Home > Thinking Right > Archives > 2008 > June > 06 > Entry

Obama’s flimsy resume gives nation liberal cause for alarm

Oh goodness, what have we done?

Democrats desperate to regain the White House, and thus eliminate any obstacle to precipitous flight from the reality that there are, indeed, evil people who wish and will try to kill us, and from the reality that free and functioning markets, and not bureaucrats, distribute wealth, now find themselves with a standard-bearer. My goodness, what have we done?

He’s a charming fellow, no doubt. Charming and most liberal — the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, according to the National Journal. He has come this far, defeating the political machine once thought invincible, the second phase of the Clinton Dynasty, on the promise of change and the vague suggestion that he alone is the messiah who can move America beyond partisanship. On those promises, the young flock to him, enraptured by the rhetoric and his relative youth.

The reality is, of course, that not a one of his admirers can point to a single thing in Barack Obama’s past, and especially in his brief two years in the U.S. Senate, that supports the supposition that he’s anything other than the kind of politician the nation has repeatedly rejected when offered up by national Democrats — George McGovern, Michael Dukakis, John Kerry, Al Gore.

He’s a doctrinaire liberal who, like that wing of the Democratic Party, voted to deny both Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito a place on the U.S. Supreme Court despite their exceptional, undisputed qualifications. He’s a doctrinaire liberal who would lead his party in quick retreat from Iraq and who would offer the nation a round of tax increases that would either destroy the incentive to work or create a new industry in tax avoidance.

Say what you will about Hillary Clinton — the nation is ready to move beyond the Bill and Hill saga — she is a politician whose stature grew through the primaries and who came to make a convincing case that she could be a rational and competent president, if, God forbid, that was America’s choice in November. Like Bill, she is enough of a creature of the polls that she’d never go too far afield of public opinion.

Obama frightens. He appears to believe that the reason terrorists and despots want to kill us is because they don’t really understand us. That’s a common misconception on the left. The proper approach, as he sees it, is to talk, to anybody, without preconditions. Phrase the explanation of our virtues just right and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will have his “aha” moment, where he renounces his desires to push Israel into the sea and sees America’s intentions in Iraq and Afghanistan as honorable. And then Ahmadinejad will do what Nancy Pelosi already thinks he does, and that is help tamp down the violence against our warriors in Iraq.

Undoubtedly, Obama will surround himself with wiser heads, seasoned experts like former U.S. Sen. Sam Nunn of Georgia. But it’s his judgment, combined with a hefty dose of arrogance, that prompts concern. As others have noted, he makes a gaffe in a foreign policy pronouncement — meeting bad guys without preconditions, for example — and then sticks to it. He’d rather embrace a wrongheaded policy than admit that he might have been wrong.

He did the same thing in his slow-fuse response to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s anti-Americanism. The reality is that as a community organizer and as a state senator and U.S. Senator, he’s never had to make executive decisions. His instincts are most likely those of facilitator rather than decision-maker, which is why he’s comfortable thinking of himself as one who brings people together, even when his actual votes and behavior in the U.S. Senate indicates no such thing.

Democrats caught up in the “first black” narrative have made their decision. They have one who knows what he would do on Iraq, though he’s not been there in more than two years. They have one who can wax eloquent on public service, as he did in speaking to graduates of Wesleyan University in Middletown, Conn., on the day before Memorial Day. But not once in the entire commencement speech, which included a laundry list of public service options, did he cite military service as an option. This is the guy who would be commander in chief, who would make decisions that could sacrifice life, and it doesn’t occur to him to mention them in a commencement speech on public service.

My goodness, what have we done?

Permalink | Comments (199) | Post your comment | Categories: Column

Comments

By AJC/DNC Management

June 7, 2008 8:08 AM | Link to this

Aahhh, yes, thee business section goony from the Urinal/DNC has made thee front page, above thee fold:

{{{{Job losses, oil jolt economy, strike up thee band, happy days are here again!!-Michael “Paul Krugman” Kanell, Urinal/DNC}}}}

Front page of a “news” paper circulated mostly in the slums of Atlanta, where today’s whiny headline will be met with the universal question of What’s a job?

I suppose congratulations are in order, the same hack that has been whining about a collapsing economy for the last 7 years solid, never missing a chance to blubber, starting the very day Bush took office, through all of the days of wealth creation and phenomenal growth, finally, after all this time, the toady has some rather depressing numbers to work with.

GFY (good for you.)

By the way, it sure is some coincidence that the same day DukaKerry De Wimp wins the dhimmikrat presidential nomination, the economy collapses.

Trust me, this was no “coincidence.”

I pray for you America.

~~~~~

Well, thank you very much AJC/PMS:

{{{{Climate bill pushed into 2009- GOP blocks global warming legislation-Urinal/DNC}}}}

Write that down on your calendar and remember when energy prices soar in 2009, that it was the GOP that tried to save this atrocity on the poor and needy.

For once the Urinal/DNC spoke the truth.

~~~~~

{{{{“I’m sort of surprised we didn’t seem to get much coverage of Father [Michael] Pfleger’s remarks last week and/or the back story of his past radicalism —- or appearance of same —- along with the infighting with the archdiocese of Chicago and the bishop there,” said reader Tom Stanek, who questioned whether the newspaper was downplaying this story because it was damaging to DukaKerry De Wimp.}}}}

{{{{The AJC has run wire stories on De Wimp and McCain’s relationships with lobbyists and others, but more context is needed to better understand what significance, if any, these relationships might have on how the candidates will govern.-Angela Tuck, Urinal/DNC Ombudsman}}}}

Always glad to help:

“She just always thought that, ‘This is mine. I’m Bill’s wife. I’m white.’ … And then, out of nowhere, came ‘Hey, I’m Barack Obama.’ And she said, ‘Oh damn, where did you come from? I’m white. I’m entitled. There’s a black man stealing my show,’” Father Michael Pfleger said at last Sunday’s services at Trinity United Church of Christ.

“She wasn’t the only one crying,” he said. “There was a whole lot of white people crying.”

We understand the significance of DukaKerry’s twenty year relationship with this racist church, even if you don’t want us to.

But that doesn’t stop the Urinal Staff from submitting comments to their own Vent section:

That Hillary-bashing priest must have been ordained at the Limbaugh Theological School.

If Limbaugh said what your preacher boy said, you wouldn’t be dwelling on the “significance” of his remarks anymore.*

And are all these people standing on the pews in church and cheering Limbaugh listeners?:

Rev Michael Pfleger, Hillary thinks “I’m white I’m entitled”-YouTube

WTF does Limbaugh have to do with that, POS?

By Redneck Convert

June 7, 2008 8:49 AM | Link to this

Well, I see this AJC Management is on here again. I could tell on account of I had to scroll down two screens to get to the Comment part. He must be all constellated again.

I sure hope old man McCain beats this Obama. The best part is nothing will get done in the country. He will veto everything the librul Democrat Congress passes and the librul Democrats will not do nothing McCain wants. A guvmint that does nothing is what we need.

People will go on whining and whining about high gas prices and high food prices and no jobs and a war that goes on 100 years. Well, nobody’s perfect. And leastwise we won’t have one of Those People lording it over us.

Have a good weekend everybody. I’ll return you now to AJC Management. I’ll pray down at the Church of Holiness he finds some Ex-Lax and gets in a better mood.

By James

June 7, 2008 9:09 AM | Link to this

Has anyone stopped to realize that if Obama was a government employee or contractor he could NEVER receive a Top Secret clearance due to some of this activities and associations with “former” terrorists ? And yet we may elect him president ? Democrats, you are correct that McCain is not the best candidate in the world but YOU should be ashamed of yours.

Plain and simple - he is a very, very dangerous Trojan Horse !!

By candide

June 7, 2008 9:14 AM | Link to this

Obama’s resume is thin but thicker than dubya’s was. But that is no example we wish to follow. In any case, Pres. MCCain will be our next leader and he will be tied down pretty well by an overwhelmingly democratic congress. That is the best we can have; he will be cooperative and they will run things.

By alan

June 7, 2008 9:40 AM | Link to this

Jim Wooten — Stop being a Republican party cheerleading automaton who just repeats the same mantra from the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity.

*WHERE IN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION DOES IT SAY ONE MUST HAVE “EXPERIENCE” AND “A THICK RESUME” BEFORE ONE “QUALIFIES” TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT ???? Huh !!! *

HOW MUCH “EXPERIENCE” AND “THICK” OF A RESUME WILL BE ENOUGH, THEN ???

According to our Jeffersonian Democracy, all one needs to “qualify” to run for the head of the Executive branch of government is to be over a certain age and be a tax-paying US-born American Citizen.

In fact, some of our Founding fathers argued that such a job would be better served by an “ordinary tax-paying” citizen rather than an “experienced” politician. Apparently Jim Wooten and his ilk know more than our Founding fathers.

Isn’t it amazing that this NEW “EXPERIENCE” AND “THICK RESUME” REQUIREMENT is often being touted by “Conservative” cycles? They choose to trample on our US constitution but hey, they get to define for us what it means to be “patriiotic” as well.

WE GAVE THE “EXPERIENCED” and “THICK RESUMED” BUSH ADMNISTRATION 8 YEARS TO LEAD AND WHAT HAVE THEY LEFT US??? Never-ending expensive wars, a tanking economy,jobs leaving our shores, uncontrolled govt. spending, highest national debt, biggest expansion of government,highest foreclosures, etc. What is the current approval rating of the “Experienced” and “Thick Resumed” Bush Administartion???

*What did the “EXPERIENCE” AND “THICK RESUME” OF Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush do for us?? *

PLEASE TAKE THE REPUBLICAN BLINDERS OFF FOR ONCE, AND USE YOUR BRAIN.

Alan

By James

June 7, 2008 9:41 AM | Link to this

To Candide:

I don’t know where you do you research but Obama never ran a business, was never the Governor of a huge state and never served in the military (even the National Guard) and never learned to fly jet fighters which even in peactime is a very dangerous occupation (check the miltiary training death statistics).

To say that he is more experienced than President Bush was during his campaign is ludicrous.

I love reasoned debate but you need to go back to school.

By jk

June 7, 2008 9:53 AM | Link to this

@ James - As Alan said above, where in the US CONSTITUTION does it say one must run a business, be a Governor of a huge state, serve in the military (or even the National Guard) and learn to fly jet fighters to run for president ???

Do you and your Republican friends now get to decide for America what the “qualifications” for presidency should be and not the US constitution ???

Lord have mercy !!

JK

By Taxpayer

June 7, 2008 10:06 AM | Link to this

Well, Jim. We clearly need to re-elect Jimmy Carter for president. Just look at the man’s resume. And, surely he has been out of office long enough to not pose a threat as some wanna-be dictator. I say to heck with any stupid term limit thing as long as they are not all consecutive and as long as someone other than a “relation” occupies the white house between terms. I mean, how many Bushes or Kennedys can one country procreate and groom for public service — give us a little diversity in government. Enough with the in-breeding.

By GayGrayGeek

June 7, 2008 10:13 AM | Link to this

jk @ 9:53 - Haven’t you yet noticed that the Republikkkans have no use for anything as pesky and bothersome as the U.S. Constitution?

Taxpayer @ 10:06 - I hear ya about the Political Inbreeding. I’ve been able to vote for POTUS since 1980, and I’ve never had a ballot without at least one Bush or Clinton on it.

By Curious Observer

June 7, 2008 10:17 AM | Link to this

If a “thick resume” were a prerequisite for the presidency, Abraham Lincoln, a one-term Congressman, would never have been elected. And George Washington, an Indian-fighter, land surveyor, and general with no government experience, would never have appeared in the history books.

I’m not impressed with McCain’s credentials. I don’t see how crashing a plane on a carrier deck, getting shot down, wrestling with old men like Strom Thurmond, using the f-word liberally, dumping a cancer-stricken wife in favor of a rich one and committing adultery, and engaging in the Keating Five scandal qualifies him to be president.

These Republican talking points won’t wash. Give that party credit for trying to hang on to the presidency, however desperately, but in the end we will have a fresh perspective in the White House, someone who refuses to operate in the Dubya fashion and who respects the constitution and the will of the people.

By GayGrayGeek

June 7, 2008 10:23 AM | Link to this

Curious @ 10:17 - Remember, in the eyes of the supporters of his party, the only qualification Bushy McClone needs to run for POTUS - the ONLY qualification - is that magical “-R” after his name.

By Dusty

June 7, 2008 10:24 AM | Link to this

Dear jk@9:53

The Constitution gives us the basic qualifications required for the President of the United States. From there we decide by our OWN standards.

For myself, I desire more than a “good speech”. That is the only outstanding quality I find in Obama. That is not enough for me. His negative experiences or no experience are truly “chilling”. Jim Wooten has explained it quite well.

As Obama’s past looms beside him, he deftly “explains” or “deletes” them. But the past is still there and much of it is bigotry as shown in his church, his friends and his wife.

You may think a “good speech” covers all of that. I do not think the influences of his past life and his opinions can be wiped out in a few “political moments” of ‘silver-tongue’ oratory. That is all we get from Obama and it is not enough for the President of the USA.

I want a President who is wise, experienced and a man/women for all people. I will settle for no less.

By GayGrayGeek

June 7, 2008 10:30 AM | Link to this

DustBuster - AFEES, dear, AFEES.

Put up, or shut up.

WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA AND REFUSE TO SUPPORT HER WITH YOUR SERVICE, DUSTY?

By Q&Q

June 7, 2008 10:31 AM | Link to this

TO ALL MY FELLOW AMERICANS….LET’S VOTE OUT THE REPUBLICANS JUST FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF DEFENDING OUR RESPECTFUL CONSTITUTION THAT THEY HAVE TRIED TIME AND TIME AGAIN TO TRAMPLE UPON.

THAT ALONE IS A WORTHY CAUSE. IF WE LOSE OUR CONSTITUTION THAT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS FOUGHT SO HARD TO DRAFT, THAT WILL BE THE END OF OUR BEAUTIFUL AND EXEMPLARY COUNTRY CALLED AMERICA.

IF IT’S WORTH IT, I VOTE “flimsy resume” whatever the hell that means IF AT LEAST, HE WILL RESPECT OUR CONSTITUTION !!

q&q

By WPD

June 7, 2008 10:43 AM | Link to this

** Duster - THAT “BASIC” REQUIREMENT in our Constitution is apparently all what our “not-so wise” Founding fathers thought was necessary to run for the head of the executive branch government. Of course, our founding fathers did not know what they were talking about.

Today in 2008, you have discovered a more “brilliant requirement” than our “not-wise” Founding fathers did. Congratulations !!! **

wpd

By Montrell

June 7, 2008 10:46 AM | Link to this

More typical racist BS from the white man at the AJC, trying to keep the black man down. Obama is clearly the best candidate, and he should win this election easily over that old man mccain. Obama will make big changes, and African-Americans will be running things now, and telling the white people what to do for a change! OBama’s the man!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 10:48 AM | Link to this

By alan June 7, 2008 9:40 AM | Link to this Jim Wooten — Stop being a Republican party cheerleading automaton who just repeats the same mantra from the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity.

Can I ask a really simple question for a simpleton liberal? Why is it when a Conservative Republican here, be it Jim Wooten or someone like me, gives an opinion (and that is ALL it is, you liberal diseased scabs representative of the modern left), why is it that these mangy mongrels on the filthy left only retort with “Well you are just repeating what ‘Rushannity’ says”? (Yes, I know the parenthesis are supposed to be on the outside of the quotation mark at the end of a sentence, but I don’t like it - it just doesn’t look right).

Have any of this mange on the diseased left ever come up with ONE example of what “Rushannity” says that’s been repeated here? Conservatives of course could make the same 5th grade school playground argument about liberals dimobat comments on CNN, ABC, CB.S., NBC, PMSNBC, the New York Slimes, and the Atlanta Urinal Constipation and BACK IT UP.

But, we ARE the adults here on the Right, so that pretty much settles the issue.

Now that the trash bucket has been emptied, have the Algore global walarmists won? Why in the hell is it 93 degrees at the beginning of June?

By Dusty

June 7, 2008 10:49 AM | Link to this

GGG@10:30

I know you like the attention but please…take your dementia meds ASAP!!!

Q &

By getalife

June 7, 2008 11:05 AM | Link to this

Both Senators voted for Iraq funding and cheney’s energy bill big oil wrote. Both are bought and paid for by lobbyists to get to where we are in the economy and gas prices. Both are part of the corrupt Senate.

Both parties and candidates suk and it is insane thinking these two will change the mess they created.

When was the last time government actually worked?

Sure could use another Clinton economy don’t ya think?

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:07 AM | Link to this

Have a good weekend everybody. I’ll return you now to AJC Management. I’ll pray down at the Church of Holiness he finds some Ex-Lax and gets in a better mood.” - by our resident asshat liberal poser

That^^ is the mentality of a diseased liberal scumbucket. If you are a Conservative Republican, you are in a “bad” mood. Sport, when referring to you mangy mutts on the left, you don’t know how Right you are.

Ok, time to get serious…

The headline of a PMSN article:

Gas prices crimping vacation plans?

As prices at the pump hover around $4 a gallon, some Americans are rethinking summer vacation plans. And companies are responding with deals such as credits for gas and free rides for kids.

Let’s do a little 5th grade math for the whineyassed liberal crybabies, shall we? (That article could have come straight from the Atlanta Urinal Constipation).

Two years ago, when Nancy Pelosi & Co. promised they’d DO SOMETHING ABOUT GAS PRICES, gas was at $2.50/gallon on average this time of year. One year ago, gas was up to $3.25/gallon at this time of peak season.

A round trip vacation to Disney, which is roughly 1,000 miles from and to Atlanta including 50 miles for driving around the area down there, based on an overall 25mpg average for your typical minivan on the entire trip, would have cost a family $100 when Nancy Pelosi & RAT Co. made that failed promise of lowering gas prices. Last year that trip would have cost a whopping $130. Today, that same trip would just cause a family to cancel their plans at a cost of $160.

Yes. You read that correctly. Any family who has to scrape up another $60 for a 1,000 mile road trip, NON-GAS RELATED EXPENSES EXCLUDING like a typical 1 night stay near Disney during peak season being $250/night, exclusive of a one day/one person Disney park pass of $71, SURE as hell doesn’t need to be taking a vacation.

(And for you 1970’s hairstyle wearing tatooed liberal punks in Little Five Points, I apologize for the complicated math).

What’s next for the disease of liberalism? Taxing the successful in this nation so families can “afford” to go to Disney World? I wouldn’t put it past them.

By GayGrayGeek

June 7, 2008 11:10 AM | Link to this

getaclue @ 11:05 - The nomination was Hillary’s to lose, and she proceeded to do so. Deal with it - in another hour or so, the Mike Huckabee Of The Democratic Party will have finally Done The Right Thing. Finally.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:12 AM | Link to this

Sure could use another Clinton economy don’t ya think?” - getalife

Along with another Gingrich fiscally Conservative congress circa 1995? You can bet your as-s on that, wastedlife.

By Taxpayer

June 7, 2008 11:15 AM | Link to this

*Democrats desperate to regain the White House, and thus eliminate any obstacle to precipitous flight from the reality that there are, indeed, evil people who wish and will try to kill us, and from the reality that free and functioning markets, and not bureaucrats, distribute wealth, now find themselves with a standard-bearer. *

My Goodness, what are you saying Jim. Please tell me that you are not just another one of those fear-mongers. Are you saying that it’s a dog-eat-dog world out there and that we must all kill or be killed otherwise we are all doomed, doomed I say, doomed. Shall we all line up on the streets with our little cardboard signs. You know the one. “The End Is Here”. Enough, Jim. I choose not to live in fear for that is not living. I choose not to preemptively strike out at everything that scares me. I choose to not try to second-guess everyone else or to impose my values on everyone else. If this is your argument to get people to vote Republican, it won’t do. It is lame.

By getalife

June 7, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this

Sorry GGG,

I have not drank the kool aid. Obama will let you down and the number one rule in politics is never, ever trust a politician. Especially a corrupt Senator.

Rufus,

Yes, that was the last time government actually worked and was not broken.

When they ban lobbyists to reform government back to the people, then government will work.

Until then it is bs and business as usual.

I think the only branch of government that is working is the IRS to get your money they waste.

By @@

June 7, 2008 11:24 AM | Link to this

Who’s the WE Jim?

No UH OHs from me ‘cause I’m not in that WE.

I was reading an article at “The Washington Times” that made me think of Obama.

ARTIFICIAL BEAK ATTACHED TO EAGLE *Will help bird grasp its PREY (emphasis added, mine)

“She’s got a grill,” joked Nate Calvin, the Boise engineer who spent 200 hours designing the complex beak.

The “grill” was exposed when a bit of the synthetic beak broke off during application. But the new beak is only a temporary fix, designed to nail down precise measurements.

The volunteers moved slowly and talked softly as they slipped the beak on and off, making minor adjustments.

Ms. Cantwell plans to use the bird at lectures across the country to teach people not to shoot at raptors.

After the surgery, Ms. Cantwell cradled the eagle and prepared to return Beauty to her aviary, saying: “The eagle has landed, and she has a beak.”

Obama, caged in the aviary with his !?!fine!?! feathered friends. Now’s the time….

UH OH!!!!!!!

By MorningStar

June 7, 2008 11:24 AM | Link to this

y Dusty June 7, 2008 10:49 AM GGG@10:30 I know you like the attention but please…take your dementia meds ASAP!!!

Dusty, I thought all the meds were being consumed by those on this blog who have multiple personalities and manic depressive disorders. MEDS are surely in short supply this morning.

By getalife June 7, 2008 11:05 AM Sure could use another Clinton economy don’t ya think?

Surely you jest Getalife! With the stock market plunging to Middle Earth, and the jobless rate at 5.5%(highest since 86), who would be stupid enough to think of the economy? Perhaps we should follow REDNECK CONVERT down to the Church of Holiness and pray for some Ex-Lax from heaven for some of these people.

By Dusty

June 7, 2008 11:30 AM | Link to this

WhoopeDeeDo @10:43

I had no idea that our founding fathers had written Obama in the Constitution. Maybe your copy is different from mine. After the basic requirements, I get to decide for whom I wish to vote for President of the United States. And it won’t be one with a “flimsy” resume. Go McCain!!

Just to be helpful, here ‘s a definition of FLIMSY. #1.without material strength or solidity #2.weak, inadequte,not carefully thought out.…American College Dictionary

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:37 AM | Link to this

“I think the only branch of government that is working is the IRS to get your money they waste.”

Surprisingly, sometimes the best comments on this blog come from getalife. That’s just too damned good. I can’t touch that like MC Hammer.

Ok, back to business…

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080606/aponbige/japanieaclimatechange”>TOKYO - The world needs to invest $45 trillion in energy in coming decades, build some 1,400 nuclear power plants and vastly expand wind power in order to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, according to an energy study released Friday.

Ok, two things here. All who believe the environazi liberals would allow the US to build more nuke plants raise your hands. Ain’t it funny how these same “pacifists” on the sick nazi fascist liberal left have no problem with Iran building nukes for “energy?” WTF? (Why The Fuss)

Second, all who believe that the US will not comprise the majority of those dollars, raise your hand and stick it where the sun doesn’t shine - where your diseased liberal brain is.

By getalife

June 7, 2008 11:39 AM | Link to this

The Clinton economy will always be known as the good old days.

It goes downhill from then. Gas will be 5 bucks soon and the trickle down effect destroys the economy.

So, remember the good old days when gas was cheap and they were giving away cars to come to work.

Now, they give away your jobs for slave labor.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:40 AM | Link to this

Oh and getalife…

No need to apologize for you being wrong about Hillary being our next president. I’d vote for Barack in a heartbeat if I were a Democrat.

We are all human.

By catlady

June 7, 2008 11:42 AM | Link to this

Is it better to vote for someone you aren’t SURE will mess things up (due to his inexperience) or someone who you are SURE will continue more of the same screw ups with Bush 3? Or is it better to see who the running mates for both are, since neither McCain nor Obama may make it their full term? (McCain has the age thing, Obama has the hate thing.)

I don’t think Obama can win with Clinton. Perhaps another strong woman could win back the women who are appalled that Clinton was so vilified. As for McCain, perhaps a moderate young man could swing some votes his way.

At any rate, the VP candidate needs to have significant national experience (like W did (cough, cough)) since we have decided NOW that it is important.

By Devastator

June 7, 2008 11:42 AM | Link to this

getalife,

I can understand your lack of confidence in Senators, seeing how Clinton let you down.

Now that that prediction of yours is wrong, have you decided to be wrong about McCain too?

By Cop Talk

June 7, 2008 11:43 AM | Link to this

Wooten’s got nothing. Read his article three times and look for anything that would dissuade a voter at the polls. He’s got nothing. The conservative movement’s wisdom about the State of the Union is that China and India’s demand has caused the bubble in oil prices which has temporarily slowed our growth. The conservative movement wishes it was a question of supply and Indo-Sino demand…. Oil’s surge is from the Iraq War and the global fear that is mounting daily. Bush via Cheney screwed the pooch on a scale of consequences not seen since Lucifer tried to fiddy-cent God. Cheney’s role in the ruining of America is classified, so we cant prove anything, but we can piece together enough to get Cheney behind bars, and we wont stop till we can wish him a conjugal visit.

Wooten likes to wish things too. He wishes that the 911 mastermind’s own wish to be a martyr comes true. Did anyone read that in Friday’s piece? Do you think the jihad can withstand such a devastating offensive of caveat disses and Champlain wishes?? Someone get Bin Laden on the phone and see if he wants to surrender now. Tell OBL that Wooten hopes his martyrdom happens. That one thought contains more firepower and TNT than all the bombs dropped in the last episode of Last Comic Standing. No wonder the 911 mastermind’s hair is always mussed up.

You know, I’m really thankful that Wooten is on our side.

He didn’t Trivialize 911, when a dozen or so men simply stepped on a plane. A very harmless and simple act. No ingenious bio-nuclear WMDs were used. Men stepped on a plane. Bush responded with Cheney’s Plan. Now we have history itself stuck up our patriotic patoots in a giant sucking vortex of national security excuses and war for war’s sake.

With wishes as his weapon of choice, Wooten must be using hi tech computers to run Obama’s name through biblical code machines. Obama Hussein must surely have some jihadist derivation encoded into the Koran that, when filtered through the Mayan calendar predictions and crossed referenced with Nostradumbass, must point to a secret that can get McCain elected.

But I’m sure glad Wooten is a conservative and fighting for the conservative side.

I admit, though, that it’s distressing to read a mature professional journalist write 500 words and not have one succinct syntactical second.

Bush is a good man, and a fine president, but he wasn’t a good commander in chief. He couldn’t get his general to attack the 911 conspirators in 2002. I’m sure Bush wished real hard, but firm orders were required then to win the war of 911. But what a resume Bush has, and what a record! If you go by Bush’s resume and political philosophy, we should elect him again.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:43 AM | Link to this

“…and the jobless rate at 5.5%(highest since 86)”

Interesting. How many of you diseased filth on the left realize that that same 5.5% happened under Bill Clinton?

By AMBER ALERT

June 7, 2008 11:44 AM | Link to this

LOL! Would someone please give Rufus some of the attention he so desperately desires.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:46 AM | Link to this

“(McCain has the age thing, Obama has the hate thing.)”

Bichin’ catlady, I can assure you that McCain’s wife is keeping him in good shape. Second, we are no longer living in the 1960s. If you want to talk about Obama “hate,” look toward the Clinton campaign. A lot of people mysteriously died during the Clinton years.

And that’s all I’m sayin’, sweets…

By Me

June 7, 2008 11:47 AM | Link to this

This isn’t a democracy. It’s a constitutional republic.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:49 AM | Link to this

“LOL! Would someone please give Rufus some of the attention he so desperately desires.”

That’s ok liberal coward, don’t debate me or the issue, little 5th grade school girl. Soil your britches already PoFO? Hell I’m not even warmed up yet, and I’ve got a LOT of “Rushannity” material to ramrod down your gullet, liberal.

By AMBER ALERT

June 7, 2008 11:59 AM | Link to this

Good God Rufus, what you offer here is not debate. Its a cry for help.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:00 PM | Link to this

By Me June 7, 2008 11:47 AM | Link to this “This isn’t a democracy. It’s a constitutional republic.”

Please do not confuse the disease of liberalism more than it already is.

Thank me.

No.

Thank you.

Me.

By fearless fosdik

June 7, 2008 12:05 PM | Link to this

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 11:46 AM | Link to this

RUFUS…Please, I’m very curious…Relate to us these mysterious deaths that took place during the Clinton administration.

And, don’t bother with the Vince Foster nonsense.

Look forward to all these MYSTERIOUS deaths!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:05 PM | Link to this

“Good God Rufus, what you offer here is not debate. Its a cry for help.”

So what’s your excuse, Mr./Ms. 7x10 forum vulture?

Don’t worry, you will not be able to use that little liberal pea brain of yours and attempt to discredit me here. Try as you may, whatever you say (which includes NOT debating anything about my posts themselves - AGAIN, like last weekend), you will not make me go away.

Sucks, don’t it.

By getalife

June 7, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this

Like Gore, she won the popular vote but not the election.

Like w, disaster awaits.

Both candidates suk.

By dirty harry

June 7, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this

By AMBER ALERT

June 7, 2008 11:59 AM | Link to this

Good God Rufus, what you offer here is not debate. Its a cry for help.

AMBER ALERT…For one like RUFUS you need to change your name to RED ALERT!

By Road Scholar

June 7, 2008 12:08 PM | Link to this

I’m glad you used the word arogant in your editorial. You must have learned what it means by watching the Bush Administration the past 8 years. We do not need civil liberties. We do not need an economy where most can own a home, eat a decent meal each day, and afford gas. And all of this came after he talked to who? The American People? The Democrats? I think not. And does he admit any mistakes? Lying about the war? Holding business accountable for their greedy practices?

Obama….Arogant? If so, and I do not believe so (anymore than any other politician), he is no where near the Bush regime’s levels.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:13 PM | Link to this

“RUFUS…Please, I’m very curious…Relate to us these mysterious deaths that took place during the Clinton administration.”

Fair enough.

Snopes has attempted to discredit that.

Dead is dead. And that’s all I’m sayin’.

A bloody-lipped or dress torn rape accuser notwithstanding of course - along with a semen stained blue dress that we ALL know about.

By MorningStar

June 7, 2008 12:13 PM | Link to this

“…and the jobless rate at 5.5%(highest since 86)” How many of you diseased filth on the left realize that that same 5.5% happened under Bill Clinton?

Twas below 5% for 40 consecutive months during the Clinton administration. Labor Department statistics are available for one and all to view.

By getalife June 7, 2008 11:39 AM | Link to this The Clinton economy will always be known as the good old days. It goes downhill from then. Gas will be 5 bucks soon and the trickle down effect destroys the economy.

Getalife, you’re right in that we’ll never live long enough to see gas reach $3.00 per gallon again. I hope Obama can be instrumental in getting the economy back on track. Just have to wait and see.

By Dusty

June 7, 2008 12:18 PM | Link to this

Cop Talk,11:43

So terrorists simply stepped on a plane and……you forgot to mention the rest.

Never have I heard terrorism so simplified. Nor have I heard the fight against them so vilified.

Bush has led a good fight and we continue to be safe in America. You smugly suggest that he was a “good” president. So was Jimmy Carter a “good” president. But his fight was mostly “talk” and it didn’t work. It still doesn’t but he keeps trying in bits & pieces. Bush, through our military, has kept us safe. He led us with competence and patriotic confidence.

Now, I fear war fatigue may lead some Americans to go for a pseudo good talking con man with no experience. People like you.

I vote for strength, not soothing speech. Go McCain. Continue the good work.

By getalife

June 7, 2008 12:20 PM | Link to this

Yeah, keep waiting but he voted yes on cheney’s energy bill big oil wrote and is part of the problem.

By fearless fosdik

June 7, 2008 12:21 PM | Link to this

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:13 PM | Link to this

RUFUS…Flunked your test..Didn’t you?

“Dead is dead” What does that mean Ruffy ole’ boy?

Made a statement but could not back it up with facts..Right?

Figures!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:22 PM | Link to this

U.S. Navy leaves Myanmar after junta rebuffs aid efforts

Written by Michael Casey, AP
Wednesday, 04 June 2008 BANGKOK, Thailand - U.S. Navy ships are leaving Myanmar after failing to get the junta’s permission to unload aid to “ease the suffering of hundreds of thousands” of cyclone survivors, the top U.S. military commander in the Pacific said Tuesday.

I’d just like to know two things: what in the hell were we thinking staying there so long, and what in the HELL are our tax dollars going to the UN for?

Don’t hold your breath waiting for a lib to answer those questions either.

By James

June 7, 2008 12:28 PM | Link to this

To jk:

Sir, you have trouble debating logically and missed the point. I said nothing about “what” qualifications one should have to run for President. I merely countered “Candide’s” arguement as to who had more governing, business, military experience, etc. Obama has very few qualifications. McCain has many more. So they can both run. Big deal. You decide. Do you want the freshman team or the varsity when there is a big bad team playing you that wants your blood - literraly.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:29 PM | Link to this

““Dead is dead” What does that mean Ruffy ole’ boy?”

Uhm, did you even read my Snopes link, PoFO?

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:36 PM | Link to this

Iran threatens to sue Western nations - VIENNA, Austria - Iran is threatening to sue countries that it says have damaged its reputation and pushed to have U.N. Security Council involvement in its nuclear program.

Ok President Obama, what are your plans for this situation?

(Wouldn’t you just love to ask Obama this toughassed question that the lame stream lib media wouldn’t on the campaign trail?)

By AJC/DNC Management

June 7, 2008 1:20 PM | Link to this

{{{{The former first lady’s rally will be the latest attempt to unite the Democratic Party after a divisive campaign, and follows a secret meeting with Obama on Thursday night, and speculation about her vice presidential prospects.}}}}

Yeah, right.

Brunbo’s beady eyes have shifted their hideous focus to 2012 and if DukaKerry De Wimp is in the White House her chances are nil.

The KKKlinton machine will be doing the Lord’s work this summer, turning it’s full attention to the lightweight black power activist, wretching up what ever foul information they uncover from this laugh a minute moron.

There should be plenty for them to work with.

Normal Americans that love their country will become sick and totally disgusted to learn what a hater of the greatest country on Earth DukaKerry really is.

We appreciate the help.

Question remains; will he throw hisself overboard?

“This is not the Obambi that I knew, bwa.”

By getalife

June 7, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this

Great speech, great place to have it, a historic fighter.

God bless the Clintons.

By Shop Talk

June 7, 2008 1:41 PM | Link to this

On 911, 19 men stepped on a plane. The new Pearl Harbor was not a hi-tech network of briefcase nukes or chemo-bombs or bioweapons, and a gaggle of sleeper cells, and foreign armies on the march ready to destroy Israel, or any three-headed dragon or Islamic Cyclops. It was simple men getting on simple planes.

Bush let America sleep while these men acted. There were enough warnings to have alarmed a surrender monkey, but because they originated from the Clinton Administration, they were mocked and our shields dismantled while child-napoleans planned big adventures overseas. A war that shouldn’t be there. That wasn’t in the brochure. Oil is 150 a barrel and maybe 250 a barrel because of the Iraq War. Period.

There wasn’t supposed to be a war in 2008. Lets just think about that.

I demand the resignation of George W. Bush….. You know the rest.

By JK (the regular chick)

June 7, 2008 1:41 PM | Link to this

Good afternoon. (There is another here with my initials. This is my first post here today.)

Yes, great speech by HRC! Of course, the wh0res immediately began tearing her apart. Olbermann: “She congratulated herself for six minutes and 25 seconds before mentioning Obama… [snip]… the 18 million voters AS SHE LIKES TO COUNT THEM….” and various other sneering references to what was the best, most honest, most supportive speech anyone in her position could have given. Click to CNN: “She sounds like she’s auditioning for the VP spot, doesn’t it? But was it enough?”

Click. Wh0res. How many people do YOU know who could be stabbed in the back as many times as the Clintons and still stand as tall and gracious as HRC did today? Personally, I am nowhere near that fine a person, nor do I know any myself.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 7, 2008 1:46 PM | Link to this

{{{{Sen. Bruno Klinton officially suspended her campaign in a speech today and endoresed Sen. De Wimp for president. “I endorse him and throw my full support behind him. And I ask all of you to join me in working as hard for DukaKerry as you have for me,” Bruno said to a cheering crowd in Washington.}}}}

What did I just tell you?

Do I not know it all?

She didn’t concede, she didn’t drop out, she suspended the KKKampaign which means it can be unsuspended at anytime.

What do they have on this POS anti American?

When will they drop the bomb on his lame as-s?

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 1:55 PM | Link to this

“I demand the resignation of George W. Bush….. You know the rest.”

Yawn. Like we’ve never heard that before.

Hey asshat PoFO liberal disease: if Obama wins the election (and I have faith in mainstream majority America that he won’t - the US being labeled “racist” after the smoke clears be damned), what are diseases like you on the sick left going to have left to bi-tch about? It’s in your nasty diseased blood, you know.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 1:58 PM | Link to this

“Yes, great speech by HRC! Of course, the wh0res immediately began tearing her apart. Olbermann:” - comment by (JK - the non-original)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

Now THAT is what I call entertainment. A diseased liberal trashing another diseased liberal all because of Hillary!

OMG it does not get any better than that.

Thanks for the true entertainment, asshat liberals!

By Disgusted

June 7, 2008 1:58 PM | Link to this

Click. Wh0res. How many people do YOU know who could be stabbed in the back as many times as the Clintons and still stand as tall and gracious as HRC did today? Personally, I am nowhere near that fine a person, nor do I know any myself.

So go ahead and vote for McCain, sorehead. Make sure we have a Supreme Court that turns down a woman’s pay discrimination case merely because she did not know she was being discriminated against before the statute of limitations expired. You can make sure all women take a giant step backward in rights.

And along the way, you can ensure that the economy continues on its merry decline. You and getalife disgust me. You’re like children who, not getting your way, want to take the ball home and exit from the game. I didn’t vote for Obama either, but I’m not stupid enough to believe that the election of John McCain is in any way a suitable response to my disappointment.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:04 PM | Link to this

Barack praised Hillary and McCain, Hillary didn’t praise Barack for being a media-led political sensation, historical significance of his race excluded. Oh, but we have to remember that the diseased left representation in this nation led by the likes of former liberal RAT Veep candidate Geraldine Ferraro state that Obama wouldn’t be where he was if he were white. Effing disgusting slime hypocrites, the modern left is.

By AmVet

June 7, 2008 2:09 PM | Link to this

Now THIS is the customary Jim Wooten I’ve grown to love!

Occasionally he stops these silly pretenses at being reasonable and rational.

It is always best to fall back on what has served you so well, our esteemed columnist - inane platitudes and hyperbolic rhetoric.

And your howling “faithful” are surely slobbering with delight after this return to the very far right lunatic fringe.

Where you all belong.

But guess what awaits you “conservatives” this fall?

No guesses?

C’mon now.

Yep, a second consecutive arse whuppin. (Hopefully again, of historic proportions.)

Bet on it.

And that is joyous news to the majority in this greatest of nations…

By fearless fosdik

June 7, 2008 2:10 PM | Link to this

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 12:29 PM | Link to this

YEA RUFUS I read your Snopes link, and the conclusion is exactly as I said earlier …

You flunked!

You cannot provide names of those mysterious deaths that you claimed Clinton is responsible for…NOTHING there … Except maybe for you, and the National Enquirer.

By JK (the regular chick)

June 7, 2008 2:11 PM | Link to this

Disgusted, why don’t you kiss my lilly white liberal a-s-s? Only being splattered into little pieces on 400 or being stabbed to death by a bitter Republican ex-boyfriend will stop me from voting for OBAMA in November!! I am an American first, and have been a yellow-dog Democrat my whole life. Just because YOUR KIND is showing how prejudiced YOU are this year, does not mean that I will heave my principles out the window to vote more Republiscum into office. Nor will I allow my personal feelings to keep me home on election day. In fact, as a Democrat, I will be actively campaigning for Obama and let’s not forget our state and local races, huh, Mr. OnlyMyFeelingsMatter, mmmm-kay?

I hope McCain doesn’t take the White House because people like you are getting off showing your true colors today!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:11 PM | Link to this

The left’s beloved worthless, toothless UN loves to talk about world hunger, yet during “meetings” has no problem feasting it up like the wife of Louis XVI while the rest of the world hungry eats cake. (Did we get that Myanmar issue resolved yet, UN???).

Anyway, here’s the link for glutton. Your hard earned tax dollars at work for one of the many diseased liberal left’s hero entities.

Remember, Democrats want the US to bend over for internationalism that the US supports - the lie of man-induced global warming and taxes specifically.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:19 PM | Link to this

“You cannot provide names of those mysterious deaths that you claimed Clinton is responsible for”

Liar liberal RAT, go back and re-read my post. I just said some people happened to die during Bill Clinton’s tenure. That is a F-A-C-T. I consider that mysterious, just like a lot of you disgusting pigs on the mad cow diseased left say that Bush blew up the WTC and is friends with OBL.

But go ahead, liberal RAT, if that is the only thing you have to pick out of my posts today (or last weekend for that matter), then I don’t blame you for choosing a tongue in cheek National Enquirer post.

Hook.

Line.

Sinker.

What an idiot.

By Shop Talk

June 7, 2008 2:28 PM | Link to this

McCain 08: Actually, he DOES have more vigor than a bowl of soup, but so does oregano…..

Obama 08: He’s can deliver (conservatism’s head on a platter).

Hillary 08: 16 years! 16 years! 16 years!

How old will we be at the end of Hillary’s second term? I’ll be 73. Ouch.

Scary. I can actually feel eternity. The judgement of destiny. The dissapointed angels and saddened saints. Why didn’t I become a priest? Why didn’t I buy that burial plot when it was so cheap when I saw the ad in 1978? Why didn’t I eat all my vegetables? Why didn’t I give to the Jehovah’s Witnesses that stood on my front porch over the decades? Why? WHY?

WHY?????

By doctor do right

June 7, 2008 2:29 PM | Link to this

Rufus…We all understand your pain.

A lonely man (boy) who spends all of his Saturday just typing away like a madman.

We all know you’re a social misfit, and probably spend Saturday nights playing your game station while cursing at the TV.

Take some advise from your friendly Doctor do Right and seek some help…

Medication is good for the soul!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:33 PM | Link to this

I can see it now. The liberals start crying because Ford closes plants due to SUV and truck sales decline - yes, the very same vehicles that the econazi pigassed liberals around this nation slap orange bumper stickers on, or worse, vandalized. Yes, the very same vehicles that liberals on this blog and others bich about.

MEXICO CITY, May 30 — President Felipe Calderón announced Friday that Ford will build its new fuel-efficient Fiesta “global car” in suburban Mexico City and upgrade two plants here as part of a $3 billion investment, the largest in Mexican history by a foreign manufacturer. The decision is a major setback for the United Auto Workers union, which has pushed Ford and other manufacturers to invest in U.S. plants. But it was a coup for the Mexican economy after years of losing manufacturing jobs to China and other Asian countries.

Anyone who purchased a VW Golf or Jetta made in Mexico in the last five years or so knows that a nation that can’t even keep something as primitive as water supply clean isn’t quite up to standards on building quality cars when the freaking instructions are right in front of them.

I can also see it now: “US deaths on the rise due to the popularity of the Global Car.”

By Reality Break

June 7, 2008 2:36 PM | Link to this

Poor, poor Rufus has a problem with math. You see, if both of your friends died in one year, leaving you with no friends, that could be suspicious, especially given your psychotic nature. The authorities might investigate. But if you had thousands of friends, statistics and the laws of nature would indicate that several of your friends would pass away in any given year, a certain pecentage of those in an untimely fasion. This would make you sad, but you’d go on. This is hard to understand, of course, when you only have 2.

By fearless fosdik

June 7, 2008 2:39 PM | Link to this

Rufus…A lot of people die during any one presidency you sicko…

If your point during that stupid rant was not to insinuate that somehow Clinton was involved in those deaths what was it?

So once again you flunked.

You are a failure…digest that…and start telling the truth RUFFY!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:42 PM | Link to this

Dr. No:

If you must know, I’m having my basement finished over two weekends, including this one. I like to monitor the work I’m paying for in this absolute horrendous economy you liberals incessantly b!tch about.

Plus, I’m “conserving” gas and helping to stop global warming by staying home, which is what you diseased liberals want us all to do.

Any other questions, you hypocritical liberal pig?

By AMBER ALERT

June 7, 2008 2:47 PM | Link to this

Finishing his basement. LMAO!!!

Dr Do Right, would you be Rufus’s blog buddy?

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:48 PM | Link to this

“Poor, poor Rufus has a problem with math.”

LMAO. And not one of you pigtailed liberal Marxists on the diseased left tackled my gas price post at 11:07.

That’s ok. After testing the water, I now know what’s REALLY important to you pigassed liberals on this blog.

Thanks!

Oh, and PoFo, it’s ok to use one ID.

I do.

By doctor do right

June 7, 2008 2:53 PM | Link to this

Rufus…Come clean. No need to make up little stories about a ficticious basement. We all know there are no basements in an efficiency apartment.

And, as far as conserving gas…My understanding is that Yugo’s don’t use that much fuel.

Please, now go take your medication!

By doctor do right

June 7, 2008 2:55 PM | Link to this

By AMBER ALERT

June 7, 2008 2:47 PM | Link to this

AMBER…Please be serious…The guy is pycho!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 2:58 PM | Link to this

(It doesn’t take much for the resident libs to go off the deep end, does it?!) LMAO

Democrat Senator Dick Turban, err Durbin, biched about gas prices all last week and ignored why 20% of his states gas prices are due to Illinois taxes.

Well, it appears roadkill may be next in budget cuts in Illinois. Even though this was because of budget cuts (yet another fine example of the government and taxes) I can see it now from the mind of a diseased liberal: “gee, what costs more carbon emissions - rotting animal corpses or a vehicle to driving around and picking them up?”

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:07 PM | Link to this

“Rufus…Come clean. No need to make up little stories about a ficticious basement.”

All I’ll say is that Bush’s tax stimulus check that you disgusting neo-Stalinists on the diseased left hate that I received is partially paying for it. Think what you will.

The guy is pycho

At least I can spell. But I won’t allow a piece of liberal mange like you to distract from the bigger picture here…

WASHINGTON - A Senate bill to cut greenhouse gases and address global warming is heading toward almost certain defeat after nearly a week of stalemate and partisan bickering. Each side accuses the other of obstruction, trickery and political games.

Tell ya what neo-Marxist liberals, if you think this economy is in trouble now, just implement your filthy Algore global walarmist fascism into our government.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:17 PM | Link to this

Obama for change!

Funny, that’s the same BS that Jimmuh Cartuh ran on. We all know how well THAT turned out.

What a great if not ironic youtube video.

By fearless fosdik

June 7, 2008 3:28 PM | Link to this

RUFFY..Did you hear that Jim McKay died today?

I believe there maybe a conspiracy underfoot.

But, never fear, Fearless Fosdik is near!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:28 PM | Link to this

This is actually quite a simple blog. Just post what you believe from the Right, and disgusting pigassed liberal neo-Stalinists on the diseased left will attempt to discredit you. They will not address what you have posted about. What they will do is say that everything you have posted came straight from “Rushannity”, or, just flat out attempt to call you a liar. It helps to have a backbone, which the pantywastes on the diseased left with their primitive jellyfish “brains” lack.

Anyway, moving forward…

“Multiple government and private analyses now clearly show that the bill is wrong for America,” Senator Inhofe said. “The EIA analysis projected unacceptable increases in Americans average annual household energy bills up to $325 in 2020 and $723 by 2030. And this does not factor in transportation-related costs. The EIA also found that the Lieberman-Warner bill would lead to higher coal, natural gas and petroleum prices.

“Further, EIA’s gloomy economic analysis is contingent upon the U.S. building more than 2 1/2 times as many new nuclear plants as are currently operating — an increase so massive and unrealistic as to be fictional. EIA also found Lieberman-Warner would result in up to a 9.5% drop in manufacturing output by 2030.

“Despite this gloomy EIA analysis, proponents of Lieberman-Warner are still claiming the bill will not impose economic harm to America. Only in Washington could higher energy prices be characterized as not negatively impacting the U.S. economy. If Democrats have their way, Americans will pay significantly more at the pump, in their homes, and in many cases, with their jobs, all to accomplish an undetectable impact on the climate.

“The question now is which U.S. Senator will dare to stand on the Senate Floor a month from now to vote in favor of significantly increasing the price of gas at the pump?”

Well that’s a good damned question. You think these feel good liberals who based VERY important decisions solely on how they FEEL actually helps the future of this nation?

Me neither.

By RW-(the original)

June 7, 2008 3:29 PM | Link to this

When a moonbat(ic)® makes some ridiculous statement of fact, like:

….and the jobless rate at 5.5%(highest since 86)

It’s usually a good idea to check their facts

By Heeso

June 7, 2008 3:29 PM | Link to this

Here’s HOPING Baa-baaaa’s-rocks gets nailed to the floor joists.

WASHINGTON, June 7 (UPI) — The head of U.S. mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp. allegedly approved special loans to politically connected borrowers, a report said.

Among the borrowers were two former chief executives of Fannie Mae, which is Countywide’s biggest buyer of mortgage services, including James Johnson, a close adviser to presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday.

Johnson, who is serving on a committee to help Obama pick a vice presidential running mate, served at Fannie Mae’s CEO from 1991 to 1998 and worked closely with Mozilo to streamline the credit approval process, which, the Journal reported, led to a huge boom in mortgage lending that has come crashing to an end with the current mortgage crisis.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:34 PM | Link to this

RW: please don’t post factual links here. Diseased liberals will just personally insult you and not address what you post.

By Roofus

June 7, 2008 3:41 PM | Link to this

More education for you diseased liberals: Here is the real reason McCain will be President.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:42 PM | Link to this

HARTFORD, Conn. - A 78-year-old man is tossed like a rag doll by a hit-and-run driver and lies motionless on a busy city street as car after car goes by.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Connecticut a blue state? Those OH so caring liberal dimbats. Betcha everyone that gawked around there doing nothing is a Democrat voter.

Remember, these are of the same ilk that want to disarm America and turn to the government 911 squad to protect our households. I don’t think so.

Sick.

Just sick.

By Roofus

June 7, 2008 3:49 PM | Link to this

Let me explain gas prices to you economically challenged doodie heads who think it’s all about profit.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:53 PM | Link to this

Poor PoFO, the blog isn’t all his for a change. That just sucks, don’t it? POS liberal trash.

Moving Right along…

Now this is interesting. VERY* interesting if not *VERY troublesome. There was a Youtube video of Obama talking about what he wants for America. I watched it earlier this week. Now, Youtube has yanked it. Coincidence? I don’t think so. Liberals and censorship go hand in hand.

See one of the links to the link for yourself and read all about it.

And you thought the CSS Hillary was a bad ship.

Any of you liberal Obamanians have an explanation for this?

I’m all ears.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 3:55 PM | Link to this

Huh. I give out factual gas price information, and PoFO provides us all with a cartoon link!

Man, sometimes I just don’t know how to keep up with the diseased of liberalism on this blog.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 4:06 PM | Link to this

Iran’s Mahmoud ACHKmadinejihad: DNC talking head soon to take Howard Scream’s position:

Iran expects a “different approach” from the next US president, whoever wins the November elections, President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad said in an interview published in Italy Wednesday. “Whoever wins the elections, I’m sure that the United States will change, it will have a different approach,” the Iranian leader told the Italian daily La Repubblica. The United States will have a reduced sphere of influence in the world,” he predicted, adding: “The new president will have to respond to the real demands of the American people: 40 million American citizens do not have health insurance, the victims of the New Orleans hurricane still have no homes.” In addition, the United States “will have to withdraw the soldiers from Iraq (since) the American people will not tolerate continued spending of billions of dollars on weapons,” said Ahmadenijad, in Rome to attend the UN food agency’s summit on food security. Asked whether he would negotiate with the new US leadership come January 2009, Ahmadenijad said: “It is they who cut off the links with us, hoping to suffocate us. Today Iran is an advanced country. We are ready for dialogue with anyone, except with the Zionist regime, in relations based on mutual respect and fairness.”

STRAIGHT out of a RAT’s mouth, be it on this blog or in Washington.

Remember, Obama for “change” and talking to this animal who just last week threatened to take down America.

FYI, a “different approach” here means we all bend over facing east five times a day.

By RW-(the original)

June 7, 2008 4:06 PM | Link to this

Watch Obambi when he speaks off the cuff

Have I mentioned that this guy is really a dunce?

If you only have time for one of the clips be sure to see the second.

By getalife

June 7, 2008 4:16 PM | Link to this

“On Monday, August 29, 2005, at about 6:00 a.m., Hurricane Katrina slammed into the coasts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. A category 5 hurricane until just before landfall, it was one of the worst storms ever to hit the Gulf Coast. Kathleen Blanco, the governor of Louisiana, had been briefed extensively about what to expect when the storm hit, which was why, on the Friday night before the storm reached the coast, she signed papers declaring Louisiana to be in a state of emergency. Based on what she had been told by her advisers and what she knew from being a native Louisianan, she understood that Katrina, creeping gradually toward land with sustained winds of a strength rarely seen in a hurricane, could prove to be catastrophic for Louisiana, and particularly for New Orleans.

If Bush had not seen what was taking place by Tuesday, Karl Rove had. The first evidence of Rove’s involvement in the Katrina disaster occurred on Tuesday afternoon. “Rove understood what a nightmare this was for the president,” Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana says, “so he went into high gear on the spin thing they’re so good at in the White House. Rove had David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana. I was at a press conference and David Vitter walked up to the mike and said, ‘I just got off the phone with Karl Rove.’ I looked at the governor and she looked at me, like, ‘Why is David Vitter on the phone with Karl Rove?’ I mean, he could have been talking to generals, the president himself, but Rove is just a political hatchet man.”

“I could not believe that the president of the United States, staged by Karl Rove himself, had come down to the city of New Orleans and basically put up a stage prop. It was like you had gone to a studio in California and filmed a movie. They put the props up and the minute we were gone they took them down. All the dump trucks were gone. All the Coast Guard people were gone. It was an empty spot with one little crane. It was the saddest thing I have ever seen in my life. At that moment I knew what was going on and I’ve been a changed woman ever since. It truly changed my life.”

The truth is coming out about the scum in the WH.

By @@

June 7, 2008 4:18 PM | Link to this

Many here may not consider this of any consequence but in the grand scheme….

IT IS!

Big oil goes to war with Putin.

Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev announced June 6 that he had reached an agreement with U.S. energy supermajor Chevron on the first leg of a pipeline system that has the unstated aim of diverting the majority of Kazakhstan’s oil exports away from Russia.

It is difficult to overstate the implications of such a development. Russia uses its Soviet-era petroleum transport systems to maintain a stranglehold on the economic and political life of the Central Asian states. Meaningful alternative shipping routes have so far been small in volume and long in coming.

Major coup!

Thanks Chevron.

By Roofus

June 7, 2008 4:23 PM | Link to this

More about gas prices for you fungasized ana! warts who withered your public school educated brains with the rancid aroma of those insignificant things you call facts.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 4:28 PM | Link to this

Getalife: disaster preparedness and reaction happens in this order:

Local government (New Orleans)

State government (Louisiana)

Federal government (Washington)

You can spin it six days to Sunday, but the fact is that things happen in that order and the two first responses failed to plan and failed to take action. Oh yeah, and didn’t your former governor announce not seeking re-election in 2007?

That said, I wonder, why do the people in lower Mississippi have no problems re-establishing their livelihood while those in New Orleans almost three years later still suffer?

Finally, the last time I checked, and correct me if I’m wrong, Bush isn’t running for a third term, and John McCain is NOT George W. Bush.

“FEMA issued a statement dated August 27, that President Bush authorized the allocation of federal resources, “following a review of FEMA’s analysis of the state’s request for federal assistance. A White House statement of the same date also acknowledges this authorization of aid by President Bush. On August 28, Governor Blanco sent a letter to President Bush, which increased the amount of aid requested to US $130 million.”

“On September 1, 2005, Governor Blanco authorized United States National Guard troops to “shoot and kill” rioters and looters, which followed President Bush’s statement that looters in New Orleans and elsewhere in the chaotic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina should be treated with “zero tolerance.” The attitude toward looters, and the perception that police and national guard resources were diverted to deal with looters, were sources of controversy and criticism. Governor Blanco was also criticized for allegedly having only a minor subset of her available National Guard troops standing by on ready, and for not being able to provide relief supplies and standby medical or other first responder personnel to New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin for the victims of the hurricane.”

By Roc

June 7, 2008 4:31 PM | Link to this

PLEASE STOP ENCOURAGING IGNORANT RACIST TO POST COMMENTS ATTACKING THE BLACK MAN.

ARE YOU RETARDED OR WHAT? TOO MANY RACIST WHITES THINK THAT OBAMA IS BEING SUPPORTED BECAUSE HE’S BLACK. DO WE NOT RECALL THAT JESSE JACKSON, AL SHARPTON AND CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN RAN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE? NONE OF WHICH WON THE NOMINATION. ITS ABOUT MORE THAT RACE, YOU SILLY PEOPLE.

WHAT DID THE RETARDED KID RUNNING THE COUNTRY NOW GET US WITH HIS SPARKLING RESUME? HOW ABOUT HIS FATHER WITH HIS SPARKLING RESUME?

THANK YOU! COME AGAIN!

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 4:33 PM | Link to this

LMAO! PoFO is still at it with cartoons and gas prices. Oh well, I guess he’s one of those morons trying to take a vacation to Disney and biches about paying $60 more in gas than it would have cost two years ago WHEN NANCY PELOSI & RAT CO. SAID THEY’D DO SOMETHING ABOUT GAS PRICES.

(I will continue to drive that point home until hell freezes over - or ONE liberal dimrat here owns up to Pelosi’s lie - whichever comes first).

By Shop Talk

June 7, 2008 4:44 PM | Link to this

Wooten did sew in a pretty good joke about pickup truck drivers and their owner’s contract, yesterday.

Lady Liberty, the Mother of Exiles, speaking at the wake of the recently deceased Conservatism: “Was it really a political philosophy, or was it just weak-minded selfishness born out of fear? Whenever there was an opportunity to disenfranchise my poor, tired, and huddled masses, not to mention my wretched refuse, of whom I’ve grown particularly fond, Conservatism was there. Whenever thugery and corruption was called for, Conservatism was there. Remember the Saturday Night Massacre? Conseratism! Remember the S+L crises? Conservatism! Remember the Teapot Dome Scandal…Okay, bad example, but you know what I mean!”

Mourners include Injustice, Greed, Corruption, and Waste.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this

More from the liberally corrupt UN files (again, your tax dollars hard at work at a completely worthless entity):

UN food agency chief Jacques Diouf said today that billions of dollars are being wasted on feeding obese people in the West while millions starve around the world. “No one understands… how over-consumption by obese people in the world costs $20 billion each year,” the head of the Food and Agriculture Organisation told an international summit on the food price crisis.

Hey global liberal fascist asshat: what people choose to feed THEIR kids with THEIR money is not YOUR concern. Just like I say to socialist liberal DemocRAT fascists here, it is not YOUR money to begin with, jackass.

By Rufus

June 7, 2008 4:55 PM | Link to this

Hey, let’s give the blog idiot lib parroting Improv reject PoFO a hand today, shall we?

APPLAUSE

Largely nobody’s ID has been jacked, although mine has been spoofed, if you will. Second, nobody has accused me of being RW or AJCM or any combination of accusations in between.

Now that’s what I call progress.

By Mother of Exiles

June 7, 2008 4:56 PM | Link to this

Lady Liberty, the Mother of Exiles, speaking at the wake of the recently deceased Conservatism: “Was it really a political philosophy, or was it just weak-minded selfishness born out of fear? Whenever there was an opportunity to disenfranchise my poor, tired, and huddled masses, not to mention my wretched refuse, of whom I’ve grown particularly fond, Conservatism was there. Whenever thugery and corruption was called for, Conservatism was there. Remember the Saturday Night Massacre? Conseratism! Remember the S+L crises? Conservatism! Remember the Teapot Dome Scandal…Okay, bad example, but you know what I mean!”

Mourners include Injustice, Greed, Corruption, and Waste

By AJC/DNC Management

June 7, 2008 5:03 PM | Link to this

“I honor her today for the valiant and historic campaign she has run,” he said. “She shattered barriers on behalf of my daughters and women everywhere, who now know that there are no limits to their dreams. And she inspired millions with her strength, courage and unyielding commitment to the cause of working Americans.”

No limits to your dreams, eh?

The woman trounced the dimwit radical racist Obambi the last fifteen contests, the Dhimmikkkrat National KKKomittee had to make everyone in Florida and Michigan into half voter or no voters, the pinko drive by media called the race before DukaKerry even had it won and was biased against Bruno the whole entire kkkampaign.

If your “dream” is to be a success in the democrat party as a woman, then you really are dreaming.

Dream on.

Bwa.

By Jay

June 7, 2008 5:13 PM | Link to this

Overconfident Obama supporters should understand that for every stadium packed with 80K screaming Obamaniacs, there are 20 times that many individuals who will quietly go to the polls in November and with little fanfare vote for the safe choice McCain.

By getalife

June 7, 2008 5:23 PM | Link to this

Larry Johnson warned us about the intell to occupy Iraq was bs. He was correct.

He told us the Plame outing was treason.

He was correct.

Now he tells us about a tape the gop will use after the Dem convention:

“Let me conclude with this–I think there is at least one tape/recording that will be released sometime after the August convention and is likely to be very damaging to the Barack Obama presidential campaign. While I hope that Super Delegates wake up and realize that Hillary is their best shot for victory in the fall, I realize I am swimming upstream. So word to Barrack and team–the tape is coming at some point and you folks better be ready to deal with it because, unlike the situations with Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger, you cannot divorce your wife in the middle of a campaign.”

Methinks he will be three for three.

Nope

The spineless dems will go three for three too.

Losing.

By Mother of Exiles

June 7, 2008 5:36 PM | Link to this

The Oil Bubble: New demand accounts for $75 oil. The rest is the Iraq war. The market really doesnt know what could happen, and that uncertainty created the bubble. When Obama ends that war, then oils bubble will burst and gas will be 2 bucks a gallon again.

As time passes and the America People realize what conservatives did to our great country, by inventing one phoney war, and ignoring one real war, there going to be an outcry for justice, and Cheney better have left for argentina. Move over Goebels and Eichmann, Cheney needs to play hide the meatball.

Conservatism has been reduced to drawing a moustache, beard, ogal and shumagg on Obama’s visage on campaign posters. That will be the content, platform and campaign language conservatives will use. You heard it here first.

Proof? Look at conservatism’s only campaign effort during the primaries: “Hillary sounds like my wife telling me to take out the garbage”. That’s it folks. The entire Republican effort.

Expect more of the same vs Obama. Rushannities wont be able to control themselves, and the bloggers here will all follow their lead, well, more like hack all their material, like they do 24/7 365 year in and year out.

Obama 08: He’d probably looks arab in a dishdashah, and you can expect the right to draw them on Obama campaign posters. but so would anyone look arab who wore a thoub. Except McCain, he’d look like a bozo in a gutrah, who was trying to pretend he’s Arafat in a shumagg to scare little girl scouts out of their cookies.

All the conservatives have is Obama’s name to run against him in November. Every other domestic and foreign issue they’ve lost credibility for, or they’ve corrupted and need to lay low to prevent prosectution.

Imagine Rush in a dishdashah!! (lol, that is very funny, there is milk coming out my nose:)

Now Imagine Hannity in a thoub! (Ohh, that’s even funnier! Rushannities are joining al queda cause they’re afraid of freedom, they prostituted the word when they sold it to french fries.)

Obama 08: He wont sellout freedom and trivialize the word itself by frying it in oil with potatos like the conservatives did.

It’s going to be hard to forgive conservatives for that. French fries. Wow. Were we fooled or what?

By AmVet

June 7, 2008 5:39 PM | Link to this

Senators Obama and McCain:

We were reading the other day about the tobacco legislation you both support that is making it’s way through Congress.

The bill would give the federal government the authority to regulate tobacco.

And it would ban flavored cigarettes - like strawberry and chocolate.

Flavoring makes tobacco smoke more attractive - especially to young people.

So, we agree - flavoring should be banned from cigarettes.

Here’s the curious thing, though.

Under the bill, all flavorings would be banned.

Except for menthol.

Menthol cigarettes make up fully a quarter of the more than 375 billion cigarettes consumed in the United States every year.

And 75 percent of African-Americans who smoke smoke menthol cigarettes.

We know you’ve both been busy on the campaign trail.

So, maybe you missed it last week when a bipartisan group of seven former secretaries of health sent you and other members of Congress a letter protesting the menthol loophole and demanding that menthol be banned along with all other flavorings.

Citing studies that show that an estimated 80 percent of African-American teenage smokers pick menthol brands, former health secretary Joseph Califano said that the menthol loophole was “clearly putting black children in the back of the bus.”

The letter that was sent to you says that the loophole “caves to the financial interests of tobacco companies and discriminates against African-Americans - the segment of our population at greatest risk for the killing and crippling smoking-related diseases.”

“It sends a message that African-American youngsters are valued less than white youngsters.”

Just wanted to make sure you saw this.

And the New York Times article about the letter.

We also noticed that the National African-American Tobacco Prevention Network at first supported the legislation, but now opposes it because of the lethal menthol loophole.

So, here’s to the hope that both of you will be able to make a change we can all believe in.

What say you to the youth of America?

Onward

The Nader Team

By AmVet

June 7, 2008 5:50 PM | Link to this

Jay, that is a good point.

But if you infer this is going to be a McCain cakewalk, I think you err.

This election may be another photo finish, ala the one in 2000.

Two “unusual” candidates with a zillion swing voters in the balance.

Man I love this country!

By @@

June 7, 2008 5:55 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

I think that impending video has been pretty much debunked. If anything, it’s a tape of Michelle Obama asking questions preceeded by “Why’d he” which sounds kinda like whitey.

One thing’s for sure though….those booing Obama’s name during Hillary’s exit speech?

They’ve showed up on her website.

They’re not the good little dims Obama is hoping for.

NOW’S THE TIME!!!!!!

UH OH…….

By GMAN

June 7, 2008 6:00 PM | Link to this

Mr. McGoo’s credentials… (1)crashing a plane on a carrier deck, (2) getting shot down, (3) wrestling with old men like Strom Thurmond, (4) using the f-word liberally, (5) dumping a cancer-stricken wife in favor of a rich one and committing adultery, and (6) engaging in the Keating Five scandal qualifies him to be president.

By Jackie

June 7, 2008 6:13 PM | Link to this

Early in the primary season, the Repubs were ranting about how “the liberal media was trying to force their choice on them.” They were upset because they did not think the right Repub was winning. The decided to start a campaign to support Hillary because they thought they had a chance at beating her. Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter, among others publicly proclaimed their support for a Dem because there were not sufficiently conservative Repubs. The Dems have elected their nominee and the Repubs are still squealing. I wonder if that squeal is going to be as loud in November as it is now?

By AJC/DNC Management

June 8, 2008 8:04 AM | Link to this

Is the top of the front page picture of DukaKerry De Wimp not reminiscent of the photos the Nazis used to parade around of Hitler, so the kult could prostrate themselves in awe of the man?

This is scary.

And since dimwit Obambi gushed that America doesn’t treat it’s sick people, the Urinal/DNC dutifully cobbles together some propaganda to cover for their moron’s gaffe:

Patients in peril often get no help-Urinal/PMS

Can you say in the bag?

A major Obama adviser is convicted of bribery, and the media shrugs. I wonder what the coverage would have been like had it been a Republican or Hillary.-Urinal/DNC Vent

Heh, word^^.

The short version of the Democratic Party primary campaign is that the media fell in love with Barack Obama but the Democratic electorate declined to.

Out there in the voting booths, however, Democrat legs stayed admirably unthrilled. The more the media told Hillary she was toast, and she should get the hell out of it and let Obama romp to victory, the more Democrats insisted on voting for her. The more the media insisted Barack was inevitable, the less inclined the voters were to get with the program. On the strength of Chris Matthews’ vibrating calves, Sen. Obama raised a ton of money – over $300 million – and massively outspent Sen. Clinton, but he didn’t really get any bang for his buck. In the end, he crawled over the finish line. The Obama Express came a-hurtlin’ down the track at 2 miles an hour.

~~~~~~

Sen. Hillary Clinton, the most successful female presidential candidate in U.S. history, officially ended her campaign Saturday with a forceful promise to help elect Sen. Barack Obama —- and the declaration that, even though she had failed to “shatter that highest, hardest glass ceiling,” a gender barrier had been crossed.-Urinal/DNC

Some could say she even won it, hahaha.

But instead she gets the booby prize.

A bunch a gaseous mindless platitudes across thee pages of the pinko media, your efforts have been duly noted Bruno, now GTF away.

And doesn’t it sum up liberalism in nutshell, pinko’s consider it a success not when you are actually successful but instead if you are the right color or gender, or you say the things that the dhimmokrats want to hear.

That is why liberals want to cripple the economy, they don’t care if we are a successful, prosperous country, they just want to be liked by doing what the world tells them to do, no matter the consequences.

Winning to them is not the goal, winning is mean, they would rather be losers groveling before the court of world opinion so that everybody is “happy.”

I pray for you America.

~~~~~

Given all that, it’s incredibly backward-looking to believe there should be race-based remedies for the problems facing the most beleaguered black Americans, those languishing in prisons or crime-infested public housing, those who are drug-addicted, illiterate and unemployed. Now, it’s absolutely true that black folks are disproportionately afflicted by a host of ills, from poor health to poor educational attainment, because of the legacy of discrimination. Oppressed, shut out and segregated for centuries, black Americans were given the worst schools, the worst medical care, the worst housing, the worst neighborhoods.-Queen Pinko, Urinal/PMS

How do you like that, the dhimmokrats and their welfare programs, teacher’s unions and inability to see beyond the victim culture are solely responsible for the plight of blacks, but yet the balme you, the typical American racist for their failures.

These kandy as-s mealy mouthed liberals have had control of the government for the better part of the last century and all they have been able to accomplish with their beloved government is to marginalize and mire blacks in deep, ruinous poverty.

Maybe government isn’t the solution, gosh, where have I heard that before?

~~~~~

Democrats are not being blamed for causing the price of gasoline to reach $4 a gallon, at least by the public and at least for now. Where Democrats have stumbled embarrassingly is in their campaign to persuade the public that the American oil industry is the chief culprit. A Gallup national poll in May found only 20 percent blame the oil companies for gouging, down from 34 percent a year ago. Where Republicans have succeeded is in selling their solution to soaring gas prices: drilling for oil offshore and on federal lands, areas now off limits. In the Gallup survey, support for drilling in precisely these areas jumped from 41 percent in 2007 to 57 percent in May.

Just think of the long, never ending idiocy of the left’s lying propaganda kkkampaign against domestic energy production and as soon as Republicans inform the public of the truth, their opinion swings immediately to the opposite of what the environmental terrorists want to do.

Is this not proof positive that we need to get all of our message out? Why are we still cowering before the dimwits?

I’m sorry, why are you still cowering before the dimwits?

~~~~~~

Every one knows the standard operating procedure for a communist dictatorship is to blame your country’s failures on some outside force or boogeyman, this being total propaganda to make your enslaved citizenry belief that you have their best interests in mind, is this not how the dhimmokrat party acts most of the time?

New Russian president blames America for economic troubles-Urinal/PMS

Hey! We hate America too!

The enemy: America. The savior: the dhimmokrat party.

Great.

~~~~~

Another dhimmokrat lead government passes it’s incompetence along to We the People:

DEKALB COUNTY: Taxes likely to increase-Urinal/DNC

Hmmm, property values are “plummeting,” according to the drive by media, but yet property taxes still increase.

Sweet.

You didn’t think the libs in government were going to cut back, did you?

They’ll tell you to use less, they’ll tell you to do without, when do you reckon they will ever start “conserving?”

By sin bad

June 8, 2008 8:57 AM | Link to this

Obama is more frightening than that dude with the hockey mask.

A freak of nature.

Take a look at Atlanta or Chicago for a dose of “liberal” governance.

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 9:06 AM | Link to this

George Wills thinks Obama’s first test as president (thank you) is whether he’ll pick Hillary 4 VP. He’s agin it.

Obama, pick Hillary. The conservatives are obviously afraid of the ticket. They’re hoping real hard that Hillary’s 18 million votes get divided.

Obama/Hillary could get 50 million votes in November in the most ostentatios display of voter nullification of evil in the history of polling.

Conservatism is the great satan. It’s pure evil. It lives on lies and misdirection. It grows on the ignorance of a population. Conservatism is the polar opposite of heaven. Heaven being where all are equal and non dispossessed or diminished because of birthright or fraud. Conservatism is nepotism, cronyism, and arbitrary war. Should one man own magnetism or electricity or wind? Should one man own water or food? That’s conservatism, my friend. And it needs to be squashed, like the cockroach on the soup-kitchen floor, once and for all.

Obama 08: No, no, he’s not a conservative. He’s an American.

Take heart, Americans, justice is only a voter ID away.

By sin bad

June 8, 2008 9:50 AM | Link to this

obama/hillary

a nation divided.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 8, 2008 10:00 AM | Link to this

Should one man own water or food? That’s conservatism, my friend. And it needs to be squashed, like the cockroach on the soup-kitchen floor, once and for all.

We will all get to know about cockroaches on the soup kitchen floor if we elect DukaKerry De Wimp.

Atlanta, long time experimental guinea pig of the left, is a total failure, only after three years of incompetence will they perform “brain surgery” on their massive budget defecits, need we any more proof of the harm that would befall the entire country?

I pray for you America.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 10:19 AM | Link to this

Obama/Hillary could get 50 million votes in November

Considering that Kerry got 59 million votes and still lost by 3 million or so I’m pretty sure McCain would be thrilled with his opponents only getting 50 million.

By Elrado Ramsay

June 8, 2008 10:22 AM | Link to this

Anything that frightens a washed up right wing propagandist like Jim Wooten is a friend of mine.

Wooten should preach his anti-liberal pablum to my nineteen year old daughter who wonder if she will be able to afford graduate school, or be able to find a job that will have health care benefits, or how many more pictures of cherub faced nineteen year olds she will understand to have passed away in Iraq.

Wooten is part of the gentrification of racism and sexism in this country. he is voice to all the bigots and Jim Crowists who believe that Obama is the end of America. He refuses to use his brain instead of the party line. I am elated that, finally, Democrats have an octogenerian irrelevance like Wooten on the run.

Elrado

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 10:22 AM | Link to this

Let me tell you all a little story about conservatism. We go to 1904. The Wright Brothers invented the airplane. They went to sell their idea, and nobody would buy it. Instead, Alexander Graham Bell, saw that he could steal the idea. He said, “you could put a powerful enough engine on a picnic table and it would fly.”

Bell, with his army of lawyers, would not allow the Wright Bro’s patent to stop his conspired infringement. The Wright Brothers never profited. They spent years trying to stop knock offs in court, and squandered all the opportunities that should have gone to the inventors of flight. Bell stole the designs and the entire enterprise in conspiracy with a motor manufacturer named Curtis..

Same with TV. A farmer invented Television, but CBS stole the typewriter-effect gizmo that made it work, and refused to pay the farmer a penny, until he sued in court and eventually got a pittance of what it was worth. ( I still want to know how that farmer could rely on his invention to go one line at a time from the top left to right and then down one line from left to right and then down one line etc, until an entire CRT was filled forming the TV picture we saw back then. Is there something about matter itself that makes it conform to that effect? I will learn how this gizmo works. I want to steal television. I am a conservative).

That’s conservatism. That’s what needs to be squashed forever. They want their monopoly when it benefits them, otherwise, they’re communists who insist everyone should share ideas and technology, patents and industry. (Until they can lock it up for themselves, then they imprison those who would infringe their stolen patents).

That’s conservatism. Pure evil. Selfish greed and stolen monopoly. Why do you think we made laws against it?

Obama 08: Justice, for the first time, Justice.

By sin bad

June 8, 2008 10:32 AM | Link to this

Yea, I bet you invented fire as well, hmmm Exl….

Please elaborate.

Justice my a*.

By TW

June 8, 2008 10:37 AM | Link to this

The problem with McSame’s ‘experience’ is the blood red F he gets for Iraq. Giving ‘w’ the authority to ‘play war’ was tantamount to giving a loaded gun to a two-year-old.

Sorry, John, you’re fired. Had you made such an error in judgement while on the board of any private company you’d have been fired on the spot.

By D

June 8, 2008 10:48 AM | Link to this

Well, let’s look at total years in elected office, Sen. Obama has GWB beat out if you look back at 2000. GWB’s first elected office was that of governor of Texas which he held for 5 years, between state senate and US Senate, Sen Obama has been in elected office for 10 years. That aside, I am still not convinced that either of the Senators running for president should win. Why have, for the last three elections, both parties given us a “lesser of the two evils” to choose from?

As far as Sen. Obama’s votes against Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, both men are undoubtedly qualified, but if Sen. Obama felt, as I do, that they would vote too often too far to the right, then he was justified. I consider myself a very centrist individual, but I don’t want to see us move backwards, and that is what has happened since the appointment of these two individuals to the Supreme Court.

Finally, something I want to point out about the difference between conservatives and liberals, and I am sure Mr. Wooten would agree. If it were for the conservatives, we would be singing “God Save The Queen” prior to every baseball game. Liberalism is nothing to fear in moderation, the same goes for conservatism. There just needs to be a balance.

By D

June 8, 2008 10:50 AM | Link to this

Well, let’s look at total years in elected office, Sen. Obama has GWB beat out if you look back at 2000. GWB’s first elected office was that of governor of Texas which he held for 5 years, between state senate and US Senate, Sen Obama has been in elected office for 10 years. That aside, I am still not convinced that either of the Senators running for president should win. Why have, for the last three elections, both parties given us a “lesser of the two evils” to choose from?

As far as Sen. Obama’s votes against Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, both men are undoubtedly qualified, but if Sen. Obama felt, as I do, that they would vote too often too far to the right, then he was justified. I consider myself a very centrist individual, but I don’t want to see us move backwards, and that is what has happened since the appointment of these two individuals to the Supreme Court.

Finally, something I want to point out about the difference between conservatives and liberals, and I am sure Mr. Wooten would agree. If it were for the conservatives, we would be singing “God Save The Queen” prior to every baseball game. Liberalism is nothing to fear in moderation, the same goes for conservatism. There just needs to be a balance.

By D

June 8, 2008 10:51 AM | Link to this

Well, let’s look at total years in elected office, Sen. Obama has GWB beat out if you look back at 2000. GWB’s first elected office was that of governor of Texas which he held for 5 years, between state senate and US Senate, Sen Obama has been in elected office for 10 years. That aside, I am still not convinced that either of the Senators running for president should win. Why have, for the last three elections, both parties given us a “lesser of the two evils” to choose from?

As far as Sen. Obama’s votes against Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, both men are undoubtedly qualified, but if Sen. Obama felt, as I do, that they would vote too often too far to the right, then he was justified. I consider myself a very centrist individual, but I don’t want to see us move backwards, and that is what has happened since the appointment of these two individuals to the Supreme Court.

Finally, something I want to point out about the difference between conservatives and liberals, and I am sure Mr. Wooten would agree. If it were for the conservatives, we would be singing “God Save The Queen” prior to every baseball game. Liberalism is nothing to fear in moderation, the same goes for conservatism. There just needs to be a balance.

By sin bad

June 8, 2008 11:01 AM | Link to this

Sen. Obama…

Do you really want this guy appointing Supreme Court justices?

D- I prefer baseball over cricket.

Vote for reality in ‘08 : McCain

Its better than nuthin’

By ANS

June 8, 2008 11:23 AM | Link to this

Americans for Natural Selection formally endorses John McCain. While the ANS commends George W. Bush for taking this country in a direction that rids itself of dead weight, there is much work left.

The ANS believes a country is only as strong as its weakest link. We are advocates of eliminating this link. By effectively serving Bush’s third term, John McCain will continue policies that choke out the poor and cripple the members of the middle class who would not make it anyway.

By Jackie

June 8, 2008 12:16 PM | Link to this

Sen. Barack Obama: President of Harvard Law Review

Constitutional Law Professor @ University of Chicago, one of the preeminent law schools in the country.

The current crop of Supreme Court justices have help in the removal/diminishing the 1st, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments of the Constitution; selected George W. Bush as President, overriding the Florida Supreme Court on a state issue of election; expanded eminent domain, confiscation of personal property.

Where does the list end? Yet, there are those who would rather shoot themselves i the foot to bolster their point at the expense of everyone else. Isn’t this attitude that allowed the current regime to terrorize the citizenry?

I know, it is the liberal media’s fault for not asking the right question of the right person(s) as to why we are in this situation!

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 12:36 PM | Link to this

Jackie,

The Kelo vs New London decision, that you must be using in your argument that the “current” court expanded eminent domain, was 5-4 and the four dissenters were Sandra Day O’Conner, William Rehnquist, Clarence Thomas, and Antonin Scalia.

If the expansion of eminent domain is your beef it sounds like you need to have more conservative justices.

By TW

June 8, 2008 12:45 PM | Link to this

Jackie - great post. What you must understand is the foundation of insecurity upon which the righwing currently teeters. Following the civil rights movement, those who had felt entitled merely altered their approach. At the core of their being is the need to look down upon and it has nothing to do with right or wrong. All they have to do is win - your appeal for the well being of the country is really of no concern to them (how could it be? - look at the results). They must perceive themselves as better than, lest they melt.

In the last eight years they have screwed us in ways we have yet to feel. Come November, the core of this virus will board its yacht and head for the island they’ve just bought, collectively giving this place the finger. After all, in their eyes, it went bottoms up with the civil rights movement. Equality is for losers, Jackie.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 8, 2008 12:52 PM | Link to this

Huh, no gaffes from Der Fuerher this morning, I guess he hasn’t been speaking, eh?

By getalife

June 8, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this

Yeah Andy.

Nothing from McCain today but he is trying to make Iraq the number one issue because w will declare victory again to help McCain.

Its the ecomomy that w and McCain are both stupid.

Obama voted yes on cheney’s big oil bill so he is to blame for the gas prices. No solutions, just kool aid.

Like I said, both parties suk and both candidates suk.

After the disrespect of the Clintons, I have never been prouder to be Independent.

Blindly supporting the corrupt parties is insane.

Blindly trusting these parties after what they have done to our country is ignorant.

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 1:07 PM | Link to this

Well, let’s see how this works out if we follow the rules of liberal propaganda.

If liberals get “older”(and they will!!), we should call them a bowl of soup, demented, Gramps and “Sleepy”.

If liberals are involved in an accident, it is THEIR fault without a doubt ‘specially if they are flying planes in the military.

If liberals get shot, it is THEIR fault ‘specially if it happened in military action.

If the marriage of a lib doesn’t work, it is HIS fault.

If a liberal serves in the USA Congress where there is a known bigot, it is HIS fault that Congress has a bigot.

If a liberal is in a group of Senators at an unauthorized meeting, that liberal is GUILTY even if the investigator CLEARS that liberal of wrongdoing.

Liberals should never let themselves become POWs and get tortured. It they do, it is THEIR fault.

If liberals develop skin cancer, it is THEIR fault.

On the other hand,

If liberal Democrats nominate a candidate closely associated with others well known for rabid antiAmerican sentiments,IT IS THEIR fault. They nominated Obama.

DOWN with the rules of Democratic propaganda. Go for the all American guy, John McCain.

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 1:14 PM | Link to this

TW@12:45

You posted Equality is for losers. What does that make you? A LOSER for equality or a discriminating BIGOT?

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 1:20 PM | Link to this

Do you think Gaffe Master Dunce knows the things you can find on his own campaign website?

In other words, “Jews stick together.” Americans must know how extremely powerful the Jewish Lobby is and how it operates to undermine America’s interests both at home and abroad. At home - by corrupting America’s political system, and abroad - by dictating American Foreign Policy against America’s best interests.

This blog is for those interested in learning how can we change this country from the current capitalist unfair system, into a real socialist, democratic system for all. This capitalist system of Bush and his cronies only benefit the upper classes. USA needs a 21st Century Socialist, Democratic and Participative system for the workers and people of this country, without fascism, without wars, but with peace, equality, socialism and love

By Jay

June 8, 2008 1:21 PM | Link to this

As a Republican I feel funny admitting this, but I was pulling for Hillary to beat Obama the last few months. Biggest reason is that it was obvious the news media is in love with Obama and slanted positive coverage to him and negative to Hillary. We’ve been putting up with that crap for decades on my side. On the upside, going forward I think most rational Americans are getting enough of the “Obama is the Messiah” message being crammed down their throats by the media. Overexposure is just as bad for a candidate as underexposure.

By TW

June 8, 2008 1:24 PM | Link to this

Dusty - you wear the sheeps ignorance so well. How’s the GED coming along?

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 1:34 PM | Link to this

TW,@1:24

You didn’t answer the question I asked@ 1:14 about your post but you did give us a conclusion. You are a LOSER!

By TW

June 8, 2008 1:44 PM | Link to this

Dusty - I’ll take your reply to mean the GED is causing you fits. Hang in there! As you become more educated, your need to name call will diminish.

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 1:46 PM | Link to this

Wait a minute, Dusty, you forgot to call me a loser too.

Hey, Hillary basically admitted John Lennon was right: “Women are the N-word of the world” (I’ll say it again) “Women are the N-word of the world”. (IdontbelieveinBEATLES).

John L.was out of control, back then. Are you ready for this? I was saving up for his Mind Games album, and he’s disavowing every convention I was raised on, I’m trying to complete my music collection and he’s worshipping satan. He was out of CONTROL! Are you ready for this? Out of CONTROL!

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 1:52 PM | Link to this

RW-(the original)@1:20

That second paragraph you copied for us mentioned peace, equality, socialism and love.

I thought all that hippie kind of wording went out when the drug era diminished. Was that when Obama was trying out the drugs he mentioned? Sounds like Dems are digging up the old slogans of that time.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 8, 2008 1:56 PM | Link to this

Aahhh, yes, down the road of ruin we ride:

Do you see this picture of children so strongly cheering their leader, Adolph Hitler? How did Hitler control these young people? Could this happen again today? If we learn how Hitler was able to control his youth, then perhaps we can help to prevent a repeat of such Nazi-style mind-control brainwashing in the future.

Germany, of course, rose from the ashes of World War I, (“The War to End All Wars”), as both a democracy and a country that was heavily in debt. Inflation was rampant. Social problems were also rampant. Hitler promised to fix his Germany and restore the “respect” that many Germans thought was so unjustly taken from them by the Armistice marking the end of World War I.

How Did Hitler Control His Youth

Hitler used his image as a father figure

Hitler extinguished dissent

Hitler made certain that children were kept as ignorant as possible

Hitler gathered the children into frequent rallies

Hitler used the Jews as a focus of blame

Hitler believed that having too much money was a real problem for children

Hitler used a propaganda program

Hitler wrote books and other propaganda materials to promote his views

Sieg Heil, you stupid mofos.

By For the Record ...

June 8, 2008 1:56 PM | Link to this

So RW, do you and your fellow giant intellects (Sean, Michelle, Rush, DeLay) think you can win in November by ignoring the issues and slandering Obama by guilt through association?

Do you believe that once women find out that McCain is anti-Roe, against equal pay for equal work, and whose health care plan will reduce coverage for children, that they will vote for him because of Bill Ayers?

Are you throwing in with the lowlife sleaze and trash on your end of the political spectrum? Or do you prefer an honest debate on the issues?

Just checking …

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this

TW, I used your posted words so you are doing the name calling, loser.

Oh and thank you for asking. My university degree and other professional certifications are quite in order. Now, no more name calling, loser (your words).

Mother of Exiles aka PoFo aka Loser@1:46

You are so clever but I don’t have the faintest notion what the “N-word of the world” is. Nor am I interested. Aren’t most of the ‘Beatles’ dead? How OLD are you?

By AJC/DNC Management

June 8, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this

James Warren “Jim” Jones (May 13, 1931 – November 18, 1978) was the American founder of the Peoples Temple, which became synonymous with group suicide after the November 18, 1978 death of over 900 people from cyanide poisoning in their isolated agricultural intentional community called Jonestown,

In 1951, Jones began attending communist meetings and rallies in Indianapolis.[4] Jones became flustered at harassment he received during the McCarthy Hearings,[4] particularly, regarding meetings between Jones and his mother with Paul Robeson.[5] This, among other things, provoked a seminal moment for Jones where he asked himself “how can I demonstrate my Marxism?

Jones purported to preach what he called “apostolic socialism.”[8] In doing so, the Temple openly preached to established members that “religion is an opiate of the people.”[9] Accordingly, “those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be brought to enlightenment — socialism.”[10] In that regard, Jones also openly stated that he “took the church and used the church to bring people to atheism.” [11] Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that “If you’re born in this church, this socialist revolution, you’re not born into sin. If you’re born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you’re born in sin. But if you’re born in socialism, you’re not born in sin.”[9]

Members of Jones’ church called him “Father” and believed their movement was the solution to the problems of society; many did not distinguish Jones from the movement. Since the Peoples Temple participation was instrumental in the mayoral election victory of George Moscone in 1975, Moscone appointed Jones as the Chairman of the San Francisco Housing Commission.[13]

Unlike most other figures deemed as cult leaders, Jones enjoyed public support and contact with some of the highest level politicians in the United States. For example, in the heat of the 1976 presidential campaign, Jones met with vice presidential candidate Walter Mondale on his campaign plane.[14] Likewise, First Lady Rosalynn Carter personally met Jones for a private dinner at the Stanford Court Hotel.[14] Mrs. Carter later called Jones personally.[15] At the 1976 grand opening of the San Francisco Democratic Party Headquarters, Jones packed the audience with Temple members and garnered louder applause when he spoke than Mrs. Carter.[16]

At that dinner, while introducing Jones, Willie Brown stated “Let me present to you what you should see every day when you look in the mirror in the early morning hours … Let me present to you a combination of Martin King, Angela Davis, Albert Einstein … Chairman Mao.”[18] Introducing Jones at another dinner, Brown referred to him as “a young man came upon the scene, became an inspiration for a whole lot of people. He’s done fantastic things.”

Following a visit to the Peoples Temple, Harvey Milk wrote to Jones: “Rev Jim, It may take me many a day to come back down from the high that I reach today. I found something dear today. I found a sense of being that makes up for all the hours and energy placed in a fight. I found what you wanted me to find. I shall be back. For I can never leave.”[21]

“When somebody like Jim Jones comes on the scene, that absolutely scares the hell out of most everybody occupying positions of power in the system.”[23] Harvey Milk wrote Jones a handwritten note stating “my name is cut into stone in support of you - and your people.”[24] Most imporantly for Jones and the Temple, Moscone’s office shortly thereafter issued a press release saying that Jones had broken no laws. [24]

Sieg Heil, you stupid mofos.

By TW

June 8, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this

Speaking of drugs, one must wonder if McSame’s persuit of the White House is a good thing for Cindy’s sobriety. After all, if the Keating Five Scandal sent her into the opiates, invading Iran might prove a little much.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this

FtR,

I’ve made two comments today. One was pointing out what a dimwit Jackie is and the other was directly taken from Obambi’s web site. Neither mentioned Bill Ayers and only one had any slight connection to this election.

Would you care to share those mushrooms or are you being a typical liberal and hoarding them for yourselves?

Just checking…

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 2:11 PM | Link to this

Wooten writes that america has moved beyond the bill and hill saga. lol. The conservatives invented the saga, and it has as much credibility as Bush knew about 911 on 910.

Yes, the left was truthful when they said Iraq was an unjustified, unnecessary, distracting war from the real war in afghanistan. The right will use the truth of the left, and copy the resultant gems of beautiful logic they employed to destroy conservatism’s credibility. However there’s a diff.

Conservative’s style over substance will play out as groups of armed men roving around subdivisions in the wee hours defacing Obama campaign posters. They’ll draw in Arab garb, beards, etc. Real mature. But it’s the only hand conservatism has left.

Will American’s fall for it? They fell for WMDs didn’t they? They fell for Kerry’s Nam record smear vs Bush’s desertion coverup. They fell for the Supreme Court coup in 2000.

With some gullible voters, a hitler moustache is worth a thousand flip flops and two thousand burning draft cards!!!

Dont forget to say, “support the troops” or they’ll think you’re Osama Bin Laden himself!!! (I made a funny, LOL, I have goat milk coming out my nose! OMG! That means I’m a sleeper cell!)

The right will have a supernova of illogical hysterical nonsense as they implode on themselves and spend the last of their credibility for many adminstrations to come.

Thank you, ma’ams.

By Scoreboard

June 8, 2008 2:27 PM | Link to this

Wow. It sure is hot today.

I guess this is what you would call your typical global warming heat wave.

This is shaping up to be the hottest June on record.

By Jackie

June 8, 2008 2:28 PM | Link to this

@RW(the original)

You will acknowledge that the majority of current and recent past Supreme Court nominees were those nominated by the Repubs. Given that fact, the Repubs agenda is in full force, ostensibly, responsible for the decisions being rendered.

Do I have that wrong?

By Ja

June 8, 2008 2:33 PM | Link to this

@RW(the original)

I forgot to add to that list of endangered Constitutional erosions, the 2nd Admendment. As you well know, it is the right to bear arms in a well regulated militia.

Secondly, you hid the fact that you pointed out what a dimwit you proved me to be. I ask you, with all deference, what evidence did you use to point out the fallacy of my thesis?

I do appreciate your reading my post, but, feel aggrieved that you do not have the ability to read and comprehend what I said relative to public facts.

By dusty

June 8, 2008 2:40 PM | Link to this

Oh, the preacher was at his best today…a sermon of the godliness of our wonderful leader George W. Bush, and the protection he has afforded the U.S.A…Praise Jesus and GWB!

The potluck that followed was well attended, and, I must say the dish I provided was scrumptious!

Have to run now, and for all you haters of our wonderful leader and his vast accomplishments all I can say is FOOEY!

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 2:45 PM | Link to this

CNN just reported that Big Brown was shot to death after losing the Belmont, not for coming up lame, but for being a poosie.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 8, 2008 2:45 PM | Link to this

Over the past year, a growing number of very consequential figures in the jihadist movement have publicly and vociferously repudiated Osama Bin Laden. And that is costing Al Qaeda the hearts and minds of many of those radical-leaning Muslims who might otherwise sympathize with the terrorists.

The reason: Al Qaeda has gone too far even for many jihadists to stomach. They are horrified by Al Qaeda’s brutal campaign in Iraq, by the reality that most of Al Qaeda’s victims around the world are Muslim and by the fact that the terror network has continued to target civilians for slaughter in the West.

But the surrender monkey left still loves him and fervently wishes he would blow up some more people in Iraq so that they can beat Geroge Bush about the head with their goony propaganda.

The libs are really sick, you know it?

Recent polls show that Al Qaeda has hemorrhaged support in places where its terrorist campaign has reached people’s doorsteps. By one measure, pro-Al Qaeda sentiment is now down to 10% in Saudi Arabia - and has dropped from 70% to 4% in the Northwest Frontier Province of Pakistan. The number of Al Qaeda sympathizers in Britain fell dramatically after the 2005 London bombings.

Can you say victory?

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 2:48 PM | Link to this

Jackie,

If you want to blame Republicanism for some of the liberal justices on the court just because they were put their by Republican Presidents with liberal Democrat Senates then so be it, but that’s a rather absurd way to look at things.

The liberal justices are the ones that expanded eminent domain and the conservative justices were on your side.

What your argument leads you to sounds more like one that I would make in that the only logical conclusion to get where you want to is to have a conservative Republican President and a conservative Republican Senate with a fairly large majority.

By MorningStar

June 8, 2008 2:52 PM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) June 7, 2008 3:29 PM When a moonbat(ic)® makes some ridiculous statement of fact, like:

….and the jobless rate at 5.5%(highest since 86 It’s usually a good idea to check their facts

Ah..hemmm. Methinks you probably noticed the link provided rate through APRIL 2008. The 5.5 percentage rate if you will check, was provided by USDOL Bureau of Labor Statistics per various news sites.

((MSNBC, Fri. 6, 2008- Washington-The nation’s unemployment rate jumped to 5.5 percent in May - the biggest monthly rise since 1986-as nervous employers cut 49,000 jobs)). Check various newspapers, even the AJC.

I would encourage you to again check the Bureau of Labor Statistics Home page.

On another note, ((gasoline prices now average $4.00 per gallon, and expected to keep climbing)).

((Foreclosure surge to record high))

Too bad. No jobs, no money for gasoline or house payment. Sumpin’s gotta give.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 3:01 PM | Link to this

the 2nd Admendment. As you well know, it is the right to bear arms in a well regulated militia.

What?

Jackie,

Have you ever even read the Constitution? That’s bass ackwards of what the second amendment says and there is only now a case in front of the court to define that more clearly.

By Jackie

June 8, 2008 3:01 PM | Link to this

@RW(the original)

Are you saying the majority of the justices on the Supreme Court are liberal?

Please point out those justices, as I do not believe there are any liberals remaining on the court, only moderates, conservatives and far-right wingers.

As for nomination and confirmation, it still boils down to who gets nominated and confirmed. As I see it, there are 7 Repubs on the current court. What count do you come up with?

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 3:11 PM | Link to this

dusty @2:40 (probably PoFo AGAIN)

Just the same ID stealer who has nothing to say for himself. Have fun. Anythng else you want to say using my ID?

Well, I see our liberal LOSER TW @2:08 has decided to pick on the women since he is afraid to pick on men.

Yeah, let’s propagandize McCain’s wife ‘cause he’s a hero and libs don’t like heroes. Besides, Mrs. McCain is a very good looking lady and rich and those are not the usual traits of liberal women.

AND..does anyone want to mention the charming anti-American wife of Obama who has finally found one thing in America she likes. (I’m guessing it was the White House.) Oh well, TW probably likes her because he feels the same way about America. Haven’t heard him mention anything he likes. Poor baby..hang in there.

By MorningStar

June 8, 2008 3:12 PM | Link to this

By dusty June 8, 2008 2:40 PM Oh, the preacher was at his best today…a sermon of the godliness of our wonderful leader George W. Bush, and the protection he has afforded the U.S.A…Praise Jesus and GWB!

POLITICS FROM THE PULPIT????? Never! Praying for our leaders? YES. But no ‘political stuff.’

The potluck that followed was well attended, and, I must say the dish I provided was scrumptious!

Hummmmmmm

By Me

June 8, 2008 3:18 PM | Link to this

After reading alot of these posts I’ve come to the conclusion we need to spend a lot more money on mental hospitals.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 3:29 PM | Link to this

Jackie,

If you think Ruth Bader Ginsberg is a moderate, a conservative, or a far right winger then we probably have no middle ground for a rational discussion. Same goes for John Paul Stevens and yes I realize he was nominated by the only man to have held both the office of Vice President and the office of President without ever being elected to either.

I think I’ll get back to working in my yard. Have a pleasant rest of your Sunday.

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 3:30 PM | Link to this

MorningStar@3:12

Are thee a bit slow today? You are quoting something my ID stealer posted AS I JUST MENTIONED.

I hope you are not PoFo who needs a wind chime, a baby rattle or a litter box to keep him out of trouble.

By AJC Hall Monitor

June 8, 2008 3:31 PM | Link to this

Me, at 3:18PM. They have access to meds! They just refuse to take them timely!!! What’s a monitor to do?

By getalife

June 8, 2008 3:33 PM | Link to this

Me too.

Our country is whacked out on drugs.

Gullible fools thinking their party can fix a broken government they broke.

It is insane.

By MorningStar

June 8, 2008 3:40 PM | Link to this

By Dusty June 8, 2008 3:30 PM MorningStar@3:12 Are thee a bit slow today? You are quoting something my ID stealer posted AS I JUST MENTIONED.

Good afternoon Dusty. I hope I no more slower than usual. My apologies about the 3:12PM. I did not realize someone grabbed your ID. Hope you have a pleasant evening.

By Dusty

June 8, 2008 3:59 PM | Link to this

Morningstar@3:40

It’s OK. Hard to keep up with loony ID Stealers. Maybe it’s the heat.

And speaking of heat…yesterday I went to the PDA airshow which was great with vintage planes looping and smoking and flying formations. But that asphalt must have been 120 degrees and not a tree within a mile. Lotsa hot fun though. Amazing planes and pilots.

Now I leave to fill the bird bath, the feeder and pick blueberries. See ya later.(Keep track of those ID thieves for me.)

By Dr. Fed Up

June 8, 2008 4:06 PM | Link to this

The vast assortment of half-baked non-truths and ad hominem attacks contained in this pointless thread are exactly why this state is percieved as a foul, stinking backwater of Bush worshiping inbred, redneck retards and a gross national embarrassment. Do the Nation a favour and secede, please. Sherman apparently left far too much of this place standing on his way to the sea. Get me outta here…

By Obambi

June 8, 2008 4:23 PM | Link to this

Greetings fellow dimwits:

Those were some great comments by the AJC/DNC Management @ 2:05, my most faithful and devoted propaganda outlet, no truer words have been spoken. I will have to plagiarize them here before long. Jim Jones was admired by many dhimmokrats and we passed up a great opportunity with this legendary man; had he been elected president, then the whole mofoing country would have committed suicide, not just a few hundred of you morons.

And if that would have happened, then I wouldn’t have to be standing here today, being put upon by you mouth breathers, leeches who are nothing but a bunch of Godless heathens with no religion and therefore no purpose in your sorry, mindless lives, waiting for a lightweight blowhard like me to be your messiah and chosen one, who will lead you like sheep through your parasitic existence, all the way sucking dry the very country that you hate but yet turn to for every measly, pitiful little thing that any adult would just take care of themselves.

Take pride in yourselves, you silly sycophants.

Do you think it is easy being the second coming of Adolf Hitler? To make all these stupid promises to you dullards that there is “hope” and “change” if you would only subjugate yourself to Thee All Knowing and All Seeing Government Monolith, Taker of Everything and Giver of Minuscule Trinkets?

Yes, yes, I know many of you adore your Government Trinkets and take great pleasure in getting over on your responsibilities, just remember to elect me and I will make your trinket more shiny.

How can I do this, you ask, when we are in hock up to my big fat ears to China? That is a good question and I am proud that you remember goony propaganda lesson #2, scare mongering the deficit and blaming thee Repugs for it. Have no doubt, dimwits, I am going to ravage the businesses that made America so successful and I’m going to take it to the hard workers of this country like they have never seen before, and then I’m going to give all this money to the lame and stupid, the unproductive, the hacks and thee criminals, the crack dealers from my hood, the moron welfare queens, the teacher’s union from the failed public school system and, of course, the lawyers.

And when tax revenues plummet from this audacious extortion of the successful, then I will raise taxes even more, bwa.

So gather around me, you ignorant masses of thee clueless, touch the hem of my suit coat, prostrate yourselves and weep at the very sight of my Exalted As-s, you have been blessed by thee Great and Annointed Giver Of Government Benefits, and I will lead you by thee nose through your pointless, shallow, petty and failed dependency.

Yes We Can!

Seig Heil!

Drink thee Koolaid, you stupid mofos.

By Jackie

June 8, 2008 4:31 PM | Link to this

@RW(the original)

As is typical, allegations and insinuations are made visa vie interpretations. If you will take the time to read what I said about the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution, it was pointing out the Supreme Court has begun to attack the “rights to bear arms in a well regulated militia.” Again, if that is wrong, please enlighten me. How could you, your garden chores are required? Throw the rock, hide your hand concept, it appears to me.

As for Justices Ginsberg and Stephens, I think I said there were only 2 moderates on the court with the rest being conservatives and far-right. What did I miss? Better yet, what did YOU miss?

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 4:42 PM | Link to this

Cnn just reported that Big Brown has been shot by his owners, not for being lame, well yes, for being lame.

Wooten writes, “..common liberal misconception is that our enemies dont understand us and can be assuaged with rhetoric and diplomacy”. That’s a common conservative lie about liberals. Liberals just dont believe in arbitrary war. Liberals feel that war should be a last resort, and only when all diplomatic avenues have been exhausted. Bush went to Iraq like it was a game. Shame on the right.

Conservatism is so dead. How dead is it? Conservatism is so dead that the maggots are blogging. (little Iphones and blackberries. Can you see dusty as a maggot furiously demanding to know which of us are terrorists? LOL! Oh i make a funny. LOL. There is goat milk coming out my nose. OMG! Dusty has deduced from the goatmilk joke that I am a sleeper cell man, protect me allah from devil dusty.)

Praise be allah! May the fleas of a thousand maggots infect dusty’s armpits!!! I make another funny. more goatmilk and even goatcheese is coming out my nose. OMG. now dusty think’s I’m OBL himself. Allah protect me! bwa.)

Obwama 08: He’s wont say bwa. But we will in November.

By Ed Robinson

June 8, 2008 4:43 PM | Link to this

Dear Jim W.

I will give you an answer to your question “What have we done”i.e. nominating Barak Obama, etc.: WE can blame the neo Conservative Republicans and President Bush for their lack luster handling of the economy, the current oil situation, and a refusal to listen to about 80% of the American public that would like someting done about Illegal Immigration ….enforcing laws and quotas already on the books,plus doing a much better job on the budget and keeping their dirty paws out of the cash register. The immaturiy of the Republican party and a bull headed, most inarticulate President has put Obama at the head of he opposition that may just wipe out Republicans in Congress and make a gift of the White House to the worse possible candidate from either party to come down the pike in the last 100 years.

By D

June 8, 2008 4:45 PM | Link to this

I have the perfect solution to all of our problems. We, as a people, have no constitutional right to vote for President. The states have been kind enough to bestow that on us, but since we as Americans can’t seem to pick a good President, let’s just go back to having one picked for us by electors chosen by our legislatures.

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 4:58 PM | Link to this

I am Lady Liberty, the Mother of Exiles. Listen American Heart: “Vote despite that Bush has left you tired and poor, homeless and tempest-tossed. Vote out the storied pomp of those elite brazen conservative giants. America needs it’s huddled masses, yearning to breathe free of being the wretched refuse of our teeming shores.”

Listen American Heart: “Obama can bring justice back to America. McCain is Bush with a mask and a prettier wife. Dont be fooled. It’s not nice to fool Lady Liberty!”

By Mother of Exiles

June 8, 2008 5:15 PM | Link to this

I am Lady Liberty, the Mother of Exiles. Listen American Heart: “Vote in huddled masses despite the fact that Bush has left you tired and poor, homeless and tempest-tossed. Vote out the storied pomp of those elite brazen conservative giants. American Heart, I feel you yearning to breathe free of being the wretched refuse of your own teeming shores.”

Listen American Heart: “Obama can bring justice back to America. McCain is Bush with a mask and a prettier wife. Dont be fooled. It’s not nice to fool Lady Liberty!”

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2008 6:05 PM | Link to this

Jackie,

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

For the record I would say we have two originalists, two moderately conservative, two liberals, and three barking moonbats on the court right now.

Now back to the second amendment, your reading that the individual has to be in the well regulated militia doesn’t fit the formulation of the text. Why do you suppose the founders would write a bill of rights containing ten amendments and have nine pertain to the individual and one to the state?

By Kay

June 9, 2008 8:13 AM | Link to this

Thank you, Jim, for a well thought out, and on target commentary. Now, the question is “What will we do?”

By Kay

June 9, 2008 8:14 AM | Link to this

Thank you, Jim, for a well thought out, and on target commentary. Now, the question is “What will we do?”

By Sue

June 9, 2008 8:18 AM | Link to this

What have WE done? I guess Mr. Wooten means his colleagues at the AJC. They are certainly complicit in the media’s annointing of Senator Obama. Too bad newspapers feel they must compete with the 24 hour news channels in doing more opining than reporting. What they do is much more deceitful: not reporting information negative to the candidate they prefer. I wish I hadn’t paper trained my dog 15 years ago; I’d cancel my AJC subscription. I’ll be sad to eventually lose my dog but not so sad to lose the AJC.

By Copyleft

June 9, 2008 8:22 AM | Link to this

Finally, Mr. Wooten’s getting scared. He has finally recognized that President Obama will be running the country the right way—the LIBERAL way—and that he and the dwindling remnant of neocon-drones are on their way OUT.

Good news all around! Thanks, Wooten!

By Maxine

June 9, 2008 8:31 AM | Link to this

It’s amazing how Republicans will use anything to discredit a man who has an overwhelming possibility of being our next president of the United States. His resume obviously qualified him to be a contender and got him this far in the race. Have you all forgotten that we live in a democratic society and it’s the people that ultimately decides.

Instead of looking at Obama’s lack of experience why not look at what the Republican have done to the economy in the eight years in power. If you remember nothing you should remember this word FORECLOSURES, and at an all time high… We now have a man who has new ideas, and a sensible approach to health care, terrorism, and our Armed Forces.

Obama has my vote come November 2008 and November 2012

By Maxine

June 9, 2008 8:33 AM | Link to this

It’s amazing how Republicans will use anything to discredit a man who has an overwhelming possibility of being our next president of the United States. His resume obviously qualified him to be a contender and got him this far in the race. Have you all forgotten that we live in a democratic society and it’s the people that ultimately decides.

Instead of looking at Obama’s lack of experience why not look at what the Republican have done to the economy in the eight years in power. If you remember nothing you should remember this word FORECLOSURES, and at an all time high… We now have a man who has new ideas, and a sensible approach to health care, terrorism, and our Armed Forces.

Obama has my vote come November 2008 and November 2012

By Maxine

June 9, 2008 8:37 AM | Link to this

It’s amazing how Republicans will use anything to discredit a man who has an overwhelming possibility of being our next president of the United States. His resume obviously qualified him to be a contender and got him this far in the race. Have you all forgotten that we live in a democratic society and it’s the people that ultimately decides.

Instead of looking at Obama’s lack of experience why not look at what the Republican have done to the economy in the eight years in power. If you remember nothing you should remember this word FORECLOSURES, and at an all time high… We now have a man who has new ideas, and a sensible approach to health care, terrorism, and our Armed Forces.

Obama has my vote come November 2008 and November 2012

By Freeman

June 9, 2008 10:11 AM | Link to this

In responding to Mr. Wooten’s column regarding Senator Obama’s ‘flimsy’ resume’, I can recall that the two most recent individuals to occupy the haloed positioned of President of the United States of America (Clinton and G. W. Bush/Bush 43)ascended to their coveted status without the benefit of serving in the national electorate (Congress, Senate, House of Representatives, etc.).
The perceived lack of experience did not preclude Presidents Clinton and Bush from attaining residency in the White House - to varying degrees of success and failure for both. My belief is that the Conservative right-wing of the American political structure has an innate fear of the galvanizing power exhibited by Senator Obama in his campaign for the Democratic nomination for the Presidency of the United States of America. As Senator Obama’s core constituency swelled to include college-age youths and whites in middle america, many segments of the power elite in this country began to dread the possible coalescing of groups who represented diverse points of view and a willingness to engage and unite for the CHANGE in the regime establishment to which the United States of America has become so accustomed. This fear is borne out a sense that control over the minds and will of the people that has been enjoyed by the elite class in this country for over two hundred and thirty years may be ending.

By Fred Little

June 9, 2008 11:47 AM | Link to this

Obi-Bam (may the farce be with you)will make Jimmy Carter, the absolute worst president in living memory, look like a statesman.

By Pat

June 9, 2008 12:39 PM | Link to this

What a thoughtful, insightful column Jim. Odd though, that you now say Hillary is a savvy experienced public servant - not the anti-Christ you really think she is. Sorry, I don’t buy it. You hate Hill plenty - just refocusing for November follies. Odder still though, (if OB’s “inexperience” keeps you up nights), was your total lack of concern back in 2000 when the Repubs handed their nomination to a chuckle-headed ‘tard who barely scraped a gentleman’s “C” (that’s really an “F” for we who had to earn grades) during his legacy-admission Yale stint and who couldn’t have found Afghanistan with a Worldbook Children’s Atlas and a flashlight. Idiocy, it appears, is no barrier to carrying water on behalf of the well-connected. It was sad, but hilarious to watch intelligent, educated conservatives like Bill Buckley and George Will attempt stammering endorsements of this fool - usually translated as, “don’t worry, he’s not as stupid as he seems.” Wrong, guys. After this cretin, too lazy to read more than 2 pages who thinks God directs his every whim, are we really supposed to fear a smart guy who communicates in complete sentences? We tried stupid - it didn’t work.

By ncgreybr

June 9, 2008 1:38 PM | Link to this

Again Jim flip-flops…. Just a few weeks ago he was praising Obama…oh! Wait! That’s when Wooten thought Hillary was going to take it!

Sorry, Jim, but being a POW does not qualify anyone for anything except sympathy. His daddy got McCain into a cushy academy just the same way Bush’s daddy got Bush into the National Guard.

Now, as for Rufus…. You can add my mother’s name to the list of people who died under Bill’s administration…of course she was 89 and voted for him twice BUT SHE DIED! IT MUST BE CLINTON’S FAULT!

By ncgreybr

June 9, 2008 2:58 PM | Link to this

Ya gotta love it!!

I just got an email from a right wing group complaining about Obama’s voting record.

“And, of course, Barack Obama voted YES on the McCain-Kennedy so-called “comprehensive immigration reform” AMNESTY bill.”

Hello!! Hello!! It’s called the McCAIN-Kennedy ” bill because YOUR candidate WROTE IT.

By Ms. Tucker If Ur Nasty

June 9, 2008 5:09 PM | Link to this

Rest easy my friends, we’re going to have the Ancient Mariner for at least four years. Within those four years, many young people will die, gas will probably peak at $16.00 a gallon, and the Republicans will find a way to blame it all on Obama and Rev. Wright.

By statewaterheaterpartscori

August 19, 2008 6:41 PM | Link to this

The site www.ajc.com is excellent site, tnks, webmaster. look at this [url=http://carolinecs.150m.com/statewaterheater_prices.html] state water heater prices [/url]

By djroicnyw qyhkdi

October 26, 2008 4:05 AM | Link to this

gdlhj himcal devtfsk gutnqadvh wextia alhf tchwxsjf

By djroicnyw qyhkdi

October 26, 2008 4:05 AM | Link to this

gdlhj himcal devtfsk gutnqadvh wextia alhf tchwxsjf

By djroicnyw qyhkdi

October 26, 2008 4:06 AM | Link to this

gdlhj himcal devtfsk gutnqadvh wextia alhf tchwxsjf

By djroicnyw qyhkdi

October 26, 2008 4:07 AM | Link to this

gdlhj himcal devtfsk gutnqadvh wextia alhf tchwxsjf

By ohznmyiak arebtxvom

February 19, 2009 1:05 AM | Link to this

hbnx smvjkuw elft utgdrvf ajrekocs yijkgeazn gmnho

By ohznmyiak arebtxvom

February 19, 2009 1:05 AM | Link to this

hbnx smvjkuw elft utgdrvf ajrekocs yijkgeazn gmnho

By ohznmyiak arebtxvom

February 19, 2009 1:06 AM | Link to this

hbnx smvjkuw elft utgdrvf ajrekocs yijkgeazn gmnho

By ohznmyiak arebtxvom

February 19, 2009 1:08 AM | Link to this

hbnx smvjkuw elft utgdrvf ajrekocs yijkgeazn gmnho

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.ajc.com) = text to be linked



There will be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Kudzu Services » Find the right people for the job