Thinking Right

By TW

May 31, 2007 8:25 AM | Link to this

Dittos Jim – they should have outlawed science after the dinosaur hoax…

By ckt

May 31, 2007 8:43 AM | Link to this

Jim-

As an environmental engineer at GaTech, I am constantly dismayed at every rightwingers favorite line, “the scientists are split.”

If there is ONE thing I can tell you about climate change and global warming, it is this: “SCIENTISTS NOT BEING FUNDED BY EXXON ARE NOT SPLIT.”

Stop repeating Rush’s talking points for him - its unbecoming of you.

By harold

May 31, 2007 8:48 AM | Link to this

what scientists are split?

is laura mallory a scientist?

or do you mean the republicans are split from the scientists?

or are there a few scientists on the payroll at the chemical factory going “nope, nothing we do is a problem”

jim do you wanna poke holes at scientific theories or would you rather go outside for a jog along peachtree and realize on your own that the air is all farked up

harold cant understand why people choose partisanly to perpetuate industry that kills them. where is the benefit? keeping Mr Plastics rich?

By TD

May 31, 2007 8:49 AM | Link to this

National Energy and Environmental Policy, Jim? We already have one of them. Dicky Do Cheney, Kenny Boy Lay, et al, decided the NEP for us. Maybe it is time that someone else wrote us up a new one. Their’s certainly isn’t working for the consumers of this country.

By jbmlaw

May 31, 2007 8:53 AM | Link to this

Good morning all. As a professing Christian, I am loath to trash the religion of another – and unthinking belief is the essence of the current global warming campaign. It is the coming apocalypse, where evil man destroys the world due to his worldly desires. The only cure is to sacrifice all of our conveniences, and to punish ourselves with less.

You all get the argument, you’ve heard it before; no reason for me to belabor the issue. I am with Vaclav Klaus on this one. My belief system is that man lacks capacity to destroy the earth, which sets me opposed to those who would constrain my freedom, in order to honor their god of global warming

By DebbieDoRight

May 31, 2007 8:54 AM | Link to this

When did Jim become a scientist? Are the republicans buying degrees online again?

By DebbieDoRight

May 31, 2007 8:57 AM | Link to this

harold cant understand why people choose partisanly to perpetuate industry that kills them. where is the benefit? keeping Mr Plastics rich?

Nope; it’s called keeping Jimmy Boy rich as Croseus until he dies, (that way he can afford healthcare for his deteriorating lungs)…..he’s got stock in plastics…….

By TD

May 31, 2007 8:57 AM | Link to this

Am I wrong in my remembrance that even Exxon Mobil and BP have now stated that Global Warming is real and that man is part of the problem?

By harold

May 31, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this

jim isnt a scientist. he is a blog troll!

jim is a troll on his own blog!

harold guesses thats what the republicans have come to. they are caricatures of their former selves. they are the old lady wearing two pounds of blue eye shadow!

remember when california used to burn every summer? then florida and arizona started? and now georgia too?

By Realist

May 31, 2007 9:02 AM | Link to this

Bravo JBM! Great Post!

When the alarmists and hypocrits who preach to us about global warming stop driving cars and flying in jets, I will begin to beleive that they are sincere about mans contribution to the impending doom. Until then, I will beleive that at least for today, the sky IS NOT falling.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 9:04 AM | Link to this

I have seen lists of engineers and scientists on both sides of the fence. What makes this an Republican issue. Most environmental bills and Federal parks where passed by Republican presidents and Congress. Do you think Republicans want to breath dirty air. I believe we need to strike a good balance between the environment and industry. Wounder why we are paying over $3 per gallon for gasoline?

By cmd

May 31, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this

Not only the oil companies… (including Chevron) …. even the Bush Administration has said that man is to blame for climate change.

It’s sad when fusty old people endanger the futures of the younger generations and their children - much easier to be mocking, self-congratulatory and selfish rather than take a thoughtful and educated look at the problem. Typical.

By TD

May 31, 2007 9:13 AM | Link to this

By jbmlaw

May 31, 2007 8:53 AM You all get the argument, you’ve heard it before; no reason for me to belabor the issue. I am with Vaclav Klaus on this one. My belief system is that man lacks capacity to destroy the earth, which sets me opposed to those who would constrain my freedom, in order to honor their god of global warming

jbmlaw, even using your logic and your premise that only God has the capacity to destroy the earth, could it not be possible that God is sending us a message in the hope that man will get the message before God has had enough of man’s mismanagement of his earth and does something about it himself? He has certainly done it before, has he not jbmlaw?

By gtfan

May 31, 2007 9:13 AM | Link to this

Thought the new word was ‘climate change’ b/c of the cold winters that occured this year.

Anyway, I heard ‘Scientists’ say Neptune’s been warming up for the last 25 years. Does Al Gore have a mansion on Neptune, and fly back and forth from there on his private plane?

Or is that where his carbon emmission credits are being deposited?

By Dave

May 31, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this

I am very suspicious of Global Warming. Why? Because the politicians are making a bog deal of it.

You don’t see them making a big case about the missing honey bees, which is a huge issue.

We live in a society that distorts statistics, funds biased research, staffs our schools with activists rather than educators and we get this as a result.

I am highly susicious of the motivations of ALL scientists.
They have lost their credibility by selling objectivity.

Do I care if this means the end of the world? No not really. I know that if God wants it to end, then it will end.

We are not the ones in charge here and the sooner we realize that, the more we can focus our energy on something we can change, ourselves.

By Anonymous

May 31, 2007 9:17 AM | Link to this

Anyone with a PhD in climate research, please raise your hand.

Everyone else, admit you’re not qualified to comment on this and move on.

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 9:19 AM | Link to this

Just 16% Believe Senate Bill Will Reduce Illegal Immigration Wednesday, May 30, 2007

There’s a simple reason the immigration bill being debated by the U.S. Senate is unpopular with voters—the general public doesn’t believe it will reduce illegal immigration. And, in the minds of most voters, that’s what immigration reform is all about.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 16% of American voters believe illegal immigration will decline if the Senate bill is passed. Seventy-four percent (74%) disagree. That figure includes 41% who believe the Senate bill will actually lead to an increase in illegal immigration.

If voters had a chance to improve the legislation, 75% would “make changes to increase border security measures and reduce illegal immigration.” Just 29% would” make it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the country and eventually become citizens.”

Voters who believe that the current bill will succeed in reducing illegal immigration favor its passage by a 51% to 31% margin. Those who believe the bill will lead to even more illegal immigration oppose its passage by a 70% to 12% margin.

Overall, despite a major push by the President and others over the past week, support for the Senate bill has not increased at all. In polling conducted last night (Tuesday, May 29), 26% of voters favor passage of the bill. That’s unchanged from the 26% support found in polling conducted the previous Monday and Tuesday. Forty-eight percent (48%) of voters remain opposed.

Eighty-one percent (81%) of American voters are closely following news stories about the issue, including 37% who are following it Very Closely. Those with the highest interest in the issue oppose the legislation by a 3-to-1 margin (69% to 23%). By a 55% to 15% margin, those following the story Very Closely believe the bill will lead to increased levels of illegal immigration.

Unaffiliated voters are now more opposed to the bill than either Republicans or Democrats. Among those who don’t identify with either of the major parties, 22% support the Senate bill while 57% are opposed.

Some supporters of the bill have tried to suggest it is politically popular by citing polling data for selected features of the bill. However, President Bush yesterday implicitly acknowledged the strong public opposition to the bill by stating that elected officials will need political “courage” to pass the measure. Senator Jon Kyl (R), a major supporter of the legislation, acknowledged in interviews that the lack of support measured by Rasmussen Reports is an accurate reflection of the public mood.

Rasmussen Reports polling, like that of other firms, has found that Americans may be willing to accept a compromise proposal that includes legalizing the status of the 12 million illegal aliens already living in the United States. Sixty-five percent (65%) said they would accept such a compromise provided that it accomplished the primary goal of reducing illegal immigration. However, arguing about the nuances of amnesty, guest-worker programs and other provisions will do nothing to build popular support without proof that the government is serious about controlling the border.

Seventy-two percent (72%) of voters believe it is Very Important for “the government to improve its enforcement of the borders and reduce illegal immigration.”

Many times, voters doubt that reasonable alternatives exist. But, 68% of Americans believe it is possible to reduce illegal immigration while just 20% disagree. A New York Times/CBS News poll found a similar result—82% believe the federal government could do more to reduce illegal immigration.

The belief that the issue could be addressed adds to the frustration of those who oppose the Senate bill. Sixty-six percent (66%) believe it doesn’t make sense to debate new immigration laws until we can first control our borders and enforce existing laws.

By zeke

May 31, 2007 9:22 AM | Link to this

Typiical left wing anti individual socialist, and, yes democrat, drivel proclaim man is destroying the earth! What crap! The climate was much worse in the middle ages and ancient times. The oceans were much higher, 300 feet or higher. Scientists have recently discovered that the New Madrid fault in Missouri was caused by ancient oceans. Climate change has occurred in various cycles over the history of the Earth without industrial activity. Did man cause it? Of course not. This is a natural phenomenon of the cycles of the planet. For these alarmists to think that humans are so powerful that they can destroy the Earth or the vast galaxies of space is pretty conceited and absurd. We may cause severe damage with vast nuclear explosions, but, I seriously doubt we can destroy what we cannot fully understand how it came into existance!!!!

By Peter

May 31, 2007 9:22 AM | Link to this

HA HA HA Jim…off course you don’t worry about global warming……. heck as long as the administration changes the data like always, we will have zero problems.

Since you want to stick your head in the sand, and ignore the problem, you will be happy to know as it becomes dryer in our region, there will be allot more sand for you to bury yourself in!

By RCH

May 31, 2007 9:22 AM | Link to this

gtfan Heard the same,also mars is getting warmer. Might the cause be the sun is getting warmer?

By Astronomer

May 31, 2007 9:22 AM | Link to this

The planet Mars has been warming for years. This week the news comes out that the planet Neptune is showing evidence of planetary warming. IT’S THE SUN STUPID!!!! There’s nothing we can do about it. Our solar system is going to do whatever the hell it wants in spite of us insignificant carbon-based life forms that inhabit the paper-thin crust of the third rock from the sun!

By Aquagirl

May 31, 2007 9:23 AM | Link to this

I agree with Vaclav Klaus too. Man can’t destroy the earth. We can, however, make it uninhabitable by the human species by our own actions. The earth existed without humans for millions of years, and can do so again quite nicely.

If this is okay with you, then you are obviously a Republican.

By JEEEEZE

May 31, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this

By Dave

May 31, 2007 9:14 AM Do I care if this means the end of the world? No not really. I know that if God wants it to end, then it will end.

This is the kind of ignorance that insures man’s demise. Just stick your head in the sand so you can’t see it coming at your posterior. But I guess it is true that ignorance is bliss. Enjoy your blissful ignorance Dave.

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this

Bush’s detention facilities

Houston-based KBR, formerly the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton Co., has a contingency contract in place with the Department of Homeland Security to construct detention facilities in the event of a national emergency.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, spokeswoman Jamie Zuieback confirmed yesterday in a telephone interview that the KBR contract for $385 million was awarded initially in January 2006 for a one-year base period with four one-year options. It has been extended into 2007. KBR held a previous emergency detention contract with ICE from 2000 to 2005.

Zuieback told this writer the primary intent of the KBR contract was to build temporary detention facilities that could be used in the event of a mass migration across the border that required ICE to respond on a quick basis to an illegal-immigration crisis.

“The idea of the KBR contract is to support the Army Corp of Engineers,” Zuieback explained, “in case we experienced a sudden mass immigration and we had to respond quickly. We would need immediate detention facilities in the form of temporary housing that would enable us to determine if the large numbers of illegal immigrants were political or economically motivated, or if they were criminals or terrorists.”

Zuieback confirmed that the KBR contract for detention facilities could apply to national emergencies, including natural disasters.

Several times, Zuieback insisted in the telephone interview that the KBR contract was a “contingency contract,” specifying that detention facilities were to be built only when an immigration emergency or a national emergency, including a natural disaster, had been declared.

Heather Browne, spokeswoman for KBR, also sent me an e-mail yesterday confirming KBR built a temporary facility in New Orleans that provided cantonment for up to 500 federal detention officers who were tasked with maintaining law and order during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

Last week President Bush on May 9 signed a little-reported National Security and Homeland Security Directive (NSPD-51 and NSPD-20) that granted extraordinary powers to the president in the event of a declared national emergency, apparently without congressional approval or oversight.

NSPD-51/HSPD-20, published on the White House website, rescinds Presidential Decision Directive 67 signed by Bill Clinton Oct. 21, 1998, and establishes a new White House office of the National Continuity Coordinator, a position now occupied by Frances Fragos Townsend, the assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Terrorism.

The new directive concentrates an unprecedented amount of emergency authority in the office of the president, specifying that the president now has the authority to direct “National Essential Functions” of all federal state, local, territorial and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations in the event of a national emergency.

The directive loosely defines “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.”

The KBR contingency contract appears to give ICE the ability to have detention facilities constructed under the president’s direction in response to a national emergency as declared under NSPD-51/HSPD-20.

The initial White House press release announcing the presidential directive included no background explanation of the directive or statement by the president. The press release merely posted NSPD-51/HSPD-20 on the White House website.

Sections 23 and 24 of NSPD-51/HSPD-20 specify that Annex A and the classified Continuity Annexes are incorporated

By DaVinci

May 31, 2007 9:28 AM | Link to this

Why are you so negative about science Dave? Did a scientist tell you that the earth is more than 6000 years old? What a moron.

By harold

May 31, 2007 9:29 AM | Link to this

it aint about destorying the earth

its about destroying the life on earth

including us. we are alive, currently

the red alert smog days every summer are just make up like the terror alert right?

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 9:29 AM | Link to this

Global Warming

If some environmentalists are to be believed, we are on the verge of massive global climate change which will see a significant rise in sea levels, chaotic weather patterns, and catastrophic droughts all caused by small increase in global average temperature.

This site provides links to resources skeptical of those sort of doomsday scenarios. The articles linked to here are written by a wide variety of people, from scientists to laypeople, and their inclusion here should not be read as an endorsement of their positions.

Just as when dealing with things coming out of the environmentalist camp, you need to use your brain and decide for yourself to what extent global warming poses a threat to humanity.

numerous scholarly hard science based articles are available here:

http://www.skepticism.net/faq/environment/global_warming/

By Keep God out of it

May 31, 2007 9:31 AM | Link to this

Dave,

You are the primary reason people hate Christians. You just resign the cause of all worldy events to God, thereby avoiding any personal responsibility to share the stewardship of our planet with the rest of us “earthly” secular folks…

Well sorry dude…I”m not waiting around to see if your God has decided it wants to destroy the planet.

Opiated, head-in-the-sanders like you are the reason that the Government ultimately will (and it’s gonna happen) force us to do the things necessary to keep the planet livable.

You relics, including Jim Wooten, have missed the train…

And to Jim Wooten..you are so obsessed with partisan politics that you can’t see past the end of your nose…you freely admit that mankind could be affecting the weather but it’s just not important because it’s an agenda…idiot.

By scott

May 31, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this

Most of the split in consensus is not about whether humans are contributing to climate change, but more about how. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an international group of SCIENTISTS (not politicians with an agenda) says there is at least a 90 percent chance that humans are contributing to global warming. Science is about facts, and the facts are that humans are contributing, and the human population is growing exponentially. Those two realities alone should be frightening to anyone, regardless of political ideology. Just because a politician made a movie on the subject does not mean this is a political agenda. Here’s the agenda – the earth is warmer than it has ever been (fact), humans contribute to global warming (sorry, it’s not disputed), and the human population is growing exponentially. Stop passing the buck and start doing something about it.

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this

Global Warming is not caused by carbon dioxide

just one of numerous extremely detailed hard science articles that debunk the hysterical lies of the global whiners:

http://nov55.com/gbwm.html

By FED_UP

May 31, 2007 9:35 AM | Link to this

JIM YOU TRULY ARE AN IDIOT

By getalife

May 31, 2007 9:39 AM | Link to this

OMG, it is not about PeachCare but does show Jim could care a less about future generations.

As long as he is not stuck in traffic, global warming os okay by him.

Geez.

By DebbieDoRight

May 31, 2007 9:41 AM | Link to this

Typiical left wing anti individual socialist, and, yes democrat, drivel proclaim man is destroying the earth!

Man can’t destroy the earth huh? Well, let’s look at the long laundry list of things that man has either destroyed, drove to extinction, or is in the process of destroying:

Europe: Caspian Tiger, Panthera tigris virgata (1960s, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, southwest Russia, Crimea (possible))

Caucasian Moose, Alces alces

caucasicus (1810, Caucasus Mountains) Caucasian Wisent, Bison bonasus

caucasicus (1927, Caucasus Mountains)

Carpathian Wisent, Bison bonasus

hungarorum (1790, Carpathian Mountains)

Corsican Pika, Prolagus corsicanus (1800, Corsica, France)

Cretan Dwarf Megacerine, Megaceroides cretensis (Crete, Greece)

European A* or Encebra, Equus hydruntinus (1400s, Spain)

European Lion, Panthera leo europaea (100 AD, Greece)

Irish Elk, Megaloceros giganteus (c.5000 BC, Ural Mountains)

Majorcan Giant Dormouse, Hypnomys morphaeus (Majorca, Spain)

Majorcan Hare, Lepus granatensis solisi (1980s, Majorca, Spain)

Minorcan Giant Dormouse, Hypnomys mahonensis (Minorca, Spain)

Minorcan Giant Lagomorph, (Minorca)

Portuguese Ibex, Capra pyrenaica lusitanica (1892, Portugal)

Pyrenean Ibex, Capra pyrenaica pyrenaica (2000, Spain)

Sardinian Dhole, Cynotherium sardous (Sardinia, Italy)

Sardinian Giant Shrew, Nesiotites similis (Sardinia, Italy)

Sardinian Lynx, Lynx lynx sardiniae (Sardinia, Italy)

Sardinian Pika, Prolagus sardus (1800, Sardinia, Italy)

Tarpan, Equus ferus ferus (1880, Poland)

Not to mention the Rain Forests, DoDo Bird, etc. The list is endless……

By Copernicus

May 31, 2007 9:41 AM | Link to this

So the wingnuts are using the “it’s only the sun getting hotter” argument while conveniently leaving out the part where the ozone layer that protects us from the sun has gotten thinner, equating to higher temperatures here on earth. So if the sun keeps getting hotter and the ozone layer keeps getting thinner, guess what folks? The imbecillic right never, ever, finishes the equation. They just continue down the path to their own destruction with their ignorance as the guide.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

Scott Then why have the last 5 winters in this decade been the coldest in 100yrs. If it is true that humans are contributing to global warming, why is Mars and Neptune getting warmer.If we do contribute it is a small drop in the pool. If you remember the eruption of Mt. St. Helen. It did more damage than all mankind throughout the ages.

By Adam

May 31, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this

The common thread through of the various sky-is-falling “crises” that crop up such as millineum computer catastrophes, environmental disasters, Snail Darter emergencies, etc is they all require massive regulatory intervention by those who are infinitely smarter than the plebes.

Leftist democrats are always eager to follow any self appointed “expert” who steps up and declares the need for drastic and immediate action. Logical thinking always conflicts with their emotional reactions and therefore must be dismissed as ignorance. Follow the hype of world renowned scientist Al Gore, inventor of the internet, and he will show you the way.

By Copernicus

May 31, 2007 9:52 AM | Link to this

Remember folks. These naysayers are the same folks that gave Oral Roberts money to build a tower to heaven so that God wouldn’t kill him. They are the same folks that kept Jim and Tammy Faye Baker up in fine style. They are the same folks that think Benny Hinn can heal them through their TV screen. They are the same folks that use local weather as refutation. Consider the source folks. Once you do that you know it is futile to rationalize the truth to them.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

Copernicus Maybe you have forgotten that the ozone is not a permanent fixture. Rather it shifts location constantly. That is why certain parts of the earth have periods of colder and then warmer climates. Still,since there is no disturbance by man on these other planets why are they getting warmer?

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

AS there is NOT the slightest tiniest bit of evidence that I have EVER SEEN ANYWHERE that actually proves the existence of any kind of god it is absurd to make unsupported fideistic assertions invoking such superstitious nonsense. Anyone can claim anything they like and cloak it with dogmatic religious bollocks, but happily these days this kind of simpering (just for you harold) intellectual ‘clerical’ dishonesty carries less and less credibility and resonates only in the already unthinking, lets stay blissfully convinced circles.

Sadly the intolerant mindless regimented evils of the old Spanish papist Inquisition are now being perpetrated again. But this time its the malevolent hysterical post modern puke of the lemming like global whiners who screech from their fule guzzling limousines and Lear Jets and lately from their horrendously polluting Prius’s that the sky is falling. Seemingly only these eco whacko scum have the right to twist and lie and gleefully distort the actual science involved, and that’s where their dumbasshit wide eyed lefty arses get a factual environmental kicking.

By jabster

May 31, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

Why does all the talk about global warming inevitably lead to talk about SACRIFICE? Is THAT the goal of the watermelon crowd (green on the outside, red on the inside)? Bringing down capitalism and keeping people from living just a little bit larger?

I have 37 CFLs throughout my house and my light bill is running about $30+ a month lower over last year. No sacrifice there. I don’t drive a car bigger than my needs (and am paying for it on a TWO-year loan). No sacrifice there. But I WILL run the A/C as cold as I darn well please!

I’ll live simply so that others can simply live…only when Algore gives up his McMansion and leaves some carbon credit indulgences for the rest of us.

Maybe there is something to global warming. But with penance and indulgences, it sounds like a religion to me.

I agree with Bjorn Lomborg—when global warming is projected to be a problem 100 years from now, we’ll be getting all of our energy needs from some clean “Mr. Fusion” type source. Think back 100 years. Atlanta had a vehicle emission problem back then too. At least CO2 doesn’t smell and get all over your shoes. Instead of fouling the air, it fouled the water. People got sick and died from cholera and other waterborne illnesses. Oh the humanity!

By Adam

May 31, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

Hey DebbieDoRight - since you are so informed in all aspects of species extinction, what was the role of Man in:

Cretan Dwarf Megacerine, Megaceroides cretensis (Crete, Greece)

European A* or Encebra, Equus hydruntinus (1400s, Spain)

European Lion, Panthera leo europaea (100 AD, Greece)

Irish Elk, Megaloceros giganteus (c.5000 BC, Ural Mountains)

Too many gas guzzling SUV’s in the Ural Mountains around 5000 BC?

By Carl

May 31, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this

Based on my Google research I am convinced that anyone that says they are absoulutely convinced one way or the other on golbal warming is taking a biased stance. The one interesting research report I read looked at climate and temperature change over a 400,000 year span. Clearly their are climate cycles. An intersting tidbit from that report stated the following.

“It is remarkable that over the last 400,000 years, the maximum of the yearly average of the temperature exceeded the present values by just 1 to 2 °C (average temperature on earth was then 16 to 17 °C compared to 15 °C today).” Meaning cooler.

All that being said man definitely needs to be a better steward of our environment. I know from my families perspective less gunk in the air would be beneficial from a health perspective.

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

the racist crackpipe debbieturd also seems to have glibly missed out how the black afriKan Bantu movement south butchered and enslaved the pygmies, eventually wiping them out with devastating racist genocidal efficiency.

By Copernicus

May 31, 2007 10:13 AM | Link to this

Well RCH, using your logic, maybe God is trying to send a message to the entire universe before he lights her up. LMAO!

By Bruce

May 31, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

Congrats, you have provoked a dialog about global warming. You’re right others are wrong. Others are right and you’re wrong. As an active Atlantan of 40+ years I’ve watched the climate changes in my fair city. I’ve seen the changing weather patterns and they’ve all been for the worst. Call it global warming; call it cyclical; call it a warning and a whisper. If we don’t change how humans use the earth, we will accelerate the death of this planet. Another Man’s opinion.

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

the racist crackpipe debbieturd also seems to have glibly missed out how ITS OWN WONDERFULLY SOPHISTICATED ANCESTORS the black afriKan Bantu movement south butchered and enslaved the pygmies, eventually wiping them out with devastating racist genocidal efficiency.

By Aquagirl

May 31, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this

True, there is a lot of argument over global warming and a lot of it is politically tinged. Mostly by idiots who think because Al Gore flies in a private jet, then we can all do whatever we want and basic scientific principles won’t apply.

Look at it this way: if the evidence of human influence on the earth’s climate is only (for the sake of argument) 20% likely to be correct, isn’t that still significant? If I told you there was an 80% chance that a careening car wouldn’t hit your child, wouldn’t you still do what you could to get them out of the way? The stakes are pretty high.

By melo

May 31, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

Bush did not use the INTERNETS when he became President. Typical Republican ignorance of anything thats new and science driven. He uses it now. Same with global warming. Now he understands that man can cause harm to the earth if development is not managed properly.

I guess we still have work to do to convince the remaining knuckle heads who are our fellow earth citizens. JIM,u are not a scientist and no scientists are split. You repeat that line because it is comforting to your ignorant senses! Some of u need a sponsored trip to some Third world countries, like Brazilian amazon for example. That way u can see the light.

By FBI

May 31, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

By deport the illegal leeches now, another of Andy’s aliases. You can tell a crackhead a mile away.

By KC

May 31, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

Hey “deport the illegal leeches now”

Anybody who read your linked article debunking man’s CO2 output as a contributor to global warming I hope took to the time to read the “About The Author” section. He’s a Microbiologist who does MUSHROOM RESEARCH on a “farm in the midwest”. Hmmmmm….yep, scientists are split. On one side there are climatologists and atmospheric specialists with thousands of years of training and experience between them. On the other side we have mushroom researching microbiologists who believe all the other scientists (who obviously won’t let them into their treehouse) are in some Skull and Bones type secret organization who’s only purpose is to scare the bejeezus out of us and get us to fund their research. Because, you know, if it weren’t for global warming there wouldn’t be much left for scientists to do.

I say we just blame it on Clinton.

Have a great day everybody!

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

KC and the Sunshine tw ats…

that was the very first article linked in a google search … funny how you also ignore all the articles in that other skeptics.net link I posted.

I also note that you have NOT factually refuted any of his points - just lamely and hysterically smeared him for not being a climatologist.

also try junkscience.com

And given that many of the lefty eco whackos “scientists” who signed that paid for infamous global whining “petition” in the NY Slimes a year or so were not climatolgists but chemists, engineers and psychologists and the like - none of whom have any climatology expertise - I naturally assume you were as contemptuous of their partisan lack of subject knowledge as this seemingly very well informed mushroom chap.

dishonest lefty wankers like you need to be deported!!!

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Not being a scientist and all, I just know that when I see satellite photos from 10 years ago and satellite photos from the present that I see a large loss of landmass to water. Maybe all you right wing chritiofreaks need to use that pipeline to God you all have at ready and tell him he needs to stop pouring all that water out of that big boot up there before he makes all of you look really stupid. Tell him straight up that it’s getting harder to convince folks not to believe their lying eyes down here on planet earth.

By jabster

May 31, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this

So, let’s say that all of the scientists aren’t just marching in a liberal P.C. lockstep and are all 100% right. What is going to save us? Penance, hairshirts, flagellation, indulgences, and we-are-not-worthy self-denial? Or technology?

Technology is the answer. We need to start an “Apollo/Manhattan” type project to find a source of CO2-free energy, stat. I applaud Richard Branson’s Virgin Fuels effort in this regard.

Sure, there will be winners and losers, from the inventor of some future “Mr. Fusion” to the cashier at the QuikTrip. Always will be. We just need to grow a pair and not coddle those whose businesses may be rendered obsolete.

What we DO NOT need are liberal posers that want us to sacrifice so they can have more for them and their two-faced lifestyles.

This can be a real win-win for most people (excepting those who are stuck in the fossil energy business)—maybe finally resulting in energy too cheap to meter.

And, before someone blames our current situation on “technology”, I want them to give it all up first. No cheating! No fair blaming something that has been a tremendous net gain for the human condition.

By AC

May 31, 2007 11:11 AM | Link to this

When I was a child we were told that another Ice Age was around the corner. Seems to me that going from Ice Age to Global Warming is quite a difference in the evaluation of scientific data. For me, when the weather experts are able to accurately forecast tomorrow’s weather, I’ll pay a little more attention to their forecast for next century’s weather.

By Southern Democrat

May 31, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

We have a huge problem with the environment and global warming. It is caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

We have a huge national security problem. It is because of our involvement in the Middle East. This is, in large part, due to a need for fossil fuels.

It’s not just environmental, it’s economical. We’re Americans. We solve problems. Let’s build more nuclear reactors, triple our investment in efficiency for alternative energies in cars, and join Kyoto to help make carbon emissions trading a profitable enterprise for Americans. We then use soft power to force India to join Kyoto in exchange for an increase in enriched uranium and technology. China will, eventually, follow suit, and if they don’t? That doesn’t decrease our own responsibility to be stewards of the earth and leave our grandchildren clean air, water, and land.

A Republican (Nixon) and Democrat (Clinton) enforced tighter regs on industry, but now the EPA is powerless (see Christie Whitman for details) and is intimidated by big business. It will take popular support to ensure enforcement.

By GLOBAL WARMING ALERT

May 31, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this

A STAGE II GLOBAL WARMING ALERT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE FOLLOWING COUNTIES: …CHEROKEE, CLAYTON, COBB, DEKALB, FULTON, GWINNETT, HALL and ROCKDALE…..

…A STAGE II GLOBAL WARMING ALERT has been issued by the Global Warming Czar…Global Warming induced fires have covered a large portion of south Georgia…Smoke from fires has created a hazardous condition…Heat and drought index at record high…

WARNING: …Bring ALL pets inside… Small children and people with breathing problems should stay in air-conditioned rooms… AVOID OUTSIDE CONTACT…Do outside chores and errands at night if possible…

SUNBLOCK ADVISORY: SEVERE CANCER RISK

OZONE WARNING: HAZARDOUS

OXYGEN/BREATHING CENTERS: OPEN

COOLING STATIONS: OPEN

HEAT INDEX: SEVERE

DROUGHT CONDITIONS: CRITICAL

WATER RESTRICTIONS: Total outdoor watering ban. 1 Bath per week per person.

For more information please visit the Global Warming Emergency Response Authority at gwera.gov/czar/ALERT

Please check with your local school system for school closings.

By Dusty

May 31, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this

Aw geee let’s fight about the weather etc etc

Of course humans are warming the earth. We breathe, build fires, run motorized inventions, and rub two sticks together and sometimes two people together to produce heat.

So let the techies write papers and get grants. Let the liberals stop breathing, And for goodness sake, get Al Gore off the air. I had to cut him off last night. “Now let us talk about the world’s GREATEST problem!!! was his first sentence. He forgot to mention his lack of winning elections which is HIS biggest problem. But woo hoo…it’s getting hot!!

By Dave

May 31, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this

*JEEEEZE *

There is a big difference between having your head in the sand and realizing that there is simply NOTHING a single person can do about it.

So what can you or I do specifically that is going to change this? The point above that you did not quote is my mentioning that you can only change yourself.

No I do not have my head in the sand, but at the same time I am not going to worry about it. Why spend so much emotion and energy on something you cannot change. No matter how much you want to, you cannot change what is going to happen.

Take a deep breath and let go of it, all the people in your life will be affected by this anger if you keep holding onto it.

By deegee

May 31, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this

Back in the sixties and seventies we heard a lot of resistance from industrialists when factories were ordered to stop polluting rivers with toxic waste and to control their emissions. Companies that wanted to do so stayed in the US and complied. Those that didn’t want to spend the money to clean up moved overseas or closed up shop. While we undoubtedly benefit from clean air, rivers and lakes, there is a price to pay.

Scientists are taking the lead on climate change and I don’t think that they are being alarmists. The people in this country need to have an intelligent debate on the topic and force a national environmental and energy policy. We will no doubt pay a price that will include lifestyle changes. Left up to our elected leaders it will never happen. We must force the issue from the bottom up and keep it front and center.

By jm

May 31, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this

Weather patterns have always been cyclical. There are enough examples of “100” year storms out there to refute “man-made” climate change. However, I believe it is folly to believe that humans are having no impact on the climate.

Then again, when the earth is tired of having humans at the top of the food chain, it will get rid of us, just like it did the dinosaurs and give some other species a chance to be on top.

By GWB

May 31, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this

I guess you won’t be watching much TV after the 08 elections when Al Gore becomes the 44th pres of these United States, will you Dusty?

By jbmlaw

May 31, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this

Adam @ 9:46 and Jabster @ 10:48 said it better than I can, but that will not keep me from trying also. The leftists do this regularly, claiming to be the high priests, as a means of retaining political control over their brothers. (“There is a serious problem, and only I have the solution. Give me the power over you.”)

Dear Copernicus @ 9:52 and Melo @ 10:22, I remind you that leftists led the campaign to ban DDT, leading to the unnecessary deaths of millions, mostly in backward third-world countries in sub-Saharan Africa, for no good reason. Leftists imposed the moratorium on nuclear fission plants, thus ensuring union jobs in the coal industry (and amusingly exacerbated their current distress over global warming.) Leftists prohibit the sale of Freon purportedly due to “ozone damage” surfacing coincidentally just as the DuPont patents expire, to ensure that DuPont’s profits are preserved by its patents on the new and only reasonably workable industrial substitute for coolant. Wrong on all counts, but if it cost lives, fortunes, and freedoms of individuals, that is a small price to pay to ensure the continuing socialist control over our lives.

Dear TD @ 9:13, I think you are right, but for the wrong reasons. The god I worship is a god dedicated to the freedom of his creation. The history of man is a history of enslaving people for their thoughts, e.g., the Inquisition 500 years ago, or the current and indistinguishable non-debate on causation of global warming. Does the truth ever emerge? Of course it does. YHWH is found, not in the bombast or violence of the clamor, but in the quiet truth that ultimately is manifest. I urge you to be wary of those who claim that god compels us to change our ways, and “only I know how you need to change.” This is purely an issue of faith: do you believe the high priest/scientists who think the taxpayer/sucker needs to fund more research in their fields, or is this merely another case where we can be content to allow the market to clear, rather than to urge move government constraints? I am content to trust markets.

Dear Anonymous @ 9:17 and Aquagirl @ 9:23, unlike you, I am unwilling to yield my freedom to a cabal of self-anointed experts.

Dear Harold @ 9:29, no, it is about destroying freedom on earth.

Dear KGooi @ 9:31, you are the primary reason people hate agnostics, most of whom strike me as pleasant people otherwise. By elevating man to the position of god – master of the universe – you create unreal expectations and grant unrealistic omniscience. The arrogant misperception of omniscience is the ultimate “Achilles’ heel” in leftism/ socialism. For a well-reasoned agnostic view contrary to yours, check out the note by our friend dtiln @ 9:53.

Dear Southern @ 11:14, I was with you until you magnified the wisdom of Kyoto. Just another deal assembled by the card-sharks.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this

Southern Democrat Obviously you don’t know anything about the Kyoto. This is exactly why it was not voted for in the U.S. If you build a nuclear power plant to displace the usage of 100k barrels of oil, this does not count to your mandated consumption of fuel oil. You could build a million nuclear plants and do away with all consumption of fuel oil and still be in violation. Explain that!

By jabster

May 31, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

Why do I need to change my lifestyle? Particularly when technological solutions exist (or are on the immediate horizon) where I don’t have to?

I am not going to change my lifestyle just to satisfy someone’s personal need for penance by proxy. I am NOT playing a role in someone’s personal “sacrifice Kabuki theater”.

Consider yourself warned…if nobody else is looking out for me and my family I am fully prepared to do it myself.

By Dave

May 31, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

*DaVinci * Actually I am far from one of these fundamentalists who think the earth is 5000 years old. That was a subject of interpretation by a couple scholars who were flat wrong.

Carbon 14 dating is a good measure of time.

Not all religious people believe the same thing and an ad hominem attack like yours is infantile and does not further your argument or credibility. A few readers who agree with you might be moved to agree, but that’s only an emotional reaction.

I find both science and religion important and I am not criticising science, because the scientific method is not being properly followed in this case.

There is no such thing as a proven fact or consensus in science. Scepticism is necessary and integral in science.

The closest you can get to “fact” in science is statistically significant.

But the marriage of today’s science with politics is a perversion of science due to political beliefs and financial incentives.

Science and religion are 2 parts of the same whole even though many extremists on either side want to keep them separate.

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

And obviously you know everything about everything don’t you RCH? LMAO! ROFL!

By TW

May 31, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

jbmlaw - having tamed the God of Christianity, how long will it take your god of mammon to domesticate that of science?

By Southern Democrat

May 31, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

Jbmlaw,

I understand your feelings towards Kyoto, it’s (in its current iteration) a flawed system. I do think, however, the idea born from the Montreal Protocol and continued through Kyoto of having an emissions trading market is one in which we could profit enormously.

We have a weird situation currently where we have U.S. states signing on to a set of principles and rushing to fill a gap left by a do-nothing EPA (which still receives billions of taxpayer funds) and the rest of the federal government.

The irony here, of course, is that (akin to the immigration debate) we already have the laws in place. It is an issue of enforcement. The EPA, being granted Chevron deference, chose to ignore its responsibilities until it recently got smacked by the conservative court. We need drastic enforcement now and a Kyoto-like carbon trading system allows it to be economically sensible for us.

By kevin mccarey

May 31, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

Wooten’s comments on global warming prove once again that “common sense conservatism” is an oxymoron.

By David

May 31, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

Today’s news … from an NPR interview. (http://rawstory.com/news/2007/TopNASAofficialnotsureabout0531.html)(http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/Story?id=3229696&page=2) To the priests of the religion of global warming … in the tradition of science, why don’t we just evolve and adapt? Why must we change our behavior? Wouldn’t Darwin just want us to evolve and develop larger sweat glands?

By RCH

May 31, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Gomer Nope. But I do know that there is a lot of politics and economics involved. That little clause described above was included by the French. And guess where they get 80% of their power from Yep Nuclear. Imagine that. Maybe if you didn’t LMAO and ROFL you might learn something. I no nothing about sewing and NASCAR.

By Blind Homer

May 31, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

3 degrees celsius won’t mater much unless you’re a polar bear or you own oceanfront property. The root cause of this and almost all of our other problems (war, traffic, polution, crime, etc.) is way too many people. Without god to protect us, nature will eventually restore balance and thin the herd.

By Dusty

May 31, 2007 11:58 AM | Link to this

GWB@11:31

I will worry about Al Gore winning ANY election when I worry about the waves of the Atlantic lapping against the suburbs of Atlanta. It aint gonna happen, lovely liberal.

But you have put in your two cents worth for the Democratic Drive. I guess you were one of the six Gore supporters that was selected.

Keep up the good fight!! But don’t breathe that warm stuff. Gore is against it.

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 12:04 PM | Link to this

Maybe you should reevaluate that RCH. Judging by the econimic lunacy you have advocated during the immigration debate, I seriously doubt if you have had so much as even the most elementary economics course. You are one of those psuedo-intellectuals aren’t you RCH? One of those google brains. Without google you would be incapable of any thought that didn’t originate with your stomach or your di*k.

By @@

May 31, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

Dontcha just love this Kyoto Protocol Jim? It’s like a bunch of kids sitting at a table afraid to eat what’s been put on their plate.

One kid says “You first”.

Another kid says “I don’t wanna go first, you go first”.

The war of the economies.

The thing is, let a couple of these babies bust a gut on land or in the ocean, and it starts the big blue ball rolling.

Follow it up with an asteroid, and it’ll be a do-over.

O.K., I’m thinking here. Why do the terms

Bust a gut…

A*-terhoid

and do-over

remind me of Al Gore?

Maybe you could research that question Jim.

By Political Mongrel

May 31, 2007 12:06 PM | Link to this

It is definitely difficult to see the effects of global warming when one’s head is stuck entirely up one’s butt.

By Southern Democrat

May 31, 2007 12:08 PM | Link to this

RCH,

I don’t think you are correct at all. I’ve studied the UNFCCC, Montreal Protocol, and Kyoto Protocol for a while now.

I’m not sure what you’re confused by, but the U.S. is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol, but the treaty was never submitted to the Senate for ratification because of the stratification of developed v. non-developed nations and the usage of 1990 as the baseline year for carbon emissions.

The U.S., as a developed nation, would have to reduce its carbon emissions around 5-6% from its 1990 levels. Power generation is the largest emitter of carbon gases in America. Nuclear power does not emit those gases (though it does produce waste that must be dealt with). There is no “mandate” to use oil. Quite the contrary. Further, if there was a reduction of 100K barrels of oil or an increase of 100K barrels of oil, it would have no bearing on our Kyoto responsibilities unless it affected our overall carbon emissions.

Have I helped clear that up at all?

By deport the illegal leeches now

May 31, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

On a lighter note folks

IT WAS 40 YEARS AGO TODAY … THAT SGT PEPPER TAUGHT THE BAND TO PLAY.

An interesting article that reflects on when the greatest ever rocknroll band, an English band - recorded their masterpiece, and how today’s less talented self absorbed lefty poseurs are attempting to pointlessly re-record it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml;jsessionid=LRDOS1N3PJPNXQFIQMGCFFWAVCBQUIV0?xml=/arts/2007/05/31/bmpepper131.xml

By TDJ

May 31, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

Gomer, if laughter is good for one’s health, with RCH around we are all guaranteed to live to a very ripe old age. The guy is a hoot!

By RCH

May 31, 2007 12:15 PM | Link to this

Gomer Why can some of you never address a direct point. When you are cornered all you can say is: racist, homophobic, KKK, nationalist, etc. I am not here to trade insults, just ideas.

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this

Southern Democrat, you can bet ole RCH is googling his azz off right now trying to come back at you.

By David

May 31, 2007 12:21 PM | Link to this

Blind Homer is right ‘nature will eventually restore balance’.

Why do we insist or even want so save everyone and everything? The worshippers of ‘global warming fear’ religion are the same who defend free health care and evolution fervently. (I believe in evolution not in the dire of global warming.) We must allow nature consume the weak and infirm and eliminate them from the gene pool. Would a large pandemic or plague really be that bad. maybe while it’s happening but not for the future of the species. Those fighting to prevent trying conditions must feel humans have evolved as high as possible and are content to stagnate.

Scenerio - global warming causes half of all humans to die, plants evolve to consume excess CO2, not enough humans to consume excess plant life and rainforests flourish. Plants produce excess oxygen which aid in the evolution of stronger, larger, healthier humans.

Bottom line - do nothing and allow your descendants to become stronger, larger, healthier.

By Grim Reaper

May 31, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

By David

May 31, 2007 12:21 PM

We must allow nature consume the weak and infirm and eliminate them from the gene pool.

Adios David. Mother nature will definately be coming for you.

By Donna P.

May 31, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

As a child of the 1970’s, I am used to the environmental alarms going off. Remember when they banned aerosol cans (like hairsprays) due to a concern over the environment? Global warming has been happening since then and we have been warned for the past 30 years. Why all the hoopla now? The “experts” had all this time to do something about it. They could have controlled growth, made requests to control our immigration, and made requets to use more green products starting 30 years ago! I do what I can and I know 30 more years from now, we will still have alarmists talking about global warming.

By DebbieDoRight

May 31, 2007 12:32 PM | Link to this

Hey Adam! Google it and read it for yourself like I did!!!

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

By RCH

May 31, 2007 12:15 PM | Link to this

Gomer Why can some of you never address a direct point. When you are cornered all you can say is: racist, homophobic, KKK, nationalist, etc. I am not here to trade insults, just ideas.

Uh, RCH my nitwit fodder, where on this blog have I called you any such thing? I believe your lack of economic expertise is what you were challenged on. But…if the shoe fits, wear it.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

No * Gomer* The nuclear issue is one I picked because it most clearly showed the political side to this equation. I thought it would be a given that most people would know the developed vs. undeveloped situation. At this time I would argue the point made by Southern Democrat. I have heard stated my way many times. But, as I stated beforehand that’s what I am here for; to hear other ideas and info., not name call.

By David

May 31, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

Mother nature will come for everyone eventually.

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this

By RCH

May 31, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Gomer Nope. But I do know that there is a lot of politics and economics involved.

I do think I see the word ECONOMICS in your post there RCH.

By Gomer

May 31, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this

By RCH

May 31, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Gomer Nope. But I do know that there is a lot of politics and economics involved.

I do think I see the word ECONOMICS in your post there RCH.

By Eddie Murphy

May 31, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

RCH, you are living proof that God has a sense of humour.

By Keep God out of it

May 31, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

JBMlaw, As to your statement:

By elevating man to the position of god – master of the universe – you create unreal expectations and grant unrealistic omniscience.

Nothing but unadulterated bulls**t and hyperbole..and has nothing to do with my prior post. I don’t elevate man to the position of God because I have no evidence such an entity exists…

I deal in reality not omniscience…

Either produce evidence of God or keep him out of the debate.

By DebbieDoRight

May 31, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this

The people in this country need to have an intelligent debate on the topic and force a national environmental and energy policy.

Intelligent debate on Global Warming!??!! Sigh. If only…….

By RCH

May 31, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this

I am sure he does. While you walk and ride bicycles, Al and his pals drive SUV’s and fly in private jets. I wounder who is laughing?

By DebbieDoRight

May 31, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

“Our allies’ pleas for action add to the voices of many big corporations such as Dow, Shell, General Electric and General Motors,” said Daniel Weiss, the group’s climate strategy director. “These and other Fortune 500 companies endorsed a 60 percent to 80 percent reduction in global warming pollution by 2050, the level scientists indicate that we must reach to stave off the worst impacts. Unfortunately, these appeals from his foreign and corporate allies continue to fall on President Bush’s deaf ears.”

By Eddie Murphy

May 31, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

As hard as I try not to RCH, I can’t help but laugh watching you push that shopping cart of yours down the road. But you need to rearrange your cargo before you lose one of your valued possessions.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this

Isn’t that what Al wants you to do.

By D.A. King

May 31, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this

I don’t care about this GW crap RCH! I’m paying you to bash Mexicans. Now get to work!

By Van

May 31, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

I think we need to tell the Russians that global warming is not the result of too much “sun” but too many Americans driving SUV’s and using too much energy - poor dumb russians.

MOSCOW, May 30 (RIA Novosti) - Russian scientists have found a way to prevent global warming of the Earth, the director of the Global Climate and Ecology Institute said Wednesday.

Russian Academy of Sciences Academic Yury Izrael told a news conference that the method envisions air spraying of a sulfur-containing aerosol in lower stratosphere layers at a height of 10-14 kilometers (six to 10 miles). Sulfur drops would then reflect solar radiation.

According to scientists, one million tons of aerosol sprayed above the planet would make possible a reduction of solar radiation by 0.5-1%, and a reduction of air temperature by 1-1.5 degrees Celsius.

By Preaching liberalism

May 31, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this

This is all a bunch of capitalist hating leftist wingnut junkie science. The lib wingnuts haven’t had a cause in years to ram down our gullets while their leaders are driving themselves in suv’s and living in mansions and telling others how to live. What scientists are split someone asked? Exxon-Mobil funding may be one decipher, but how about funding from left wingnut sources like Greenwatch and special projects funding by congressional Democrats? That’s always a two way street; there are always two sides to every story even though wingnut media like the New York Times won’t tell both to you. Isn’t it amazing how so many climatologists, earth scientists, and astrophysicists from other nations like New Zealand, Canada, Israel, and the Czech Republic invalidate the hysteria of climate change caused by man? Isn’t it amazing that how so many believers in America are representative of the left? The earth is warming up by a few degrees on average in some places yet cooling yet in others at the same time, but do we really know why without causing mass hysteria with knee-jerk economy crushing policies?

Look around at the comments on this blog. These same wingnut libs are telling us that Republicans are scaring people with the false pretence of global terrorism. As John Edwards said, it’s [war on terrorism] just a bumper sticker. What a tool he is for Republicans. Whether or not human activity on earth is the reason why we are on an upward average warming trend is not the issue. What is the issue is how much human activity has to do with it. There are many charts out there that show the correlation between solar activity and earth temperature patterns. One of them can be found here - http://www.space.com/images/suncycletemps0108_02.gif . Now there’s a chart Junkie Science Gore and his well paid goons won’t show you. Here’s another from the UK where soil has been releasing more CO2 than Kyoto’s protocol of UK emissions reduction - http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7964 . It’s also rather amusing that every time something is forecasted or happens, like a freak snowstorm in May or a hurricane season that dried up, the Junkies always find a way to squirm out of it by saying it’s still global warming that caused it. They’d say global warming and CO2 emissions caused the last ice age if we all were around 10 millennia ago. Some of these buffoons even want to go as far as arresting people and sending them to an international criminal court for saying that global warming either does not exist or mankind has nothing to do with it; the kook left’s Guantanamo if you will. They think we Non Believers are the real global terrorists and threat.

The wingnut libs always have to have a cause to protest and shout about. They’ll even make up one if they are bored enough. Obviously, they have become rather bored with welfare reform, global terrorism (but domestic terrorism like abortion bombing sure gets their attention!), a major IRS tax system overhaul, Social Security reform, real education reform, manufacturing industry reform, mass illegal immigration, and a host of other issues that are more of an imminent threat to the future of this nation than some bunk concocted up by hysterical liberals. The sorry left in this nation doesn’t want America to be successful in anything, any more than they want an individual to be successful over someone else. This latest fad of global warming awareness started by the wingnuts is just another notch in the belt of wanting to take America down a few notches. They are ashamed of America and America’s success, and they are ashamed of anyone in this nation who is successful, and hence, their constant insipid attacks on America’s wealth and who owns it. Brainwashing America is what the moonbat libs are all about starting with early public education. We are in a ponderous moment in our history at this time. We have those who believe that global warming caused by man is an imminent threat, and we have those who believe global Islamic fascist terrorism is an imminent threat. I’ve seen what a nuclear bomb and fully loaded 767 can do to a city. On the other hand, I have yet to see what my or my neighbor’s suv does to animal life in Tahiti, let alone the animals, grass, plants, and trees in my own back yard.

It is up to real thinking Americans, not those easily swayed by mass hysteria and fads who think for themselves, to research what really is going on out there within our planet and solar system. There is plenty of data out there from both sides attempting to explain the causes of global warming and cooling. I have come to the overwhelming conclusion that the historic climate record we have, taken from everything from ice core samples in the Antarctic to tree ring counting in the Redwood Forest, shows that we are in another cycle of the earth’s constant cooling – and warming. Finally, I think the very idea that mankind is causing the planet to warm and cool is nothing but a bumper sticker. Anyone who thinks that only in the last 50 years we’ve ever had a drought or big hurricanes or record high and low temperatures is an idiot who shouldn’t even be voting. For the moonbat Kos libs on this blog, save your idiotic comments of Rush brainwashing for Newsmax bashing just because I believe this way. You bone head cave dwellers can only retaliate with Rush & Hannity comments like big overgrown bedwetting babies when someone from the Right says something that chaps your hide. It’s repetitive and very, very old. Get some new material please, you idiotic spaced out clowns. Until then, keep your junkie science religion out of my back yard, neighborhood, and our economy. We thank you. Don’t bother writing back here libs, I won’t read it. Go attempt to brainwash someone else, pinheads.

By Van

May 31, 2007 1:13 PM | Link to this

I think we need to tell the Russians that global warming is not the result of too much “sun” but too many Americans driving SUV’s and using too much energy - poor dumb russians.

MOSCOW, May 30 (RIA Novosti) - Russian scientists have found a way to prevent global warming of the Earth, the director of the Global Climate and Ecology Institute said Wednesday.

Russian Academy of Sciences Academic Yury Izrael told a news conference that the method envisions air spraying of a sulfur-containing aerosol in lower stratosphere layers at a height of 10-14 kilometers (six to 10 miles). Sulfur drops would then reflect solar radiation.

According to scientists, one million tons of aerosol sprayed above the planet would make possible a reduction of solar radiation by 0.5-1%, and a reduction of air temperature by 1-1.5 degrees Celsius.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 1:18 PM | Link to this

Its not Mexican night. Sorry. However Mexico does rank in the top 20 polluters in the world.

By Southern Democrat

May 31, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this

How timely:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/washington/31cnd-prexy.html?hp

By jabster

May 31, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this

Van—just one small problem.

S + O2 = SO2 2 SO2 + O2 = 2 SO3 SO3 + H2O = H2SO4

Acid rain, anyone?

BTW: We’ll quit using so much more energy than the Russians et al. when the rest of the world quits asking us to do their heavy lifting.

By James Carville

May 31, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this

Thank you for your excellent screed, Preaching Liberalism. We all need to be reminded from time to time why it is imperative that mainstream Americans keep inciting you lunatics. We have to keep you agitated so that your hammers continue to drive the nails into the lid of your right wing coffin. Diatribes like yours keeps us aware of just how crazy you guys can get when backed into a corner. The head of the right wing snake has already been lopped off. Keep up the good work though buddy, and the tail will eventually quit wigglin.

By Van

May 31, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this

I see another uninformed member of the big oil cabal has spoken, this time on NPR and reported on the ABC website

A little bit of the article -

NASA administrator Michael Griffin is drawing the ire of his agency’s preeminent climate scientists after apparently downplaying the need to combat global warming.

“I guess I would ask which human beings — where and when — are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that’s a rather arrogant position for people to take.”

By James Carville

May 31, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this

Thank you Southern Democrat. First Rudy throws up the middle finger at the right wing outhouse gang. Now GWB gives it to em as well. It appears that between immigration and global warming, GWB is mounting an all out effort to save the Republican party from the right wing wrecking ball.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this

jabster This so called molecule will not “fracture”. Therefor no acid rain Van I have read this scientist findings( 1 degree in the last 100 yrs) with potential of 2 to 5 in the next 100) Yet he will not comment on what effect a 5 degree difference will make, thus the spray. The naysayers will argue since man is mostly responsible not the sun this will not work.

By Scholar

May 31, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this

I think global temperatures rose 1 degree today based upon the hot air from this blog alone.

By Adam

May 31, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this

As always, everyone wants for focus on the evil US Corporations and their supposed greed, payoffs, corruption and other leftist fantasies. Wake up! If there is any validity to the co2 component of climate change, our contribution to is only a small fraction of the “problem”.

In case no one has noticed, the economies of China, India, and many others is EXPLODING. These people aren’t pulling each other around in Rickshaws any more. And guess what? That means the demand/price for petroleum goes with it. They’re building, expanding, and growing at an astounding rate. The two biggest, China and India have announced plans to build approximately 550 and 350 new coal fired power plants respectively over the next 8 years. That works out to roughly one opening every three days for the next 8 years.

So if we all just sing Kumbaya, recycle, elect Al Gore, and don’t use incandescent light bulbs everything will be all right.

By jabster

May 31, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this

Last I heard the aerosol experiments were with sulfur dioxide (SO2), which causes acid rain when it comes out of a coal furnace, not to mention someone spraying it in the air on purpose. If someone has come up with something else, more power to them.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

* Adam* maybe we can convince Southern Democrat and Gomer that India and China will keep global warming on their side of the fence. And they don’t believe this is an economic issue?

By Einstein

May 31, 2007 2:02 PM | Link to this

RCH, he is theorizing that bouncing the rays back at the sun will minimize the effects of the damage to the ozone layer caused by man made emissions. Duhhhhhh!!!!! But it is you RCH. So I understand.

By JK

May 31, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

I responded to jbmlaw’s 8:53 statement: “My belief system is that man lacks capacity to destroy the earth..” earlier but it didn’t post. Fortunately, other sane people here also think this is the most bone-headed nonsense they’ve ever heard as well. (Hello? Hiroshima?) Would anyone actually hire this bozo to represent them in court? Gee, LawyerMan, can you slick-talk the judge into supressing the photographs taken from space of the disappearing rainforests, and the scientific evidence that the destruction thereof affects all manner of the environment and weather patterns?

Either way, you numb nuts can argue all day whether man’s destruction and poisoning of our earth, air, water, and land affect climate change, but you’ll be missing the POINT: We’re poisoning, trashing, wasting, and squandering the life-sustaining resources endowed upon and entrusted to us by our Creator. Any brainiac out there want to argue that we’re not doing that? Or that it’s really a good thing? Geezusss.

By James Carville

May 31, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this

I don’t know about the kumbaya part but if Al runs, he wins.

By Grant Parker

May 31, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this

How utterly predictable of you, Jim.

By Van

May 31, 2007 2:11 PM | Link to this

So, the question remains, how much of the so-called global warming is natural and how much is man made?

Another query.

Does the increase in temperature cause the oceans to give up more CO2 or does the increase in CO2 cause the oceans to warm? It all comes down to the chicken or the egg.

By River Rat

May 31, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this

Global warming, the coming ice age none of natures calamities are going to take us out,what is going to be a major problem for humanity is man and his stupidity. Mans reproductive organs are leading us down the path to death and destruction. Right now in Asia And in the U S there are more people than this planet will support. If population is not brought under control the the long term solution will be wars for food and energy that will get out of control and go nuclear very quickly, simply because winning is the only option.

By DB

May 31, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this

Sorry, but scientists are not “split” on this unless you consider a 99.9% to 0.1% a split. And when I say “scientists” I mean climatologists and not anyone who has a degree in a scientific field. Politicians are “split” on this, and this has become mostly a political issue. Don’t blame scientists. Blame the Republicans(Oil Industry) for ignoring it and denying it for too long and the Democrats for sensationalizing it in order to get more votes. To me, both sides are disgusting. If you listen to scientists, they are just as skeptical as you are, Jim. And they are even more reluctant to make any huge predictions than anyone else unless they’re being paid by either side. It’s the political parties, the governments, and the various industries that put all the spin on it trying to benefit in some way.

By Thomas

May 31, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this

Wooten, your statements are baseless, uneducated and retarded!

By Thomas

May 31, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this

Wooten, your statements are baseless, uneducated and retarded!

By Van

May 31, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

JK, May 31, 2007 2:03

Speaking of bone heads - Hello? Hiroshima? - your right, that ghost town is dead and will never come back.

No matter what we try, from Love Canal in New York to Boston harbor, we can not kill it all. No matter what we try, this planet just keeps on ticking.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 2:30 PM | Link to this

* EinsteinRead him. He argues that the increasing intensity of the Suns rays are causing the damage. Why is he then against Kayo to? Duh.

By LifeGuard

May 31, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this

Repeat that over and over and over as you tread water Van. It might make you feel a little better right before you go down for the last time.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this

* LifeGuard* Tell me . Is these a true statement by Van? A simple yes or no will do.

By getalife

May 31, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this

“President Bush called today for the 15 countries that are major producers of greenhouse gases to confer this fall and adopt a common goal on curbing emissions.”

Mmmmmm, why would he do such a thing?

Sanctions for Sudan, money for aids and now this.

w has turned liberal.

Oh, the humanity.

Geez.

By Van

May 31, 2007 2:42 PM | Link to this

LifeGuard,

Sorry, but I can’t wait another 500-1000 years for that.

By Einstein

May 31, 2007 2:46 PM | Link to this

RCH, pray tell why he would want to bounce rays back toward the sun using that technique if the ozone layer were not depleted to the point that those rays can no longer be filtered naturally? DUHHHHHHHHH! You sir are an idiot!

By CollegeProfessor

May 31, 2007 2:50 PM | Link to this

You just got body slammed RCH.

By Buster

May 31, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this

RCH you need to jump back up on that forklift and quit abusing yourself in here. You’re getting the sh&t kicked out of you moron.

By JK

May 31, 2007 2:57 PM | Link to this

So Van, is it your argument that since things did eventually grow around Hiroshima again that no harm was done? Would you feel the same if YOUR farmland where nuked and rendered sterile and toxic for one or two generations? Nah… no biggie, right? Hey Van, do you fling your McDonald’s wrappers out your car window? Or change your own oil and dump the sludge into the creek in your backyard? Why not? It isn’t BAD, is it? Please break it down for us why rivers full of undrinkable water, air thick with metallic particles, and depleted healthy resources aren’t really a problem! Geeeezusss, save us from these bone heads.

By DJ

May 31, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this

WHAT ABOUT EXTREAM RIGHT-WING APOLOGIST ALARMISM, SUCH AS THAT SPEWED FORTH DAILY BY ATLANTA’S OWN “CONSERVATIVE” SYCOPHANT JIM WOOTEN??

By jbmlaw

May 31, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this

Dear getalife @ 2:41, while you argue, “w has turned liberal,” you say something we conservatives have lamented for six years. The steel import quotas, the initial agriculture bill, the initial education bill all told us that. And don’t even mention prescription drugs. One of those ironies of life, he was “your” president all along.

By GodHatesTrash

May 31, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this

Wooten, a fourth-rate newspaperman decides today to masquerade as a scientist.

Hilarious.

Idiot.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this

*EnsteinYou again assume that the ozone is a fixed item. It is not. “Ozone amounts over the continental United States (25°N to 49°N) are highest in the northern spring (April and May). These ozone amounts fall over the course of the summer to their lowest amounts in October, and then rise again over the course of the winter. Again, wind transport of ozone is principally responsible for the seasonal evolution of these higher latitude ozone patterns.”

As you can see, if the sun causes the depletion of the the ozone during the summer why not argue that a hotter sun causes a larger “hole in the ozone” ,leading to potential global warming. What an idiotic idea.

By the way your namesake was called an idiot for flunking math.

By FredT

May 31, 2007 3:04 PM | Link to this

Yeh buddy Van. Things eventually grew back from agent orange too. Too bad the guys that it killed couldn’t grow back as well. Not much of an argument there Van.

By Realist

May 31, 2007 3:04 PM | Link to this

If you people really beleive that global warming will be the end of existence as we know it, you have your priorities misaligned. There are far greater and more immediate threats to our way of life, that many of you seem blissfully unaware, nay, are actually supporting! Immigration and Latinization of our country, the destruction of the middle class, tax burdens unlike we have ever seen to support these welfare families, murder rates equal to old west SF or Dodge City, disease outbreaks and health crisis, out of control drug abuse and economy collapse. These things are in our immediate future if we allow these 200 million immigrants in this coutnry over the next 20 years folks. Its a almost a certainty.

Oh, and not to mention the millions of Islamics and other radical nuts who want to build nukes and kill us.

Yep, Global Warming is right at the bottom of my list of problems!!!

By jabster

May 31, 2007 3:06 PM | Link to this

My! All the name-calling in here. Lots of little minds. Ad hominem usually equals a weak position.

Not all of us may be scientists, but you don’t have to be Guy Sharpe to know which way the wind blows (and Guy Sharpe wasn’t even a meteorologist—he just had a high school diploma).

By Van

May 31, 2007 3:06 PM | Link to this

During the late 1800’s and the early 1900’s we had a little ice age. It was so bad that the mississippi river would freeze over at Memphis deep enough to allow heavy wagons to cross.

Did we all die out? Did we starve? Did mankind cause this global shift in the weather?

No, Mankind adapted and survive. Let us rephrase that, the people that wanted to survive did so.

I have listened to all the weenies out there whining about a 2c degree rise in temperature over the next century and I must say, I am really afraid.

When I hear Germany say, the if the temperature goes up 2 degrees we must take extreme steps to curb a natural occurance, I have to laugh.

Until science and not vague computer models can come out and prove that mankind is responsible for global warming and it is not part of a natural occuring cycle, then I MIGHT consider that possibility.

Until then, I will continue as a carbon based lifeform. I will continue to exhale CO2 and I will not stop generating methane gas.

By jbmlaw

May 31, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this

Dear DB @ 2:17, actually this is not a science issue, it is one of economics. How much are we willing to actually destroy economically in order to cure whatever could theoretically happen in the great greenhouse? I like the idea of surfing the Arctic Ocean.

By jbmlaw

May 31, 2007 3:11 PM | Link to this

Dear RCH @ various times, you have fought the good battle, but you are wasting your time on the true believers. Global Warming is one of the sacraments of modern Druidism – telling people that they are misguided, on an issue of faith, is wasted breath.

By CollegeProfessor

May 31, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this

RCH, you are trying to tap dance around fact by googling up anything that you can find that sounds remotely intelligent. You only tell part of the story all of the time. It is the thickness of the ozone layer that has changed, not the basic patterns that you described. The patterns are the same. The thickness of the layer is not. And RCH as much as you wiggle and squirm trying to back track and change what people have said. Nobody here has sstated that the sun damages the ozone. The statement of an earlier poster was that man made emissions caused the depletion in ozone thickness. Regarding the Russian, he is trying to bounce rays back to the sun BECAUSE man made emissions depleted the ozone to the point that it can no longer filter the amount of rays from the sun that it previously was capable of. RCH, quit with the smoke and mirrors.

By Matt

May 31, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this

Global warming is simply another boogey man being built up by the liberals. Just a reason for us to vote for them to “solve” this “problem” for us.

There is no problem. It’s the same tree-hugger crap that helped give us 3.50$ gas prices. Now the liberals are going to “save” us from that as well. How convenient.

By Matt

May 31, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this

Global warming is simply another boogey man being built up by the liberals. Just a reason for us to vote for them to “solve” this “problem” for us.

There is no problem. It’s the same tree-hugger crap that helped give us 3.50$ gas prices. Now the liberals are going to “save” us from that as well. How convenient.

By Matt

May 31, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this

Global warming is simply another boogey man being built up by the liberals. Just a reason for us to vote for them to “solve” this “problem” for us.

There is no problem. It’s the same tree-hugger crap that helped give us 3.50$ gas prices. Now the liberals are going to “save” us from that as well. How convenient.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

Van Here is a way our friends can reduce 12% of methane gas which destroyes the ozone.

In Australia, animal gas is a huge problem. With 120 million sheep and 28 million head of cattle, ruminants were responsible for 12.3 per cent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2002.

Lets just kill them all. Al Gore and his friends here can then fight with PETA.

By JustAsking

May 31, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

So I guess we should all wait for some computer model to prove the existence of God before we take anything you “faith based” non believers say too, huh, Van?

By Mrs. RepubLady

May 31, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

It’s the same tree-hugger crap that helped give us 3.50$ gas prices.

That is right, the tree huggers did it! It has nothing to do with my oil stocks performing so well and making me richer then my wildest dream, that is just a coincedense. Now stop whining about the envirenment and the dead soldiers and go buy some gas! I am taking another cruze soon and spend my money on anything I want to suckers! God bless Dick Cheney.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this

*College Professor8 You missed my point. My theory is that since the intensity of the rays of the sun have intensified it has caused more damage to the ozone than man ever has. As the sun gets hotter and rays stronger you will find a slow destruction of the ozone.

By James Carville

May 31, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this

By Matt

May 31, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this

Global warming is simply another boogey man being built up by the liberals. Just a reason for us to vote for them to “solve” this “problem” for us.

Hope they have better luck than the Republicans had with their “boogye man”. Osama bin Laden! LMAO!

By College Professor

May 31, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this

Unfortunately your “theory” is just that. Man made ozone depletion has been scientifically measured. Sorry RCH. Your “theory” doesn’t hold water.

By nvader

May 31, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this

What scientist are split? The head of NASA for one. Augie Auer of New Zealand. see this article.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaruherald/4064691a6571.html

By Van

May 31, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this

FredT,

Odd, I was talking about the earth - no matter how we try we can not kill the earth. We have tried to kill it by poisoning the environment, scared it with wars and nuclear devices and guess what. Earth recovered and survived.

We have experienced extreme cold and heat and mankind has adapted. From the harshes deserts to the deepest ocean, mankind will survive.

By MarkP

May 31, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this

Legions of scientists who agree on volumes of evidence present a message that’s unpalatable for Mr. Wooten and get tagged as “alarmists.” Meanwhile a handful of politicians who lead us into a ridiculous war on the flimsiest of premises are lauded ad-nauseum as heroes that are not afraid to buck the polls (if I may take the liberty of paraphrasing the past four years’ worth of columns.) Who has the agenda, exactly?

By Fred

May 31, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this

By Mrs. RepubLady

May 31, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

It’s the same tree-hugger crap that helped give us 3.50$ gas prices.

That is right, the tree huggers did it! It has nothing to do with my oil stocks performing so well and making me richer then my wildest dream, that is just a coincedense. Now stop whining about the envirenment and the dead soldiers and go buy some gas! I am taking another cruze soon and spend my money on anything I want to suckers! God bless Dick Cheney.

I’m so glad that your HUSBAND’S oil stocks are doing so well. Maybe if you continue to spread on demand and putting on those kneepads, he will keep you around in that pampered “envirenment” to go on more “cruzes”. Maybe he should spend some of his money teaching you to spell.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 3:54 PM | Link to this

* College Professor* How do you know it was man made. I think that is what the whole argument has been about. The earth has slowly become warmer over thousands of years long before we any significant factor. Why. Maybe it was the dinosaurs( ref. sheep and cattle) Do we have to blame every single thing that happens on man. Especially on men in the U.S.

By JK

May 31, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

Van, once again, let’s be clear: Regarding your assertion that nothing we can do will actually “kill” the earth (nevermind the many organisms that sit upon it), are you saying that your assertion JUSTIFIES any darn thing we want to do to it? (That’s a yes or no question there, Dude.) Are you saying it’s OKAY to pollute and trash and waste and squander and poison? And if so, do you mean without limits? And if you favor limits of some sort, what might they be? Is it okay to pollute and poison and squander up to the border of your personal property, or can I flick my butts and dump my sewerage there too? Just curious.

By Van

May 31, 2007 3:58 PM | Link to this

RCH,

Good idea, I know I tried holding my breath, but I couldn’t do it for very long.

By College Professor

May 31, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

RCH, because science has proven it. Disbelieve if you wish. That is your prerogative.

By Duke

May 31, 2007 4:00 PM | Link to this

For a summary of the science about global warming, go to www.oism.org/pproject, and read “Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide”. Every statement is foot-noted to peer-reviewed research. This paper is not original research. It documents that advocates of global warming are lying about the current state of existing research. The accompanying petition has been signed by over 18,000 scientists, agreeing with the paper’s conclusions. In a web search, you will find an avalanche of ad hominem attacks against the integrity of oism (Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine). All these allegations are false. it receives no funding from Exxon, for example. What you will not find is a rebuttal of the science. If this alleged scientific consensus exists that the global warming theory is true, it should be no problem for the big-bucks environmentalists to produce a similar petition in rebuttal. They have had 10 years to do so, and have not done it. They just keep repeating lies in the news media, and no reporters call them on it. As Jim says, there is general scientific agreement that temperature has only risen about one degree Fahrenheit. There is also agreement that atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased significantly. The predicted large increase in temperature did not happen. The global warming theory is disproved. When NASA’s Jim Hansen first began this nonsense, the catastrophe was to happen by 2000. Nobody calls him on such failed predictions. NASA has concocted a widely publicized study which shows very high warming rates in recent decades. None of the best temperature records show this high warming rate. No reporters bother to notice this outrageous fraud. Republican Senator James Inhofe, former chairman of the Senate Environmental Something or Other Committee, is absolutely right: the global warming theory is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on the human race.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 4:08 PM | Link to this

College Professor Proven what. The ozone is getting thinner O.K. But how can you prove who did this. You can’t. Its a theory just like mine. But lets say for argument sake it is true. What percentage does man cause? How much by nature? Can we really do anything by just the mear fact of our existence on this planet?

By College Professor

May 31, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this

From the National Academy of Science RCH: A satellite operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration appears to have removed any possible doubt about the role of CFCs. Data collected over the past three years by the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite revealed these compounds in the stratosphere. Moreover, the satellite has traced the worldwide accumulation of stratospheric fluorine gases, a direct breakdown product of CFCs. The quantitative balance of CFCs and its products eliminates the possibility that chlorine from volcanic eruptions or other natural sources created the ozone hole.

CFCs are the primary cause RCH. Man made CFCs.

By johnjohn

May 31, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this

Yup, God destroyed the earth once, believe it was a flood. Then he promised never to do it again. So what’s the fuss about?

By Van

May 31, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this

JK,

Not at all. I am just asserting that man is too puny to damage the planet, we may make ourselves extinct, but the planet will take the hit and keep going.

I am all for a cleaner environment, but like someone else said, how much economic damage do we want to inflict.

We can make the earth a perfect place if we reduced the population (who will volunteer to go first) by 50% and go back to the technology of the mid 18th century. If that price isn’t too steep.

By JC

May 31, 2007 4:25 PM | Link to this

Did we get that promise signed and in writing johnjohn? If God is a Republican we better put our heads between our legs and kiss our azzes goodbye, because as sure as CFCs are man made, here comes the apocalypse.

By RCH

May 31, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

We will debate again. Now I have to get off my forklift and hop into my Lexus. Going to Hilton Head. College Professor I know you will miss me. But not is all lost. I will park my car and take Marta to the airport. I will also enjoy the Global Warming on the beach. Have a good weekend.

By DB

May 31, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this

Summary: Average global temperatures are rising. Carbon dioxide concentration, a proven greenhouse gas, is rising. Temperature increases(year to year) almost perfectly correlate with increasing carbon dioxide levels(even with the delay it takes for them to take effect). Humans increase carbon dioxide levels through the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and slash and burn clearing. Global oil supplies are dwindling, and Big Oil has accepted this. Greener technologies are on the way. Global warming may have very little effect on the world, or it may have dramatic effects. Humans will most likely not go extinct, but life has and will change because of this. Dwindling supplies of fossil fuels will most definitely curb global warming in the long term. And the increasing price sof fuel will curb it in advance, not alarmist predictions. Hopefully, that is accomplished before any “point of no return” is reached and the global climate/environment has had any irreparable harm. It may be too late; it may not be. To say that humans have no negative impact on our own environment is grossly inaccurate and irresponsible. The Ozone layer has nothing to do with global warming. The scientific community accepts all this without argument.

We all should be CONSERVATIVE(not to be confused with conservatives) and decrease our use of energy and decrease our waste. Sure, get a nice car, but somewhere along the line Big Oil has made you think having a nice car means you need to buy a lot of fuel, which is flat out wrong. Conserving for our future and assuring our energy independence is the smartest thing to do. And doing right for the world may pay off in the long run. We WILL need friends in the future. Right now with our short-sightedness and gluttony, we’re flying down the freeway at 150mph, and we don’t realize that we will decrease the chance of something bad happening by slowing down to 70mph. We have people telling us to travel at 150 because they benefit from it while in the long term the nation suffers. On the other hand, we don’t need to slow down to 20mph like some of the alarmists suggest. Disclaimer for idiots: That was only an analogy.

I’m appalled with all the ignorance I see on this blog. It is no mystery why our nation has so many problems. We still have a great life. Why do we choose to push that great life over the cliff?

By DB

May 31, 2007 4:47 PM | Link to this

Van: Yeah, those darn old vague computer models. They can’t even predict the weather from day to day, can they. You surely had a better chance predicting the weather in 1800 than you do now!

And for economic damage, how does decreasing our energy and resource usage hurt the economy? The truth is that it doesn’t! As fuel economy has risen, more money has been put into the pockets of people, just less in the coffers at Exxon Mobil, Conocophillips, Chevron, Texaco, Shell, list goes on and on.. That extra money will be spent on other things stimulating the economy. It’s funny how China, a country that will soon pass us in economy, has much higher fuel economy standards. Why? It’s because all Chinese leaders are scientists, and they know that without tough fuel standards, their economy will not grow. If only our leaders could see the same thing.

How has GE been profiting in the last 10 years pretty much running the entire world with green technologies making everything more efficient? It’s called human ingenuity and innovation. The old farts that think global warming politics actually threaten the economy are complete idiots. Even the oil companies are now on the bandwagon. Those old farts are just gasping for their last breath of dividends because they’re becoming obsolete unless they change their ways.

Besides, if anything threatens the economy, it the continuation of using old technologies and fossil fuel, which is just running out. The more we guzzle, the more we depend on the big corporations, the more power they have over us.

By JK

May 31, 2007 4:48 PM | Link to this

It would seem many people (you know who you are) prefer squabbling with their neighbors over “how bad” a problem really is to finding common ground and working for things that would clearly, undeniably work toward the benefit of all… Like conservation and innovation toward fuel efficiency, cleaner fuel alternatives, and more productive waste disposal (things which, by the way money worshippers, have the potential for great economic benefits as well). GOD FORBID we should even have a rational discussion! OH, the horror of not being the biggest smarty pants in the sandbox!

You’d rather spend all freaking day telling your neighbor what an idiot he is, now wouldn’t you? And THAT’s the most evident truth demonstrated here today. Thanks, y’all! What a wonderful effing world you make it. God Bless Amer—- aww, eff it. You don’t care, why should I?

By HB Ando

May 31, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this

I’m not sure what the truth is regarding global warming (and I’m confident no one here does either). But one thing I am sure of, after reading many of these posts: The scarcest, and most dwindling resource in our country, right now, is logical thinking. It frightens me to think that I’m living, and likely encountering, a lot of you people, on a daily basis. The truth is that there are very few real hold overs from the “global warming isn’t real” camp. And the few stragglers seem to be clutching to their beliefs, despite finding themselves increasingly alone on their island, as part of a larger political agenda. A tremendous volume of political conservatives have come to accept the science which validates the basic theories of global warming. It’s OK that some of you don’t believe, as is your right, but you just sound ignorant harping on the problem as nothing more than a left-wing conspiracy. The sooner folks start thinking for themselves, and stop parroting partisan political ideologies, the sooner they can join the increasingly large majority of American citizens who just want to find reasonable compromises between groups with differing opinions, on important subjects.

The truth of the matter is that if you break our population down into two political camps, and continue to believe that one side can win out over the other, in imposing it’s belief system on the other half of the country, you’re not paying attention. Anyone who is polarized is simply not going to get their way. Not going to ever be happy.

I don’t think the sky is falling. But I’m pretty sure it’s hotter, dryer and more polluted than it was ten years ago. It will be pretty funny when the naysayers are forced to move up north, because it’s too hot for their tastes. But it won’t really matter, because they’ll lie to themselves and everyone else on their (lack of) logic, and say it was because of the increasing racial diversity of Atlanta, instead of just admitting it’s become too damn hot to live here, comfortably.

On a national level, there is no longer an argument over the reality of global warming. It’s now generally accepted. Listening to the arguments here, is like taking a 3 year trip back to the future. There is no doubting that many of you are local, and stints in this state’s education system are validated by this state’s consistent, historic position in the basement of national standardized average test scores.

No matter which side of the fence you sit on, politically, most of you folks need to get off the jocks of your representation and start thinking for yourselves. I’ve never read such misinterpreted, amalgamized, opinion-as-fact rubbish in all my life. Quit using internet blog sites as factual references. Didn’t any of you ever learn the difference between opinion and fact?

By DB

May 31, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this

JK makes excellent points. The scary part is that this blog is a microcosm of our government. Our leaders are so absorbed in taking sides with those that either get them votes, money, or both that they spew attacking nonsense back and forth, and both sides pull every one of them away from reality and what really needs to be done. I hate to say it, but it’s always about money, period.

By DB

May 31, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

HB Ando: It couldn’t have been said better!

By Tinhats R Us

May 31, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

Nice rant, Ando. First you say this -

I’m not sure what the truth is regarding global warming (and I’m confident no one here does either).

Then you say this -

I don’t think the sky is falling. But I’m pretty sure it’s hotter, dryer and more polluted than it was ten years ago. It will be pretty funny when the naysayers are forced to move up north, because it’s too hot for their tastes.

Well Mr./Ms. non-conformist, it sure as hell sounds like you have your mind made up. You must be a liberal who can’t admit what your viewpoint is, and then you reveal it between the lines.

The truth is that there are very few real hold overs from the “global warming isn’t real” camp.

Nobody here has said global warming doesn’t happen, hasn’t happened, or isn’t happening now. What separates the believers from the non-believers is how much mankind has to do with it.

Quit using internet blog sites as factual references. Didn’t any of you ever learn the difference between opinion and fact?

I’ve seen a few science links here today. Are they opinion or fact? Neither. They are all THEORY. Last year the computer models forecasted a rather busy hurricane season, and received a 5% accuracy rate after the end of the season. Now, are you going to tell me that all these theories, from both sides of the issue but specifically for mankind made global warming, are worth tanking America’s economy? If we can’t prove a hurricane season is going to happen based upon computer data and algorithms, then how in the world are we going to forecast and prove something like the entire planet’s temperature patterns which is exponentially more complicated to even tackle? We can’t even fully understand why tornadoes form.

I’ll take the gamble that at best humans are causing 1-3% of the current temperature increase. That’s not enough for me to wreck our economy. After all, we can fit every human being on this planet into the footprint of the state of Montana. We are not as big as we think, and that doesn’t include the volume of the atmosphere from ground to 100,000 feet, where the atmosphere is almost gone.

By lovelyliz

June 1, 2007 8:51 AM | Link to this

Global warming has the potential to kill more people than all the terrorists in the world and we are be asked to put out heads in the sand?!?!?!?

By Van

June 1, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

lovelyliz,

Question, did global cooling(late 19th and early 20th century) cause a large kill-off also?

Try sticking to facts.

By Ben

June 1, 2007 9:23 AM | Link to this

You global warming deniers already have blood on your hands. Global warming is killing people now, due to extreme weather, drought, increased disease, and extreme heat waves. And it is getting worse. Columnists who wildly distort the scientific consensus on this pressing emergency (like Wooten) don’t deserve to be in print in a real newspaper. Wooten would fail elementary school science class.

And mr. wooten: you don’t need a computer model to see melting permafrost, disappearing glaciers, or to smell the smoke from the wildfires. You’re right about this: the disaster isn’t “looming”—it’s already here for millions of people.

A real “conservative” would seek to conserve a world moving toward being even more seriously degraded.

By jbmlaw

June 1, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

Dear Ben @ 9:23, you inadvertently lie by omission. Fewer people are dying from the higher temperatures than would have died from the colder termperatures. Net lives lost has improved with global warming.

By DebbieDoRight

June 1, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

Jim’s too lazy to write a new column today? What’s up with that?!? I guess when you’ve got millions in the bank and thousands invested with Big Oil and Haliburton; who needs this stinking job anyway?!? Take THAT Cynthia!!!

By crackpipe is a sad sullen cow

June 1, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this

Jim’s too lazy to write a new column today? What’s up with that?!? I guess when you’ve got millions in the bank and thousands invested with Big Oil and Haliburton; who needs this stinking job anyway?!? Take THAT Cynthia!!!

I see the racist crackpipe debbieturd is yet again puking up its trademark sullen patheticbitchy bile. Senor Wooten is away on holiday this week and in any event he is hardly answerable to sad petty whoralicious cows like you crackpipe!!!

See how easy and how much fun it is to gently (and factually) mirror back unwarranted abuse!!

As for the vile far left oft racebaiting Tucker … who gives a flyingfook??!!

By Amelia

June 1, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

HB Ando, your post may be the best post here ever. Very well stated. Fortunately the miniscule minority of naysayers on this issue and others have finally alienated about 80% of this country and have so marginalized themselves, that they are probably forever dead. Mainstream America finally woke up and has clearly said to them…enough. Nobody hears them anymore. They are going to be some very angry people over the coming years and probably won’t adjust well to being on the outside looking in. They will screech and scream and bang and kick on the doors, but I really don’t think that they will be let back in.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this

what these noxious dishonest lefty global whining vermin always seem to lie about (by omission) is that just a smallish increase in global temps (as already seen) will actually lead to greater food production and lusher growth, maybe not everywhere but overall it will boost flora. ask a climatologist about this, or just read a few articles written by someone not wilfully deranged by the alBOre’s hysterical lies and distortions.

hopefully another Katrina this summer will thin out some more non viable areas of NOLA that need to be permanently abandoned before any more billions of scarce enough resources are wasted on rebuilding the locales of a criminal cesspit that as we keep on seeing, even after Katrina and the enforced welfare abusing exodus merely produces countless murderers, violent drug dealers and felons.

By Amelia

June 1, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

By jbmlaw

June 1, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

Dear Ben @ 9:23, you inadvertently lie by omission. Fewer people are dying from the higher temperatures than would have died from the colder termperatures. Net lives lost has improved with global warming.

Good morning jbmlaw. Have you neglected to remember that because of the higher temperatures worldwide that diseases and bacteria that heretofore had been dormant have once again reared their ugly heads, and that new strains have developed, which will undoubtedly insure more deaths from the above stated diseases and bacterias?

By lets chemically neuter the eco nutter liar alBore

June 1, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

80% are against the unproven fraud of global whining … HA HA HA HA … another snivelling leftist liar and eco whacko distorter pukes up an all too predicktably hilarious let’s poke some fun at the nasty hysterical leftist liar post.

altogether now … let’s tell amelia to stick her/its hypocritical petrol guzzling carbon footprint up its puffy blubbery obese khyber pass!!!

By Amelia

June 1, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this

By lets chemically neuter the eco nutter liar alBore

June 1, 2007 10:28 AM |

altogether now … let’s tell amelia to stick her/its hypocritical petrol guzzling carbon footprint up its puffy blubbery obese khyber pass!!!

Enjoy the outside looking in Andy.

By Sean

June 1, 2007 10:43 AM | Link to this

You can always tell when the nerve has been struck by the ratcheting up of the vitriol. Amelia, they are already reacting poorly to their new place in the political pecking order. They know their voice is no longer heard. They know that they are finished in this country. They created their own political “global warming meltdown”, and it is going to be so much fun watching them boil themselves into oblivion.

By Nancy

June 1, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this

RUN AL RUN! It’s not to late for Gore in 08!

By Captain Freedom

June 1, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this

The Captain is pressed for time today, but wishes to take this opportunity to throw a few more of the so-called “scientist’s” alleged “”Theories”” into the dustbin.

Two in particular that rankle the Captain’s sensibilities are the Theory of Gravity and the oh-yeah-as-if Germ Theory of Disease.

What a bunch of liberal Islamoanarchoatheist horse hockey. Bedwetters and hand-wringers with theories should not be allowed to teach our impressionable children.

By Doug

June 1, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

Captain Freedom, your post said absolutely nothing. What did you say to throw anything into the dustbin? Absolutely nothing. Were you afraid to just say because Godtold me so. Spit it out Captain Freedom so we can all have a big belly laugh compliments of the ole cap’n.

By Scholar

June 1, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this

I am rooting for gas to be $6 a gallon. I can’t wait to see all of the parked SUV’s with “for sale” signs on them, and all of the ones on the car lots they can’t sell. It will be fun to see all of the car makers who made their deal with the devil eat it(and consumers too).

By Dr. Drake

June 1, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this

I hate to break this to you Captain, but germs do indeed cause disease. Medical fact. Germ causing bacterias also proliferate in certain climate conditions. Maybe you should’nt have dropped out of school at such an early age Captain. Any 10th grade biology lab could have shown you that.

By Paul

June 1, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this

Based on the ignorance being exhibited by the climate crises naysayers on this blog, I can assure you all that none of your elevators will get to the top of that tower to God that Oral Roberts said God was going to kill him over if he didn’t get er done.

By Captain Freedom

June 1, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this

Doug,

Despite the Captain’s pressing concerns, he wishes to take a moment to put your Libislamofascist twitterings to rest.

First, off, yes, God said it. Or rather didn’t say it, and what He does not say is equally as important as what he does. Say, I mean.

No where in the Holy Scriptures, or even in Muff Romney’s cultish Book of Mormon (written by L. Ron Hubbard, I believe) does there appear any mention of the word “evolution”, “climatechange”, “germs” or “gravity…to name just a few of your precious “fact-based” so-called theories.

But even beyond that, let’s unpack the evolution so-called theory. Using Ockham’s razor, we can discard evolution as being an unnecessary complication of the explanation of life on earth. We cut to the nub by discarding all this fossil reecord/carbon dating folderol as extraneous. Life does not require an evolution to be. However, nothing can be that was not CREATED;, ergo propter sum hoc cogito fillatio, Creationism is not theoretical, but is proved by our very existence. Not so evolution.

I think, therefore I am created.

By Captain Freedom

June 1, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this

Dr Drake (if that is your real name)

The Captain is a proud graduate of Wheeler High School, class of 1973, and very nearly matriculated at Duke University (where he would have studied had it not been for reverse discrimination, mediodcre grades and low test scores. Your insinuation that my education is inadequate is typical of the Islamofasiberal pointy-head disdain that we of Right Thinking must endure on a daily basis.

Know-it-all smart alecks with “facts” will lead us all to hell in a handbasket, mark my words.

By WalterC

June 1, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this

By Captain Freedom

June 1, 2007 10:51 AM What a bunch of liberal Islamoanarchoatheist horse hockey. Bedwetters and hand-wringers with theories should not be allowed to teach our impressionable children.

Theories like the one on “creationism” Captain?

By Richard Hoover

June 1, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this

Yes, Captain, there is too much hand wringing in the USofA. Especially by that crowd of chicken littles that allows themselves to be scared witless by the overblown “terrorist” threat.

By getalife

June 1, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

A must read for all wingnuts

Bwa.

By Galeo

June 1, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Just something else to make the wingnuts squirm.

Perdue’s veto of SB15:

“We applaud Governor Perdue for his veto of SB15. We agree with the Governor that SB15 would have had many unintended consequences, similar to the arrest and detention of the Canadian tourist recently in Brunswick, Georgia.

We applaud legislators who voted against this measure, especially GALEO Board Members, State Representatives Pedro Marin (D-Gwinnett, #96) and Tony Sellier (R-Fort Valley, #136).

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) and the Georgia Rural Urban Summit, among others, did an outstanding job opposing and actively lobbying against the legislation during the House of Representatives’ debate.

Comprehensive immigration reform is moving in our U.S. Congress and will solve the issue of unlicensed drivers among the undocumented immigrant population. We also applaud our U.S. Senators, Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, for moving forward with real solutions towards comprehensive immigration reform.”

Governor Perdue’s Statement regarding the veto of SB15 Veto Number 32 SB 15

SB 15 seeks to increase the penalties for driving without a valid license. In addition to other punishments, it provides that a first offense would result in a misdemeanor to be punished by imprisonment of at least two days and not more than twelve days. It also authorizes a $500 to $1,000 fine for first offenses. This broad provision would catch not only those who willfully drive without any valid license, but also persons who move into the State with a valid out-of-state driver’s license that have not obtained a Georgia driver’s license within 30 days of establishing residency. Though judges may suspend the period of imprisonment if the new resident had a valid driver’s license from another state and had good cause for not yet obtaining a Georgia one, SB 15 does not prevent that new resident from being booked and fingerprinted. I fear an unintended consequence of this legislation, as drafted, would subject persons with valid out-of-state driver’s licenses to stout criminal penalties even absent the commission of a willful act. Thus, although I support the intent of tracking persons that possess no valid driver’s license, the potential harms of this legislation cause me to VETO SB 15.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 12:02 PM | Link to this

@ sean the snivelling dogturd

I see your own level of vitriol is indeed now virtually at Johnny I will financially try and exploit my wife’s cancer Edwards or Al the TN slumlord psychotic eco whacko energy abusing hypocrite Bore level of dishonest cut and run dissembling puke.

Why the fook can’t all the global whining lemmings do what real lemmings do and go, en masse, jump over a cliff edge - each taking at least one Mexican type illegal leech with them. This would instantly reduce most visual, noise and air pollution and sort out the illegal infestation in one marvellous lemming like truly, albeit highly unusual altruistic liberal patriotic gesture.

By Death to liberals and liberalism

June 1, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

Death to liberals and liberalism

This should be the new chorus of the national anthem.

By rarringt

June 1, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

Good afternoon all,

Dr. Drake and others,

Guess it’s my turn to do the weekly reminder that Captain Freedom and Redneck Convert (currently on holiday with his fambly in Those People-free Panama City) are left-of-center satirists, and their comments should be read accordingly.

I imagine the Captain is actually criticizing the lack of reason necessary to attempt to dispute given, near-universally accepted scientific principles in favor of fuzzy, partisan quasi-science (did I actually say that?)

Turns out, Newton was right about the gravity thing. Darwin had a couple of good points on evolution. And Einstein knew a thing or two about the relationship between time-space and gravitation. And yes doc, we even had Bob Koch speculating on germ theory and why it’s a bad idea for TB carriers to travel.

However, there always remains (hi Van) people who will ignore the 10,000 internationally respected scientists and climatologists in the room who all say 1)global warming is real and 2)we are in large part responsible for it to hunt down the one discredited, incompetent one who will say what he wants to hear.

By Doug

June 1, 2007 12:15 PM | Link to this

Thank you Captain Freedom. At least you have the cojones to say that your objection to global warming is biblical, unlike all the other passengers on your ship of fools that don’t. They are ashamed to say it, and their shame only causes them to make themselves look like bigger fools than they really are with some of the idiotic arguments that they put forth. Thanks for your candid post.

By Sean

June 1, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 12:02 PM |Why the fook can’t all the global whining lemmings do what real lemmings do and go, en masse, jump over a cliff edge - each taking at least one Mexican type illegal leech with them. This would instantly reduce most visual, noise and air pollution and sort out the illegal infestation in one marvellous lemming like truly, albeit highly unusual altruistic liberal patriotic gesture.

I will do exactly that IF: You will go first with at least one international terrorist tucked under your arm. Since you have never even seen one, can’t find one, and the chance of you ever doing so is about 9,000,000,000 to 1, neither of us will ever be jumping will we moron?

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

I see the ever dishonest rabid is puking up its witless moronic distortions yet again.

just one “discredited incompetent” opponent - eh rabid? you must have yet again been smoking some of crackpipe’s bad rocks last night!!

http://www.renewamerica.us/analyses/050317hutchison.htm

By FJC

June 1, 2007 12:30 PM | Link to this

Obviously the naysayers all are objecting for “faith” based reasons. When you have “faith” you don’t have to think. Someone just says “trust me” and they do. The higher the level of ignorance, the greater the level of faith.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

sean the lying dogturd’s lily livered quivering response is as full of lies as anything the vainglorious nutter alBOre pukes up in its worthless huge carbon footprint existence.

there are NUMEROUS international terrorists … just pop over to Tehran bollock chops and chat to all the gutless towel head Hizbollocks type terrorists all hiding from the USA and Mossad. Then go to Beirut and Gaza and most other mohammedan sh!tholes - then go to Londonistan, Paris, New Jersey, Germany, North AfriKa. the horn of Afrika … and Pakistan, Afghanistan and so on.

pathetic liberal LIAR!!

By Sean

June 1, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this

Then find one nimrod! I’m ready to jump. To fall on my sword and do the whole world a favor by taking you with me. Put it up ANDY!

By Richard Hoover

June 1, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

You’re wasting your breath Sean. Andy and Joe Lieberman have the same agenda.

By Richard Hoover

June 1, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

I bet he could pop on over to Israel and find a few terrorists of the state sponsored type. Ain’t that right Andy?

By getalife

June 1, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this

The gutless cowards are just plain scared.

Muslims, illegal immigration, global warming, etc..

It just too much for their tiny spines to handle.

By Sean

June 1, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

Don’t forget the tiny brain part, getalife.

By JK

June 1, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Hey Van,

It’s after lunch now, and you’ve only insulted ONE person! You’re falling down on the job, buddy. Get on it before people start having a rational discussion about the benefits of cleaner fuels, cleaner air and water, conservation of resources, and the potential economic benefits of technological innovation to those ends. You’re not telling everybody how effing stooopid they are, and repeating your irrational fear of potential (though undefinable and unsubstantiated) financial ruin from alternative engery! Without your contant berating of anything “leftist,” we might have a logical discourse. OH THE HORROR! HELP! QUICK!

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

who the fook is “ANDY”?

You lefties are utterly obsessed with this Andy chap!!

the point dimwited lying Sean, is that the world, as cited immediately above is bloated with murderous towel head terrorists. I’ve given you the places to go look and find at least a million or two. Typical of a lazy sullen indolent impotent factually hammered leftist to expect its conservative betters to go do the research/field work for them. Tell you what bubba, I’ll go find you a terrorist if you FIRST go find me some loose powder anthrax, some Polonium 210 and half a dozen very large, very hungry anacondas - in that order.

By Gunny Clark

June 1, 2007 1:00 PM | Link to this

Right wingers evolved from the lowest lifeform for nothing more than to crawl out from under the rocks that constituted the womb that gave them life for no other reason than to be cannon fodder for the Jim Bakers, Jimmy Swaggarts, Benny Hinns, Ted Haggards, et al. These people are nothing more than JO material for a Carl Rove wet dream.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this

I bet he could pop on over to Israel and find a few terrorists of the state sponsored type

well said bubbaturd … there’s hamas, islamic jihad, al towel head in palestine, the aljizzera martyrs brigade, the pflp, hizbollocks and so on.

By Richard Hoover

June 1, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

You left out Mossad and the Israeli military did you not, Andy?

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

Right wingers evolved from the lowest lifeform for nothing more than to crawl out from under the rocks that constituted the womb that gave them life for no other reason than to be cannon fodder for the Jim Bakers, Jimmy Swaggarts, Benny Hinns, Ted Haggards, et al. These people are nothing more than JO material for a Carl Rove wet dream.

But even these religious nutter fanatics are still intellectually, morally and genetically WAY ABOVE the below average invertebrate cut and run treasonous leftist homo loving, illegal leeches pandering pond scum on the must be liquidated immediately lice infested left!!

PS … how quaint to see one of these sick leftist queers has a thang for Karl Rove.

By Sean

June 1, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 12:52 PMI’ll go find you a terrorist if you FIRST go find me some loose powder anthrax, some Polonium 210 and half a dozen very large, very hungry anacondas - in that order.

Andy, I can probably find the Anacondas. They have a good supply at the zoo. The other stuff is kinda like those terrorists that you are scared shi%tless of…..impossible to find.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

@ STUPID DICK

please get over your desperate homo obsession with Andy - whoever the hell that is!!!

The Mossad and the IDF are the regions’ only reasonable, surprisingly very tolerant folks who unassailably occupy the moral high ground in the ME. Funny how leftist pukes like you defend nazi inspired cowardly genodical towel heads!! So no surprise there then!!!

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this

poor old Seanturd

anything that requires a bit of resourcefulness it wimpily shies away from like a yellowbellied simpering spineless quivering scaredycat rabbit!!!

terrorists do NOT scare conservatives dickforbrainsSean. such cowardly killers are there to be killed/imprisoned. it seems you are projecting the archetypal, innate liberal gutlessness onto anyone who opposes your cut and run surrender monkey bollocks.

please stop your loathsome homo obsession with ‘Andy’, it makes you seem like an effete Bwarney Fwank shirtlifter from Assachussetts.

By Richard Hoover

June 1, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this

Struck a nerve Andy? Got your panties all in a wad, chicken boy? I guess tall blonde haired blue eyed Germans have that peculiar effect on you don’t they.

By Doug

June 1, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this

This is funnier than Andy peeking through his curtains to see if the terrorists are in the bushes before he streaks to the mailbox for his government assistance check! Sean and Hoover have him incited to the point of meltdown. By the way Andy, just where did you see your last terrorist? You need to tell your shrink about all those bad guys running around in your head Andy.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this

Got your panties all in a wad, chicken boy? I guess tall blonde haired blue eyed Germans have that peculiar effect on you don’t they.

NOPE - happily I dont at all share your filthy queer fantasies.

as I’m English tw atface and we all kind of hate or at least like to laugh at and niggle the Germans about 2 world wars and 1 world cup and that glorious 5 - 0 hammering by the lads in Berlin a while back that is almost as laughable as your finally getting AIDS in that San Fran Sicko bathhouse last year!!

dum de dum de dum … we know what you like in your wardrobe -dont we Bwarney Fwank homo rent boy??!! (gedditt??)

perhaps you leftist queers would now actually get back to debating politics and current affairs as I have been most of the day on here!! your boorish moronic childish abuse is in one way most pleasing - as it unerringly reflects the incandescent vapidity of all leftists -but it does get a tad booring after several cyber piles of your pinko puke have been posted.

By Moshe

June 1, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this

Hey man! That Andy sure is one fu&cked up dude. Can’t see what is real, and sees everything that isn’t! You need help my brother.

By bbq bob

June 1, 2007 2:05 PM | Link to this

Rivers in London, St. Petersburg and Moscow froze over so thoroughly that people held winter fairs on the ice. There were serious crop failures, famines and disease due to the cooler climate. In America, New England had no summer in 1816. It wasn’t until 1860 that the temperature sufficiently warmed to cause the glaciers to retreat. Can I have a Captain Jack Sparrow That’s VERY interesting comment on that please? The globe warms up, famine. The globe cools down, famine. Weren’t we all chasing our tails about global cooling in the 1970s? Why yes pups, we were. It’s the end of the world people. Forget about weird beards flying bomb laden bin laden? magic carpets into our buildings. We’re all doomed due to nature. The sun is going to expand in some 5,000,000,000 years and consume mother earth, give or take a billion after the helium runs out. But to make ourselves feel better about the inevitable ice ages and all the warming trends and cooling trends inbetween, let’s reverse America’s economic prosperity and live like cattle corralled by the government. Then we can all blame W while China takes us over after they laughed Kyoto out the door. But what the hey, at least we tried saved the planet from nature with drastic draconian measures and at least we can feel better about ourselves.

[sarcasm off]

By Pope rednecks - Amerikka's Al Qaeda I

June 1, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

Greetings, diseased garbage, from We the Pope.

Imagine my chagrin to find that sorry diseased redneck trash from Georgia had the stupidity and audacity to attempt to spread his pestilence to not only Georgia trash but to decent human beings like myself.

The Pope demands that you southron trash keep your filthy diseased-ridden bodies south of the Maxon-Dixon in Dicksea.

We are tired of your attempts at bio-terrorism.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 2:53 PM | Link to this

rednekkks NAMBLA - long time you no puke up on here … make it a longer hiatus next time - like forever dickwipe!!!

Naturally we all hope your filthy depraved child molesting in the child molestors paradise of VT soon gets you max jail time. Ideally of course inadequate yankkkee social lepers like your noxious smegma ridden paedophile self need to be aborted at birth, if not before. All southerners and LEGAL Dixie residents are still extremely grateful to the GBI for running you out of the south at gunpoint. Any chance of getting your equally sick paedophile partner aborted foreskin to join you up there. I take it your “married life” with J M Karr is going swimmingly.

and cheers for all the usual pathetic homo themed posts earlier today. at least it keeps you away from innocent VT kiddies for a while!!!

By rarringt

June 1, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this

Now Andy,

Thats not a very nice way of responding, is it?

By Scholar

June 1, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this

I guess there was a message in all of that.

By Outsource Wooten's Column to India

June 1, 2007 3:29 PM | Link to this

Ah, the hazy days of summer. It hearkens back to my own childhood, and the time when I learned the word “smegma”. How bold! How daring! A word redolent with possibility, the best insult possible. Though I was only eleven, I knew I had the best putdown word ever, one that only a person of my advanced erudition could possibly have at the ready.

I’d like to thank our friend ScumTruthLiberalObsessive faux Brit wanker for reminding of that more innocent time in my personal maturation.

Doofus.

By Outsource Wooten's Column to India

June 1, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this

I came here looking for the usual Wooten Friday pi$$ing contest. It appears the Bangalore bureau of the AJC has gone on strike, leaving no one available to scratch out today’s Wooten fiesta.

In its stead, the spectacle of 100 monkeys typing randomly in the comments. Not quite Shakespeare, but an acheivement nonetheless.

By stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore

June 1, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

poor old paedophile rednekkks NAMBLA

it needs one of its very own legion of twisted dumbarse ids to fawningly come to its execrable defence. see how effortlessly one nonchalant, rarely if ever deployed (on here) word, like the naughty school playground jibe smegma, can instantly set off NAMBLA et al into yet another imbecilic unhinged rant.

time already to graciously and quietly give in to that shrill irresistable suicidal inner voice rednekkks …

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 8:14 AM | Link to this

Look at this anti American sh-it:

{{{Lebanese tanks and armored vehicles battled their way into the outer neighborhoods of a Palestinian refugee camp Friday in some of the heaviest fighting since violence broke out between the military and al-Qaida-inspired militants nearly two weeks ago.-Urinal}}}

It’s like seeing all the foreign Al Qaeda cut throats getting slaughtered in Iraq is enough motivation for these other wise calm and collected sheep herders in Lebanon to go berserk and take up arms against women and children.

FY Atlanta Journal Constitution, stick it up your as-s, everybody knows that Syria is sending these murderers into Lebanon, with express orders to hide amongst the women and children of the refugee camps, just like the sniveling Coward liberals that they are, so brave, so courageous hiding behind the old people.

They are LOSING in Iraq and looking for some place safer for their cowards to hide.

Scumbags.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

Glamorizing this ghoul:

{{{ Coldwater, Mich. —- Jack Kevorkian, the retired pathologist dubbed “Dr. Death” for claims that he participated in at least 130 assisted suicides, left prison after eight years Friday still believing people have the right to die. A smiling Kevorkian, now 79, vows not to help with assisted suicides.}}}

Yeah, especially his own suicide.

We won’t be seeing that anytime soon, these bloodsuckers like Mike Wallace, want you to die and get off of their social security benefits, but they live on to be a 102 years old.

Killing 50 year olds the whole time, geez.

It’s like Bin Laden sending out his dumbas-s liberal suicide bombers, he’s got plenty of brainwashed volunteers.

When is he gonna go?

Shees.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

The VFW goes out of it’s way to do what is right, free speech is a guarantee in this country after all, and the Atlanta Journal Constitution rubs it in their faces:

Vets’ group backs anti-war protester

Does this not sound like the VFW is now against the Iraq war? Read on:

{{{The Veterans of Foreign Wars, the nation’s largest combat veterans group, urged the military to “exercise a little common sense” and call off its investigation of a group of Iraq war veterans who wore their uniforms during anti-war protests.}}}

This is why I call you people scumbags, you are using the soldier and the VFW in it’s cause to do right, to conjure up protestors in favor of your Coward agenda.

This should be a lesson for all others of how desperate these candy as-s Cowards are to twist words and flat out lie, you ever notice how I catch them doing it ALL of the time?

What kind of “righteous” cause would need so many lies told to make it legitimate?

Why do they lie about CO2 and “global warming?” Why do they say the oceans will rise 20 feet when the ice caps melt, an impossibility? Why do they whistle past the graveyard of a hundred million dead African children while they honor the legacy of Rachel Carson, banner of DDT and murderer of millions, the original scare monger?

Why do they call Bush a liar and a criminal, spend ALL of their time investigating him but never find anything? Congress is nothing but a White House oversight committee, when they gonna start earning their pay? Are they a Total do nothing Congress?

When is all of this oil gonna start coming out of Iraq?

How did fire twist and collapse that bridge in San Fran after you 9/11 conspiracy moonbats told us fire wouldn’t melt steel?

If you’re gonna have the most “ethical” congress in History, when will Murtha, Feinstein, Jefferson, Pelosi, Kennedy, Reyes and all the others get brought up on charges?

EWhen is your 100 hour agenda gonna start, hahahaha.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{PUBLIC EDITOR: News can be edgy without crossing the fine line.Watson said Tuesday’s “Top Five Sexiest Athletes” list, provided at the AJC’s request by Lisa Ann Taylor, also known as the “Mansion Madam,” was a new low.}}}

Um, you’ve already “crossed” that line and are standing firmly on the other side.

I read the AJC to track the anti American sniveling Coward agenda, I like to stay abreast of what our enemies are thinking, and thumbing through the filth factory, both in print and on line, leads me to believe one of two things:

A) The content editor of the Atlanta Journal Constitution is a shallow, mindless, depraved pervert or

B) The content editor of the Atlanta Journal Constitution believes that the readers are shallow, mindless, depraved perverts.

I cut out and saved the front page splash of the movie Thirteen where the AJC made a special attempt to glorify the sexuality of a couple of thirteen year old girls and I have the picture from the “Movie” section of the three naked guys cavorting around on the beach arm in arm.

(Go ahead and call me a fa-g Polly/ Sailor, show everyone your vast Atlanta intelligence.)

No, Angela, the AJC owns the gutter and that’s where all of it’s employees dwell.

In your own little filthy world, you may think that you are “enlightened” and “better then the rest of us” but in our world, where we know it is HARDER to do the right thing then it is to wallow in the disgusting, we agree that you are “enlightened” too.

Geez.

So pat your self on the back for “walking” that “line.”

What ever good you think that does.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Time for Tough Talking Trannies

June 2, 2007 8:47 AM | Link to this

TFTT and Andi/e - losers? Lovers?

Both.

Definitely meant for each other.

Come out of the closet, girls - everybody knows you’re in there…

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By Incarcerate Pedo Andy

June 2, 2007 8:53 AM | Link to this

I cut out and saved the front page splash of the movie Thirteen where the AJC made a special attempt to glorify the sexuality of a couple of thirteen year old girls and I have the picture from the “Movie” section of the three naked guys cavorting around on the beach arm in arm.

Collecting kiddie porn is a felony, moron.

Pervert…

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 9:01 AM | Link to this

{{{By WootenDull June 2, 2007 8:14 AM (Go ahead and call me a fa-g Polly/ Sailor, show everyone your vast Atlanta intelligence.)}}}

I own these stupid filthy lurkers:

{{{By Time for Tough Talking Trannies June 2, 2007 8:47 AM TFTT and Andi/e - losers? Lovers? Both Definitely meant for each other. Come out of the closet, girls - everybody knows you’re in there…}}}

Display your vast mindless insults and gay bashing, Coward, IT IS ALL YOU HAVE TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE TRUTH WITH.

You are the true wormy little troll Coward, any 3 year old can call some one a qu-e-er but 3 year olds don’t.

They are more grown up than that.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Blog Addiction Center

June 2, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this

Andy (LuckoDull), would you mind if one of our counselors paid you a visit?

Your wife and daughter hate the idea of an intervention. We like to avoid that too.

What do you say! Let us help!

By Rev Haggard

June 2, 2007 9:12 AM | Link to this

Hey WootenDull LuckoDull Andy, I’ve got some old Sears catalogs if you want to borrow them.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 9:27 AM | Link to this

A week off, and it’s obvious I didn’t miss much: Leninists on the diseased left calling Jim names and wishing for this blog to shut down. What the hell will these jackasses do with themselves if they can’t be infatuated with and stalk those who don’t agree with them? Surely they’d get bored with themselves talking the same diseased monotonous monkey talk amongst themselves on RATunderground.com and Daily Kook and other sick liberal wingnut HATE SITES. (That’s right liberal fascist goons, YOU people HATE those who don’t think like you, ya candyassed communist wannabe pigs).

It’s still hilarious watching WD paw the diseased liberal monkeybats around on this blog. He gives those jackasses plenty to address, yet the filthy traitorous cowards only retaliate with homosexual epithets. It must S-U-C-K to be a filthy mangy deranged disgusting liberal demonRAT. Buncha miserable pathetic sub humans is all they are. Walking dead. Zombies.

One thing that’s been amusing is listening to all the pigs on the left b!tch about wanting to get a grip on the RAT lie of man made global warming. There was a great link posted yesterday that needs to be revisited.

That sounds about the same as the whineyassed global walarmist liberal cowards hiding under their beds, with two exceptions: thirty years and an opposite needle point on the trusty old thermometer. Eff off you facist Stalinist RATs. I’ll grill whatever the F I want to, drive whatever the F I want to, own whatever the F I want to, and live however in the F I want to. There is nothing you filthy fascist nazi wannabe pukes on the left can do about it.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this

“By Blog Addiction Center”

This, from the only blogger here that posts 7x10 under too many aliases to log. This, from the most obsessive stalker who can’t sleep at night knowing someone is out there who just might post something on a Conservative blog that that sub human doesn’t agree with. (BOO!) This, from a buttdongle liberal demoncat who can’t do anything but monitor and lurk on this blog 7x10.

Told ya filthy deranged liberals are sick.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 9:36 AM | Link to this

{{{By Blog Addiction Center June 2, 2007 9:06 AM Andy (LuckoDull), would you mind if one of our counselors paid you a visit? Your wife and daughter hate the idea of an intervention. We like to avoid that too. What do you say! Let us help!}}}

Look in the mirror, troll, lurker.

At least I have something to offer to the discussion, you know, that whole political blog thing^^.

You are just here to slime and filth and vomit on everyone else, trash.

Child, helpless, mindless, slobbering infant.

Seek help is right.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Captain Freedom

June 2, 2007 9:44 AM | Link to this

Well, since Mr Wooten has seen clear to abandon ship here, and given that my Best Friend Forever Markus continues to present the best face possible on the Right Thinking mindset, the Captain bids you leave for the weekend.

I am going to attend a Fred Thompson for President Prayer Vigil. He is our one True hope to stop Muff Romney and Don Giuliani from subverting our True Belief forever. The very idea of a Papist or Mormon cultist carrying the Conservative Banner. It makes the Captain want to spit.

By Blog Addiction Center

June 2, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this

Lucko Wooten Andy Sybil, you are nothing more than a glorified crack ho. Why would anyone listen to you?

There is something very wrong with a person that spends half his life on a blog. You are sick.

I would never ask an addict for advice on politics or anything else. You are more of a joke around here than anything else. I’m sure you know that.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

DDR,

I see you mentioned the Dodo Bird as an example of the role man played in its extinction.

F.Y.I. -

Scientists who unearthed a mass dodo grave in Mauritius say they have found evidence showing a natural disaster killed the birds long before humans arrived on the Indian Ocean island…. While the latest find does not disprove the human theory, the scientists are convinced there was a mass dodo death, possibly caused by a cyclone or flood, pre-dating the arrival of humans, says Christian Foo Kune, of the sugar estate where the remains were found. “The fact that there are such a wide range of animals there, small and big ones, suggests that there was a sudden natural disaster,” he says. “The mass grave also shows no domestic animals, so it is prior to the arrival of man.”

Marcus,

Thanks for the great link!

I see it mentions Reid Bryson. This is my favorite link for all of those people like the Georgia Tech “engineer” (Is there such a thing as a Weather Engineer?/sarc) who claim the debate is over and demand that only climatologists opine on the topic.

Presenting Dr. Reid Bryson, “The Father of Scientific Climatology”-

His credentials:

Reid A. Bryson holds the 30th PhD in Meteorology granted in the history of American education. Emeritus Professor and founding chairman of the University of Wisconsin Department of Meteorology—now the Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences—in the 1970s he became the first director of what’s now the UW’s Gaylord Nelson Institute of Environmental Studies. He’s a member of the United Nations Global 500 Roll of Honor—created, the U.N. says, to recognize “outstanding achievements in the protection and improvement of the environment.” He has authored five books and more than 230 other publications and was identified by the British Institute of Geographers as the most frequently cited climatologist in the world.

For more info on his credentials go here: www.alumnifriends.mines.edu/photogallery/2003/hondegreemedal200305/bryson.htm

What he says:

“Climate’s always been changing and it’s been changing rapidly at various times, and so something was making it change in the past,” he told us in an interview this past winter. “Before there were enough people to make any difference at all, two million years ago, nobody was changing the climate, yet the climate was changing, okay?”/ “All this argument is the temperature going up or not, it’s absurd,” Bryson continues. “Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air.”

{{{Bryson describes the navigational instructions provided for Norse mariners making their way from Europe to their settlements in Greenland. The place was named for a reason: The Norse farmed there from the 10th century to the 13th, a somewhat longer period than the United States has existed. But around 1200 the mariners’ instructions changed in a big way. Ice became a major navigational reference. Today, old Viking farmsteads are covered by glaciers./Bryson mentions the retreat of Alpine glaciers, common grist for current headlines. “What do they find when the ice sheets retreat, in the Alps?”/“A silver mine! The guys had stacked up their tools because they were going to be back the next spring to mine more silver, only the snow never went,” he says. “There used to be less ice than now. It’s just getting back to normal.”}}}

I’ll be back with data to debunk the exponential population bomb myth…

By Blog Addiction Center

June 2, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this

Markus, I will only respond to you once because you are going to post the same post over and over and over and over again, all freaking day…….Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Blah

By Markus

June 2, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

“Markus, I will only respond to you once because you are going to post the same post over and over and over and over again, all freaking day…….Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.”

That’s funny, RAT. I never post the same links twice. I don’t expect small liberal diseased monkey minds like you to comprehend what I post.

I see the moonbats are in denial that THEY are the sick obsessive ones here.

Private Freedom: your sick kind on the diseased left does a good enough representation of the disease of liberalism.

Oh yeah, and I thought you beady eyed used car sales weasels on the left said this blog didn’t matter anyway? Make up your sick minds already, numbnuts.

By @@

June 2, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

This is some of that good news that liberals here want to deny for fear they might cry.

Public opinion in America and editorial opinion among most American news agencies suggest that they see the Iraqi insurgency on an upswing trajectory in an unwinnable war. That is a load of nonsense.

The insurgents, and most notably the ones who support Al Qaeda’s agenda for a caliphate, have concluded that Iraq is a dead end for their cause — an end that they are rapidly approaching. It is time for them to immigrate to “greener” pastures — green in the sense of the symbolic color of Islam.

Since October of last year, I have been describing the trends that I believe will eventually defeat the jihadist insurgency in Iraq. The most important factors have little to do with the counterinsurgency efforts of the Americans and the Iraqis. We are winning because the enemy is defeating itself.

The most interesting of these groups delivered its jihadist calling card on May 27 — the Monotheism and Jihad Group in Bilad al-Sham. Their talking points, delivered by the leader of the group who calls himself by the pseudonym, Abu Jandal, highlight the dictatorial, secular, and sectarian nature of the Asad regime.

How many Syrian youths downloaded Abu Jandal’s speech? And how many were swayed by his vitriol against the “Perfect Enemy” — the Asad regime? I bet the numbers would be enough to keep such a regime on its toes, and we will know soon enough if there’s any bite to that bark.

So who do they see as the “Perfect Enemy”? The Asad regime.

Let’s see now…

Iraq is a lost cause for Al Qaeda.

Ahmadenijad is most likely on his way out.

Now there is a jihad issued against Asad.

Somebody get the “crying towel”. All this good news is gonna make the liberals sad, very sad!

Now watch to see how fast they go scrounging for some “bad news” to turn their frown upside down.

By Outsource Wooten's Column to India

June 2, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

This blog does an invaluable service. It keeps sociopaths like Markus off the streets for the entire weekend. Good enough.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

{{{By Blog Addiction Center June 2, 2007 9:46 AM Lucko Wooten Andy Sybil, you are nothing more than a glorified crack ho. Why would anyone listen to you?}}}

Then why do I even bother you, lurker?

This seems like such a simple concept, why does the meaning of it escape you, troll?

If Andy is not kicking your intellectual as-s, if Andy is not saying anything at all important, then why would Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash monitor this blog 24/7 waiting for me to say something?

Because you are a waster, that’s why. Your life is utterly void of any meaning, all you have going for you is to spew filth and sickness at people having a political discussion that you don’t have either enough sense to understand or enough intelligence to dispute.

That is sick, mental, a big time psychotic thing.

It’s liberalism defined.

Now call me a f-ag, prove me right.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

The myth of the Population Bomb, laid out in a handy dandy chart that even a Useful Idiot should be able to understand.

Unlike the phony apocalypse tale of Global Warming, this is a real demographic crisis that threatens to destroy Western Civilization.

We have low fertility rates in Central, Eastern, and Western Europe (and Japan) with high rates in the Middle East and Sub Saharan Africa.

Of course some of you who have been taught to hate our culture may rejoice that the Middle East and Sub Saharan Africa have exploding populations while Western Civilization dies out.

No doubt much of this declining population can be traced to propaganda which tells us that children are polluters and enemies of the Planet Earth.

Brilliant.

By Mission Accomplished

June 2, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

Here we go again………………….

By Markus

June 2, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this

State Department issues travel warning to Americans for Venezuela. Did someone notify Cindy Sheephead? Once again, Jimmy “Mr. Election Certified” Carter shows what a great world leader and man of peace he really is. Isn’t he such a great man? He solved the mid-East peace crisis too.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

These are some of the kiddies where the population is not declining.

Palestinian Kindergarten.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

By Outsource Wooten’s Column to India

June 2, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this This blog does an invaluable service. It keeps sociopaths like Markus off the streets for the entire weekend.

Why don’t you just ahead and spit it out, you fascist liberal: you want people like me arrested and thrown in Gitmo because you don’t agree with what we say.

At the very least diseased liberals, you shouldn’t be afraid of what someone says here or elsewhere solely because you don’t agree with it. What you should be afraid of is your sick ilk is not breeding like Conservatives. Now THAT is something I’d be afraid of.

You know, the counter-culture of the psuedo-60s is back and alive. There are sites by you sickos out there that bash simpleton things like “The Family Circus” comic because it’s reflective of the traditional American family.

Think about the future, jackals. We’ve got all the time in the world to wait you sickos out, even if it means giving up the White House for 8 years.

By JohnD

June 2, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

For accurate information on the immigration issue, see numbersUSA.org and for an enlightening talk by their chairman see:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4094926727128068265&q=numbersusa&hl=en

By Markus

June 2, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this

PETA to Nanny Pelosi: give we vegan candyasses a tax break! I’ll grill an eggplant to that. What, are they going to have Nannycams in our backyards and in our ovens ala Alton Brown to watch and make sure we don’t fire up the grill and ovens for meat?

Nope, but that really wouldn’t surprise me in Hitllary Land. The monkeybats think BUSH is bad. Anyway, no, the genius touchy-feely good liberals at PETA say that certification can come from receipts. Oh goody! I grill vegetables and eat salads and use vegetables with meat recipes all the time. I’ll just pay cash for my meat separately at the local butcher shop. The liberal nazis can’t trace it.

I’m in PETA freaks. Gimmie that tax break while a roast a lamb leg. Feel good idiots.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this

Well, well, well. There appears to be a ‘high tempo’ of islamoterrorist yack out there. You know, chatter gained from Bush’s evil intel gathering. This is the double edged sword that the idiot liberal demoncats have made for themselves though. They’ve got the best of both sides: if we are attacked, they can blame Bush for not doing enough surveillance and failing to do his job of “protecting America” and he needs to be impeached. If Bush increases surveillance while we have no attacks, they can blame Bush for violating “privacy rights” and he therefore needs to be impeached. How convenient.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this

The gop are losing their people as fast as the Iraqi people are losing their lives

This is great news for our country.

By Snoring Trademark .... Very Clever

June 2, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this

No Markus, Gitmo is not necessary. Having you and you Dullwitted friends locked up in an insane fantasy world is sufficient.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

As expected, Jihad McKinney can’t stay away from the moonlight too much, even after getting a squalid smackdown last fall. Queen Poobah Moonbat is pondering the brilliant idea of running for president under the Communi… err, I mean Green Party. Oh goodie. I can’t wait. I miss that extremist liberal circus sideshow RAT already.

By JH

June 2, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this

The debate rages on. Much of it here posited by the uninformed, unqualified and unthinking.

On one side is the crowd that demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of those who are qualified and who have the credentials to speak to this matter are in, more or less, complete agreement - man’s role in this matter is unquestionable. To what degree, however is certainly questionable. Good old fashioned American common sense and an even casual observance of man’s impact on the environment over the past 100 years would tend to support this proposition.

On the other side we have the crowd who incredibly has little more to offer than the laughably naive theories that man couldn’t affect the atmosphere if he wanted to (duh?) and this is all a big left-wing conspiracy to ruin the US economy (double duh?). Precious little science and an intransigent neo-con mindset make these arguers extremely suspect. And in many cases they are eventually exposed as horribly uneducated, paid for by interests who very much want NO changes or fundamentalist frauds as were the Galileo, Magellan and Copernicus nay sayers.

It is obviously very difficult for any of us to know what the real answers are, but given that abysmal track record of the second crowd, in any and all things related to science, I fail to see how any semi-intelligent person who actually cares about more than their checkbook and fighting a desperate struggle to sustain their repudiated and failed political philosophy, would tend to believe or support them.

And if you have children, or even deeply care about them, if you don’t, I find it especially myopic that you would err on the side of sticking your head in the sand and doing nothing but perpetuating the problems.

Fortunately, for all of us, every day, every week and every month, this extremist and strident minority position is becoming more and more impotent.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

“Having you and you Dullwitted friends locked up in an insane fantasy world is sufficient.”

Well, same difference to you, right my little Eichmann liberal ID poofing fascist pig? ANY talk you don’t agree with is “insane.” We all know that here, oh so “open minded” and “tolerant” and “diversity certified” liberal RAT.

Well, you diseases on the left are always welcome to come into our homes and shut us up and/or tell us to think your way.

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

Markus@10:21

Let’s give Cindy Sheehan ONE more chance. Her grief is subsiding and she is showing some signs of becoming normal.

She has said quite correctly that Democrats were “using” her. Then they dumped her.

She is selling her property in Crawford, Texas. I don’t believe she is even headed for Venezuela.

Losing a son can make one “whacko” in grief. Let’s hope that Cindy is recovering.

getalife@ 10:52

“Great news” that Iraqis are “losing their lives”? Are you still a member of the Sicilian Mafia?

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

“Fortunately, for all of us, every day, every week and every month, this extremist and strident minority position is becoming more and more impotent.”

It’s been said a thousand times dingleberry: nobody is denying the earth is warming up. It has warmed up and cooled off since it’s inception. The difference is that nobody can agree on how much mankind is causing it to warm up. Just 32 years ago global COOLING was all the rage. Why can’t you Jim Jones sheep on the sick left get that through your pointy tin hat heads already?

By Corky Cobb

June 2, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

<>

That’s where we will find you cowards isn’t it? Scared and afraid. Hiding under the beds in your homes.

Petrified by the fear of terrorists AND the thought of having to defend your country.

Fight them there so they don’t find you Conservative Chickenhawks hiding under your beds in a hysterical panic. That would be embarrassing.

You still scared Markus, lol.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

What’s this? Valerie Blame is being targeted for ‘splaining her inconsistent statements over Nigergate? OH this is rich. You mean our non-RAT biased media (heh.. hehehe… HAHAHAHA!!!) didn’t pick up on those inconsistencies while tying a noose for Cheney, Rove, Novak, and Libby? WTF?

Has anyone in the Bush administration actually been convicted of outing a CIA covert operative yet?

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

John D,

Thanks - very well done!

JH,

Why don’t you try to dispute some facts, say from Dr. Reid Bryson, instead of speaking in platitudes and stereotyping people like myself as “funadmentalists”, which, speaking for myself, could not be further from the truth.

If you want to look at how wrong “science” can be, there is no need to go back to the time of Gallileo or Copernicus. All you need to do is go back to the early 20th Century when the “science” of Eugenics was all the rage and supported by men like Theodore Roosevelt, by Margaret Sanger, and funded by foundations like Carnegie, and Rockefeller - until eventually we had “progressives” in Germany sending people to the gas chamber.

Global Warming has all the credibility of Eugenics.

By Ray

June 2, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this

While I’m inclined to agree with herr markus and herr dusty, the bottom line is - who cares? Get out and enjoy the fruits of this wonderful economy.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this

Corncobb butt: I don’t see you keyboard warrior communist wannabe liberals here devoting your spare time to build habitat for humanity homes and cooking food for the poor. Instead, you just get on blogs and warrior away like a good little Leninist socialist pig and tell others to do your dirty work for you via tax rape and household plunder of those who actually work and are successful in this nation.

What you say is meaningless to me, filth. Useless. Dead air. Waste from a wasteland of diseased liberalism. Zombie.

By Corky Cobb

June 2, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this

Want to know why Republicans are losing it?

People like Markus that think they can fight the Iraqi’s from far away in the comfy of their own homes.

500 years from now history will be asking….”Where were the American warriors?”……”I think they were blogging.”…..”LMAO, no wonder.”…..

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 11:30 AM | Link to this

Speaking of illegal immigration - all the more reason why the borders must be protected:

How serious was the Libyan threat? A former Reagan administration official, who asked for anonymity when talking about details that may still be sensitive, told NEWSWEEK that intelligence reporting at the time suggested a complex plot. The Libyans’ alleged plan was to infiltrate a team of assassins into the United States from either Canada or Mexico, the former official said. Once in the U.S., the hit men were supposed to link up with Libyan students already inside the country. These students would help the men stage the murder, then help them flee. The intercepted information was not clear as to whether Reagan or one of his top aides were intended to be the principal target.

Getalife,

The moonbats claims that we are all robotic Bush supporters and bow to everthing the “Chimperor” and Karl Rove says is disintegrating, isn’t it? Dittos to the false proposition that we put party loyalty above country.

Indeed, those failed theories can go in the trash along with Global Warming alarmism, and banning DDT.

The fact is that Conservatives are witholding funds from the RNC in protest against Bush’s “comprehensive immigration plan” and the Kennedy - McCain immigration disaster.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 11:30 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

There is no such thing as the Sicilian Mafia.

Are you worried like the rest of the gop over the loss of “white power”?

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

Ray:

“While I’m inclined to agree with herr markus and herr dusty, the bottom line is - who cares?”

Who really cares indeed. I don’t. I had over a week off here, not something many RATs can admit to here. Those sick obsessive bloggers care, because they can’t stay too far away from this blog. They sit on this blog like vultures on rotten eggs waiting to hatch. I’ll bet they lose sleep at night knowing there are Conservatives out there who will post something that they KNOW they won’t agree with in their preconceived Stalinist liberal mindset.

“Get out and enjoy the fruits of this wonderful economy.”

I would be out in a boat today, but if you haven’t been keeping up with current events, we have tropical system in the Atlantic right now thanks to man made global warming, and radar shows the rain is coming, thank God. Maybe we should drive and burn charcoal more. God knows the smoke from south GA is getting old.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

BD,

Immigration is the only issue that you wingnuts do not blindly follow the worst leadership we will ever see.

Congratulations.

Of course, you are against amnesty because it threatens white power. Being a minority is reality you will have to accept.

The dems will gain a larger majority with amnesty so you will need to accept this reality too. You have been sold out for cheap labor.

All this reality, can you handle it?

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

Corky Cobb @11:26

You said history would ask “Where were the American warriors?”

I think YOU don’t know where they are NOW. American warriors are fighting in Iraq this very minute and you don’t seem to know that. Just another form of the liberal’s version of “We support the troops!” Complain, sqawk, retreat and What troops??!! That is what you call support.

The better question would be “Just WHOM do liberals support?”

By Corky Cobb

June 2, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this

How about for the next surge we just round up all the Chickenhawks?

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:49 AM | Link to this

Heheheh. CNN gets all limpwristed and pantywet over the 11 year old who killed a monster Rosie O’Hog in Alabama:

‘Is it just me, or an 11-year-old with a pistol, is that OK?’

Awwwweeeeee. [sniff] Someone please get the CNN reporter a Puffs, please. Whineyassed liberal bedwetters.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

That 11 year old kid has more spine than most chickenhawks.

Look at macaca crying like a baby.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

“How about for the next surge we just round up all the Chickenhawks?”

What a moving post. Like a bowel. These diseased liberals are OH such brilliant minds. Makes me want to join ‘em all in their collectivist sick line goose stepping mentality.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Getalife X,

Thanks for admitting that it is an amnesty bill. Now if we could just get the Senate on board this bill would fail.

As for “white power”, it has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with ideology, cultural distinctions, institutions, traditions, et cetera.

Unless of course you’re a member of “La Raza” or “The Congressional Black Caucus” where it has everything to do with race.

Tell me again who the racists are?

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

getalife is a mole for the Sicilian Mafia.

He is worried over the loss of extortion in “Italian power”.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 12:00 PM | Link to this

Markus,

Can you or anyone else translate this for me? I don’t know if this is chick speak or what:

PHILLIPS: That’s how they ring it in ‘Bama.

I get the ‘Bama part, it’s the rest of the phrase that I am unfamiliar with.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this

I really don’t know why the diseased mealy mouthed diaper babies on the left are so concerned about whites being a minority. Actually, at the rate our edumacation system and those in the EU are going thanks in large part to candyassed liberals indocrinating our into stupidity because they don’t want to HURT ANYONE’S SELF ESTEEM, we are all going to be speaking a foreign language one day, and I can GUARANTEE YOU it won’t be Spanish.

The only hope is the FACT that Conservatives are outbreeding the disease of liberalism as mentioned in my 10:33. Keep adoption cats and having abortions, sick liberals.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 12:06 PM | Link to this

BD,

If w says it is not amnesty, it is amnesty.

With his credibility, just listen to what he spews and the opposite is the truth.

There are too many corporate wh-ores in Congress and it will pass for cheap labor.

The racists are the gop base that has turned on their party over this issue.

They have been supporting fascism all along but this one hits too close to home.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

“Awwwweeeeee. [sniff] Someone please get the CNN reporter a Puffs, please. Whineyassed liberal bedwetters.”

“Look at macaca crying like a baby.”

Let the record reflect that gitmo is such a deranged blog idiot that the moron can’t even decipher a rather simpleton post of sarcasm aimed directly at a candyassed liberal CNN reporter. Only on Planet Gitmo.

By JohnD

June 2, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Peggy Noonan supports the point I have tried to make here for some time.

GWB is not a conservative, although he sold himself as one, and further he has been more of a Democrat while in office.

GWB, along with much of the Congress, is a globalist who is willing to sell out the traditional US culture to achieve his goals. Motivated by money, pure and simple, is the mantra of GWB.

GWB sold the Iraq War to his supporters as a noble attempt at a democracy in the Middle East and every day that passes gives credence to the MANTRA.

There is no sane, supportable defense of an open borders policy for anyone who holds the traditional US culture in high regard.

If you wish to have a picture of the US in 50-70 years if an open borders policy is continued, then you only have to look at Mexico, Afghanistan and the other third world countries the immigrants are fleeing.

The 20 to 100 million illegals will bring our society and culture to their level; we will not raise them to ours.

To think the US can save the world is folly. GWB and his close associates will live like the wealthy in Mexico, behind high walls with broken glass imbedded in the tops, and the middle class will disappear into the poor.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this

Hmmmm. Do you think the RAT media would have mentioned this story on the fallacy of man made global warming? Methinks NOT.

WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Jun. 1 -/E-Wire/— “NASA’s top administrator, Michael Griffin, speaking on NPR radio made some refreshingly sensible comments about the present global warming scare,” said Robert Ferguson, Director of the Science and Public Policy Institute. “Many rationalist scientists agree with him, clearly demonstrating there is no scientific consensus on man-made, catastrophic global warming,” said Ferguson.

Shove THAT up your noses, you America hating, anti capitalist, anti successful global walarmbot liberal scardypants demonRATs.

By Marckes'es Nefu

June 2, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

izz ok Uncol Marckes. i no inn terubol. Dady got mee feree.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

That homeschooler that won the national spelling bee? He was homeschooled. Remember, diseased liberals are against homeschooling and private choices. They want everyone to be raised as collectivist equals. Just keep that in mind the next time you hear and idiot like Gitmo b!tching about “fascism” in the Republican party. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, is relative.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

Getalife X,

Let’s see now - your credibility on any issue is what exactly?

You have previously denied the fact that the partial birth abortion procedure even exists and today you say “there is no such thing as the Sicilian Mafia”.

I think this is a very interesting historical perspective. Thanks for inspiring me to do a bit of research.

By JH

June 2, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

Markus, why are you so angry? Especially when you agree with me?! Reread what I said if you must - the DEGREE of man’s influence is in play - not that man’s involvement is.

It is apparent that in lieu of reasoned and rational discourse you feel like you must rely excessively (exclusively?) on insults and name calling.

And no matter how much pleasure you derive from verbally abusing those you disagree with, it does not make your basic position more sound. I think everyone here who has ever studied debate, would agree that it in fact weakens it. If you choose to use little but emotional diatribes and hyperbole, more rational people are usually going to dismiss you and your heartfelt but unsustainable beliefs.

Sorry Buy Danish, I didn’t realize I was stereotyping you or that you were taking my words so personally. I didn’t even realized we had met! Pleasure to meet you!

The fallacy with your argument is two-fold. Of course, even the best science has been incorrect at times. But unlike other systems such as religion, etc. it is always evolving, always improving.

During World War I the best medicine available was usually amputation and sulpha drugs, but at least those doctors were able to save many soldier’s lives, who would have otherwise died in previous wars.

Today the “success” rate in saving and restoring our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan is amazing - all because of improved science, medicine and technology.

And lets face it, ANYBODY can find many examples like you have. Or find numerous examples of qualified people who disagree with the vast majority of climatologists and experts on this topic.

But that is not the point - you are, in this case, relying upon a red herring rather than disproving any errors in the prevailing science and understanding. (Science has been “wrong” in the past, therefore it must be “wrong” now). And that is not terribly germane to the argument at hand.

Secondly, what is paramount in science is that the best theories and explanations of the day rule. Unless and until you can produce a SUPERIOR theorem, man-induced global warming, evolution, gravity, string theory and an expanding universe will stand supreme amongst the most educated and enlightened civilizations in the world.

Although I keep looking, most of the stuff I see proposed by the armchair experts, especially on these blogs, is related to cow flatulence, volcanoes, wobbles in the earth’s orbit, and fluctuations in the sun’s intensity. I have yet to see any SUPERIOR theories come from the uber-angry nay sayers, that’s all.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

No stupid.

Which part of there are too many corporate wh-ores in Congress do you not understand?

Both parties idiot.

Geez, you are blinded by your love of the gop and your extreme radical hatred of liberals. Liberals are against fascism. Are you?

Get real loser.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

JH, save your pseudo-I’m smarter than you babble for someone else. You believe what you want, and I’ll believe what I want. I will NOT, however, have your collectivist fascist scaremonger tactics of the latest “fad” invade my lifestyle.

The “smart” amongst you people in 1975 were unanimous that the globe was in danger of cooling too fast. The day we can even forecast the WEATHER patterns with a 99% confidence rate is the day I’ll listen to the “experts” on global warming caused by man.

Until then, don’t tell me how to live.

By GodHatesTrash

June 2, 2007 12:30 PM | Link to this

Speaking of eugenics, it is deeply disturbing that sociopathic dimbulbs like Bi Danish and POS Andi/e have children.

What kind of human being would have sex with either one of those animals? Evidently, those children were conceived during acts of rape or drunkeness.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

{{{By JH June 2, 2007 11:03 AM On the other side we have the crowd who incredibly has little more to offer than the laughably naive theories that man couldn’t affect the atmosphere if he wanted to (duh?) and this is all a big left-wing conspiracy to ruin the US economy (double duh?).}}}

Perhaps you could offer some evidence of your beliefs instead of just babbling on and on about Conservatives being wrong because you said so.

Or is that your evidence?

Maybe you could bust out your pinko® chemistry set and demonstrate to us how CO2 has begun to absorb and hold 20,000 times more warmth then it possibly can, which is what it would take to even begin to affect the climate.

Or maybe you could tell us why Mars continues to warm on the exact same ratio that Earth is and how that could be possible since we’re like not up there?

Gosh!?!

How can it be!?!

We wait patiently for you to call us a f-ag Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash, cause that’s all you got.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

BD,

Glad I could help learn something.

That link is history. Turn off the Sopranos.

Geez.

By Corky Cobb

June 2, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

Dusty, you said all the warriors are in Iraq. What does that make Markus and the others still here like him? You agree that the Chickenhawks like him are cowards.

You are FINALLY starting to to come out of your reverse-patriotic haze.

Welcome, I bet it feels good to become part of the 72%. The 72% that want Bush and his incompetence gone. Well, at least your working on it, a little, AND THAT’S GOOD!

Its hard to get used to The Light at first. Keep your chin up.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

John D,

I don’t agree that W is motivated by money. I think it’s clear that he is motivated by a misguided desire for “bi-partisanship”.

I think he has been right about the War, National Security, tax cuts and judicial appointments.

He is hopelessly deluded on immigration - out of the goodness of his heart, not out of any ill intentions. Unfortunately good intentions often have dire consequences.

The idea that a government bureaucracy can magically process tens of millions of Z Visas, or add millions to the already collapsing Social Security/Medicare roles without disastrous consequences is a farce.

The Heritage Foundation’s papers, particularly Robert Rector’s, are a must read.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this

BD 12pm:

PHILLIPS: That’s how they ring it in ‘Bama.

“I get the ‘Bama part, it’s the rest of the phrase that I am unfamiliar with.”

Beats me too BD. It must be some liberal code talk they learned at journalism school. You know, right after these prerequisite classes:

-Why America is bad 201

-We should all feel guilty of being American 221

-Red states are the enemy within 241

-Why capitalism sucks 299

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this

JH,

Could you be a little more concise?

Seems like you are looking for “superior” theories on a blog. Try the university system. That’s a better place to look for more facts and less opinions, the basis of good theories.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

Has anyone ever noticed that the diseased liberal children who call Conservatives here chickenhawks for not being in Iraq while simultaneously they themselves aren’t fighting their OWN war on poverty and instead wasting their time on this blog? It’s a rather childish comment to make, I know, but one childish comment deserves another.

I’d really hate to be as sad, depressed, constantly miserable, and just generally all around P!SSED OFF AT THE UNFAIR WORLD like a diseased liberal. Sickos.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

Oh look who woke up from the narcotics hangover: God’s Trash. Let the real disgust of liberalism reveal itself. Maggot.

By GodHatesTrash

June 2, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

Andi/e you’re a silly ol’ gal. Your deviant sexuality is just one of your many mental and emotional problems.

Meanhwile, stay away from children. Give your child up for adoption, in her best interests (even though your proclivities tend towards males) - it is the only way she can have some semblance of a normal life…

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

JH,

You stated that anyone who disagrees with the Global Warming fairy tale a “fundamentalist”.

I provided a link to the preeminent authority on Climatology, who is one of many scientists who think your fanciful theories are nonsense. I guess you missed it, so I’ll post it again.

Everything else you are bloviating about is just useless navel gazing by someone who has the arrogance to believe HE is “enlightened” while the Father of Climatology presumably is not.

Try to refute the facts that Dr. Bryson presents, such as the news that they have uncovered silver mines in the previously ice-covered alps, instead of trying to convince us how smart you are.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

Well BD,

The occupation has been a proven disaster.

How can you have national security with open borders?

You are in denial but at least you got close on immigration with there will be no enforcement.

The rest is crap. You still have that radical hatred of liberals blinding your thought process.

By Corky Cobb

June 2, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

Markus, you sound hysterical at times.

You’re pretty scared aren’t you.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this

From that radical right-wing rag The Nation:

The greenhouse fearmongers explode at the first critical word, and have contrived a series of primitive rhetorical pandybats, which they flourish in retaliation. Those who disagree with their claim that anthropogenic CO2 is the cause of the small, measured increase in the average earth’s surface temperature are stigmatized as “denialists,” a charge that scurrilously combines an acoustic intimation of nihilism with a suggested affinity to those who insist the Holocaust never took place.

Sound familiar regarding comments from the filthy left on this blog on this topic? Yup. More:

“In a couple of hundred years historians will be comparing the frenzies over our supposed human contribution to global warming to the tumults at the latter end of the tenth century as the Christian millennium approached. Then as now, the doomsters identified human sinfulness as the propulsive factor in the planet’s rapid downward slide. Then as now, a buoyant market throve on fear. The Roman Catholic Church sold indulgences like checks. The sinners established a line of credit against bad behavior and could go on sinning. Today a world market in “carbon credits” is in formation. Those whose “carbon footprint” is small can sell their surplus carbon credits to others less virtuous than themselves.”

“The modern trade is as fantastical as the medieval one. There is still zero empirical evidence that anthropogenic production of carbon dioxide is making any measurable contribution to the world’s present warming trend. The greenhouse fearmongers rely on unverified, crudely oversimplified models to finger mankind’s sinful contribution—and carbon trafficking, just like the old indulgences, is powered by guilt, credulity, cynicism and greed.”

Touché.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this

By Corky Cobb

June 2, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this Markus, you sound hysterical at times. You’re pretty scared aren’t you.

That all you got corncobb butt? Don’t waste my time, tool. Go back and hide under your bed. Man made global warming is causing a storm to head this way. Oh yeah, and STFU about the “poor” you idiots care about so much with OTHER people’s money. Foolish diseased liberal child.

By JH

June 2, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

Markus, you can choose to live as you choose. You are an American. I guess.

And don’t worry about some imaginary collectivist, fascist scaremonger tactics (huh?) invading your lifestyle. You are much too self absorbed and full of righteous indignation to allow anything, much less ration and reason, invade you cocoon. No worries. You are a tiny and ridiculous part of an ever diminishing gang of irrelevance and ignorance.

LuckoDull, are you related to Markus? Your modus operandi is identical. Scream and insult as a way to sound relevant.

Why don’t you fundies EVER expand upon your ideas? And when will you ever learn that it is up to YOU to defend your “science” - not me. I base my ideas not upon what you think or don’t think, but upon the best available data from the most credible sources.

Did you even read the articles you refer to? Could you possibly explain to us why CO2 does that? And then would you please give us your best explanation why Mars is heating up at the same rate. I mean that is if you really do know what you are talking about. If you are serious about that evidence and are willing to cite it as “proof” that it is a SUPERIOR theory you MUST be able to do more than ask rhetorical questions, right?

Methinks this line of questioning is over though.

And BTW who is Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash? Is that some sort of new right-wing slur I’m not familiar with? And you call yourself a conservative? You guys are an embarrassment to the word.

Enjoy your venom-fest. I’m off to do some fishing! Wish me luck!

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

“California” and “UC Davis” are your first clues:

{{{California dairy cows produce only half the amount of air pollution as had previously been believed and, perhaps more important, most of a dairy cow’s contribution to smog comes not from her manure, but from her belching, says the UC Davis scientist conducting the first controlled study of its kind.}}}

Meanwhile, any normal non liberal can like open a book:

Water vapor constitutes Earth’s most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth’s greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many “facts and figures’ regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold. Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), {{{{methane (CH4),}}}} nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC’s, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

Check it out, methane is responsible for .066% of the greenhouse effect, CO2 falls in at .047% with naturally occurring water vapor accounting for 95% of greenhouse gases.

Simple unadulterated, indisputable facts.

Now the real scary part:

{{{(Washington, D.C. - May 25, 2007) EPA is requesting applications from organizations for a $7.9 million grant to provide technical assistance to livestock operators, including animal feeding operations, for the reduction of air emissions.}}}

These liberals know this is a stupid, foolish waste of money but

1) This is how they earn their pervert living

2) It helps to harm the United States economy by blowing millions on stupid sh-it, like we can afford it.

You might be a sucker, hahaha, but I’m not.

We wait patiently for you to call us a f-ag Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash, cause that’s all you got.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this

Corky Cobb,12:33

You are pitiful. The word warriors usually implies soldiers or members of the military.

We have good citizens here who support the troops and the country such as Marcus and BD. I do not put you or GHT in that category.

By Objective Observer

June 2, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

Wow. The conservatives are getting crushed in here.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

If you need further proof at how screwed up the US government is:

Rachel Carson’s 1962 book Silent Spring is credited with awaking public concern for the environment. To honor Carson’s memory, EPA is co-sponsoring a photo, essay, or poetry contest “that best expresses the Sense of Wonder” for the environment, through June 15. How to enter the contest.

Rachel Carson indisputably caused the deaths of a hundred million African children that died from malaria when they outlawed the use of DDT, outlawing it based on junk science.

Now we have a whole freaking agency full of sniveling Coward liberals honoring the legacy of that Bitc-h, I guess because she gave them reason to suck off the side of the United States Treasury for their lifelong careers.

I cannot believe that our government is honoring someone who is, inadvertently or not, responsible for a cruel genocide, just imagine ONE child dying from malaria, it has to be an absolute horror.

She killed millions.

What have the liberals done to our greatness?

We wait patiently for you to call us a f-ag Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash, cause that’s all you got.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 1:17 PM | Link to this

“And don’t worry about some imaginary collectivist, fascist scaremonger tactics (huh?) invading your lifestyle. You are much too self absorbed and full of righteous indignation to allow anything, much less ration and reason, invade you cocoon. No worries. You are a tiny and ridiculous part of an ever diminishing gang of irrelevance and ignorance.”

And there we have the definition of liberal fascism thanks to JH. NO DIVERSE THOUGHTS! Anyone who doesn’t think like JH and other liberals is “irrelevant” with the nazi liberal Stormtroopers on the horizon. LMAO.

Don’t worry about me JH, your twisted demented kinds are the ones aborting and non-breeding yourselves right out of existence. We can wait you dimentia-riddenn people out.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

Scared to death of a few radical Muslims, losing their white power on immigration but destroying the planet and weaning our addiction to oil, the wingnuts finally show some spine.

Weird wingnuts, weird.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 1:30 PM | Link to this

This ‘splains everything with the disease of liberalism. They are just a bunch of permanently and inherently miserable jackals. Told ya so:

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/?ChartID=9

Permanent misery. That’s our sick liberals. It’s reflective in most of the posts here and on RAT blogs. It’s nothing but one big pathetic b!tchfest. God I’d hate to be them.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

Simple, indisputable facts:

{{{Carbon dioxide is a more efficient greenhouse gas than water vapor when both are in equal quantities. However, they are not in equal quantities. There is much more water vapor than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In day to day weather forecasting, the greenhouse effect from water vapor is important while carbon dioxide is not. The atmospheric greenhouse effect from clouds and water vapor causes cloudy nights to be warmer than clear nights, all else being equal.}}}

{{{ A: Well let me give you one fact first. In the first 30 feet of the atmosphere, on the average, outward radiation from the Earth, which is what CO2 is supposed to affect, how much [of the reflected energy] is absorbed by water vapor? In the first 30 feet, 80 percent, okay? Q: Eighty percent of the heat radiated back from the surface is absorbed in the first 30 feet by water vapor… A: And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide? Eight hundredths of one percent. One one-thousandth as important as water vapor. You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.}}}

{{{“If we didn’t have the greenhouse effect the planet would be at minus 18 deg C but because we do have the greenhouse effect it is plus 15 deg C, all the time.” The other greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen dioxide, and various others including CFCs, contributed only five per cent of the effect, carbon dioxide being by far the greatest contributor at 3.6 per cent. However, carbon dioxide as a result of man’s activities was only 3.2 per cent of that, hence only 0.12 per cent of the greenhouse gases in total. Human-related methane, nitrogen dioxide and CFCs etc made similarly minuscule contributions to the effect: 0.066, 0.047 and 0.046 per cent respectively.}}}

We wait patiently for you to call us a f-ag Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash, cause that’s all you got.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

Look Ma! Sun activity and earth temperature anomalies! (That’s variations for you tongue pierced idiot liberal freaks in Virginia Highlands).

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this

{{{Despite the discomfort, he welcomed the presence of the U.S. and Iraqi troops patrolling the streets. “I feel very comfortable when I see the American and the Iraqi troops because we are fed up with Al Qaeda, which kept on threatening us and our businesses everyday,” he said. “They were ordering us to close our shops because they were carrying out operations. They also have started killing Sunnis as well.”}}}

What does al Qaeda have to say about that:

{{{By getalife June 2, 2007 1:21 PM Scared to death of a few radical Muslims}}}

Nobody is scared of a dead radical Muslim.

And that’s how EVERYBODY is starting to want them.

Dead.

Works for me.

We wait patiently for you to call us a f-ag Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash, cause that’s all you got.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By So Obvious

June 2, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this

I think the liberal bias of the AJC is surely on display here. Stacking this blog with a bunch of loonies to make Conservatives look bad is ridiculous.

I would like to know. Is Markus, WootenDull and Buy Danish being paid by the AJC to post things that make conservatives look bad?

The one guy does it all day. The other seems to be a part-timer.

For that matter is Dusty here to make Conservatives look dumb also?

Knowing the AJC, these “characters” are probably in India. Outsourcing at its finest

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this

getalife, 1:21

Weird? I call any group that runs around with white flags calling for retreat and marching in protest marches during war time and then saying they support the troops….now that is WEIRD!!

I also think Cuban-cigar-smoking-Sicilian-Mafia-strip-tease-lovers are WEIRD.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

There ya go wingnuts.

Attack that global warming like you attack Iraq war veterans or 9/11 family victims.

Attack Al Gore for showing true leadership.

Show that spine.

Geez.

Losers.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 1:51 PM | Link to this

By So Obvious June 2, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this I think the liberal bias of the AJC is surely on display here. Stacking this blog with a bunch of loonies to make Conservatives look bad is ridiculous.

ID poof #1234

This, ladies and gents, is how a liberal “debates” when not bright enough or witty enough to challenge what’s been posted. In elementary liberal terms, we are just “stupid” and “look bad.”

Well what the hell, week in and week out these same half@sses say that Wooten’s blog is dead and meaningless and nobody reads it.

Funny how these jackals can’t stay the course of consistency, no? But, that’s the disease of liberalism. Float and flop around like a Fultoon County sewer turd in the Hooch.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this

So Obviuos,

That is an interesting take on the wingnuts but they are true good ole boys and girls from Ga.

They really are that dumb.

Is not an act .

Sad but true, these are w’s tiny minority minds exposed for all to read.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this

Either John Edwards is a liar or Gitmo is a liar or this NEWS STORY is a lie:

4 Charged In Plot To Blow Up Fuel Lines At JFK

Let’s take bets right now on the odds that these animals who were plotting this are NOT white Christian males?

Who wants some action? Gimmie your numbers.

Remember, John “Powder Puff” Edwards and Gitmo don’t want you to be scared of these animals and instead you should hide and eat cactus to save the planet from the LIE of man made global warming.

Sick, sick, sick, and twisted, twisted, twisted priorities.

Fools.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

No, I can’t wait. All bets are off. I’m the spoiler.

The JFK suspects and their ties.

Keep that in mind when reading Gitmo’s crap. Bass ackwards priorities from the disease of liberalism and the RAT pack.

It’s always nice to be a part of the real world and acknowledge real danger, not some overemotioned, overestrogened hysteria of sick liberalism.

By Newsworthy

June 2, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

An article in Friday’s Christian Science Monitor reports that a recent long term study by the prestigious Danish Institute of Science has confirmed what many climatology experts have suspected - the carcinogens and other pollutants emanating from the facial orifices of neo-conservatives in the southern United States of America is responsible for nearly half of the methane and carbon dioxide in the world’s atmosphere.

Proposed solutions include relocating the gaseous emitters to Mars, where the increased heat may melt the polar ice caps making the planet viable for more intelligent and useful occupants who would follow. Another less expensive proposal involves implementing a “closed system” whereby a tube is permanently connected from the offenders overly active mouths to their anuses.

Government officials in various nations were quick to support these measures. And even Bush administration scientists are begrudgingly beginning to consider such implementations even at the risk of losing their most dedicated base of support.

By Dusty

June 2, 2007 2:10 PM | Link to this

So Obvious,1:42

Join the loonies. There are plenty here but they are not conervatives and not from India. The loonies are good ol’ retreat-running knock-America liberals. SoObie, you run well with them.

Anybody else??

There’s the start of a discussion on possible Republican candidates over on Political Insider blog. No wild ones over there yet. Thought some of you might like it.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this

Newsworthy (ID poof #2376), that was worthy enough to be considered a factual source by the Al Jazeera Constipation and New York Slimes. Good stuff. Keep up the good work for your sick deranged brainwashed ilk on the diseased left.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this

“The Justice statement said the men began planning the assault on January 6. A complaint alleges that the plot tapped into an international network of Muslim extremists from the United States, Guyana and Trinidad.

An official described the suspects as “al Qaeda wannabes.”

w will invade Trinidad now if they have oil.

Geez, show some spine macaca like you do on the global warming.

Coward.

By JohnD

June 2, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I believe the original explanation for the war was noble - remove a sadistic dictator, bring a democracy to the Middle East, destroy the WMD - but the facts dripping out on the contracts for Halliburton, etc are starting to change my mind.

The Administration’s rules of engagement have handcuffed our soldiers and Marines, thus making their time there more dangerous and our casualties more alarming.

Tax cuts are obviously the most beneficial approach to stimulating the economy - the only thing better would have been the dissolution of the IRS and the end of the IRC.

Be assured the Dems will raise taxes with the excuse of paying the national debt and eliminating the deficit. This has never been the solution and never will. The ECONOMY is the only thing that will balance the budget and eliminate our debt and the Dems will not commit to helping the economy.

Socialists versus Capitalists you know.

Saddest of all is Bush had the opportunity to create the greatest legacy possible and make our economy the most dominant in the world while leaving our children with the power, both economic and military, to be the leader for decades into the future. He failed his base and the American people.

As for national security, he is all hat and no cattle - as they would say in Texas. There is no national security without secure borders and ports, and we have neither.

Bush has allowed his “One America” goal for Canada, Mexico and the US to blind him to the facts. He is selling our national sovereignty. He is not alone here, the Congress is complicit. The goal is a global economy and a one-world government.

Time will tell the story on his Supreme Court appointments.

The speech Bush gave at FLETC, Glynco this week sounded more H. Clinton than anything yet. He has deserted his base constituency and joined the ranks of the Left.

We will simply have to disagree, although at one time I felt more as you do now.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

And then would you please give us your best explanation why Mars is heating up at the same rate.

LH,

The sun?

DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH®

You have yet to offer a single fact of your own, or dispute a single one that has been given to you by conservatives, in my case by the Father of Climatology.

You did manage to repeat the charge that we are “fundies” and add “fascists” to your list of ad hominems.

Meanwhile, you deny that global warming alarmism is motivated by “collectivism”. Have you not read the collected blatherings of Hillary Clinton? It takes a village dontcha know.

You are hopelessly lost in a fog of propaganda. I don’t know how people like you get rescued.

By News of the Wierd

June 2, 2007 2:30 PM | Link to this

In what can only be described as ironic incompetence, two men, Andrew “LuckoDull” Curly of Cobb county, Georgia and Markus “Markie Mark” Dipwad who was just released from prison and had no permanent address, were recently arrested after being found in the heating vents of the Danish Institute of Science.

Apparently the brilliant duo, on a tip from a mysterious insider only identified as BiDanish, tried to break into the building by accessing a trapdoor on the roof.

When questioned by police, Curly said that he ad seen the recent report on global warming as reported by the Christian Science Monitor and that he was terrified of little green Martians. Dipwad said that his motivation was to avoid what must be a painful operation involving a tube and his anus.

Both were being kept in the Danish Gay Men’s Prison until their hearing in August.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

This guy is morphing into a full blown freaking lib:

{{{The president pleaded with senators to “show courage and resolve” to withstand outrage from voters in their districts. “It is right to argue for what you believe and recognize that compromise might be necessary to move the bill along. And it is right to take political risk for members of the United States Congress,” Mr. Bush said in his second impassioned plea this week on the issue and the second time that he has accused Republicans of trying to scare voters by labeling provisions in the bill an “amnesty.”}}}

It’s time to give Cheney a chance at the top job.

We wait patiently for you to call us a f-ag Polly/ Sailor/ GodHatesTrash, cause that’s all you got.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By TrekkieDull

June 2, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this

Good god Jim this place is full of liberal wackos……..

Hey, libs….“bIjatlh ‘e’ yImev

Klingon to English tranlastion:SHUT UP

(Btw, in episode #5 Bones said global warming never happened.)

DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 2:46 PM | Link to this

John D,

I agree about the rules of engagement. Political Correctness has no place in the military.

How we deal with the ideology of Jihadists is the bigger question, and once again political correctness makes the task all the more daunting.

Christopher Hitchens has a great piece in Vanity Fair about the neighborhood he grew up in which is now a breeding ground for terrorists, including the 7/7 bombers. The terribly P.C. Prince Charles is among those who enable and appease the enemy.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 2:47 PM | Link to this

That’s real sweet Polly.

I’m gonna make you my mission next week when all these as-sholes from the AJC get back from vacation.

Enjoy your last days here, POS.

By New of the Wierd

June 2, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

In a story related to one reported here recently, the accomplice involved in the recent Danish Institute of Science break in has been arrested.

Betty “Buy Danish” Psychotwat was detained after being found in front of Copenhagen’s methadone clinic and randomly spitting on people as they passed by.

Her stated reason was that she was sure they were either Muslim terrorists or atheist liberals intent on destroying the world. She went on to say that as a home-schooled climatology expert she was also dismayed at scientists who would dare offer evidence of man’s responsibility in global warming.

When asked why she helped in the botched break in, she said that Curly and Dipwad, who secretly were lovers, would share their Nobel Prize winnings with her when they proved that global warming was a vast left-wing conspiracy.

She was being detained in the Copenhagen Animal Hospital for drug dependancy and hallucinations.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this

“In what can only be described as ironic incompetence, two men, Andrew “LuckoDull” Curly of Cobb county, Georgia and Markus “Markie Mark” Dipwad who was just released from prison and had no permanent address..”

Case exhibit #12,286 on how a diseased liberal RAT “debates” on this blog. Stalking and all.

Sick, sick, sick.

God’s Trash.

By JohnD

June 2, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this

The single most convincing argument against global warming as a problem is that the Left considers Al Gore a “leader” in the movement.

Al Gore has never been a leader of any relevant cause. His only hope for any position other than that of Jabba the Hut is for Hillary to choose him for her running mate. After all, they have one thing in common - they both hate Bill Clinton.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this

Poor Andy,

Playing the victim and will snitch to the AJC.

I bet they will laugh at your whining.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this

Valid and credible links posted by Conservatives today that back up their positions of the LIE of man-made global walarmism:

8

Links posted by diseased liberals today that back up their positions (or DIRECT REFUTING COMMENTS AGAINST THOSE LINKS for that matter) of the LIE of man-made global walarmism:

0

It must SUCK to be a diseased liberal jackal. Oh well, I guess my JFK terrorist plot link shut those cage monkeys the F up for a while.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 3:04 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife June 2, 2007 2:59 PM Poor Andy, Playing the victim and will snitch to the AJC. I bet they will laugh at your whining.}}}

al-Gitmo: It won’t be me whining, it will be my attorney that does the whining.

Personal threats against me get special attention.

People are going to regret their actions.

By Copenhagen Daily News

June 2, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this

Career criminal Markus “Markie Mark” Dipwad was found guilty of criminal trespass in the bungled Danish Institute of Science break in.

An unrepentant Dipwad, who has professed a great admiration for Charles Manson, Adolph Hitler and Timothy McVeigh, said that he would die with a bullet to the head before he would start acting civilly. He also said that given the chance he would “eliminate all liberals and scientists”.

In a related story his associate Andrew “LuckoDull” Curly was also found guilty of the same charges. Curly, who comes from a long line of criminals, said that he “would take it up the butt all day long rather than give in to the pinkos”. He is apparently getting his wish, as his 12 year sentence begins.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

Yea, macaca showed spine on global warming and won.

Yahoo.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

What Gitmo, NO comment about the islamofascist terrorist plot T-H-W-A-R-T at JFK?

Yeah bucko, I REALLY want to follow your type of “leadership.”

Sick, sick, sick.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:11 PM | Link to this

WD-

Just let them continue to have their “fun” here. Keep giving feeding out the line…

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 3:12 PM | Link to this

News of the Weird,

BOO!

I’m off to the pool. Despite Getalife’s claims, I’m a Yankee and not a “good ole boy” and as such I don’t shriek like a sissy if its not like bathwater.

Have fun with your perverted fictional fantasies. The libs are so fortunate to have creative thinkers like you.

bwahahahahahahaha.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:12 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Are you going to call the FBI again?

Come on man, they have better things to do like stop JFK from being blown up.

Geez.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this

“An unrepentant Dipwad, who has professed a great admiration for Charles Manson, Adolph Hitler and Timothy McVeigh, said that he would die with a bullet to the head before he would start acting civilly.”

Our resident RAT is on a fascist roll today. That comment means, “start acting like a muffassed liberal demonRAT.”

These jackasses are off the chain today. It reassures me I’m doing something RIGHT.

Pigs.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

Craponlife @ 3:12:

“Come on man, they have better things to do like stop JFK from being blown up.”

Craponlife @ 1;21:

“Scared to death of a few radical Muslims”

Isn’t it nice to know what side of America Craponlife is on? As if we every REALLY had any doubts.

This asshat wants everyone to listen to him preach his Jim Jones prophecies and follow his ways.

Ummm, pardon my French, but I don’t p****** think so.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this

macaca,

The JFK plot shows how to stop terrorism.

Not invading a third world country that had nothing to do with 9/11 or cut and run from OBL that did.

How is that for leadership idiot.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:26 PM | Link to this

Hey Craponlife JACKASS, you said we are “Scared” of a few Muslims. NOW ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THOSE IN THE US AS WELL OR NOT???

For ONCE in your PATHETIC MISERABLE LIBERAL HELLHOLE OF A LIFE SPIT IT OUT.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:26 PM | Link to this

Let them do their jobs instead of chasing blog terrorists in Andy’s mind.

Geez.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife June 2, 2007 3:12 PM Andy, Are you going to call the FBI again?}}}

al-Gitmo: Nope.

I’m thinking of subpoenaing the AJC to find out who it is that is violating the federal privacy act against me, the executives at the Urinal just love those kind of things.

I’m pretty sure they’ll give me the info I’m looking for instead of becoming a party to a lawsuit.

You know what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Copenhagen Daily News

June 2, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this

In what many are calling the end of a very unfortunate incident, Betty “Buy Danish” Psychotwat was officially imprisoned today for her role in the Danish Institute of Science break in.

Although some are upset that the judge would imprison someone who is so obviously diseased by decades of substance abuse, he remained firm, saying that Psychotwat was not only a danger to herself but society as well.

Psychotwat, a professed child molester and IED expert, has repeatedly said that her love for Curly and Dipwad is the only thing that gives her life meaning.

And in a final shocking development, it was learned after a physical examination, Betty was actually a Ben! She is to serve 9 years in the Danish Transsexual Prison for Perverts.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:32 PM | Link to this

“I’m thinking of subpoenaing the AJC to find out who it is that is violating the federal privacy act against me, the executives at the Urinal just love those kind of things.

I’m pretty sure they’ll give me the info I’m looking for instead of becoming a party to a lawsuit.”

Bingo WD. I’ve got about 9 months worth of data to show from datamining. {smile}

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:39 PM | Link to this

Moving on now, the Market set another record on Friday’s close. I’m sure some pathetic creature liberal RAT would find some negative to haystack needle out of this.

I would have bet that the miserable liberals would have lightened up a little since Nanny Pelosivich & Co. took over Congress, but I lost that bet. Like I posted earlier, the Party Of The Permanently Miserable is just that.

Oh well.

By @@

June 2, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

Well, it’s me again…dropping off more good news.

Columnists: People in Gaza Long for the Return of the Israeli Occupation

Papers reported that some people in Gaza even want the Israelis to return to the Strip. Faiz Abbas and Muhammad Awwad, journalists for the Israeli-Arab weekly Al-Sinara, wrote: “People in Gaza are hoping that Israel will reenter the Gaza Strip, wipe out both Hamas and Fatah, and then withdraw again… They also say that, since the [start of the] massacres, they [have begun to] miss the Israelis, since Israel is more merciful than [the Palestinian gunmen] who do not even know why they are fighting and killing one another. It’s like organized crime, [they said]. Once, we resisted Israel together, but now we call for the return of the Israeli army to Gaza.”

Al-Hayat Al-Jadida columnist Yahya Rabah wrote: “When the national unity government was formed, I thought, ‘This will be a government of national salvation.’ If a government that includes Fatah, Hamas, other factions and independents associated with [various] factions has not been able to save the day, it means that no one can, unless Israel decides that its army should intervene. Then it will invade [the Gaza Strip], kill and arrest [people] - but this time not as an occupying [force] but as an international peace-keeping force. Look what we have come to, how far we have deteriorated, and what we have done to ourselves.”

Palestinian journalist Majed Azzam wrote: “We should have the courage to acknowledge the truth… The [only] thing that prevents the chaos and turmoil in Gaza from spreading to the West Bank is the presence of the Israeli occupation [in the West Bank]… [as opposed to] its absence from the Gaza Strip.”

It seems like all over the Middle East, reasonable Muslims are asking themselves…”Do we want these power-hungry Muslim extremists dictating our future?”

I’m betting the answer will not only be “NO, but HELL NO; and we’re not gonna take it anymore.”

They’re not blind, they know who is causing the violence. They know who is killing whom.

It’s Muslims killing Muslims.

By Dept. of Homeland Security

June 2, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

Mr. LuckoDull and Markus,

Thank you for your efforts in assisting the authorities in identifying and controlling on-line terrorism. Without the grass roots efforts of patriots and cyber-geniuses like you, we might never catch Osama Bin Laden.

You are to be commended for your actions and rest assured that we are doing everything possible, if not legal, to catch these pinkos.

Best Regards, DHS

By Markus

June 2, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this

Just in case anyone doubts what’s been said here about stalking at the AJC, it’s real. Someone has data mined with inside information and passed it along to certain individuals for use elsewhere. It’s been going on for some time, and I’ve pretty much been silent on the matter except gathering posts and times when one of the mouthers volunteers a little too much information.

This is how the sick left works. It happens everywhere. They stalk when they don’t like a poster/blogger and what he/she stands for. It’s nothing new. This is the way the diseased left attempts to quell dissenting opinion.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this

Andy,

It was you that posted your last name.

Are you going to sue yourself.

Geez.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:54 PM | Link to this

OMG @@,

Are you saying not all Muslims want to kill?

Quick, email cheney.

Geez.

By GodHatesTrash

June 2, 2007 3:56 PM | Link to this

Personal threats in cyberspace?

Please show me, girl.

What threat?

To whom?

Wootendull? Luckodull? POS Andi/e? Bi Danish?

I can see the moron now - “yes officer, I’m Misses Luckodull.”

You retarded POS.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

By GWB

June 2, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

Sirs,

It has come to my attention, via the Dept. of Homeland Security, that two particularly patriotic gentlemen in Georgia, Mr. Curly and Mr. Dipwad, have assisted us immeasurably in the fight against terrorism and pinkoism.

I would like to extend my personal thank yous and advise you that if you are ever in Washington D.C., please come by for a visit where I can give you each the Congressional Medal of Honor.

Truly, Your war time President

By getalife

June 2, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

macaca,

Do you see black helicopters too.

Boo!

By @@

June 2, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

I’ve never revealed my real name here, but oddly enough I posted at the AJC the other day and immediately following mine, someone posted under my real name.

It’s not a common name Getalife, so it made me go hmmmmmmm, whatsup?

By getalife

June 2, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this

I thought it was the liberals wearing the tin foil hats.

Nobody cares enough to stalk you or threaten you, paronoid idiots.

Get over yourselves.

Geezus fereaking Kerist.

By Geico caveman

June 2, 2007 4:03 PM | Link to this

Curly and Markus,

Are either of you married? Please, please, please tell me you’re not! I like your style!

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this

LGF:

“Kennedy airport plot stuns “reality” based community into silence:

Nothing at Daily Kos.

Nothing at Eschaton.

Nothing at Crooks and Liars.

Nothing at Firedoglake.

Nothing at AMERICAblog.

Maybe they’re still trying to settle on the spin. “Question the timing?” or “blame Bush?” Choices, choices…”

Like I said about the disease of liberalism, it’s all about priorities, priorities. Follow the dumb@sses over the cliff of the LIE of man made global warming or the denial that global islamofascism is REAL.

Choose your poison with these numbnuts.

By Second gunman on the grassy knoll

June 2, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this

Curly and Markus,

We’ve met somewhere, haven’t we?

By getalife

June 2, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this

Not you too @@.

Must be all that smoke in the air, global warming.

Geez.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this

@@, the proof is in the pudding. They have posted information elsewhere, but for obvious reasons, I won’t reveal where here.

It sounds to me like we’ve got a nice little legal brew ha-ha stirring up. I’ve been waiting for this day. {smile}

Give the sicko stalkers a rope long enough…

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this

Note how the denialist diseased liberals are denying what they have been doing on this blog with their Urinal “help.” Kinda like the muslim terrorists and blaming it on the Jews.

Payback. It’s a coming.

By TrekkieDull

June 2, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this

Hey GWB and Liberal Trash I have a message for you- Hab SoSlI’ Quch!

“Your mother has a smooth forehead!”

Ha. Too easy. Later liberals, you lost.

DuDuDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

By Aryan brotherhood

June 2, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

Curly and Markus,

Please contact Wooten and see if he has room in the family sedan for you two. We could definitely use two more white patriots like you up here in Idaho. Your daddies and grand daddies we’re proud to be with us.

Join me now, my brothers!

By getalife

June 2, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

The lgf used to follow the 48 hour rule to get all the facts but they have gone over the deep end. The reality based community will get the facts like they did on the Miami seven.

Leaping lizards!

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:16 PM | Link to this

So what are you saying Craponlife, LGF is LYING about the JFK episode and none of your HOGWASH diseased liberal monkeybat links not saying a THING about it is a LIE?

Sick, sick, sick.

Oh yeah, and PATHETIC.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 4:17 PM | Link to this

al-Gitmo: I didn’t post my location.

Markus: Any violation of the privacy act that was done using the AJC servers makes them a party to the crime.

I’m sure they won’t need this fully explained to them.

We will find out for sure though once my lawyer gets in Monday.

By Super Sleuth

June 2, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this

Markus: Curly, I think I’ve found a way to crack into the World Pinko Headquarters computer. They have a firewall, NAT and private IPs but I have some very sophisticated software created by Neo Cons Will Rule the World software company. I’m pretty sure I can disguise myself as an authenticated user by using a trojan condom.

Curly: Huh?

Markus: Never mind. Just see if they have any trap doors on the roof.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:26 PM | Link to this

WD-

Like I said earlier, this is nothing new. These wicked serpents have done the same to other blogs and blog hosts like those of LGF, even going so far as using personal email accounts to attempt to tarnish the individual.

What goes around comes around. The hatred these demented twisted individuals on the sick left have for those that say things they don’t agree with is blatant and eventually will be their downfall.

By TrekkieDull

June 2, 2007 4:26 PM | Link to this

This is terrible Andy. Remember the time you all had to get that judge involved when that person pretended to be NeoReo. I hear that guy got 10 years to life for that. Good job.

You wanna play Star Trek later?

DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

By Curly's lawyer

June 2, 2007 4:28 PM | Link to this

You want to do what?! Are you kidding me? You have about as much chance of getting anywhere with this as you do convincing people you know what you’re talking about! In other words, none!

And besides I’m not doing a darned thing for you until you pay for the last embarrassing and frivolous suit you filed and lost!

Grow up and get a life!

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

The trap was set long ago…

And in they fall.

Heh.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this

“Grow up and get a life!”

Now THERE’S the best advice given by a diseased liberal ID poofer yet! HEED YOURSELF YOU SICK LIBERAL FASCIST MONSTER S.T.A.L.K.E.R.!

Sick, sick, sick. MAN how sick.

By Charles Nelson Reilly

June 2, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this

I really resent that other guy taking credit for being the second gunman! Oops! maybe I’ve said too much!

But Curly, for the love of god, can’t you just once give us one of your best, “Hey Moe! Where’s Larry?” Oh you are truly a funny, funny man!

By The New and Improved Warren Commission

June 2, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this

Markus,

Thank you for reporting the blogger at 4:34. We take these reports seriously and will advise you of our findings. However, as this is the seventeenth report filed by you recently, we are growing a bit skeptical.

Regards, The ghost of Gerald Ford

By TrekkieDull

June 2, 2007 4:41 PM | Link to this

Oh Markus just wait. These Liberals are going to be beamed up to a planet that is inhabited by 25,000,000,000,000 Nancy Pelosi’s blinking their eyes CONSTANTLY.

Libs, looks like I’m winning.

DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:43 PM | Link to this

Look. Any time a diseased liberal RAT gets personal, you know you’ve given them the beat down. It’s all good. Listen to these pathetic manic obsessive freaks from hell representative of the diseased left. They can’t even SLEEP at night knowing this blog is here. I’ll bet you a cool grand one or more DREAM about this blog.

They won’t shut the F up until all Conservative voice and outlets are quelled, which will NEVER happen, much to their miserable liberal dismay. Most are too gutless to even admit that which they wish for, but a few jackasses like God’s Trash mouth off enough to decipher their intentions.

Zombies.

By TrekkieDull

June 2, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

Hey WootenDull, I know a good lawyer. He’s from the planet Glipich, but he’s cheap.

DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this

Considering todays events at JFK, anyone curious about Guyana? I am.

…the region’s small but diverse and dynamic ethnic Arab and Muslim communities have come under increasing scrutiny by local and international security officials. Al-Qaeda’s documented international success in winning ideological sympathizers to its cause is one point of concern. Osama bin Laden’s ability to inspire sympathizers with no direct links to al-Qaeda to act independently and take action in furthering their own radical agendas through the use of violence in their home countries and elsewhere also raises alarm bells. Given al-Qaeda’s ability to lure certain Islamic converts to its cause, growing Muslim conversion trends in the region are also raising fears among some observers about the nature and intentions of Muslim converts…Despite its modest population, Guyana boasts one of the largest percentages of Muslims out of its total population in the Western hemisphere. It is also a member of the Organization of the Islamic Conference.

It is important to note that there is no substantive evidence to date pointing to a nascent radical threat in Guyana. Guyana did make headlines, however, when local sources reported sightings of Adnan G. El Shukrijumah in the region in 2003, a known al-Qaeda operative whose whereabouts remain unknown.

Remember him?

By A better mousetrap

June 2, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

Markus: Dammit Lucky! I’m not losing yet another finger in this damned contraption!

LuckoDull: But Funky Bunch, why do you keep screwing with those things all of the time when you know that you’re going to get hurt?

Markus: Be very quiet. I’m trying to catch pinkos!

Elmer Fudd: Morons.

By WootenDull

June 2, 2007 4:53 PM | Link to this

Yes, I’m sure that the AJC will defend Polly’s right to gay bash on their political blogs and they will ignore the threat of a subpoena.

Uh-huh.

Most executives chart those kinds of courses for their companies.

By @@

June 2, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

TrekkieDull:

This is terrible Andy. Remember the time you all had to get that judge involved when that person pretended to be NeoReo. I hear that guy got 10 years to life for that. Good job.

I’m gonna have to assume that you were one of the lowlifes that engaged in that abhorrent display of cruelty.

Of course you are. You’re a liberal. That was an evening that no decent human being should have been engaged in, but you seem to take great pride in it.

I’ll borrow from Markus again when I say to you…

SICK SICK SICK and oh so proud of it too.

That night Andy was on the side of all decent individuals; Getalife included.

You were obviously part of the pond scum, up from the primordial ooze.

Tell me, is this you? or is it Midori?

By Markus

June 2, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

Meanwhile back at the ranch,

Dirty Harry Reid said:

I think it would be a real tragedy if we tried to make this immigration debate one dealing with terrorism.

Now you just KNOW the very FIRST illegal immigrant islamofascist who would set off a dirty nuke in this country would be blamed on Bush by the diseased left because he didn’t tie illegal Mexican immigration to a terrorist threat due to uncontrolled borders. What posers.

Sick, sick, sick.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 4:58 PM | Link to this

Here’s a little news from Trinidad, going back to 2005.

This guy is like an Islamic mobster, demanding a personal tithe…or else.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 4:59 PM | Link to this

Somebody has been watching Carlos Mencia.

Andy,

Duh

You will lose.

By TrekkieDull

June 2, 2007 4:59 PM | Link to this

You know whats weird WootenDull? The word “subpoena” in Klingon means “Play that funky music white boy.”

DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

By APB

June 2, 2007 5:00 PM | Link to this

Danish authorities have issued an alert concerning the break out of Betty/Ben “Buy Danish” Psychotwat earlier today.

Psychotwat is thought to be traveling to the Atlanta, Georgia area where he/she is known to frequent area swimming pools. He/she generally wears a bight pink two piece suit that is several sizes too small and lures children with the promise of heroin-laced lollipops and torturing liberals and atheists.

If you have any information regarding Psychotwat, please do not approach shim, as he/she is considered armed with IEDs and very dangerous. Report any information to local authorities as soon as possible. Thank you.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 5:05 PM | Link to this

Was he an illegal immigrant like the Egyptian who bombed the towers the first time and then Rudy puts a command center in the same towers BD?

What kind of idiot is Rudy?

Geez.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Just DAMN that global walarmbotism. I mean just damn. So does this mean citrus crop imports from Argentina are going to go up? Global warming yet record lows in June near the equator. Man that just sucks. I’m a hysterical believer in global walarmism now. I’ll FREEZE MY @SS OFF because I know somehow, some way, COLD WEATHER is a part of man made global walarmism.

Idiot sheeple bots.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Marcus,

I think Harry Reid is worried that it would be a tragedy for the Democratic Presidential hopefuls.

How nice of him to reveal his innermost thoughts!

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Are you referring to Ramzi Yousef, the nephew of Sheik Khalid “Waterboard” Mohammed, who had an Iraqi passport?

Or are you referring to this Egyptian?

In the course of the trial it was revealed that the FBI had an informant, a former Egyptian army officer named Emad A. Salem. Salem claims to have informed the FBI of the plot to bomb the towers as early as February 6, 1992. Salem’s role as informant allowed the FBI to quickly pinpoint the conspirators out of the hundreds of possible suspects.

Refresh my memory. Who was the President in 1993?

By The Weather Channel

June 2, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

We would like to offer our most sincere apologies to our viewers and sponsors. We have always striven to give our audience the latest and most scientifically accurate information available.

But it has come to our attention that three brilliant AJC bloggers, with no scientific training or background at all, have without question proven that man-induced global warming is a myth.

We offer our most profound thanks to these individuals and in their honor will no longer give forecasts for the left side of the United States.

Warm, er cool regards, TWC

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

Oh well, AM talk radio show hosts get stalked too as well as Republican politicians like George Allen.

Wear it like a badge of honor, like ID jacking, which ironically hasn’t happened today. Just remember you can blow their effin’ heads off if you feel threatened should they have the balls enough to REALLY track you down.

I’m down with that.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:20 PM | Link to this

BD, it doesn’t take much to reveal a RAT’s “innermost thoughts” because they don’t have any other than “It’s America’s fault.”

Just look around on this blog from the representative diseased left as an example.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

Dang - I must be slipping. I forgot that 1993 conspirator Yasin was an Iraqi.

No connections to al qaeda. Nope, move along now. Listen to Rosie. She’s got the real scoops. Building 7 - that’s where the real action is!

By National Geographic

June 2, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

In response to the report from The Weather Channel, we too would like to completely reverse course and admit that our science has been faulty. We defer to the sources cited by TWC and in their honor will henceforth refer to American Universities, recognized worldwide as the bastions of progressive thought and knowledge, by their new name - Conservative Arts and Sciences.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:24 PM | Link to this

Marcus,

I’m only interested in the Reid’s secret strategic concerns.

We now know exactly what to make the immigration debate about, don’t we? Thanks Harry!

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:25 PM | Link to this

Yeah RUN algorebot, RUN! Look at these liberal cage monkeys at a gorebot convention. Then, LOOK at their SUVs.

Awwweeee, I just want to curl up and drive a hybrid now.

“Gore-Obama” stickers? Deranged as Gitmo. Check out the gashogs.

And people want this asshat as president? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

Jackasses.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

Methinks we still have a few sick liberal deniers here who don’t quite understand that last and first names were never revealed on this blog, and most likely nowhere else for that matter.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this

“But it has come to our attention that three brilliant AJC bloggers, with no scientific training or background at all, have without question proven that man-induced global warming is a myth.”

Poofer is at it today. Hey numbnut diseased cage monkey liberal, the links I posted were NOT of my saying, nor were anyone else’s.

Deal with it, class @ssclown.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

More on Yasin the Iraqi. This is from that hornets nest of right wing conspiracy theories, “Answers.com”.

One of seven men indicted for 1993 WTC attack, with full knowledge and approval of US Attorneys involved in the case, Yasin was set free and encouraged to leave the US./Yasin said he was released after giving agents names and addresses, and went to Iraq. /On the very next day, March 5, 1993, Yasin boarded Royal Jordanian flight 262 to Amman, Jordan, the same plane Salameh had failed to catch a week earlier. From Amman, Abdul Rahman Yasin went on to Baghdad. An ABC news stringer saw him there in 1994, outside his father’s house, and learned from neighbors that he worked for the Iraqi government.

In Baghdad, Iraq, Yasin lived freely for at least a year. Pointing to Saddam Hussein regime’s involvement in World Trade Center bombing was “evidence” it gave money and housing to Yasin. The Iraqi government later claimed he was arrested and put in prison (see CBS Stahl interview, below)./On Oct. 10, 2001 Yasin appeared on the initial list of the FBI’s top 22 Most Wanted Terrorists, which was released to the public by President Bush./On several occasions, Iraq offered to turn Yasin over to the US government in exchange for lifting UN economic sanctions. Tariq Aziz, spokesman of Iraq, claimed that in the 1990’s all Iraq wanted in return was a signed statement that Iraq had handed over Yasin. But reportedly the statement presented to the U.S. at the time contained lengthy wording essentially exonerating Iraqi involvement in the 1993 WTC attack. Nevertheless, Kenneth Pollack of the State Department stated that there was no CIA information tying Iraq into the 1993 WTC bombing.

Just another reason to be wary of the CIA and its leftist moles who leak classified info to the NYT and WaPo.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:34 PM | Link to this

“I’m only interested in the Reid’s secret strategic concerns.”

BD, all Dirty Harry cares about is shady land deals in and around Vegas. Remember, it’s Nanny Pelosivich’s “most ethical congress in history” that’s at stake here. Heh. Hehehe. HAHAHA!

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:35 PM | Link to this

Joker at the Weather Channel,

Your own meteorologists don’t believe in Global Warming. I guess you’ve been infiltrated by “fundies and fascists”.

By The Judge

June 2, 2007 5:43 PM | Link to this

Judge: Could you have taken reasonable steps which would have prevented the disclosure of this individual’s privacy?

Queen Pinko: Yes, your Honor, we could have banned Polly.

Judge: But you chose not to.

Queen Pinko: Yes, your Honor, we felt that having a lurker on our political blogs that harasses the other participants, gay bashing them and calling them all kinds of sexually discriminating names was very important facet to conveying that vast liberal intelligence that we wished to display in our family “news” paper.

We like that edgy feel to our political discussions, with trolls that interrupt and call our female Conservatives whor-es and describe them performing sex acts.

Judge: You are Guilty.

Duh.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:44 PM | Link to this

US takes on Somali targets. Well, since Clintoon was too busy getting his pole polished by some ugly intern and tooting his horn (pardon the pun) that we all are at peace, I guess it’s about time we continue to clean up his mess and the mess left by Jimmy “Mr. 444 Days” Carter during his tenure as well. Hell, I can stick my head in the sand and say we don’t have any problems and peace abounds too, but that doesn’t mean the problems magically go away ala Harry FREAKING Potter.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

You know it was Clinton BD.

That is why they got busted.

Where the hell is OBL.

Bwa.

By The world's greatest scientific minds

June 2, 2007 5:48 PM | Link to this

We at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), NOAA, NASA, The EdGCM (Educational Global Climate Modelling) Project, EPA, The Pew Center on global climate change, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Los Alamos National Laboratory, The National Resources Defense Council, The National Oceanographic Data Center, The United Nations World Meteorological Organization, The World Data Center on Greenhouse Gases, The Union of Concerned Scientists and literally countless other organizations and universities across the globe would also like to join in with The National Geographic and The Weather Channel in recognizing the enormous contributions of Mr. Curly, Mr. Dipwad and Mr/Ms. Psychotwat.

We will no longer allow genuine science or the scientific method to influence our understandings but will instead defer to the evidence provided by these vastly more qualified neo-cons.

Sorry.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

WD, a little birdie told me that payback is coming. Be patient.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:51 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I guess you missed the part about the SPECIFIC warning that was not acted upon ahead of time.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

Where’s BL? That’s a GOOD DAMNED QUESTION GITMO.

PHTBTBTBTBTBTBT.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

I will pass on believing anything a neocon has to say.

Not a very good record on being right or honest.

Geez.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

Bloviating weatherman,

Here’s a good website for you that’s filled with links to scholarly articles. If you’re looking for U.N. reports on farting livestock I don’t know if this is the place to go unless it’s to point out how idiotic it is to consider that a threat.

Enjoy!

Global Warming Hysteria Dot Com.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 5:57 PM | Link to this

Oh BD, you know as well as I do that “specific warning” of Flight 93, et. al., never would have happened LET ALONE the Bush Administration being allowed to PROFILE Middle Eastern men from a GENERAL warning.

I’m so sick of those disgusting liberal demonRATs from hell. WAY sick over them.

By The Al Gore Climate Predictions For the Year 3056 Center

June 2, 2007 5:57 PM | Link to this

We formally invite you to our next discussion at the al-Gore CPTY3056 Center, where next Tuesday we will be hosting a conference titled “What Does a Hick From Tennessee Know About The Weather.”

It is an open discussion, all our welcome, cross over the Tennessee border, locate the large plume of smoke coming from our power plant and drive straight at it. Be careful of the coal trucks, the have limited visibilty.

And dress warm cause every time we talk about “global warming” it snows!

By @@

June 2, 2007 5:58 PM | Link to this

Hey National Geographic, I was just over at your site. I love to read there. I brought back some headlines:

Alps Glaciers Gone by 2050, Expert Says (January 23, 2007)

Mountain Glaciers Melting Faster Than Ever, Expert Says (February 16, 2007)

Kilimanjaro’s Glaciers May Last Longer Than Predicted

Hurricanes to Be Sapped, Not Strengthened, by Warming?

More Forests Not Always Good in Fight Against Warming

They go on and on. One article contradicting another.

Scientists and global warming “experts” (cough) need to get on the same page before I buy their “inconvenient truth”.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this

“I will pass on believing anything a neocon has to say. Not a very good record on being right or honest.”

The feeling, Craponlife, is WAY MORE than mutual from your sick liberal diseased ilk including your pathetic self.

Zombie.

By Buy Danish

June 2, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Your record on being “right” is hilariously poor.

Is partial birth abortion a neo-con plot, along with the assertion that there is something known as the Sicilian Mafia?

I don’t know what you believe that isn’t complete and utter nonsense.

Have a nice evening.

By Amnesty For Every One!

June 2, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

{{{Isha Kadir, the Guyanese suspect’s wife, said her husband flew from Guyana to Trinidad on Thursday. She said he was arrested Friday as he was boarding a flight from Trinidad to Venezuela, where he planned to pick up a travel visa to attend an Islamic religious conference in Iran. “We have no interest in blowing up anything in the U.S.,” she said Saturday from the couple’s home in Guyana. “We have relatives in the U.S.”}}}

Oh well good, they weren’t going to blow anything up in the United States, I mean with amnesty so close and all.

Maybe we could get the family here too.

Geez.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

I will not post w’s memo.

Old news, he cut and run to invade and occupy Iraq.

History will tell this story.

You can’t change the facts.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

“Gore” 5:57, HILARIOUS! Best post O’day!

Stupid neoStalinist liberal sheeple.

By @@

June 2, 2007 6:05 PM | Link to this

…and then there’s all the “ancient” news from National Geographic, with a rainfall prediction.

Ancient “Megadroughts” Struck U.S. West, Could Happen Again, Study Suggests

Ancient Climate Change Rocked Tibetan Cultures, Research Suggests

Global Warming Models Underpredict Increase in Rainfall, Study Says

As Getalife would say…

Geez!

By Markus

June 2, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

That’s RIGHT Craponlife, history WILL tell the story. Unfortunately for filthy mangy diseased liberals like your pathetic self, you want to CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY while it’s STILL IN THE WRITING PHASE because BUSH is in charge of it. FREAKING PATHETIC.

Bah. You sick people on the left mean nothing really. Dead air. Worthless. Meaningless. Walking dead. Zombies.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

No such thing BD.

Good evening.

By TWC

June 2, 2007 6:08 PM | Link to this

Ms. Pyschotwat,

Your contention that our climatologists do not promote the scientifically accurate theory of man-induced global warming is incorrect.

We do strive to provide information from both sides of the argument but have found that the neo-cons and flat-earth society cannot fully grasp the science anyway, nor have they ever contributed to the world’s prosperity in any meaningful way.

Therefore although it may appear to you that we don’t endorse the scientific method, we simply cannot allow dirtbags and uneducated buffoons to overly influence the argument to resolve one of the great problems facing mankind.

Regards, TWC

By Markus

June 2, 2007 6:11 PM | Link to this

Kindly note how no filthy hysterical overestrogened scaredypants liberal has refuted ONE LINK today that refutes the LIE of man made global walarmbotism. NOT ONE.

Cowards.

By Markus

June 2, 2007 6:16 PM | Link to this

“We simply cannot allow dirtbags and uneducated buffoons to overly influence the argument to resolve one of the great problems facing mankind.”

Likewise, we will not allow communist wannabe FINALLY religious (albeit CULTIST) liberals to influence our daily lifestyles for their twisted unproven religion.

Come to my house and tell me I can’t grill with charcoal, you deranged punk liberal nazi.

By getalife

June 2, 2007 7:08 PM | Link to this

As far as links go, may I suggest this one.

It says it all and Mr. Gore shows true leadership to take to the G8.

How about those protestors there in Germany? They love w.

Geez.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this

getalife,

It looks like these same people hated W before they ever heard of him.

U.S. politics did its part, too, to block progress. President Bill Clinton, trying to shore up support for Vice-President Al Gore, made an unhelpful opening speech about labour standards that upset just about every developing country.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

{If we could only get back to the Billy Jeff years things would be rosy around the G8 summits.](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/july-dec00/g8.html)

By The BlogFather

June 3, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

GodBlogger here. The same people who are dissin’ global warming also be dissin’ the TB epidemic, and they all be dissin’ the juvenile cervical cancer vaccine. Science, watson, Science.

It’s a great temptation to cheer when a terror plot is foiled, until we realize that this plot was impossible from the start, and the imbedded informants probably elicited evidence the way social workers goad young children into remembering alleged molestation. I dont believe a word of it. Anyone can concoct a ridiculous plot and brag about it. You know, I could take a den of cub scouts armed only with slingshots and capture Osama Bin Laden tomorrow……

It falls upon the cooler heads to point out that there is no credible blogging support for Bush (or the Right), left on the internecine internetz. (internetz?) can you use that word in a sentence mister bush? Is there an alternate pronunciation? What is the language of origin? Internetz. Internetz. I….N…T….E….R….N….E…T…s….DING….(too bad, you’re eliminated from the idiot club, you should have picked the word, “potatoe”)

By Buy Danish

June 3, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

An inconvenient truth for the Goreacles:

In An Inconvenient Truth, the polar bear drowning on a sole melting piece of ice moved a lot of people and public and political pressure encouraged the US Fish and Wildlife Service to add polar bears as “threatened” animals to the endangered species list./In 2002, the US Geological Survey in the Arctic Refuge Coastal plain reported the polar bear population was near historic highs. Biologist Mitchell Taylor of the Arctic community of Nunavit who tracks 13 of those colonies, says 11 are stable or thriving with populations that have increased 25%./There are approximately 19 worldwide polar bear populations, the Fish and Wildlife action was based solely on reviewing data for only one of those populations in western Hudson Bay which has declined by 259 bears in last 17 years.———-> The decline is due to hunting to prevent overpopulation and ironically the Canadian government is looking to increase the quota.<———- (US Geological Survey in Arctic Refuge Coastal Plain 2002, and Dr. Mitchell Taylor, Polar Bear Biologist, Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut , Igloolik , Nunavut , Canada “Last Stand of our wild polar bears” 5/1/06)

By Buy Danish

June 3, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

If the Goreacle’s dreams came true and CO2 output declined, what could happen?

A goodly portion of earth’s plants and animals should actually expand their ranges and gain a stronger foothold on the planet as the atmosphere’s temperature and CO2 concentration continue to rise. If the air’s CO2 content were suddenly to stop increasing, however, the biosphere could find itself facing a significant challenge, as the world’s plants would cease acquiring the extra physiological protection against heat stress that is afforded them by rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Consequently, the end result of curtailing anthropogenic CO2 emissions might well be just the opposite of what many people are hoping to accomplish by encouraging that policy, —————->i.e., many species might actually be driven to extinction, rather than being saved from such a fate.<—————-

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this

Blogfather here. The must see sunday round table are about to start. Please watch and learn something. Then resist blogging until you’ve had a couple nights to digest it. Then maybe you’ll have an original unhacked insight. But the odds are that Schmuckodull will post to himself the all day sucker punches only his hands can inflict on himself. He falls for his own gaffed hack-jab every time. (and this with one hand in his pocket). He even argues with himself with aliases, so that he can win the argument. Pathos is not pretty.

Insight: When one looks at the last three “foiled” terror plots, one sees an accelerating desperation either in the terrorists, or the story tellers. First, there were these guys trying to raise an entire army and trying to buy uniforms, compasses, binoculars and boots. Then, even more diabolical terrorists were going to storm an army base. Oh brother. Now, we’ve got a Godzilla style plot to blow up half of the big apple with machine pistols unt panzergrenadiers.

What was the smoking gun going to be, a cigar? “what happened, frank?” “Well, Bill, we had the approaches to the fuel depot covered, but some guy dressed as a proud father offered the pipeline a lit cigar and kaboom. We just didn’t see that one coming. I wonder if it was a girl or a boy.”

Did you know that on Dec. 7, 1941, the wide open oil reservoirs were completely ignored by the Japs? Real war geniuses. They didn’t even have radar. can you imagine that? no radar. and they couldn’t fathom that we’d crack their secret code so soon, and be waiting for them six months later at midway. the painted their carrier decks bright yellow. the arrogance! This is just like Schmockdork. He just doesn’t get it, and thinks he can make a difference with hundreds of harmless comments all day. the Z is for Zero. (japanese zero)

dorka dorka dorka

By Buy Danish

June 3, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

Moonbats sure are gullible creatures and easily susceptible to the apocalypse tales of charlatans:

Gore claims that sea level rise could drown the Pacific islands, Florida, major cities the world over, and the 9/11 Memorial in New York City./———->Sea level has been rising at a rate of 1.8 mm per year for the past 8,000 years.<———-The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” Unless there is another Little Ice Age, they will continue rising at roughly this rate for centuries to come. As to open water in the Arctic, it happens every year in late summer—following weeks in the 40s and 50s.

By Buy Danish

June 3, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

Is the debate over?

Here are some of The experts. who “support an objective consideration and an earnest and open discussion of all aspects of climate change.”

Are you going to listen to them or the Warming Sisters, whose credentials are>>>>>>>>>>>????????????????????

None!

By getalife

June 3, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

The debate is idiotic.

If Gore is wrong, we still need to clean up pollution, alternative energy to wean our addiction to oil and make the world a better place for the future generations.

If he is right, the people living in the areas effected have been warned and can leave.

What is there to debate?

By Markus

June 3, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this

“It’s a great temptation to cheer when a terror plot is foiled, until we realize that this plot was impossible from the start”

Hey numbnuts. The government said the same thing about hijacking airliners and crashing them into “tall buildings” in 1998. Read much jackass?

“The must see sunday round table are about to start. Please watch and learn something. Then resist blogging until you’ve had a couple nights to digest it.”

The hell for, Stalininist liberal jackal? So I can watch a powderpuff like Steppedonanoctopus or Matthpews or former RAT lobbyist Russert Potato head swoon at their RAT guests and sniff their underwear? So I can be indoctrinated to think RAT? Pardon my French, but I don’t F^^KING think so.

By JK

June 3, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

Getalife, Great point! I’ve been trying in vain to make it myself. Even “Bi-fruitcakes” and the likes cannot deny that we are polluting the air, water, and land, and are also squandering precious life-sustaining resources at an alarming rate. They also have no logical argument against moving forward, technologically, to develop better, cleaner ways of doing things, and that such innovations could very well lead to economic prosperity as these new solutions are patented, shared, sold, and put to good use.

They claim to be uber-patriots, and proponents of propserity, but their refusal to discuss progress of any kind tells me that (a) they care nothing for the future of this country, and (b) they care deeply only about “winning” arguments to appease their own egos, even if it’s a completly irrelevant argument.

All they have is their same ol’ mantra: “You lefties are soooooo stuuuuuupid!” You’re right: there is no debate.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

You communist wannabe diseased liberals ride a bike to work/store, stick a windmill in your backyard, drill a hole for water, and put solar panels on your roofs. Then cut all your utilities and S-T-F-U already about the LIE of man made global walarmism.

Ram it up your own @sses, collectivist fascist pigs.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this

The ID Poofer God’s TrashBlogger is one of those jackass liberals that would pin Bush no matter what he did. “Gee, that wasn’t a real terrorist plot.” Then out his other @ss, “Bush didn’t do enough to stop a terrorist attack on this nation.”

Meaningless. Useless. Dead. Rotten to the core. Zombie.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

getalife,

That deranged old fool that looks like your Granddad is going to be on with Snuffalufagus this morning.

JK,

Most conservatives I know would like to switch most of our power generation to nuclear and work on development of hydrogen fuel cells for automobiles.

Would you prefer to burn extra oil to make biofuels while starving third world countries by driving up the price of corn based products?<————that’s rhetorical as I won’t be around to discuss it.

By getalife

June 3, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this

JK,

I think we need to debate immigration.

They love amnesty.

Bwa.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

“Would you prefer to burn extra oil to make biofuels while starving third world countries by driving up the price of corn based products?”

RW, now you know as well as I that one of the requisites of the disease of liberalism is acting before thinking and not sweating those pesky details. It’s all about hysterical emotionalism much like a woman during a certain time. Liberals have too much estrogen. That’s why their sick, twisted, demented ideology is emotion driven.

Don’t look now, but our very own Queen Pinko of the Al Jazeera Constipation (literally with her suit this morning), Ms. Tucker, is on Softballs Matthews.

By kill a leftist for the future of mankind

June 3, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

Immediately forcibly deporting all illegal leeches would massively reduce all kinds of pollution, certainly visual, air, noise and freeloading/moral pollution. A few well targeted cruise missiles fired at the likes of treasonous SOREos funded moveyourbowles.org and other filthy leftist vermin like code pinko, any “stop the war” scum and the sick and twisted eco whacko liars and distorters gathered at their Hollywood cocaine sniffing hate Bush fests would also do the trick in the hate America yankkkee cesspits and west coast freakshow social leper colonies.

The NSA should aggressively target ALL the treasonous unpatriotic leftist cowards who systematically blog their daily hate America poison - the likes of maggotbrain, aborted foreskin and rednekkks NAMBLA need to be dumped back in Cuba by the USAF, without a functioning parachute of course.

Basically the nation needs to free itself from the cancer of liberalism, multi-cultural pandering, the deranged bleating demanding amnesty for illegal leeches, illegal racist quotas and racial spoils that benefits any single race and so on.

The best headline the NY Slimes could ever print would be:

TODAY TRUE AMERICANS EVERYWHERE CELEBRATE THE LONG OVERDUE DEATH AND IRREVOCABLE ERADICATION OF LIBERALISM

By Markus

June 3, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

Watching Murthabat on that RAT Snafulapholus, I have come to the conclusion that another sickness of the disease of liberalism is senility. Karter’s been senile since 1977.

Notice how no liberal cage monkey complains about the jackass leftist bias and domination on the Sunday morning talk shows. When liberal RATs don’t b!tch, something is wrong. VERY wrong.

By JH

June 3, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

There are two reasons why these neocons, who desperately pose as conservative, so stridently support the poisoning and ruining of the natural world. And sadly, not even one of them has ever refuted this. Instead they mindlessly contend that scientific data that demonstrates rampant pollution and the complete destruction of habitats and species worldwide is overblown or mere “junk science”. And even if it does exist, certainly mankind has no role in it, right?

I’m outta here for the day but will check back later for possible answers from our friends/fiends on the far right fringe.

BTW to all of you blogging dorks who live here all day long, seven days a week - what the hell is the matter with you people? Have you such empty little lives that this is your primary entertainment? My goodness, there is a great big beautiful world out there! Step away for your emachines and enjoy it before the neo-cons completely ruin everything!

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

BlogFather here.

Would a million surrender monkeys blogging on a million capitulation-locked keyboards for a million years produce the Recently Embraced Baker Hamilton Iraq War Report? W is now firmly entrenched in the Democratic Position on the War from about 18 months ago. A position thats no longer grounded in any reality on the ground. The Right is coming around, but as slowly as the Titanic did when it spotted that Sunni Iceberg.

Insight: The pendulum of flip-flopping and the cycle of molly-coddling with the terrorists swings to the far right and away from the sober leftists who gaze at the abyss which defines the destiny of the Iraq War…..

FACT: There is no credible surrender monkey support blogging for Bush (or the Right), left on the internetz today.

By getalife

June 3, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

Yes, run another w gop

Make it easier to change direction.

By Buy Danish

June 3, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

Getalife, JK, and other fools,

Oh, I get it. You finally acknowledge how foolish and unscientific the concept of “Global Warming” is so now you’ve moved the goal posts, but you can’t resist demonizing the people who have been pointing out how ludicrous the concept is in the first place.

I just love the way you assume that all conservatives are “polluters” and you’re not.

I’m off to the pool for the day.

Watch your carbon footprints!

By getalife

June 3, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

Your right BD.

No global warming, keep polluting and buying oil from the ME.

Screw the future.

Idiot.

By TW

June 3, 2007 12:41 PM | Link to this

Which one of you nazis was the one giving Lukovich a hard time for not having up a new blog last weekend?

By The Surreal Logic of Markanus Idiotus

June 3, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

..one of the requisites of the disease of liberalism is acting before thinking and not sweating those pesky details..

Unlike the well-planned, skillfully executed war in Iraq.

It’s all about hysterical emotionalism much like a woman during a certain time.

Be afraid! Fear anyone who is different from you! Islam hates us! Bomb them! We have to spend billions on a war with people who never attacked us, or they will follow us HOME! Aaaahhhh! Aaaahhhhh! Give up your constitutional rights NOW so we can protect you from the boogie man!

By getalife

June 3, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

He is a coward, pure and simple.

By Mrs. RepubLady

June 3, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

Global warming is junk science, pure and simple. So is evolution. Any librale dummy who believes in them is a moron. Get an education you simpeltons! Of course, creashunism is exact science. One God, seven days, no monkeys, Amen.

Buy Danish, I will be at your house in 20 minutes to pick you up for our weekly pedecure and trip to the Cheesecake Factory. Calories dont count on Sundays. Oink oink!

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 1:06 PM | Link to this

The liberals better keep their mits off Romney. His Unterverrin is truly a shield, and I like his chances. If cheney can have a gay progeny then Mitt can have 14 wives. It’s only fair. The recent passing of the Teletubbies Biggest Critic has left a moral vacuum on the right which Romney can fill as well as any of the others.

“I wish to marry ALL your daughters. This one and that one and the little one over there…..” Mitt had to ask for his father-in-laws permission to take the hands across america quantity of his daughters hands in marriage. One gets the image of that Indian god (Hindu? no, Handu*), with all those arms which was made famous in a classic three stooges sketch. (You knew instantly that the slap sound effects guy was getting overtime pay for his work during that bit).

• how about Handsoff!

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

Sharapova in DEEP TROUBLE live on NBC. Her unworthy opponent is serving for the match now. Dont miss this.

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 1:25 PM | Link to this

WOW! The only thing better than Sharapova on the tennis court would be Sharapova in prison for 45 days. you do know that they wear virtually nothing underneath those prison uniforms…..

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

Sharapova: pure femininity; part Veronica Mars, part Paris Hilton, all woman. I’ve always said that if Paris Hilton could play championship tennis, we’d have a queen every bit as royal as England’s.

Sharapova is so sexy when she’s so vulnerable during a match. This is like the greatest TV since I saw a rerun of Seabiscuit.

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this

History is being made folks. Oh the humanity. At stake is none other than international diplomacy. Forget the Iraq War…This is no longer a tennis match. This is life itself….

By getalife

June 3, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this

Amnesty

Bwa.

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

This was sensational. This was collosal. This was stupendous. The greatest moment in the history of sports. Sharapova pulls out an impossible win from a determined near-fiend.

I love Sharapova. I am in love. We all are, I know, but not one of you has imagined her serving 45 days in prison like I have. I had her incarcerated FIRST!!!

And I hope I dont have to remind anyone about how they dont wear hardly nuthin ‘neath them prison gowns, do I?

Moment of lustful silence please…………….yes!

I am writing a song for Sharapova. Then I’m writing a poem, then a novella, then I’m going to do an entire 45 minute set on stage at a comedy club talking about nothing but her.

Sharapova. Our Queen.

Okay, but how HOT was that Schnyder gal, her opponent. Did anyone catch the beaver shot, no kidding, at the end of the match. The camera zeroed in on Schnyder bending over, from behind, and her short skirt revealed pure heaven, pure heaven, I’m sure some local laws were broken, perhaps a strict ordinance or two, so I’m proposing 45 days in prison for Schnyder too.

You do realize that they wear virtually nuthin’ ‘neath them prison gowns, (especially in France).

Moment of lustful silence………..YES!!!

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

That beaver shot of Schnyder at the French Open…..i guess they dont wear nuthin’ ‘neath those tennis outfits…..Luckily I tivo’d it….it’s a good thing Al Gore, the environmental guy wasn’t there, or he’d been upset if he saw anyone shooting a beaver that way…..I’m not kidding here, this happened, the woman was putting her gear away and she bent way over, you know how they do, and the camera happened to be in the correct angle as her skirt hiked up her buns revealing the promised land from behind in maybe the best shot I’ve ever seen of Jerry Mathers as the Beaver. (porn or no porn this was art)! I’m never gonna be the same. The French, you see, the French have a particular genius with the beaver shot, you see, and we americans have no chance….It’s gonna take me a year to get over this….

Too bad Schmuckodork is gay, or he’d be checking it out on U Tube right now……The greatest ever vision of the beaver ever seen by mortal men, hands down, I cant even stand it…..a total bullseye, struck me down, right between the eyes…..whew…overheating here…….

Schmuckodill: what a total schmue.

Honestly.

Duh, I’m gonna blog all day every day for ten years, duh…..

RETARD!

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 4:11 PM | Link to this

BlogFather here, you know I’d surely accept a Matriarchy w/Paris Hilton as our Queen (IF she could pose in tennis outfits the way that French Woman just did at the Open). It would be better than the Monkeyarchy we suffer now, my friends.

By Claire Ellis, Atlanta

June 3, 2007 4:26 PM | Link to this

Jim: My thirteen year old son has taken a healthy interest in civics and pays a lot of attention to the goings on of local and state government. It may just be a fad but right now he is pretty serious. He likes to read your columns, as he puts it, you are one of the few in Atlanta that don’t blame everything on America.

He started to follow your blog, and noticed that there does seem to be an effort at some thoughtful and informative discussions on it.

As he pointed out to me and as I voice my concern to you, what is the point of letting bloggers have one way discussions with themselves about, for instance, the private anatomy of certain female tennis players?

Is this really necessary? Is there nothing you can do about it? I notice that it seems to be one person that uses several different screen names and stays here posting most of the day.

It just seems like you should desire to have a blog that would elevate itself above this mundane coarseness and just stick to back and forth debates of the issues of the day.

Thanks for listening,

Claire.

By Sailor

June 3, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

the sailor said Andi/e, you’re a fine girl…

You guys really upset my gal yesterday. She’s really really scared - won’t come out from under the bed today.

Except to be fed. ;>

By GodHatesTrash

June 3, 2007 4:51 PM | Link to this

Ms. Ellis, if you think Mr. Wooten’s Thinking Right is a good website for your impressionable son, may I suggest you’d also enjoy stormfront.org or kkk.com?

The conservative social and political commentary on those sites is quite similar, and just as intellectually rigorous.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 5:09 PM | Link to this

By GodHatesTrash

June 3, 2007 4:51 PM | Link to this Ms. Ellis, if you think Mr. Wooten’s Thinking Right is a good website for your impressionable son, may I suggest you’d also enjoy stormfront.org or kkk.com?

F you God’s Trash. You are BY FAR the most vile disgusting sub human on this blog. You are nothing. You are a waste of carbon footprint. You are amongst the walking dead that means nothing. You are obsessed with those who don’t GOOSE STEP along with your nazi-wannabe diseased liberal neoStalinist fascist ideology.

You are and those who you represent everything that is wrong with this nation.

You filthy disgusting queefbag from hell.

By For the Record ...

June 3, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this

Just out of curiosity — Conservatives — what is your favorite Shakespeare history play, and why?

My bets:

Markus: “Who? Oh yeah. The English guy. Duh .. Henry V, where they kill all those French pinkos.”

Dusty: “Henry IV Part 1. I think that Falstaff guy is … you know … kinda sexy!”

Andy: “Richard III. Deformed and evil. We stick together!”

Jmblaw: “Richard II. A poet, yes, but he got what he deserved, given that irrational tax policy.”

TFTT: “Henry VI (1), because that wanker Joan of Arc was a liberal Frenchy witch ‘ho!”

By Markus

June 3, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Answer ID Poof:

None of your effin’ business. You sick diseased liberals have done enough of getting personal.

Let me know if you need me to spell it out better, you disgusting sub human pile of twisted liberal sheet.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 5:30 PM | Link to this

This just makes me want to join the Jim Jones Kool Aid disease of liberalism and the LIE of man made global walarmism.

Within the world of carbon trading, there are numerous cases of projects which are widely regarded as breaking CDM rules. Some of them existed long before the CDM project was launched: if they do happen to be producing fewer greenhouse gases, that is the natural state and not a reduction which can be claimed and sold. Yet, such schemes have been validated by specialist companies and accepted by the CDM board; and the companies running them have been allowed to earn large amounts of money by selling unjustified Certified Emissions Reductions.

Stick that^^ up your Stalinist noses, diseased HIDE UNDER THE BED FROM GLOBAL WARMING liberal monkeybots.

GOD you people on the sick left are pathetic.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 5:39 PM | Link to this

Hey queefbag liberal ID poof, for the record with your sick twisted holier than thou liberal nazism, I will tell you that I was one of the lucky people to see Yuliy Borisovich Brynner in a performance of “The King And I.”

Can you barefoot waterski jackass?

Poof.

By For the Record ...

June 3, 2007 5:47 PM | Link to this

Markus, have you ever seen a live performance of a Shakespeare play? Aren’t you from Alabama? Why haven’t you taken your kids to the Alabama Shakespeare Festival in Montgomery?

Don’t you want them to grow up to be civilized adults?

By Markus

June 3, 2007 5:52 PM | Link to this

Hey sickassed liberal ID poof: do you NOT know when to SHUT UP?

To answer your question, no, I’m not from AL. It’s always nice to throw you diseased stalker libs off the trail.

Can’t find me, can you, liberal human waste?

By Markus

June 3, 2007 5:54 PM | Link to this

Diseased liberals complain about Cons “hogging” this blog on the weekend and look what happens? Our sick compulsive resident candyassed liberals watch over it like vultures while we Cons go out and enjoy life. Or in my case, burn gas in a lake and cause man made global walarmbotism.

How many different ways to Sunday can we define hypocrisy from the pathetic neoMarxist left?

By Buy Danish

June 3, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Do you or do you not believe that CO2 emissions are a threat to the planet?

Do you or do you not think we should be a signatory to Kyoto?

I’m not the one who started this ridiculous fad - I merely find scientists who argue against it.

Conservatives are far more aggressive in pursuing options to ease our dependence on ME oil. Envirowackos stop us at every turn.

One difference between the Moonbats and me is that I don’t reside in the fever swamps, and I have a realistic view of what is possible at this point in time, and what is not.

I’d like nothing better than to tell the Saudis to find someone else to buy their oil. We’re not their yet.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

Hey diseased liberal ID poof:

Can you swap out a clutch?

Can you ski double diamonds?

Can you skydive?

Can you ride horses?

See you nazi wannabe fascist pig, YOUR WAY OF LIFE ENJOYMENT MAY NOT REFLECT THOSE OF OTHERS.

Fascist pig.

By For the Record ...

June 3, 2007 6:05 PM | Link to this

Markus: look, cousin, I’ve got you pegged for being blue collar all the way. So was I — my Dad was a manual laborer all his life — until some elite New England school “hired” me to play linebacker for them, never for a moment believing I could graduate from their institution.

That was four college degrees ago.

I’m saying that you don’t have to be the way you are. Ugly. Bitter. Savage.

You can do better. You can be better.

Do it for your children’s sake.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 6:11 PM | Link to this

Has anyone else noticed that the disease of liberalism includes brilliant talking points such as: “HAVE YOU SEEN A SHAKESPEARE PLAY???”

Man, that’s deep.

Sick, sick, sick.

By Markus

June 3, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this

In other words, any time a sick twisted liberal asked you about “The Arts” if you don’t answer then you are an idiot and “un cultured.” Never mind these same twisted hypocrites never ask public edumacation brilliant kids who the hell was president during the start of WWII and what the freaking Preamble said.

Priorities of the disgusting left, I suppose. Kinda like Chris Jackass Matthews who asked Romney or some other Republican what the price of a gallon of milk is. Hell I only buy in HALF gallons and have NO clue, Chris, does that make me an IDIOT? Hey Chris, how much does one bunch of asparagus cost?

Dumb@ssed liberals and a dumb@ssed nazi-like philosophy of holier-than-thou goose-stepping fascism.

By The GodBlogger

June 3, 2007 10:05 PM | Link to this

BlogFather here. Another masterpiece from The Supranos tonite.