Home > Thinking Right > Archives > 2008 > March > 15 > Entry
Joking aside, it’s time for car tax break
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
I don’t get the joke. Sorry. I don’t.
“I think the people of Georgia get the joke,” said Gov. Sonny Perdue, ridiculing a proposed constitutional amendment that passed the Georgia House of Representatives 166-5 last week to virtually eliminate the property tax on personal cars, trucks and motorcycles.
It’s not a perfect plan — but it is one that offers relief to 93 percent of the households in Georgia.
It’s not perfect because a niggling $10 tax to create a state trauma network would be applied to personal and commercial vehicles. With some low-value vehicles, a $10 tax will exceed existing property taxes. The real concern, however, is that it’s not a clean break. It plants a tax that’s certain to grow. Future tax-and-spenders won’t have to clear that hurdle of public opposition to a new tax.
After the House passed the resolution, Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle found himself in the position of a player in Hasbro’s Twister, a once-popular game designed to tie players in knots. Keep in mind that this is a tax cut, one reducing government’s take by $672 million in the 2011 fiscal year. No Republican and only five Democrats — three from the Atlanta area and two from Athens — voted against it.
Cagle’s twist started with the apparent objection that relief is needlessly delayed because it “doesn’t provide the full amount of relief for two years.” He’s for it, right? “Why are we waiting two years to cut taxes instead of having the courage to do it right now?” He’s for it, right?
Wrong. He opposes, or seems to, this particular method of allowing Georgians to keep $672 million of their earnings.
He’s interested, he said, in coming up with a “broad economic stimulus plan that will create jobs today.” The name Cagle and “economic stimulus” first appeared in this newspaper on Friday, March 14. We are now nine working days away from the end of the session.
Cagle did something similar last year in informing House leaders after they had passed a budget that the Senate would not agree to pork. The timing of the declaration touched off the three-way disaster that last year’s session became for Republicans.
This tax proposal, or a variant of it, has been in play for more than a year. Alternatives, specific or philosophical, could have been aired at any stage. “The first word that I ever heard that he [Cagle] had an economic stimulus idea was yesterday,” said House President Pro Tem Mark Burkhalter (R-Alpharetta), who first proposed the “birthday tax” relief.
Cagle’s declaration coincided with Perdue’s “get the joke” assertion. Georgians “want infrastructure, they want education and they want the government to work for them,” he said. He worries that the combination of tax cuts, including one he proposed that will amount to about $90 million, will total about $750 million, leaving the state with too little spending money.
Burkhalter noted that taxes collected from the $3.6 billion that will come to Georgia as a result of the federal economic stimulus package, estimated to be $240 million, plus the $90 million represented by Perdue’s effort to repeal a quarter-mill the state collects in local property taxes, would fund the first full year of the House’s proposed tax relief.
He pointed out, too, that as a state senator, Perdue voted to remove the sales tax from groceries, which at the time amounted to 5 percent of the state budget. The car tax relief is about half that, he said, and furthermore the state has a surplus of $1.6 billion. “We are still fiscally very sound. … We will still grow 4.5 percent in the ‘09 budget. …”
While there’s a legitimate debate to be had about how much of our money government “needs,” it’s clear that, like the Democrats before them, Republicans will find a worthy need for every dollar available. They don’t have the courage to accept for themselves the cap on spending that many legislators would impose as spending discipline on local governments. The only real option then is to fund essential needs — and then return the excess collections.
The line of money-seekers is endless when there’s money on the table. To force priorities, limit collections. The House of Representatives, with only five dissenting votes, did that this week. No joke.
Permalink | Comments (185) | Post your comment | Categories: Column




DEL.ICIO.US


Comments
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 8:04 AM | Link to this
Maybe if they were doing something worthwile with the tax money they already have, like, for instance, reducing traffic congestion, providing low cost, abundant water or a quality education for our children, then the “birthday tax” wouldn’t be that big of a deal.
But, instead, they want to increase the size of the no account, unproductive, mindless bureaucracy.
I don’t get the joke either.
~~~~~
See if you can make any sense of this:
{{{{Iran reformists face uphill battle. Liberals’ reality: Avoid a sweep by old guard. Tehran, Iran —- Hardliners allied with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took a small lead in Iran’s parliamentary elections, according to partial results early today, but reformists showed strength in some cities where the clerical leadership allowed them to compete.-Urinal}}}}
Allowed to compete: Here, put your ballot in that box and then go stand in line so we can stone you to death.
And the Urinal just plays right along with the terrorists like it is all legitimate.
Who would have ever thought the pinkos at the AJC would be in favor of extremist religious rule?
Christianity must be too mild for them, eh?
~~~~~
After 20 years of faithful attendance in his church, being married by him and having his children baptized there
{{{{Obama denounces pastor’s remarks-Urinal}}}}
Yeah, O.K. AJC.
~~~~~
{{{{Oklahoma City —- A YouTube audio clip of a state lawmaker’s screed against homosexuality, which she called a bigger threat than terrorism, has outraged gay activists and brought death threats rolling in.-Urinal}}}}
Not that I agree with the statement but apparently she’s got a point.
After all, terrorism is just a bumper sticker, right?
~~~~~
{{{{What stood out for many about the trial was one of the jurors. He was deaf. Though a deaf juror is not unprecedented, it is rare, according to jury experts and advocates for the hearing impaired, and it was a first for the veteran judge, the attorneys and the other jurors. Two interpreters translated the proceedings into sign language.}}}}
{{{{“I thought it was a special thing for the judicial system and for the community,” said Senior Judge Stephanie Manis, who has served on the Superior Court bench since 1995.-Urinal}}}}
Why does it always amaze a pinko when the disadvantaged forego the whining about their victim status and just take the responsibility to lead normal, productive lives?
Novel idea, isn’t it?
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 8:22 AM | Link to this
{{{{Late Wednesday afternoon, Sen.Wayne Allard (R-Co.) introduced Amendment 4246 into the Senate budget debate. The amendment, which Allard calls “The Obama Spend-o-Rama” proposes funding 111 of the 188 spending proposals put out so far during Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) presidential campaign. (These were the proposals which Allard’s staff had time to analyze before the GOP leadership asked him to offer the amendment on the floor.) According to Allard, “There are another 77 proposals with unknown cost estimates that will add billions to this number.”}}}}
{{{{Allard freely admits that he will oppose his own amendment and urges other Senators to do the same. But, as a senior Senate staffer pointed out to HUMAN EVENTS, “Let’s see how many Senators who have endorsed Obama will actually vote for his budget.”}}}}
{{{{Some of the numbers around the federal budget are incomprehensibly large. How do you wrap your mind around a 5-year cost of $1.4 trillion?}}}}
{{{{The Allard amendment went down to a 97-0 defeat late Thursday afternoon, to nobody’s surprise.}}}}
All of the libs in the Senate voting against the kampaign promises of their presidential kandidates, does this not raise a few questions?
Are the two light weights, Obambi and Klux Rodham, lying to their voters?
Are they unable to comprehend what they are promising?
Are they approaching their policy ideas unilaterally without any consensus from other lawmakers?
Geez.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 8:34 AM | Link to this
No country for old men starts with a long, elaborate voice-over. The only time a voice-over has ever worked was the barking in the beginning of old yeller. (Brood Simple?)
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 8:37 AM | Link to this
{{{{The founder of the Weather Channel wants to sue Al Gore for fraud, hoping a legal debate will settle the global-warming debate once and for all.}}}}
{{{{John Coleman, who founded the cable network in 1982, suggests suing for fraud proponents of global warming, including Al Gore, and companies that sell carbon credits.}}}}
{{{{“Is he committing financial fraud? That is the question,” Coleman said.}}}}
{{{{“Since we can’t get a debate, I thought perhaps if we had a legal challenge and went into a court of law, where it was our scientists and their scientists, and all the legal proceedings with the discovery and all their documents from both sides and scientific testimony from both sides, we could finally get a good solid debate on the issue,” Coleman said. “I’m confident that the advocates of ‘no significant effect from carbon dioxide’ would win the case.”}}}}
Considering what is at risk here, that being an environmental terrorist attack on the economy of the United States, I say let’s drag them into court.
Or fly them to court in their Gulfstreams, whatever.
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 8:46 AM | Link to this
Something to look forward to:
{{{{Former New York Governor Mario Cuomo said the presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama could be “ruinous” for the Democratic Party if the contest isn’t resolved before the August nominating convention.}}}}
It’ll be like Christmas in August.
Bwa.
By ron
March 15, 2008 8:48 AM | Link to this
Good mmorning Jim.As I stated yesterday,the trauma tax will increase yearly until the savings realized by the tax cut are again collected.Since ths is a flat tax,the people with the new,expensive cars will pay less and the people with the old clunkers will pay more.I suppose this seems fair except that the people with new,expensive tend to use their vehicles more than people with old clunkers.Sort of redistributing the tax burden downward.
Bad mess downtown.Keep us posted.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 9:08 AM | Link to this
Monica Lewinski released her memoir yesterday about her time as white house intern. Clinton may or may not have inhaled, but she insists she didn’t swallow.
The FBI has arrested another john from the Washington DC hooker ring, who is supposedly tied to Osama Bin Laden. He’s client number 911.
By Redneck Convert
March 15, 2008 9:11 AM | Link to this
Well, Joe Bill wired up a TV in my beer truck and I’m all set for watching the NCAA tournament while I deliver beer next week. Anyhow, my advise to you is not to do any driving on Thursday and Friday afternoon, as I get kind of caught up in sports and don’t pay much attention to the road. Us rednecks love our sports. GA rednecks have been meeting up in bars all over the state to watch games this week and its great for business.
I see that woman that led Spitzer astray up in NY has moved out of her apartment now. Seems the women living there got tired of paying $6900 a month and seeing 100s of news people outside the building. It always happens that way. Same thing happened to Ida Mae Brown back when she said was saving preachers by paying calls on them. The women ganged up and she was out of the trailer park lickety-split.
I don’t hold with this $10 car tax. Like this AJC Management says, it will just go up and up. AJC Management might be a little touched at times and dribble along like a guy with a case of the runs, but sometimes he makes alot of sense. Besides, I don’t want my money for a liscence tag going to a bunch of Those People down at Grady.
Well, I guess I’ll watch my Dawgs play today. God must of not wanted them to play last night so he sent some winds that run them out of the building. Anyway, they been loosing so much this year you can’t tell them apart from a Tech team. That woman that come in there a few years ago and made them start going to class just ruint the Dawgs except in football. Leave it to a woman to ruin a good thing.
Have a good weekend everybody.
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 9:13 AM | Link to this
First off, Sonny’s “joke” jibe comes as a shock to me, because I truly thought the late Governor had been heard from last down in Florida, where a couple fraternity boys were arrested for playing “Weekend at Bernie’s” with Sonny’s corporeal tent. But evidently he wasn’t dead when he made this “joke”, and yet last night he was nowhere to be found when Downtown was thrust into a natural disaster emergency. So now I don’t know what to think. If Sonny Perdue is actually still living and is still governing Georgia, maybe the joke’s on us.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 9:44 AM | Link to this
Of Course the car tax is a painful yearly crucible for all Georgians. So is the inspection fee. Ditto the gasoline tax. It’s ridiculous. Nobody wants to pay the car fees. Nobody. No argument.
By Abomi Nation
March 15, 2008 9:56 AM | Link to this
All joking aside Jim, don’t you think “A birthday gift to rev up hopes of Democrats,” would have been a better headline for todays blog?
By Lake Sincalir
March 15, 2008 9:57 AM | Link to this
Mr. Jim, what do you want to give up? Water, roads, what? These things take money. Cutting taxes is not the thing to do right now. Especially, in light of the down economy.
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 10:11 AM | Link to this
Omigawd! This is no laughing matter! When Jim says no joking, he means no joking! No joking.
Don’t you realize that if this vehicle tax is rolled back, we’ll all have to give up something? What do you want to give up? Sunday walks in the park? You like the park, don’t you? You like the lawn mowed, and the trees tended? Who do you think pays for that? We all do?
Do you want to give up bridges, and let them fall into the Hooch? Can you swim?
Do you want to give up breathing, or do you just naturally thrive on dirty air that’s baking the Earth to a polluted CRISP?
Do you want to give up the Polar Bear Cubs? Do you want to have to explain to your children why you killed the Polar Bears because you wouldn’t pay the cost of doing Georgia’s business the way Georgia business is done by Georgians who don’t know “business” from what “is” is?
For shame.
By gdrla
March 15, 2008 10:26 AM | Link to this
Keep the local ad valorum (car tax) on cars & houses. That is money spent in my local community (Gwinnett County) that is a direct benefit to me. I can see road improvements, police presence, fire stations & libraries, etc., as a result of this tax. Plus I get to vote for/against those who spend my money thus collected.
If we are going to have tax reform in Georgia, why don’t we reduce the state income tax that goes a long way toward paying the salaries of idots such as Glenn Richardson, Speaker of the House. Ronald Reagan must be rolling in his grave at what the present generation of ‘Reagan Republicans’ are trying to do in his name & as a result of his legacy.
Move the power & $$ back down the chain to the local level - to quote John Lennon “Power to the People!” NOT to Glenn Richardson & others of his ilk who think they know better than ME as to how to deal with MY money.
By Paul Kael
March 15, 2008 10:26 AM | Link to this
ill bred, you ignernt slut, that was a fa-lawless movie. And there’s nothing wrong with voice-over provided the tailor is consummate and the cloth fits. It worked in that picture. It’s worked in lots of pictures. But only a few tailors can handle it anymore without it coming out like a wash-and-wear seersucker suit. Slut.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 10:27 AM | Link to this
The once-popular ad valorem tax, designed to tithe drivers into have-nots, is a particularly aggregious tax which frequently finds payers with their rear ends high up in the air, yeilding, while assemblies ply their tread-bare asphalt laws of misaligned steering committees and ungraded backalley deals.
By Lord Bulwer-Lytton
March 15, 2008 10:41 AM | Link to this
I say, ill bred, well said. Harumph. Could not myself have said better that which you have said, and said with a saying that says both the said and true and the truly unsaid. Hear, hear!
By getalife
March 15, 2008 10:42 AM | Link to this
Hagee spewed you were hit because there is too much sin in Atlanta and Obama’s spiritual adviser preached God damn Atlanta.
Freaking kooks but shows why they wanted seperation of church and State.
Guess what folks, Clinton does not have a kook radical spiritual adviser. Her pastor stays out of politics like they should.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 10:52 AM | Link to this
No country made no sense. Seasoned drug war survivors at every level let themselves be sitting ducks when everyone involved has machine pistols and hand cannons? Lazy writing.
Every scene shows the bad guy bursting into another hotel room and killing drug banditos at point blank range like they never thought anyone would ambush them simply because they’re trying to get their 2.4 million. Ridiculous. If you or I were on the trail of the money left over in a drug deal gone bad, we’d never check into a hotel and watch tv. We’d be smarter, and we’re not even drug players.
This is just stupid lazy movie making. Tommy Lee Jones has the money. He talks about lying. He recounts his dream of getting money and losing it.
The Bad Guy goes back to the hotel room to look for the money long after the banditos rushed pell mell from the last shootout over the money, so they couldn’t have had it, or the Bad Guy woulda known it and gone after them, found them, burst into the hotel room they had just checked into, and keeled them a thousand times….. No, Tommy Lee Jones was the first on the scene, and he knew where the money would be and he took it.
The most inexpicable scene in the movie was when Tommy Lee Jones went back to the last hotel room crime scene. I understand why he went in, because he had to convince the Bad Guy that he, too, didn’t have the money. But the Bad Guy was waiting for him behind the door. Why didn’t he simply shoot Tommy Lee Jones? And where did the Bad Guy go when Tommy Lee Jones busted open the door? He was right there, six inches away from Tommy Lee Jones, standing holding his shotgun right behind the door that Tommy Lee Jones just kicked open. He’s a ghost, I know. Great writing.
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 11:11 AM | Link to this
Glenn@9:13
Glenn, what are you talking about? I could not make heads or tails of that post. Nobody could find the guv last night? So he’s dead? Were you twisted by the tornado as it whipped through?
You also seem unhappy about the tax cut. Don’t you like tax cuts? I think you are a California conservative, Glenn. You don’t like conservative commentators like Jim. You don’t like conservative governors like Perdue. You don’t like conservative tax cuts. But you insist that you are CONSERVATIVE. In what way?
Hmmmm OK…if you say so…you’re just left of right and around the corner and out of sight etc. etc. etc…..
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 11:15 AM | Link to this
IllBread aka PoFo aka Mr Smithee of movie moments @10:52
I like tax cuts and movie cuts. Would you cut out the cute? Thank you.
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 11:19 AM | Link to this
{{{{On the other hand, the financial system also can’t function properly if every institution believes it is “too big to fail.” That’s an invitation for everyone to behave the way Bear Stearns did in the mortgage securities market. This means that if taxpayer funds are going to be used to rescue Bear, then Bear’s private actors need to accept their own form of discipline.}}}}
Ding, ding, ding, the Wall Street Journal wins a prize.
The Fed is funding risky behaviour by bailing out lenders from their bad loans, which is probably the wise thing to do, after all, a banking free fall would not be of any positive benefit right now.
But from here on out, no more risky loans to the poor, the lazy or the financial dimwits.
Let’s let them move into cardboard boxes, and ban outdoor fires at the same time, then we will have a nice safe mortgage industry and plus, all these former home owners will be carbon neutral!
After all, government intervention in the private sector never caused any harm, has it?
On second thought, scratch all that^^.
You libs and your little election year kkkampaign to downgrade the economy, and you know full well what I’m talking about, are intentionally harming the least among us, the poor and the needy.
Would Jesus employ such tactics?
You, Code Pinko, are the cause of high energy prices, with your junk science alarmism and your blatant over regulation of the private energy sector.
Do you truly believe that your calls to tax the “windfall profits” of “big oil” has no effect on energy prices?
Energy prices that add costs to the operations of almost every industry; food, transportation, manufacturing?
How about your presidential kkkandidates and their hollow promises of increased government spending, which can only lead to higher taxes?
Do you think this does not have a negative effect on the actions of the investor class?
And how about you “news” paper propaganda kampaign to spin every bit of economic news to portray the worst scenario possible. Up to and including the most absolute bald faced lies that you can scheme up, see Krugman, Paul?
Just to name a few of your sick, depraved little plots.
Behold the havoc that you have wrought, Power Hungry demokrats, the suffering that you have caused doesn’t bother you in the least bit, does it?
And Republicans, why the silence? Why not frame these actions so that all can understand them?
Make the average dimwit understand how the demokrats are deliberately harming their economic situation, raising the costs of their basic necessities, stagnating their wages, losing their jobs.
And then see how quickly you could regain the majority.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 11:23 AM | Link to this
You R a movie.
By Curious Observer
March 15, 2008 11:33 AM | Link to this
Let me guess how this will end if the auto tax is removed. Next year, the Republican legislature will discover there’s not enough money to fund everything, so Peachcare and Medicaid and other services for the poor will get whacked. “Starve the beast,” right, jbmlaw?
And the year after that we’ll see the imposition of an additional penny’s sales tax to fund “essential public services.” There’s nothing like some good old-fashioned tax-shifting from the affluent to the poor and middle class. Bush redux. Also, the legislature seems to be ignoring the fact that it’s counties, not the state, that would be giving up the revenue. But then, “local control” is OK as a Republican philosophy but irrelevant when the issue comes down to centralization of power in a Republican legislature.
So watch out, homeowners. If you think your property taxes are high now, just wait until the counties start scrambling for funds to pay for schools and other services.
For the first time in his political life, Sonny is right. This expedient rush to buy votes is a joke, one that most Georgia people won’t find very funny.
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 11:36 AM | Link to this
To whit:
{{{{Hope alone won’t carry us through the valley of the shadow of debt. The fact that neither Mrs. Clinton nor Mr. Obama has made cost-cutting a part of their political vocabulary is a clear indication that they would increase spending. In fact, Mrs. Clinton has already proven skillful at snagging pork. Over the past few years alone, she has attached some $2.2 billion in earmarks to federal spending bills. Mr. McCain has asked for exactly $0 in earmarks.}}}}
{{{{And while Mr. Obama’s oratorical skills have been inspiring, his proposals would entail roughly the same $800 billion in new government spending that Mrs. Clinton proposes. To his credit, Mr. Obama admits that his spending proposals will take more than three clicks of his heels to fund. He would pay for his priorities with a bevy of tax increases which he hopes taxpayers won’t notice.}}}}
{{{{But taxpayers will notice. Mr. Obama plans to raise taxes on capital gains, dividends and corporate profits. He wants to hike estate taxes by 50%. And he wants to eliminate the cap on payroll taxes. These tax hikes would increase the burden borne by individuals and decrease the competitiveness of our economy.}}}}
We need to send these tax money mongering dimwit liberals back to the little race baiting victim industries from whence they came.
Or we could just let them completely ruin the demokrat party with their bigot festival presidential nomination process.
Either way is cool with me.
By BadOleBoys
March 15, 2008 11:36 AM | Link to this
Some people are consistent — aren’t they? Cagle has been busy dumping some of his perverse views on the public at least since he was a state senator. So, when he says that he wants a broad economic stimulus plan, he could likely mean that he just wants some of his supporters to be able to spread the crap out over a larger surface area. Just go back and look closely at Senate Bill 54 that he sponsored in 2005. The next time you are standing knee deep in crap and still can’t figure out where the smell is coming from, look no farther than your Incumbent Georgia Republican. The state senate certainly has nerve to refer to some of their efforts as “deliberating”.
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 11:50 AM | Link to this
AJC Management,11:19
I think you understand the Democrats only too well. Their ‘Undermine the USA’ started almost eight years ago when they lost the election. Since then it has been a policy of wreck anything so they can say Bush did it!!(meaning Republicans, of course). Everything from anti-war, anti-military such as anti-surge lies, anti-Katrina efforts, oil accusations,endless investigations amounting to nothing but expense. The list goes on.
I would hope that sensible Democrats would reign in this major subversive element. But, so far, I don’t see much hope in the “nominees” they are putting forward. A power crazed woman and a sweet talking anti-war freshman are not the answers. Democrats offer nothing that would make a conservative even consider making a “change”.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 11:57 AM | Link to this
The real problem with the Iraq War is found in the dictionary under the word Phyrric. We spent a trillion dollars with the multiplier effect that fuels our economy. That trillion should have become three trillion by now! Our economy would be rocking and rolling.
Cheney did the Carysle Group’s Saudi directed bidding by dumping the entire trillion into a hole in the sand in Iraq.
The Carlysle Group is breaking up, notice? They are going deeper into another layer of cover-corporations because investigators are getting too close to proving where most of that trillion dollars went: Cheney’s safe.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 12:07 PM | Link to this
I meant sphyncter, not pyrrhic. In fact forget the entire comment, I thought this was the woman to woman page, sorry.
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 12:08 PM | Link to this
Hi Dusty,
All I’m saying about Sonny is that he’s an empty suit. He doesn’t govern. I can’t even tell whether he’s a conservative or is, like Jim, a conservative who’s trying to keep his conservatism despite his profoundly liberal training.
The State Constitution requires Mr. Perdue to perform the duties he assumed under oath. The People may recall him for either wrongdoing or nonfeasance. I absolutely am not accusing Sonny Perdue of wrongdoing, but I have been accusing him, since last Summer, of nonfeasance—-the failure to perform his duties. His handling of the drought, for example, is a story of nonfeasance. I’m relatively certain it’s not the only one.
I personally can judge his politics best on that ground which I know best: education. He has imported an input-output model of Oregonian provenance which model I analyzed, on behalf of the Getty Trust, for the State of California. It is counterproductive in the extreme. Even Jim has disowned it, though initially he cheered it. It is, among other things, the essence of liberalism. And I have no doubt that Sonny Perdue has any idea that it is. He just accepts liberal thinking without recognizing it as such. I, and others, call that “schooled up”.
As to my own political creed, I’m an exceedingly unoriginal, very orthodox conservative. Mine is radical conservatism in the sense of “roots conservatism”. (Radical means “rooted”, or of the root.) It predates Goldwater (a late friend of the family) and even Strauss by some 750 years.
I’d like you to know that in CA I was the first Democratic consultant (I worked, as a conservative, for Dems for years; and also for GOP; and largely as a liaison between the two, both in Sac. & DC) to cross the line and join the half-dozen GOP conservatives in their ridiculed effort to oust the perfectly liberal Governor Gray Davis, a man I’d come, through some shocking familiarity, to despise—-especially for his exploitation of “education” as nothing more than a political tool and a bank. When it became clear that we had succeeded in forcing a recall election and that we were going to be successful, I worked for the election of Tom McClintock, the man who would have been Governor had the “California conservative” not run. If you can find an elected official anywhere in America whose conservatism is more to your liking than McClintock’s is, please point her or him out to me.
As to the tax cuts, hell yes I like tax cuts. I’ve seen so many billions of dollars over the years go to making the quality of American life worse, in the name of making it better, that I want to see a festival of tax-cutting. But Speaker Richardson, and evidently Governor Perdue as well (it’s hard to tell with a corpse), cannot think of how to cut taxes here without backfilling the revenue loss over there, so that they can continue the hideous spending they can’t even see as hideous.
Meanwhile, Jim’s all over the map, Dusty. Don’t you think it’s the task of the faithful reader to referee his “Common Sense Conservatism”? Because he thinks it’s our task. If you continue to cowpunch with those who ride herd on Jim’s “common sense”, I’ll continue to cowpunch with those who ride herd on his “conservatism”. Deal?
It’s a liberal country, Dusty. That’s got to change, or some even worse things will happen very soon.
By getalife
March 15, 2008 12:09 PM | Link to this
No crusty, your failed party and President cut and ran from obl to change this country and you cheered it on .
“Bush Legacy: China Defends Its Use of Torture By Citing The Bush Torture Program Published 1, March 13, 2008 Bizarre , Congress , Constitutional Law , Criminal law , Politics , Society
The Bush Administration has long been ridiculed by the international community as converting the United States from a leader in human rights to the very symbol of the violation of core principles of human rights. However, few were prepared for the utter hypocrisy of watching the Administration condemn China for its use of torture on the very same time that President Bush vetoed a ban on the use of torture in the waterboarding bill. Now China is using our torture program to defend its own abuses.”
Disaster after disaster and yet you do not demand w to resign you cheer him on. Look at the economy stupid.
The change we need is to undo all the disasters your party caused and keep you in the minority forever.
Why do you support a failed party that can’t govern?
Do you hate this country because you have to hate?
WTF is wrong with you and your ilk?
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 12:18 PM | Link to this
Jesus calmed the storm. The rain stopped, and the waves disappeared. His disciples in the boat with him breathed a sigh of relief. That was a close one. But later, because Jesus took all the attention away, Pharisee Glenn criticized Jesus for his handling of the drought.
Be a good samaritan, Glenn, and stfu.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 12:23 PM | Link to this
“Hagee spewed you were hit because there is too much sin in Atlanta”
Maybe that kook is right. Any POS city that can’t find a way to prosecute and put to death a judge murderer is f’d up. New Orleans notwithstanding of course. And don’t even get me started on aggressive panhandling.
“Guess what folks, Clinton does not have a kook radical spiritual adviser. Her pastor stays out of politics like they should.”
Nah. Like Satan, she’s a chameleon. She can be a Muslim, a Baptist, a Catholic, a Scientologist, or a kook atheist (one and the same as far as I’m concerned). It all depends on her audience and who’s stupid enough to listen to her phonyass. Guess that means you, gotnolife. Shrillary’s Gerry Ferarro. Heh. Hehehe. HAHAHAHA!!!
Wow ATL is under the gun today. GLOBAL WARMING!!! Quick! Stop cooking! No more burning leaves! Stop driving! Don’t flush toilets! Walk around naked for the environment! No more eating! Don’t breath! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Now that the childish RAT liberalism is out of the way, let’s move on…
Sen. Hillary Clinton has declined to return $170,000 in campaign contributions from individuals at a company accused of widespread sexual harassment, and whose CEO is a disbarred lawyer with a criminal record, federal campaign records show.
Do we really want those assclowns back in office? Didn’t think so. Says Mississippi of all states. Hehehe.
Speaking of Miss-ippuh:
HATTIESBURG, Miss. (AP) - Democratic presidential contender Hillary Rodham Clinton tried to backpedal Friday from comments she made in October suggesting Mississippi was a backward place for women’s progress.
Just sit back and watch this wretched woman implode in November should she get the nomination (without Obama alongside her mind you).
Hillary 2008!
By AJC Management
March 15, 2008 12:26 PM | Link to this
{{{{By Dusty March 15, 2008 11:50 AM I would hope that sensible Democrats would reign in this major subversive element.}}}}
Dusty: Only 6 demokrats voted in favor of the one year ban on earmarks, which would have reduced spending by some 18 billion dollars. Out of those 6, 4 of them voted with sincerity. The other two based their votes on pure political expediency, so that John McCain could not use it as an issue against them, them being Barak Obambi and Ku Klux Rodham.
Think about that for a second. They are so power hungry that they cannot even vote for their true position in the matter, how does this differ from outright lying? Klinton is responsible for 2.2 billion in earmarks, now she is “against” them?
The hypocrisy borders on the ridiculous, she must have the lowest regard for the intelligence of her voters, just imagine her speaking truthfully for once I have 2.2 billion in earmarks to my name but it is O.K. because I voted against them.
This is so John Kerry.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 12:39 PM | Link to this
I know a lot of North Fulton residents who spend upwards of $2,000 annually on ad valorem tax yet drive down potholed roads (uhm, that’s Latin for “according to value” for you tattooed liberal democrat 20-something know-it-all freaks in the city). Isn’t government just so fair and wonderful?
By Hello?
March 15, 2008 12:42 PM | Link to this
Testing 1,2,3…
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 12:45 PM | Link to this
get, you give the impression regularly that your political memory extends back only as far as circa 1997, so that it was sometime later that you discovered that politicians do naughty things for power. Your railing against the second Bush Administration as some kind of paragon of political venality is so ahistorical as to cause one to wonder whether you have any sense whatever of anything with which to compare the Administration’s faults. See what I mean?
Also I don’t get why you’re so quick to believe last night’s rumor about anyone connected to the Administration doing anything horrid. You like your rumors lurid, extreme, fresh and damning. And veracity take the hindmost. The rumor mills you patronize don’t care whether their stuff has any substance, and you know that very well because you can see that they never correct, retract or apologize. They’re not journalism. They’re Soros fronts, compliments of McCain-Feingold.
It as though you’re coming to the Editorial table having been briefed on last night’s checkout stand tabloid. Tell enough UFO abduction stories, and sooner or later one of them will turn up credible. Maybe even true.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 12:48 PM | Link to this
The Repudlickans brought us 911, Iraq, another depression, resplendent corruption, ruinous inflation, vast unemployment, outed spies, outed senators, worthless dollars, chinese Shylocks, kids conversant in sodomy (kenn starr’s legacy), and a president who thinks he can sing.
Obamamania. You needn’t look any further for the true America we once had.
By @@
March 15, 2008 12:48 PM | Link to this
It’s not perfect because a niggling $10 tax to create a state trauma network would be applied to personal and commercial vehicles. With some low-value vehicles, a $10 tax will exceed existing property taxes. The real concern, however, is that it’s not a clean break. It plants a tax that’s certain to grow. Future tax-and-spenders won’t have to clear that hurdle of public opposition to a new tax.
Well pooh Jim. Why didn’t you say that with your first column on this amendment?
I’ve been fooled by the old “bait and switch”. ‘Ya know why?
I trust! Must be a liberal “brain stain”. I thought this was a compromise that would benefit both them and me. How wrong was I?
Out damn spot. Out I say.
It’s my birthday…have a party
It’s my birthday…have a party
Don’t invite Sonny
He’ll be tardy
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 1:08 PM | Link to this
Glenn,
My question to you was about the “death” of Guv Perdue you mentioned earlier. I gather that was a metaphor or something and you never meant actual “death”..empty suit or something. Oh well. (Is that Calisemantics you speak?)
Glenn, I don’t care if you ran the whole state of California. Your thoughts center around education and that seems to be your measure of success. It IS vitally importatnt. But so are some other things. Don’t forget about them.
Our governor is no movie star but what he says is usually said with honesty. Liberals don’t like him which shows he is doing something right. Seems to me, Georgia is progressing in many ways. Ok.. Not education. But you don’t seem to notice the good parts. I wonder why you left California for Georgia when you don’t think much of our state.
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 1:28 PM | Link to this
il bred one, as always, I’ll stfu when you do. Problem is, you never do. I’ve been called so many things, but never Pharisaic. That’s interesting.
You use that word a lot. I don’t think it means what you think it means.
Happy Birtday, @@!
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 1:32 PM | Link to this
You’re the one whose, “tard-y”.
By Prophetess Kelley P
March 15, 2008 1:38 PM | Link to this
PRAYER ADVISORY NOTICE
The State Evangelical Center has just issued a Pray For Rain moratorium for the whole State of Georgia. Damage from the Rain Prayers is extensive.
I don’t speak for all Christians but I certainly apologize for all the damage I’ve caused from my Pray For Rain vigils. We really have been careless with our Prayers and need to stop before this gets totally out of control.
What have we done????????
Forgiveness
By BadOleBoys
March 15, 2008 1:40 PM | Link to this
With the jokes aside Jim, we would have a clear path right through the middle of these Incumbent Georgia Republicans. No. The joking is not aside — it is beside itself. It is laughing it’s a$$ off at the Georgia voters that put them in office.
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 1:43 PM | Link to this
Jefferson was a Pyrrhonist, you ill bred idiot. But thanks for acknowledging the U.S. victory in Iraq. Now you can only pray for the humiliation of the dwindling U.S. and UK occupying forces. As your candidate says, you’ve got to have hope.
By getalife
March 15, 2008 2:02 PM | Link to this
Jim,
Show some patriotism and write about w should resign in disgrace.
The fed bailed out the corporation who started the mortgage mess and the collapse of the economy.
Enough is enough.
Close out your career with doing the right thing.
By mutt
March 15, 2008 2:04 PM | Link to this
Hello? Anyone here? Another tornado?
By AmVet
March 15, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this
Does anyone besides myself find it laughable that some of the loonier here protest with much righteous indignation, Sen. Clinton’s vote on earmarks as “one of political expedience”?
Wake up, morons!
She voted years ago to give you-know-who the power to do you-know-what!!! And then later found occupation “redemption” when things started going REALLY bad.
ANYBODY who thought our courageous fighter pilot and his gang of never-served, cook the books for war buffoons wouldn’t completely botch things, is not remotely capable of doing much better I fear.
I suspect she merely cow-towed to the neo-con chickenhawks and their MUCH publicized chest pounding for fear of political damage.
Gutless and craven.
And that she is not a Republican doesn’t make her one iota better than the innumerable GOP apparatchiks…
By AmVet
March 15, 2008 2:13 PM | Link to this
P, this is all getting very confusing.
What am I to pray for now?
Sunshine?
Brisk dry winds from the west?
MORE global warming?
I wish this god character would leave specific instructions…
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 2:32 PM | Link to this
Dusty, did you fall and hit your head recently? What in hell are you on about? At 11:11 you asked me to explain to you “in what way” I am a “CONSERVATIVE”. In spite of our recent differences, I took that as an earnest question, and I answered it as directly and frankly as I could. To my answer you respond by saying that you hadn’t asked that question.
Criticizing the Governor’s and Speaker’s anti-conservative proposals is really something you take as having a low regard for Georgia, as holding Georgia in low esteem, as not “thinking much” of Georgia? When have I ever said any but appreciative things of this great state? What??
And someone’s calling himself a “conservative” is really someone you take for a conservative? Really and truly? You go with the nominal definition of a conservative, and that’s that? And with the nominal definition of a Republican also (Linc Chaffee calls himself one, therefore he is one)?
Do you have a sense of how you’ve given away the game—-how you’ve lost your personal power in American public affairs—-by surrendering this kind of definitional control to others, who are professional politicians?
Had I run the State of California, or any part of it, I’d be quite ashamed today. I thought I’d made that awfully clear to you just a couple days ago, in the playful side-by-side with Mississippi. So where does your xenophobic BS come from, Dusty, Old Time Religion?
My obvious point was to show you how very presumptuous and exactly wrong you are to accuse me, of all people, of being a pseudo-conservative. Especially you of all people, because you show again and again—-and again today—-that you have given up on trying to discern who is conservative or which policies or actions are conservative. That is something you leave to politicians to tell you.
“Education” is not, by one heck of a long stretch, my measure of anything. “Education” does, however, account for most of the budget of the State of Georgia, not least because it is the greatest power reserved to Georgia under the U.S. Constitution. Do you follow? So when I say that a Georgia Governor is of dubious conservative intention because his big play on his biggest playing field is quintessentially liberal, do you think I’m quarreling with the man’s taste in barbeque?
I prefaced my remarks on Mr. Perdue’s education reform initiative by explaining, truthfully, that it was the best way for me to construe his political doctrine because it is the policy area I happen to know best. Is it not a nice coincidence that education also happens to be the pricipal business of the State of Georgia?
And what of this scolding from you: “education…IS vitally importatnt…But so are some other things. Don’t forget about them”? What might those other policy areas be which I have been in danger of forgetting, O all-seeing One? Pray tell.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 2:50 PM | Link to this
Facebook. My space. Dupre. Gaga googoo what a babe. what a babe….what a babe.
Obama 08. he’s not a babe, and he wont pay for one, but he will lead this country back from the brink of mediocrity.
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 2:56 PM | Link to this
Did I say Pyrrhic-Pharisee? I meant Peni-sucklee. I cant spell good. my bad..
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 3:17 PM | Link to this
Glenn,@2:32
If you stop ranting and raving long enough, you might be able to give a simple answer, not write a book.
I believe that most of your complaints come because you disagree with conservative decisions (Guv, Jim,Bush, etc.). Therefore I question whether you should call yourself conservative.
I find myself a conservative because I like more conservative policies than those of liberals. Many more.
If you like Georgia, I had not noticed. Please rehash some of your compliments. If I remember correctly, your comments on the Mississippi subject were mostly about California.
Relax, Glenn. This is just a blog, not an edict for posterity. We have freedom of speech so we post our opinions. I shall continue to do just that. I’m sure you will do the same.
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 3:21 PM | Link to this
Prophetess, shouldn’t we get our money back?
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 3:37 PM | Link to this
Dear @@,12:48
Are you serving fruitcake and Manichevitz at your party? I’ll be right over.
Any way..HAPPY BIRTHDAY..and may you have many many happy ones and great good fortune (without tornadoes).
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 3:41 PM | Link to this
Dusty, you’re dumb as a rock, and you’re an a* to boot. Moreover, the truth ain’t anywhere in there.
You know damn well that you can’t name a “conservative decision” with which I’ve disagreed, and that you can’t find an instance of my insulting the State of Georgia.
You accused me of CA chauvinism, I disproved you. Now you say that the point was GA. I already addressed that ridiculous claim of yours.
Also, my forebears came over with Oglethorpe on his second passage to Savannah. My elderly mother, a Georgian, is DAR. How conservative can you get, without going Birchy?
Like I say, dumb as a rock. No wonder it takes so long to untie your knots and try to answer your twisted questions. I shan’t make the mistake again.
By BadOleBoys
March 15, 2008 3:46 PM | Link to this
Our Incumbent Georgia Republicans would not know conservative if it came up and took a chunk out of them. On second thought, maybe that would be a good lesson in conservatism. Listennow, this chunk represents a reduction in government. It can be matched with a corresponding reduction in taxes. Now let’s see what happens when we take out more chunks. In fact, let’s take out chunks until it hurts.
By Prophetess Kelley P
March 15, 2008 3:56 PM | Link to this
Sorry Glenn. There is no money left to give back. We invested all of our funds in the Pray For Rain StormCenter.
In fact we were all gathered in the Pray For Rain StormCenter during last nights storms that hit downtown Atlanta. We were cheering loudly, praising Jesus as we watched the storm approach the evil downtown area. Many of us Evangelicals had also been praying for the destruction of Godless Atlanta along with our Pray For Rain campaign, and believed our prayers had been answered. It was a time of great joy.
This afternoon or joy turned to sadness. We once again took our places in the Pray For Rain StormCenter as another storm approached. But tragically things took a turn for the worse. Sadly the storms meant for Atlanta headed to the north. Terrible death and damage that were meant for the gays and heathens ended up devastating parts of north Georgia.
Thats when we decided we had to call for a Pray For Rain moratorium. We will re-group and make sure our future prayers center on tornado’s and the destruction of Atlanta. We must make certain that our prayers also include a call for gentle rain and colorful rainbows for the rest of Georgia.
Believe me. We will re-group and be stronger. Your money has been well spent. Please keep donating. We need the money for a new StormCenter yacht where we can monitor the rain safely. Donations can be made at www.ProfitCenter.com. Make checks payable to Christian Angels Storming for Heaven. Or C.A.S.H. for short.
Spirituous
By BadOleBoys
March 15, 2008 4:07 PM | Link to this
Oh great Profit Us, how doth one Cash in on this grand dollar maker. Doth one sell empty bottles for harnessing the all powerful thirst quencher? Doth one package a DVD of Cagles shenanigans and label it “Twister — The Untold Story”?
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 4:15 PM | Link to this
O Prophetess, how Biblical! Your powers are so formidable that you have lost your principality? Astonishing. The ways of the spirit may seem to mis-steer, but they are but mysterious to the cowed. You are so strong. I know that you will weather this storm. If only I had a yacht to offer. My humble suggestion is that you focus your powers next time on climate, rather than weather. Less accountability, and obviously more prophetability. I save my dollars and myself for you, Prophetess!
Hail
By ill bred
March 15, 2008 4:23 PM | Link to this
Anyone notice how the drought is over? Full pool. I went fishing the other day and a Catfish threw ME back. I flushed a low flow toilet today and the water company sent me a rebate. Gosh, Ed, there’s so much rain now, last night I saw a robin hosing his worm.
Gosh Ed, it is raining, eh? (YOU R CORRECT, SIR! HO HO)
By George Washington
March 15, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this
The carriage tax is fair and proper, tis only those who drive fancy dancy carriages that complain about the tax, like them Lexus and Mercedes gluttons…make them pay until it hurts, then make em pay a lot more…
By George Washington
March 15, 2008 4:50 PM | Link to this
I REALLY LIKE THIS POST BY GLENN, SO I AM COPING AND REPOSTING IT, JUST TO ANNOY AND P** OFF DUSTY;
By Glenn
March 15, 2008 3:41 PM | Link to this
Dusty, you’re dumb as a rock, and you’re an a* to boot. Moreover, the truth ain’t anywhere in there.
You know damn well that you can’t name a “conservative decision” with which I’ve disagreed, and that you can’t find an instance of my insulting the State of Georgia.
You accused me of CA chauvinism, I disproved you. Now you say that the point was GA. I already addressed that ridiculous claim of yours.
Also, my forebears came over with Oglethorpe on his second passage to Savannah. My elderly mother, a Georgian, is DAR. How conservative can you get, without going Birchy?
Like I say, dumb as a rock. No wonder it takes so long to untie your knots and try to answer your twisted questions. I shan’t make the mistake again.
By Jackie
March 15, 2008 4:53 PM | Link to this
@Glenn,
Your education dissertation presented to Dusty is an exercise in futility. She is unable to walk and chew and the same time. Your level of exasperation will be elevated.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:01 PM | Link to this
“The carriage tax is fair and proper, tis only those who drive fancy dancy carriages that complain about the tax, like them Lexus and Mercedes gluttons”
Yup. Spoken like a true POS liberal neo-Stalinist demonRAT. Jealousy gets you nowhere in life, POS. Or should I classify those libs that think like you as, say, Nazis, who confiscate that which does not belong to you for the “greater cause?” Uh huh. I like that better.
Hey, check out the latest drum beating from Jimmuh Cartuh’s bestest friend in the world (who also certified his election for you assclown libs in Virginia Highlands), “pigface” Chavez:
“Let them make that list and shove it in their pocket” OOooooo! That POS can’t even keep food in his grocery stores and he’s b!tchin’ about what the US government classifies him as. What a big fat whineyassed baby. He reminds me of liberals…
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:12 PM | Link to this
The">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/andrew_sullivan/article3510778.ece”>The Clintons, a horror film that never ends
Priceless. Except the author forgot one correlation: a black guy does (politically) die in their freakshow flick, and his name is Obama.
Hillary 2008!
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:13 PM | Link to this
Damned tornado…
The Clintons, a horror film that never ends
Priceless. Except the author forgot one correlation: a black guy does (politically) die in their freakshow flick, and his name is Obama.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:19 PM | Link to this
$2,734,343 - tax dollars spent on investigating Wall Street salaries and new laws
$1,322,123 - tax dollars spent on money laundering and prostitution ring probes
$80,000 - personal dollars spent on a high class hooker over time
A Democrat governor getting caught up in the traps he set - PRICELESS.
By AmVet
March 15, 2008 5:19 PM | Link to this
Glenn, as you might guess, I concur with Jackie’s assessment at 4:53. It is completely and utterly useless to attempt logic, and the use of data or facts with those squarely in the “conservative” corner of the round room under the big tent.
Much of the reactionary bilge water that is proffered here, in the guise of “conservatism”, comes from those who as BadOleBoys noted earlier, wouldn’t recognize a conservative if he had lunch with one. (And as you have noted, apparently applies to our esteemed columnist no less!)
An observation that is made frequently here BTW, and which doesn’t help in the cause of a political movement already in staggering trouble.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:24 PM | Link to this
Hmpph. There is a disturbance in The Force. Jacked up Jackie and AmWay the sales weasel are agreeing with “Glenn.” Something stinks here. BAD.
By Jackie
March 15, 2008 5:24 PM | Link to this
Further evidence that the corporate elites are disregarding this country was reported today. Bill Gates of Microsoft Corp said he was pleased some House member introduced a bill to virtually eliminate the H1-B visa provisions for high tech workers. To paraphrase Mr. Gates, “…there are not enough qualified and available workers in this country. The number of graduate students coming to the greatest colleges and Universities in the world for graduate studies should be able to work in this industry.” This is a man that has used the “dumb” American worker to build a billion-dollar empire. There are many, many unemployed software professionals who refuse to work for the $12 dollar per hour being paid to many of those workers from India. The American worker refuses to deal with the management of those workers who are expected to make impossible deadlines and not complain or question their treatment.
The American worker are being told they are uneducated, stupid and have not been a part of the building of the software companies.
By Jackie
March 15, 2008 5:28 PM | Link to this
@Rufus,
I think the thing you smell is your upper-lip.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:30 PM | Link to this
A new study upends the prevailing belief that women in the Middle East are oppressed because of their societies’ adherence to hard-line Islamic teachings. Far more significant in predicting how women will fare in a given country is that nation’s oil wealth. Political science professor Michael Ross argues in a new paper that oil booms put more men than women into the workforce and decrease women’s political representation.
Ok. I get it. When the globe stops using oil, Saudi Arabians and Iranians will return to being carpenters like Muhammad (Peace Be Amongst Him) and stop stoning women to death for being out in public with a man they are not married to or related to. They’ll also stop pre-arranged marriages too I’m so sure.
Can you believe the disease of liberalism?
By Sen Vitter (REPUBLICAN)
March 15, 2008 5:33 PM | Link to this
Thank God. I thought it might have been my dirty diaper.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:35 PM | Link to this
BEIJING Mar 9, 2008 (AP) Chinese police killed alleged terrorists plotting to attack the Beijing Olympics, while a flight crew managed to prevent an apparent attempt to crash a Chinese jetliner in a separate case just last week, officials said Sunday.
Yup. Islamic terrorism is just a damned fakeassed bumper sticker like those yellow ribbons those richassed Conservative Republican soccer moms have on their SUVs.
Hey, you’ve got to give ABC credit here: at least they mentioned the word “Muslim.”
By @@
March 15, 2008 5:37 PM | Link to this
To both Dusty and Glenn:
It’s not my birthday. I was singing without the benefit of musical notes. Mine was a month and one day past.
I’ll accept your fair wishes as belated, and say Thank You today.
ill bred:
I must say, you’ve chosen an excellent name with “ill bred”.
So tell me! When you were conceived - was it gonorrhea or syphilis which can be traced back to “your root?”
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:40 PM | Link to this
“I think the thing you smell is your upper-lip.”
Oh Jacked up Jackie, you are so smart. Where on Earth do you get your wit? Your charm? Your halo? God I wish I could “think” as you.
“…there are not enough qualified and available workers in this country.
Regarding your Bill Gates screed (MS sucks BTW), I would highly recommend looking at our government institutions that you liberals love so much known as public education. Why, when teaching about gays and putting a condom on a banana are more important than learning about math, science, or what our Founding Fathers meant for this nation WTF do you expect to come out of the mold?
By JR
March 15, 2008 5:42 PM | Link to this
HR1246 IS NOT a tax cut. It is a tax swap. The legislature has GUARANTEED the local municipalities that the STATE will replace the tax revenue that that they would be losing via the repeal of the car tax. Are ready for this! Here’s a a little secret, the state gets their money from the taxpayers. I know that may come as a surprise but it’s really true. The STATE will be sending that money back to the locals every year and guess where they will get it from? If you said the taxpayers, the same ones that own the cars and have birthdays, you are correct! This is a joke. It’s not a tax cut, just moving money from one pocket to the other but the pocket always has to be full!
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:47 PM | Link to this
Both [RAT] candidates portray America as a nation where the fruits of economic progress have been usurped by corporate CEOs, equity-fund managers, inside traders and international speculators. Main Street has floundered, while Wall Street has flourished. The annual release of census data on household incomes provides the foundation for the “two Americas” thesis. The latest figures tracked changes in incomes all the way back to 1967. Two observations grabbed the headlines. First, the data indicate that the top-earning 20% of households get half of all the income generated in the country, while the lowest-earning 20% of households get a meager 3.4%. That disparity has widened over time: In 1970, their respective shares were 43.3% and 4.1%. These income-share numbers buttress the popular notion that the “rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer.”
What? You don’t expect a bunch of neo-Stalinist fascist Nazis to tell you the truth, nothing but the truth, and ONLY the truth now, do you?
Of course I KNOW you wouldn’t expect the typical lazyassed liberal democrat voter constituent to actually do any kind of research like this. Why, let’s just sit in an audience like a mindless bot and listen to Shrillary or Barack Hussein lie for votes.
Read the whole article please.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 5:53 PM | Link to this
American public support for the military effort in Iraq has reached a high point unseen since the summer of 2006, a development that promises to reshape the political landscape. According to late February polling conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 53 percent of Americans — a slim majority — now believe “the U.S. will ultimately succeed in achieving its goals” in Iraq. That figure is up from 42 percent in September 2007.
No wonder we don’t hear much about the War In Iraq lately from the b!tchfest libs in the media and elsewhere. Funny how that issue isn’t asked much of Shrillary or Barack Hussein, yes?
By Jackie
March 15, 2008 6:15 PM | Link to this
@Rufus,
I get my education the same place you get yours, thank you.
Now, my wit and humor is not the focal point of this conversation, your thank you. You say that our public education system is not providing those of us that have used it to educate ourselves and our families is severely lacking. That statement begs the question, where were YOU educated? You highlighted what I pharphrased about Bill Gates without understanding that Bill Gates made those statements to bolster his argument about the “ignorant” American worker. I would assume that you are an American that works and has an education from public/private sources. If your educational prowess is diminished, it does not show in your posting. Therefore, I would conclude, you are trying to make a statement with your diatribes that is not supported by the factual presentation of the arguments made. Secondly, why are you introducing the teaching of sex education when the subject was not broached?
By Dusty
March 15, 2008 6:16 PM | Link to this
Glenn,
Sometimes you write so much I don’t think you remember what you wrote. You said you praised Georgia on the Mississippi blog when you talked only about California.
Of course liberals here like your posts. Why not? Look at your posts of today. At 9:13 you wroteIf Sonny Perdue(R) is actually living and is still governing Georgia, maybe the jokes on us.
At 10:15 You complained because of the tax cut discussed today. You don’t like tax cuts.
At 12:08 You called our Republican governor an “empty suit” and accused him of nonfeasance.
At 12:08 You decided this was a liberal country. I disagree. But if “conservatives” of this country act like you, it will be. You did say you wanted to change that. But you should have said you wanted to keep it conservative. See the difference.
You think like a liberal and they like it. You can’t answer a straight question with a straight answer. That is another liberal trait.
Your family history is outstanding. So is mine. But the most conceited thing in the world is to brag about it. I let mine rest in their peace and accomplishments.I am fortunate to have such a family, now and before,and live in this great country of ours.
By AmVet
March 15, 2008 6:22 PM | Link to this
Doofus, sadly (or not) is just another garden-variety, hate-filled, incredibly ignorant and uneducated fake conservative. (That brilliant “analysis” of the “failings” of education notwithstanding).
Newsworthy?
Hardly…
Especially on this blog.
This one, not unpredictably, incessantly whines about the evils of liberalism but for the life of him cannot begin to explain why the “conservatives” got so decimated in the last election. Nor why they are on the ropes again and looking straight into the eye of another electoral bloodbath. Or for that matter, even define what a conservative is.
Bushco may have already ensured that his “conservatives” are going to be in the minority for a LONG time. Again. (Can you say forty years in the political wilderness? Again?)
Speaking of useless, from two of the US Senators who many Americans usually associate with that term:
A bill making its way through Congress brings a rare chance for both sides of the abortion debate to come together in a humane way.
The bill, backed by Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., would create a national registry for families willing to adopt babies born with Down syndrome, spina bifida, cystic fibrosis or dwarfism. It would cost about $5 million.
Will “wonders on demand” never cease.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 6:31 PM | Link to this
“I get my education the same place you get yours, thank you.”
I can guarantee you did NOT, Jacked Up.
“Now, my wit and humor is not the focal point of this conversation, your thank you.”
Yeah, your attempt at “humor” and “wit” sucks like that of most liberals.
“That statement begs the question, where were YOU educated?”
Maybe I went to a private school. Maybe I went to a public school. Maybe I went to a combination of both. Maybe I was (gasp!) HOME schooled. No matter which, that’s NONE of your damned business.
“Therefore, I would conclude, you are trying to make a statement with your diatribes that is not supported by the factual presentation of the arguments made.”
Bill Gates said America is producing idiots (and I agree - the young whippersnappers thinks and vote Democrat-ic). Our nation is rampant with liberalism in government edumacation.
“Secondly, why are you introducing the teaching of sex education when the subject was not broached?”
Pay attention, Jacked Up. I know you are a drooling lib and all that, but PAY ATTENTION FOR ONCE. The subject was “broached” because liberal values are “broaching” on our children’s government edumacation.
Now if the above is not clear enough for you, Jacked UP, I can’t help you with your disease of liberalism. I’m sorry.
And no, I will not contribute to a fund to help your pathetic self.
By Rufus
March 15, 2008 6:36 PM | Link to this
“Doofus, sadly (or not) is just another garden-variety, hate-filled, incredibly ignorant and uneducated fake conservative. “
That’s^^ from the sales weasel AmWay. I’ll decode for everyone:
“Hate” means I say something this buttplunger doesn’t agree with.
“Ignorant” means I say something … err, see above.
“Fake Conservative” means non-liberal.
Just sit back and watch liberal trash like that drool. If nothing else, it’s worth an ACT-III bucket of popcorn.
Bah.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 8:07 AM | Link to this
Oh what a joyous and wonderful election season this has been, a never ending Christmas morning if you will, each day offering a new delightful little surprise:
{{{{Objecting to the tone of attacks against Mrs. Clinton and her supporters on the blog, the diarist called for a “writers strike.”}}}}
{{{{“This is a strike - a walkout over unfair writing conditions at DailyKos. It does not mean that if conditions get better I won’t ‘work’’ at DailyKos again,” Alegre wrote, promising to come back only “if we ever get to the point where we’re engaging each other in discussion rather than facing off in shouting matches.”}}}}
Cannibalism seems to making a comeback, manifesting itself within the demokrat party establishments.
I like it.
~~~~~
Five former soldiers that the AJC chose to help them look back on the 5 year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, look at the message the POS Urinal blared in the bylines under each of their names:
{{{{JEREMY ENGLAND: ‘I just want the soldiers to come home.’ ROGER GRUNEISEN: ‘I want it to end.’ JOSE MERCADO: ‘Everybody comes back different.’ BRETT WATERHOUSE: ‘It was like the war was over.’ JABARI WILLIAMS: ‘The guys knew how to kill.’}}}}
Sounds horrible, don’t it?
Now compare that to the message from each soldier that the POS Urinal buried in the story and isn’t taken out of context:
JEREMY ENGLAND: “I was very proud of what I had been through there. We had gone and we had fought the war and we had done it well and we had survived,” he said.
ROGER GRUNEISEN: “I just hope that we can leave there with some stability knowing that some of those guys died and it actually meant something.
JOSE MERCADO: “It was worthwhile. We did the right thing,” he said.
BRETT WATERHOUSE: Neighborhood residents often came to greet the soldiers with gifts of food, sweet tea and flowers, he recalled…. But now, he said, the war “seems to be going in the right direction.”
JABARI WILLIAMS: It was also a pep talk: “This is all what we trained for. We’re ready now. This is for real,” he told his fellow soldiers.
Isn’t it sick the way these leftist surrender monkies at the Atlanta Urinal will take the words of our brave, honorable soldiers and twist them around to suit their gutless wonder anti American agenda?
Now we all know what Angela Tuck means when she says the Urinal editors “checking the accuracy” of their “news” stories.
Another lie.
~~~~~
Ahhh, the Pinkos look back fondly on one of their happiest times in the Vietnam War:
{{{{ On the 40th anniversary of the massacre of up to 500 unarmed Vietnamese villagers, the former helicopter gunner was reunited with a young man he rescued from rampaging U.S. soldiers.-Urinal}}}}
Notice how the POS Urinal never talks of the hundreds of thousands of brave Americans that have given their lives for the freedoms of France, Korea, Philippines and all the others, but instead dwells on the actions of just a few obvious degenerates?
A puny minority of degenerates out of millions upon millions of honorable men?
These pinkos hate the United States and the good that it represents in the world, make no mistake about it, all you have to do is count the millions of negative stories about our troops that these wormy mofos print compared to the one or two positive ones you see every couple of years.
It is a sickness beyond reasoning, taking advantage of the freedoms given to you by the ultimate sacrifice and bravery, so that you can impugn those that gave their lives for you.
Sick in the head or treasonous, AJC, which is it?
~~~~~
Look at what the Urinal “business” section is calling an indicator of a bad economy:
{{{{MORTGAGE RATES Most recent national average: 6.37% Year earlier: 6.03 percent Danger zone: If it stays over 6%. UNEMPLOYMENT RATE Most recent: 5.2 percent Year earlier: 4.5 percent Danger zone: 6 percent-Urinal}}}}
Klinton administration averages: Mortgage rates- 8% Unemployment rate average- 6%
Anybody else remember how these Klinton economic numbers were called “rosy” and “strong” by these same pinkos?
{{{{News organizations gave Bush consistently negative press about perceived poor job creation and unemployment in the summer of 2004 but their reports were overwhelmingly positive when Clinton ran for reelection in the summer of 1996 under similar economic circumstances. Stories about jobs under Clinton were positive 85 percent of the time, more than six times as often as they were for Bush, despite similar economic data.}}}}
~~~~~
The Urinal’s pathological obsession with “Sunshine Laws” apparently only extends to Republicans:
{{{{Barack Obama has seized the transparency issue, portraying Ku Klux Rodham as “one of the most secretive politicians in America today” for failing to release her tax returns and hasten the release of her White House records.-Urinal}}}}
This little gem buried in a story full of misleading mumbo jumbo, that, instead of answering the real question, goes floating off into nonsense.
{{{{Klinton said she has urged the release of records as soon as possible from the National Archives and Records Administration. “It’s a cumbersome process set up by law,” Klinton said.}}}}
Well, of course, I mean a former president and a “powerful” sitting senator just totally stymied by a law, for the very first time in their lives, I might add.
By ill bred
March 16, 2008 8:25 AM | Link to this
Cynthia Tucker’s take on the Geraldine Gaff shows that attitudes like hers date back to the civil war. Should a woman or a black be the first to vote? Women finally got the vote in the twentieth century. That’s why conservativism is dead. (Sen Craig has sounded taps, with his flag at halfmast).
By jbmlaw
March 16, 2008 8:45 AM | Link to this
Good morning all. Guv’s cryptic comment is beyond strange - I am comfortable that I do not understand his mind at all. This is bizarre in a class with the national socialists proclamation that they will not renew the Bush tax cuts, thus imposing the world’s largest tax increase at a time of increasing risk of recession. Nobody ever said politicians have to be literate in economics; by winning 50% + 1 they prove all they have to prove., i.e., Lincoln’s aphorism about fooling the people.
Note to Glenn, Mrs. jbmlaw has a church meeting after church today, so I too am free this afternoon. How about we split the distance between us? At 1:00 PM I’ll be at the Border’s Bookstore coffee shop, on Ashford Dunwoody approx 1 mile north of I-285. As you may not recognize one who is a cross between Ichabod Crane and Mr. Cellophane, I will dress in my usual post-church attire, blue jeans and tee-shirt. To distinguish myself from the 300 other Borders patrons, my tee-shirt will be canary yellow and emblazoned across my chest will be the phrase, “I hate everyone.” I’ll wait, swilling coffee, until 2 PM in case you get the note late.
By ron
March 16, 2008 9:00 AM | Link to this
Listennow-Let’s pretend that the Junior Senator from Illinois was a man named John Edwards.Would he get an endorsement from Oprah Winfry?Remember that Hillary is still running now,the only change is that John Edwards is in the place of Barak Obama.Would 90%of the blacks in Mississippi vote for him?Would he carry the black vote in the south?Would he now be in a position to carry the Democratic nomination?If by chance you don’t like my person of substitution,feel free to enter your own young,charismatic, inexperienced,white candidate.Would the AJC endorse him?
This is simply an exercise of pure thought,as no situation like this can exist.See what you come up with.Is Geraldine still employed?
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 9:01 AM | Link to this
More eye gouging and hair pulling, isn’t it wonderful?:
{{{{Sen. Barack Obama on Saturday decried “the forces of division” over race that he said are intruding into the Democratic presidential nomination contest.}}}}
{{{{“If all I knew were those statements I saw on television, I would be shocked,” Obama said.}}}}
{{{{Obama suggested that more and more is being made of racial divisions as his contest with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton heats up.}}}}
{{{{“The forces of division have begun to raise their ugly head again,” Obama said.}}}}
Let’s see, the whole entire demokrat organization is made up of “forces of division,” this victim group here, these grievance mongers there, uh, what did you expect Obambi?
Speaking of which:
{{{{The Reverend Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose sermons raging against the U.S. have sparked controversy, is no longer formally tied to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s campaign, an Obama spokesman said late yesterday.}}}}
20 years of hateful sermons against the United States of America, the Jews and whites, it took an outcry to send our spiritual adviser packing.
Will we call it “change?”
By OneForTheRoad
March 16, 2008 9:15 AM | Link to this
If we eliminate the Bush tax cuts, i.e., impose the world’s largest tax increase, what will we have done? Stopped going farther into debt? Conversely, if we were to cut spending, what will we have done? Would we be creating an opportunity to not increase taxes? What would happen if we continue spending at the current or greater rate, send out tax rebates, go into a recession, cut interest rates with the knowledge that this will increase inflation, buy “bad” debt from corporations that made bad business decisions, cut taxes,…? Let’s find out, shall we?
By ill bred
March 16, 2008 9:16 AM | Link to this
My Lai Massacre? There’ve been hundreds of mini-My Lai’s all over Iraq in the last five years. Iraq is Vietnam in the military sense of simply not being able to distinquish friend from foe. My Lai is the story of most wars. Troops in conservative war mode are sitting ducks for guerilla ambush, thus revenge-tactics are the only counter-offensive available. Our own Revolutionary War saw the British committing My Lai after My Lai (my word!) simply because many of their casualties came from the very-successful ambush-and-run tactics of our founding guerillas. Not saying it’s a bad thing, I’m saying it just is. War is My Lai. For good or bad.
Sometimes, the only way to accomplish a mission is to My Lai.
By George Washington
March 16, 2008 9:30 AM | Link to this
LT JMBLAW aka Lt Calley supports massacre as a way of war…works both ways clown, one day it will be your people at the wrong end of the bayonette…
By ill bred
March 16, 2008 9:32 AM | Link to this
The Chinese peititioned the Olympic Committee today to add some new events for the upcoming summer olypmics: Tear Gassing, Tasering, Batoning, and the Hammer Throw at Standing Monks.
By Bored
March 16, 2008 9:35 AM | Link to this
Can’t you just hear the terrorists on board those planes as they head for their intended war targets? My Lai, My Lai…..just another ill-bred plan or a very successful ambush-and-run tactic?
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 9:44 AM | Link to this
Polly: You could search the archives of the AJC for news about the atrocities committed by the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese, atrocities that the victims of numbered in the hundreds of thousands, until you turned purple, you will not find anything.
But yet the pinkos are obsessively consumed over the actions of a few lowlifes while they ignore the heroism of millions.
IT IS AN INBRED DISGUSTING HATE OF AMERICA AND A CRAVEN, OPEN DESIRE TO SEE HER DIMINISHED.
Period.
It is a mental illness, no different than cutting yourself or committing suicide, these panty waist liberals are all ate up with their contrived guilt and are taking it out on the very country they live in.
The greatest and most caring nation in the world no less.
Sick. In. The. Head.
By MYDD
March 16, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this
Entitled
“HOW WE CAME TO BE WHERE WE ARE TODAY”
For fifty years this country has been divided on race. The physical is obvious but the political has been obscured within the democrat party.
How can they [the democrat party] now conveniently claim that it should not be an issue?
Senator Obama claims it should not, but now we discover that Senator Obama has, for twenty years, attended a church whose minister incites his congregation with a message of divide and conquer.
Again, for fifty years the democrat party has carried the dead albatross around its neck, and by his association, not only with his minister, but with the democrat party as well, Senator Obama will be pulled down by the sheer weight of the dead albatross. An attractive trinket worn for their adornment.
They can’t remove it because the knot is too tight.
By ill bred
March 16, 2008 10:14 AM | Link to this
You’re a sociopath who belongs behind barred windows, sir. Your reading comprehension is maybe preK. Obama is going 2B our next president, and it’s driving you crazy, literally crazy, and I think it’s a damn shame.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 10:26 AM | Link to this
Speaking of atrocities:
{{{{Planned Parenthood of Idaho officials apologized Wednesday for what they called an employee’s “serious mistake” in encouraging a donation aimed at aborting black babies.}}}}
{{{{On the recording provided by The Advocate, an actor portraying a donor said he wanted his money used to eliminate black unborn children because “the less black kids out there the better.”}}}}
{{{{Kersey laughed nervously and said: “Understandable, understandable. … Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time I’ve had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I’m excited and want to make sure I don’t leave anything out.”}}}}
Murder for the convenience and benefit of the perpetrator is all abortion is.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 10:31 AM | Link to this
“Klinton administration averages: Mortgage rates- 8% Unemployment rate average- 6%”
“Anybody else remember how these Klinton economic numbers were called “rosy” and “strong” by these same pinkos?”
Well AJCM, I’ll play the liberal devil’s advocate here. You see, back when Klinton was president, all our jobs were here and not overseas (thanks to the NAFTA treaty he signed - remember that giant sucking sound Perot warned us about during the election year debates of 1992?) Ooops, I try to be a liberal and my mind just runs away from me. Anyway, what you will be told after your FACTUAL post is that those low unemployment figures are because the only jobs in this nation are for Burger King. Yes. You heard this liberal RAT well. The ONLY jobs that this nation produces now are for fast food joints. Why, we need a “livable wage” amendment in the US Constitution dammit.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 10:39 AM | Link to this
PLAINFIELD, Ind. (AP) - Sen. Barack Obama on Saturday decried “the forces of division” over race that he said are intruding into the Democratic presidential nomination contest. “We have to come together,” he told a town-hall meeting at a high school.
Anyone else see the irony here? Liberalism IS it’s own worst enemy. These are the same bunch of pathetic liberal RATs who THRIVE on ensuring everyone is divided amongst race, sex, nationality, and most certainly sexual orientation. Liberal RATs divide so they can make each category some sort of “victim” of their own little liberal made up world of misery. Then, they can just put their arms around you, whatever “group” you belong to, and comfort you and say you are a “victim” and will tell you to vote for their politicians to “fix” you problems. Oh, one thing though. If you are a white male/Christian/straight you are sh!t out of luck.
By RW-(the original)
March 16, 2008 10:39 AM | Link to this
While I’m out enjoying this beautiful day would someone, preferably a moonbat(ic)®, explain something to me?
If Super-Delegates are just supposed to follow the will of the people, what’s the point in having them to begin with?
Thank you in advance.
By Bored
March 16, 2008 10:43 AM | Link to this
Some people will even play with themselves when looking for attention.
By Idiots move"O"n
March 16, 2008 10:52 AM | Link to this
In a recent interview with Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Obama said he laments Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s repeated denunciations of the United States in his sermons.
Criticizing what he called ‘inflammatory rhetoric’ by the reverend, the presidential candidate went on to accuse ABC News of ‘cherry picking’ statements issued by a man about to retire.
Wright is no longer on Obama’s spiritual advisory committee.
The Obama empire strikes back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reverend Jeremiah Wright to the young Obama Skywalker.
“Barack, I am your God father.”
Obama tumbles from the sky hitting the earth with a dull THUD!
Ohmmmmmmmmmm
Ohmmmmmmmmmm
Ohmmmmmmmmmm
By getalife
March 16, 2008 11:00 AM | Link to this
RW,
The superdelegates were formed after the antiwar, radical, liberal ,McGovern was crushed in the general.
You see, the American people are very gullible and elected w twice. Look how many are punked by Obama, the radical, corrupt, just another politician, believing his hope bs.
The superdelegates will never vote for a candidate that has his spiritual adviser scream God damn America.
You can thank them for giving us President Hillary Clinton.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 11:03 AM | Link to this
“Some people will even play with themselves when looking for attention.”
PoFO, are you ever going to stop being such a paranoid delusional little left wing freak? Please don’t.
Anyway, from the New Yawk Slimes:
Democrats in Michigan and Florida struggled Friday to resolve the impasse over their disputed January primaries, coming up with a plan to hold a June primary in Michigan while remaining deadlocked in Florida. Reflecting how tense the situation has become, influential fund-raisers for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton have stepped up their behind-the-scenes pressure on national party leaders to resolve the matter, with some even threatening to withhold their donations to the Democratic National Committee unless it seats the delegates from the two states or holds new primaries there.
You just know those asshats wanted to blame the Florida delegation mess on Republicans. Oh wait, the limpwrists on the left already tried. Check out this trash:
Of course, Florida and Michigan Democrats do not see that they are to blame for taking away their voters’ voice in the nominating process.
Funny as hell. These wretched liberal demonRATs eat each other’s babies and blame Republicans.
Like a link I posted here yesterday about the Klintons - it’s straight out of a never ending horror flick.
By jbmlaw
March 16, 2008 11:06 AM | Link to this
Dear One @ 9:15, you raise a couple of good points. (1) “If we eliminate the Bush tax cuts, i.e., impose the world’s largest tax increase, what will we have done? Stopped going farther into debt?” No. Your note reflects that you realize that excessive expenditures are the reason for greater debt, and tax revenues have no effect at all. “Conversely, if we were to cut spending, what will we have done? Would we be creating an opportunity to not increase taxes?” You clearly get it; I wish our leftist friends did. Our leftist friends assume that the economy continues to hum along no matter how much taxes are increased. They do not realize that companies do not pull money out of air. To pay new, larger bills, companies must cut back somewhere. Labor, for most companies, is the largest variable expense. If one has new large bills to pay, where is the most logical place to cut other expenses? And if you know the new expenses are coming, might it make sense to minimize the “unemployment” related expenses by simply not embracing the expense in the first place?
(2) Your last, amusingly-weaving diatribe inquiry also reflects my thoughts - these foolish “tax rebates” will serve no purpose other than to buy votes. The economic effect will be comically small (who will take their $600 rebate and invest that capital in a company?) Far from doing anything that will meaningfully augment the economy, the money will be a waste, and the idea comes from 1970ish Keynesian thought. On the other hand, renewal of the Bush tax cuts would provide an immediate long-term stimulation to the economy - employers would be free to expand employment.
By RW-(the original)
March 16, 2008 11:11 AM | Link to this
getalife,
Now could you step aside and let someone answer my question please?
I agree with what you wrote, but every “news”person I see and quite a few politicians, like San Fran Nan right now on ABC, say that the SD’s need to follow the “will of the people” thus rendering themselves irrelevant.
I sure hope President McCain picks a good VP.
Later!
By ill bred
March 16, 2008 11:16 AM | Link to this
Sen McCain could pick Lincoln for his VP and Obama still would landslide.
By AmVet
March 16, 2008 11:22 AM | Link to this
Good morning all!
What a glorious morning! Everyday is a great one to be alive, but today is going to be spectacular!
With that said, welcome to our local newspaper’s pit of poison known as commmon sense conservatism!
Curly starts out the Sabbath, like EVERY other Sunday here, with his predictable loving and spirit-filled “Christian” tone. You have just got to admire and want to emulate his love for his fellow man and the way he “walks with Him”!
And how his disciples, Christian or not, ape his every slur and enmity filled diatribe.
Isn’t it sick the way these leftist surrender monkies at the Atlanta Urinal will take the words of our brave, honorable soldiers and twist them around to suit their gutless wonder anti American agenda?
I read that article. And his “analysis” leaves much to be desired.
Would it have been more to this “love the sinners” charlatan had the article been entitled “Vets want more of the same and can hardly wait to kill Iraqis for Bush”?
http://newsmax.com/international/vaticanpalmsunday/2008/03/16/80768.html
So the man with the amazing garments yet again appeals for peace in Iraq. That is bound to really p!ss of the blood lusting, armchair warriors in the Republican Party who soldier on (well at least metaphorically!) in this ill-conceived, horribly executed occupation in that geo-politically critical, coincidentally (HA!) oil-rich, once-sovereign nation.
And though I know you Southern Baptist, man-induced global warming proponents loathe the papists, you gotta love this sinner anyway!
*VATICAN CITY — Pope Benedict XVI issued one of his strongest appeals for peace in Iraq on Sunday, days after the body of the kidnapped Chaldean Catholic archbishop was found near the northern city of Mosul.
The pope also denounced the 5-year-long Iraq war, saying it had provoked the complete breakup of Iraqi civilian life.
“Enough with the slaughters. Enough with the violence. Enough with the hatred in Iraq!” Benedict said to applause at the end of his Palm Sunday Mass in St. Peter’s Square.
So enjoy your little Christian love-fest here, Curly and friends.
Pray for rain (but with no tornadoes).
And some redemption…
By WTF?
March 16, 2008 11:26 AM | Link to this
“It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere…That’s the world! On which hope sits!”
And so it went, a meditation on a fallen world. While the boys next to me doodled on their church bulletin, Reverend Wright spoke of Sharpsville and Hiroshima, the callousness of policy makers in the White House and in the State House. As the sermon unfolded, though, the stories of strife became more prosaic, the pain more immediate. The reverend spoke of the hardship that the congregation would face tomorrow, the pain of those far from the mountaintop, worrying about paying the light bill…
Obama’s only trying to distance himself from Wright now because Wright has become politically inconvenient. Not because Obama actually dislikes anything Wright has to say.
We sure as hell know BO was sitting in the pew with this deliverance from the angry Rev. Wright. It was one of his fondest memories in his memoirs.
Freaking liar! How many lies can this mendacious moron expect to get away with before logic prevails and the voters ask WTF?
By getalife
March 16, 2008 11:32 AM | Link to this
Right RW,
pf answered your question.
But then you have McKook’s spiritual adviser screaming to eliminate Islam, 1 billion Muslims and the rapture. Worse than Wright.
They were dead right about seperation of church and State. These preachers owe the IRS billions since they can’t shut their ignorant mouths and are political.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 11:36 AM | Link to this
“You can thank them for giving us President Hillary Clinton.”
One of the resident moonbat(ic)® liberal asshats is still in denial and living in some liberal fantasyland. That’s ok. He’ll have a longer face than John sKerry come November.
Anyway, get a load of the lib media labeling Spritzer as an (R) for Republican. No. I’m not making this up.
Eliot Spitzer (R) holds a news conference in New York City with his wife Silda by his side
Get a load of that mugshot of his wife. She looks like hell. What else would you expect being married to a Democrat? Uh, being married to a snake that is.
By getalife
March 16, 2008 11:47 AM | Link to this
RW,
I think Bernake giving Bear and Stearns 200 billion for bailing them out of the mortgage crises they created is the tragedy of the Spritzer scandal.
Nobody else said a word about this outrage but he would.
BTW, fox does it all the time.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 11:52 AM | Link to this
Allard is a prime candidate to sponsor the amendment — he is retiring from the Senate and there’s no political cost to actually sponsoring $1.4 trillion in Democratic policy proposals.
Huh. Since according to the AmWay the Sales Weasel I’m a “fake conservative” and all that, I surmise that the above by Barack is what a “real conservative” is all about. Ok. Logical and clear as mud.
You ever notice how the liberal RATs whine about Republicans not being “conservative” and then just let their own ilk run like wild animals with OUR money? (Yes, that’s Right. Contrary to what libs will tell you, the government’s money is YOUR money that was taken from YOU).
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 11:56 AM | Link to this
WTF-
“It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere,
You think that clown will mention non-white pirates who are attacking international ships off shore?
http://allafrica.com/stories/200705200011.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4409662.stm
Nah.
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 12:12 PM | Link to this
Testing from iPhone.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 12:27 PM | Link to this
All you mouse potato liberal RAT*s have fun today blogging and bashing The Right. Keep on wasting your pathetic miserable wretched lives, boners. Here’s a CNN video of that fat liberal pig Al Freaken talking about executing Libby for “outing” a covert CIA operative. That clown gets real defensive around the 3 minute mark. Funny how those liberal hate pigs are against the death penalty, even for cold blooded murderers, unless a Republican is involved. The hypocrisy from the kook left is disgusting.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 12:32 PM | Link to this
Now’s a good time to ask- McBushie, would those gutless wonder demokrats really leave us to the tender mercies of al Qaeda or are those just empty, lying kampaign promises like all their others?
{{{{“We were informed that John McCain landed in Iraq Sunday morning. A meeting will take place with the Iraqi government,” said Ali al-Moussawi, an official in the prime minister’s office.}}}}
{{{{McCain was to meet Sunday with Deputy Prime Minister Barham Saleh. Later in the day, he and Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, were to talk. It also was thought McCain would meet with al-Maliki.}}}}
By @@
March 16, 2008 12:40 PM | Link to this
Joy to the world!
Pray for rain (but with no tornadoes).
My joy comes from seeing SHAMVET drop by expecting conservatives to remove “the tornadoes” in his “twisted BVDs”.
“Raining” on his one-man charade they are, and he tires of carrying his brolley (brawley as SHAMVET prefers to call it.)
By jm
March 16, 2008 12:46 PM | Link to this
I wonder if Senator McCain will be welcomed as warmly as the President of Iran was. Interesting that Mahmud Ahmadinejad was able to go out on the street without body armor. I also wonder how many american troops provided security support for that visit.
By getalife
March 16, 2008 12:48 PM | Link to this
For those who still have their sanity:
She does not have a kook, radical, divisive, anti Catholic, rapture wanting, God damn America spiritual adviser.
Just saying.
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 12:58 PM | Link to this
Jbm, have you time to meet?
By AmVet
March 16, 2008 12:59 PM | Link to this
Doofus, that you are not a conservative, nor can even begin to remotely define one, has what EXACTLY, to do with Barack Obama?
(Or ANYBODY else? Take a logic class. Or even an English class for starters. BTW, methinks thou dost protest too much about your supposed education.)
If a knock-off cheap imitation tool like you weren’t serious when you type “conservative” stupidity like that, people would be falling over laughing.
WITH you (not AT you) of course!
McCain’s VP choice is going to be make or break for a lot of independents, moderates, greens, disillusioned Democrats, disgusted Republicans and the ever-popular “undecided”.
So far, so good for the maverick “RINO” who shockingly (and easily) bested all of the posers and assorted whacko neo-con rivals.
He appears to be using a winning strategy - pretending that the far right wing nut jobs/GOP base/”faithful” are relevant. He knows after the past two elections though, that they are as gullible as a four year old at a carnival with cotton candy on the line.
But he knows given the nation’s current temperament and utter disbelief in the “conservatives” these days, they are on the brink of being, once again, back where they belong - on the political outside looking in.
The only real question may be, for how long?
But I believe he is smart enough to know that if he selects one of these non-conservative conservatives as a running mate, the American electorate is going to drop him quicker than a rat can shimmy up a drain pipe.
Then, “conservatives” be prepared to say, “Good morning, President Obama!”
Oh, and @@, FETCH!
By Curious Observer
March 16, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this
“If we eliminate the Bush tax cuts, i.e., impose the world’s largest tax increase, what will we have done?
So the Bush administration provided the world’s largest tax cut—at a time when we had a surplus of half a billion dollars—and we were led to believe that increases in revenue would make up for the tax cut. By Bushbot logic, an increase of $160,000 for every $1.6 billion lost in federal revenue would balance the scales.
Tell us all where we are now, lawyer boy. How’s that great burst of business and federal revenue coming? Lots of jobs around, huh? No problems in the economy, right?
Go back to selling snake-oil.
By jm
March 16, 2008 1:06 PM | Link to this
Glenn@12:58 - this is from jbmlaw’ s post at 8:45 - Note to Glenn, Mrs. jbmlaw has a church meeting after church today, so I too am free this afternoon. How about we split the distance between us? At 1:00 PM I’ll be at the Border’s Bookstore coffee shop, on Ashford Dunwoody approx 1 mile north of I-285. As you may not recognize one who is a cross between Ichabod Crane and Mr. Cellophane, I will dress in my usual post-church attire, blue jeans and tee-shirt. To distinguish myself from the 300 other Borders patrons, my tee-shirt will be canary yellow and emblazoned across my chest will be the phrase, “I hate everyone.” I’ll wait, swilling coffee, until 2 PM in case you get the note late.
Enjoy your meeting
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 1:59 PM | Link to this
{{{{It’s unclear exactly when the primaries stopped being a joyous occasion for the Democrats. But as the weeks have ground on, the intensity between Democrats who disagree has calcified, the vitriol grown fiercer. According to exit polling in the Texas primary, 91 percent of Clinton supporters said they would be dissatisfied with Obama as the nominee; 87 percent of Obama fans said they would be dissatisfied with Clinton. Nationally, a quarter of those who back Clinton say they’d vote for John McCain if Obama won the nomination (while just 10 percent of Obama supporters would do the same if he lost).}}}}
This is as-s backwards to what you would think because if Klintoon wins the nomination it means that she stole it from the legitimate choice of the voters.
But the Obambi cultists would only go for McCain by 10%?
Compared to the Ku Klux Rodham voters at 25%, oh, wait a minute, the klanners can’t vote for the black man, I forgot about that.
Define yourselves, you race hating bigots.
By Jackie
March 16, 2008 2:03 PM | Link to this
@Rufus,
I see that you have chosen to return to give all of us a taste of your profane wisdom.
You stated yesterday that you were concerned about my level of education in the public schools.
I notice that you are able to read and write, with the assumption that you were raised in the USA. The assumptions lead me to believe that either you were educated in the public schools; private schools; home schooled; self-educated.
If memory serves me, you impugned the quality of my education and you tried to add credence to the fact that all of us that were educated in the public system were fascists or neo-Nazis. Further, you stated that the public schools used sexual toys, i.e., condoms on bananas, to teach children, the standard refrain used by those with the mindset that benefits your comfort level. You further stated that the Microsoft operating system was not very good, leading me to believe that you had to obtain education at some time.
Now, with all that said, if the level of education is so bad, why not submit yourself for a lobotomy, erasing all those things that you have learned. You can have the medical personnel give you an osmosis process, wherein everything that needs to be learned will flow across the synaptic gaps of your brain cells and your education would be complete and without the liberal pollution that you abhor.
To conclude my dissertation, I have come to the conclusion that your education is more than adequate and you are not comfortable with the things that you see happening. You have a myopic view of events and believe that you are the only one that has the ability to read, write and comprehend.
Given this items I have stated, why not repudiate your education, quit your job and tell everyone they are stupid. You have the opportunity to start your own software business where you can write your own operating system and put Microsoft out of business.
I am sure that you will have a reply to my posting.
By mean mr mustard
March 16, 2008 2:14 PM | Link to this
good grief, please keep your post down to 3 sentences Jackie.
remember folks.. K.I.S.S.
Just a suggestion…
By TW
March 16, 2008 3:16 PM | Link to this
What’s McCain gonna do in Iraq? Show our guys how to sit in a hole and eat blindfolded? How demoralizing for our troops.
And when are we gonna get a ‘You’re doin’ a heck of a job, Pauly’ out of ‘w’ for all of Paulson’s efforts?
Shame America has regressed to such a cheap sell…
Jan 2009 - an end to THE GREAT REGRESSION
By TW
March 16, 2008 3:19 PM | Link to this
NEWSFLASH
Because the Pope called Iraq a ‘slaughter’, he is now a muslim. Someone call Limbaugh.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 3:20 PM | Link to this
{{{{“Americans love a winner,” Patton growled, “and will not tolerate a loser. Americans despise cowards. Americans play to win - all the time. I wouldn’t give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed… . The very thought of losing is hateful to an American.”}}}}
{{{{Nowadays, the thought of losing a war isn’t as hateful to some Americans as the thought of losing an election. Recall MoveOn.org’s infamous “General Betray Us” ad last fall, which was intended to undercut the commander of US forces in Iraq. Think of Senate majority leader Hairy Reid’s insistence that “this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything,” or Barack Obambi’s unbudging claim that the “strategy is failed” and we must “get our troops out,” or Ku Klux Rodham’s vow that “starting on day one of my presidency, we will begin … to withdraw our troops within 60 days.”}}}}
By TW
March 16, 2008 3:32 PM | Link to this
MoveOn.org’s infamous “General Betray Us” ad last fall, which was intended to undercut the commander of US forces in Iraq.
Surge proved nothing more than that 4 Marines are better than 2 - something most of us already knew.
Where’s the Iraqi government? Oh yeah, that’s what the surge was supposed to….
Morons.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 3:33 PM | Link to this
JW: Well, actually:
{{{{Pope Benedict XVI denounced the 5-year-old Iraqi war and issued one of his strongest appeals for peace in the country Sunday, days after the kidnapped Chaldean Catholic archbishop of Mosul was found dead.}}}}
{{{{“Enough with the slaughters. Enough with the violence. Enough with the hatred in Iraq!” Benedict said to applause at the end of Palm Sunday Mass in St. Peter’s Square.}}}}
{{{{Benedict has called Rahho’s death an “inhuman act of violence” that offended human dignity.}}}}
Do tell, JW, who do you think killed the archbishop?
And I do find it rather amazing that you now see the words of shaman and fantasist, according to most pinkos, to be such an authority now.
Have you been saved?
By mean mr mustard
March 16, 2008 3:40 PM | Link to this
“What’s McCain gonna do in Iraq? Show our guys how to sit in a hole and eat blindfolded? How demoralizing for our troops.” .
Nope, sounds more like the Obama game plan.
I think McCain has a grip on what should or should not be done in Iraq.
.
What’s obama gonna do?
Tell them it’s all a lie, pull out, and see what happens?
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 3:40 PM | Link to this
I got your “government.”
{{{{Those Americans who have sneered at these fits and starts of democracy are experiencing their own domestic political frustrations. Democrats are demanding more political cohesion from Iraq and Pakistan than they’ve been able to manage themselves. As Congress presses for disengagement with no practicable plan, we learn—thanks to the candor of a departing foreign policy adviser—that the leading Democratic candidate has no plan whatsoever for his campaign’s central plank of withdrawal from Iraq.}}}}
By Bored
March 16, 2008 3:41 PM | Link to this
Just got back from enjoying some of the great outdoors. Did I miss anything of value? What was that? {{{{{RuFus}}}}} uses Microsoft Operating Systems. The NERVE! I’m going to report him to AJC Management.
By ron
March 16, 2008 3:41 PM | Link to this
I notice that Sonny is going to visit the tornado damaged area.Everything will be allright now.A visit,a little prayer on the Statehouse steps and God will come down and personally apologise for sending two big winds in one weekend.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 3:49 PM | Link to this
{{{{The song the Rev. Wright won’t sing is by Irving Berlin, a contemporary of Cole Porter, Ira Gershwin and Lorenz Hart, all the sophisticated rhymesters. But only Berlin could have written without embarrassment “God Bless America.” He said it directly, unaffectedly, unashamedly – in seven words:}}}}
“God Bless America
Land that I love.”
{{{{Berlin was a Jew, and he suffered slights: He grew up in the poverty of New York’s Lower East Side. When he made his name and fortune, his marriage to a Park Avenue heiress resulted in her expulsion from the Social Register. In the Thirties, her sister moved in with a Nazi diplomat and proudly flaunted her diamond swastika to Irving. But Berlin spent his infancy in Temun, Siberia (until the Cossacks rode in and razed his village), and he understood the great gift he’d been given:}}}}
“God Bless America
Land that I love.”
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:00 PM | Link to this
Well, when the cat is away, the RATs will play. For AmWay the sales weasel:
“Doofus, that you are not a conservative, nor can even begin to remotely define one”
Isn’t that special? I’m for low taxes, a strong military, government meddling NOT in my financial matters (uhm, that means no estate and capital gains taxes for you liberal freaks in Virginia Highlands). Liberalism is a low-rent ideology.
“BTW, methinks thou dost protest too much about your supposed education.”
Two things here. First, how can I “protest” about my education and what in the world kind of purpose would that serve? Only a liberal would come up with such nonsense. Second, I never mentioned about my level of education or where I obtained said education. If it makes you feel any better liberal child, I’ll just go spit it out for you and save you a drooling insult, oh wise lib one: I got it out of a Cracker Jack box.
“Then, “conservatives” be prepared to say, “Good morning, President Obama!””
Weasel – I think we all know what you stand for here. Absolutely NOTHING other than socialist liberalism. Your veiled attempt at labeling conservatives and NOT real conservatives while touting the wonders of Obama are laughable. No, methinks in your liberal world you are right and everyone else is wrong. Or, to be more blunt as you drooled earlier, “full of hate.”
You are a fool and constantly make a fool of yourself here. But that’s ok. At least you are good at something, lib.
By jbmlaw
March 16, 2008 4:02 PM | Link to this
Dear jm @ 1:06, thanks for your help, Glenn made it to the meeting, and only because of your assistance. We’ll have to invite you to our next coffee break.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:07 PM | Link to this
Now it’s your turn, Jacked Up Jackie:
(Do you liberals EVER get out of the house?
“You stated yesterday that you were concerned about my level of education in the public schools.”
If you go back and look at that post, I remember making fun of your pathetic attempt at humor. YOU were the one that brought up education, lib.
Here, I’ll rehash it for you:
Oh Jacked up Jackie, you are so smart. Where on Earth do you get your wit? Your charm? Your halo? God I wish I could “think” as you.
Do you see anything there^^ about an educational slam? You know, one of the many problems and character flaws of you liberals is that you read into things that are not there. Further, you people just LOVE to dish it out, but cannot take it in return. When that happens, as AmWay the sales weasel stated in his/her keyboard vomit this morning, it’s all about “hate.”
“If memory serves me, you impugned the quality of my education and you tried to add credence to the fact that all of us that were educated in the public system were fascists or neo-Nazis.”
Jacked up, you definitely have issues. My reference to Nazis was at 5:01pm yesterday with confiscating things that do NOT belong to them for the “greater cause” you liberals love so much. Go read it again. Second, go back and re-read my 5:40pm. I said government education is failing America, as Bill Gates indirectly stated. Now you tell me you liberal idiot, WHERE do I talk about YOUR education?
“You further stated that the Microsoft operating system was not very good,”
Sigh. Liberals and their emotions get in the way of clear thinking every time.. I said Microsoft SUCKS. Does that mean their OS sucks? Their bullying tactics and their Gestapo tactics of authorizing software are why a lot of people have turned to open source code such as Linux. By the way, I will say this about their latest OS though: Vista is going to be the shortest lived OS to come out of Redmond. A replacement, currently called Windows 7, is slated for 2010. Further, when Dell continues to offer XP on their laptops and desktops, MS has failed miserably. Oh, and I won’t even bring up the success of Mozilla.
“Now, with all that said, if the level of education is so bad, why not submit yourself for a lobotomy, erasing all those things that you have learned.”
Now you are drooling, Jacked Up. I am referencing the CURRENT education system AGAIN, as Bill Gates referenced in YOUR original post. Besides, why the hell would I want to reformat my brain and become a mindless liberal like you?
“To conclude my dissertation”
You mean DIATRIBE, don’t you? Thank GOD…
“you are not comfortable with the things that you see happening.”
Au contraire, Jacked Up, I am PERFECTLY happy with my life. I cannot control things happening AROUND me other than voting and I accept that. You liberals on the other hand are hell bent on “changing” people to think like you. It is so evident in all of your ilk’s postings here and elsewhere.
“You have a myopic view of events”
That’s laughable coming from a liberal who HATES the idea that someone is out there that doesn’t agree with THEM. Just look at you pathetic liberals on this blog. You are CONSTANTLY calling for Jim’s retirement and that this blog is worthless. Then you idiots sit here and fester day in and day out about how Conservatives are horrible and against “real” America. You liberals RATs have the level of hypocrisy that Republicans and Conservatives could never touch.
“You have the opportunity to start your own software business where you can write your own operating system and put Microsoft out of business.”
That’s a joke, right? Why would I want to start my own business when it will just get taxed to hell and back and FORCED into hiring union employees? That’s what you disgusting libs want for businesses in this nation.
“I am sure that you will have a reply to my posting.”
I hope I didn’t disappoint, Jacked Up Jackie the lib.
By getalife
March 16, 2008 4:07 PM | Link to this
God damn w, the gop and their ilk would have been the wright thing to preach.
I hear that Newt is preaching that we need to unite to save our country.
He should call for w and cheney to resign but did not have the guts to man up.
Man up or STFU Newt. It was you and your party, so practice you preach and hold w and cheney accountable.
By AmVet
March 16, 2008 4:16 PM | Link to this
Roofies, must you always show your horrific lack of comprehending standard written English? ALWAYS?
Is it possible that you truly mistake if for putting words in other peoples mouths? I swear you, like some sort, of modern day Nazi, do.
Show where I’ve ever touted Obama. Tool of Fools. Go ahead. Any time. Anywhere. EVER. Can’t be done, you deluded male Dusty. (For you GG!)
I’d vote for him when hell froze over.
Yes, you have made it abundantly clear that you, like your fighter-pilot hero of Alabama, favor an interventionist military run by imperialists and no government intervention in YOUR financial matters (i.e. paying no taxes whatsoever, but reaping ALL of the benfits of this wonderful country as you suck off the American teat).
And it is obvious you are also a “social conservative” who favors no government interference in people’s private lives excluding on the issues of outlawing abortion, gay marriage, right to a dignified personal death (think Terry Schiavo), etc, etc, etc…
So yes you are a supposedly educated, never-served, never-will, Bush apologizing neo-con. But don’t cry too much. You still have a few months left to celebrate your uniqueness…
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 4:18 PM | Link to this
jm @ 1:06,
Thank you very much for the heads-up. We managed not to miss, and actually resolved to permit Barack Obama to become POTUS.
(Yes, I’m kidding.)
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:18 PM | Link to this
Just What Did Obama Know About Wright’s Past Sermons?
The only thing more beautiful than watching the liberal RAT party tear itself apart at the seams is watching the lib media pick sides and attack. You have GOT to love it!
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:28 PM | Link to this
More keyboard vomit from the sales weasel:
“Show where I’ve ever touted Obama. Tool of Fools. Go ahead. Any time. Anywhere. EVER. Can’t be done, you deluded male Dusty. (For you GG!). I’d vote for him when hell froze over.”
I’m sure everyone here would expect you to slam Obama should he win the election for the RAT party in November.
You aren’t fooling anyone, sales weasel.
“And it is obvious you are also a “social conservative” who favors no government interference in people’s private lives excluding on the issues of outlawing abortion, gay marriage, right to a dignified personal death (think Terry Schiavo), etc, etc, etc…”
Now I challenge YOU: where have I stated ANY of the above issues in MY POSTS HERE? Go ahead, AmWay, SHOW ME THE MONEY BABY!
“So yes you are a supposedly educated, never-served, never-will, Bush apologizing neo-con. But don’t cry too much.”
Like Bill Klinton, I chose college over military service. You got a problem with that Weasel?
Finally, the only crying on this blog is with you pathetic liberals b!tchin’ about Conservatives not being Conservatives.
Ok, your turn now Weasel for more keyboard vomit…
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 4:29 PM | Link to this
AmVet, I thought word had come down from the gargoyle that Rufus and I are supposed to be the same blogger. I’m OK with that; more so than with a new legend of the Two Rufi.
By AmVet
March 16, 2008 4:30 PM | Link to this
One last thing before I go.
Dufus says he wants a strong military.
By that does he mean stretching it to the point where guys have to return to Iraq three, four, five times.
Does he mean gutting the reserves and the ANG by sending them overseas to fill slots.
Does he mean implementing edicts like stop loss orders and forced extensions in country.
He “favors” a strong military where his bony, punk a* never has to participate.
He, in fact, shows derision for veterans with terms like Amway.
Let’s face it, gutless boys like him don’t give a flying fu
He only loves George Bush’s politics and chosen war and hates anybody who doesn’t.
He in fact, is not even worthy of wearing the uniform, and for him to even attempt to speak of things she knows not a single solitary thing about, like sacrifice before self and code of honor is repulsive.
And that is why these creeps are going to get decimated again in November…
Have a great week chickenhawk.
By TW
March 16, 2008 4:32 PM | Link to this
NEWSFLASH
The Pentagon said this week that there was no conncection between Iraq and Al Qaeda prior to 9/11. That makes The Pentagon muslim. Somebody call O’Reilly.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:34 PM | Link to this
THE Government has apologised to 200 Muslim inmates at Armley Jail who were offered ham sandwiches during a holy festival. Jack Straw, the Minister for Justice, who is in charge of the nation’s prisons, has admitted in a letter seen by the YEP that a “regrettable administrative error” led to the blunder and has ordered bosses at HMP Armley to be more diligent.
Well that’s just a damned shame. Has anyone ever investigated why these Muslims are in jail? I’ll bet it’s more than turning over cars and torching them in an unemployment protest.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:39 PM | Link to this
Well don’t cut-n-run from me, AmWay the Sales Weasel! I was just getting warmed up. Damn that’s too bad. You call me “doofus” then you b!tch about me calling you “AmWay.” For someone who allegedly served, you have NO SPINE. I’m not impressed at all. But, you are a liberal, so I’m not surprised at all either.
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 4:39 PM | Link to this
TW @ 4:32,
The Pentagon said this week that there was no conncection between Iraq and Al Qaeda prior to 9/11.
And who said “The Pentagon said” so?
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this
Hundreds seeking housing money overwhelm Boca Authority
Well what do you know about that. A near riot breaks out over people trying to get housing vouchers. Here’s an original thought: rent an apartment if you can’t afford a home, or better yet, if you CAN afford a small home, don’t LIE on your application. And liberal Democrat[ic] politicians, please don’t lobby to financial institutions for the “poor” and “underprivileged” for mortgages any more, Otay?
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 4:48 PM | Link to this
{{{{Women may be at risk of mental health breakdowns if they have abortions, a medical royal college has warned. The Royal College of Psychiatrists says women should not be allowed to have an abortion until they are counselled on the possible risk to their mental health.}}}}
{{{{This overturns the consensus that has stood for decades that the risk to mental health of continuing with an unwanted pregnancy outweighs the risks of living with the possible regrets of having an abortion.}}}}
Yeah, no kidding, there must be the bodies of too many abortion patients killing themselves to continue sweeping under the rug.
The thing that gets me, how can an unwanted child cause “mental health” problems?
Is selfishness now a mental health issue?
How about irresponsibility, does this cause you to be considered a nut case?
By Bored
March 16, 2008 4:49 PM | Link to this
WOW! {{{{{Rufus}}}}} is even more boring than last weekend. The AJC Management wishes to remind {{{{{Rufus}}}}} that there can be only one AJC Management and {{{{{Rufus}}}}} is not it. The AJC Management also wishes to remind {{{{{Rufus}}}}} that he is still allowed to use the 1st Amendment to the same extent as all other bloggers. {{{{{Rufus}}}}} may now return to being boring.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 4:59 PM | Link to this
““Then, “conservatives” be prepared to say, “Good morning, President Obama!”””
That^^ was AmWay at 12:59.
“Show where I’ve ever touted Obama.”
That^^ was AmWay at 4:16.
I told you liberalism was a mental disease. They can’t even keep their own stories straight.
By TW
March 16, 2008 5:00 PM | Link to this
Good afternoon Glenn, last of the conservatives!
Thought I read something about a report, please excuse me if I was wrong.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:06 PM | Link to this
“WOW! {{{{{Rufus}}}}} is even more boring than last weekend.”
Huh?
PoFO: I heard the Dominican Republic has some pretty good hoot. Whatever that nasty crap you are smoking is clearly not working for you. YOU, my friend, need a “change.”
By @@
March 16, 2008 5:07 PM | Link to this
Getalife:
You’re getting a little carried away with Reverend Wright’s declaration to America don’t you think?
It’s out of character for you.
I am MissAppointed.
By Bored
March 16, 2008 5:13 PM | Link to this
Yes indeed. Now that’s the boring {{{{{Rufus}}}}} I’ve come to know and be bored by. The AJC Management wishes to thank you for occupying space. The AJC Management said that the empty space was getting a bum wrap. People were starting to call it boring.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:14 PM | Link to this
WOW is Bristol cool or what? Tony “The New Mullet” Stewart gets spun out by Harvick (another prick) with three laps to go. Like the Democrats in November, victory was snatched by the jaws of defeat. (Think about that analogy, libs).
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:18 PM | Link to this
By TW March 16, 2008 5:00 PM | Link to this Good afternoon Glenn, last of the conservatives!
Well I’ll be a flea on a RAT. I told you all yesterday something stinks to high heaven on this blog.
(Yeaaahhh Jeff Burton!)
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:22 PM | Link to this
“Yes indeed. Now that’s the boring {{{{{Rufus}}}}} I’ve come to know and be bored by.”
I’m sorry PoFO, did I miss the part where someone has a Springfield Armory .45 pointed at your head forcing you to read this blog?
You poor thing.
By Bored
March 16, 2008 5:24 PM | Link to this
{{{{{Rufus}}}}} is lapping up a boring spill. Yawn. The AJC Management longs for the return of the less boring empty space that {{{{{Rufus}}}}} now occupies.
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 5:28 PM | Link to this
Hi TW. Yeah, you did, we did, read of the report, but I didn’t take it at all the way you (and, as I recall, CNN) reported it. That’s why I was asking who reported it that way, the way you had it.
You had it that “The Pentagon said this week that there was ” Whereas when I heard it on the news and looked into it online, there was this big disconnect. The Pentagon didn’t say it; someone else said it to the Pentagon, and the Pentagon released what they said. Was that release a release of “a Pentagon report”? No. First of all, strictly speaking it was not a “report” but rather an outside analysis (of seized al-Qaeda docs) that is to be reported (which simply means delivered) to the Pentagon, which has decided to “report” the analysis, in turn, to Congress this week. The analysis was not generated by DoD, but rather by a private contractor. The analysis expressly does not represent the Pentagon’s views, much less does it constitute “a Pentagon report”. Moreover, the analysis itself has not been released by DoD; only portions of the redacted, classified analysis have been released. The analysis, according to its authors, is intended to stimulate discussion.
Does the analysis find “no connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda prior to 9/11”? The portions of the analysis released to the press make no such finding. The corporation that made the analysis does say, in the released portions, that the captured docs submitted to them by DoD do not establish a “direct operational link” between the Hussein regime and al-Qaeda pre-9/11. Direct link to al-Qaeda operations.
I see nothing here that contradicts President Bush on the relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda before, and then after, 9/11. What this story does contradict: the facts of the provenance, development and contents of the “report”; the carefully massaged urban legend that W claimed that half the reason we should invade Iraq was that Iraq, with al-Q, was behind 9/11.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:29 PM | Link to this
“The AJC Management longs for the return of the less boring empty space that {{{{{Rufus}}}}} now occupies.”
Well then PoFO, you highly intelligent liberal RAT you, why don’t you make like Rush and exit stage left?
By Bored
March 16, 2008 5:32 PM | Link to this
The AJC Management wishes to release {{{{{Rufus}}}}} from its mindless control experiment. On the count of one, {{{{{Rufus}}}}} will be released from his desire to post more boring dribble. One. Did it work.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:38 PM | Link to this
COLORADO SPRINGS — Applications for concealed-weapon permits have skyrocketed in Colorado, with the increase fueled by everything from heavily publicized mass shootings to routine renewals, according to the state’s sheriffs.
In 2007, 9,880 people statewide sought permits, compared with 6,649 people in 2006 and 6,670 people in 2005, according to the County Sheriffs of Colorado. And the surge has continued into 2008 in several counties. Law-enforcement experts have different ideas on why more people want to carry concealed weapons. Some believe it is due to a rash of violent outbreaks at Virginia Tech, Northern Illinois University and a mall in Utah.
No. No. No. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. You idiots in Colorado are supposed to not own any guns and just dial 911 when some piece of human trash is committing a crime against you. The cops will be there for you - eventually - if you can get through the government run 911 system.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:42 PM | Link to this
PoFO: I guess not. I told your punkass your weed was bad.
By Hugo Victor
March 16, 2008 5:42 PM | Link to this
Rufus, you wrote: “I told you liberalism was a mental disease.”
Specifically, that disease would be Compulsive Civil Control Psychosis, or CCCP. CCCP is a highly particular psychopathy currently afflicting more than a third of all adults in this country–—no fewer than 80 million Americans: the 72 million affiliated with the Democratic Party and the 8 million who have cast their ballots for John McCain in this presidential election season. No minor behavioral disorder, CCCP is a progressive illness that, left untreated, builds inexorably toward a debilitating state.
By TW
March 16, 2008 5:44 PM | Link to this
Glenn - excellent. Thanks. Perhaps the Bush admin should send it’s CDC monitors over the the Pentagon.
HOW BOUT THEM DAWGS!!!
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:49 PM | Link to this
“Compulsive Civil Control Psychosis, or CCCP”
Very nice! I especially like the Cyrillic Russian influence there.
Speaking of progressive, Stalin touted being a progressive as well.
But we all know where the disease of liberalism has its roots.
By Bored
March 16, 2008 5:50 PM | Link to this
The AJC Management wishes to explain to {{{{{Rufus}}}}} that he is boring. Since he is the result of a failed mindless control experiment (One. Last try, did it work.), the AJC Management wishes to take this time to be bored as well. The AJC Management must apologize to all for being subjected to {{{{{Rufus}}}}} and we hope that ever more readers will not become as bored as bored. Please let {{{{{Rufus}}}}} know that he is boring but also remind him that he is free to use the 1st Amendment as much as any other blogger (He likes to be reminded of this fact.). This may eventually accomplish that which “One” was unable to accomplish.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 5:56 PM | Link to this
TORONTO, March 14 (Reuters) - A series of winter snowstorms that blanketed Eastern Canada through February cut into existing home sales for a third straight month, the Canadian Real Estate Association said on Friday. Sales in Canada’s major markets fell 6.4 percent in February from January, to 26,588 units, according to CREA, an industry trade organization representing over 90,000 realtors.
Leave it to the Canadians to not blame their housing slump on global warming. Or Bush. Wait a minute. Did that even make any sense? Oh good grief. I’m sounding off like a liberal.
By Hugo Victor
March 16, 2008 5:57 PM | Link to this
Rufus, it is actually quite tragic, and misunderstood. Although CCCP is often misdiagnosed as Quality Control Compulsive Disorder (QCCD), it is in fact far more aggressive and resistant to treatment. Whereas those with QCCD have a pronounced need to locate and control quality in whomever they may find it, patients with Compulsive Civil Control Psychosis are impelled to control whole populations, as well as disaggregated demographic cohorts. And while both pathologies are marked by compulsive disorder, it is CCCP which manifests the complete symptom complex classically associated with psychotic mania: the disordered thought processes and clouded judgment, the hyperactivity and impulsive spending, the grandiosity and overreaction grossly disproportionate to exogenous events, the exaggerated sense of persecution or victimization.
But the hallmark of CCCP is of course the patient’s inexhaustible and excessive involvement in endeavors aimed at managing the lives, lifestyles and worldview of others. Those afflicted with Compulsive Civil Control Psychosis are almost always unaware that there is anything wrong with their behavior or attitude toward society. On the contrary, they are most often impatient, intrusive, meddlesome and, when interfered with, threateningly irritable. Whether they imagine themselves “independent” or “moderate”, in reality they brook no interference with their felt need to indulge liberally in overweening and debilitating human husbandry.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 6:01 PM | Link to this
“The AJC Management wishes to explain to {{{{{Rufus}}}}} that he is boring.”
[Breaking out my liberal decoder ring]
That means that “I don’t have the mental capacity or knowledge armament to refute, debate, or discredit what ‘Rufus’ says on this blog.”
Again, I told you liberalism was a mental disease. Sucks to be them I suppose.
Not that I give a RAT’s a* about liberals and liberalism.
By Glenn
March 16, 2008 6:01 PM | Link to this
FREE TIBET!
BOYCOTT THE BEIJING GAMES!
By Bored
March 16, 2008 6:04 PM | Link to this
{{{{{Rufus}}}}} never ceases to bore. He is becoming progressively more of a bore. In fact, he is far from a conservative at boredom. He is truly most liberal with his boredom. The AJC Management wishes to remind {{{{{Rufus}}}}} that he should not apply such liberal doses of boredom. The AJC Management wishes for {{{{{Rufus}}}}} to think about what is right. Don’t be a bore and we won’t snore.
By AJC Management
March 16, 2008 6:04 PM | Link to this
{{{{Iraq will hold a two-day conference of all political groups starting on Tuesday to promote national unity and help defuse sectarian tensions, government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said Saturday.}}}}
{{{{The conference, which begins just two days before the fifth anniversary of the US-led invasion, will be organised by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to achieve “security, reconstruction and complete sovereignty,” Dabbagh said.}}}}
{{{{“Different political leaders will be present and the conference will aim to activate the role of different groups in the political process for positive contribution and national reconciliation,” he said in a statement.}}}}
Just by speaking those words, the Iraqis have accomplished more this year than the whole entire demokrat party has.
Bwa.
After all, the Code Pinkos are working on their national disunity.
By @@
March 16, 2008 6:10 PM | Link to this
I’ve read at numerous sites that within the body of the text Zawahiri was, in fact, mentioned. This is an abstract from “The Trumpet”.
After reviewing 600,000 Iraqi documents seized since the beginning of the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, the Pentagon released a report last week saying it had “uncovered strong evidence that links the regime of Saddam Hussein to regional and global terrorism.” An abstract in the appendices of the report describes the connection between Saddam and the al Qaeda network this way:
Captured Iraqi documents have uncovered evidence that links the regime of Saddam Hussein to regional and global terrorism, including a variety of revolutionary, liberation, nationalist, and Islamic terrorist organizations. While these documents do not reveal direct coordination and assistance between the Saddam regime and the al Qaeda network, they do indicate that Saddam was willing to use, albeit cautiously, operatives affiliated with al Qaeda as long as Saddam could have these terrorist–operatives monitored closely.
Anyone here is welcome to verify if they want.
Old news as far as I’m concerned.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 6:11 PM | Link to this
Huh. I guess Jackie didn’t like my response. Oh well. There’s always next week where we’ll all see the heroes of the left like Jacked Up Jackie and AmWay the sales weasel “own” the blog again with their hate screed against Conservatives and Republicans. Yep.
By Rufus
March 16, 2008 6:30 PM | Link to this
Three simple rules for newbie bloggers:
1) If you post as a Conservative, you are full of “hate” here.
2) When liberals bash Conservatives here, it’s okay. You are supposed to sit back and take it and not retaliate.
3) Should you get too uppity and continue to fight the disease of liberalism, you will get personally singled out and bullied by the resident liberals that can’t seem to stay away from a Conservative blog.
Any questions?
By Newbie
March 17, 2008 8:29 AM | Link to this
I have some questions. What’s a “Rufus”? Is that someone’s pet? Or someone’s pet’s toy? Or someone’s pet’s toy’s stuffing? Is the pet house broken? Did it hike its leg on its toy or squat on it?
By ill bred
March 17, 2008 8:47 AM | Link to this
Rufus = Bored. The same moron posting 2 himself 24/7 is Andy Duhng. Yes, he’s quite mad, you know. I have to apologize to the AJC readership because it was I who creamed him so bad years ago when he was even more obnoxious. He became unhinged with just one post, (and I was kidding), that turned him into the wonder of modern science you dont read today. So sorry, I was just doing a bit, and he fell for it. Remember when I teased him about using italics? and he stopped using them? See what I mean? Cant take a joke. Sometimes, though, I really wonder if andy isn’t wooten. Wooten writes very constrained, almost handcuffed, and it would make sense that he would have an alter-ego that was so over the top, you know, like Dr. Jeckle and Mr. Heckle.
Maybe. Probably not. Look, I got my post-doctorate in pre-med, and I’m not one for being ignoble, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that the problems of two little morons dont amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world.
Here’s kookoo kachu, kid.