Thinking Right

By Georgia Rednecks Terrorize the World

May 6, 2007 8:38 AM | Link to this

A VP named Sonny Perdoofus? Shiite!

By GOP Pack of Jackals

May 6, 2007 8:43 AM | Link to this

The GOP used to stand for progress. Look at the collection of misanthrope morons they paraded in front of us at the debate - 30% are too stupid to even believe in evolution.

All of them stupid enough to think we can ‘win’ in Iraq.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 8:46 AM | Link to this

Jim: After the victory in Iraq is complete later this summer, the GOP could get Daffy Duck elected president.

And when you factor in the “competition,” if you can call it that, we could lose the war and still win the election.

This is gonna be a cakewalk.

You libs are gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{A popular Egyptian blogger known for his withering criticisms of the government has given up writing after becoming the latest victim of a state crackdown on dissent. In February, Abdel Kareem Nabil, 22, a former student at Egypt’s Islamic Al Azhar University, was jailed for four years for insulting Islam and Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, on his blog.}}}

Huh, the sniveling Coward liberals want to silence bloggers and the Islamic fascists do silence bloggers. Like two peas in a pod.

Ain’t that right, al Gitmo?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{In the town of Kut, 100 miles southeast of Baghdad, a roadside bomb outside a teacher’s house killed three of his children, all of them under the age of 10, police said. The parents were not injured in the attack.}}}

Congratulations, liberals, you sniveling Cowards, this is you^^, these are the things that Al Qaeda does to help you in your battle to surrender to them, you should be so proud.

You and Al Qaeda suck.

Heavy.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{French election may affect abductees. A purported Taliban spokesman said militants in Afghanistan will decide the fate of a kidnapped French aid worker and three Afghan colleagues after today’s French elections.}}}

Look at this^^, the cut throats are waiting to see if the surrender monkey gets elected.

That wingnut might bomb them if he gets elected, I’m sure they don’t want that.

And the Urinal prints this slop trying to extort the results of the election that they want, sniveling punk as-s Cowards. Enemy propaganda mouthpieces.

Scumbags.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{In a new video posted today on the Internet, al Qaeda’s number two man, Ayman al Zawahiri, mocks the bill passed by Congress setting a timetable for the pullout of U.S. troops in Iraq. Continuing in the same tone, Zawahiri says, “We ask Allah that they only get out of it after losing 200,000 to 300,000 killed, in order that we give the spillers of blood in Washington and Europe an unforgettable lesson.”}}}

Bush has reduced this clown to a joke posting quack videos from his cave, so of course our sniveling cowards in the US Congress throw him a bone.

What else you want to tell the enemy, troop locations and the like?

Cowards.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

Define yourselves, democrats:

{{{leaders of the liberal group MoveOn.org, including Tom Matzzie, the group’s Washington director…. said Medea Benjamin, a co-founder of Code Pink…..Many of the major players in Americans Against Escalation in Iraq…….the national director of Win Without War……Mr. Woodhouse, of Americans United for Change……..“On this, we want to be perfectly clear: if Democrats appear to capitulate to Bush — passing a bill without measures to end the war — the unity Democrats have enjoyed and Democratic leadership has so expertly built, will immediately disappear.”}}}

This is who you are, Kooks R Us, driving the lib herd over the cliff.

Need any help?

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{Former President Bill Clinton said Friday that disasters such as worldwide famine and an obesity epidemic could destroy the U.S. health care system unless politicians begin to look ahead and cooperate.}}}

Famine and Obesity?

This coming from Chubby and his chubby legged “wife.”

There must be some lobbyist he wants to score with.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By I Voted for the War Even Though I'm a Coward

May 6, 2007 8:47 AM | Link to this

These guys all represent me fine. Especially Giuliani - s/he looks great in a dress.

So do I.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By KKKonservative Kool-Aid

May 6, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this

Wooten’s been drinking again if he thinks any of these morons are electable.

And the part about Sonny Perdue? Hilarious.

Could the GOP find an uglier stupider looking cracker to be their VP candidate?

I don’t think so…

By Queen of the Blog

May 6, 2007 9:04 AM | Link to this

We post every day, all day. We are Queen Andi.

Conservatives, We kneel before you as your beautiful flaming Queen.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By Mid-South Philosopher

May 6, 2007 9:08 AM | Link to this

Good morning, Jim,

It is unfair. It is not right. It is a strange twist of fate and probably a loss to the nation, but to nominate Jeb Bush for the Vice Presidency in 2008 and probably in 2012 would be suicide for the ticket.

The Bush dynasty, like the Adams’s line before it, has exhausted the American people. Oh, the corporatists and the religious fanatics would love it, but the majority of the American people, as George Herbert Walker Bush rightly understands, has Bush fatigue.

Jeb Bush, who is head and shoulders smarter than Georgie, is a victim of the incompetence of his brother’s administration. It is too bad.

In my judgment, Fred Thompson is only Republican with a real chance in 2008, but, as you rightly understand, he needs to get off the pot and run.

I don’t think Newt can carry the day.

Rudi is just too liberal “socially, albeit, he may have the best record in the *War on Islamic Fanaticism.

Mitt is infected with the John Kerry Flip-Flop Syndrome.

I suspect we need to get set for 4 years for Democrats (God help us)!

On another matter, I favor the subpoena of Secretary Rice before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, IF the information is used to identify and hold accountable, possibly by loss of jobs, of those people who gave President incorrect intelligence regarding stockpiling of WMDs by Saddam Hussein. If it is just a bash Bush party, there is no reason to put Condi through it. She is too good a bushie.

By Cornshucks

May 6, 2007 9:38 AM | Link to this

CNN ran a report last night about the improvement in the security in Anbar Province, where the surge has chased all the terrorists away. There were implications that the war in Iraq has turned the corner and victory is assured, in due time. CNN didn’t offer an explanation about where the terrorists went, but did suggest that the shieks (village leaders) are finally realizing that they have to fight al queda and get over their natural disdain for invaders and occupiers. These Sunnis have come to understand that Peace and Prosperity is actually a good thing. So much for the Sunni Insurgency. If we were to pick a side today, it would definitely be these suddenly rational Sunnis, even though the elected government in Iraq is mostly Shia. At some point, it appears that we WILL have to pick a side. McCain’s support for the war reads as an admission that a Bungling Bush Broke Iraq, and no sane person would premptively withdraw and cause the collapse of civilization as the arabs knew it. I guess we’ll have to overthrow just one more government. I dont see a problem at all. Bush WILL go down as the grrrreatest president in US historical archivial documented annals.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

WootenDull,

Great comments - you nailed it.

Mid South,

If we’re going to subpoena people who gave President Bush incorrect intelligence regarding WMDs in Iraq, I say, fine - start with the William Jefferson Clinton Administration - specifically Billy Jeff, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, and others who loudly proclaimed the dangers that WMDs in Iraq posed - among other reasons we needed regime change.

As for the Republican candidates, we have a fine bunch of great men with outstanding resume’s running. I personally favor Romney and Guiliani, and am strongly opposed to McCain despite his stance on Iraq. Fred has to demonstrate that he wants to be President and his hesitancy to sign up for the job is irksome.

I agree with Wooten that Gilmore looked great and could be a VP candidate, but I do not agree that Perdue could fill those shoes. We need a statesman, and as much as I approve of Perdue as our Governor, I don’t see him in the White House.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this

The best of the lot would be former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, but there’s no chance. Given the left’s blind, vicious hatred of the president, no Bush can be on the ticket in 2008.

Amazing. Jim has lost it. Retire Jim before they take you away. Geez®

The Iranians are ready to talk. This development will leave the gop war mongers to war monger on OBL in Pakistan.

Did you see #2’s video? He was in a library, looking rested and gloating about his victory.

They are not living in caves.They are living large in Pakistan planning their next attack.

I am sure the Dems will go after them for 9/11 because the gop could care a less.

God save America †

By @@

May 6, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this

Jim:

I’m not terribly disappointed with the selection of candidates offered up by the GOP. The obvious front-runners offer a diversity that I’m willing to accept, as will a lot of the moderates.

I could live happily ever after with several of them. I couldn’t live with “Run” Paul though.

Sorry Getalife, I know “Run” is your favored GOP candidate.

When you look to the other side…the Democratic candidates, you find that their voters are willing to elect a candidate based on superficialities. Name recognition and inexperience shrouded in charisma.

Oh, and then there’s the get out of Iraq thingy.

Their most capable and qualified candidate; the one who brings experience, intelligence, and the ability to negotiate and compromise isn’t even polling in the double digits since last I checked.

That candidate might not scare the bejeebers out of the moderates. Moderates are pretty smart people. That’s why they voted for “moderate” dems in November and were reluctant to install too many of those.

It’s looking good for the Republicans in ‘08 in my opinion, and if Fred Thompson announces, the dems will definitely be dying with Ronnie’s boots on their grave.

Man…..I just got a chill.

See ‘ya Jim.

By Cornshucks

May 6, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

Do you believe in evolution? Dna mutates. ‘nuff said.

Newt Ginrich’s book, “A Contract With the Earth”, includes his assessment of a new type of eco-friendly Republican Party he calls, “Green Conservativism”, (a kinder, genetic approach?).

He asks the reader “what is green conservatism”?

Newt answers the reader, “favoring clean air and water, understanding biodiversity as a positive good, believing that economic growth can be eco-friendly, and minimizing carbon loading in the atmosphere….(etc)”

Positive Good? Is that a redundancy that can only occur when someone is writing propaganda and campaign rhetoric?

The corporate sponsors who wrote this piece for Newt pay a glossy, yet gossamer lip service to liberal concerns about eco-doom, yet in Newt’s book, there is never any mention about how these same corporate sponsors are pouring the petroleum products into our Gulf+Jet Streams slowly poisoning us all.

It’s Celebrity Weightloss! First up, Earth! Last week, Earth weighed in at 40 weight. This week, Earth is only 30 weight!! Earth has lost 10 weights!!!

Most of Ginrich’s book is a Prayer to Science to save us all from global warming: “Green Conservatism aims to take advantage of science by offering incentives that will direct progress toward our shared environment goals”.

Sound real pretty. Newt always did have a real pretty mouth, and he be speaking those fancy words positive good.

But saying nothing except liberal bad, conservative good.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish and Mid-South Philosopher,

If we want to bring people in for the latest Democrat show trial to get to the bottom of bad intelligence we need to bring in anyone that is left from the Church Committee or anyone that still supports the committees conclusions and restrictions.

We can start with Jimmah.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

{{{By I Voted for the War Even Though I’m a Coward May 6, 2007 8:47 AM These guys all represent me fine. Especially Giuliani - s/he looks great in a dress.}}}

I’m not bugging you this morning, am I Polly?

Ain’t life a bitc-h?

Call me a fa-g all day long, retch up the most foul insults your depraved gutter mind can conjure, you babbling retard, while al Gitmo calls us the “haters.”

Define yourself.

Tell us who you are.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Would Rudi Wear the Burka?

May 6, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

When he visits the Middle East?

I know he’d like to.

By Mid-South Philosopher

May 6, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

To Buy Danish and RW(the original

Anyone who has followed my contributions to this Blog understands that I am not a Clinton fan.

What galls me is that Dickie and Donnie appeared on national television and told us that(and I paraphrase) Saddam has stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction and he will use them eminently against us or our allies. Donnie went on to tell ABC News (and I heard the fool the day that he said it) “We know where they are.” What pi**es me off is that I belived him! I supported the war effort based upon Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Powell.

Subsequent evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this was not true!

Over time I have come to feel betrayed. I watch Georgie Bush addressing me and I see the hint of a “smirk” to go with his “swagger!”

The proof of the deceitfulness of Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, in my judgment is the fact that not one, NOT ONE, intelligence officer has lost their job for providing this information to the President.

Buy Danish, RW(the orginal), WHY?!?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

“Could the GOP find an uglier stupider looking cracker to be their VP candidate?”

Careful with that language Pollydik, your man Obama is half cracker.

What planet do RATs dwell from? RAT senator Dodd was on FNS Chris Wallace and was preaching about stiffing corporations with that sick liberal neoMarxist bullsnot known as a carbon tax. Thin the pinhead said he was going to force US auto manufacturers to get average economy up to 50mpg. (Hey pal, you gonna tell the Japs to do that since Toyota gave your UAW company GM the smackdown?)

Hilarious. For 20 minutes Tenet has been on Meet The Depressed and for 20 minutes Russert has been trying to get Tenet to say the Iraq war and intel was Bush’s fault. Tenet won’t go there. He knows the truth. Bush, you should have cleaned the hell out of the house after the Clintoon party.

I can’t wait to see what George Steponanoctupus is going to say and what clowns he’ll be bringing to the table.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

@@,

Ron Paul will never be nominated. Way too smart, way too honest and not a corprate w-hore like all the gop.

You will run Rudy or McLiar and you will lose no matter who you run.

We have have over 1000 subpoenas to go and the run up to the occupation has many coming out with the truth.

By Dennis

May 6, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

Mr. Wooten writes, “Any of the 10 is one I’d take into an election against the Democratic field. It’s as easy to imagine most any of these 10 making decisions for a nation at war as it is difficult to consider any Democratic contender at the trigger.”

It is sad than a man can write this kind of propaganda, get it published in a major newspaper, and get paid for it.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:32 AM | Link to this

Hitllary is unelectable. If she gets the nomination even with Snowflake as the veep, it will be a record turnout to put that witch back in the cave. As WD said, Daffy Duck could be the GOP frontrunner and it won’t matter. And that’s the pain of reality.

By @@

May 6, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

Ooohhh nooooo!

Mid-South Philosopher:

I’ve always appreciated reading your posts here, but the “smirk & swagger” comment?

I respectfully submit that it reduces your fine character to “petty”.

The “simple-minded” leftists here have done that one to death.

Have a nice day though.

I’m out till later. OR…

Knock yourself out PoliFore/CornShucker/Pesos Amigos/?????

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this

“It is sad than a man can write this kind of propaganda, get it published in a major newspaper, and get paid for it.”

That’s funny Dennis, I say the exact same thing about Jay Kookman and Cindy Tucker.

Liberalism - when independent thinking just isn’t good enough

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:43 AM | Link to this

Up to just last year McCain was the hero of the jackass media and “center left” (hahahah!) RATs. He was called a “Maverick Republican” because he opposed Bush on lots of things. Now he’s hated by the diseased liberal cage monkeys and called “McLiar” because of his stance on Iraq. Funny old world, isn’t it?

Flip flop. Flip, flop. Flip. Flop.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 10:43 AM | Link to this

Mid-South,

AS I said, if you want to get to the root of intel problems, with respect to the CIA, go back to the Church Committee. You can’t just pick your favorite starting point when you want to review cause and effect.

As for the WMD issue and comments like we know where they are they probably thought they were in the same places Saddam thought they were. Don’t you find it odd that the Iraqi military leaders handed out chemical weapons suits and then hauled butt out of the battlefield when they suddenly found out they didn’t have the munitions?

I apologize for not having studied up on your positions on this blog. I very seldom read here and didn’t think it was important to search the archives to ascertain how I should phrase a response to what seemed like a comment that could stand on it’s own like your idea to haul Condi into a show trial to force a few heads to roll. By the way, the most responsible head already rolled. Almost literally.

By Dennis

May 6, 2007 10:45 AM | Link to this

By Markus May 6, 2007 10:36 AM “It is sad than a man can write this kind of propaganda, get it published in a major newspaper, and get paid for it.” That’s funny Dennis, I say the exact same thing about Jay Kookman and Cindy Tucker.

Markus, no one intelligent doubts that you would.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this

Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock.

It’s only a matter of time before some dumb@ssed neoStalinist global fearmonger walarmist kook demonRAT will start blaming soccer moms in their SUVs and the fallacy of man-made global warming for the tornado outbreak in Kansas.

Hey jackals, they don’t call that area tornado alley for nothing during the past 100 years.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

“Markus, no one intelligent doubts that you would.”

Brilliant comeback Dennis. Got any other snappy comebacks to impress everyone with? Man.

Liberalism - indoctrinating one unused mind at a time

By getalife

May 6, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

Ignorant is macaca’s last name.

The truth about the run up to the Iraq occupation was using the intell to back up their agenda whether it was true or not.

This is illegal. It is an illegal occupation , pure and simple. They must be held accountable to assure the world we are still a nation of laws.

Holding them accountable for this illegal occupation is the first step in getting our reputation back.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

“Ignorant is macaca’s last name.”

You are one to talk al Gitmo. You got schooled yesterday at 1:57 and it appears you want some more lessons today.

K.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

Mid South,

For someone who doesn’t like Clinton, you are awfully quick to absolve his administration of blame for the poor intelligence and stick it to the bogeyman triumvirate of Cheney/Rumsfeld/Bush.

btw, I’m getting very tired of the oft repeated lie that the Bush Administration claimed that Saddam was an “imminent” threat - Bush clearly said that we needed to eliminate the danger before an attack was imminent.

If we follow the Obama/Hillary route, we wait until we’re attacked, huff and puff at the outrage, and then we get FEMA to take care of the mess.

That^^is why Guiliani is perfectly correct to say that the Dems would go on defense.

I personally believe that what was left of Saddam’s WMDS are in Syria, but anyone who believes they were all destroyed should provide “intelligence” that proves it, because (to the best of my knowledge) no one is disputing that he had them at one time.

Instead what we’re told can be summed up as: We can’t find them, ergo there weren’t any in the first place and Bush lied.

RW,

Great point about the Church committee. We also need to subpoena the heads of state of every American ally on the planet for Waxman’s show trial, because they all believed there were WMDs too.

By jm

May 6, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this

talk is cheap - especially 18 months before an election.

Sonny Perdue? He showed his true conservative colors. $142 million tax cut while going to the feds hat in hand for money for fire fighting and Peachcare. I guess he would rather spend my federal tax dollars.

By Not a Hater

May 6, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

Let’s get one thing perfectly clear - I am not a hater.

When one goes to see the freaks at the circus, one does not hate.

One might want to vomit sometimes, but it is not out of hate. Disgust is not hate.

Face it - you Andi and the rest of your freak friends are effing hilarious.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 11:02 AM | Link to this

getalife,

Don’t look now, but we handed over sovereignty to Iraq a couple of years ago and told them we would leave whenever they asked. It’s pretty hard to make a case that our current presence in Iraq is illegal.

Markus,

I think today’s column from Queen Pinko backs your claim pretty well.

She tells the same tired old lie about McCarthy ruining lives, but of course she doesn’t mention any. She gets in a shot for gun control and becomes GWB’s biggest supporter all in a column about a State rep running for a US House seat.

By Dennis

May 6, 2007 11:05 AM | Link to this

By Markus May 6, 2007 10:53 AM “Markus, no one intelligent doubts that you would.” Brilliant comeback Dennis. Got any other snappy comebacks to impress everyone with? Man. Liberalism - indoctrinating one unused mind at a time.”

Well, Markus, given that Bush’s popularity rating is at 28%, I’d say liberalism has given a new life to a lot of conservatives. But, I suppose there are a few like you who just can’t be reached?

Have a good day, Markus.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Craig

May 6, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

If I recall correctly, in October last year Wooten was confidently predicting that the Republicans would lose maybe one or two seats, but keep both houses of Congress. And all you wacko righties were cheering him on. Y’all keep drinking that Kool Aid.

By Skram30082

May 6, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this

OK, let’s be serious for a sec…

Jimbo said:

“Given the left’s blind, vicious hatred of the president, no Bush can be on the ticket in 2008.”

How about this:

“Given the right’s blind, vicious hatred of the ex-president, Hillary can’t/won’t be elected in 2008.”

If the GOP wants a slam-dunk method to ensure that the next prez is a Repub, cross over to the Democratic primary and vote for Hillary.

Jimbo also said this about Rudy :

“He does, however, have some liabilities here, one of which is that he comes across as very much the fast-talking New Yorker who has to leave a transcript behind so Southerners can be sure what he said.”

How about this regarding Sonny as a veep candidate:

“He does, however, have some liabilities here, one of which is that he comes across as very much the slow-talking, dimwitted neck who bores to tears those northereners that he needs to vote for him.”

Now, regardless of your opinion of Sonny, adding him to the GOP ticket will undo the the advantage that they gain by making sure that the Dem candidate is Hillary.

This isn’t hard to figure out, folks…

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this

Craig,

As I mentioned earlier I don’t read much over here so it’s possible there is some truth to what you wrote at 11:09, but I doubt it.

Most people I know on the right were sure we were going to lose the House and knew the Senate was touch and go, although most thought the GOP would hold it with at least a 50/50 split.

Keep dicking around with the troops and your surrender plan and you’re going down big in 08. Pretend to be strong on defense and knock off the show trials and you’ll hold onto both sides of Congress and stand a decent chance of taking the White House too.

Right now Henry Waxman is the Republican’s best friend. Followed closely by tweedle dee and tweedle dum that you have as House and Senate leaders.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this

macaca,

I answered your ignorant question yesterday.

Every post shows your ignorant hatred of Americans.

K.

RW,

Lets let Waxman ask the questions about the illegal occupation. It is just starting.

Your guy took the oversight name off of the committee name:

“Wiki provides some “fun” facts about Rep. Davis:

As Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, he issued 1052 subpoenas for the Clinton administration. He also removed the “Oversight” title, which Waxman promptly reinstated upon taking over in January.

He was aware of the substandard conditions at Walter Reed in 2004, but didn’t hold hearings because he didn’t want to “embarass” the Army by publicizing the issue.

During the Schiavo contorversy, he issued a subpoena that ordered the appearance of Terry, her husband, Michael, and her doctors.”

He is one of the main reasons there was no oversight and rubber stamp gop.

There is major oversight that needs to be caught up, so Waman should issue at least 2000 subpeonas .

Just to be fair and balanced.

Bwa.

By GT

May 6, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this

One of the great politicians in the Republican Party is never mentioned in these discussions. Governor Bob Riley of Alabama is pulling a backwoods state out of a ditch with auto plants and tourist attractions along with a ton of other out of the box ingenuities. I find this man to be competitive but honest a rare combination in the political world. Even the auto plant Georgia did land, and Sonny proudly points to, is three miles from the Alabama border for a reason. You have the spin misters domiciled in Atlanta, and Wooten seems to dance under their influence, but check our neighbors and you will see what a great governor can do for a state. Maybe he is just too busy doing his job to think of running for a higher office.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this

“Well, Markus, given that Bush’s popularity rating is at 28%, I’d say liberalism has given a new life to a lot of conservatives.”

Like Carter’s 28% did you mean? You jackasses say he’s one of the best presidents ever. Everything is relative.

“But, I suppose there are a few like you who just can’t be reached?”

No, we don’t want to be reached and indoctrinated to the disease of liberalism. You can take your neoStalinist propoganda straight to hell.

By Redneck Psycho-logy

May 6, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this

One must remember that when one is analyzing redneck psycho-logy that one is dealing with primitive cultural norms. For instance, rednecks are 4 to 8 times more violent than decent Americans, 5 to 10 times more likely to have been a rapist or a victim of rape, 5 to 10 times more likely to have experienced incest. Many (actually, most) are victims of STDs and/or drug/alchohol abuse that has impacted their limited ability to reason even further.

The GOP since the 1960s has been the party of the redneck. The debate last week shows how primitive the party (once a bastion of progress and science) has become in an attempt to appeal to the victims of redneck society, the rednecks themselves. As an example, 3 of the candidates believe in the Fairy Tale (not to be confused with Andi’s Fairy Tail) of Intelligent Design. And only one, Ron Paul, did not believe the Fairy Tale War on Tare in Iraq could be won.

Can the degenerate redneck people be lifted out of their discontent, slovenliness, and hatred, or will they remain an ever-growing threat to world peace and American democracy?

By getalife

May 6, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

Too bad the corporate media and the gop will not bash w like they did Carter.

w’s rating would be like Olmert’s. 0%.

Carter is loved like Clinton in the world.

The coward w will not speak in front of real Americans.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

You didn’t answer a damn thing yesterday and you know it al Gitmo.

Anyway…

“Republicans are being belligerent towards Iran.”

That’s the Queenboy of Kook, Keith Olbermann spreading those cheeks as usual. Let’s see here. A leader in Iran calls for the destruction of not only Israel, BUT the United States as well. A leader of Iran calls our president evil. A leader of a nation that suppresses women which would be unheard of in this nation.

Yet according to diseased liberal moonbats, wee are being “belligerent” towards those serpents. It’s always refreshing to see which side the disgusting left takes, as if it’s ever a suprise.

By Dennis

May 6, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

By Markus May 6, 2007 11:26 AM | Quoting Dennis, “But, I suppose there are a few like you who just can’t be reached?”

Markus reply, “No, we don’t want to be reached and indoctrinated to the disease of liberalism.”

No doubt, Markus, you are a very happy person, you know, “ignorance is bliss”, that sort of thing.

Have a good day, Markus. No doubt there are plenty of people on here who will argue with you and entertain you.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Randy

May 6, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this

Do you ever watch O’Reilly Wooten? He puts a direct question to his librul guests. They redirect the question to their usual librul rhetoric, blah blah blah, avoiding to answer. He tries to bring them back to the original question but they want to dance. It’s all about Bush.

You won’t catch a GOP candidate hiding in the bushes like the dems. They actually stand for something.

The dems will stand down in the next presidential election.

Their goosey ways are cooked.

By Cornshucks

May 6, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this

Paris Hilton could have won the Republican Party’s first debate this week. Or was that Giuliani?

You’re gonna crossdress in ‘08

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

By getalife

May 6, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

Answered it twice macaca.

KO scares you wingnuts with the truth.

Plus he is funny.

Next.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

“No doubt, Markus, you are a very happy person, you know, “ignorance is bliss”, that sort of thing.”

Dennis, whatever you liberal jackals are for, no doubt I’m against. And vice versa. I consider being called “ignorant” by the likes of you as success, because as God as my witness I could never be sick in the head like you liberals..

Liberalism - when a mind is a terrible thing

By getalife

May 6, 2007 11:46 AM | Link to this

The Elephant in the Room George W. Bush has the lowest presidential approval rating in a generation, and the leading Dems beat every major ’08 Republican. Coincidence?

Duh.

Losers.

Geez®

By Markus

May 6, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

Yeah al Gitmo, KO is so effin’ popular his ratings are at the stinking sh!thole bottom where most of you pathetic liberal RAT vermin get your votes from.

To refresh your memory yesterday al Gitmo, you said Mike Stark was accosted by Allen personnel yet did not say why. I just thought I’d help you out and show you the pictures of the kook forcing his way past a secured area.

But, if you consider that as an “answer” to me, I’ll let it go. You are a sick liberal mind of irrationality that’s void of reality. And everyone here knows it.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this

Fox News just said returns indicate that Sarkozy has won the French election.

Vive la France!!

My boycott of French wine is now under reconsideration.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 11:50 AM | Link to this

getalife,

When is Hognose going to subpoena the Iraqi Parliament since they’re sanctioning the legal presence of American troops?

By the way, Markus has a great point about Jimmy Carter and his approval rating. Are you libs going to be shrieking about what a great President W was in thirty years?

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 11:53 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

At the risk of sounding like the two food critics at ml’s I’ve got a fine bottle of Pouilly-Fuisse that’s ready to be dusted off in celebration.

By GT

May 6, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

“Can the degenerate redneck people be lifted out of their discontent, slovenliness, and hatred, or will they remain an ever-growing threat to world peace and American democracy?” Great words but totally in the face of what politicians have found and franchised in the Republican Party. Any cultural awakenness in the GOP as in other parts of our modern society would derail the control mechanisms of the few that own the many. At some point we crossed a line of no return, our souls mortgaged and delivered to the world of obesity, dumbed down education, shock jock radio and mass pick up truck transportation. Bush’s landing on an aircraft carrier four years ago dress in flyboy uniform declaring mission accomplished framed the situation of our times beyond all explanation.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

“RECESSION CALLING?” - Urinal page F1

The Urinal Constipation just can’t help themselves. Negative, negative, negative. Even with all the positives out there. It’s just plain pathetic.

By GaLiberal

May 6, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Keep up the fantasy Jim. Just more Bush clones (tax cuts for the rich, stay the course in Iraq, and use pregnancy as a punishment). Americans are fed up with the regressive and unfair policies of conservatives. All they’ve done is cause unnecessary surffering and stirred up hatred. No wonder the KKK and Rush Limbaugh represent the true face of conservative Republicans. They foster hatred of others while preaching they and their kind are the master race. Only they have the right answers to bring about the greater glory of the country. Others have said the same thing and the consequences are terrible. Mass murder, loss of basic human rights, destruction of property, and in the end everyone suffers. Yes, the field of Republican Presidential candidates is quite capable. That’s what I find most frightening.

By Cornshucks

May 6, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

At that same Republican Candidate Debate, the name of Ronald Reagan was mentioned so many times, he’s been given secret service protection……

You’re gonna love ‘08

if you love justice, that is

Vote Democrat, and vote for Victory in America.

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this

“No wonder the KKK and Rush Limbaugh represent the true face of conservative Republicans.”

This moonbat has the gall to mention the KKK when a current RAT senator is the only ex-Klansman in Congress. Let’s see… the last time a klansman tried to infiltrate the Republican party, he got his @ss handed to him and thrown out the door. Remember Duke you little pathetic liberal sheilas?

“Mass murder,”

Like abortion?

“loss of basic human rights,”

Like kissing up to Iran?

“destruction of property,”

WTF are you talking about now, clown. Bush blowing up Katrina… err I mean the WTC? Loons.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

“He has the willpower to change France.” - Voter Anne Combemale

And it couldn’t have come at a sooner time when your diseased candyassed liberals over there were about to hand France over to islamic terrorists.

Yeaaahhh! I can buy French wine and brie again!

“The highest turnout at that point in more than 30 years.”

Power to the people. Let’s get Hitllary nominated and watch the highest turnout in US history AGAINST a candidate.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this

Some Senator Dodd comments from this morning on FNS with Chris Wallace:

“We need to raise CAFE to 50mpg.”

So Senator, just what specific plans do you have for that to happen? In your answer Sir, please include how the automakers are to keep their profitability up while selling bean wagons that nobody wants.

chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp

“We need to hit corporations with a carbon tax. That will wake them up.”

So Senator, have you thought of the economic repercussions of that and how the working class may be the ones to get hurt the most due to job losses and cost recovery?

chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp

Liberals. Run that mouth first then worry about actually doing it and the repercussions later. Kinda like gas prices right now, eh Nanny Pelosivich? You haven’t mouthed off about them since last November. What’s up Nanny besides gas prices?

Posers.

By Dennis

May 6, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

By Markus May 6, 2007 11:41 AM | Dennis said, “No doubt, Markus, you are a very happy person, you know, “ignorance is bliss”, that sort of thing.”

Markus said, “Dennis, whatever you liberal jackals are for, no doubt I’m against. And vice versa. I consider being called “ignorant” by the likes of you as success, because as God as my witness I could never be sick in the head like you liberals.”

Markus, as I said, you are a very happy person, you know, “ignorance is bliss”, that sort of thing.”

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Cornshucks

May 6, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

There were nearly as many Republican Candidates in that debate thursday as there were horses at Saturday’s Kentucky Derby.

A surprising total of 15 Derby horses signaled that they do not believe in evolution. (in spite of the queen’s horse face’d husband)

By Ever Notice?

May 6, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

That that Italian poof Markus sounds an awful lot like the English poof TFTT just without the thesaurus?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this

“Markus, as I said, you are a very happy person, you know, “ignorance is bliss”, that sort of thing.””

You still here Dennis? Like I said, being psuedo-insulted by you liberal rhesus monkeys makes me know I’m doing something RIGHT.

Speaking of TFTT, where’s he been lately?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:41 PM | Link to this

“As his party prepared Champagne and canapés for Sunday night outside his Paris headquarters, Sarkozy swiftly rebuffed Royal’s fears of rioting. “She’s not in a good mood this morning,” he told Europe 1 ratio. “It must be the opinion polls.”“

LMAO. Looks like the sick left over there act like animals when defeated too. I wonder if they’ll match the stupidity of a “stolen” election like we see here only when the RAT pack loses.

Sick, sick, sick.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Stop with the flip flopping on France.

You are worse than your candidates with postions.

First you hate them now, you love them.

Geez®

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this

Sheryl Crawfish Crow:

However, what terrifies me is not what we are ignoring about the state of our planet but the fact that we seem to have lost touch with our connection to the earth.

Look you idiot Jim Jones Kool-aid global walarmist scaremonger, if you didn’t learn it in school, learn it now: the earth is not in a stationary state. It is always changing. Always. Global warming happened 10,000 and melted a lot of ice. 30 years ago you global warming cultists said it was global cooling. The hell is wrong with you people?

Oh look! Ice caps on Mars are melting too.

Cheesy poofs.

By Cornshucks

May 6, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Okay, here’s how the joke should go: Three of the Republican Candidates admitted they dont believe in evolution during Thursday’s debate. There were nearly as many candidates debating as there were horses in Saturday’s Kentucky Derby. 15 of those horses signaled that they dont believe in evolution either. In fact, one horse was so adamant about it that they had to give him secret service protection.

or something like that. Killer bit yours for the hacking.

You’re gonna neigh ‘08

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

POD (POD is an acronym for Pee On Dull)

The string of P’s is the pee. (on dull)

Dull’s string of Z’s is hacked from the Zodiac Killer’s way of taunting police in letters he sent them. They never caught the Zodiac Killer. Hmmmmm.

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

Bwa

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

If you RATs can flip on McCain, we can flip on France. It’s the leadership, stoolpigeons. Looks like the people came out of their liberal fog.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

Markus: Dennis has the “open” light turned on but no one is there.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By Not a Hater May 6, 2007 11:01 AM Let’s get one thing perfectly clear - I am not a hater.}}}

Look at this sh-it^^, Polly just up and had a guilt trip.

You pinko®s are funny that way, you get guilt like a woman will get cramps.

Is it possible that liberals are missing a chromosome or two?

Anyway, I got another question and, as always, don’t worry about offending me, answer it honestly:

Isn’t the very definition of Cowardice to lurk on an anonymous blog calling people you don’t agree with “f-a-gs?”

No one called you a hater, Polly, we said that you didn’t have any balls.

And we weren’t lying.

Coward.

You libs are gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

War on islamofascism.

Check.

Killer economy.

Check.

Jobs abound.

Check.

Record DOW.

Check.

Keeping it “real” with Iran.

Check.

Low taxes.

Check.

Liberal demoncat’s checklist:

Evolution.

Check.

Priorities, I suppose.

By Democratic Deception

May 6, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

Barack Obama is the darling candidate of the MSLM.

Barack Obama is too white for African Americans. So is Condi Rice, Justice Thomas. So was Colin Powell.

Barack Obama gets secret service protection early in the campaign.

MSLM claims Barack Obama has received racist threats offering no evidence — no facts.

Barack Obama does not respond to MSLM’s claims. Emphasizes massive crowds of supporters.

Democratic leaders in congress supports MSLM’s unfounded claims.

Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson support early protection measures.

Barack Obama is running as the democrat’s Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. both assassinated.

Has Barack Obama’s life been threatened?

Is this a ploy on the part of the democrats?

This stinks to high heaven.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

The History Channel’s R. Lee “Gunnie” Ermey goes back to Vietnam and even visits the Hanoi Hilton. You think they’ll show him that AA gun that Hanoi Jane sat on pointed at the sky while John McCain was being REALLY tortured on the same soil at the same time? We’ll see.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this

“Has Barack Obama’s life been threatened? Is this a ploy on the part of the democrats? This stinks to high heaven.”

Oooooo. I didn’t think about that. I wouldn’t put it past some Shrillary bot to do that. However, I believe he may just be her veep on a ticket, so who knows for sure. The media just can’t hold back their orgasms even thinking about it.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

This is a great story about the “the father of the science of modern climatology” who disputes the foolish conclusions of the mad Global Warming alarmists.

His credentials:

Reid A. Bryson holds the 30th PhD in Meteorology granted in the history of American education. Emeritus Professor and founding chairman of the University of Wisconsin Department of Meteorology—now the Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences—in the 1970s he became the first director of what’s now the UW’s Gaylord Nelson Institute of Environmental Studies. He’s a member of the United Nations Global 500 Roll of Honor—created, the U.N. says, to recognize “outstanding achievements in the protection and improvement of the environment.” He has authored five books and more than 230 other publications and was identified by the British Institute of Geographers as the most frequently cited climatologist in the world.

I would love to see this gentleman debate Al Gore and Sheryl Crowe, and even our own rushncap.

By Democratic Deception

May 6, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this

Stay with me on this one Markus.

Hillary is a divisive candidate among the democrats. Her stance on national security complicates things for their win in 2008.

Barack Obama’s support among African Americans is divided. He’s anti-war. He’s way left.

Will African Americans change their minds if an African American candidate has had his life threatened by racists?

Does the democratic party want to win at all costs?

I want facts to back up the MSLM’s claims. Until they can, I see this as campaign tactics typical of the democrats.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

“House Minority Leader John Boehner’s (R-Cincinnati) comments were an acknowledgment of the concern expressed by some lawmakers in private that their support could further damage the party, which lost control of Congress in the November elections. “

No, stay the course Boner.

It is getting better, only 4 more died for the illegal occupation

Geez®

By Markus

May 6, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

Pals shoot up a UN-run school near Gaza.

These are some of the monsters that the sick left wants us to bend over for and allow Israel to be destroyed over.

We are all Palestinians.

Speak for yourself, San Freaksicko liberal freak.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 1:51 PM | Link to this

Hamas, the darling of the sick left, is indoctrinating youngsters into hatred of those “beneath them” who are not of Islamic faith. Racism just like Hitler, if you will (yeah I know “racism” has nothing to do with religion, but the sick left thinks so just like being against illegal immigration is “racist” even though that has nothing to do with race either).

Anyway, we are all just “afraid” of these people and don’t need to be. They are not a threat to the region, the hemisphere, or the world. They’ll leave us alone if we just leave them alone.

Mmm-huh. Ok. And the denialist moonbat left wants to completely run this nation and only worry about sodomizing those who are successful in this nation. Now THAT is scary.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this

VERY interesting thesis, DD. It will be something to monitor. What gets me is that Republicans are constantly put under the microscope, but yet nobody seems to ever be able to trace back and touch the democrats for some reason, even when blatant crimes such as stealing and destroying classified intel docs. Is that because the rabid media and pit bull lawyers only goes after Republicans (since 2000 anyway) or because democrats just know how to mask themselves better with their friends in law and the media? Cops code, if you will… “they vs. us.”

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this

Deployed Troops Abroad Lose Child Custody At Home

Push them to the limit and they will snap.

Support the troops my a-ss.

God save your poor souls †

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:04 PM | Link to this

Gitmo supports a party that supports baby murdering halfway out of the womb, supports a party that wants all elements of Christianity out of the public, and supports a party that has no problem with blasphemy of Christian icons in art at taxpayer expense. Then gitmo has the nads to post about God saving souls. Pathetic.

“We have lost the war.”

Yeah, that’s how you sick liberals support the troops.

Zombies.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

It’s been many years since I’ve been to the Champs-Elysees, but methinks another trip might just be in order and support the people who woke up and flushed liberal appeasement socialism down the toilet. I miss the rush of riding at 180mph on the TGV too.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:14 PM | Link to this

macaca supports a party who are pro life but loves blowing up babies for no reason, the death penalty, loves to be lied to and loves cover up.

He supports the criminals who have destroyed our country.

Religion belongs in church. Period.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

A few months ago when “scientist” rushncap first joined the Global warming debate he said he thought it was happening and that man probably had some small involvement. Now he’s a full blown Gorebot which doesn’t do anything for or against the Global warming debate, but it’s one of the first solid pieces of evidence I’ve seen for the theory of evolution. Apparently listening endlessly to moonbat talking points can make you evolve into a sheep.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this

RW,

You should let that go.

His intellect is way above yours.

I am embarrased for you.

Geez®

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this

Dunno what country you live in gitmo, but MY country is doing just fine. Read the economic indicators lately? It’s always easy to make up bullsh!t and repeat it over and over as the truth. Of course, if your idea of “world” opinion is the most important thing, then you just think that as the most important thing and let the real world adults deal with the actual important things like islamofascist terrorism which wants to destroy the entire Western civilization.

Lies and a coverup. Nobody can touch the damage of stealing and destroying classified intel documents relating to the 9/11 Commission investigation. NOBODY. Trash.

“Religion belongs in church. Period.”

Then practice what you preach gitmo and keep it off this blog.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

No chance macaca.

I rule this blog but you can stay and voice your opinion.

This is America.

By POD

May 6, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this

POD!!!

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

bwa

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this

Party over country is macaca’s motto.

Pathetic failed American.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

“…but it’s (mindless global warming botism) one of the first solid pieces of evidence I’ve seen for the theory of evolution. Apparently listening endlessly to moonbat talking points can make you evolve into a sheep.”

LMAO RW. I nominate this for the best blog comment of the week.

By Dusty

May 6, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this

RW@2:15,

Oh you made me laugh at that sheep story. Good one.

I also celebrate the good sense of the French in their election. Tomorrow I shall buy a bottle of Manichevitz and live it up!! (Alas, it is not fruitcake season. What fine French substitute should I buy?)

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

RW,

rushncap is another one I’d pay to see debate the Father of Climatology.

rushncap says the opinions of people like us are to be disregarded because we are not scientists, yet gives the Goreacle a pass on that same requirement.

rushncap also claims that “consensus” is science. I wonder if he would feel that way if the consensus swung in our direction.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:39 PM | Link to this

Wingnuts talking about sheep is hilarious .

The irony is hilarious.

Geez®

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this

GFY gitmo (good for you). Rule away dominatrix. Yes, this is America. I can have my say too, unlike your BS yesterday about insinuating we all are dangerous and need to be sent to gitmo without giving specific examples.

You really are one twisted individual. An entertaining propogandist, but twisted.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this

World opinion over America’s success is gitmo’s motto.

Sick, sick, sick.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 2:46 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

I recommend Babas au Rhum but I do not recommend substituting the rum with Manichevitz.

Or maybe you could come up with your own recipe and call it “Gateau au Sarko”!

VIVE LA REVOLUTION!

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:46 PM | Link to this

Its your mindset.

No more hate in 08®

How in the world does your mind block out all the lies, cover ups, the lost illegal occupation and the no oversight by the rubber stamp gop?

Do tell.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 2:52 PM | Link to this

“Its your mindset. No more hate in 08®”

And there we have it. Any ideas opposing gitmo is “hate.” He’d have made a great nazi supremist. Then again, most sick liberals think they are gods of intelligence and everyone else who doesn’t share their twisted view of the world is beneath them.

Sick, sick, sick.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 2:53 PM | Link to this

{{{By Democratic Deception May 6, 2007 1:31 PM Barack Obama’s support among African Americans is divided. He’s anti-war. He’s way left.}}}

Puh-leeze.

None of these Coward liberals has a position on the war, other than what the latest poll tells them to do.

Even Snowflake, after seeing the moonbat sisters Reid and Pelosi get Bush Smacked had to clarify that he wasn’t a Coward like them:

Still, Obama offered assurance that he would not shrink from using military force to protect the United States. He also called for an expansion of U.S. ground forces, pledging an enlargement of the Army by 60,000 and the Marines by 27,000.

Huh, a hundred thousand more troops hanging out in the barracks stateside, while Al Qaeda runs wild through the Middle East, yes, great idea.

So naive, such Cowards.

Our “competition.”

Bwahahahahaha.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 2:54 PM | Link to this

chirp, chirp, chirp.

Answer the question without blaming the Dems.

Do tell, try to be honest.

By Dusty

May 6, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I knew you would come up with something good. But Babas au Rhum sounds like something with forty thieves. Maybe “Rhum & CocaCola” (my husband’s favorite song when “rhum” is rippling) with sweet gateau? But Sarko???

Mais OUI!! Vive la Revoluation!! Vive la Guillotine for those that don’t like it.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this

His intellect is way above yours-By getalfe.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I’ll take that challenge on any formalized IQ test any day of the week.

Buy Danish, Markus, and Dusty.

Even the French moonbattress has more class than the Goreacle. She has formally conceded. Time to break open the French wine and Dusty that DOES NOT mean Manichevitz from a French deli.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this

I’ll answer your question as soon as someone is actually CONVICTED of outing a CIA covert operative among other things, gitmo. Since you are too cowardly to say anything about Berger, I won’t mention your RAT shenanigans and coverups. I’ll say that Republicans like Duke Cunningham got what they deserved. Further, psuedo-Conservatives that got the beatdown 11/06 got what they deserved too. They needed a Reagan Conservative wakeup call, and they got it.

Simple as that.

By @@

May 6, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this

I’m still reeling from the “smirk & swagger” from Mid-South Philosopher. Add that to his repetitive reference to our President as “Georgie” Bush and I’m convinced that Dusty has been right all along. The Mid-South I’ve always appreciated is a “ringer”.

I’m tired of being fooled by liberals who claim to be moderates.

I voted for Bill Clinton. He turned out to be a disappointment, but I don’t dislike the guy enough to call him “Billy”. I’m going to give myself that freedom right now…

President Bush’s Major Mistake: Keeping A Bad Tenet

George W. did this with his Tenet — Clinton’s Director of the CIA, George Tenet. When Bush cleaned house in 2001, he left Tenet in place and relied on him for Intelligence information even though Clinton had always missed on stopping Osama bin Laden based on CIA information. But then Clinton (and Carter before him) had destroyed the CIA’s ability to get vital information by denying it human resources overseas and relying, instead, on analysts at Langley — the “Valerie Plames” — who worked from their desks trying to make judgments on what might happen.

Remember that this entire Bush administration had been in the White House only for a few months in 2001. Bush was also delayed by the Gore flap (like a headless chicken) in getting an early start in building an administration. No matter whether it is an incoming Democrat or Republican President, it takes a long time for a new government to get up to speed due to our existing bureaucratic form of government. This has happened with every major political change in the past.

Yessiree, I’m going to call him red-faced Billy Boy Clinton with the bulging eyes and popping veins.

Why would I mention that?

Because he was completely without dignity and defense of his incompetence.

I don’t believe I’ve EVER seen George behave in such a manner.

Frisk the freakin’ liberals first.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this

“SOCIALISTS IN HISTORIC DEFEAT!”

Bottoms up! Stick that up your collectivist neoMarxist a-sses, liberal socialist RATs.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

Nothing changed in France, the same party won. Chirac was a con idiots.

The flip flop is hilariuos.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:11 PM | Link to this

“I’m tired of being fooled by liberals who claim to be moderates.”

@@, it doesn’t take much to read between the lines on some of these people here. Remember, liberals are so smart that they really aren’t even liberals. They’re above any ideological classification, even though they themselves can’t exist without grouping people into classes.

“I voted for Bill Clinton.”

Sigh. Some things are best left unspoken.

By Dusty

May 6, 2007 3:11 PM | Link to this

Awww RW,

I am going to check the French deli markdown section at Food Depot tomorrow. If you insist that Manichevitz is not French, then I shall purchase Mogen Davis as a chaser for my Baba au Rhum. That ought to take care of the French items. Or maybe I will go all out and buy FRENCH fries at Burger King. I believe in living it up!!

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this

So much for the moonbat’s love of France:

{{{SARKOZY’S VICTORY MESSAGE TO AMERICA: ‘YOU CAN COUNT ON FRANCE AS A FRIEND’..}}}

And, believe me, this ain’t the kind of “friend” the Cowards were hoping for.

The big loser here is Islam and their quest to make France into a dhimmi state.

Viva La France!

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this

Chirac was a candy@ssed terrorist appeaser. Remember that? The new homeboy won’t play around. Liberals were praying for the socialist victory. It was the definitive moment for France: grow a backbone or pussout and turn the nation over to radical islamists.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this

@@,

That takes courage to admit voting for Bill Clinton with the wingnuts.

You know, if you vote for a woman, he will be back in the White House.

Ambassador to the world, like he is now. We could him to apologize to the world for the w disaster.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

Chirac was a con from the right.

Nothing has changed.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this

“Across the city at Socialist headquarters there was gloom and sorrow after the party crashed to its third consecutive presidential election defeat.”

Defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. This is a huge turning point in what we thought was the lost nation of France.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:24 PM | Link to this

Incredible.

Wingnuts flip flop on France and call it a victory.

I guess I should let you have this pathetic moment because the gop here will not see victory for decades.

“Freedom fries” and the French boycott is history.

Yahoo.

Geez®

By @@

May 6, 2007 3:25 PM | Link to this

AND a-n-o-t-h-e-r thing….

Zawahiri also had this to say in his video:

Al-Zawahri encouraged minorities around the world to join the holy war, or jihad.

Al-Qaida is not merely for the benefit of Muslims,'' he said.That’s why I want blacks in America, people of color, American Indians, Hispanics, and all the weak and oppressed in North and South America, in Africa and Asia, and all over the world.”

Who gives a flying F what you want Zawahiri?

What in the hell was that all about? Remember what I’ve said about divide and conquer? Hell, remember what he ^^^ said about political divisions within the U.S. It is his, Al Qaeda’s victory.

This was an outrage! I’M outraged to think that this butchering S.O.B. would even think that America’s minorities would buy into his psychological warfare games.

For him to think that American citizens would engage in the killing of women, children, innocents AND our troops is beyond my comprehension.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:25 PM | Link to this

Just what we need. Groper in chief back in the White House more worried about chasing nasty skank fatassed intern tail than terrorism.

Yes Shrillary, your nomination is just what Republicans need. When 50% say they will NOT vote for you, please, PLEASE get the nomination.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 3:25 PM | Link to this

Well let me give you one fact first. In the first 30 feet of the atmosphere, on the average, outward radiation from the Earth, which is what CO2 is supposed to affect, how much [of the reflected energy] is absorbed by water vapor? In the first 30 feet, 80 percent, okay? Q: Eighty percent of the heat radiated back from the surface is absorbed in the first 30 feet by water vapor… A: And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide? Eight hundredths of one percent. One one-thousandth as important as water vapor. You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.

Eight hundredths of one percent.

That’s what liberals want to strangle the American economy over.

Eight hundredths of one percent.

This is the mass hysteria.

Eight hundredths of one percent.

WTF?

Viva La France!

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this

@@,

Did you see where he was at?

It looked like a library.

By POD...........bwa

May 6, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this

POD!

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

bwa

By jm

May 6, 2007 3:32 PM | Link to this

Markus you might enjoy this: War Cost Money. Why Can’t Politicians Say So

Ready to give up your tax cuts or your government services to pay for the Iraq boondoggle?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:32 PM | Link to this

WD, please don’t use big numbers and statistical facts around here, especially with the fallacy of man-made global warming liberal cultists. It causes their heads to explode.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this

How many anti-terror programs did Chirac support and deploy?

‘Nuff said.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this

Yes, stay on global warming.

It is the only argument you have left that you have not lost yet.

Judging by how many times you have been proven dead wrong, the odds are, there is man made global warming.

I yield the blog.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 3:40 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife May 6, 2007 3:24 PM Incredible. Wingnuts flip flop on France and call it a victory.}}}

al Gitmo: Yes, it is a tremendous defeat for the American Coward and the advancement of radical Islam, your great sorrow is understandable.

Denial is the first step in mourning, you will soon be overcome with much grief followed by melancholy.

Umm, don’t pay no mind if you see other Americans celebrating, just remember they are not laughing with you, no, they are laughing at you.

Or something like that.

Viva La France!

USAUSAUSAUSAUSA

By @@

May 6, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this

Dammit Getalife, you made me laugh in the middle of my outrage.

You know, if you vote for a woman, he will be back in the White House.

I was just reading an article about the elections in France.

They all fool around. Chirac…Mitterand…Billy Boy. It’s “progressive” I guess. Like a progressive dinner.

This house for drinks and hors deurves, another for the entree, and yet another for “desserts”. And then there are those men who like to enjoy a “good cigar” after, some during.

Well, anyway…Sarkozy had enjoyed some “take out” but saw the error in his ways. He vows that he and his wife will not take up residence in the “palace”, they will reside (sleep together) in their own home.

Royale’s husband, on the other hand said “If she wins, she can sleep where she wants to. I’ll be sleeping at home.”

Thanks for the laugh. I’m not very comfortable with outrage. It’s kinda like sleeping in a strange bed.

By Dusty

May 6, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this

WootenDull,

So Sarkozy really said “You can count on France as a friend.” Oh, I love that.

I think that I, too, shall have to go to France and hug the Eiffel Tower.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this

JM, everyone from about the sixth grade on knows that wars cost money (among other things). Why do you sheeple have to be reminded of that by the Compost?

For the record, tax cuts and the Iraq war are mixing so poorly that the Fed just canned the Treasury Note.

Negative, negative, negative.

Sick.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

WootenDull.

Last week Alexander Cockburn, the ultra-Leftist dude who writes for The Nation described it as “a fart in a hurricane”.

By @@

May 6, 2007 3:45 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

Olan Mills can put you in a library.

Hell, even you can look like a scholar. (ISH)

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

jm,

High taxes cost the Federal Treasury money. Why can’t you libs get that basic tenet of Capitalism 101 through your heads?

By getalife

May 6, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this

@@,

Real Americans do not listen to him, they want him killed or captured for 9/11.

I was amazed of where he video taped. That was no cave.

Enjoy ya’all’s flip flop on France. I do not pay much attention to other countries with everything happening in ours and Iraq.

I yield back the blog.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:52 PM | Link to this

Hmmm. Just when I slam the Compost, along comes this.

“Democrats’ Momentum Is Stalling.”

You don’t say. They b!tched up a storm since Katrina (no pun intended) about gas prices, raised holy hell about Iraq troop withdrawal timestamps, and other odds and ends that they have come out of their liberal coma of. Yeah man, talk smack, get elected, have a few flashes in the pan like minimum wage, and then just park their fat@sses on the couch.

Stoolpigeons.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 3:54 PM | Link to this

“I do not pay much attention to other countries with everything happening in ours and Iraq.”

al Gitmo sayeth this while just crowing that his hero Billy Clintoon is loved around the world.

Sure wish these liberal RATs could make up their effin’ minds about things.

Freaks.

By @@

May 6, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

Markus:

Maybe Getalife was talking about a “carnal knowledge” kind of love.

A love of “fine cigars”.

Do they love Billy Boy in Cuba Getalife?

By Jeff Gannon/Guckert

May 6, 2007 4:03 PM | Link to this

All I know is that Andi and Markus both smoked my ceegar last nite…

Stupid poofs.

By jm

May 6, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish - why can’t you conservatives balance a budget?

By Dusty

May 6, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this

Oh, this is a WINNING day..

Braves just won 6-4. Way to go, Braves!!!

By Markus

May 6, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this

“Why can’t you libs get that basic tenet of Capitalism 101 through your heads?”

Because BD, collectivist socialism doesn’t wire their brains to accept that reality. They think “low taxes” and then suddenly the “poor” are getting the shaft while the rich steal from the “poor” (however the hell one can steal from someone who has nothing is beyond me). The sickos want this beloved model of Euroeconomics to rule here. No thanks.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this

Probably, everybody loves him except the wingnuts.

Its funny that if they reach our soil, they are legal.

Hatians, Mexicans, etc.. or not.

Sanctions on Cuba but free trade for Communist China.

I want some Monte Cristo #2’s at Wal Mart.

Smoke em with the new Crown.

Yum.

By POD...........bwa

May 6, 2007 4:08 PM | Link to this

POD!!

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

bwa

By Markus

May 6, 2007 4:19 PM | Link to this

An addendum to that Compost link:

This time last year, all the rage on the broadcast RAT media Sunday shows like Meet The Depressed and Steponanoctopus besides Iraq was about gas prices and what the RATs were going to do about them to help the “working man.” (Personally, I think accountants and lawyers and COOs work, but I suppose to a sick liberal only those who actually sweat and make $15/hr really “work.”).

I’ve been waiting for weeks now for one Sunday show to bring up the topic. Not surprisingly, not a word mentioned anywhere. I wonder why that is?

By @@

May 6, 2007 4:22 PM | Link to this

Yessssss!!!

Put another win in Bush’s column.

The Islamic Revolution eating the Islamic Republic

Whatever the reasons, political observers have no doubt that the detention of Mr. Moussavian, a personality much respected outside the country, would backfire on both the leader and the president as well as on the Iranian regime.

Patience my liberal pets.

Patience.

A conservative’s advantage.

By jm

May 6, 2007 4:24 PM | Link to this

Markus & Buy Danish - one of the basic tenets of capitalism is that your revenues are supposed to exceed your expenses (or at least equal them). Otherwise, you go out of business.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this

“…one of the basic tenets of capitalism is that your revenues are supposed to exceed your expenses (or at least equal them). Otherwise, you go out of business.”

Yeah jm, that’s why your beloved mandatory Socialist Security program is such a success too, right?

One thing jm that you and other collectivist liberal socialists don’t understand is that corporations don’t have guaranteed long term revenue that can be increased or decreased at the flick of a pen. Government does. It’s called taxes.

By jm

May 6, 2007 4:38 PM | Link to this

who said I was wedded to social security? Actually medicare is in far worse shape but that discussion is for another day.

All I want to know is why none of you conservatives seem willing to give up government services or pay more in taxes to support the war in Iraq. You seem perfectly content to put it on the credit card and pass the costs on to future generations.

Talk is cheap, put your money where your mouth is.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

Hehehe. The liberal vermin Daily Hos are all pantyp!ssed about the results in France.

“It’s a disappointing development for our French friends and for the whole world. As many mistakes as Segolene made, I believe that she would have made a remarkable president.”

Awwweee. Yeah I know queefers. Doesn’t it just suck to have a leader in France who’s actually pro-American and willing to stand up to islamofascism not matter what the rest of the non-UK Euroweenies think.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

{{{“The flag of the Left lies on the ground,” said Laurent Fabius, one of the most senior French Socialists.)))

Yes it does.

It will soon have company, the white flag that our Coward liberals like to fly.

Hehehehe.

Viva La France!

USAUSAUSAUSAUSA

By Markus

May 6, 2007 4:53 PM | Link to this

Good thing I save my posts. TWO links only can be posted here. Anyway…

Part I:

“You seem perfectly content to put it on the credit card and pass the costs on to future generations. Talk is cheap, put your money where your mouth is.”

Ok numbnuts, my patience is wearing thin. What part of increased tax revenues and a lowering deficit do you NOT understand?

Slimes 2005

Compost 2005

By Markus

May 6, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

Part II:

Yahoo 2007

You idiots said Reagan’s deficit was going to cost generations but magically it disappeared in the 1990s. I’m sick of the lies and scaremonger propoganda from you liberals.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this

Schumer agrees, Sarko is good for the U.S., but…???

Prior to the election results being made public, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., said a Sarkozy victory would be favorable to the United States.// “Clearly, his views are more in line with ours,” Lugar told CNN’s “Late Edition With Wolf Blitzer.”//Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., concurred: “I do. I do,” he told CNN. “I mean, it would be nice to have someone who is head of France who doesn’t almost have a knee-jerk reaction against the United States.

Like your own constituency, Chuckie?

By @@

May 6, 2007 5:02 PM | Link to this

OMG, the posters at DailyKos are already calling for the liberals in France to oust Sarkozy.

They haven’t even given him a chance.

He hasn’t even assumed office.

Where do America’s liberal tyrrants get off telling citizens in other countries what to do? I believe it was a democratic election, wasn’t it?

I’m aghast at people like those.

le pot à la bouilloire là.

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

read ‘em and weep Markus: Revenue and Spending Comparisons

There is that brief surplus period during the Clinton Administration but the rest, pure red ink.

Fyi, Reagan’s deficit did not disappear, it got added to the National Debt

Which as you can see is closing in on $9 trillion.

Too easy.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

2007:

Islamic “radicals” kill five in Thailand.

2046:

Reporters in Michigan have been found mummified while apparently waiting on what used to be CAIR’s headquarters for a response on global terrorism and radical Islam.

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:10 PM | Link to this

Markus here is another one for you Debt and the Bush Budgets from that noted liberal rag The Washington Times

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this

JM, you are comparing the national debt to deficit spending. Funny how you libs like to brag about Clintoon “balancing the budget” (as if the Republicans Congress had nothing to do with it) and then suddenly you start squawking about the overall national debt.

Can ONE of you idiots please take a side on topics and STICK WITH IT?

Thanks.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 5:13 PM | Link to this

Why fight the War on Terror when there are more important things to worry about?

People complain about social conservatives needing to stay out of their bedrooms. But globwarming greens are fooling around in every damned room in my house. First of all it was the 1.6 gallon Al Gore toilet (last item), introduced by Federal compulsion, which accomplished in two or three flushes what the ol’ three-gallon Bemis could do in one. And even if Sheryl Crow says she was joking about the infamous “one square” advice, the family of rich green wackos in Manhattan wasn’t joking about not using any TP for a year. And now, it’s light bulbs.

How can these losers possibly believe they have the diplomatic skills to sway nations if they can’t even PERSUADE the American people to VOLUNTARILY switch their light bulbs that we are told saves us oodles on our electric bills?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:15 PM | Link to this

“OMG, the posters at DailyKos are already calling for the liberals in France to oust Sarkozy.”

Sounds like our “Impeach Bush” jackassed liberals here. Anarchists. They are all dangerous and need to be sent to gitmo.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this

“We have a balanced budget today that is mostly a result of 1) an exceptionally strong economy that is creating gobs of new tax revenues and 2) a shrinking military budget. Social spending is still soaring and now costs more than $1 trillion.”

• Newt Gingrich 1998

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 5:21 PM | Link to this

Marcus,

This is a great website that details every Islamic terrorist attack around the world. There have been 8,225 since 9/11 and new attacks occur every day all over the world.

Scroll down.

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Markus - I said during the Clinton Adminstration but if you prefer, I will say during the Gingrich speakership.

Also, I did not compare the national debt to deficit spending. You stated that Reagan’s deficit “disappeared” during the 90’s. It did not. All of the deficits from the Reagan years, Bush 41 years, Clinton years and Bush 43 got added to the National Debt.

By @@

May 6, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

Alright, I’m contemplating here…

The State Department issued a report last week warning about the emergence of a terrorist “conveyor belt” that seeks to radicalize alienated minorities and drive them toward violence.

O.K., so they’re having to recruit from outside their area of operation. They’re trying to recruit minorities here in America? AMERICA of all places?

The news is not entirely bad. In several countries with well-functioning governments and powerful security forces, al Qaeda has run into trouble. Two weeks ago, for example, authorities in Saudi Arabia announced that more than 170 suspected terrorists have been arrested in recent months as part of a plot to target oil fields and other targets. “The franchise in Saudi Arabia has been defeated,” says Bruce Riedel, a veteran CIA analyst now with the Brookings Institution. “In Egypt, it never got off the ground. In Indonesia, there was a big threat in 2002 and 2003, but it seems to have lost momentum.”

Even in these places, the success could be temporary. “It’s not like they’ve defeated the thought,” warns the senior U.S. intelligence official. “It’s just that the capabilities of these cells to execute has been really damaged.”

And what is it the Democrats are doing in the interest of our national security/intelligence gathering capabilities?

I read yesterday that they were re-directing intelligence funding to global warming research.

Let’s see now. A well-functioning (I take that to mean UNIFIED) government and powerful security measures can really damage Al Qaeda’s abilities.

Maybe we should re-evaluate what happened in November. Take a closer look at those Democrats in charge.

Yes, I think it would behoove this country to reassess IN NOVEMBER 2007.

A fork in the road.

Stick it in the left. They’re well past done.

Charred is more like it.

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:29 PM | Link to this

Markus regarding your post at 5:18 about increasing social costs. It goes back to my original statement: “What services are you willing to give up to support the Iraq War”.

By RW-(the original)

May 6, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this

What Conservative around here has ever said they wouldn’t be willing to cut government? I think we need to enlist jm over here like I did the moonbat RE over at ml’s and start slashing away at the Federal government. Where would you like to start, jm?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

“You stated that Reagan’s deficit “disappeared” during the 90’s. It did not.”

JM, I know how you liberals like to split hairs of technicalities. The bottom line is that deficit spending can be REVERSED. Now to me, that means it can disappear. Now what that has to do with the overall national debt is a entire different story. Now you can take that fact and throw it out the window for all I care.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:34 PM | Link to this

““What services are you willing to give up to support the Iraq War”.”

How about blindly wasting money at FEMA for starters JM?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:36 PM | Link to this

Great link BD, thanks! No, we shouldn’t be “afraid” of them as gitmo sayeth on this blog.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 5:41 PM | Link to this

So, how many troops are France going to send to Iraq?

Zero, zip, nada.

Its the Iraqi welfare that needs to be cut not American.

Freaking traitors.

Geez®

By Jeff Gannon/Guckert

May 6, 2007 5:42 PM | Link to this

Markus gives great service. And he never gives up.

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:44 PM | Link to this

Markus - FEMA is a start.

RW-original - the Bush drug plan is the first place I would look at. War on Drugs is another. DoD is another (I would prefer less money spent on toys, more on soldiers). Simplifying tax code is another.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:44 PM | Link to this

“Freaking traitors.”

Yeah man, and liberal runner RATs like Dirty Harry Reid throw this fecal matter into the faces of our troops:

“The war in Iraq is lost.”

Sick, sick, sick.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 5:45 PM | Link to this

RW,

Not only is it unlikely that jm will name any social programs he is willing to cut, I love the way he limits this demand for personal sacrifice to the Iraq War, ignoring every other place our military is deployed around the world.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

You’re correct. France probably will not send troops to Iraq. That’s why they need to take the lead in Darfur.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

JM, I agree on the war on drugs BS too. Wow.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:48 PM | Link to this

Awe, and PollyFore shows up just in time to get a snippet of scraps. Back it your Urinal-lined cage, parrot.

By Buy Danish

May 6, 2007 5:49 PM | Link to this

So far jm hasn’t named a thing that is a personal sacrifice on his part.

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:49 PM | Link to this

Oh and Markus as far as technicalities go, the balance on my credit card would not disappear if I I actually paid more than I spent for a month or two. The bill ran up by all those other months would still be there (plus interest).

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:52 PM | Link to this

“British companies involved in the Emissions Trading Scheme enjoy a $1.5 billion profits windfall while energy prices to the consumer increased 72 percent.”

LMAO. Betcha you don’t here the scaremonger global walarmist liberal Jim Jones Kool-aid cultists complain about that.

No, of course not. Otherwise CNN would have picked up on it.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

Define these Cowards:

{{{Another recent poll taken by American Research Group surveyed 600 likely Democratic primary voters and 600 likely Republican primary voters. Asked if the United States can win the war, 70 percent of Democrats answered no, and 75 percent of Republicans answered yes. Seventy percent of Democrats said they favored setting a deadline for withdrawal; 77 percent of Republicans said they did not.}}}

The libs are overwhelmingly the surrender monkey party.

It looks like we need to do a France on them.

Viva La France!

USAUSAUSAUSAUSA

By jm

May 6, 2007 5:54 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish - I notice you did not volunteer to give up your tax cuts or services to support the Iraq war. I do not support it, so why should I be willing to sacrifice for it?

Oh and Buy Danish, how do you know if any of the items I listed are a personal sacrifice or not?

By Markus

May 6, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

I agree totally JM. Now maybe we can put the liberal lie of Clinton “balancing the budget” to rest.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

BD,

I can’t argue with that.

Lets let China play world police.

jm,

I agree, the war on drugs is lost and a waste of money.

Legalize weed and tax it like tobacco can help the deficit.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 5:59 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife May 6, 2007 5:41 PM So, how many troops are France going to send to Iraq?}}}

Why would France need to send troops to Iraq?

Bush Master has that deal well in hand.

Take care of the suburbs of Paris first.

We’ll find some country for you to bomb later, don’t worry.

Viva La France!

USAUSAUSAUSAUSA

By Markus

May 6, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

“Lets let China play world police.”

Gitmo never fails to amaze me in the derangement of liberalism. Your boy gave all those secrets away gitmo. Our teachers are too liberal now to tell our children WRONG!! when teaching math because they don’t want to hurt their “self esteem.”

Well we’ll just self-esteem ourselves to domination in 25 years due to the disease of liberalism that inflicts this nation.

By getalife

May 6, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

Well,

I was wrong, 8 more died and many more Iraqis.

There ya go, more blood for you bloodsuker.

Geez®

By Markus

May 6, 2007 6:12 PM | Link to this

By jm May 6, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish - why can’t you conservatives balance a budget?

It took two hours to determine that liberals can’t do it either. Thanks for playing JM.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 6:15 PM | Link to this

“Buy Danish - I notice you did not volunteer to give up your tax cuts or services to support the Iraq war. I do not support it, so why should I be willing to sacrifice for it?”

I don’t support a lot of liberal socialist policies JM, not the least of which is mandatory SS, so why should I have to support them out of my paycheck of sacrifice?

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

May 6, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

God, what a gawdawful bunch of kkkonservative kkkrap was posted here today. You Woo-ten Klanners will burn in Hell.

Lord, Deliver Us from the scourge of the filthy southern redneck, and their minions of morons and mindless, We Your Pope pray on this day. Amen.

By Markus

May 6, 2007 6:34 PM | Link to this

Oh look. Flameboy liberal rednecks al Qaeda pipes in after the blog closes. We’ll burn in hell. Nice. That’s a Class AAAAA liberal demoncat for you, folks. Such lovely people. This jackass didn’t even debate anything today.

Poof.

By WootenDull

May 6, 2007 6:35 PM | Link to this

{{{By Pimp racist - Amerikkka’s Al Wanker May 6, 2007 6:20 PM God, what a gawdawful bunch of kkkonservative kkkrap was posted here today. You Woo-ten Klanners will burn in Hell.}}}

Whenever the Cowards whine, America wins.

Viva La France!

USAUSAUSAUSAUSA

By joeldm

May 7, 2007 8:43 AM | Link to this

You’re kidding me, right? The 08 election a “cakewalk” for the GOP? You must be the same guy who said the Iraqis would greet us as liberators and oil revenues would pay for the war. Have Conservatives done ANYTHING right?

The missing WMD, the looting of 350 tons of high explosive after conquering Iraq (read “no real plan for Iraq except to kick a$$), the Iraqi reconstruction money scandal(s), lies during the selling of the war, the Katrina aftermath, Gonzales (‘nuff said), the Medicare Drug plan sellout, rewriting of scientific reports by political hacks, inexplicably reducing cigarette settlement amount AFTER WE WON THE CASE, Jack Abramoff, Gay Conservative Prostitutes in the press corps, Halliburton’s no-bid windfall, Valerie Plame, Abu Ghraib, whew! And that’s just the highlights. Bush has led most incompetent and corrupt administration in history and had (until recently) a Congress to match … think “all of the above” plus Terri Schiavo.

Blogging while high should be a crime … .

JoeL

By Curious Observer

May 7, 2007 8:54 AM | Link to this

I watched the debate of the Republican presidential candidates with the same fascination I have for car wrecks. I must say I haven’t seen such a rogues’ gallery of self-parodying demagogues since the McCarthy hearings.

Abortion? Get rid of it! If we get ‘em pregnant, they’re gonna stay pregnant. And we’re gonna be sure we cut the flow of federal funds to support the little illegitimate products of sinful living.

Embryonic stem-cell research? No way! That’s just creating life to destroy life. So what if the embryos are going to be tossed in the trash anyway if they’re not used at the fertility clinic? It could be creating life to destroy life, and that’s good enough for me to oppose it.

St. Reagan’s my man! So what if he was senile, unable to distinguish genuine recollections from fantasy and incapable of remembering missile swaps or aid to Contras? He sure put down them Rooshians and spent our way to victory over them.

Even McCain saw fit to demogogue like a little fire-breathing Elmer Gantry.

The only major participant with even a shred of dignity appeared to be Giuliani, and he ruined it with ambivalent messages about Roe v. Wade, partial birth abortion, etc.

Yes, the Republicans have adopted the redneck stance, and rednecks will be about their only supporters in ‘08. I hope the Republican party enjoys its fringe status for a long time after next year. It will be altogether fitting for Sonny to be on the ticket. As a VP candidate, he can create visions of political and social life as it was in the 18th Century, before all this new-fangled stuff involving democracy and such.

By jm

May 7, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

Actually, Marcus, you just declared victory and went home. The fact is, for a few years at least, a liberal not only balanced the budget but had a surplus, causing the national debt clock to start going down. You might want to give congress the credit but fact is, it is the president’s name on the budget and that president’s name was Clinton. Feel free to return to Bushworld now.

By Guy Pinestra

May 7, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this

Jim,

I was saddened to see you tout the establishment line for Rudy McRomback. There is not a ‘front-running’ candidate on that list that would get MY vote.

Ron Paul is head and shoulders above all those corporate-financed hacks that you spew so glowingly about. Take a look at the polls run after the debate if you don’t believe me.

Ron Paul is a strict Constitutionalist, and I for one believe that if we don’t get back to the plan there will be nothing left for our children.

You want tax cuts? Ron Paul would abolish the IRS.

You want low or no inflation? Ron Paul would abolish the Federal Reserve.

You want right to life? Ron Paul is a physician with such a deep respect for life that he opposes the death penalty on PRINCIPLE.

You want local control of schools? Ron Paul would abolish the Dept. of Education, citing the fact that it is unConstitutional for the Federal government to be involved in it. He’s for STATES RIGHTS.

The only reason more people don’t know how GOOD Ron Paul would be for America is the corporate-controlled media (that’s YOU)wouldn’t be able to BUY him like they have the rest of the Republican Party.

Vote for Ron Paul!!!

By Carolyn

May 7, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this

Jim, you do bring out the beast in people with you funny columns.

By Carolyn

May 7, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Sorry, I ment to say with “your” funny articles.

By liberalextremist

May 7, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

Mr. Wooten this is the funniest tripe that I have read in a very long time. The GOP has no chance of winning the White House in ‘08. Keep on dreamin’.

By candide

May 7, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this

The GOP presidential lineup is made up of hasbeens, redneck preachers, bigots, and other sorts of illiterates. God save us from the Republicans.