Co. Falcons, anyway? Traffic on 400 is worse than anywhere downtown anyhow…

By kreedham

September 6, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

If the Falcons can’t get out of their deal in 2016 then isn’t it a little early to be speculating on the need for a new stadium?

Do we need one? No Will he get one? Sure! Who will pay? Not A B.

By JustMe

September 6, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

Don’t we already pay enough Atlanta taxes? Doesn’t Atlanta Public Schools waste enough of our money?

No reason at all for another stadium. The falcons don’t sell out the current one. Even at the risk of losing the falcons, who cares? They haven’t produced a winning team in forever…

By Lake Rat

September 6, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

This is not news - 2016!?!?!? Mr. Blank will probably not be alive then, nor many of us who are reading this!

But, having said that, YES will need a new stadium. I am surprised he did not suggest a new stadium by 2010 - THAT would be news and doable. So Mr. Blank, the challenge is to get something done in YOUR lifetime!

By Brian

September 6, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

The dome is an AWFUL place to watch a game. There’s nothing worse than spending a fall Sunday afternoon inside of a permanent synthetic stuffy cloudy day (due to the transparent roof).

Football is meant to be played in the elements, not inside! Atlanta deserves an outside stadium like Nashville and Tampa Bay (minus the pirate ship). I hope we get one well before 2015 or 2016. As it stands right now, I’d much rather spend a day at Grant Field than the “Trendy Dome”.

By jc from indy

September 6, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

New Stadium: let’s see, Michelle gets hurt every season, they trade a good back for nothing, um I would say Atlanta needs a new team especially a new quarterback! =Now INDY COLTS deserve a new stadium which they are building. That’s usually what happens when you have a winning team. Falcons Suck!

By MrLiberty

September 6, 2006 11:39 AM | Link to this

If he wants to put up his money and take all the risks, then let him do what he wants.

You know that’s not what he’s talking about though. He will want Atlanta to foot the bill, float the bonds, and tax the citizens. Then he will want emminent domain to steal the land. Then he will want taxpayers and Marta to run new rail line or some other accomodation.

When I lived in Suwanee and the Falcons wanted gold-plated digs after their first Super Bowl visit, our competent and responsible mayor said “no.” He said that a town of 6500 citizens couldn’t afford what they wanted and he certainly wasn’t going to force everyone into debt for that. So the jerks in Flowery Branch took the bait instead - suckers!

We know that Atlanta will never have a fiscally responsible mayor, but let’s at least hope that in the case of a new football stadium the answer Mr. Blank gets when he comes with his hand out is NO.

By joe

September 6, 2006 11:39 AM | Link to this

I say keep the Georgia Dome and build a new stadium for the Falcons….That way the dome can still be utilized….If Blank can finace the majority of the new stadium, then I would have no problem pitching in. Atlanta needs to keep up with the Jones’s. have you ever been to a city without major sport franchises? They are dead…..so much revenue flows to the city from this team, it is ridiculous. I would like to see the stadium built north of the city…..It would help grow the city even further and the further development would lead to even further growth,,,,,Why not? He is talking about 10 years from now? Not next year…..Should we wait 10 more years, until the Dome is falling apart….I dont know I like the idea, or better yet, I like the begginning of discussions and proposals starting sooner rather than later.

By JustMe

September 6, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

The GA dome can do just fine with the college bowl games. Heck, we can lease it out to GA Tech on a regular basis for when they sell out their smaller stadium. We could even lease it out to UGA when they have sell out games also.

Who needs the falcons? Tell Blank to take a hike!!!!

By RK

September 6, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

Too bad, the Falcons are one of the least-valuable teams in the NFL. They play 8 games a year at home — is that worth spending 400 million? I can’t believe cities do this, like Charlotte building a new arena some 15 years after the first one was built. He wants a more profitable team, like the Skins and Danny-boy. In that case, though, they needed a new stadium to replace RFK.

By injuredplaya

September 6, 2006 11:41 AM | Link to this

Blank is playing John Madden video game in fantasy mode! How about building a Superbowl team first?!

By A

September 6, 2006 11:42 AM | Link to this

Absolutely Not!… the Dome is only 14 years old. What is wrong with making updates instead of starting over? And what is wrong with actually planning for the future a little bit? He’ll get a new stadium and it will be outdated in a few years. Maybe he should just move the Falcons out of Atlanta all together???

By Randy

September 6, 2006 11:42 AM | Link to this

As a season ticket holder to the Falcons for eight years, let me say this….THE DOME IS HORRIBLE!!! ATLANTA NEEDS AN OUTDOOR STADIUM.

What I don’t understand is why we can’t make “improvements” on the dome such as take off the roof. From my ignorant position, it seems remodeling would be cheaper than building a whole new arena.

By Stacy

September 6, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

Blank is just jelous that the Arizona Cardinals just built a new state of the art dome in Arizona. Arizona needed that stadium. Arizona had a open stadium that sat in the desert! Atlanta alreay has a great dome. And it is not like the Falcons are winning a ton of games anyway. This is just a rich mans’s game of who has the nicest stadium. Kind of like, who has the beggest yacht. What is he going to do…move the team if he doesn’t get a new stadium. He can have a new stadium, if HE PAYS for 100% of it.

By steve

September 6, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

The Georgia Dome is a terrible football stadium. They play football outside in Greenbay Wisconsin, yet inside on carpet in Atlanta. Yes, we need a new stadium. We never should have played in a dome anyway.

By koz

September 6, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

Yes - build it on the Southside we always get neglected.

By K-Dogg

September 6, 2006 11:44 AM | Link to this

I don’t understand this “if it aint broke, don’t fix it” mentality.

Yes - The Dome is sold out and there is a waiting list for season tickets.

BUT - The Falcons still aren’t making very much money (compared to other NFL franchises).

One BIG part of the problem is the current financial arrangement with the Georgia Dome. Arthur could put millions into fixing the Dome and making it a more competitive facility OR he can start from scratch and put his own stamp on the franchise.

If he builds and owns the facility, all the revenue from gameday operations will go to him. From a business standpoint, this is a no-brainer.

From a fan standpoint, sure ticket prices will probably go up…but guess what, we’re still paying a lot less than fans in other NFL cities. If you have season tickets to the Falcons, you’ve got yourself a bargain compared to other teams.

It is broke, my friends…and Arthur intends on fixing it.

By gseagle95

September 6, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

Falcons Fans please remember what this team/franchise was like pre-Arthur Blank! If he thinks this will help our team and city be better, then I trust him fully. Did he not take a fledgeling HOME DEPOT company to untold heights? I think so and the Falcons are headed in that same direction!! Let Mr. Blank deal his cards.

By joe

September 6, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

oh and one more comment…why cant he build it up north? what should it be like Turner Field> where if you walk down the wrong block with your kids you could get mugged! Like Yankee Stadium in the 80’s? I am sure North Fulton would glady take the new stadium…..restaurants would be built, hotels would fill up, revenue would come everywhere……build a new interstate….tax trucks on the tolls….watch how many businesses would close if the falcons left, north fulton would be glad to have it…and as far as ticket prices increasing…it is supply and demand. I have never been to a falcons game because it is too expensive, but I dodnt complain, I watch the games on tv. Should I expect tickets to decrease so I can go? And then what, complain when he doesnt resign big time players, or add improvements…..It is simple economics…If he can charge more and get away with it, god bless him.

We are privilaged to have the Falcons, lets keep them.

By D2

September 6, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

Shaun, K-Dogg has it ALL WRONG. If Arthur Blank wants to host Super Bowls, then he pay for the new stadium, if K-Dogg wants to host Super Bowls, then he build it, if YOU want to host Super Bowls, then YOU build it. Don’t use the power of police force to take money(taxes) from MY pocket to build a future warehouse, because YOU want to host Super Bowls.

Plus… he mentions more suites and etc, most are paid for by corporate sponsors and has NOTHING to do the NFL fans. There will ALWAYS be corporate sponsors, if you have a great product, you make great money. Look around the NFL, and you will see the Ga Dome is one of a VERY few that make great money without a Primary Named Stadium Sponsor, i.e., RCA Dome. Money is NOT the issue. Arthur just wants it in N. Fulton Period, that’s it. His move desires has nothing to do with the facility, but location. Do expect he will want one where the Ga. Dome sits now, nor even in the ATL city limits.

By kreedham

September 6, 2006 11:49 AM | Link to this

Randy…I was told by someone that should know that a retractable roof could have been placed on the dome for only an additional $50 million. Even just a few years after the dome was finished that was considered a deal but at the time it was too expensive to add so somewhere it was killed.

By Mark

September 6, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this

First - Onion, you need to read what you write. The Falcons ARE selling out every game with a waiting list and the Dome WILL be more than 20 years old in 2016 also. So what other points can you come up with Dimwit?

But, seriously, if Art wants to build a stadium when his lease runs out, go ahead. Use your money and you can keep the revenue. Even rent it to the bowl games, Tech and anyone else that wants to use it - just like the Atlanta Spirit is doing with Phillips.

As long as no tax dollars go to it - I could care less. The reason the Dallas’ of the world are worth more is because they OWN their stadiums which adds 100’s of million of dollars to their Net Worth. Apparently that is too big an issue for guys like Kincaid to grasp.

By Dave

September 6, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this

The Falcons need a new stadium about as much as we need more people driving on 285 during rush hour.

By Darren

September 6, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

The Dome is a horrible venue. It’s like a giant OMNI. Atlanta is so nice in the fall but yet we have a dome like a bunch of pansies. I would love a new open air stadium that is actually condusive to tailgating. Football is meant to be played outside in the crisp fall air, not in a freaking dome…

By Poor McKay

September 6, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

A. He’s probably beginning his negotiating for better revenue sharing when the contract expires.

B. He has shown a tremendous commitment to downtown Atlanta, so the chances he would want to build a stadium in some distant suburb is very, very unlikely.

C. Stadiums do not last forever and they don’t get built overnight. Why not plan 8-10 years out?

D. He obviously wants to host a Super Bowl in Atlanta and this is about the only way it will happen, with a new stadium.

By BlindHomer

September 6, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

Just make sure its paid for with ‘inside the perimeter’ property and sales taxes.

By Brad

September 6, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

When I saw the values of the franchises last week I knew that the Dome was behind the fact that Atlanta was near the bottom. The dome is only 14 years old. where would the new stadium be. I mean it has to be downtown, but their isn’t any property downtown unless they take it to the West End. The dome asthetically is an ugly building. I don’t think that it woul dbe a worthwhile investment to build a 300 million dollar facility that only has one use. That won’t fly in Atlanta. Maybe they will put it out here in Cobb County along with MARTA….

By War Eagle

September 6, 2006 11:53 AM | Link to this

well, if they build it up north and NOT in downtown no parking land then fine. It is a convenience to go to a game,park and know you won’t be hustled or attacked by gangs after the game. However, if it is downtown again-forget it! Build a 30-40K space parking lot and then 1000 luxury sky boxes and 50K premium seats. THAT should be suffice unless he wants to add a Personal Seat/Suite License. On another note, since local tv is prohibited from showing the product, let’s focus our attention on the Thrashers. Or, let the Falcons move to LA and we can concentrate on College Football.

By Jeff

September 6, 2006 11:53 AM | Link to this

Yes, this is long overdue. We live in an amazing climate and the dome takes away from that. It is more of a social setting at the dome. Let’s go back to the outdoor days of fulton county stadium and add in the present day perks. Long, long overdue.

By joe

September 6, 2006 11:53 AM | Link to this

Yeah who needs a new stadium?

That would just bring jobs, business, and bigger events to Atlanta

Who wants that?

I am sure the hotel and restaurant industry can survive on Band competitions…….

Why build in North fulton? That is too nice

We can stick it next to Turner Field, and have a 3 block walk between each to see if you can get from venue to venue without being mugged or panhandled

Thats a good experience for my children!

By 82DAWG

September 6, 2006 11:54 AM | Link to this

what is wrong with the current one? Not enough sky boxes for the filthy rich?

By grannyof3

September 6, 2006 11:54 AM | Link to this

Just another example of the Atlanta business community’s “built-in obsolescence” mentality. Why spend millions on something like the Georgia Dome, only to tear it down a decade later? What a waste!

By Jerry

September 6, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

Yes. The Georgia Dome is an eye sore. The artificial turf leads to pain and injury needlessly. Let’s build something with a retractable rood so we can grow grass the way the Lord intended.

Just destroy the Georgia Dome and make it the parking lot for the new stadium.

No More Domed Stadiums (NMDS) for a better tomorrow.

JW

By Stinky Sullivan

September 6, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

A DOME in ATLANTA? Stupid idea then, stupid idea now. Blow it up and lets have an outdoor stadium in its place.

The WOMEN will FLOCK to it!

SS

By mack

September 6, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

NO new stadium…how about new players

By Zora

September 6, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

I see based on most of the comments that most of ya’ll haven’t been to the Dome in awhile and haven’t been to other stadiums outside of GA. As a season ticket holder, I’m in there every FALCONS home game. We definitely need a new stadium as the current one is woefully inadequate and is quickly nearing, if not already past, its initial occupancy use. That is, it’s crappy! Either we need new one or the current one needs to undergo major renovations as does the majority of all of downtown Atlanta.

By joe

September 6, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

If 20 years is too early for a new stadium, then what is too old?

Should we wait until it looks like the Astrodome did?

By corey

September 6, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

I guess I’m not really surprised by the silly responses that go along with the “WE DON’T NEED A NEW STADIUM” replies.

Sure the Dome is decent…it works…

But it’s not conducive to what the reality of running an NFL team requires. The state of GA owns the dome, the Falcons get a small portion of revenue from it.

Even smaller markets like Jacksonville and Nashville have better deals with their stadiums. The teams are more profitable because they control advertising and sponsorship revenue in their stadiums.

In this day and age, selling out games doesn’t matter to the bottom line of a team as much as sponsorship dollars do. It’s just a basic fact of being able to keep up in the football business.

You can complain all you want, but it’s going to happen—and needs to. It would be a positive stamp on this city, the fans AND the Falcons rather than anything negative. Wait and see.

By dawgfan06

September 6, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

Building a new facility would be a waste. The GA Dome is not that old, a perfectly fine facility. If it needs to be upgraded, then do it. But do not waste tax dollars on builiding another arena. If Blank wants a new facility, let him build it HIMSELF!

By JT

September 6, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

It’s utter nonsense! But if Blank wants to do it then he should do it as long as HE pays for it and not the taxpayers.

By ScoobySnacks

September 6, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

In the article, Blank mentions wanting to build his own stadium. That is fine. As long as the money works out to where we tax payers are not bearing the responsibility and burden. As far as what is wrong with the Georgia Dome, the period we are talking is at least ten years away. By that time, the dome will be twenty-five years old or so. Rather seems reasonably. As with anything else, winning makes it all better.If we can get a few Superbowl wins between now and then and the money thing works out, I think it is a great idea and would gladly sign off on it. “If”.

By Will

September 6, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

I think now is the time to think about a new stadium. I don’t have an issue with the Ga. Dome, but in 10 years I will. The team has to be profitable to stay competive. I do think the owner should shoulder the bulk of the cost along with the NFL, not by passing the buck for the general public. I do think we need to put a championship team together and the support will be there. I also like the idea of a retractable roof so we could be outdoors when its nice and protected when things are ugly. Go for it Mr Blank! PS…just quit raising the cost of my season tickets until we have a winner out there please.

By Nads

September 6, 2006 11:59 AM | Link to this

How about…when the intestate highways in this city are upgraded to handle the capacity of the daily rush day, when there is an adequeate mass transit system in this city that is more extensive than a plus sign, when every commuter’s drive takes less than 1 hour from all points, when crime is under control in this city, when our kids are being educated better…then we can talk about another stadium for that pathetic franchise. Otherwise, I suggest let Mr. Blank open up his wallet and build himself a stadium.

By ScobySnacks

September 6, 2006 12:02 PM | Link to this

P.S. I have always loved the Falcons. But the G-Dome has always looked like cr@p to me. A big ice cream scoop in a pink cup. Makes the city and the team look soft.

By mike p

September 6, 2006 12:02 PM | Link to this

Heck yea we need another stadium. Every time I go to the Dome, I fear for my life! It is not safe. Move NORTH.

By ed

September 6, 2006 12:02 PM | Link to this

Some of you idiots can’t read. It says 2016 not 2007. Thats over 20 years old by then.

By ScobySnacks

September 6, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this

P.S. I have always loved the Falcons. But the G-Dome has always looked like cr@p to me. A big ice cream scoop in a pink cup. Makes the city and the team look soft.

By edge770

September 6, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

The stadium was built by the state, and it is drab, boring and does have a few design flaws, not excluding the lighting and sound system has been porous. I suggest that Georgia State/Georgia Tech use the facility. build the Southern Company Field either Douglasville or Forsyth County with Marta train, retractable roof. Blank required to put in 150 to 200 million with state and local putting in rest. Also make area around stadium as weather neutral as possible to land Superbowl. and have facility with color, passion, multimedia and high tech. No, don’t see King Arthur, see as a visionary businessman that realizes Georgia Dome was built on the cheap, and it’s starting to show.

By Michael

September 6, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

If Blank wants to put a new Falcons stadium somewhere, I can suggest nowhere else besides Spaghetti Junction. The GM plant there is closing and I’m not sure if the Kia deal was ever completed. The Doraville MARTA station is there (which means the Gwinnett bus line is hooked to it) and you have the obvious road connections. Silverbacks Park is located about a mile from the GM plant and it’s a VERY accessible area. Sure, there would need to be some “re-development” of the area, but this thing is ten years away.

Key ingredients for any new stadium: 1) Larger capacity (85-90k) 2) Retractable roof. Everybody says they love watching football in the elements…except for when they actually have to watch it in the elements. At least 3/4 of all games are played at 1 p.m. Noooo thank you. 3) Parking lots. Give the tailgaters enough space to tailgate. Don’t go Michael Adams on the fans. 4) Surrounding amenities. Build a hotel, nice restaurants, fast-food restaurants, gift shops, etc. nearby. Basically elaborate on what CNN Center provides you at the Dome and Philips Arena. 5) If at all possible, natural grass and FIFA soccer dimensions. The area missed out on the 1994 World Cup thanks to no suitable soccer pitches. Just make the field wide and long enough (like the Patriots) and be ready for another U.S. hosting of the tournament.

By John

September 6, 2006 12:09 PM | Link to this

That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. I love sports but the Dome will still be in excellent shape by then. UGA, Georgia Tech, Auburn, Tennessee and colleges in the SEC play in stadiums that have been around for 60 plus years. Why us the NFL different. Tell the Falcons to build their own stadium or move elsewhere.

By KM

September 6, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

It’s about time a new stadium is being discussed. Football/Baseball should be played outside in the elements. I don’t attend Falcon games during the day because the weather is too nice to be indoors. Throw up an outdoor stadium and I’ll get in line for tickets. Go Aurther!!!

By Lew

September 6, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

What does he mean “we” can’t compete. What he is saying is he wants to control the revenue from the DOME. OK, assume the debt and you can have the revenue, but the taxpayers are not going to build you another stadium. If he wants an outdoor stadium, then we can just take the roof off and plant grass.

By pale padre

September 6, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this

Here we go again. Laying the burden on non-sports fans/taxpayers. Take up a collection from sports fans and leave the rest of us out of this. Or let corporate bigwigs dig into their pockets and pay for it from their bonuses.

By Alex

September 6, 2006 12:15 PM | Link to this

There is a God! The Falcons need to move out of that Dome as quick as possible and into a Stadium outside of 285. The Dome is one of the worst NFL stadiums. We are in the south…we should be playing on grass!

By Jeremius Shakazulu Abul El-Alamin Muhamid

September 6, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

Can they not build it in the ghetto this time?

By brent

September 6, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

I have been to several stadiums, and the dome is one of the finest facilities in the country. If Blank wants even one tax dime, then he can move the team.

By Dan

September 6, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this

If Arthur Blank wants to pay for it then by all means he should get a new stadium.

Arthur has more $$$ than Danny Snyder and the Redskins did not build their new stadium with govt handouts. I say this as a diehard NFL fan - giving govt handouts to build a sports palace for a billionaire NFL owner is obscene - hopefully governmet will have the courage to stand up to this latest money grab by pro sports. Let the NFL owners pay for their bread and circuses rather than expect the taxpayers to foot the bill.

By Mdawgkish

September 6, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

The stadium needs to be replaced and put somewhere away from all the filth in downtown. I went to the Jags Birds preseason game, went to HE Holmes marta station and the fist thing we see is a grown man urinating in the parking lot, on the way into the station got approached three times by beggers (crackheads). On the way out had to carry my son to keep him off the broken malt liquor bottles. Build a venue in the burbs where decent hardworking citizens live so we can enjoy the games in an outdoor enviornment and can actually tailgate without having to watch your back for gangbangers?

By RK

September 6, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

Atlanta needs a great soccer stadium, first! Get MLS here!

By Tee

September 6, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

Guys if we do not get a new stadium we will always lose the bid to host the superbowl every year, comparing other stadims to the dome we are old. Blank will definately not ask for your money becos he will definately want to be like the other owners use is own money to build so he can have total control of the stadium. I love the dome but feel we need a facility that can win a superbowl bid.

By Mike

September 6, 2006 12:20 PM | Link to this

Why do we need a new stadium. These rich owners thionk everything should be rebuilt every few years at taxpayer’s expense. Let him by the land (not using eminent domain) and build it himself. They always want the taxpayer to pay for the rich kids arenas and Atlanta and every other government around here has much more pressing needs than that.

By Slow Play

September 6, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

Who gives a rat’s a$$?!?

By boots

September 6, 2006 12:24 PM | Link to this

So Mr. B, the brilliant businessman, got screwed on the stadium deal? I’m sure he did his due diligence. So what’s the problem? He’s learning that to live out your fantasies —- being able to stand on the sidelines and talk trash with the gladiators is expensive. So, let him do what Joe Robbie did when he felt he was getting a raw deal from the City of Miami and the Orange Bowl. He got the financing and built it himself.

By dj

September 6, 2006 12:26 PM | Link to this

I understand the retoric regarding a new stadium from Mr. Blank, but feel that if a new deal needs to be negotiated, then so be it. I can’t see spending a billion bucks of taxpayer money to build a new facility. If Mr. Blank wants one, he should pony up and pay for it. Out door football? Of course. In the rain and unpredictable weather in Jan for a Super Bowl? ugh ugh. Let’s follow Arizona’s lead….

By Mike

September 6, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this

Mr. Blank, great idea! This will also allow the GWCC to expand and bring more revenue to our city! Ignore the simple minds please. Oh, and can you put the new stadium close by the Dome, like across N’side Drive (MARTA + D’town + Beltline)?

By Ray

September 6, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this

They should have built a retractable dome in the first place.

By Phalcons Phan

September 6, 2006 12:30 PM | Link to this

Hell yes. We need a new stadium with a retractable ceiling. Hopefully if they do put it on the current site someone will also redevelop the area into a place that is clean and feels safe after dark. It would be great for the city and the events it would attract.

By JMar

September 6, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

By 2016, I absolutely hope a new stadium is in place. Better experience for the fans, better location, more major events like the Super Bowl, more money for Blank.

By Nikki

September 6, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

Yes! I will come. Yes. The birds do need a new stadium that is team-friendly as far as generating revenue.

By Doug

September 6, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

To add another comment…

I’m amused by our northside residents angling to have a new stadium brought out to the suburbs. How the hell do you propose that happen? With no real public transportation (No, those buses are no suitable) past Sandy Springs, you mean to tell me that 70,000+ are supposed to get there via 400? I’d love to see that one. Hell, forget building parking lots, just spread out and start tailgating on 400.

By Jay

September 6, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

With the GA Dome only being 14 years old, I can’t see the justification in building a new facility other than envy. And as a taxpayer there are far better ways to spend my money. KC, Buffalo, Miami and Green Bay all play in stadiums far older than the Dome and don’t have any intentions of moving.

Is the financial arrangement bad? Yes, but maybe thats something which Blank and the state can work out. I know alot of people loathe the roof but it does allow the facility to be used more than 8 times a year. Installing a retractable roof would be nice but it would be a very expensive proposition, somewhere around 200-300 million dollars, approximately the cost a of new stadium.

The only way a new stadium gets built is if he foots the bill. I just hope he keeps it downtown, b/c I’d be applauded to have to go see the birds play in N. Fulton or worse, Cobb County.

By emack06

September 6, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

You sound like an idiot. How the heck you know what people who live south of atlanta can afford? I live south of Atlanta and I’ve been a season ticket holder for over 4 years. Your comments just shows your racist point of view. Dont Sleep.

By DLC

September 6, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

NO. This game of “one-upsmanship” among sports team owners has got to stop. IF he wants a new one, build it with the team profits… if he hasn’t enough money, then wait… maybe his team isn’t as popular as he’d like us to believe. Is it SRO every game? I doubt it. Lastly, the one we have is fine; even by 2016, it’ll still be fine. These sports businesses need to be self sufficient- NO “welfare” off the backs of taxpayers. Atlanta has too many real problems to spend it’s tax revenue on than a new stadium.

By al

September 6, 2006 12:34 PM | Link to this

What thuh? Didn’t we just build that dome? Daggone! What happened to patience? Besides, it’s only jinxed EVERY OTHER YEAR.

By Josh

September 6, 2006 12:35 PM | Link to this

For those concerned about taxes…hell, why not just slap a hotel/rental car tax on the tourists? Make them pay for it.

By gdawg72

September 6, 2006 12:36 PM | Link to this

Lets face it the Georgia dome was a great idea, but they botched that place from the start. I mean come on, that place is U-G-L-Y, it aint go no alibi…yeah thats right its UGLY! Teal and fuscia? Who came up with the color scheme, its sickening mix of pastel and beach condo decour. No retractable roof? I mean Atlanta in the fall is next to perfect for football weather and the falcons have to play in a serilized, pink and teal covered dome on tuf. What could be better than watchin our boys in a red and black open roofed natural grass stadium with downtown atlanta as the backdrop. The Dome has a great name…the rest is junk. Get your stadium Arthur, do it right this time. The fans and the players deserve it.

By Dan

September 6, 2006 12:37 PM | Link to this

It is a great idea, it is a shame to have indoor football games in Atlanta in the fall. Those that whine and complain about costs need to enroll in an economics course

By Pillsbury Doughboy

September 6, 2006 12:37 PM | Link to this

I like the Georgia Dome. What a jerk!!! Why don’t you bring us a winning football team. Atlanta needs a performing arts center before it needs a football stadium!

By Floyd

September 6, 2006 12:38 PM | Link to this

King Arthur can kiss my black a s s.

Try stringing some winning seasons together and stop rewarding your employees for being idiots and then you can ask for some some assistance.

You ain’t gonna get it but you can ask.

F you dude.

By JimmyJam

September 6, 2006 12:40 PM | Link to this

Heck yeah, I would come. The location of the current Georgia Dome is terrible, is not conducive to tailgating, and you better be far away from North Ave. after the game. Bring the new place out to the the suburbs, where, by the way, most fans are commuting to the game from anyway, away from Marta and the panhandlers. Turner Field is another time and story.

By Mj

September 6, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

Atlanta does NOT need a new stadium. And as a taxpayer, I certainly don’t want to see my money spent that way. As an Atlanta native, I have had my fill of seeing perfectly good structures torn down because our leaders seem to think that if it’s not new, it’s no good. A new stadium goes right on the list of other things we can do without: new strip malls, new ‘lofts,’ etc. “New” is just an excuse to raise rents/fees/prices/etc.

By Ralph

September 6, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

Perhaps Art will call upon his Home Depot buddies. Last I heard, You can do it Art, they can help. Perhaps he will build it himself and use home depot contractors and supplies.

By john b.

September 6, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

We really don’t need another stadium. Sell it to Arthur, let a whole bunch of orange aprons come in and make it the way he wants it. IF he’s got the money to build a new one, let him fix up the existing one to his exacting standards!

By B.

September 6, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

Wow, I can’t believe so many people are against this. Most people I know hate the dome. Its ugly, there’s nothing state of the art about it, the concessions suck, the parking sucks and it should have been an open stadium all along.

My parents had season tickets for Falcons games for nearly 15 years before the dome was built. We kept them for about 2 more years and then they got rid of them because they couldn’t stand the dome. I have been waiting for this moment since they built the dome.

Out with the old in with the new. Hooray for Arthur Blank!

Just remember to plan for parking and tailgate areas. The gulch sucks too!

By GW

September 6, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

While they are planning and financing a new stadium for 2016, go ahead and make plans for a new one in 2030 too. By 2030 the 2016 model will be obsolete and the Falcons will be dead last in revenue again. 31 out of 32 NFL teams in revenue? Where does an NFL team need to rank to avoid bankruptcy?

By emack06

September 6, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

The Dome is cool, its in a perfect location. However, I would slap a retractable roof on the Dome. Buy up the surround land and make a hugh parking lot for the fans and only charge them 5-10 bucks to park for any event. The people who owns the parking around the dome is just ripping off falcons fans.

By michele

September 6, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

If he pays for it with his OWN money and demolishes the GA dome then OK

if he wants to increase ticket prices and public funding to pay for it and leave the old one as an eyesore then NO!

By Headhunter

September 6, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

Hey Doughboy, a performing arts center would is a DRAIN on the economy. A sports arena is a BOOST to the economy.

I think the new stadium should be built right at the intersection of I-285 and I-85. That way I won’t have to endure the urine-soaked nightmare that is downtown ATL.

By Joe

September 6, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

Ft. McPherson would be a great location. MARTA access, lots of real estate, central location.

By Keon Johnson

September 6, 2006 12:55 PM | Link to this

We don’t need it. It is still state of the art. I wonder where they would put it. He says that he wants it to remain where it is. Here’s the quote from the article, Wednesday’s comments weren’t the first time Blank has mentioned a desire for a new home. In an interview with the AJC’s Mark Bradley in July, Blank said he hoped to build his own stadium. Now if this literally means he plans on building the stadium himself…well that’s fine with me. However, I don’t think that’ll be the case. After the bonds are paid, maybe the state can give the team a more financially beneficial deal. I don’t see the need or benefit of a new stadium except the bragging rights of being the new stadium. Mostly likely with the donation of the Georgia Aquarium etc.. I’m sure the state will be unusually open to given Mr. Blank whatever he asks for… I am curious as to where it would go though… Would it stay where it’s at local area, will they be with out a stadium for the construction period, and would they keep the old while the new is being built…will they leave that area? I could see the stadium in the same area or at Atlantic Station just off the top of my head. People are concerned with traffic… We’ve all been here long enough to know that Atlanta and Georgia are NOT concerned with traffic. We are concerned with profit and more profit.

By DeanH

September 6, 2006 12:55 PM | Link to this

Year 2016.. New stadium cost… $1.2 billion one lower level ticket per game… $1524.. Thanks Mr blank… Are you out of your mind…

By jp

September 6, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

Why should Mr. BVlank be punished by playing in an outdated, dirty, dingy facility when the Braves, Thrashers and hawks all play in a state of the art facility. I agree with him….if we are going to be a top 10 city, then lete’s make sure the Falcons have a Top 10 place to play!!!

By Robert

September 6, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

Give us a Super Bowl and you can have a new stadium.

By Frank

September 6, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this

Sure build a new stadium have Blank build some place near Waycross

By BP

September 6, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this

In business…before one raises their prices, they need to make sure that their product is top notch. The Falcons are far from Top Notch. If this proposal does go through, I hope that they build this stadium in a caucasion part of town. For too long, minorities have been displaced for sports venues which will host events that they cannot afford to attend. Then the minorities(who are left in the area) must hear the complaints of the well to do fans who come to the games.

Mr. Blank…if you must have a new stadium, I hope that you pay for it out of your own pocket and I also hope that you build this stadium in your own backyard.

By Mario Dizon

September 6, 2006 12:59 PM | Link to this

As long as taxpayers money is not involved, Mr. Blanks can build whatever he wants to. Let him build the Taj Mahal of football stadiums with his his own money if he wants to.

By Lance

September 6, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

HELL YES WE NEED IT! You morons who say we don’t need it, get a life. By the time 2016 rolls around, the stadium we have now will look like a dump compared to everyone else’s stadiums. Why are people so affraid of growth with new and updated technology and surroundings? REMEMBER, 2016. By that time, Atlanta will need it!

By Smiley-22

September 6, 2006 01:01 PM | Link to this

Hey Arthur, There is plentiful land right across from the Dome now, acres and acres and the marta is right there! Hey now I’m just a real estate agent trying to make a little money too! And think about it, the royalty split the Falcon’s have now, is absurd. Retractable roof would be nice as well! Go Falcon’s, let’s just hope we have a good season, that is all I am really worred about right now!!

By Onion

September 6, 2006 01:01 PM | Link to this

Ok Mark, How about you kill the personal attacks. I admit that I mistated that the Falcons are not selling out. They are; however, everyone needs to acknowledge that in this town where we have very few REAL sports fans and ticket sales, NOT actual attendance is what everyone counts. I am a betting man and by week four of the NFL season Blank seats will be showing up in droves to the Georgia Dome. Once again, what’s the point of building a new stadium if you cannot fill the existing one.

Regarding it being in 2016 when he wants the new stadium. That would make the dome 24 years old. What’s the big deal. Look how long Lambeau and other great stadiums have been around. The real problem is that most stadiums are owned by government entity resulting in a lack of proper maintenance (LOM) situation (look at the City of Atlanta school system). The only reason the Dome will have to be replaced in 10 more years is because the owners did not do the maintenance.

By Corey

September 6, 2006 01:02 PM | Link to this

If they do build it they’ll probably build it in a crappy, inefficient part of town like where Turner Field is. Just make sure that there’s no Marta train anywhere near the new site

Chad, would you and your neighbors agree to have it built down the street from your house? People in pooer neighborhoods usually don’t have a say when decisions are made to build sporting facilities in their neighborhoods. And people like you will always cry, “Not in my back yard!”

By jc

September 6, 2006 01:03 PM | Link to this

The ONLY football worth noting is played on Saturdays….. Uncle Arthur… pay for it yourself! Don’t expect us here in the city to pay for your Sunday entertainment.

By me

September 6, 2006 01:03 PM | Link to this

There is nothing wrong with the Dome. Can we try to fix the roads around Atlanta first? Blank’s honeymoon with the city of Atlanta is about over, if the Falcons do not make the playoffs.

The bottom line Blank knows how to market a product, not how to run it. Except his idea of the new helmet which looks like an AFL2 design

Bernie was the true brains behind Home Depot. Which is why Lowes is better since Bernie left HD.

Also, why not make that statement at Falcons’ HQ, not at a luncheon.

By ch

September 6, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this

Why not as long as he use his money and Chad are you jealous, why not marta? is save on gas.

By CJ

September 6, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this

By 2016, the Falcons will need a new stadium so that it remains economically justifiable for Blank to own the team. At the point the dome will be almost 25 yrs old and the revenue stream for the Falcons from the existing lease arrangement will be terrible.

By ed

September 6, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this

Let Blank build it. He made off like a bandit from Home Depot after leaving the company on the verge of collapse.

By john

September 6, 2006 01:09 PM | Link to this

atlanta needs football outdoors. i hate the dome. retractable roof!

By Steve

September 6, 2006 01:12 PM | Link to this

Why? The Falcons can lose just fine in the stadium they already have.

By CRB

September 6, 2006 01:15 PM | Link to this

The Dome sucks.

I’d never buy Falcons tickets and attend games in the Dome. But if they had a real outdoor stadium I’d think about it seriously.

By BELIEVE1

September 6, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

Thank Goodness someone else see’s that football in Georgia needs to be played Outside! Build a new stadium and please have a retractible roof. The new Cardinals Stadium Rocks… the field sits outside 360 days a year and then is moved into the stadium. Thanks Mr. B… Your the best thing to happen to my Falcons!!!

By INSANITY

September 6, 2006 01:19 PM | Link to this

We can’t fund transportaion but are expected to build new stadiums every twenty years????

If he expects taxpayer money NO. NO! NO NO!

Some want to spend a half billion dollars for 8 home games. Just to have a “competitive” football team. To aid a Billionaire???????

Just say no to corporate WELFARE.

By ken

September 6, 2006 01:20 PM | Link to this

Win a superbowl, then maybe think about a new stadium.

By Chuck

September 6, 2006 01:20 PM | Link to this

People are starving, homeless and in despair, but we need to spend millions - maybe a billion - on a new stadium?? Get a grip!!!

By Roger

September 6, 2006 01:21 PM | Link to this

The Dome was never that good to begin with. 10 more years and its going to be as bad as Fulton County Stadium was. With all the new stadiums and ones on the way, Atlanta stands almost no chance of getting Super Bowls again. A new state of the art facility built right will pull in not only super bowls, but hell maybe even another Olmypics, Final Fours, College Bowls, tons of trade shows, and everything else in the world. This could become an entire new life line of money for the city. Is it a gamble? Yes, but does it stand a VERY good chance of working? Yes, why? Because Atlanta is a Southern Hub. If downtown was laid out worth a damn and we had a proper infrastructure we could easily be as great as NY and LA.

I think Blank has proven he’s willing to do whatever he has to as owner to make the Falcons a winner. Can you really ask more of an owner? He has to have hope and plan for the future. I’d rather have him than some rich bum who never does anything for his team and doesn’t care where they play at.

Where are they going to put this thing? I don’t know, no one here has any clue so even guessing is dumb. But a giant new stadium, with a retractable roof, great parking decks and layouts, lots of bars, resturants, hotels, retail areas etc built all around it would instantly create an entirely new city in itself and along with that LOTS of jobs and revenue for the state.

By Blacksburger

September 6, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

Football is meant to be played outdoors. And the Dome is in a crappy part of town. Have it near the interstate with a ton of parking, and within 5 minutes walking distance of a Marta station, or get Marta to put something near it.

We DON’T need another Turner Field - Awesome stadium in a bad neighborhood with crappy Marta access.

Build the stadium somewhere desolate, and build around it. A la, Wrigleyville in Chicago. How awesome would that be?

Is there anywhere in midtown to put it?

By chris

September 6, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

Atlanta will need a stadium by 2015. Just think how old you will be in 2015. The dome is already old. I just hope that the stadium is built outdoors.

By the way, if Atlanta does not want to give Mr. Blank a stadium for all that he has done for the city of Atlanta, im sure that LA would love to have the Falcons.

By Phil

September 6, 2006 01:24 PM | Link to this

I’m sure the people of N. Fulton would love a new stadium.

There are no unincorporated parts of the northern county anymore, so which municipality do you think would approve one?

By JG

September 6, 2006 01:26 PM | Link to this

Dookie Boy…..don’t you have kindergarten today????? Grow up punk!

By Dirrtybird

September 6, 2006 01:29 PM | Link to this

The Dome is a piece of sh*t. It’s painted a “peach” color on the outside for crying out loud. How many teams do you think roll up to our stadium and are intimidated by a peach colored Dome? Zero. He’s planning for a stadium ten years from now. C’mon people in ten years, you don’t think it will be time for a new stadium?

By Anti

September 6, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this

Dookie boy. You are so smart and educated. I’ll bet you made it all the way to the 3rd grade. But this blog may be to “big boy” for you. Check out www.barney.com. I’ll bet it is more to your “level”.

By chris

September 6, 2006 01:33 PM | Link to this

By the way- Atlanta is the same city that wanted to sink Millions into a Nascar Hall of Fame.

By JimmyJam

September 6, 2006 01:33 PM | Link to this

Would someone give Dookie Eater a hug? He’s an angry little fellow who obviously is not even an Atlanta sports fan. C’mon Dookie Dude, don’t get mad, get glad!

By Who's the "little" guy named dookie?

September 6, 2006 01:33 PM | Link to this

Dookie boy. You are so smart and educated. I’ll bet you made it all the way to the 3rd grade. But this blog may be to “big boy� for you. Check out www.barney.com. I’ll bet it is more to your “level�.

By Jason

September 6, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this

Some things to consider:

The Georgia Dome was designed for use of more events than just football. That’s why it has a roof on it. The Falcons play at home about ten days of the year. For such a large and expensive facility to sit idle for the other 355 days is finanically stupid. Perhaps a retractable roof is the best solution.

If a new stadium is built, that doesn’t mean that the Georgia Dome has to go away. There are many that want Georgia State to start its own football program. With an enrollment larger than UGA or Tech and an increasingly more traditional student body, GSU certainly has the potential to become a quality D1A football power.

Public funding is what this is all about. When the Georgia Dome was built, it was one of the sweetest deals in th NFL. Other owners of course pointed to Atlanta and said “We need a better deal or we’re moving” and got the politicians to open the public treasury. Each deal gets sweeter and sweeter. It’s an arms race and those cities who refuse to play (i.e. Los Angeles) get left out.

Putting a new stadium on the north side would be incredibly short sighted. The south side is growing much faster than the north now that traffic congestion, crime, and all manner of other negatives have come to the northern suburbs. Blank moved the Georgia Force downtown because he knows that he needs to be at the population and transportation center of the metro. Putting a stadium in Woodstock would be great for the fans in Cherokee County but terrible for everyone else. Is Cherokee County really large enought to support an NFL team on their own?

By unknown fan

September 6, 2006 01:35 PM | Link to this

NO!, NO!, NO!, NO!

They are not doing so hot in the one they got now, and it was built to keep them him in Atlanta.

Quit kowtowing to bunch of Dingleberries.

By Help dookie leave!

September 6, 2006 01:37 PM | Link to this

Dookie just wants attention. Dookie just get off the computer and go back to your boy friend. I’ll bet he misses you. You have no clue about Atlanta, so bye-bye!

By ray

September 6, 2006 01:38 PM | Link to this

Lew, your right. Just take the top off and plant grass.problem solved.

By kitty

September 6, 2006 01:39 PM | Link to this

Mr. Blank can take his Falcons and build his new stadium anywhere he wants. As long as it’s not anywhere within 100 miles of Atlanta.

By Matt

September 6, 2006 01:46 PM | Link to this

…uh, okay. By 2016 Falcons tix will be in the $900 per seat anyway so, why not?
I’ll just stick with my beloved Dawgs for now and forever… I said it’s great - to be - a GEORGIA BULLDOG!!!

By Don

September 6, 2006 01:46 PM | Link to this

The Georgia Dome isn’t the problem. It’s the ownership and their inept management. The home stadium should only be in downtown Atlanta. For those of you who say downtown is unsafe or undesirable because of your fear of certain people, take this advice, STAY HOME IDIOTS.

By chris

September 6, 2006 01:49 PM | Link to this

You can really tell the people who do not have a real job. Dookie Boy is a good example of what happens when a child does drugs.

By andy

September 6, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this

We the fans will probably foot the bill for this one, much like Panthers fans for the most part paid for their stadium by buying PSL’s. We should emulate the Charlotte model because the people who use, profit from and enjoy the stadium are the ones who pay for it.

By wf

September 6, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this

Lets move the team to Athens. We could fill up a new stadium. Go Dawgs.

By michelle

September 6, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this

ARE YOU F’ING KIDDING ME? the ga dome is just over 10 years old!! maybe if we could actually contend for the superbowl i’d be up for it but until hell freezes over…er, i mean, we win one, THEN we can talk new facilities. jeez.

By Nikki

September 6, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this

Stop complaining, by 2020 we will probably need a new stadium.

By Raul

September 6, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this

A new Stadium???? UMMMMM…. NOOOOOOO

By brb

September 6, 2006 02:01 PM | Link to this

I can’t believe there are so many people freaking out about this. The article said they hope to have a new stadium in 2016, TEN YEARS FROM NOW!!!! This won’t happen tomorrow. Plus, nowhere did it say he expects the city or state government to pay for it. Relax, people.

By Seriously

September 6, 2006 02:02 PM | Link to this

The NFL is paying for the new stadium in LA not the taxpayers. Let the NFL pay for the new stadium Atlanta wants, otherwise I see nothing wrong with The Los Angeles Falcons of Anaheim.

By Dawgs2006

September 6, 2006 02:02 PM | Link to this

Yes! Please build in the burbs. At least when I am tailgating, I will not be bothered by low life homeless bums. They flock to a grill faster than a soup line. In Atlanta, they always build in the worst ghettos.

By nona

September 6, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this

I have no issue with a new stadium AS LONG AS THOSE WHO USE IT PAY FOR IT!! It’s not doing me any good and I don’t want to pay for it unless, as a portion of the price of admission, I pay my proportionate share as I use the facility.

Arthur Blank, the Falcons, and their staff are compensated VERY WELL to PLAY a game. We, the taxpayers of Atlanta and Georgia must work our tails off just to survive. Let Arthur buy the new stadium, he’s the one that benefits most.

By Bruce

September 6, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this

Yes. This is wonderful. I hope it is in the North Suburbs like Gwinnett county. That way the majority of Atlantas can attend a Football game without having to go inside the perimeter

By conyers

September 6, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this

no.

By Jeff

September 6, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this

Two plans should be looked at. Plan one would retrofit the Georgia Dome with a retracting roof and a complete overhaul and let Blank pay for most of that and in return, negotiate the lease to his favor, at least where Falcon games come into play. If that is not feasible, plan two would build a new outdoor stadium and build it in conjunction with Georgia Tech for their use as well.

By PSack

September 6, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this

BLANK PAYS HALF AND THE TAXPAYERS PAY HALF THE CONSTRUCTIN COST. BOTH PARTIES SHARE THE REVENUE. SEEMS FAIR TO ME

By Terry Sagedy

September 6, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this

Can you spell RIDICULOUS?

By Lyrazel

September 6, 2006 02:09 PM | Link to this

Expect a new stadium to be built. This is Atlanta! Waste and pandering is our mantra.

By Matthew

September 6, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

DO NOT BUILD IT IN THE GHETTO. DO NOT BUILD IT IN THE GHETTO. Take it to the ‘burbs! More people will go if it’s in the suburbs, just like more would go to Turner Field if it wasn’t surrounded by trash. I can hear it now…the Alpharetta Falcons

By Ryan

September 6, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

I have no objection to a new stadium if Sir Blank is going to pay for it. I’d even be OK with the state kicking in a little. My main gripe is the comments I’ve been reading. The name of the team is the Atlanta Falcons. Not the North Fulton Falcons, not the Alpharetta Falcons. The stadium belongs Downtown. That is one of the advantafes of living in the city…the cultural and recreational opportunities. If you want the stadium built in the burbs, you must agree to take all the homeless people and higher taxes that go along with city life. If you agree to those two conditions, we can talk.

By Phil

September 6, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

Hey Just Me, Why would UGA want to Lease the Dome? When UGA sells out there is over 92,000 fans there,the Dome only seats 70,000 fans.

By Titothebear

September 6, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

Is Jim Mora writing under the moniker Dookie Boy? Did any of you even read the article? Mr. Blank, in the article, states he would like to build a new stadium where the Georgia Dome is now. That means that facility, paid for by taxpayers, would be torn down at the behest of one man. Look for it to happen! Also, you can expect that taxpayers will have to foot the bill for a new stadium for Mr. Blank. Taxpayers will get the bills and Blank gets an invigorated stream of revenue. He says he wants his own stadium but I doubt he wants to pay for it. The coercion will start soon. Los Angeles will be mentioned, along with other cities, as an alternative if the city of Atlanta balks at handing over the keys to the treasury. It was this same tactic Rankin Smith used to extort the building of the Dome itself. Mr. Smith used the city of Jacksonville, before the Jags came into being, as leverage against the city of Atlanta. The AJC ran articles about his flirtation with Jacksonville, accompanied by photos of him walking around their stadium. The talks, with Jacksonville, were characterized as serious by Mr. Smith, and others, and that was enough for the Atlanta city officials, who then colluded with Mr. Smith, to encumber the citizens of Atlanta and Fulton County with the hideous pimple known as the Georgia Dome. Blank has floated this idea of a new stadium for over a year now. So far, it has been represented in a casual manner but it’s going to become more strident and the more demanding. Within a year, or so, the ultimatum will be forthcoming. It will appear in the paper and on television. The city’s fathers and mothers will be alarmed and then they’ll be stampeded and the citizens will be———-paying for a new facility that isn’t really needed, except by a guy who wants to increase his team’s worth. A new stadium will help when he sells the team. He’ll get the money and the citizens will get the bills. The new owner will take over and a couple years down the line he’ll start talking about replacing that outdated, fifteen year old stadium.

By chris

September 6, 2006 02:12 PM | Link to this

People are not thinking smart here. If you owned the falcons and you were not making as much money as 95% of the teams in the league, would you not want a new stadium?

If Mr. Blank gets a great stadium deal from lets say “Alabama” and decide to move the Falcons how would you feel not to have a PRO football team in the city??

Without Mr. Blank the Falcons were the worst team every year and he has brought the team some respect. Now you want to reward him by saying “NO”?

By Kevin Jones

September 6, 2006 02:12 PM | Link to this

Here is the deal. The lease is a bad lease to todays stadium leases. The stadium could use some upgrades yes. But the new lease is what he wants. He is really not making that much money on the team through the gates, etc..

Now if we can get some upgrades like a retractable roof would be awesome! I have season tickets and some games in October are just a pity to be played inside while it is so nice outside. We could then have the best of both worlds.

One more thing…If they were thinking of building shops there like Green Bay that is a bad idea and those shops would go out of business. There is no parking and Downtown is really not that much to do for shops to be open like that. That is just the facts.

But the main thing I want is the Falcons to be winners!

By Paul

September 6, 2006 02:17 PM | Link to this

The only reason Arthur Blank needs a new stadium is because his over-inflated ego won’t fit inside the Georgia Dome. If he wants a new stadium, tell him to build it with his own money, or move his mediocre franchise somewhere else!

By jat

September 6, 2006 02:19 PM | Link to this

Yes build it in Bremen so I will not have so far to travel when I go to the SEC championship every year!

By Jack

September 6, 2006 02:22 PM | Link to this

Yea. That would be great. Build the new stadium in Gwinnett County. The traffic there is so much better than downtown. And lets not mention all of those terrible areas downtown that evberyone has been talking about like around Turner Field and The Dome. I guess those taco infested places in Gwinnett would be so much better!!!

By Mike T.

September 6, 2006 02:25 PM | Link to this

“”In an interview with the AJC’s Mark Bradley in July, Blank said he hoped to build his own stadium.”“ If he builds his own stadium,with his own money why should anyone object.Its funny some people hear new stadium and they shoot it down no matter what.

By Seriously

September 6, 2006 02:27 PM | Link to this

Let Vick pitch in, he can afford it.

Why should taxpayers have to pay for the facility? Who pays for the Wal-Mart Supercenters? The billion-aire owners.

By Lance

September 6, 2006 02:29 PM | Link to this

I say - if you want a new stadium then poney up your dollars and build one. If you are still interested build in in rural Alpharetta or Cumming and get it out of that corrupt toilet bowl City of Atlanta.

By Lance

September 6, 2006 02:29 PM | Link to this

I say - if you want a new stadium then poney up your dollars and build one. If you are still interested build it in rural Alpharetta or Cumming and get it out of that corrupt toilet bowl City of Atlanta.

By TDF

September 6, 2006 02:33 PM | Link to this

Mr. Blank should be free to build and pay for a stadium wherever he would like and can get approved.

Replacing the Georgia Dome would be a foolish waste.

By DD

September 6, 2006 02:34 PM | Link to this

Arthur…you’ll be in your 70’s by 2016. WTF do you care about a new stadium…you’ll be lucky to be alive.

By Andy

September 6, 2006 02:34 PM | Link to this

What! The current one is just a bit over 10 years old! The Falcons make millions, he [Arthur Blank] can pay for his own one. Somewhere outside of Atlanta.

By Chris Person

September 6, 2006 02:35 PM | Link to this

HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By Jon

September 6, 2006 02:37 PM | Link to this

OF COURSE we need a new stadium, apart from the fact that it needs to be in Gwinnett (which won’t happen b/c Arthur loves downtown), the revenue from the Dome going back to the State instead of into the Falcons’ pockets is killing the team. That’s why Arthur wants to own his own stadium, they can make more money, and therefore spend more on coaches, equipment, technology, etc.

Right now Arthur is having to pay for that stuff out of his pocket b/c the team isn’t making enough money b/c the Dome is taking most of the cash.

By J

September 6, 2006 02:42 PM | Link to this

Let’s build a new stadium, this time with some stuff around it. A stadium should be a draw during the whole business week as well as on the weekends. A new stadium can serve as a convention center, business park, entertainment complex, arts center too. It needs more room for tailgating, and easier access. Put in a double row of luxury boxes and roomier seating.

Put it near Cumberland Mall / Galleria complex.

By slickshea

September 6, 2006 02:44 PM | Link to this

Come on people. 2016 the Dome will be 24 years old. I don’t think thats unreasonable. Plus, I think Blank probably wants to pay for it so it will be his to do with as he pleases. The Falcons are next to last in revenue. If you owned them, wouldn’t you want a new building?

By Chris

September 6, 2006 02:46 PM | Link to this

Why, oh why, are we talking about another stadium. I will tell you why. The dome was rushed into when everybody thought that this was the future of football, indoors where the weather would not hurt ticket sales. So the State of Georgia built a horrible eyesore in downtown without any parking. I would love to see a new stadium like the one that was built for the cardnials in Arizona, too bad were stuck with the plain ole vanilla GA Dome

By fart

September 6, 2006 02:47 PM | Link to this

We attended the last pre season game against Jacksonville. We got on Marta, got to our seats with ease, enjoyed the game (the sound system was turned up a little too loud for pre season game). There is not a bad seat in the Dome. It’s a great place to watch a game. Mr. Blank, please, don’t go tearing down something for nothing. This from a life-long - we’re talking Fulton County stadium - fan.

By Pamela

September 6, 2006 02:48 PM | Link to this

No, the fans will only come if they win, if they don’t all that money and empty seats. Look at how the fans have deserted the Braves

By Marcus

September 6, 2006 02:50 PM | Link to this

Yeah Lance, Cumming has never had any problems. Just Harmony and Love overflowing. Not!

If Blank wants to foot the bill to level the GA Dome and build a new stadium, more power to him. If he wants to move to Cumming, I will just have to go out and buy a Rebel flag for my car. So me and Lance can hang out.

By A.Horne

September 6, 2006 02:54 PM | Link to this

I thought that Fulton Co. Stadium was fine, why did we get rid of that? Hell, it was a place where football was made to be played “Outside”!!!!!!!!!

By Jay

September 6, 2006 02:56 PM | Link to this

Most of you people are obviously not sports fans. Or Falcons fans for that matter. I have read posts claiming that the Falcons have not sold out their existing dome. Incorrect. Hardest ticket in the NFL to get , do your f’ing homework. A new stadium would be amazing. Esp if it is like the new Arizona Stadium , which I’m sure anyone who has written in has no idea about. I mean have any of you looked @ the Dome? it is hideous. The NFL is not predicated solely on winning , there is revenue sharing that enables all teams to make boat loads of money. The NFL is more powerful than all other sports combined ( including NCAA) so bite on that.

By godogssicem

September 6, 2006 02:56 PM | Link to this

NOOOOOOOOOOOO…has he lost his mind??? What is wrong with the Dome? Insanity

By what

September 6, 2006 02:57 PM | Link to this

why do we need a new one i love the georgia dome. is it going to be a dome or outside stadium?

By Ronny

September 6, 2006 03:02 PM | Link to this

Blank said he wants the new stadium downtown. Where the Dome is now. Would hope they wouldn’t tear down the Dome— unless the new stadium would also be a dome. The Georgia Dome has some problems, but such a structure is really great in this type of climate. A sliding roof maybe?

.

By Katie

September 6, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this

No, the city doesn’t need it but if it is built put it in Alpharetta.

By Ripdog

September 6, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this

I don’t think we need a new stadium but that may be the only way the Falcons organization can get a better revenue sharing deal. What’ good for business isn’t always good for the city.

By George

September 6, 2006 03:10 PM | Link to this

Tell Arthur Blank to P*SS up a rope, unless he is paying for the new stadium himself.

By flavoice

September 6, 2006 03:15 PM | Link to this

Outdoor stadium would probably create a more loyal fan base, more interest, more tailgating, etc. being we are in the middle of SEC land. Games here in Sept-November will be fantastic.

However outdoor stadium has limited uses in the offseason. No chance of landing the Superbowl or SEC title game with an outdoor stadium. Perhaps a retractable roof dome is a possibility.

By falcon guy

September 6, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this

Okay this is exactly why state and/or local municipalities should never be in the business of building/financing with taxpayer monies, stadiums and sporting arenas. Because at some point the facilities become undesirable (whether warranted or not) to the teams who play within. Teams should build their own stadiums. It’s like making your teenage son get a job and make him help finance his own car and car related expenses. If you give it to them, they don’t fully appreciate it. I don’t necessarily blame Arthur Blank for wanting a new stadium with a more appealing deal. If you bought a house with an existing HVAC that was not efficient, you’d want to upgrade the system eventually so you can keep more of your money. But if he wants it, he needs to finance it 100% on his own with non-taxpayer involvement.

By Ben

September 6, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this

Ridiculous.

We don’t need a new stadium. I love the Dome and I love having the SEC championship there AND basketball.

We have one of the worst public transit systems in the US and they’re talking about spending hundreds of millions on replacing a stadium that isn’t even 15 years old yet?

Laughable.

By wsj

September 6, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this

If he wants to build a new statdium he needs to a)fulfill his financial commitment to the city and b)pay for the new one without one single dime of taxpayer money. I’m sick and tired of being told how much money these teams bring in. If someone did some truthful accounting, we’d probably find out it’s less that the financial burden of handing out tax breaks. If the Falcons don’t like those terms, they are more than welcome to fly the Atlanta coop.

By chris

September 6, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this

People keep saying put the stadium in Alpharetta, but they know if a stadium is built in the nice part of town the residence of those nice subdivision would not want it because of the “people” that would be coming to thier part of town.

By Al

September 6, 2006 03:18 PM | Link to this

Okay let’s look at this logically: 1. By 2016, the dome will be 24 years old, and by that time outdated as far as facilities go. You guys act if he wants to build it today. Come on!!! My how quickly people will turn on the guy. Did he turn on us when he purchased the team. No! He lowered prices so we could afford tickets. 2. The Falcons are selling out every home game now, it may not look like it because we still have fair weather fans who don’t show even with a paid ticket. To stay competitive, you have to have money to get the players. Rather you guys want to believe that or not. In order to do that he has to have revenue coming in. How do owners get their revenue; ticket sales. Who is benefiting from Falcons ticket sales at the moment, The Dome/State.

You guys are amazing, you want a winning franchise, you want your owner to be fair to fans, but as soon as new stadium is mentioned you want no part. You automatically assume it is coming 100% out of the taxpayers pockets.

If you guys are gonna whine and complain at least offer a suggestion.

If he can’t get a new stadium, at least compromise on renovating the dome to have a retractable roof or updated features/equipment in 2016.

Suggestin a new stadium is certianly not unfair or unreasonable in order to stay competitive.

By Tom

September 6, 2006 03:19 PM | Link to this

YES! AND BLOW UP THE DOME!

By Jim Miles

September 6, 2006 03:20 PM | Link to this

Blank no.

By hair

September 6, 2006 03:21 PM | Link to this

NO! I don’t think there needs to be a new stadium built. Just renegotiate the current deal.

By Michael

September 6, 2006 03:23 PM | Link to this

By 2016 they had better be playing soccer there if any weight can be attached to these immigration numbers.

By ME

September 6, 2006 03:28 PM | Link to this

By Slinky

September 6, 2006 03:30 PM | Link to this

Jay,

DO YOUR HOMEWORK!!!

Falcons tickets are far, far, far from the hardest ticket in the NFL to get. The waiting list for Green Bay, Chicago, and others are older than the Falcons franchise.

The dome is crap, all domes are..

By kellix

September 6, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

Yes we need a new one, or if the Georgia Dome could sell to Mr. Blank. There have been 23 new stadiums built since the Ga dome. We could get back to the way football was meant to be outdoors, get a retractable roof on it for rainy days. Have real grass, and no more turf toe injuries, and the, No Dome team has ever won the super bowl. Yes the taxpayers would have to foot the bill some. I just think it would be better if they sold the Dome to Arthur Blank and let him decide what to do with it.

By mike p

September 6, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

Get the Dome out of the GHETTO!!! I fear for my life when I go to Falcons games. The tailgating is terrible due to parking. Get the stadium out of downtown, somewhere where we can have PLENTY of parking to tailgate and be safe. How about closer to the complex in FB. Maybe the Buford area? Or Sugarloaf?

By Buck

September 6, 2006 03:34 PM | Link to this

Build it in some abandoned strip mall in the deteriorating burbs. It shouldn’t be hard to find such a spot.

By Michael

September 6, 2006 03:35 PM | Link to this

Onion,

In 2016 the Dome will be 20 years old and in need of replacement. The guy is smart to think about the future of his franchise. At least he’s not holding it over the city’s head at the last minute.

By Akagi

September 6, 2006 03:36 PM | Link to this

I don’t go to the Falcon games as it is, so why should I care?

By randy

September 6, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this

What Atlanta needs, more than a new stadium, is a football team! Let Blank take the Falcons and run if that is what he wants to do but if he can’t win the Super Bowl then who really cares. The Falcons haven’t been a real football team in way too many years and to think they deserve a new venue is unbelievable! Team first then stadium!

By JB

September 6, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this

THE IDEA IS NICE. BUT LETS WIN OUR 1ST SUPER BOWL BEFORE WE DO THAT!!!! IF WE DON’T MAKE SOME NOISE THIS YEAR WITH ALL OUR TALENT ITS THE COACHES FAULT PERIOD….AT SOME POINT YOU HAVE TO COACH.

By Fran

September 6, 2006 03:42 PM | Link to this

He’d better not expect the taxpayers to foot the bill.

By t

September 6, 2006 03:44 PM | Link to this

you folk from the northside of town need to get a grip. It won’t matter if the dome is built north or south of Atlanta crime happens everywhere. You can’t get away from it

By M.J. Elliott

September 6, 2006 03:45 PM | Link to this

Football SHOULD ALWAYS be played oudoors. A new stadium would be great!!! However, I don’t want to pay a single dime of it with MY taxes. Let him pay for it and I’ll support it with ticket puchases … ONLY!

By Fulton

September 6, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this

You people talk about intown traffic but the only traffic intown is the folks heading out to the suburbs! Also, since those ‘north of the city’ didn’t want MARTA in their neighborhood (to keep out a certain element), how do you think the transportation situation will work out? Mr. Arthur, I say build it. Put it wherever you want and then take your team with you.

By Jason

September 6, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this

mike p, don’t make the taxpayers of Georgia pay for the fact that you’re a wimp. All the girls are laughing at you and your fears. Even my grandmother is able to go to the games and not pee her pants in fear like you. Are you proud of being such a girlyman? Who needs such a pansy as a fan?

If a new stadium is built, how about something that isn’t out of date in twenty years?

By jpop379

September 6, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

You are probably going to see a re-design of the existing stadium area with the team playing games at Bobby Dodd Stadium or in Athens while it is being constructed. Similar to what the Chicago Bears did during the re-design of Soldier Field.

I assume a new roof won’t be a $$$ cost (Architect) as Mr. Blank has wanted an open-air stadium + additional tail-gate areas for fans to congregate before games.

10 years is a long time from now. With a few 4-12 seasons Mr. B may get disgusted & sell the team by then anyway…

By Jason

September 6, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this

Yes, i’d vote for a new stadium in 2016. Its 10 years away people!!! by that time, the current stadium will not be good enough for an NFL franchise…think about it!!!!

By DirtySanchez

September 6, 2006 03:58 PM | Link to this

The dome SUX and is more for conventions than football. The Falcons need an outdoor stadium and Onion, WTF are you talking about (‘and selling out every football game this would be a much different story.’)?There is now a 10 year plus waiting list for season tickets and they have sold out every game since Blank bought the team so your argument makes no sense. Keep the dome where it is for SEC championships/special event/conventions/etc which is what it was designed for anyway and build a new open air stadium north of Atlanta! Blank has one of the worst deals for an owner in the NFL and given what he was done for the fans, he deserves it. Does no one remember what the Falcons were like before???

By DwayneL.

September 6, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

Great idea and vision on part of Blank! I might be more inclined to attend a Falcons game if it were outdoors. The experience just isn’t the same in a dome. That’s why I attend colege football games.

By SICEM

September 6, 2006 04:02 PM | Link to this

First of all Dookie boy is an ignorant idiot and should get off this blog. Now to the item of conversation. In 2016 the dome will be 18 years old and probably a lot more weathered than we presently think of it. The dome is also in a horrible spot with very few areas for tailgating which has become almost as much a part of attending football games as the game itself. No parking and rides on MARTA are not on the wish list of the majority of fans who attend the Falcons games. The lease deal that the team is locked into is great for the city but hurts the team tremendously in lost revenue which could be used to invest in the free agent market every year to insure a quality product hits the field on game day and lets face it folks winning is what this is all about! Therefore I cant say I blame Mr. Blank for his desire for a new venue as in the long run it will be better for the team, the fans and the city, a winner keeps the seats, hotels and eating establishments filled as well as other entertainment venues. Mr Blank is a great business man who looks to the future with an eye toward profits which buy players. Remember when the Smiths owned the team and a good players contract was coming to an end and we knew he would not be in a Falcon uniform anymore due the team was in financial difficulty all the time and the Smiths were cheap and didnt care about the team? Have you noticed that free agents are being re signed now? Wonderful isnt it? I think we will see a new facility in the next ten years and it will be monetarily a good thing for everyone including the taxpayers because a smart business man is behind it. GO FALCONS!

By big tone

September 6, 2006 04:03 PM | Link to this

if the falcons win the superbowl im all for the new stadium,then!

By TY

September 6, 2006 04:04 PM | Link to this

Hey how about the puting it at Ft Gillem when it closes. Put the Falcons training center there too. Southside of town easy access to I-75,285/675. Besides what else are they going to the place when it closes.

By Brett

September 6, 2006 04:07 PM | Link to this

How about the Falcons play at a consistent level before considering another place to play!?! Better yet…why don’t we keep the Dome for college, high school and other special events and get rid of the Falcons! Seriously, what do all you fairweather fans care anyway??? Come October 22 you’ll all get to see what a real team with a real fan base is like!!! Go Steelers!!!

By nofalconfan

September 6, 2006 04:07 PM | Link to this

HELL NO

By cw

September 6, 2006 04:14 PM | Link to this

Studies have shown that a stadium contributes marginally to an economy. If he wants to pay for it all, then that is his choice. If he wants the public to pay and wants a deal on taxes, etc., then I would be opposed.

By sct

September 6, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this

Isn’t it ironic that “Mr Cut My Taxes Republican Blank” is going to want public tax dollars to pay for his new Taj Majal?

How about a 100 dollar surcharge for each ticket. Would you welfare loving sports fans agree to that?….Then why should Georgia taxpayers?

No one has answered why the public should build this. Wal-Mart creates jobs and adds to the economy AND builds its own facilities, like a billionaire should.

These new facilities are built for the corporate elite, not the average fan. The Dome is a great place to watch a game.

Gov Perdue and Mark Taylor better be ready to answer this…Do you support spending 700 million dollars on a stadium used 10 time a year, for a billionaire owner.

By Michelle

September 6, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this

First we need a consistantly winning football team. Second, we definitely need a “new” and improved stadium. The Dome looks like an old 70’s icon that has seen better days.

By roli

September 6, 2006 04:19 PM | Link to this

All you people make me sick! Atlanta doesn’t deserve a Super Bowl or a professional sports team for that matter. We have the WORSE fans in all of sports. The Braves won 14 straight divison titles and none of the playoff games were even sold out, and now that we are struggling a bit 5 games out of the wild-card we still won’t support them. The falcons made great moves during the off-season and you still are not happy. No optomism, no team spirit, it said and i am dissapointed to call myself a Atlanta sports fan. F##K all of yall, and when Vick wins MVP and is holding up the Lombardi Trophey at the of the season, please dont call yourself a true falcon fan. Who cares about a new stadium we need new fans.

By Jason

September 6, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Let’s see… twenty years of useful life times ten games a year divided into 700 million dollars comes out to 3.5 million dollars per game for the stadium. Wow, what a great deal!

By Brian

September 6, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Atlanta needs a new stadium when Green Bay builds a new one. The fans of Green Bay own the franchise and they are not about to waste money on a new stadium. Follow their lead and keep what we have.

By Kevin

September 6, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this

NO

By WallStBro

September 6, 2006 04:26 PM | Link to this

I’m all for the Falcons getting a new stadium especially if the stadium is built with revenue bonds, much like the current arrangement, which relieves the taxpayers of much of the burden. Let’s face it, in 2016, the dome will be 24 years old, and while not necessarily outdated now, it will be in ten years. As far as the stadium being outdoors, that’s totally ludicrous. While outdoor stadiums cost less to build, the upkeep on such a stadium can run 50-100% more than a dome, due to the wear of the elements on seats, the field and the like. In addition, Atlanta barely qualifies as a Super Bowl eligible city with an average winter temp of 62 degrees, just above the 59 degree minimum to qualify as an open stadium. This would further hamper any chances of having another Super Bowl, which we know, can virtually pay for the stadium in additional hotel, car rental, Super Bowl tax revenue. In short, it’s not a bad idea if done properly and with NO PSL(personal seat licenses)!!!!

By Gayla

September 6, 2006 04:27 PM | Link to this

I am so sick and tired of owners and players complaining about everything. They are the most priviliged people in the world to get to play a game for a living and/or make money from people playing a game for a living. I the Falcons would put their time and effort into helping to bring business into this city and be something to be proud of, that MIGHT be a different story.

By sct

September 6, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this

3.5 million per game works out to $50.00 per ticket surcharge. (70,000 capacity)

Great deal, and no welfare!

By THE EDGE

September 6, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

It’s a great idea for the Falcons to get a new stadium. Football is meant to be played out doors not indoors. If you build it, they will come.

By businessman

September 6, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this

I have no problem with Mr. Blank building a new stadium. He owns the Falcons. I had no problem with him building Home Depot buildings. He owned the company. When you’re “the man” you can do what you want.

I DO have a problem with him asking for the State of Georgia to build HIM a stadium for HIM to make a profit.

If he wants to move the team to some other state that is dumb enough to build him a stadium, let him. This is a major market area. Someone will move here to replace him.

Don’t let him BS you. He did that to the public with Home Depot by telling everyone that he was selling merchandise at rock bottom prices. He made a mint out of selling at those low low prices. He’s a businessman. If someone will give him something for him to sell (a building), he’ll do it and make even more money.

By Robert

September 6, 2006 04:32 PM | Link to this

Why not just cut the roof off of this one?

By SICEM

September 6, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

Roli, With language and retoric like that we are dissapointed you call youself an Atlanta sports fan also! Now go back to your gangsta rap cds and leave the decent folks alone!

By jared orlando

September 6, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

I am a loyal season ticket holder for the falcons for the last 5 years. Why would a stadium which has had updates done to it over the years and been taken care of as well as the Dome has. Why replace it due to an owner that wants to up his revenue. Arthur if you want it build it yourself!! No thank you I don’t want property taxes or any other public funds going toward this stadium. If you move the Falcons out of Atlanta then see you later. Direct TV is just as good for me if you move the team over this issue.

By happy2bnappy

September 6, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

“Sssshhhhh!!!! Arthur!! Don’t talk too loud, the Spirit Boys will hear you and the HAWKS will want a new stadium.”

By Arthur Bank Isanidiot

September 6, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this

We don’t need a new stadium. If Blank wants one make him pay for it. He pays too much for an idiot quarterback and wants us the taxpayers to replace a perfectly good fairly new stadium. He’s full of it. He can move the Falcons to another city and let us get a franchise that wins. When the Falcons win a few Super Bowls (they haven’t won one yet) then let him ask for a new stadium.

By Henry

September 6, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this

NOT JUST NO….BUT, HELL NO!!!!!!

By Joao

September 6, 2006 04:43 PM | Link to this

If it has a retractroof and real grass, I’m all for it.

By Jason

September 6, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this

Georgia Dome outdated after twenty years? Gee, I guess that means Sanford Stadium is way overdue for being torn down! Don’t worry UGA fans, you can watch the dogs play at Athens High School while the stadium is being rebuilt.

By Waste Not, Want Not

September 6, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this

What do we need a new stadium for? The one we have is almost-new. Is there nothing else they can spend that amount of money on? How about improving downtown Atlanta so that people feel safe going to the games?

By A. Blank

September 6, 2006 04:45 PM | Link to this

You guys don’t understand finances at all. I don’t really care if 60,000 or 80,000 fans show up. We’re dead last in making money, and i got screwed over with my contract with the georgia dome. I make my money by building pressboxes and suites and selling them out to wealthy companies around Alpharetta, Lawrencville, etc. What high exec with money would ever come down to the georgia dome where there’s no parking and the residences down there are less than pleasing? I don’t need the downtown fan base, there’s a bigger, more wealthier fan base outside the perimeter. Don’t even think my football players cares who shows up as long as they get paid. peace.

By buff

September 6, 2006 04:46 PM | Link to this

Football is supposed to be played outdoors, it’s that simple. As long as I don’t have to pay more for my season tickets then I say move on. Or actually move outside. How about an outdoor stadiuim that the backdrop is the downtown Atlanta skyline. That idea has a ring to it…

By hazer

September 6, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this

Have y’all even bothered reading the article about this? Blank states he wants to keep the stadium downtown, and doesn’t have a problem using his own money to build it. Even mentioned that he’d like it to be built on the same spot! Picture a bright, sunny, cool November Sunday afternoon, a retractable roof, REAL grass on the field, with a close-up view of the downtown/midtown skyline. Who’s crazy enough NOT to want a new and improved open-air stadium in the same spot as the old one, TEN years down the road from now, built with the owners own millions. Wake up…..

By Bart

September 6, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

I like how the AJC poses the question, “Does Atlanta need this?” Candidly, it’s not for the City of Atlanta to decide or even opine, for that matter. This is a for-profit venture. Mr. Blank has never mentioned city involvement. It’s like asking if we need another Starbucks. Probably not, but it’s up to the corporation to make a decison about whether or not they’ll make money.

By Tad

September 6, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this

Just remove the roof from the dome.

By Kelley

September 6, 2006 04:53 PM | Link to this

This is crazy! If he gets this done he will be wasting lots of mu lah!

By Jimmy Johnson

September 6, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this

He knew what he was buying into. If he doesn’t like it let him pay for the next. Other than being a dome, the only wrong with it is that awful color scheme.

By Bob

September 6, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this

If Mr. Blank wants a new stadium so be it… as long as he lives up to his contract first and the taxpayers don’t have to pay for the new one… lots of luck on that count. I’m a Falcon fan, but I don’t see alot of that kind of support for most other businesses… maybe a tax break or two, within reason, but not the kind of financial windfall that has been done in the past.

By McDonoughDawg

September 6, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this

Indoor football stinks. Build it, and I will consider buying tickets…It needs to be downtown for sure…

By JWN

September 6, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this

HE’S JUST BEING A GREEDY OWNER. MONEY IS MONEY…HE JUST WANTS MORE MONEY TO HIMSELF… SINCE HE WANTS A NEW STADIUM THEN LET HIM AND HIGH PAYING PLAYERS PAY THE BILL FOR IT. WHY SHOULD WE PAY FOR IT? THERE ARE OTHER THINGS WE NEED TO FOCUS ON LIKE IMPROVING THE TRAFFIC AROUND ATLANTA.

By Seriously

September 6, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

Where does he say he intends to use his own money in that article?????

From the article….. “He did not elaborate Wednesday on what kind of new deal he wants, where he thinks a new stadium might be located or how it would be financed.”

By Economics

September 6, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this

Listen, I know people think we don’t need a new stadium but we do. A stadium not only is a place for football and other events, but it represents the team and the city. And when FOX televises Falcons games and they show how old the Dome is, it reflects on all of us. Building a new stadium would help all of us because other events like Super Bowls, Bowl games, and concerts and what not would want to come to the new stadium. Look at what has happened with the new Gwinnett Arena. Plus, by building a new stadium it gives Atlantan’s jobs. Arthur Blank’s history with the Falcons is a very positive one. He has gone out and spend money and turned the Falcons around. We might not have had back to back winning seasons but we didn’t lose back to back seasons either, a trait of the previous owners as nice as they were. I’m for building a new stadium.

By Rob

September 6, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this

I dont want any of my tax dollars wasted like this! The current ones still new FFS Rob

By Darold

September 6, 2006 05:06 PM | Link to this

Can you win a SuperBowl first. No lets try back to back winning years. It only been 40yrs,do you need 40 more.

By Steve

September 6, 2006 05:07 PM | Link to this

YES! Which one of your fairies decided to paint it pink and green anyway? Let’s go with a better paint scheme this time…

By Dennis

September 6, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

If Mr. Blank wants it and builds it with his money he can put it anywhere the zoning will allow it.

By WarEagle

September 6, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this

HELL NO!! As much as I respect and admire Arthur Blank, this is completely, T-Totally ASININE!!!

By JJ Johnson

September 6, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this

Suckling the Government Breast at tax payers expense has become very popular for anyone connected in any way to the city of Atlanta. No wonder Fulton County tax payers are in revolt and desire disconnecting from anything involving Atlanta or Fulton County.Nothing but a SHAM to steal more tax money and funnel it to minority contractors. The Georgia Dome is fine.

By Doug

September 6, 2006 05:26 PM | Link to this

NO WAY! I think our play pen is just fine. Let’s talk about it when it is 30 years old.

I wasn’t a fan of bulldozing the Fulton County Stadium as football should be played on grass outside. But the dome did help us get the Olympics and the Superbowl. So now that we have the dome, let’s at least use it, so we can all value out of it that we paid to get it.

By Kevin

September 6, 2006 05:26 PM | Link to this

I think there is a need for an outdoor professional football stadium. Besides Mr. Blank paid alot of money for a poorly run football organization. He has givin the Falcons there wings. Now all he needs is a better nest..Ha,ha,ha..

By GaLiberal

September 6, 2006 05:27 PM | Link to this

Just another example of the very rich wanting yet another handout. Studies have shown that building sports complexes are the worst investment a city can make. The team owners want so many concessions like no property taxes, free rent and utilities, even a cut of the sales tax the taxpayers windup footing the bill. As for jobs, they generate only seasonal low-paying minimum wage jobs with no healthcare or retirement benefits. The only benefit is that politicans can crow about the wonderful sports team for the city/county/state and all the jobs they created by screwing the taxpayers.

By That Finklestein Kid

September 6, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

I worked at Heery, Intl when they were builing the Dome. I saw the model and thought that the colors were awful then and they are awful now. Some high up guys wife must have thought it was great back then just like her big 1990’s hairdo. I also hate indoor football but I have also been in the Dome on some days that were mid 30’s and raining. All the “true” fans that would go see the Falcons in one of the “off years” in that mess raise your hands. I remember seeing the Falcons in the rain at Atlanta Fulton County Stadium and it was bad weather and worse football. The Dome was the best thing that happened to the Falcons. That way they could lose to the 0 and 13 Jets at home and be booed without getting their hair wet.

By Matthew

September 6, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

I’d pony up 100% of my tax money for this stadium before I’d want one penny going towards medicare, medicaid, or welfare…Let ME enjoy MY tax money, not someone else!! BUILD IT!!

By sofia

September 6, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

Will the 200 level seat holders be able to go down and buy some food if he builds it? If so, then I will be happy. So will Howard.

By Dejay

September 6, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this

Okay, I’ve read enough. The only problem I have with the whole thing is how the ‘Don’ intends on financing it. Will he utilize a PSL plan like Nashville and others have recently or will the taxpayers end up footing the bill? That’s the ONLY problem I have with a new stadium. Other than that, I say go for it.

I hear a lot of folks complaining about the Dome only being 14 years old. Well, how do you think the place will look ten years from now? Many of you don’t remember how old and decrepit the Omni used to look in the late 80’s-early 90’s when the city owned it and it was a little over two decades old when Ted Turner wanted a new arena back then.

Why do you think he is trying to do everything he can now to try to get this team in a Super Bowl? Because if the team gets there and (gasp) wins, it will be much easier sell to get a new building financed, unlike Rankin Smith who had to all but threaten to leave for Jacksonville when he tried to get a deal done when his team was the laughingstock of the league.

Keep in mind that the only reason the Georgia Dome was built in the first place was to attract other major events that would normally go elsewhere (Super Bowls, Final Fours, SEC title games, the Olympics) because either the weather was too unpredictable for AFCS to handle or the alternative (the Omni back then) was wayyy too small and run down. Striking a deal to include Smith’s Falcons was a bonus.

The fact that the Falcons are next to last in revenue and value should send chills to everyone at the State Capitol who owns the Georgia Dome because it echoed everything that Blank has stated since the day his check cleared Taylor Smith’s bank account. Despite last year’s collapse, the team is 35-32-1 since Blank took over, which is lightyears beyond what it was with the Smiths. You want this team to continue attracting/keeping free agents? You want this team to remain competitive and not cry poor every year like Ralph Wilson does with the Bills? If so, this needs to be done. You can’t expect him to continue shelling out tens of millions in signing bonuses every year while receiving pennies back because of a bad stadium lease that was signed back in Reagan’s second term. Is it fair to schools and the homeless? Of course not but lets be real honest with ourselves here. There are schools who can’t get a half-full auditorium for a PTA meeting unless there is something controversial going down but are razor-quick to get to the Dome to see events there. It is what it is.

By NiKKO

September 6, 2006 05:42 PM | Link to this

NO! Why? Falcons need to win a superbowl. Just like the Hawks have this fabulous arena and they don’t win jack squat. Atlanta wants WINNERS, not a new building.

By Russell Mondy

September 6, 2006 05:48 PM | Link to this

All of this for 10 days of usage a year.

By Dirrtybird

September 6, 2006 06:08 PM | Link to this

Do you think that the Dome is only used 10 times a year? I mean really. Ever hear of conventions? March Madness? Olympics? College Bowl Games? Most of you people can’t even comprehend actual business and economy so of course you can’t understand the economic stimulation that a new dome would have. Super Bowls, Bowl Games just to name a few. There are so many ways to make money off of a new Dome. Making Money requires investment. Arthur Blank understands that. You people don’t. It’s 10 years away. Settle down.

By james

September 6, 2006 06:18 PM | Link to this

This is the oldest play in the business book. Blank is negotiating and laying the seeds through the press for a better $$ deal with the GA Dome. The Dome is a great stadium in an optimal location. In 10 years, yes, it will need some renovation and why not look at a retractable roof and natural grass like AZ just did. The Falcons are valued at $720M, Blank paid $525M. He has done well and has everything he needs to be competitive. Does anyone remember Ted Turner circa 1992 talking about moving to Gwinnett if the Braves didn’t get a new stadium? It’s all negotiations people.

By FloridaBoy

September 6, 2006 06:21 PM | Link to this

Let me make sure I’m getting this right, Blank wants a new stadium for the birds. Why not? The Ga Dome cannot hold the falcons no more, especially since the falcons are the only team that creates a buzz around town. Look at the Arizona Cardinals; have you seen there new stadium? It’s has the dome looking like a high school field. Let the state have the dome. Why now build the new Home Depot Field in Sandy Springs/Buckhead/Marietta. Put it somewhere nice so when the NFL committee comes to see the new stadium, they will have to host the Super bowl their. Hey look at the Miami Dolphins, we have been playing in Pro Player Stadium since Dan Marino was a rookie(1984). Ya’ll know the Dallas Cowboys are going to build a monster of a staduim soon, SO WHY NOT ATLANTA. Phillips Arena is one of the nicest arena’s in the league. To bad Dominque isn’t playing

By Roger Salz

September 6, 2006 06:23 PM | Link to this

Arthur Blank has done more for Atlanta than anyone else has ever dreamed of. If Arthur wants a new stadium; then by golly lets build a new one, a sports palace worthy of a world class city.

By ITP

September 6, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this

Wow. Just heard about the shootings IN the mall in Gwinnett County. North Suburbs… HA!

By ReadMyLipsNoNewTaxes

September 6, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this

his buddie Bernie Marcus built an aquarium just to be nice. Why does Blank deserve a new stadium to make money. If he wants a new stadium, he should look to his friend, and build one, dedicate it to altanta, and be a good corporate citizen, not a drain on tax payers.

By Vee

September 6, 2006 06:28 PM | Link to this

If he’s paying for it okay. If not, what’s wrong with the Dome?

By martin

September 6, 2006 06:31 PM | Link to this

KING ARTHUR only needs a new stadium to impress his fellow BILLIONERS budies. and what’s wrong with the old one. and if the falcons can’t get to the super bowl with VICK their not going to get in for a long time

By Matt

September 6, 2006 06:32 PM | Link to this

Actually, yes. The Georgia Dome is a crappy venue, built at the tale end of the utilitarian era of stadiums. However, Mr Blank should be able to find the money for it without hitting up Joe Q. Taxpayer.

By JH

September 6, 2006 06:38 PM | Link to this

Look, I could care less as long as Mr. Blank gets out is own checkbook. The City of Atlanta should NOT pay. Georgia Dome is not great, but its not bad either…

By Greg

September 6, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Blank wants a new stadium. People in Hell want ice water.

By JJ

September 6, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Does this the new stadium come with a new defense?

By Victorious

September 6, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Most of these comments are missing the boat. This has very little to do with the stadium, and everything to do with the “deal.” If the state of Georgia were to tell Arthur that he could keep all of the revenues from tickets, parking, suites, concessions - even other non-football events held in the facility (as many of the “more valuable” NFL franchises do) - he would play in the Dome until George Bush becomes a Democrat! A new stadium brings with it the opportunity to negotiate a new, more favorable deal - period. Let the state of Georgia offer to renegotiate its contract with the Falcons and watch how adequate the Georgia Dome will suddenly become. All of the talk about the stadium’s shortcomings is just so much “fertilizer” - successful franchises have played in smaller, older, less attractive facilities forever - it’s all about the Benjamins. Looking for the truth from a member of the Billionaire Boys’ Club? Follow the flow of the ca$h…

By Ron

September 6, 2006 07:09 PM | Link to this

YES!!! For the love of God, PLEASE PLEASE not another dome! Atlanta has the most beautiful autumns in the world. I used to go to 5 or 6 games a year when they played outdoors. Since the dome was built, I’ve been to 3 games. I hate it! Let’s get back to real football.

By infamousfalcons

September 6, 2006 07:14 PM | Link to this

I think he should have “his” new stadium as long as “he” pays for it. No tax money. We have other pressing issues in GA.

By Stuart

September 6, 2006 07:20 PM | Link to this

No, a new dome deinately isn’t needed. The one we’ve got is fine. I’d rather spend tax dollars contributing to the Braves’ payroll, so they can get back into contention! I’d also even give some to the Falcons so they can actually get to the Superbowl instead of just being all this “hype”

By Frank

September 6, 2006 07:25 PM | Link to this

Build it in Waycross, plenty of room for parking and fewer muggers

By John D

September 6, 2006 07:31 PM | Link to this

He can put the stadium in Bonny F**k, Egypt, as far as I am concerned as long as he spends his own money. But if the Falcons play outside the Atlanta city limits, they can call themselves the Sandy Springs Falcons, but not Atlanta anything.

By DJ

September 6, 2006 07:44 PM | Link to this

There’s no need for a new stadium for the Falcons right now. I’m a current resident of Kansas City and a soon be resident of Atlanta and I had an oppurtunity to visit the Georgia Dome this preseason and everything seemed up to date and in perfect condition. In comparison to Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City, Arrowhead really looks old and dated and maybe should’ve been the one that should be torn down and rebuilt. However, Arrowhead is nearly 35 years old though but a much needed renovation measure passed earlier this year for a 3/8 cent sales tax for Jackson County, Missouri over the next 25 years otherwise, the Chiefs threatened to build in the state of Kansas. The game experience, however, much different, the Georgia Dome is in much better condition so why let it go to waste now? If Mr. Blank wants this so bad, he should pay for it all and not put the burden on Fulton County, the city of Atlanta and whoever else might vote in Metro Atlanta if were to go on a ballot. If he does get his wish, keep it downtown and not spread out in the suburbs like in cities such as Kansas City or Dallas.

By Nikki

September 6, 2006 07:52 PM | Link to this

You are so right………the point is the deal the Falcons have with the stadium is terrible. Blank is a business man…..and who can blame him for wanting out of a terrible deal. My only request PLEASE build and OUTDOOR stadium.

By Ben

September 6, 2006 07:55 PM | Link to this

I don’t think half of you guys even know the story of what’s going on with the Georgia Dome and the Falcons. Arthur Blank DOES plan on building this stadium with his own money! That’s the whole point. Right now he only gets a small percentage operating income from the Dome owners (the Georgia World Congress Center) and he has to pay 10% of gate receipts in rent. He gets no cut in concession sales like the Kraft family with the Patriots. He’s said repeatedly that he fully intends to stay in downtown and not move it to the far reaching suburbs that don’t have the city infrastructure to support a stadium, such as water supply, sewage, roads and rail access. All of us northside suburbanites know full well hos terrible our city infrastructure is up here, the Falcons would be crazy to move to the land of never ending road construction!

By Bubba Bluffton

September 6, 2006 08:02 PM | Link to this

Not just no but hell, no.
Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium was built for the Braves to play in beginning in 1966. It was built for baseball and granted, it was a terrible football stadium. However, Rankin Smith, Sr. threatened to leave town with the Falcons and head for Jacksonville because the Gator Bowl was going to be rebuilt. He basically blackmailed the City of Atlanta and the Governor into building a new stadium to keep the team in Atlanta. By the way, eleven (11) million dollars was still left for payment on Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium when it was demolished—and we are still paying for it, as a parking lot.
If professional sports teams want new stadia, then let the owners come up with the cash. It is not the responsibility of the taxpayers to fund building new facilities for teams. Remember the Omni? Guess what, folk? It was another jobs program for Atlanta designed for the return of professional hockey to Atlanta. Arthur’s buddy coughed up $200 million for his over-rated aquarium. Let Big Art come up with the cash for a new stadium—down on Metropolitan Parkway.

By Corey

September 6, 2006 08:04 PM | Link to this

” say - if you want a new stadium then poney up your dollars and build one. If you are still interested build it in rural Alpharetta or Cumming and get it out of that corrupt toilet bowl City of Atlanta.”

Please start reading the Atlanta Business Chronicle - Trump Towers is coming to Atlanta and high rise condos, high end condos are popping up all over Midtown and Buckhead. People who do - and will- inhabit these places can certainly afford the price of tickets. You suburabanites with your cookie-cutter Mc Mansions and bland lifestyles aren’t the only people with money. In addition, you certainly have your share of gang bangers, home invaders, car jackers and tracks of formers inner city, project dwellers who have been pushed out due to urban revitalization. Take off the blinders.

By Yahso

September 6, 2006 08:06 PM | Link to this

It’s hard to add to the overwhelming call for Mr. Blank to lower that flag…ain’t nobody saluting. Now, how about this: you took the Force from Gwinnett, why not give the Falcons to Gwinnett? Close to Flowery Branch…c’mopn! No? Too far from the fan base? I guess Arthur more than replaced the Gwinnett Force fans with cheap deals to Falcons fans, so if he builds a new stadium, say, in Sandy Springs, I KNOW he believes they will come.

By Chris

September 6, 2006 08:12 PM | Link to this

Ben, Actually Mr Blank bought a team that was in a contractual agreement with the state of Georgia. He is a business man and him and his lawyers were fully aware of the agreement they were entering. After the Georgia Dome is paid for and the contractual obligations are taken care of in 2020 or earlier then Mr Blank is free to negotiate a new deal or at that time he can build as many stadiums as he would like wherever he would like and pending NFL approval he can have his team play in that or those stadiums.

By Sal

September 6, 2006 08:12 PM | Link to this

Atlanta or Metro Atlanta absolutely needs a new stadium. Bravo to Arthur Blank for all he has done with the Falcons. If cities like Pittsburgh and Philly can have new stadiums, Atlanta should as well—and it doesn’t need to be in downtown—about somewhere north like Forsyth County.

By FalconManiac

September 6, 2006 08:15 PM | Link to this

Arthur Blank wants the taxpayers to pay for a new stadium so he can more money? What a #%@%# joke! If you want a new stadium to get richer, build it yourself with your own %## money Arthur—-the team sucks anyway, so we don’t need a new stadium.

By cityguy

September 6, 2006 08:15 PM | Link to this

Great thing about this is to read all the anti-Atlanta comments. If you don’t like the city, then by all means, stay the f—- out.

By davedawg

September 6, 2006 08:18 PM | Link to this

Yes the Dome needs to be replaced. And Yes it needs to be in downtown Atlanta or at least inside the Perimeter preferebly near a Marta or Beltline stop. And Yes Blank needs to foot a major part of the bill, upwards of 75% of it.

By Chris

September 6, 2006 08:20 PM | Link to this

Sal, Fine then build a stadium we aren’t stopping you. I am not paying for a new one until we pay for the current one. Philadelphia replaced a 31 year old stadium. Pittsburgh replaced a 30 year old stadium. The Georgia Dome is only 16 years old.

By Bob CEE

September 6, 2006 08:21 PM | Link to this

If ARTHUR wants a new stadium have him write a BLANK check

By Chris

September 6, 2006 08:22 PM | Link to this

Stadium histories for all you idiots who think stadiums need to be replaced every decade.

http://www.stadiumsofnfl.com/past.htm

By James Blunt

September 6, 2006 08:24 PM | Link to this

Hell no!!!! Tell Blank after he wins a few super bowls we can talk about it…but until that time he can go screw himself and his s** azz team

By Hash Mark

September 6, 2006 08:24 PM | Link to this

The taxpayers provide a facility for a private company, the Falcons, to use to make millions of dollars. The taxpayers have no say in how the company is run, but are expected to provide whatever the idiot Falcons want. Let’s buy them one way plane tickets to Fargo, ND. Now there’s a group that is in dire need of a football team.

By Chris

September 6, 2006 08:26 PM | Link to this

Shouldn’t we spend our tax money and implode Sanford Stadium. That thing is 70 years old.

By Snakedoctor

September 6, 2006 08:27 PM | Link to this

I can understand why Arthur Blank wants a new facility outside the authority of Atlanta City government and the state government control. Build a new outside design for football only with a retractible roof. I am sure Cobb and Gwinett counties would be happy to have a new facility for the Georgia Falcons.

By Gator Fan

September 6, 2006 08:30 PM | Link to this

YES WE NEED A NEW STADIUM….THERE IS NO REASON TO PLAY FOOTBALL INDOORS IN ATLANTA. FOOTBALL IS BETTER OUTSIDE. WATCHING A GAME AT THE DOME IS LIKE WATCHING IT IN YOUR LIVING ROOM….IT’S COLD HERE LIKE WHAT…1 WEEK A YEAR NOW? STOP YOUR WHINING AND COMMIT YOURSELF TO THIS TEAM.

By James Blunt

September 6, 2006 08:42 PM | Link to this

Hey Gator Fan why dont you commit to picking yp the tab for it dimwit….dont go spening my money to benifit your pathetic life as a football wannabe by thinking the Falcons actually give a sh it if you root for them or not

By Falcman

September 6, 2006 08:49 PM | Link to this

We will need one by then. And please move it to the burb’s with parking.

By Jenny

September 6, 2006 08:59 PM | Link to this

NO!

It’s not a question of need, it is a question of WANT. The Georgia Dome is a perfectly fine and suitable home for the Falcons.

Maybe if the Falcons weren’t such a joke more people would be supportive of the idea of a new stadium.

What is the point in building a new stadium for a crappy team?

By chris

September 6, 2006 09:03 PM | Link to this

I love some of the rationale on this blog for building a new stadium. Its too easy to say, “we need a new stadium b/c the Dome is ugly, boring, in a part of town that doesn’t suit me, etc, etc.”

Keep in mind the reality of building a new stadium is we/us/you tax payers will foot a substantial part of the cost and also be hit with increased costs to purchase individual and season tickets. What the fans in other towns have had to do is by a PSL (Personal Seat License) just to get the right to purchase season tickets. Additionally, the Dome would still not necessarily go away. With it being state owned its a mixed use facility used for other functions, i.e. bowl games, concerts, conventions, etc. And they book it in a 6-10 year window (if not farther out) so they probably already have business on the books at least 10 years out. So its just not that simple to just tear it down and build something new. Plus some of the land just west of the dome is protected and I believe on the historical register. So then then the question of where to build it comes into question because it has to be built in the city center to make it as convenient for as many people in the metro area as possible.

Unless he gets something worked out with the state (and I’m sure the city is going to want to get there hands in the pot as well). I don’t see a new stadium but a greatly renovated Dome.

Oh and those who think we need a new stadium to get a Super Bowl. Wrong - we landed two in the last 12 years that were played at the Dome. Weather is why we lost the last bid. If you build a stadium outside the city you can almost be assured we won’t get another SB. The NFL looks at many factors beyond the stadium when considering a site and one is the number of hotel rooms within a certain vicinity of the stadium as well as transportation options.

By Jake

September 6, 2006 09:27 PM | Link to this

Sounds like a bunch of poor and ignorant ducks. Quit complaining about people with money and go make your own. He invested his money in the franchise and he should expect the best. If you don’t like it stay home and invest that ticket money in to something else. Crybaby!

By Lee

September 6, 2006 09:28 PM | Link to this

Yes, build a new state of the art stadium .. just put it anywhere but the City of Atlanta…PLEASE

By JR

September 6, 2006 09:31 PM | Link to this

Sure, build it. So long as he pays for it and not the tax payers.

By Steve

September 6, 2006 09:34 PM | Link to this

Who cares-it’s the Falcons! College football rules here. If Mr. Blank pays for a new building-go for it! I wont be paying for any tickets anyway.

By lee sunset

September 6, 2006 09:42 PM | Link to this

Just as long as it’s not a dome…

By dawgsrule

September 6, 2006 09:43 PM | Link to this

Yes, I’d like a new office building also. Will taxpayers pay for it? No. Art—build your stadium of your dreams with your own money. And get rid of that pathetic, incompetent coaching staff and bring in some winners, like Mark Richt.

By ReadMyLipsNoNewTaxes

September 6, 2006 09:58 PM | Link to this

dj great comments. my folks live in Kansas city, so I followed the chiefs vote from here. you make a great point!!!

By Mike

September 6, 2006 10:04 PM | Link to this

I can see it now - all in orange - “Home Depot Field” - Let’s just hope and pray it’s an outdoor stadium where real football is played.

By NumbaOneFan

September 6, 2006 10:14 PM | Link to this

My take on this issue is….. The dome is a good facility but, the neighborhood iit is in leaves a lot to be desired of. I have a ttended a handful of games in the dome and personally hate the surrounding hood. The questionable element in this area is pi$$ poor at best. One has to deal with all the inconvenience of nightmarish traffic congestion, lack of sufficient parking, shopping, entertainment venues such as restaurants and bar not to mention the low lifes that inhabit this section of town. I would attend more games if only the above conditions would ne addressed. The last thing I want to see after plunking down my hard erned dollars is thugs and delapidated houses with questionable characters offering to let you park your car in that dreaful area. Nothing to do with a race card folks… just telling like it is. I agree that the Falcons and Arthur want a better deal and a newr facility but it must come out of his pocket not out of the taxpayers. And please move it to a decent area Arthur otherwise there are lot of people that will never come to the game due to the area, the lack of parking and the questionable characters and their surroundings.

By Cobb Resident

September 6, 2006 10:27 PM | Link to this

Shoulda, woulda, shut-up and play football! All the anti-downtown/new dome critics on this board (i could get mugged…or, the cost..) sound like a bunch of suburban wimps! Man-up!! So goes ATL, so goes the region. If you don’t believe it, take ATL out of Georgia and you have East Alabama.

By KP

September 6, 2006 10:34 PM | Link to this

And how much will it be for a family of five to attend a game then — $700-plus. We have more important issues to fund and fix —like Atlanta imploding on its traffic problems.

By Rich

September 6, 2006 10:35 PM | Link to this

Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is mentally retarded and should be ignored

By Rick

September 6, 2006 10:42 PM | Link to this

Maybe Mr. blank will make a donation to the people of Georgia similiar to the one his business partner Mr. Marcus made in building the GA Aquarium. But I would not hold my breath since Mr. Blank holds Falcons fans hostage each year by forcing us to by season tix to the GA Force if we want tickets to the Falcons. I am guessing we the taxpayers and season ticket holders will get the short end of this deal.

By Robert Sams

September 6, 2006 10:46 PM | Link to this

Mr. Blank, just bring the Super bowl ring home and I’ll build you a new stadium!

By Rob

September 6, 2006 10:51 PM | Link to this

I believe Mr. Blank is the one who knows what will make it work for him to bring in the best free agency talent. I now live in Tampa and have seen the environment at RAYMOND JAMES STADIUM. It is electric with acres and acres of grass and trees for tailgating and fan interaction. Move it south of Atlanta and get it out of downtown. Too much crime and too much MARTA.

By Give Thanks to Mr. Blank

September 6, 2006 10:58 PM | Link to this

Yes, Absolutely we need a new stadium. Tax money only should be used to pay for the new facility. Preferably a retractable dome, you know, to keep out the freezing weather that we have here in December.

Perhaps a state tax could be imposed (not just Atlanta) to raise the revenue. The entire state benefits from the Falcons therefore everyone should chip in. Besides, it’s about time you people in the suburbs paid your fair share.

I simply cannot get over how ungrateful you people are acting. Remember how crappy the Falcons were before Mr. BLank took ownership? You should all be bowing down to Mr. Blank and asking him if he’d like anything else. You should be grateful that Mr. Blank wants to keep the Falcons here and not move them to Los Angeles.

Mr. Blank WILL get his new stadium and there is nothing you can do about it. You just wait and see!

By Harold

September 6, 2006 10:59 PM | Link to this

Drain the tofu shark tub and let them play in there.

By zeke

September 6, 2006 11:06 PM | Link to this

Well, why not? Anywhere but downtown is acceptable! But, it needs a lot of interstate access and parking! No marta please! Why everyone thinks a stadium or arena has to be downtown is baffling to me! Why build in an area with no parking, traffic problems and limited transportation access! Stupid I do believe!

By Wedgie Evans

September 6, 2006 11:15 PM | Link to this

How about we focus on winning a Super Bowl before upgrading our stadium. Seems to me that we haven’t accomplished that yet.

By Robert Watkins

September 6, 2006 11:58 PM | Link to this

I hate to see them spend the money….but a retractable dome would be a huge asset for the city…I remember wishing that was a part of the original Ga Dome design….

By Ron Mexico

September 7, 2006 12:00 AM | Link to this

Personally I’d like to see football played outside AND DOWNTOWN!! Why build a stadium even furthur away from public transportation?

The Dome was never a state of the art facility. I stopped going to concerts there because unless you’re sitting directly in front of the speakers you can’t hear anything. The sound bounces off of everything.

By atl

September 7, 2006 12:01 AM | Link to this

HECK NO!!

people are fools who say YES. This is a PRIVATELY owned team yet he wants GOVT to pay for part of his business?! Are you kidding me???

It’s football people, if people really love the falcons than the ticket paying public will pay for it, but to expect non football fans to pay the tab is OUTRAGEOUS!!!!! Where in our Constitution does it say ‘the public shall raise funds for sports venues’

my god, will it ever end????????

By Jason

September 7, 2006 12:04 AM | Link to this

Poor poor suburbanites. They can feel the darkness closing in on them. A stadium won’t save your decaying strip malls or improve your traffic. The writing is on the wall, the age of the cartopia suburb is over. The criminals are being pushed out of the city into your neighborhoods. Your spacious affordable McMansions are making great flop houses and drug distribution centers. Whine all you want, but all you have to look at is the fact that Arthur Blank yanked the Force out of Gwinnett and put them downtown. He’s not a dummy, he did that for a reason. Enjoy your future of decline and broken dreams. And don’t worry, MARTA won’t be expanded out into your neighborhood… afterall, we don’t want “those people” coming into our revitalized city.

By Steven Hammond

September 7, 2006 12:13 AM | Link to this

No we do not need a new stadium this year or next year, but by the year 2016 the stadium will be 24 years old and ready to be replaced. It should have a retractable roof like someone said so we can enjoy the beautiful fall days we have here and we could have real grass. It would be great if it was in a place where it was not the only attraction and where there was life around it at times other than just when there are games. The only Sports venue in Atlanta with much pregame or post game life is Phillips Arena with the CNN center.

By Steven Hammond

September 7, 2006 12:14 AM | Link to this

No we do not need a new stadium this year or next year, but by the year 2016 the stadium will be 24 years old and ready to be replaced. It should have a retractable roof like someone said so we can enjoy the beautiful fall days we have here and we could have real grass. It would be great if it was in a place where it was not the only attraction and where there was life around it at times other than just when there are games. The only Sports venue in Atlanta with much pregame or post game life is Phillips Arena with the CNN center.

By Michael Corbitt

September 7, 2006 12:19 AM | Link to this

By the time 2016 rolls around, Atlanta will be due a new stadium. Anything over 25 years old needs to be level or remodeled. If you don’t think so look at the pre-Katrina Superdome. Granted its surroundings did not help any, it still looked like a piece of crap.

By Rick

September 7, 2006 12:33 AM | Link to this

Arthur needs to take a tractor and long rope and pull his head out of his other end. Produce a CONSISTENT winner. The Falcons have not produced a consistent winner in the 40 years they have been in Atlanta. Do this and we will talk about it. Your buddies Jim Mora and Michael Vick haven’t exactly built a dynasty.

HELLO! You got a great deal on the Falcons. For Christ’s sake, don’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

By budmister

September 7, 2006 01:16 AM | Link to this

yip yacking and jaw jacking is all i hear? Whats wrong with being positive about this thing? You can still be a realist about the stadium issue.First of all Arthur Blank has put his money where his mouth is. He,s ponyed up the dough to get the free agents and deals we got this year.Nothing but class is what this guy is about and bringing a championship to atlanta because we deserve it.Hey look at it like this the Smith family would have us in the Georgia Dome until It was as retro as lime green carpet! Blanks right in my opinon in 2015 were gonna need a new one. Im glad he,s on top of things. thanks Mr.Blank

By Ken

September 7, 2006 01:21 AM | Link to this

In Nimes, Spain, there is a Roman coliseum built in 1 A.D. for gladiator fights and used now, 2005 years later, for bullfights, opera and tennis matches. In Atlanta, we build fabulously expensive arenas and tear them down in 25 to 30 years. At 55, I have seen too many great buildings go up and come back down in our disposable city.

By scott

September 7, 2006 01:25 AM | Link to this

shoot yeah we need it……and why not build another stone mountain too? why dont we try to actually win a super bowl instead of just hosting it. scott jsfjsfjsf121212@hotmail.com

By Sub Burb

September 7, 2006 01:51 AM | Link to this

Some idiot referenced the fact that there was a shooting at the Mall of Georgia to imply that the suburbs have crime/don’t diss downtown Atlanta. Excuse me, but did you see WHO committed the crime? Thugs who crawled out of your paradise/cesspool of Atlanta. Keep the millionaire playpen downtown. Along with the filthy panhandlers, the murderous muggers and the diease-ridden crack hos.

By Shooter

September 7, 2006 01:58 AM | Link to this

Thanks, Blank You have my permission to build anything you want but please leave the taxpayers out of it.

By Mike

September 7, 2006 02:20 AM | Link to this

Its always good to see the downtown Atlanta haters no matter what the subject. Maybe you guys can move to Utah and join the others out there in the desert and mountains.

By Freddy

September 7, 2006 02:20 AM | Link to this

Blank loses money because the GA Dome is publicly built. He wants a more privately funded stadium, as have to wealthiest franchises, for added revenue, which is needed if the Falcons are ever going to stop being one of the historically-worst franchises and become competitive every season.

By p

September 7, 2006 02:32 AM | Link to this

not, no. HELL NO!

screw blank. he’s obviously confused a sport with the contribution to atlanta by his old partner.

By Thomas

September 7, 2006 02:56 AM | Link to this

Um, bonds accrue interest which is paid by taxpayers. Instead of financing public projects, that tax money funds interest.

Oh, assinine comes to mind when I hear Blank talk about building a new stadium.

The Peach Bowl has become one of the top bowls because of the stadium some have been paning.

The NFL has not come back to Atlanta becasue of the ice storm that hit during the last Super Bowl and the lack of indoor facilites for both teams. So, yeah, brilliant suggestion to go with an open air stadium in Atlanta to attrach a January sporting event.

Artie “I have to stroll the sidelines” Blank is the consummate defintion of a jcok sniffer. I hope he never gets his hands on the Braves and can mismanage them. To bad Artie never learned how to finesse a salary cap like, oh, the Patriots. Of course, Vick would have to take a voluntary pay cut like Brady. Can forget that.

By Peter

September 7, 2006 04:11 AM | Link to this

It’s almost impossible to underestimate the lack of sophistication of the Atlanta sports “fan”. We don’t fill up any building even if the team is winning.

Most of the people who complain about the costs associated with professional sports. The teams in Atlanta have some the lowest revenue in their respective leagues. Now while two of those teams don’t really deserve much support that can hardly be said now of the two other teams.

Teams here have some of the lowest ticket prices in their sports. So many complain that don’t buy tickets now and never have and never will. They want others to foot the bill so that they may watch on TV.

Arthur Blank will get a new stadium and the city and state will help pay or some other city will stand up and foot the entire cost for him. Look at Houston, Baltimore, Cleveland. They paid much more to regain a team than they would have if they’d just built the stadium initially. He wants a new stadium and the league will stand behind him on that.

Time for us to grow up.

By Tommy

September 7, 2006 05:10 AM | Link to this

Keep on having these seasons like you had last year and you will need a new stadium. one that will hold about 15,000 people because loosing will make hater in HURRY. I been a FALCON FAN for a long time I didn’t jump on the band wagon when you bought the team, I suffered through the Smith Era. With GM and Ford closing down there is you a some of land to buy and build what ever you want. But understand this, Like Al Davis says “JUST WIN BABY”, This aint Green Bay. These folks only show up for a winner, and that is factual!

By wayne

September 7, 2006 07:08 AM | Link to this

let him pay for it not the tax payers of ga. mosst people of ga, get no use out of it. a bad investment…

By Joe

September 7, 2006 07:10 AM | Link to this

Yes, it should be considered. Historically, 2016 is the approximate time frame for replacing a major league football stadium. Starting the process now should provide ample time to consider most alternatives. It should, however, be in downtown Atlanta. However, unlike the Atlanta Braves stadium and Atlantic Station, ensure that there is Marta TRAIN access to the stadium, NOT bus. Financially, use a 1 cent state tax to supplement the cost of the stadium. The stadium and major league football will benefit all of Georgia.

By John Henry

September 7, 2006 07:15 AM | Link to this

I agree Atlanta needs a new stadium. And, I need a new Lexus, a new million dollar house near Stonecrest mall, a condo in Midtown and my own restaurant in Atlantic Station and I want it ALL by 2007…..to replace the old ones, of course.

By J Pherd

September 7, 2006 07:17 AM | Link to this

If Blank wants tax money to underwrite the stadium, then we have to question whether the city needs this. If he fulfills his obligation on the current lease and pursues a new stadium with his own money, it doesn’t matter if we think the city needs it or not. The Falcons are a private business. Bottom line is that it is not the responsibility of the local tax payer to make sure that the Falcons franchise appreciates in value.

By Sally Hardin

September 7, 2006 07:20 AM | Link to this

Why should taxpayers, many of whom will never use the stadium, pay for something that provides great profits to individuals?

By Ken

September 7, 2006 07:20 AM | Link to this

Let’s move the stadiun out of the getto and somewhere there is paved parking and not someone’s yard and security. I refuse to go and walk through filth to get to the game

By Corey

September 7, 2006 07:22 AM | Link to this

“Nothing to do with a race card folks”

Please!

By Lee West

September 7, 2006 07:27 AM | Link to this

Since Atlanta is moving south towards LaGrange, why does’t he build his own stadium on I-85 in Troup County. Fans could reach the stadium quicker than they can in downtown Atlanta. We would welcome it here…

By kennybob

September 7, 2006 07:30 AM | Link to this

Let’s make a deal, bring home a superbowl win and you get a new stadium. Atlanta fans have waited too long.

By J.Kelly

September 7, 2006 07:35 AM | Link to this

I have been a season ticket holder for 10 years and this scares me. The one reason I have maintained these tickets is because of reasonable price over the years. This is all about two words “seat licenses”. All across the country in NFL cities, they get a new stadium and require all ticket holders to pay a large one time fee to own the seat. When that happens, there goes my season tickets.

By This gets old

September 7, 2006 07:37 AM | Link to this

Arthur Blank did not get a great deal on the Falcons. He paid far and above the value of the franchise. It’s worth more now because the Dome is sold out. It’s sold out because he’s paid HIS money to bring in better people through out the organization.

We have some of the lowest revenue in the league now. No owner is putting his own money into the team to the degree that Blank has had to.

People are funny, all of the critcs talk about public money going into a private individuals pockets. If the team were to make plans to move the same people would be talking about “our” team. Can’t have it both ways. Pay now or pay much more later.

By Steve

September 7, 2006 07:46 AM | Link to this

For some reason I think this has something to do with losing the Super Bowl bid on the last 2 attempts. Maybe I am wrong ….

By Burroughston Broch

September 7, 2006 07:47 AM | Link to this

Blank and the Falcon fans should pay for his new stadium, not the taxpayer. The taxpayer has been recently hosed for the Dome and Turner Field. He will then threaten to take the Falcons elsewhere if he doesn’t get what he wants at public expense. When that happens, I say, “HIT THE ROAD.”

By holmz

September 7, 2006 07:52 AM | Link to this

Oh yeah, I hope they build a new dome in a bad neighborhood with its own Marta station. We don’t want to end up like loser New Orleans and their not-so-Super dome that is clearly out-dated.

By robert

September 7, 2006 08:00 AM | Link to this

Start planning now. And build it in Gwinnett. Let the fans own stock in the team and help differ the cost. Sell PSL rights.Im in . I want a piece of the action. And new vendors, non union. With new bids on vending leases yearly. No crappy consessions,owned by the state. All privately owned and operated vendors. Sell the naming rights to pick up a chunk of the tab. Set it up as an I.P.O on the market. Dont give the state an ounce of say in it.

By sherry

September 7, 2006 08:03 AM | Link to this

no, no, no!!!!!

By Mac

September 7, 2006 08:05 AM | Link to this

Tell him to take that joke of a team and that over paid Vick to another city.

By robert

September 7, 2006 08:07 AM | Link to this

Wait Im not done . Build little cabanas in the parking lot and rent them out. With kitchenettes and bathrooms.Have rally campouts in the parking lot the night before games and set up vendors and maybe a band or two. Hey aurthur Im just full of ideas , and Im pumped to the max . Send me an Email, Id be honored to help you with the project.

By Cobb Lady

September 7, 2006 08:11 AM | Link to this

If Arthur wants a new stadium he should build it with his own money.

It is time for the government to get out of the stadium business.

By Anita

September 7, 2006 08:14 AM | Link to this

I think that this is a waste of money and resources. Are there not more important things in life that need financial support?

By CBG

September 7, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this

Greedy folks make greedy requests. Georgia (and especially Atlanta) needs its infrastructre repaired much more than another stadium.

By Glenn

September 7, 2006 08:22 AM | Link to this

It is ubsurd that our NFL team plays in a dome. The experience is so sterile & the fall weather here is so nice. To all those people who say the government shouldn’t pay for it remember, Rankin Smith didn’t want the Falcons playing in a dome. The local government forced it on him so they could land the Olympics. If the city doesn’t want to pony up fine, The northern suburbs can hold them & they will continually sell out. Just another reason not to go into the city.

By Jake

September 7, 2006 08:25 AM | Link to this

FYI. There are alot of companies here in Georgia that tax payers are footing the bill for not just the Falcons. I bet you Sonny is not revealing that to you! You will be paying for a stadium in the next ten years. If you don’t like it, MOVE!

By Tygger

September 7, 2006 08:26 AM | Link to this

We need a stadium with fresh air, real grass, designed specifically for football to attract (or grow?) real sports fans, not serve as a corporate convention center. The Georgia Dome is not a football stadium. It’s an auditorium. It’s a shame with the weather we have in Atlanta to have to sit and watch football played on carpet under fluorescent lights.

By brian

September 7, 2006 08:28 AM | Link to this

Careful out there folks. Ya’ll start talking about moving the field out of the city and into other locales and the Fulton County Commission will track you down and slap a hate crime on you..it’s all about race! Also, watch out for those anti-union words. Unions have fallen from 25% of the workforce in 1980 to 12% today. From the airport to the dome, unions rule the roost. Say anything about wanting to get rid of them and they may come after you and kick your a$$.

By Nate E

September 7, 2006 08:38 AM | Link to this

A new stadium??? Yeah right…and people in Hell want ice water too.

By Carlton Wyatt

September 7, 2006 08:39 AM | Link to this

If Blank wants a new stadium, he should build one. Using his own money. Government subsidies for professional sports teams needs to STOP. Arthur Blank does not need welfare money. Let him use his own money and money he can raise from investors.

By Thrash

September 7, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

Build it where the fans are, which is not in hellhole westside downtown Atlanta.

By Antonio

September 7, 2006 08:43 AM | Link to this

If a new stadium is built, I hope that no state money is involved. I don’t live in Atlanta, and I don’t want my tax dollars going to such a project where there are other needs in the state.

If Blank wants a new stadium, let his Home Depot company build it. I’m quite sure that they can get the material cheap.

By Grit

September 7, 2006 08:43 AM | Link to this

He took our flag now he wants to break us. Go back where you came from.

By Jean

September 7, 2006 08:44 AM | Link to this

We have service people losing their lives in the Middle East, military families barely making ends meet (if at all), we have extraordinary fuel costs all over the world, we have unsecured borders in America—and Mr. Blank wants a stadium. Hmmmm…let me see…that sounds a bit SELFISH. I could care less about the Falcons and any team that threatens a city/state with “moving” if they do not get their bling-bling stadium. If it were up to me, I’d tell Blank to start packing and take his precious boys with him. Good riddance.

By Jack

September 7, 2006 08:57 AM | Link to this

NEW STADIUM!!!!King Arthur just bundle up your franchise and dont let the doorknob hit you in the rear as you leave town. This we dont need.

By Randall

September 7, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

If he builds it will I come? No. Just like I haven’t been to his overpriced aquarium yet either. And just like Turner Field, I won’t go because it seems that most of the people want to limit who can and cannot “afford” to attend their facilities. They forget that a lot of “common” people were their biggest supporters and fans, but they don’t care. It’s sad really. I guess I’m a traditionalist and didn’t want the Fulton Co. Stadium torn down for the braves, but at least they were a winning team…

By opieandy

September 7, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this

While it’s absurd to start talking about a new stadium, whenever one is eventually built I hope Blank will realize that football is an OUTDOOR game not meant to be played in a large living room. The dome, any dome, is a ridiculous place to watch a football game.

By ROU

September 7, 2006 09:03 AM | Link to this

nope,,,,let king arthur spend his $ for his own toyz…

By opieandy

September 7, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this

While talk of a new stadium in Atlanta is ridiculous, I hope when Blank eventually builds one (with his own money), he will realize that football is an OUTDOOR sport, not meant to be played in an air-conditioned living room. Watching football in a dome is absurd.

By Consultant

September 7, 2006 09:13 AM | Link to this

I think I understand Blank’s point. But as a businessman, he knew the terms of the Dome lease when he bouught the team. Public backing was used to build the Dome, and private owners are allowed to earn huge returns from owning the team, along with others (TV) who provide related services. If Blank wants a better financial deal, then he, not the public, should pay for the deal. After all, the Dome is not falling apart. This is all about the money. I respect Mr. Blank. But on this one, he has to do it himself.

By dawgsrule

September 7, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

If they ever build a new stadium, please build it outside of the downtown Atlanta ghetto where it’s at least safe to walk around before and after the game, without a bunch of crack thugs hanging around looking for money.

By David

September 7, 2006 09:16 AM | Link to this

Yes! Definitely. We need an outdoor stadium. Watching football indoors at the Georgia Dome just ain’t right. Football was meant to be played outside…Oh, and by the way, Arthur Blank didn’t build the aquarium.

By Rich

September 7, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

I agree with Chad. If they do build another stadium let’s get it outside the perimeter.I am not in favor of a new stadium being built. We “the taxpayers” ultimately end up paying for most of it through increased taxes for rooms etc. I do like the idea of a retractable roof.

By Eco Nomick

September 7, 2006 09:23 AM | Link to this

It’s funny in a pathetic sort of way to read how the aquarium is “overpriced” and “overrated.” If you are such a poor-arse loser that you cannot ‘afford” tickets, then don’t go. But stop whining about it. Where is it ‘sketched in stone’ that you have a ‘right’ to buy anything at a price that you, in your cretinous wisdom, ‘feel’ is ‘fair’? Same thing with Falcons tickets. Try not to sound like such an envious embittered socialist!

By isproab

September 7, 2006 09:24 AM | Link to this

Yes we will need a new stadium. One of the main new revenue streams for teams is stadium naming rights/corporate sponsorship. No company wants to attach its name to an old building that is yesterday’s news. A new facility will attract fans during the season plus have restaurants and things to attract people during the off season.

The facilities keep teams competitive all the way around. You have nice facilities, players want to come here. Bad stadium deals and the lack of new stadiums have caused teams to move. I doubt many fans/residence of Atlanta want to see the team leave. They leave that means money and revenue goes bye-bye. Guess who has to make up for that lost revenue, the tax payers.

By Hoobleegoobleemain

September 7, 2006 09:25 AM | Link to this

Atlanta don’t need one but The Falcons DO! + What K-Dog said. How bout at the Doraville GM Plant.

By Mayretta Local

September 7, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

this is absurd, a new stadium?? why not just paint the old one a better color?? so nice of a private citizen to want to spend taxpayers’ money. get lost.

By Mack

September 7, 2006 09:29 AM | Link to this

Yes,Atlanta will need a new stadium by 2016. The present one will be outdated by then. You need to start ahead of time to plan for the future. I wish the DOT had more of the same mindset about traffic in the Atlanta area, planning well ahead of time. This will be a different city in 2016 so you have to adjust for that. With the advance planning I hope we get a real good stadium, one with a retractable roof. It would be very nice to watch a game in the open air with the good weather we have here. Also the stadium needs to stay in the Atlanta city limits on a public transit line and in a area with easy access.

By dude

September 7, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

Mr. Blank can surely find cheap materials at Home Depot to build the new facility, but he should go to Lowe’s, where they have a larger selection of materials and better quality.

By dude

September 7, 2006 09:38 AM | Link to this

Mr. Blank can surely find cheap materials at Home Depot to build the new facility, but he should go to Lowe’s, where they have a larger selection of materials and better quality.

By KW

September 7, 2006 09:42 AM | Link to this

What the hell are all you thinking? In 10 years the dome will be OLD and everyone will be griping about it. Mr. Blank is a forward thinker, unlike the rest of you idiots out there who won’t plan ahead or think about the future. Thank you Arthur - keep it up! Atlanta needs more people like you.

By Dave

September 7, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

The money should be used to build housing for the poor, food for the hungry,job programs, law enforcement and teacher pay, and more customer service support at Home Depot. The last time I wandered around Home Depot looking for some help, I became hungry, homeless, stupid, criminally minded, and got fired for missing work.

By J.B.

September 7, 2006 10:07 AM | Link to this

Let’s move the stadium to the Stockbridge area. Henry County is on a building spree, so what difference will a national football stadium make?

By Bri

September 7, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

We are in the largest, fastest growing city in the South. They are building on every block and street corner. We should be proud to have a new, state-of-the-art facility. However, is anyone not reading the articles? It’s not about the building itself, although it will be old in 10 more years. With ALL the money this city generates, and ALL of its venues and attractions, why should the Falcons organization be less profitable than teams located in cities with less appeal. The Falcons play in a publicly owned and run facility. The State of Georgia is not an active part of the NFL, are they?! The Falcons deserve to be profitable. And yes Arthur will be richer. He’s he owner. But WE are the fans. The Falcons are our team. How can we settle to be at the bottom of the league in anything? And yes, he knew what he bought. He’s not trying to back out of a deal already in place. Arthur is a brilliant man. He’ll find the $$ to back the project. He needs the public to back his vision!

By Edgar

September 7, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

Yes we do. The Ga Dome is in the mold of the ’80s type of stadium that is now out-dated. Check out the High Def Discovery Channel and take a look at the new Arizona Cardinal Stadium. What a facility!! Suited completely for the NFL. The GA Dome needs wider seats, isles, better facilities for concessions, retractable roof for days that we just don’t need the wasted energy for air conditioning. That just scratches the surface. It needs to be more suited for media. The setup now isn’t conducive to today’s type of coverage that is demanded by the fan at home or the networks. Camera angles and such are just the beginning. For HDTV better lighting is needed to give the fan at home a better picture of the game. The feed that we get in HD now from the Dome isn’t near what it should be. Parking is another problem that was never addressed for the present facility. If those of us that were here for the opening of the Dome the city didn’t want any vehicles to come to the games. Their plan was to have everyone come to the game via MARTA. Cars got towed and the police refused to provide any type of assistance for heavy traffic. It was a mess for a while until things just kind of worked themselves out. Now we do have lots that are there for us to get permits but they’re not close to the facility by any means. Even Lot A is about a 15 minute walk to the front of the stadium. But you have a nightmare trying to get out of the facility especially when it’s a game that goes to the wire. Sometimes it can be a 2 hour ordeal getting out of the city. That’s only a few things that need to be addressed folks. 10 years from now is a good date to shoot for. 2010 would be even better.

By Jeff

September 7, 2006 10:34 AM | Link to this

Is Mr. Blanks a second cousin once removed of Al Davis, owner of the L.A. — oops — the Oakland Raiders?

By ATLANTA Falcons

September 7, 2006 10:42 AM | Link to this

For all you suburban clowns who want Arthur to build a new stadium outside of the city I think you need to take a look at the name of the team. They are not named the Alpharetta Falcons, Gwinnett Falcons, Kennesaw Falcons or any other stupid little one step away from redneckville suburban town, they are the ATLANTA Falcons. The Falcons need to stay in Atlanta. I don’t really care if he builds the stadium in Downtown or in Buckhead just as long as it is in ATLANTA and not some redneck outpost to make you OTP jerks happy.

I actually have a great idea of where the new stadium could be built. Why not just demolish the 5 points area south of Marietta street (underground Atlanta included) and build the new stadium there along with shops, retail and restaruants.

And for the love of God can it be an open air stadium. I hate walking to the Georgia Dome on a beautiful fall Sunday afternoon only to have to go sit inside and watch the Falcons play football.

By Dre

September 7, 2006 10:55 AM | Link to this

Thank You Edgar for telling the truth. New Cardinal stadium is just beautiful. But I seriously never had an issue with parking myself, just get on the train or get there earlier and stop playing around in traffic. It’s a stadium with thousands of people and cars. You’re gonna have issues, stop complaining and whinning like babies people. Yes, in 10 years the Dome will be outdated. It’ll be 24 years old then. The Omni was 25 when it came tumbling down. By 2016, the dome will be out of style and possibly the MOST outdated stadium in the league. I’m sure most other cities with older stadiums will have updated by then. I really would hate to see a corporate name slapped on the side of it though. Both the Ga. Dome and Turner Field have done great without the corporate tag. It’ll be best to leave that alone, especially if the company goes under for example Candlestick Park in S.F., how many names did it have Monster Park, 3Com? Oh what about the AT&T Stadium. It was Pac Bell, then SBC now AT&T. That’s horrible.

By Greg from Marietta

September 7, 2006 11:34 AM | Link to this

It’s all about money, so why not build a new Sports Complex - not just a stadium -* in North Cobb or South Cherokee County*. This way it will be closer to the people that buy the tickets and attend the events. Besides the land is more abundant and priced lower per acre.

By Dennis C

September 7, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

This is just a good negotiation act to get more of the revenues, ie off of the $7.75 Beer and concessions!

By C.J. Mullen

September 7, 2006 12:45 PM | Link to this

Absolutely NO, get over it. Run along. Not now, not ever. Good grief? A new stadium? Why?

By Wes

September 7, 2006 01:23 PM | Link to this

The Dallas Cowboys play in Irving. The Washington Redskins play in Maryland. Both New York teams play in New Jersey. The Patriots play in Foxboro (noted, though, that there name doesn’t say Boston). The Tampa Bay Bucs play in St. Pete.

Some morons above (notably Ryan) state that it is a city’s right to have a team located in the city that carries its name. That goes away when the city rapes the team in property and luxury taxes, where some suburbs would not (particularly somewhere in Gwinnett County, the old GM plant is a great idea).

Its a good idea. Its a long, long time before anything gets started. But it should probably be moved from downtown - so long as it is too a location with marta access (and I mean the train).

By Pago Pago

September 7, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this

You ticket holders and tax payers will pay for his new dome stadium. Can’t imagine anybody going to a pro game (boring), ( or college game) in a dome stadium, it’s like a giant tv studio.

By CK

September 7, 2006 02:57 PM | Link to this

I want the Falcons to build a bigger and better version of the old Atlanta Stadium (AFCS). AFCS’s sightlines could have been better, yet the ballpark offered a vibrant atmosphere. Natural grass, beautiful colors on seats and on walls, a cantilevered roof over the upper deck, and an ability to host several sports. I miss that atmosphere!!

This new stadium should be rectangular or oval, so that seats are closer to the field than they would be in round venues. Football and soccer could be the primary events, but retractable seats for baseball are a decent option, too. If the Braves ever face an emergency at Turner Field or many years from now need another new ballpark, they could use this new stadium for at least a short time. Multisport stadiums can offer better sightlines and better amenities than round venues of the past could. Obviously, this setup would be similar to the Metrodome, but the venue will be more modern than the HHH Metrodome is. If it is rectangular or oval, you can get better sightlines and a bigger number of seats than you could in the round venues.

The glories of Atlanta Stadium must rise again!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for your time.

By CK

September 7, 2006 03:02 PM | Link to this

Poster Tim McDaniel said Daniel Snyder of Washington’s NFL team owns RFK Stadium. That is wrong. That team left RFK Stadium in December of 1996. Snyder owns the team and Fedex Field, which opened in 1997, when John Cooke owned the franchise. Thanks.

By CK

September 7, 2006 03:21 PM | Link to this

The Tampa Bay Devil Rays play in Saint Petersburg, not the Bucanneers.

By Wes

September 7, 2006 03:31 PM | Link to this

My point remains the same CK, but thanks for pointing that out.

By D3

September 7, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this

yes, build a new stadium in the suburbs, make it open air and without that wimpy retractable roof, and let football be played the way it was meant, in the rain, mud, cold and snow. maybe that will keep some of those ‘sit-in-their-seats’, quiet slackers, who just come to be seen, at home. make a huge parking area for tailgating, design the roads around it for easy access. and get the new stadium out of Atlanta, so we can have some decent people, without bad attitudes, as employees working at the stadium, people that don’t have a problem serving the fans that attend the games.

By Michael

September 7, 2006 04:20 PM | Link to this

Yes, Atlanta needs a NEW stadium,Just like it needs championship fans. Maybe, the championship fans can help propel the Falcons into a Superbowl Championship Team. Once the Falcons are Superbowl champs, Then CHAMPIONSHIP FANS can enjoy the NEW champion of stadiums right in the NEW CITY OF CHAMPIONS-ATLANTA.

By Kevin

September 7, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

IF the goal for Atlanta is continued rejentrification of minority areas, then yes build it! IF the goal for Atalnta is to stop wasting tax payer dollars, then let’s rethink it thoroughly!

By CK

September 7, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this

Randall, I share your sadness from when AFCS was torn down. However, you refer to the common people (fans) that some teams seem to ignore. Maybe you mean people of lower incomes. Yes, the money is too big in sports, but I don’t see people as being common or ordinary based on how much money they make. Other factors go into if people are common/ordinary. Money can be (and often is) not related to it. Some people may have ordinary incomes, but that does not necessarily determine if they are common or ordinary. Thanks.

By D3

September 7, 2006 05:25 PM | Link to this

good point, the next stadium better be red and black!

By CK

September 7, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

Justme, you are correct to complain about high taxes/wasted money in the Atlanta Area. However, the Falcons have sold many games out in the last three to four years, at least since fans found enthusiasm with Blank’s ownership. Plus, you say the Falcons have not had a winning team forever. Bull. 1980 12-4, 1991 10-6 with a playoff win, 1998 14-2 Super Bowl runnerup, 2004 11-5 with a playoff win. Thanks.

By CK

September 7, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

FloridaBoy, the Dolphins opened their current stadium in 1987, four years after Dan Marino’s rookie season. They occupied the Orange Bowl through the 1986 season.

By Donovan

September 7, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this

The Georgia Dome is sterile and boring. I love the Falcons and want a stadium that reflects the team’s personality. Look at Turner Field or Raymond James Stadium in Tampa. These are stadiums built around the team and are examples of how cool a stadium can be. They are hip, FUN places to take your date, family, kids, etc. I think the Falcons need a spot like that.

By elissa powell

September 7, 2006 09:25 PM | Link to this

we really dont need it atlanta is already croweded

By Ted McMahan

September 7, 2006 09:48 PM | Link to this

Mr. Blank, Are you trying to be another Rankin Smith? If you do not get your NEW STADIUM BUILT for YOU, I’ll just take my team else where!

Sure there are problems with the current setting and that is parking and for those who demand and area for tailgating.

Have or do these die hart tailgaters been to Ga., Tenn., or Tech and try and find the ideal spot.

The State of Ga. should do like the Univ. of Ga. did this year and have 160(?) or so spots for sale at $20,000 plus but it’s your spot for life.

If you want a new STADIUM, revert back to the old days and build your new statium but without a TOP on It. Put all your fancy suites and Corp. Tax Write OFF Boxes in your new house but let the players test their natural stills in Mother Natures Elements.

Thank you,

Ted McMahan

By Langston Lewis

September 11, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this

Atlanta needs a new stadium, and it should be located where The Atlanta Fulton County Stadium was.

By ray

September 14, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

Arthur can have a new stadium if he’s willing to pay for it. But it needs to stay downtown; and on the Marta line so we can get there without having to pay 30 bucks to park. Sounds like they may have to build it right where the Dome is; which makes you wonder where the Falcons will play during the new construction.