Thinking Right

By Mid-South Philosopher

May 4, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this

Good morning, Jim,

Right off the bat, we agree this morning on the need for the Georgia General Assembly (God help us) to define the appropriate standards for aggressive vehicle intervention by peace officers in traffic chases. I wonder how the high court would have ruled had, as a result of the officer’s aggressive action, the vehicle of the 19 year old driver crashed into an on coming automobile killing a family of six!?! It didn’t happen in this case of course, but it has happened in other similar situations.

Again, NO ONE supports our peace officers more than me. That being said, I am becoming more and more concerned about he quality of officers now being unleashed on society. Maybe, we need to require that by 2014 there be a “quality peace officer” on every beat. We could come up with some Performance Standards for every police department and sheriff’s office in America to unpack and have long in-service and staff-development gatherings for officers (on their own time and after they have worked their shifts, of course.)

On the matter of the coming special session of the Georgia General Assembly, I resent it like Hades and so should every other supporter of the democratic-republican process. Based upon what we believe to be their political positions, we elect these representatives and senators to represent the best interests of the people and to conduct the peoples’ business to the best of their intellectual ability. It is absurd that a Republican governor and a Republican controlled legislature should have NOT worked out their differences in four months of regular session and now should have to add to the unnecessary spending of the peoples’ tax dollars. Of course, at the tune of $43,000 per day (what a special session costs), these buffoons can burn up the surplus budget money very quickly and then will not have to have to worry about what to do with it. A plague on all of them and on “Silly Sonny”, too!

Finally, as to the Washington escort service Madame, the liberally dominated mainstream media would delight in finding names like “Karl”, “Donald”, or even “Dick” on the list. They would settle for a “Rudi”, “Mitt”, or a certain “John.” The conservative bloggers and radio talk show voices would delight to find the democratic “John” or a “Barack” on the list. While the name “Bill” would be no surprise, to find a “Hillary” would be.

Likely, the names will be those of conservative or liberal financers and supporters. There may be corporatists or tree huggers. Vice, as I can only recall from memory, is not unique to a political party.

If, indeed, some high profile governmental personalities should be on the list, it might be tantalizing. However, if they do not know any more about fornicating than they do about running the country, it will likely be a boring story!

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

May 4, 2007 8:21 AM | Link to this

Jim,

How dare you prase the efforts of liberal media.

A watchdog? Pluheeeeze.

They’re so biased they can’t see straight. Just more promulgating of the leftist homo agenda.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 8:30 AM | Link to this

If they widen the 575/I75 then that would give speeders more room to maneuver around cop cars trying to ram them. Who needs six flags when you got bumper cars right there? The supreme court will change it’s ruling after realizing how cops will act now that they think the law is on their side….OK, that came out wrong.

The recent road rage knife attack which killed a family man after he tapped on his brakes to disuade a tailgater brings to light an important point. It’s totally illegal to brake against a tailgater. Most tailgating is an innocent blunder by daydreaming motorists, and any brake lights suddenly in their face could cause them to overreact. Simply get out of their way and let them tailgate some other poor sod. Dont hit the brakes. It’s illegal, and you will be liable if it causes an accident.

By Jim Wooten

May 4, 2007 8:42 AM | Link to this

Morning, Philosopher and all. You’re on your game today. Your “boring story” line is a gem.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 9:01 AM | Link to this

Speaking of publicizing lists of clients and embarrassing people, I hope that the poster company who sold the millions of Barbie Bandit Mug Shots dont publish the list of customers who actually visited the Barbie Bandits in jail…….never mind.

Certainly the most influential people list should include the Barbie Bandits. I’d ram their cars any day…d’oh! Life could be a dream. There weren’t babes like that when I was in high school. Just the fact that there are Barbie Bandits make me howl at the moon. Cant help it. Babe bandits are rare, they just are, most women baditos look like aunt bea on steroids and if you’re not gay, then a man has to settle for fantasy barbie bandit dolls.

Introducing the Bandit Barbie. Lets get millions of six year olds thinking abut a life of crime, think of how many Republican Senators we’d be grooming, maybe even a future president!!

BUT: You just know barbie bandit dolls would get criticized for setting up cookie cutter stereotypes of role models for young girls, but imagine the paradise we’d all be living in if every woman looked like a bandit barbie doll.

I know, you get the bit……..

By Ms Writer

May 4, 2007 9:03 AM | Link to this

So Jim let me get this right…The fleeing driver in the Cadillac should have hit an innocent person and rendered them a quadriplegic or better yet dead? Ok I get it…

Though I like many on both sides are sick of Bush’s cowboy tactics, it is rather disrespectful that they did not list him as an influential person—-Osama Bin Laden even made the cut..go figure.

By Dennis

May 4, 2007 9:12 AM | Link to this

Mr. Wooten writes; “Setting a deadline for withdrawal is setting a date for failure.” So spoke President Bush in vetoing a $124 billion war spending bill that he said “substitutes the opinions of politicians for the judgment of our military commanders.”

Setting a deadline for FAILURE was March 20, 2003, when George W. Bush substituted his own opinion over the intelligence evidence in front of his eyes and attacked Iraq without provacation.

Give the Iraqi people some credit. Iraq is an occupied country and the sooner we get out the sooner the Iraqis will settle their internal differences. Including driving Al Quaeda out of Iraq.

Honestly, Mr. Wooten, how do you live with yourself from some of the stuff you write?

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Chris

May 4, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this

Time dissing President Bush as not having on their “100 Most influential people” list is another sign that Time Warner wants both Bush and Vice President Cheney impeached. We need to take a cold, hard look at the conservatives who work for them and question their patriotism. This includes Glenn Beck, Mona Charen, Bill Bennett, J.C. Watts, and Charles Krauthammer.

It is also time to question the intentions of others who work for Time Warner and question their patroitism. These include John Smoltz, John Scheurholz, Bonnie Schneider (CNN), Kyra Phillips (CNN), Rick Sanchez (CNN), Larry King (CNN), Wolfgang The Communist Scum Blitzer (CNN), Bobby Cox, Chipper Jones, Jack Cafferty, Renay San Miguel (CNN Headline News)Nina Easton (Fortune), Lisa Karlin (People), Tom Verducci (Sports Illustrated), John Alex Floyd, Jr. (Southern Living), and Teresa Baldwin (Entertainment Weekly).

Time Warner must be held accountable for their actions in destroying our country and now!

By Chris

May 4, 2007 9:15 AM | Link to this

Time dissing President Bush as not having on their “100 Most influential people” list is another sign that Time Warner wants both Bush and Vice President Cheney impeached. We need to take a cold, hard look at the conservatives who work for them and question their patriotism. This includes Glenn Beck, Mona Charen, Bill Bennett, J.C. Watts, and Charles Krauthammer.

It is also time to question the intentions of others who work for Time Warner and question their patroitism. These include John Smoltz, John Scheurholz, Bonnie Schneider (CNN), Kyra Phillips (CNN), Rick Sanchez (CNN), Larry King (CNN), Wolfgang The Communist Scum Blitzer (CNN), Bobby Cox, Chipper Jones, Jack Cafferty, Renay San Miguel (CNN Headline News)Nina Easton (Fortune), Lisa Karlin (People), Tom Verducci (Sports Illustrated), Charles Barkely (TNT), John Alex Floyd, Jr. (Southern Living), and Teresa Baldwin (Entertainment Weekly).

Time Warner must be held accountable for their actions in destroying our country and now!

By getalife

May 4, 2007 9:16 AM | Link to this

Watched that pathetic debate last night.

Ronald Reagen won.

Clue to the gop, he is dead idiots.

Geez.

Only one had a brain and his name is Ron Paul.

The only one that did not want another preemptive war with Iran.

What a bunch idiotic, cowards, scared of Hillary and another country that will never attack us. They did not learn a damn thing from the Iraq occupation.

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

May 4, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

Hi Again Jim,

One more thing about the bribery scandal at APS and the liberal media spreading thier unfair and unbalanced tripe about town:

Where did those bribes come from? Was Mr. Scott just corrupt in a vaccum? All by himself…a bad bureaucrat?

Me thinks not. He accepted money from private companies looking to do business with the government. That’s how business is done.

So who’s to blame?

Bill Clinton? Hillary? Mayor Franklin? The Democrats?

Surely Republicans could handle things better. Surely they’re not succeptible to this kind of pandering. Surely they wouldn’t use government as a foil to achieve personal gain at the expense of hard working citizens.

Surely not.

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 9:23 AM | Link to this

Running the fleeing homies off the road is too gentle. The more appropriate response would be a few rounds if they can get a clear and safe shot.I’m not sure why Jim is unconcerned about several thousand pounds of vehicle being piloted by a antisocial criminal. Cars are just as dangerous as guns. That quadriplegic 19 year old felon can put that in his pipe and smoke it on the nursing home porch.

If Bush doesn’t believe in “substituting the judgement of politicians for our military commanders” then he would have listened to the military commanders who told him Iraq wasn’t going to be a cakewalk. Instead he listened to his sycophant political hacks. Um, weren’t there several retired Generals who said “Thanks, but no thanks” to un-retiring and trying to clean up his mess? Who cares about their opinions? Just stay the course.

Cornshucks, good reminder to just move over (when you can) for tailgaters. Those who block them deliberately are just passive-aggressive wannabe cops.

By Billy

May 4, 2007 9:28 AM | Link to this

Clark Howard thinks that transit is a viable option for Atlanta, why don’t you guys?

By Ms Writer

May 4, 2007 9:29 AM | Link to this

Lol—Aquagirl I agree with the first statement—-lol—you are NOT playing this morning!

By getalife

May 4, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this

“Also on Palfrey’s list of customers who could be potential witnesses are a Bush administration economist, the head of a conservative think tank, a prominent CEO, several lobbyists and a handful of military officials.”

Our source has told us that the “head of a conservative think tank” is in fact Grover Norquist.

Hahahahahaha.

Figures, family values and all that crap.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this

It’s illegal to tailgate, of course, but it’s also more illegal to slam on your brakes against a tailgater.

Notice nobody ever tailgates a cop car? Notice everyone finds room to move over when a cop car tailgates you?

Pretend every car on the road is a cop car, and we’ll all drive a smooth as a baby’s butt.

The rammed cadillac, spinning out of control, could have easily killed innocent people. It was the wrong call because they had the guy’s name and address. I really miss the Barbie bandits.

By AJCa watchdog?

May 4, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this

If the AJC is indeed a watchdog, why was there no follow up when APS officials falsified federal documents that said South Atlanta had no incidents of violent crime when the Atlanta Police Dept had been called out to the school over 50 times?

If Paul Donsky is a watchdog, why didn’t he follow up on his story that 5 APS schools had, in a single year, a 50 percentage points plus increase in CRCT scores, scores that most believe could not have been achieved without cheating?

If the AJC is a watchdog, it sure is a selective one.

By jm

May 4, 2007 9:41 AM | Link to this

I find it ironic that the same legislature that is looking into giving $142 million back to the tax payers is going hat in hand to Washington for money to help with Peachcare and fighting fires in south Georgia. I guess Mr. Wooten would rather use federal taxes for local problems.

Regarding Governor Corzine, not wearing a seatbelt: if I am not mistaken (it may have changed), aren’t pickup drivers in Georgia exempt from the mandatory seatbelt law? If that is still the case, no one from Georgia has any right to criticise any from another state about seatbelt habits.

Finally, the war on drugs. Like the war on poverty and the war on terror. An open ended program whose sole purpose is to drain the treasury. I guess you could also include the “War on Sex” (see D.C. madam).

By Imus

May 4, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

No Ms. writer@ 9am you nappy headed ho, the fleeing punk teen driver should have been ejected in a rollover and smashed like a bug. I love it when thugs get what they deserve.

In other news, last year Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid were shouting from the pulpits about how the working people are getting stiffed at the gas pumps. They promised they’d come to the rescue. So far, they sit up there in Washington doing nothing. It appears that talking the talk is easier than walking the walk. Naturally since they can’t accomplish what they promised, it’s W’s fault; the buck stops with W as they say. Of course if something could be done about it like say fix all our refineries in disarray, they’d take all the credit. How convenient. If they fail at something or realize something is much harder to accomplish than they thought [reality really bites sometimes], point the finger at W. Who put these losers in office again? Oh yeah, Dummycrats.

By jm

May 4, 2007 9:50 AM | Link to this

Oh yeah, your tax dollars will now be paying to support the 19 year old quadrapilegic for the rest of his life. Something to consider.

By JP

May 4, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this

From the depths of the Simple Minded: We Win, They Lose. No matter how complex the challenges in the Middle East are, no matter how unlikely we are to truly re-invent the political and socio-economic climate of a region that is 10-20 times as old as our country, our country’s moronic right-wing pundits—including our local “celeb” from RedState, Erick—think it’s as simple as “we win, they lose.”

It’s not.

By ron

May 4, 2007 9:52 AM | Link to this

By The Truth Hurts

May 4, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this

So Woot thinks Corzine doesn’t have the “judgement” to be Governor because he didn’t buckle up?

Well, wonder what he thinks of W’s judgement when he chose to tell our enemy to “bring ‘em on.” Does he also think this is a lack of judgement? After all, that statement was probably a rallying cry that cost some of our troops their lives. You have really lowered the bar if a man is unfit to be governor just for a mere lapse of using a seatbelt.

I’d say if it were a republican governor, that statement would have never been made.

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

jm, all the more reason for an appropriately placed round. I’m happy to spend my tax dollars to bury trash.

And think…if police actually took fleeing in cars seriously, there would be a lot less of this “runnin’ from the po-lice” crap. It’s become a game to just take off when the cops try to pull you over. I would exchange the policy of a well-placed round with a mandatory sentence of 5 years for eluding arrest using a vehicle. It’s no different than pulling out a weapon and firing over your shoulder while running. It’s use of potentially deadly force, and it should be treated as such.

Of course, we could remove the problem of many car chases along with the corrupt narc officers—-quit this silly war on drugs.

By Kaye

May 4, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

Why dont we all go to the polls and remove every single one of the government officials and start over. Lets send a message that they are put in office to represent us and if they will not represent us, protect our boarders, and back our military people who are fighting at this moment, then they are out. Lets stand together and push the issue, AMERICA FIRST.

By DebbieDoRight

May 4, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

News organizations that publish the names of men visiting prostitutes, but don’t publish the names of other adults arrested for minor offenses, do it to embarrass. A Washington woman accused of operating an escort service is dropping names “in her effort to avoid a prison term.”

What? Jealous that “Scooter” couldn’t drop a dime to stay outta prison?

By Captain Freedom

May 4, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

Jim, you offer so many low-hanging pieces of fruit to choose from. Let’s just pick one.

The DC Madam story is tailor made for the current crop of media jackals. Nothing sells like sex (well, maybe violence, but that’s another story).

I agree with Wooten that it is unfair to publicize this type of “criminal” while letting other scofflaws go unrevealed. But I would argue that there is a legitimate public interest served when the moralizers and Elmer Gantrys of the world are revealed in their less-than-admirable actions. Examples abound…Swaggart, Haggard, Foley. I’d even include the likes of Gingrich and Livingston as they poked their stubby fingers to the sky decrying Clinton’s pecadilloes, all the while maintaining their own action on the side.

Current case in point…Randall Tobias, head of the administrations AIDS prevention/abstinence promotion effort resigned when his name came up on the list. Of course, like Haggard, he offers the equivalent of “I didn’t inhale” as a defense, but come on and really…$275 a pop for just a massage?!?! Does anyone really believe him?

My guess is that many more names will come out, and many will be of people who loudly and prominently decry the immorality of our liberalized society. This reporting is not only justifiable, it is necessary to demonstrate how these pecksniff moralizers are really just pulling a con on people who want to believe them.

And I will be more than happy to see a few Democratic members on the list, especially those who presume to lecture us on our morality (like Holy Joe Lieberman, or the scolds at the DLC).

The sooner the public realizes that any politician who wishes to save our mortal souls is running a con, the better. I doesn’t matter which party they’re from.

By DebbieDoRight

May 4, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

Rosie O’Donnell and actor Leonardo DiCaprio are included by Time magazine in its 100 most influential people in the world. But not President Bush. A once-proud and vital magazine is now frivolous — and silly, too.

Pres. Bush was included in another top 100 list: “The Top 100 Most Stupid, Blind, Morally Bankrupt People In The World”. You didn’t make it this year; better luck next year.

“In America, anybody can be president. That’s one of the risks you take.” - Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)

By DebbieDoRight

May 4, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

We need to take a cold, hard look at the conservatives who work for them and question their patriotism …… Time Warner must be held accountable for their actions in destroying our country and now!

Dude five words, Just Say No To Drugs

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

Sunni Side Up! Saddam was a Sunni. We need another Saddam. The problem is, it hard to replace a dictator who was good at it. Saddam was great as an evil dictator. He just was.

Bush is asking Americans to believe that the centuries-old strife can be negotiated away with diplomacy and oil money sharing. Like that hasn’t been tried before. It doesn’t work against theo-socio-tyranny. Nothing works against radical Islam. Never has, never will.

We are trapped there, because we truly cant leave. Bush broke Iraq, and it is the democrat’s fault that Iraq cant be fixed… ever, because the democrats keep hoping against hope that we can still pull out.

The democrats want to end the war, but that’s just children dreaming of a better playground. Everyone knows we’re stuck, but because that’s a reality too horrible to accept, we pretend that maybe Bush will win in the end, or maybe we can just pull out.

Think of Iraq as a Barbie bandit: nobody would pull out.

But lets face it now. We are there forever. It will cost us trillions. The Iraqi Baby Boomers need a strong defense, reliable institutions, a fair justice system, an uncorrupted police force, a free market, and plumbing.

US social security funds will all go to that hole in the sand in Iraq. Iraqis are dependent on government, (US government), not Americans.

It may be too late to stop the lobbyists from taking over our country’s foreign policy decisions. I dont think we’ve decided anything independently for years and years. I wonder who is pulling all the strings…

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq? anyone? to fix what cant be fixed? to service the demons unleashed when W opened pandora’s box?

pandora’s box = Iraq

barbie bandits should have their own reality show…on the playboy channel..where is howard stern when you need him???!!

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

Good morning all. “Police shouldn’t be ramming speeders” and Corzine have something in common, don’t they? To open with my standard cranky libertarian argument, if it does not merit the death penalty it ought not be a law. May the quadraplegic teen deserved to die instead, but I doubt it; Gov. Corzine, on the other hand,….

“How many protesters … could find Sudan on a map? All, surely.” You mean “both” – nobody really cares. That is my “sad” commentary for the day. Everything else will be upbeat or smart-alecky.

“Tax breaks” just don’t bother me as much as “spending.” As a purist I would rather see tax law with no exemptions, no deductions – and something more like the sales tax. Tax those who live big, not those creating the future growth (capital base.)

Jim, we cannot all get along because our leftist friends WANT to surrender – the idea of staying and killing all of the terrorists is unfathomable to our leftist friends, especially if it requires courage, endurance, and commitment. OK, I lied – that is cranky too. Maybe I’m in a bad mood – I just thought I was happy.

16 narc officers in a city the size of Atlanta is 15 too many. Don’t waste tax dollars on misbehavior. I’m getting crankier.

Agree on the Fort/Cagle and Scott stories – that is why I am a proud subscriber to such a “leftist rag.” Good work, and it deserves a compliment.

I don’t know what I think about the Washington “ho” story (that is appropriate use of the term, is it not?) Friend called me from Memphis yesterday, affirmed that the disclosure sounded like something I would do. He is probably right, but I think somehow that still bothers me.

If President Bush needs some means to “prove” his influence (although I cannot imagine why anyone would care what Time magazine says about anything), all he would have to do is bar Time magazine from press briefings. How long would it take to get a complaint from them? Or would they even complain that someone without influence barred them?

By Ms Writer

May 4, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this

Imus you idiot — I was using a hypothetical question to indicate that I DISAGREED with Jim in regards to the police situation…

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this

Philosopher has a great idea on the police – call it “No Cop Left Behind.” Apologies to jm and Ron – I write before I read, and you guys wrote better than

By Redneck Convert

May 4, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

Well, the cops wouldn’t need to ram speeding cars if they just let us GA rednecks take care of it with our pistols in our truck and the GA 400 toll booths as ammo stations. Just look what happened the other day. The guy had to stab the other guy because it wasn’t legal for him to carry a pistol in his panel truck to defend hisself. What is the world coming to when commie libruls keep us from carrying guns in our trucks and the diner and shopping centers and other places? We have became a bunch of wimps!

Anyway, looks like that Madam in DC got a bunch of people by the soft parts and might squeeze hard if they try to bring her to Justice. I bet they’s a whole bunch of bureaucrats today looking over their shoulder and whispering and calling their lawyer. Good. It keeps them from messing with us while they are trying to pertect theirselfs. Joe Bill says she will name the VP hisself, but I told him its all nonsense because he’s got all the heart problems and such and ain’t felt the need for a woman for years.

Anyway, I was just checking in before Markus gets off his truck driving job and starts clogging up this here blog with his cussing and snarling during the weekend. Don’t forget to go to church and make your doughnation to good conservative causes there. Its the GA redneck way and we need to keep the libruls in their place. Have a good weekend and don’t let yourself get named by that Madam. It would be a shame if Sister Dusty and jbmlaw and Van and all the other good conservatives got their morale authotrity distroyed and showed up on TV like this Haggard guy or even the Revrend Jim Bob Buice. I could just see Sister Dusty looking into the camera and sniveling and saying “I have sinned, my Lord!”

By JP

May 4, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

I love the Rosie Odonnell bashing—Fox actually asked last night if Rosie was influencing the rock band Rage Against The Machine! How ignorant do you have to be to think they’re sitting around watching the View to get opinions from her?

By Captain Freedom

May 4, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

The Captain wishes to apologize for the tone of his 10:25 post. What he meant to say was that publicizing the names of good Right Thinkers (who were tricked by this nefarious Madam into innocently seeking out physical therapy) is beneath contempt and clearly displays the liberal bias of the MSM and their hatred of America and White Christian Males.

All the good work done by the Godly Mr Tobias…thrown down the tubes by a careless and vindictive press that would not know abstinence if it bit them on the nose. How can we expect our young people to embrace the denial of their sexual urges if the man in charge of encouraging that denial is in fact made to appear as though he himself is denying his failure to deny?

Far better that we focus our attention on Barney Frank, who fifteen years ago did something or other with someone that he should not have done. And let’s not forget the disgusting scandal that forever made the word Lewinsky a synonym for f******. That was less than a decade ago!!! And JFK dipped his LBJohnson into any mammal with two legs and an orifice!! Where is the outrage???

But onto other matters…I am surprised, Mr Wooten, at your naked disdain for our duly sworn Peace Officers. They are the last vestige of defense to keep us safe from the growing underclass of Superpredators and Rappers. I’m with Aquagirl. Let’s give our Peace Keepers all the tools they need to cleanse our Mean Streets of the filth that keeps Ma and Pa America cowering behind closed doors. The only people who should be concerned about unlimited police power are the criminals.

I mean the REAL criminals, not the ones that pay $275 an hour to watch women use the toilet and sniff their undergarments. Especially when you can get that for 50 bucks or less.

Um, I mean, I’ve heard that there are people who are into that. Not the Captain, no siree. Don’t look at me that way!! Like Ivory Snow, the Captain in 99.44 percent pure.

By Bugger

May 4, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

I agree there should be no $150,000 jobs advocate, unless, of course I get that job.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

Dear JP @ 11:19, actually I have listened to some of the banal lyrics of Rage, and wondered what may have screwed up their thinking so – makes the Rosie thing plausible.

By DawgBite

May 4, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

No one has dissed GW like the Republican candidates did during their debate last night. They ran from any reference to him like their heads were on fire and their azzes were catching. But boy how they tried to raise Reagan from the dead. That debate should show you pseudo conservative neo-con lemmings what this administration has done to the Republican party and what these candidates feel that they have to be to remain relevent.

By Captain Freedom

May 4, 2007 11:40 AM | Link to this

JP, you liberal tool

It is a well known fact that Rage Against the Machine formed spontaneously after the band members watched A League of Their Own, which was in fact their first choice of what to name the band. But it was not awkward enough to speak outloud, so they changed it.

Since then Rosie O’Lesbo has written most of their lyrics (uncredited, of course) and overdubbed most of the guitar and drum parts on the studio albums.

The rest is history. You can look it up.

Later, I’ll be back to tell you all about how Ellen Degeneres inspired the Indigo Girls to become musicians…a full five years before she even became famous!!!

By getalife

May 4, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

My goodness, w took us from a superpower Clinton left him to begging for help from small ME countries.

Just gaze at this shame w and the gop have done to our country.

Geez.

Amazing.

By jm

May 4, 2007 11:46 AM | Link to this

I wonder if President Bush will include the war in Iraq and Afghanistan in his next budget proposal to congress. That way, he would not have to go the supplemental route like he has seven times so far. Also, it might mean he might actually have to also include a means of paying for this little boondoggle.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq?

Crusade Accomplice?

By Captain Freedom

May 4, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

The Captain is shcked to discover that the AJC language filter does not allow one to use Latin. An earlier post included the word Filet She Owe, but it was obliterated by a string of asterisks.

I can see filtering French, but really, Latin??? I realize it is the secret tongue of the Papist conspiracy, but it is also the foundatin of the American language. Surely it should be allowed to appear in this learned forum.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 12:00 PM | Link to this

Captain Freedom, are you saying that the Barbie Bandits are lesbians. Please tell it’s so. Life suddenly got real good real fast here on the Wooten blog…..

By jim d

May 4, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

“as watchdogs, newspapers are irreplaceable.”

funny scat today jim.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

The thing that sticks in democratic craws about Iraq is that the whole episode was unnecessary and there’s no upside, it’s all downside.

What if we win the war today? Can we leave. hell no. We have to rebuild their entire country. We have to guard the rebuild. we have to hang around for years to make sure the factions dont split up again.

What if we lose the war tomorrow? Can we leave? hell no. We’d have to fight a defensive action protecting all the refugees and what not and WHAT MESS!!!

It’s a quagmire mess for the ages.

This is the second children’s crusade caused by an adult with the mind of a child.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

jm@11:46

I do “love” to read these Democratic patriots who call our war in Iraq, “little boondoggle”.

Next jm will tell us how he supports the troops who are fighting and dying in this “little boondoggle” and how he is all for America although this is an American War and he is an American citizen who just doesn’t like our elected president.

Yes, jm, tell us all about it and how you have freedom of speech and you love the country and you are just picky etc. etc. etc.

You can still run to Canada and not have to worry about any American “boondoggles” that might require a little support from you.

By Steve

May 4, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this

After any debate, the first and most natural question is “who won?” Last night, the winner was obvious: Ronald Reagan.

Look, I know Reagan is the only president of the 20th century that Republicans really like. And I know that the debate was being held at the Reagan Library in California. But over the course of 90 minutes, the candidates specifically referenced the 40th president 20 times. If you count more oblique references (Gilmore thanked “the president in whose name this library is named”), the number climbs to 25. If you include references to Reagan by debate moderator Chris Matthews, well, we get pretty close to triple digits.

This just isn’t healthy. If this was a drinking game, players would have been three sheets to the wind within the first half hour.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

steve@12:22,

I’m just wondering. Whom did you expect Republicans to mention with favor? Clinton?

By Captain Freedom

May 4, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

Mr Wooten, you disappoint me in your blatant disregard for the major event in our nation yesterday…the National Day of Prayer.

There, on the Western lawn of our Nation’s capitol, the Godly Jeff Gannon Guckert stood in his role as spokesman for the event’s host, the International Bible Reading Association. Alas, only 37 of the 600 chairs held praying bodies, the rest of the Beltway’s denizens too busy huddling with their lawyers in advance of the coming Madam revelations. Either that or they were busy plotting the demise of America.

Anyway, the saved and reformed GannonGuckert was not disappointed in the small turnout. Back in the day, that would have been a small turnout for one of hi 8-inch cut marathons, but he has since turned his back on such activity, and is all about the Glory of God.

I also want to point out the incredible prayer technique of Our Leader (who incidentally, now wants us to refer to him as the Commander Guy, which strangely was one of GannonGuckert’s role playing names back when he was tricking out at $200 a pop). Notice that when Commander Guy prays (Bush, not GannonGuckert), he clneches his face and his eyes shut real tight and get all squinty. That shows that he is praying double-plus extra hard, because being a Leader, Decider, and Commander Guy means you have all kinds of heavy stuff that you need to pray about, and the tighter you squinch up your yes, the easier it is to hear when God speaks directly to you to reveal his plan for civilisation.

This is just another piece of good news that the traitors of the MSM never share with you.

By WestPoint75

May 4, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

I’m a West Point Grad and spent 21 years serving this country Dusty. Sometimes in places that you can’t imagine from the shelter of your keyboard. This war is the biggest mistake a U.S. president has ever made. Now question my patriotism from behind that keyboard Dusty. The guy sitting directly to my right is a former Army Ranger and Iraq vet whose brother is on his 2nd tour there. He is against this war. Dusty, you are not qualified to question our patriotism or the patriotism of any other dissenter in this country.

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

May 4, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

Here’s some more liberal media for you Jim:

Did you notice that your paper is calling for the resignation of Cobb’s only Democratic county commissioner?

I bet your buddy Cynthia Tucker is at wits end with that. Democrats are never wrong. We all know that.

By Camus

May 4, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Given that Republicans have held the White House for 37 of the past 55 years, and have held the Congress for most of the past 12, it seems there might be more than one character in this pantheon that would be worthy of praise. And how many House Speakers and Senate majority Leaders in the pst 57 years were GOP? And what about distinguished Minority Leaders during the years when the Dems held one or other chamber?

Is there really only one Republican that these candidates are comfortable associating themselves with?

What gives? Why the shame?

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

Capitan Freedom: Try Pig Latin. Wooten has never censored Pig Latin. (no matter how suggestive you write)

just watch this: Iway issedkay the arbiebay anditsbay whoway areway obviouslyway esbianlays.

Wooten doesn’t censor French, either no matter which orifice you refer to in a blog. Watch this: Tu est une deekhead.

See? totally got away with calling you a D****!

D’OH!!!

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

May 4, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this

Oh, and here’s another interesting nuggett:

Typical tax and spend liberal inner city mayor telling the people what they can and cannot do.

Over half of those polled hate this idea. Why should folks have to do anything that they don’t want to do. If I want to drive into Manhattan, I should be able to drive into Manhattan.

Dang liberal pinko nutjobs.

By jm

May 4, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this

Dusty@12:14 - why would I go to Canada, where it is cold, when I can go to Alabama like W did?

Until W has the stones to come clean on the costs of the war in Iraq (and how he intends to pay for it) and stops putting it on the credit card, I will continue to call it a boondoggle. The cost of fighting an open ended war in a msulim country did as much to bring about the collapse of the soviet union as President Reagan’s (and President Carter’s) defense build up did.

I consider mortgaging our future to China (and Saudi Arabia) a far greater threat to our future than Iraq or Islam ever was (or will be). It is awful hard to “talk tough” to the person who holds your mortgage note.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this

Capitan Freedom: Try Pig Latin. Wooten has never censored Pig Latin. (no matter how suggestive you write)

just watch this: Iway issedkay the arbiebay anditsbay whoway areway obviouslyway esbianlays.

Wooten doesn’t censor French, either no matter which orifice you refer to in a blog. Watch this: Tu est une deekhead.

See? totally got away with calling you a D****!

D’OH!!!

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this

The surge continues. We’re rifling through house after house looking for terrorists. We have to interview friendly Iraqis about where the terrorists are hiding. Here’s a common exchange happening as we speak: “Ma’am, did you say you saw a terrorists?”

Yes, I did.

“Well, what did he look like?”

He looka like an imam.

“No, I mean was he tall, clean shaven, blue eyes, you know, give us a description”

Yes

“Yes what?”

yes, he looka like an Imam.

“Sargent, hose this burka boob down, water board her, then bring her back for torture, I mean, interrogation”

Camera to abu graib’s pyramid of bodies and closeups of someone with their head in a commode.

“Okay, now where were we?”

I gonna tell you what the terrorist looka like now.

“Good, ma’am, now we’re getting somewhere, what did he look like?”

He looka like an imam.

D’OH!!!.

By DawgBite

May 4, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this

By Jim’s a Cherry Picker

May 4, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this Typical tax and spend liberal inner city mayor telling the people what they can and cannot do.

I didn’t realize that REPUBLICANS could be tax and spend liberals!

And by the way. That Mayor didn’t say that you couldn’t drive into Manhattan. Just that it will cost you 8 bucks to do so. What is the difference in that and privatizing highways and then charging all of us a toll to use them? You cons don’t seem to have a problem with that.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this

OK jm@12:36,

Why don’t you have “the stones” as you like to call it, to go to Alabama and join the National Guard like President Bush did? They could use your vast loyalty.

You are trying to imply (like a good Democrat) that the National Guard is not military service for the country. Not so. May I just call you a “doogle dodger”?

Then you branch off to “mortgages” and forgot to mention the thriving economy.

Your selective vision is not unexpected. Democrats do it all the time. Guess you haven’t noticed that this ia a great country and you are lucky to be here with all the freedom to have boondoogles. Democrats always forget to mention that.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

Dear West Point 75 @ 12:29, we appreciate your service, but with all due respect you are not competent to challenge Dusty. She posts her arguments with reasoning. Either post something of substance, or quit carping. “Who you are” does not matter - “what you say, and why” matters here.

By jm

May 4, 2007 1:06 PM | Link to this

Dusty@12:56 - if the economy is thriving, why do we still have a budget deficit?

By WestPoint75

May 4, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

jbmlaw, there are many others that post that have very reasoned arguments. I have been in combat jbmlaw. Have you? I am imminently qualified to challenge Dusty on her Rovian tactic of questioning the patriotism of those that excercise their right of dissent. Dissent is one of the most “American” things that one can do. The just excercise of a constitutional right. Lemmings like Dusty would have undoubtedly been good little subjects to the king back in the 1700s. Had the colonies been over populated with “patriots” like Dusty, we would undoubtedly still be subjects of the British crown today. Now jbmlaw, why don’t you explain your qualifications to challenge me. And while your at it why don’t you go ahead and explain to the rest of us why one can’t be against this war, support the troops, but cannot be classified as “patriots”. Let’s hear it jbmlaw.

By Courtney

May 4, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this

Dusty wrote, “Why don’t you have “the stones” as you like to call it, to go to Alabama and join the National Guard like President Bush did?”

jbmlaw wrote, “[Dusty] posts her arguments with reasoning.”

That was a good one, jbmlaw. That kind of satire would even make Captain Freedom proud.

By Art

May 4, 2007 1:18 PM | Link to this

WPG75, jbmlaw is one of the biggest frauds on this blog. He can’t dazzle anyone with his pseudo intellectual brilliance so he tries to baffle us with unadulterated BS. He is just another shill who, when he or any of his pets here are legitimately challenged goes into that mode that you just saw in his reply to you. jbmlaw is not qualified for much of anything when it comes down to it. Just another self important blowhard that is more manure than substance.

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

West Point 75 is completely correct in challenging Dusty. When the facts of her argument are challenged, she immediately casts any opposition as unpatriotic and unAmerican. In her 12:56 post she challenges jm to serve in the military to prove he has…um, proper support for this country. She carps on about how “liberals” don’t support Bush or the war. And they hate the troops. Blah, blah, blah, ad nauseum.

She’s the one who is placing such weight on being in the military.

For someone who constantly insists she is the only one on the side of the troops, the challenge of an honest-to goodness soldier causes a meltdown in her Dusty-bot circuits. I’m interested in seeing her twisted rationalization in response to West Point… provided she has the stones that seem to be occupying her mind.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

Well … uh … because … um, you just can’t, that’s all. Um, I have an appointment. Good day all.

By JK

May 4, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

WestPoint75, thank you for your service to our country, and for speaking your conscience in a straightforward manner!! It’s citizens like YOU (not the self-trumpeting, excusing-making “patriots”) who give me hope in these anxious times. Thank you!

P.S. y’all: Don’t be dissin’ on my Rage boys now. (Currently rocking Audioslave with hottie Chris Cornell.) Their militant poetry, and the truth therein, is timeless.

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

May 4, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

DawgBite,

I’m using a literary device commonly referred to as irony here.

You see, in order to mess wtih Jim’s head and point out hypocrisy on this blog, I’m employing some of the same semantic pandering tactics used by Jim and his followers.

In this case, a Republican mayor is addressing a problem with a solution that could be labeled as “big government”. And he’s doing it for “green” purposes…and imposing his will on people to boot.

So I’m referring to it as another example of a tax and spend big government liberal at work. Just the kind of thing that Wooten likes to Cherry Pick out of the ether to make his case about how “liberals” are all bad and runing this country.

So the irony here is that Bloomberg is actually a very wealthy Republican.

Worlds are colliding. Sorry to confuse.

By DawgBite

May 4, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

Well … uh … because … um, you just can’t, that’s all. Um, I have an appointment. Good day all.

Well well well!!! Look at ole jbmfraud cut and run. You have no credibility left here after that one jbmlaw. Aquagirl and WestPoint75 kicked off in your fat azz and you ran like a rabbit.

By The Truth Hurts

May 4, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this

Why don’t you have “the stones” as you like to call it, to go to Alabama and join the National Guard like President Bush did? They could use your vast loyalty.

Dusty, I have a brilliant idea. Why don’t you join up and then you could be the next Jessica Lynch. You know, the military could lie about what a hero you wereby shooting up all your rounds fighting off the enemy. Then you and the Tillman family would have something in common.

Of course then they could correct the information once all the facts were verified.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this

West Point75

Somehow I missed your piece while reading the pig Latin one. Oh, did I dare to ruffle the feathers of so great a one as thou?? OH, and I sound “Rovian”? Well, great Jehovian, how could I do a dastardly deed like that?

Congrats on your service and to your friends who now support the troops by being honorary “dissenters”. Did you enjoy dissenters at home while you were off serving? Did you support those going to Canada?

Oh dear, more petty questions. But you are a bit mixed up. In the Revolutionary War, the Boston tea Party was not given by cut’n’runners (known at this time as Democrats). They fought against oppressors.

If our fight against terrorists and the Iraq War bother you, follow the few by joining a protest march. They are all the rage now with “dissenters”.

To paraphrase General MacArthur, “Old West Pointers never die. They just fade away.” Try it.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this

Dear WestPoint75 @ 1:10, regrettably, unlike most military officers, you anticipate unquestioned obedience rather than offering cogent rationale for your conclusions. Dusty’s logic is well ahead of yours. Obviously I hit a nerve for you or someone, note the namejackers since my last post. Credentials do not matter except to the sheep of the left - we live in a world of ideas.

By jm

May 4, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this

Actually, I kind of enjoy jbmlaw’s posts. He is the closest thing to a Hayek purist on this blog.

By Ygelesias

May 4, 2007 2:19 PM | Link to this

Rudy Giuliani repeated Ronald Reagan’s name more than any of his rivals last night, but one of the references went a little too far.

Chris Matthews had raised a plausible hypothetical: The prime minister of Israel calls the White House to alert the president that Israel is about to strike Iran’s nuclear sites and he wants U.S. help. Giuliani responded:

“It really depends on what our intelligence says. I mean, the reality is, the use of military force against Iran would be very dangerous. It would be very provocative. The only thing worse would be Iran being a nuclear power. It’s the worst nightmare of the Cold War, isn’t it, the nuclear weapons in hands of an irrational person, an irrational force. Ahmadinejad is clearly irrational. He has to understand it’s not an option. He cannot have nuclear weapons. And he has to look at an American president, and he has to see Ronald Reagan.”

Is that the version of Ronald Reagan who sold the Iranians weapons, or it is the version that sought to check Iranian power by sending Don Rumsfeld to Baghdad to assure Saddam Hussein that the United States didn’t really mind if he used poison gas to attack the Kurdish civilian population?

By Don't flatter yourself windbag

May 4, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

The only nerve of mine (namejacker) you hit is in my sphincter. I like to pick on you because you are a big, ol’ fat pompus gasbag. I also believe you are a hermaphrodite, ie you’re Dusty, too.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 2:30 PM | Link to this

Dear JK @ 1:38, we respect differences in taste here, but that I find Rage almost as funny as Weird Al.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

Dear jm @ that is the highest, and regrettably undeserved, compliment I could receive.

Dear DFYW @ 2:24, I acknowledge the gasbag part, but I am 6’0” 160 lbs, not fat by any physical measure. And to Dusty’s great relief, too old to be part of her generation

By Don't flatter yourself windbag

May 4, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

I was referring to your head.

By deegee

May 4, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this

The most shocking thing about this whole DC Madame scandal is that the Madame claims that some of her clients would ask for women in their 50s. What??? They can’t get enough of menopausal women at home?

By WestPoint75

May 4, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

Dusty, the right of those people to dissent is exactly WHY I was serving. I took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States which includes the unadulterated right to disagree. And in answer to your question as to how I felt about dissenters when I was being shot at; my mother was a dissenter and I am 100% positive that she supported me and all of the other troops in the field. The fight for freedom includes the defence of the FREEDOM to dissent.

Now jbmlaw…idea man supreme. Tell me oh wise one, just exactly how Dusty’s “ideas” are so far advanced beyond mine or anyone elses on this blog. Her “ideas” sound more like proslytizing to many of us here. And jbmlaw, you have done a masterful job of avoiding a detailed explanation of why dissent makes one unpatriotic. If you cannot articulate that jbmlaw, you are proving another bloggers idea that you are nothing but smoke, mirrors, and BS to be true. We are waiting jbmlaw.

By @@

May 4, 2007 2:52 PM | Link to this

Oh “my goodness” Jim!

Tell me that you didn’t just mention “prostitutes” and left-handled “Rosie” within the same column.

How in the heck did you “palm” that ace and get away with it?

Whoops! I am so sorry. I should be ashamed of myself.

I’ll be needing some time to think about my indiscretions.

See ‘ya later Jim.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this

Dear Aquagirl@1:21

Of course I was wrong to think that liberals don’t support Bush or the war. How could I be so mistaken!!!

Oh but you must keep up. jm and I were discussing dissenters and he suggested that Bush took the easy way out in Alabama so I suggested jm to try the same “easy” way to ease his discomfort with boondoogles. There now. See how easy it is to follow.

By If you're going to be so condescending ...

May 4, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this

… why use three exclamation marks when one question mark is called for?

Your sweet tea, syrupy smart@$$edness is nauseating.

By David Israel

May 4, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

Aquagirl can take Dusty in a match of wits, fists, sticks or stones.

Vegas has a line on it.

By NotSoFastJim

May 4, 2007 3:24 PM | Link to this

If you’re going to praise the AJC for being a watchdog, perhaps you should explain why AJC higher ups squashed any follow up to Paul Donsky’s reports of suspicious CRCT test scores a few years ago.

Five schools had a 50 point gain in one year. The one school board member who had actual teaching experience said that there was no way that could legitimately happen, and numerous education experts called it into question as well.

Yet other than the initial report, Donsky let the story drop. The rumor is he was pressured to do so, and based on what he reported initially, there’s no way he wouldn’t want to do a follow up.

Since you’re singing the praises of the AJC on this one, why don’t you bring Donsky on to tell the whole story of why the watchdog suddenly went to sleep on what very well might have been a case of widespread cheating in the system?

By Vegas promoter

May 4, 2007 3:32 PM | Link to this

We have a line on Tanya Harding too but I wouldn’t want to be compared to trailer trash like her.

Tanya rumbles in the jungle.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 3:32 PM | Link to this

Indescretions? @@: Are you saying that you’re a lesbian too? Boy was I wrong about you. A thousand pardons!

Takin’ it all back. Suddenly the wooten blogs breaks out from the pack!!

Pysychedelic shack! Groove on!

Miller Time officically declared Friday, 3:23 pm May 4, 2007. (four more months till the rapture and armegeddon, both of which will occur on the same day ruining the same miller time, (is there no end to religious fanaticism)?

At what temperature can beer be called Ice Cold? If it’s ice cold, then how could you drink it, it’d be a glacier? Then you would have to call it glacier cold. Then they couldn’t serve it on ships, or they’d all end up like the titanic.

ANd what exactly is a wine spritzer? If there’s one thing I hate, it’s people who order wine spritzers at miller time. If they need to spritz anything, let them grab a hose like everyone else does. I think we need to redefine ettiquette on friday afternoons for the bar crowd. They’ve all let themselves go completely out of control. Pass the nuts. Pass the pretzels. Can I bum a cigarette? My doctor wont let me smoke, so I dont buy them…….what?

What?

By Greenwald

May 4, 2007 3:33 PM | Link to this

Earlier this week, after the president vetoed Congress’ war-funding bill, Democratic leaders posed a challenge to the president and other war supporters: come up with a policy to “responsibly end this war”.

As it happens, war supporters do have a plan to end the war. A group of Bush backers have even formed a new organization with former Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) to promote their policy. It’s called “We Win. They Lose.” In this case, that’s the group and the policy.

Here is the group’s founding declaration, as articulated in a letter to House Speaker Pelosi.

Congress has passed and President Bush has vetoed H.R. 1591, the Iraq Surrender Act of 2007.

This legislation, which you worked to pass, sets a timetable for surrender. It pulls the rug out from under our troops. That is shameful and wrong.

Your actions have already emboldened the enemy. Violent jihadists now know that the elected leadership of Congress would undermine the troops by holding their funding hostage to demands for surrender.

This Congress would bring us back to the dark days of the 1970s, when the world doubted our staying power. Except only much worse. Withdraw in April 2008, and on May 1, Iraq becomes an unchecked den of terrorism at the heart of the Middle East — a new base for the same people that struck our homeland on September 11th.

I stand with our troops. I stand for victory. I support the President’s veto and will urge my representatives to vote to sustain it.

There can be one and only one outcome in Iraq: We win, they lose.

Was this silly declaration written by Dusty/jbmlaw? I regret to report that this isn’t a joke.

I visited the group’s website to take a closer look at exactly what the organization’s war policy includes. I quickly realized this is a waste of time — there is no policy. There are no details. Nothing is fleshed out. The policy is “we win; they lose.” Their letter to Pelosi is the entirety of their message.

In other words, while policy makers in Washington work on formulating some kind of effective strategy for the future, these guys — including several leading conservative bloggers and the former Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate — have come up with a bumper-sticker slogan, which they believe is all anyone needs to know.

I’m afraid the right has been reduced to soundbite-only discourse. Their preferred phrases — cut and run, defeatist, surrender, we win, they lose — are no longer than three syllables, but they have nothing to add to the discussion. Apparently, if it’s not a shallow platitude, it’s not worth saying.

All of these people are hopelessly confused. The fact that they’ve come to dominate the Republican imagination is truly frightening.

http://wewintheylose.com/

By ABS

May 4, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this

Dusty, Your hate for liberals is pretty well documented here, but I have one really simple question…you can answer yes or no…

Do you think George W. Bush is an effective leader and do you support him 100%?

I know this may sound like a stupid question for most here on this blog, but she, like so many neo-cons on here, simply bash liberals and Muslims, etc. They very rarely just come right out and say they support Bush, it’s often inferred of course, but never just blatantly out there…of course they’ll call us unpatriotic for criticizing him, and scream “USA, USA,” …so while I’m opening myself up for name calling by Dusty (I expect her answer to have the word, idiot, or a*****, or something like that) and the likes, and to the others, it’s a WTF? kind of question, I just really want her to answer the question, yes or no.

You see, I’ve made some observations here…the neo-cons love to bash liberals, but they really never have anything positive to say about the Republican party, except that they are better than us and that’s that.

So anyway, simple question Dusty, I want to know EXACTLY what you think about the leadership abilities of George W. Bush.

By jm

May 4, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this

Dusty - Unfortunately, W would have to raise the enlistment age a few more years for me to be eligible for even the Alabama National Guard. Though truth be told, I am in much better physical shape than some of my old co-workers who were called back in to active service because of Iraq.

I will make a deal with you. I will be more than happy to provide W with all the funds he is requesting for Iraq providing, he can do so and and maintain a balanced budget. That would mean he would either have to increase revenue (taxes) or cut expenses (services). It is a simple request. I am just asking you and W to put your money where your mouth (and support) are.

If W can do that, he will have my support in Iraq.

Afghainistan is another matter, I feel W has done far too little there.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

westpoint75,

My, my, you preach about the right to free speech yet claim my free speech is nothing but proselytizing (which is the correct spelling by the way) You speak out both sides of your mouth. You fight for free speech but you don’t want to hear my opinion, just yours.

It is not free speech that is the problem. It is the disloyal people of this country who use it to tear the country apart. People who support the troops by telling them they are fighting for nothing.

That is what I fight against. I fight against this verbal non-support of our troops while claiming they support them. What absurdity! Or even worse, to think that this does not harm the country. That is the depths of density.

West Pointer, how did you ever get there? Of course, your mother was a dissenter. She didn’t want you killed. I bet she was not out in any protest parade. She was probably praying and hoping you would get home as soon as possible. I know ‘cause my oldest son was in the military many years. My husband and father were in the military. I supported all of them. I did not feel the need to preach against my country to do it.

I also feel that I have the right to free speech as much as any citizen, even if I did not go to West Point.

By Art

May 4, 2007 3:45 PM | Link to this

ABS, you are wasting your time trying to pin them down. When seriously challenged in a point blank manner they disappear until you go away or just continue to use the same old tired tactics to deflect your questions. jbmlaw is a prime example. He is incapable of directly answering the specific question posed of him at 2:49. Dusty is the same story. She is incapable of telling us why a person can be against the war and at the same time support the men fighting it.

By @@

May 4, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this

CornShucker:

No, my euphemisms didn’t imply that I was a lesbian. Don’t get too excited with your speculations.

I’m married to a male and like my man sober. That way he knows what a prize I am.

It would appear that your afternoon delights have left you incoherent, unsightly, and missing your Mark.

Sleep it off! Better luck tomorrow.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

Iraq War? We win THEY lose? Think about that for a minute. If we were only fighting a real country with real bonds of nationalism forging their resistance, then we could indeed win.

But we are fighting a sentiment, a global idea, that was born not of nationalism or patriotism or geo-political ardor, but rather we are fighting a gossamer specter; an abominable godhead of divine intuition that lives in the reactive mutations of arbitrary motivations which serendipitously form the equal and oppostite reaction to anything we do. This plasma of hate lives only in the membranes of a mind seeking paradise.

No smart bomb, no support of any troops, no tank can even touch it.

Victory in Iraq would require brainwashing of every jihadist on the planet. Victory in Iraq would have to mean a global victory over the war on terror. And we dont even know who the enemy is or where they dwell.

But we do have an eyewitness. And she talked to CNN reporters: “Did you see the terrorist?”

Yes.

“Well…”

He looka like a Imam.

By JP

May 4, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

JBM, I wouldn’t disagree or say that their sentiments aren’t similar (Rosie and Rage) — however, the suggestion of causality is downright 100% hilarious!

By ABS

May 4, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this

Art, I’m willing to give her a chance…that will proove my point if she can’t. Neo-cons spew praise for everything conservative, but I’ll bet that very few even know what it means to be a true conservative…so we’ll see. I’ll wait until 5:00 when I go home for the day. Who knows? She may surprise us with her brilliance. Bwahahahahahahah!

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

Dear me, Dusty has now accused someone of trying to supress her free speech that actually went out and fought for it. Dusty, honey, your claim to military fame and experience is based around spreading your legs. Leave the fighting and thinking to the grownups.

And nobody is trying to squelch your right to free speech, you seem to have that confused with not just nodding along with your ridiculous blathering. Many of us do take umbrage at your repeated troop-bashing, especially if we are/were TROOPS.

Okay, let’s hear some more “you all hate the troops, even though you are the troops, when I’m not, but know everything about supporting the troops.”

Because that is your only argument.You are as inept with mental weapons as you are with physical ones, oh leader of the KeyBoard Warriors. That’s a lot of disdain for West Point, who graduated from a place where you couldn’t last fifteen minutes. They aren’t impressed by waving a yellow ribbon and blogging there.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

You see, Iraq isn’t a country, and it never was. It was a cartographer’s presumption. An arbitrary line on a map. The british and french forged that particular cartography with oil in mind, and the tribes were split.

The tribes were split by mapmakers.

Therefore, any reunion of the split tribes would become a defacto invasion of one country into another.

I dont see a problem. do you?

There are tribal links that extend from Kurdistan to China. There are populations that want to rejoin one another, but these populations could only unite if all the region’s borders were obsolete.

Do you now see what Bush has done? He’s brought the world to a line in the sand which has been so blurred by hatred and violence that we dont even know if we’ve stepped over it, which would necessarily ensure the world’s doom.

Pass the pretzels. Pass the nuts.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this

Aquagirl, you should know that @@ would waterboard you, of course, what @@ doesn’t know is that waterboarding is fun for Aquaman, Aquagirl, and Aquabarbiebandits. Especially the lesbian ones.

A simple Point of order.

Please continue. (didn’t mean to butt in)

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this

ABS,

You’re easy. George Bush is strong, intelligent and brave. He is pursuing the protection of this country with foresight. He had rather fight terrorists abroad than on the streets of America as they prefer.

He is not perfect any more than most human beings. I prefer a leader who stands up for what he has been elected and for what he thinks is right.

jm,

You tell me how to fight wars, fight hurricanes and provide security on the “cheap” during war time and I will tell you how to balance the budget. OK?

Art,

You are a day late and a dollar short. Don’t tell ME how to support the troops and be against the war at the same time. You need to TELL THE TROOPS. They don’t understand and I can see why. Too bad you don’t.

By jm

May 4, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this

Dusty@4:06 - I guess this means you don’t want to pay more taxes or have any of your services cut. Now who wants war on the cheap?

By ABS

May 4, 2007 4:13 PM | Link to this

Dusty, Thank you…I just wanted you to say it, or rather write it, without any name calling.

Another question, and please feel free to ask me one if you wish…

What does it mean to be a conservative?

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 4:15 PM | Link to this

There’s only one way to support the troops in Iraq: GIVE THEM A F’n MISSION!!!

Having them mill around waiting to get picked off is no mission and certainly not support.

Like take a roadside checkpoint. The troops have to stay inside a quandrant that can be blown to smithereens in due time with little or no planning at all. What kind of war is that? The economy of Iraq is such that there’s alot of traffic. You cant secure nothing on any road against the flow of heavy traffic. Anyone can bring any amount of blasting caps, C4, nitroglycerin, cherry bombs, gunpowder, dynomite, liquid nitrogen, hydrogen bombs, anthrax inhalants, hell, Ive even heard the terrorists are trucking in fertilizer to mix with diesel fuel oil to blow to kingdom come anything they want.

The problem is we just dont know which Iraqis are the good guys and which are the terrorists. They all look identical and act identical and drive identical vehicles in a heavy flow of traffic.

that’s not supporting the troops. That’s an unwinnable war.

Those are the facts, jack.

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this

CornShucks, your posts make me think I’ve wandered into a Monty Python skit. Alas, I will leave the lesbian waterboarding to others (including Aquaman? Who knew! I must tell the rest of the Justice League), as I am madly in lust with Captain Freedom. Only a He-man such as the Captain could keep me, um, content. If ya know what I’m sayin’.

By Doug

May 4, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this

Dusty you are dumber than a box of rocks. Give us all a specific example where someone has said that they do not support the troops. The only lack of support is for the war itself. Be specific Dust for brains.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 4:25 PM | Link to this

Conservative: Noun, derivation is from the french for “croissant with liver” which was the perpetual choice of sandwiches when Louis the Fourteenth, the Sun King ruled France. it implies a group think of easily manipulated opinion mongerers who hide behind platitudes and only use talking points which berate obsolete behavior stereotypes.

It also means a-hole.

By ABS

May 4, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this

Now CornShucks, that’s just plain mean. I want to hear it from our friend Dusty.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 4:35 PM | Link to this

Aquagirl,

Stay on the shallow end of the pool because you are not thinking “deep”.

I claim no fame for being in the military. I support them. I appreciate the service of WestPoint74 but not his attitude. He claims total respect for his service yet has no respect for the Commander-in-Chief.

If my opinion is not freedom of speech, then I have been misled. I thought mine was just as “free” as any other American. To prove my case, I might post here anytime I feel like it and with MY opinion. And as Omar Khayyam wrote in the Rubaiyat, …”nor all they Piety nor Wit shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.”

By ABS

May 4, 2007 4:40 PM | Link to this

You see Aquagirl and WestPoint…if you are in the military, you can’t have an opinion or an individual thought. Sorry, they didn’t beat that out of you guys at boot camp. Those great U.S. military patriots at Abu Ghraib did their patriotic duty without question…they served their country well without hesitation and never thought to themselves “Is this right?”

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

You appreciate the service of WestPoint75 and then address him like a first-grader when he simply calls you on your troop-bashing. You aren’t fit to lick that man’s boots. You can fling your opinion around all you want, but his expression of opinion is aiding and abetting the enemy? M’kay. You’re only crying because of the verbal spanking. Nobody’s demanded that Jim pull your posts or any such nonsense.

Oh, ho ho ho! That part about the “deep” thinking will keep me laughing all weekend. Jay Leno is waiting to steal your punchlines.

Honey, you’re a mealy-mouthed dependent wife. I’ve seen your type a million times at the PX. And a million more times when we would get b**ing and moaning from the whiner wives calling the Commander about PT being too early or crap like that. Some women supported their husbands. Some thought they were the centerpiece of the military. You, Dusty are one of the latter.

Post your opinion. Look like a fool. Who’s to stop you? But what you are is obvious. A tool who doesn’t support the troops.

By WestPoint75

May 4, 2007 4:58 PM | Link to this

Dusty, you have an absolute right to your freedom of speech as do others. As for respecting the commander-in-chief, what I respect is the OFFICE of the commander-in-chief. I would obey the orders of the commander-in-chief were I still in the military. I have followed those orders from 3 commanders-in chief, to include Bill Clinton which at times was hard to stomach. And really Dusty, I don’t think that anything I’ve written here today has disrespected President Bush personally. His policies are a different matter however. Dusty, military officers follow even the orders that they personally disagree with. That is the respect that we have to show the commander-in-chief. We are not duty bound to agree with those orders. Just carry them out.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

jm..duh..

YOU were supposed to tell me how to do it on the “cheap”. Read back again.

Doug…wow

You don’t support the war but you do support the troops. That is like saying that Delta is going to stop flying and shut off funds but it will not affect the employees. Oh yeah. Good thinking there.

ABS,

You heard from me already. Did you read it? That does help.

Cornshucks,

Please send your information to General Petaeus. I am sure he would like all your vital on site facts.

By the way, the mission is to W…I…N ! I guess the DNC got mixed up and told you “Lose!”. Hope you have it straight now.

Bye now. Dinner time…..

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

Dear WestPoint74 @ 2:49, I credit your current post as holding a thought and argument; your prior entry had neither. As to your bizarre need for demonstration of the logic of my friend Dusty we need not go back before 12:56 today. At 12:56. my friend Dusty, picking up on a false logic, posted: “Why don’t you … go to Alabama and join the National Guard like President Bush did? They could use your vast loyalty. You are trying to imply (like a good Democrat) that the National Guard is not military service for the country. Not so. May I just call you a “doogle dodger”? ,,, Your selective vision is not unexpected. Democrats do it all the time… ” She took the prior post’s false premise, exposed it (sarcastically, admittedly), proved the falsity by presenting the obviously false but immediately logical derivation, followed by additional clever sarcasm. Note that none of those were in your prior post. High argument compared to your prior post.

In your present post you offer “proselytizing” as mutually exclusive with “logical” - a false apposition, and an embarrassing logical flaw in my mind. You will find Conservatives proselytize using logic; letiusts, on the other hand, rely exclusive on “credibility,” thus a “cult” based rationale.

In your 2:49 post you end by creating the straw man argument “ you have done a masterful job of avoiding a detailed explanation of why dissent makes one unpatriotic” as if I – or anyone on this blog for that matter – ever made such a foolish argument. Suggest you study Dusty’s style, to strengthen your capacity to argue intelligently.

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Oh, I guess the dinner bell cut off Dusty’s reply to WestPoint. Well, that does happen with those stay-at-home Dusty types. Never met a Little Debbie pie they didn’t like.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this

Dear DFYW @ 2:36, thanks for clarification. You meant “fat” as in fatuous. I was about to accuse you of disparaging both weight-challenged and birth-deformed Americans simultaneously – we expect no better from Leftists - but you obviously intended only the latter.

By Doug

May 4, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

Dusty I guess if you don’t love the actions of one of your children, you can’t still love your child. That seems to be what you are saying with your Delta analogy. Is that it Dusty? Everything has to be all or none?

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

Dear Art @ 3:45, you are technically correct – unlike our leftist community, I work for a living. From time-to-time must interrupt my dissemination of genius to actually earn a buck,

By jm

May 4, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

Dusty - I suggest you re-read my post. I never said anything about doing it on the cheap. That was your creation. I said with a balanced budget. W is already doing it on the cheap.

By WestPoint75

May 4, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this

jbmlaw, I have not said one word about President Bush’s service in the National Guard. Cite a specific please. I have only commented on the fact that to say one has to support the war in order to support the troops is rather ludicrous.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Dear WestPoint75, perhaps I misread your request. I thought you asked for two demonstrations: (1) the logic of my friend Dusty, and (2) a defect in your own work. That is what I delivered. That you have no posted anything about the National Guard has nothing to do with the quality of Dusty’s essay, nor with the quality of your argument.

By jm

May 4, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

jbmlaw - I was the one who brought up Alabama. When Dusty suggested I head to Canada, I told her, like W I preferred Alabama, where the weather was warmer.

By WestPoint75

May 4, 2007 5:34 PM | Link to this

And who are you to judge jbmlaw? Would you care to expound. Tell us what makes you the annointed one. Give us your unique qualifications. The ones that make you the judge of the quality of the work of others. Please jbmlaw. We would all like to give you your props.

By Art

May 4, 2007 5:37 PM | Link to this

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

Dear Art @ 3:45, you are technically correct – unlike our leftist community, I work for a living. From time-to-time must interrupt my dissemination of genius to actually earn a buck,

Just how many ambulances does Ken Nugent make you chase a day to hit your quota jbmfraud?

By Alan

May 4, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

I watched the “debate” last night of the 10 Republican candidates (all white males) for U.S. President. Listening to these men made me shudder, especially with some of them, Brownback, for instance. While I don’t think any of these men would propose hanging homosexuals, it was clear to me that gay people certainly do not fit into their rigidly conforming club.

In their America, they want all the people to be like loyal troops in the military and just strictly follow the rules which they write.

There was plenty of the “preserving marriage” and “strengthening marriage” rhetoric and we know what that means. Also, those “activist judges” are still enemies of the country and we know what will happen if the Democrats get the White House: “activist” judges will be appointed.

There was none of the promise to bring the country together with liberty and justice for all. No promise to advocate civil rights for all, but plenty of words about what and who they are against.

Homosexuals don’t get hanged in American just for being homosexual, but we sure get our share of hate.

By Cindy

May 4, 2007 5:48 PM | Link to this

WestPoint75, you should feel priveleged that jbmlaw honored you with so much of his time today. It is not very often that a person gets the benefit of such extensive dialogue with a bigger than life BSer like jbmlaw. He is a legend in his own mind.

By ABS

May 4, 2007 5:49 PM | Link to this

Dusty, You did indeed answer my first question, and yes, I read it…then I posed another question which you haven’t answered. Dusty, these patriots are burying you and your only defense comes from a so-called lawyer…again, you’ve made no intelligent response.

I’ll respect your opinion as I did from the answer to my first question, but you’ve failed to answer what it means to be a conservative.

A true conservative is nothing, and I mean, nothing like you. You are a hate-monger with absolutely no means of communication without name calling…very juvenile I might add.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

Dear jm @ 5:28, you are correct, but our friend West Point did not solicit analysis of Dusty’s response to him - he asked for a demonstration of logic by Dusty. Her response to you - although not necessarily what I would have written - answered that concern of West Point.

Incidentally, your posts were excellent today. I did not agree with most, but your arguments were worthy and showed good humor, my compliments.

By Aquagirl

May 4, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

Now don’t be so harsh, he received the invaluable advice to study and imitate Dusty’s arguments. That’ll get him so very far in life.

Jbmlaw is so much better than Those West Point Perfessers at mentoring.

By jbmlaw

May 4, 2007 5:58 PM | Link to this

Dear West Point @ 5:34, you persist in the leftist “cult” basis of argument - what I argue means nothing to you, only who I am to offer the argument. Cindy is partially right, I generally exchange arguments only with those who have potential for intelligent discourse. I am unfamiliar with earlier work by you - welcome to the blog - and I urge you to study the form of my friend Southern Democrat when he posts next. He is one of the two brightest minds on the blog - the other is Midsouth Philosopher - but Southern shares your general world perspective.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

I still miss the barbie bandits.

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 8:02 AM | Link to this

{{{PUBLIC EDITOR: AJC readers can expect change, not lack of coverage By Angela Tuck The Atlanta Urinal-Constitution Published on: 05/05/07 When you are remaking a business, everything is on the table. In the past few months, top editors at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution have been working their way through a massive restructuring with a single goal in mind: stronger and more unique local coverage in print and online.}}}

Yeah, right, in other words, being anti American sniveling Coward busy bodies has not been good for business, go figure, surprise, surprise.

I got an idea on how to help save some money, how about if you stop sending your low rent pinko army out on Thursday to throw your trash in my yard?

Plus think of all the fuel that would be saved, the trees that wouldn’t be cut down and the landfill space that would be freed up, or doesn’t that stuff matter to you “Earth Lovers?”

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{BAGHDAD — The leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq purportedly criticized the country’s largest Sunni political party on Saturday for participating in the political process and branded its leader, Vice President Tariq al-Hashemi, a “criminal.”}}}

All these punk as-s women and children murdering Cowards have left is to whine, much like you candy as-s liberals.

Sniff, sniff, nobody wants to side up with the depraved killers of innocents anymore, boo hoo.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{Analysts: Yahoo-Microsoft not good fit-Urinal}}}

Actually, these two are perfect for each other, two peas in a pod.

A dumb as-s monolith like Microsoft, with their stupid slow web browser and these filthy anti Americans from Yahoo, who by the way, can kis-s my as-s.

Look at this filth from Yahoo, Al Jazeera wanna be’s.

Pair these two pieces of sh-it together, it will make google and Mozilla that much stronger.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 8:52 AM | Link to this

Paris Hilton behind bars? I see four made4TV movies, two cinema releases, a thirty-three part documentary and a Howard Stern/Hugh Heffner reality TV show about nymphs in stripes.

What do you think, Simon Cowell? “I cant believe what she wore to her sentencing. And where did she get those shoes?”

45 days in jail. Isnt’ that how long the defenders of the alamo held out? Well none of us will last that long, we surrender, Paris!!

Paris! Paris! Paris! Paris!!

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 8:55 AM | Link to this

PARIS!!!

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:07 AM | Link to this

Lesson for celebrities: let a limo take you bar-hopping, because when a celebrity drives drunk, a judge HAS to make an example of that celebrity because everybody’s watching. Are you listening David Hastlehoff?

The DUI problem in this country is too great to give Paris a pass here.

Paris! 45 days of Peeking! Imagine being her cellmate? Do they have co-ed prisons? I predict that all of Hollywood will break some sort of law to get to party in jail with Paris. They’ll be breaking windows on the Sunset strip!

PARIS! PARIS!!

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this

Who needs the Barbie Bandits when you’ve got Paris in Prison.

I love Paris in the Spring, AND in the Prison.

Paris Paris

PARIS!!!

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:15 AM | Link to this

I wonder if Paris will greet her incarcerators with open legs? (and arms)

I really love the name paris. It gets better everytime you read it, write it, or say it.

Say Paris.

PARIS!

see? it got better.

PARIS!! even better

Paris paris paris paris paris (I’m gonna blow my cool)

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this

You do have to give Paris props for not uttering the phrase, “It’s Hot”, once during her statement to the judge at her sentencing.

We did manage to get a copy of her statement and have exclusively provided it to the Wooten blog: “Oh my gawd! I didn’t know I was drunk. I didn’t know I was driving. Did I really get pulled over? oh, yes, right, I’m sorry too.. ”

Judge: “Shut up, young lady or I’ll have you restrained. 45 days!. Bailiff….”

“45 Days? But what about my dog? What about my pussycat? What about my Pmmffff….” (camera to lawyer muffling Paris’s mouth with his hands, preventing her from aggravating the judge and possible increasing her sentence)

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this

Paris. Is she THAT beautiful? i honestly dont know. I cant get past her whole thing, HER!

paris is prison: It’s gonna take me a long time to get over this one. It’s too much for one man. We have to share this fantasy and help each other through it. I’m geting on, you know. Please, join my websight, ?Paris in the Springtime without Springs on her bed on account she’s Paris in Prison.com”.

It was tough enough with the Barbie Bandits Behind Bars thing. I nearly didn’t make it. I was a mess. I’m okay now though, at least I was, till thei Paris in Prison thing.

Just when I thought I was out, Paris pulled me back in.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this

Told ya wingnuts are dangerous

The NRA is lobbying for suspected terrorists to keep their guns.

There is a wingnut LSU student who threatened Hillary.

We need to spy on all wingnuts and send them to Gitmo. They are dangerous.

Paris gets locked up but nothing for w and cheney on their illegal occupation.

40% of the troops say torture is ok.

God save America.

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:36 AM | Link to this

Chicks on Chaingangs is the hottest concept know to man. If there were no justice system, we’d put all our women behind bars. What a Utopia. Think of it: We’d worry not about people breaking out of prison, but breaking into prison. The DC madam would have to set up all the conjugal visits. Then we could all just go home and not have to hear any nagging.

Life could be a dream.

Sha na na naah

By Pillowbiters for Bush

May 5, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this

Saturday morning on the Wooten blog - stupidity from Andi, inanity from CornShucks.

Some things never change. Especially the stupid shiite from Andi.

By jbmlaw

May 5, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this

Dear Pillowbiter, lighten up, Cornshucks is pretty funny. We need more humor in the world.

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

What does Getalife think of torturing prisoners now that there’s Paris in Prison?

I love Paris

In less than a year, some prison guard will publish his memoirs, “Waterboarding Paris”, a sure best seller. The last sentence is certain to read, “…and she liked it.”

Paris!

By Sailor

May 5, 2007 9:56 AM | Link to this

The Sailor said Andi, you’re a fine girl…

Andi tortured me last night.

With her tongue. On my nether parts…

I survived.

;>

Hey, maybe we should send her to Gitmo - she’d get those boys to talkin’!

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this

WD, you can add Google to the Yahoo anti-American liberal neoMarxist pigs.

Random Saturday AM thought. Why didn’t the Republican presidential candidates tell PMSNBC’s neopinks to go F themselves? Why did they agree to be interviewed by a filthy dirty RAT like P!ss Matthews? Why didn’t they stomp up and down and throw a tantrum like the dirty RATs did over their rejection of FoxNews as a debate forum?

Oh, Republicans are adults. I knew that.

By Sailor

May 5, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

The only problem with last night is that Andi brought her galpal Bi Danish along.

Look at that fat ugly cow (bull?) for more than a few seconds and you’ll puke.

So I shut my eyes while Andi worked her mad skills…

;>

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

“Some things never change. Especially the stupid shiite from Andi.”

That’s how a stinking filthy liberal pig counters Conservative thought. Brilliant.

Liberalism - indoctrinating one unused mind at a time

By War W******* for Bush

May 5, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

Greetings to my fellow coward Markus. Hey lady!

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

I’ve got it all figured out now with the disease of liberalism. When the stock market falls, it’s Bush’s fault and his policies are the reason. No mention of the rich losing money, and no mention of the poor being hurt (not that the “poor” have a damn thing to do with the stock market anyway).

But, BUT, when the stock market goes through the roof, suddenly nobody mentions Bush and the candy@ssed bedwetting liberal girlie boys come out queefing about how the “poor” don’t get a share of the spoils. Awwwwwweeeeeeee.

Tuff tiddie. This is America. You work, you get paid, and you can do anything you want with that money including buying stocks. Simple as that.

By Redneck Convert

May 5, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

Well, I see the Kansas people got hit with another tornado. I don’t know what it takes for people to get smart. If you move to Minnesota and see that the winters is below zero and the ice stays till it turns blue, time to move some place else. If you are in Kansas and you see tornados one after the other, time to move someplace else.

I like the judge for sentencing this Paris Hilton to jail. He’s for Law and Order, and us rednecks is all for Law and Order. Except maybe when we get arrested. Then we say the cops need something else to do besides hounding decent citizens. Anyway, Law and Order is why we watch Cops all the time on TV. It’s a good redneck show aimed at us GA rednecks. Lots of the action takes place around trailers so we can feel right at home when we see it.

Well, NASCAR is on so me and my buddy Jim Earl will be tied up the rest of the day. I hope you all get the worlds affairs all straightened out and we can start the week fresh. I hope you put a stop to the attacks on Sister Dusty. She will show up at the Church of Holiness in a bad mood tomorrow and will probly rant about Joe Bill again and how he did a No. 1 around the alter when he was drunk a year or so ago.

By Reverend John Mark Karr

May 5, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

Hi Wooten regulars - remember me?

Church life is wonderful, especially my youth ministry.

Recently, a couple of Wooten regulars joined my congregation - Brother/Sister Andi and Sister Markus.

Yes, the Lord doth move in mysterious ways.

We’re all bunking together on our next ‘youth retreat’.

Hallelujah!

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

Well, it appears the disease of liberalism has infiltrated the Jewish community. Zombietime has a good review. Any time you see sickos supporting Carter at Berkley (where the hell else) carrying signs with the word “progressive” on it, you know you are dealing with liberal freaks, just like on this blog.

By Kev

May 5, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

OK item by item: As a LIBERAL I fully 100% agree with the Supreme Court on police using any means necessary to stop fleeing suspects who put us all in danger. And NO, the General Assembly does not need to substitute its judgement for the police officer’s judgement. We pay the police to made decisions and, as far as I am concerned, the police should chase and use whatever force- including gunfire if necessary- to stop fools who choose to run and put all of us in danger. And people do not run from the police over speeding. The run because they have felony warrants, are violating parole, have no license or have drugs in the car. This LIBERAL supports the police 100%! The fool that got crippled deserved it. Maybe he will think twice before he runs again. If the General Assembly wants to do anything, it should make fleeing in a motor vehicle a felony like it is in most other states. Here it is still misdomeanor traffic charges. See “Felony Evading”. Item The 75/575 thing. Let’s see, we want to spend 4 billion dollars to widen 75 to many more lanes between 575 and 285 as I understand it. And then of course we will have a nice big bottleneck at 285/75 every morning. Unless of course we want to widen 75 into the connector and move the bottleneck to downtown. The place to start is downtown. Widen the connector to 30 lanes first. 15 lanes each way with 5 express lanes for traffic not exiting in downtown. Then worry about the suburbs. Also expand MARTA. Run the west line out to Douglasville, east to Conyers, south to Stockbridge, north to Cumming, NW to Kennesaw and NE to Mall of Georgia. Also add commuter rail from downtown to Athens/UGA. Finally buy 1000 new buses and run them in all 16 counties. Item Jon Corzine was stupid. Most liberals are not. It was you conservatives that didn’t want to wear your seatbelts. That is why you buy pickups isn’t it? Item We don’t need larger lot sizes. That is what has got us into the traffic mess we have now. We need much higher density housing in the near suburbs and city with open spaces between projects- much like Chicago has. Don’t forget that in 20 years we will have about 13 million people living here. They have to live somewhere. Item It was LIBERALS that have brought Darfur to the attention of the American people. Cons don’t care about Darfur. No oil there! Item New organizations should publish the names of all offenders. In my hometown, the paper (Wichita Eagle) does and always has under “Daily Record”. Every traffic offense, felony and misdomeaner listed along with all marriages, divorces, bankruptcies and births. As a LIBERAL I think prostitution should be legal. Funny how “moral” people condem sex for money but not marriage for money. They worship Anna Nicole Smith and condem the neighbourhood prostitute.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:24 AM | Link to this

See, Conservatives can infiltrate and punk diseased liberal “protests” and “rallies” just as well as the fleabags on the moonbat left like Mike Stark can do to the Right.

Don’t these liberal demonRAT freaks of human nature have JOBS?

By Kev

May 5, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

BTW whay are comments only allowed until 5PM?? Some of us have to work for a living you know

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

Hey Kev, did you not ever learn what paragraphs are?

PS: You can expand MARTA to Tiajuana if you want liberal, but that doesn’t mean people are going to use it.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this

With budget deficits improving, the government said Wednesday it is discontinuing sales of three-year Treasury notes.

WTF? You mean we all aren’t going to wilt up and die due to the deficit? I thought our children and grandchildren were going to live in famine because of Bush. Now it’s such a non-threat to the future that T-notes are being tossed overboard?

What happened? Reagan’s deficit was high and by the time his economic policies kicked in, it all but evaporated like p!ss in the Sahara. Of course, that was Clintoon’s doing, not of Reagan or Republicans taking over Congress in 1995.

Note (pardon the pun) the lack of mainstream media reporting of this. DAMN sure don’t look for this in the al Jazeera Constipation.

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

No prison could hold Paris for long. She’ll break out, no doubt. “Escape from AllThatJazz” (part duh).

Paris will only need her nine inch Woos and she’ll barter her way out. She can make those with paper mache and hair from the prison barber shop. She’ll need some rubber cement and some raincoats she can get from the shop to make a black cocktail dress. She’ll have to work with other inmates so that one person can primp while the others keep lookout.

I predict Paris will get herself out in six days. Prison Break!!

Now if we can get Nicole Richie to break the law…..

ANd the Olson twins! Lets get them behind bars. Va va voom.

How about the cast of babes on “deal or no deal” (Appeal or no Appeal)? Those models are prime for prison.

Man, this is gonna be great!

Expect many Paris in Prison movies and TV shows, in fact, “This Week with George Stephanopolous” is devoting an entire hour to Paris in Prison. George Wills: “When someone like Paris Hilton sits in prison the congress should enact laws that allow 24 hour real time toilet cams and shower peep holes on the internet. It’s a conservative’s dream to expose liberal pathology and that’s what I propose.” Cokie Roberts: “I have to say that Paris in Prison saved journalism and these roundtable talk shows as much as Regis Philbin saved ABC. I mean, how many times were we going to debate whether there’s a civil war in IRaq? Honestly, if I hear Hannity explain the difference between sectarian strife and ethnic rivalries one more time…..”

Stephanopous: “Is that fair though? Didn’t conservatives call for Monica Lewinski to serve time behind bars, and didn’t that save the Howard Stern show? Where does yellow journalism start and scooping cable end?”

I know, you get the bit…..

By getalife

May 5, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this

Kev,

Welcome to macaca’s (Markus) cage.

There use to be no rules at Mike Luckovich’s blog but the wingnuts went insane and had to place rules upon them.

They are dangerous and should be sent to Gitmo.

Speaking of sex for money

Geez®

By @@

May 5, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this

Jim:

I’ve always had a greater appreciation for the ability to fine tune federal laws at the state level. A welcoming hug or a more aggressive squeeze can only be done up close and personal from the community/state in which you live. The businesses which you invest in? There’s another squeeze that can work in someone’s behalf.

While the situation in Darfur is heart-wrenching. The leftists are always touting that the U.S. with all of its’ military might, cannot be the world’s police, but yet screams for us to take action in Darfur.

At the same time, they point to progressive Europe as a role model which we should follow. The reality is that the EU had done little on the issue of Darfur. The European Union can protray themselves as great advocates of human rights but can’t be relied upon to stand firmly in defense of them. There’s a difference between words and actions.

So where do all the peace activists find Sudan on the map? Somewhere between the towns of “Just” and “Because” they can make the U.S. look impotent on Darfur. I’m not sure they really care that much about the genocide taking place there. They’re all about how WE are committing genocide in Iraq.

But then, I “divest”. I have the means.

I’ve always enjoyed your sarcasm Jim. The Corzine comment was a winner.

As far as publishing the names on the madame’s list. It’s funny to me how the leftists wait with great anticipation for them to be revealed. Yet when the “dirty cigar” shows up in Clinton’s hand-to-mouth…well, that’s just too boring for words.

It looks like CornShucker may be waiting around to either report the “dirty little deeds” or be the first to hear ‘em.

Poppin’ corn today Shucks? Where is PoliForeplay?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this

This has got to be one of the biggest contradictions I’ve ever seen relating to the lie of man-made global warming and Kyoto. First Yahoo! goes into the toilet of liberal hysteria, and now Reuters.

OSLO (Reuters) - Developing nations that are fast industrializing, such as China and India, have braked their rising greenhouse gas emissions by more than the total cuts demanded of rich nations by the U.N.’s Kyoto Protocol.

But then those idiots say this:

“And it is hard to say which Kyoto nations have done most, with deliberate policies, to cut emissions since 1990.”

What the hell? You mean to tell me they can determine that China with all it’s secrecy is doing more than the US to cut carbon emissions but yet can’t tell which Western nation is doing the most cutting? Stunningly laughable.

No, you can’t make this stuff up.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

Corzine’s apology was heart felt.

The wingnuts would blame the liberals and never apologize.

It was great to hear a leader speaking of setting example.

The wingnuts teach their kids to lie, cheat , steal and kill.

That is the example they set.

They belong in Gitmo.

Geez.®

By The Truth Hurts

May 5, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this

So Markus thinks Clintons economic success was all due to Reagan’s policies “kicking in”? What a joke. You must have a pitiful life to spend your Saturday mornings b!tching and moaning about liberals. You even whine about somebody not using paragraphs.

Whiner.

How’s that for a paragraph.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

Well well well. It appears the diseased liberal cage monkey stalker girlie boys have gone after LGF again. This time, they have ID jacked the host (SOUND FAMILIAR???) and used his email accounts to spam all over the place.

I wouldn’t put it past a few of the sick liberal RATs that infest this blog to have done just that to some Conservatives on this blog. Oh wait, they already HAVE.

Liberals - so open-minded they quell dissenting opinion.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this

David Limbaugh: “Increasingly, from the left’s perspective, there is just one acceptable viewpoint.”

Yeah, THEIR viewpoint. Those oh so open minded liberals.

TTH: did you say something queefbag?

By getalife

May 5, 2007 11:02 AM | Link to this

macaca,

This is what I get when I click your link:

Forbidden You don’t have permission to access /weblog/ on this server.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Apache/1.3.37 Server at www.littlegreenfootballs.com Port 80

Charles the coward banned my ip.

He asked for it.

Bwhahahahahaha.

By CornShucks

May 5, 2007 11:05 AM | Link to this

Pairs of Paris sip, sin, and rap, sir.

That’s called a anagram, no a palindrome, no, it’s an axiom, no it’s an umlaut,

Today’s quiz: Why do people never recall the word that not an anagram, but a word that is formed by the first letter of a phrase, like NASA or NASCAR. What is that word? Nobody knows. Not one person has ever been able to remember it, even though they’ve been told a million times.

By Dusty

May 5, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

Kev @10:23

I see you have quite a few points to make (paragraphs would help the reading) and I agree with some of them, but not all.

Conservatives do care about Darfur. Church aid agencies and the UN have been at the front of getting supplies there. My “church” has one of the most renowned aid agencies in the world. Churches (usually considered conservative) have constantly reminded the world of the tragedy of Darfur and sought to help.

But you are wrong about oil in Darfur. It is considered a prime area for the production of oil, as yet undeveloped. In fact, some pundits have suggested the genocide in Darfur is being done by Sudan to clear the area for oil production.

Then there is your suggestion that society worships Anna Nicole Smith and condemns prostitutes.

I know of no one who worshiped Ms.Smith. She seemed like a human novelty that the news media loved. I felt sorry for her. First married to a feeble and dying octogenarian, then “taking up” with every man that appeared in some kind of attempt at love. Then to die from drugs taken to offset the debris of her life. Does not sound like something to admire. I hope her baby has a better life.

I am against legal prostitution. Sounds like paying for the degredation of women for the pleasure of men without morals. And basicly, I believe that it is wrong to have no sexual inhibitions. Paying for sex at someone else’s expense or accepting money to give it smells to high heaven. Sorry, but I feel some rules in life lead to our own mental, physical and character well being.

So there’s my thoughts for today. It is Saturday with much to be done.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this

“So Markus thinks Clintons economic success was all due to Reagan’s policies “kicking in”? What a joke.”

If you can’t read into sarcasm, that’s not my fault. You DID catch my inclusion of Newt’s 1995 Congress as well, did you not toilet stain?

“You must have a pitiful life to spend your Saturday mornings b!tching and moaning about liberals.”

At least I’m man enough to use one ID and I SURE don’t post 7 days a week here, queefbag liberal.

By The Truth Hurts

May 5, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

TTH: did you say something queefbag?

Wow, classy comeback. Nice.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this

How the mainstream media operates:

When Bush is in the White House and Republicans are in control of Congress (ie: 2005), rising gas prices are the fault of Dick Cheney and greedy Halliburton.

When Bush is in the White House and RATs are in control of Congress (ie: 2007), amazingly the REAL reason for rising gas prices is printed.

Funny old world, isn’t it? BTW, has anyone heard any RATs b!tch about rising gas prices lately like the gasbags did ALL FREAKING LAST YEAR???

Me neither.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this

God save America.†

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this

Gitmo, every time I start to think you have an ounce of intelligence “left,” you never fail to prove me wrong. If you can’t figure out a way around being IP banned, you need to find a new retirement hobby. Like checkers.

By TW

May 5, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

Why has Saxby Chambliss not been courted for the presidency? Is he not the picture boy for what the Republican party has become?????? Or is that the problem?

By The Truth Hurts

May 5, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

Remember Jeff Gannon?

Organizers put out 600 folding chairs on the lawn — the spot where presidents are inaugurated — and set up a huge stage with powerful amplifiers. But at 9:30 a.m. yesterday, not one of the 600 seats was occupied. By 11 a.m., as a woman read a passage from Revelations, attendance had grown — to four people. Finally, at 1 p.m., 37 of the 600 seats were occupied, though many of those people were tourists eating lunch.

Where was everybody? “”This isn’t that kind of event,” explained Jeff Gannon, spokesman for the host, the International Bible Reading Association. Gannon, actually a pseudonym for James Guckert, had earned fame in 2005 representing a conservative Web site at White House briefings until it was revealed that he posted nude pictures of himself on the Web to offer his services as a $200-an-hour gay escort.

Let us pray for the power to understand how Gannon made his way from HotMilitaryStud.com to the International Bible Reading Association

You can’t make this stuff up.

I wonder how well he knows Markus.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this

macaca,

I do not care about masking my ip to read the lgf.

I leave it to show how that coward Charles bans those who do not agree with his hatred.

God save America †

No more hate in 08®

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this

Saxby who?

Question answered.

By @@

May 5, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

Aahhh yes CornShucker. Axioms. Euclid’s element.

The hole is greater than the part.

That’s how I see it anyway.

Off to run errands.

By The Truth Hurts

May 5, 2007 11:40 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON — The National Rifle Association is urging the Bush administration to withdraw its support of a bill that would prohibit suspected terrorists from buying firearms. Backed by the Justice Department, the measure would give the attorney general the discretion to block gun sales, licenses or permits to terror suspects.

In a letter this week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill, offered last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., “would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere ‘suspicions’ of a terrorist threat.”

It would really be hard to make this stuff up…………

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

“I leave it to show how that coward Charles bans those who do not agree with his hatred.”

Gitmo, the same thing happens to me every time I attempt to post on RATunderground.com.

If I had a dollar for every time I was banned by “cowardly” web hosts over the past decade and a half or so, I’d be retired just like you right now.

Your idea of “hatred” is somebody saying something you don’t agree with (as your fellow libs constantly remind us). My idea of “hatred” is more in-depth and real, like racism for example. See what happens when you liberals throw around words like “lie” and “hate” so much with little to quantify them with? They become benign after a while.

By The Truth Hurts

May 5, 2007 11:49 AM | Link to this

My idea of “hatred” is more in-depth and real, like racism for example.

Do you mean this kind of republican, conservative recism?

Today CBSNews.com informed its staff via email that they should no longer enable comments on stories about presidential candidate Barack Obama. The reason for the new policy, according to the email, is that stories about Obama have been attracting too many racist comments.

“It’s very simple,” Mike Sims, director of News and Operations for CBSNews.com, told me. “We have our Rules of Engagement. They prohibit personal attacks, especially racist attacks. Stories about Obama have been problematic, and we won’t tolerate it.”

CBSNews.com does sometimes delete comments on an individual basis, but Sims said that was not sufficient in the case of Obama stories due to “the volume and the persistence” of the objectionable comments.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

You mean Bush is going to do something the NRA disagrees with? Where the hell have I been? All this time according to the horseassed left Bush was in bed with the NRA. Oh well, as long as I’ve got my guns, bows, and crossbows, I could not care less what the NRA thinks… I’m not even a member.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

Yes “TTH,” that is what I’m talking about. Obama had to have early Secret Service detail probably because of that. I’m also talking about THIS kind of racism.

As much as you probably don’t want to admit or even acknowledge it, there are racists of all colors in this nation TTH.

By Whachoo talkinbout racist?

May 5, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

Within days of the piece’s publication, the good reverend found herself under fire from her black peers: I get all these anonymous, threatening calls from folks, saying that they’re going to come after me, I’m a race traitor. They’re not being nice, they’re throwing racial epithets, saying the n-word, [asking] ‘What kind of black person am I?’ All sorts of homophobic epithets. Monroe originally found herself assaulted by over 50 calls a day.

Racism — An equal opportunity employer.

By Reverend Monroe

May 5, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

All because I spoke out against Barack Obama.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

Exhibit A:

Liberal cage monkeys jump up and down over “evolution” as a major player in the Presidential race.

Exhibit B:

Liberal cage monkeys jump up and down over Global Walarmist Reverend Alsore’s quoting of Genesis and commenting on Creationism in a GW slideshow presentation.

No, you REALLY can’t make this stuff up.

Liberals.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 12:16 PM | Link to this

“Racism — An equal opportunity employer.”

You can say that again jack. I hear the “N” word all the time on the Chappelle repeats.

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this

{{{By jbmlaw May 5, 2007 9:40 AM Dear Pillowbiter, lighten up, Cornshucks is pretty funny. We need more humor in the world.}}}

jbmlaw: You really should consider what you’re dealing with here, an antisocial sniveling little Coward that sits around dreaming about other men licking his “nether region:”

{{{By Sailor May 5, 2007 9:56 AM The Sailor said Andi, you’re a fine girl… Andi tortured me last night.}}}

I’m sure you could get some giggles out of this weird mofo but, believe me, you damn sure wouldn’t want to know what they were about.

At least I would hope you wouldn’t.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

(Hey Polly, define yourself. Insult me by calling me a f*-got, do it all day long. Drag Jeff Gannon around behind you, make fun of him being a homosexual, discriminate against him, let all the world know how much you liberals really hate gays, even though you pander for their votes.

Define yourself, loser.)

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 12:24 PM | Link to this

{{{Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani said in Iowa on Friday that President Bush’s response to terrorism will ensure his legacy is that of “a great president.”}}}

Trying to capture some of that Bush magic, hehehe.

They’ll all be crawling back before long.

Winning a war does that for your legacy.

Repent before it’s too late, gitmo!

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Rieckhoff

May 5, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

For those of you who can’t keep track of all the different ways returning troops are getting the run-around, here’s a quick recap of what we saw in 2005:

So what happens to the people responsible for this fiasco? Are they fired, or even reprimanded? No — they are rewarded with handsome bonuses that draw millions of dollars away from crucial VA programs.

What else could the VA have done with $3 million? Here’s an idea. The entire 2006 budget for the Defense and Veterans Traumatic Brain Injury Center was only $14 million dollars. And last year, they faced a staggering budget cut of 50%. Three million dollars would have gone a long way to helping the estimated 150,000 troops with a brain injury. Instead, it went into the pockets of some bureaucrats.

Stories like this show why it’s so important that we work together to make sure our troops and veterans get the care and respect they have earned.

http://www.iava.org/index.php

By @@

May 5, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

Hey CornShucker, I thought I’d wait around for you to call me a lesbo in response to my 11:39. It would have revealed your hypocrisy, and been wrong at the same time.

You have a difficult time grasping euphemisms.

You just don’t get it Polly.

I predict you never will.

By bon scott

May 5, 2007 12:32 PM | Link to this

Good afternoon, Dusty.

But you are wrong about oil in Darfur. It is considered a prime area for the production of oil, as yet undeveloped. In fact, some pundits have suggested the genocide in Darfur is being done by Sudan to clear the area for oil production.

You may want to sit down before you read this, but I totally, without reservations, agree with you. Eastern Asia, most conspicously China, has (for example) a vested interest in Sudan’s newly discovered oil reserves. They’ve been happy to ignore the Darfur genocide, lest it theraten the very lucrative Sudanese oil for Beijing weapons deals.

There’s a lot of very gory and brutak hanky-panky going on in Sudan, but this is among the worst. The Arab-Sudanese leadership in Khartoum is happily trading oil for rifles, APC’s, tanks and even planes to arm not only the Sudanese Army, but the renegade janjaweed Arab-Muslim militas as well, as they try to wipe out the nomadic African-Arabs who call Darfur home.

And no one (outside of, maybe U2s Bono) gives a rats tail. It’s shameful and disgusting.

By Pesos Amigo

May 5, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this

Happy Cinqo but hold the d’Mayo!

Si, Senor! (umlaut implied, or is it accent grave, dammit, I always get my diacriticals mixed up)

Ze Pareesh Heelton eez andelez, non? Pareez eez uno hot tamale, non?

Pareez!

Pareez!

PAREEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!

By Markus

May 5, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

“There use to be no rules at Mike Luckovich’s blog but the wingnuts went insane and had to place rules upon them. They are dangerous and should be sent to Gitmo.”

Let the record reflect gitmo’s 10:44am post is so open-minded of diseased liberalism that we Conservatives should not only be jailed, but sent to a torture chamber.

Those OH so open-minded, tolerant, peaceful, and diverse liberals amongst us.

By Dorkus McGee

May 5, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Ever notice how much an ultrasound picture of a fetus looks like a Dopplar Radar image of a storm? That’s why the most common question that expectant mothers ask their radiologist is, “Is that a tornado or a penis?”

By getalife

May 5, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

macaca,

Why do you think the NRA wants to keep their guns when they are labeled terrorists?

You see, all the freedoms they are taking away can be used against you wingnuts when the Dems take total power in 08.

They are domestic terrorists.

Karma, ain’t it a beach?

By @@

May 5, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Try to contain your obsession CornShucker a/k/a/ PoliFore a/k/a/ Pesos Amigo.

Get a grasp.

Get a clue.

Get a girlfriend/companion.

By Buy Danish

May 5, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

Bonnie Scott,

I’m perplexed by your views. You constantly complain that I portray Islamists in a bad light and pooh pooh the threat they pose to the civilized world, yet you have no problem recommending that we go after them in Darfur.

You have repeatedly stated your belief that Iraq is nothing but a civil war amongst tribes, and as such we should not be involved, but you are recommending that we interfere in what can easily be called a Civil War in the Sudan.

Al Qaeda is involved in both Darfur and in Iraq, but you want to to pack up and leave Iraq and redeploy to the Sudan.

I agree that in addition to the obvious humanitarian interests, there are oil interests at stake in the Sudan, and I believe that it is in the interest of the free world to intervene there.

However, I would ask that countries who have refused to assist militarily in Iraq - like the French or Canadians - should commit their armies to Darfur as we are kind of busy right now.

By Morbo

May 5, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

Head Start is up for reauthorization. Republicans tried to add an obnoxious “faith-based” amendment to the bill. This measure would have allowed Head Start providers to discriminate on the basis of religion when hiring staff or approving volunteers.

Here’s why this is so appalling: Head Start is in no way, shape or form a religious program. It can’t be. Head Start provides a variety of services to low-income children and their families. It is taxpayer funded. The only connection it has with houses of worship is that it sometimes rents space from them. This is purely a matter of convenience. The church provides space, but it does not run the program.

Republicans pushed this measure, but Democrats stopped it. On a procedural vote called a motion to recommit, the amendment went down 222-195.

Had the Republicans prevailed and this measure became law, a church that rented space to a Head Start program could have told a Jewish parent volunteer, “We’re sorry, this is a Christian Head Start. And even though your child is enrolled here, we don’t want your services. There is the door.” That’s the Republican understanding of “religious freedom.”

The Democrats’ view is this: “faith-based” groups are welcome to participate, but they have to play by the same rules as everyone else. We don’t discriminate against people based on what they believe (or do not believe) about God in a public program.

The most satisfying thing about the Head Start vote is that it may signal a new era in how Congress deals with “faith-based” initiatives across the board. Under the GOP, discriminatory amendments like this sailed through the House time and time again. They never got through the Senate, but they were tearing through the House.

It looks like the Democrats aren’t interested in furthering religious discrimination in taxpayer-supported, secular programs. Good.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

I want to keep my guns gitmo, so does that make me a terrorist even though I have no terrorist thoughts of destroying this nation? Are you hatemongers of dissent on the jackaled left going to take away the right to defend oneself too? Are you going to ban compound bows and crossbows next? Where does the buck stop in freedom with you diseased liberal cage demonRATs, gitmo? Obviously it already stops with the buck stopping being dropped. Poofs.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

Busy? Yes, stuck w’s illegal Iraq occupation.

We are begging Syria and Iran for help.

You are right like Ron Paul. We should not be playing the world police, we have own major problems.

We can’t even provide money to rebuild the levees in New Orleans.

God save America †

By getalife

May 5, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

Your party’s hatred makes you a domestic terrorist.

No more hate in 08®

You should careful putting your hatred of others on a public forum.

You could up in Gitmo.

By Andi's Cho Moment

May 5, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

When Andi finally gets the stones to use her guns, Luckovich and Wooten will have a helluva story reprinting all her crazee posts.

Shouldn’t be long now… Jim better hope they don’t lay him off beforehand.

Just kidding - we all know I am talking about one of the biggest cowards in all of Marietta, indeed all of Georgia, perhaps in the whole lily-livered south.

It’ll never happen.

By Bo

May 5, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this

As the jbmlaw informed us this week week, columnist Thomas Sowell believes America is in such bad shape that a military coup might be needed to set things right.

There has always been in the conservative movement a faction that admires fascism. “Mainstream” right wingers — if there is such a thing any more — accuse anyone who points this out of being an extremist, hysterical, outrageous, etc. Yet the existence of this faction is undeniable.

To be clear, I am not saying this is a majority opinion or even common among American conservatives. Nor am I saying that these people admire Hitler or Mussolini. But I do think that the idea of absolute rule by a right-wing strongman appeals to this faction.

The strongman promises law and order, an embrace of “traditional values” (usually through some type of state-sponsored church, established either by law or de facto), glorification of the armed forces and a crackdown on dissent. Add in puppet courts and a rubber-stamp legislative body and you’ve got the whole package.

You can see why this would attract some on the right.

After all, with our current system of government, they are forced to pick up newspapers and see liberals attacking their views in columns and through letters. Furthermore, some liberals write books explaining their ideas that people are free to buy. Sometimes these liberals even appear on television or on the radio. Some have websites. Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to shut all of this down? Aren’t free elections overrated, after all? People are quite capable of voting for the “wrong” candidate.

I realize we’re talking about Sowell, jbmlaw, Dusty/Van, Markus/@@/WootenDull/BuyDanish here, but even dim persons, such as these, should be able to pick up a book and see that military juntas are a poor form of government. But Sowell and his followers apparently do not know this. Scary.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this

“We can’t even provide money to rebuild the levees in New Orleans.”

Yeah man, those $2,000 debit cards that went to buying booze and Fendi bags and mindless FEMA check writing to “claimants” faster than creamed corn through a goose so Bush wouldn’t be called a racist was just a drop in the bucket.

BUT IT’S BUSH’S FAULT FOLKS!!!

Stupid liberal demonRATs. Unaccountability for regional and local corruption and incompetence. I’m WAY over the b!tching.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this

Oops,

Your party’s hatred makes you a domestic terrorist.

No more hate in 08®

You should be careful spewing your hatred of others on a public forum.

You could end up in Gitmo.

Geez®

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:17 PM | Link to this

“You should be careful spewing your hatred of others on a public forum.”

Show me the monkey gitmo. Show me my “hatred” on this blog. Does my dissenting opinion mean I “hate” in your little liberal crystal ball world of liberalism? Please educate me, oh wise retired one.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

He “Bo,” I hate to rain on your little liberal girlie parade here, but it is NOT Conservatives that get out in the streets in masses and protest with anarchist thoughts and get arrested and shot with rubber bullets.

Here, these are YOUR people. You own them. They are YOURS, as gitmo would say.

And then we have the cultist liberal freaks of man-made global warming. But that’s another post. Freaks.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 1:23 PM | Link to this

Every post you spew shows your Cho like hatred.

Good luck at Gitmo.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this

Hey “Bo,” did you read my link to a column about you “open minded liberals” earlier? If not, I’ll post it again.

Words are cheap, and you liberals plunder them like a $5 crack w*******.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:30 PM | Link to this

“Every post you spew shows your Cho like hatred.”

Mmm-huh. That’s what I thought. Just like a good little liberal thought control nazi, gitmo can’t REALLY define his own words with examples.

Liberals and emotions.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this

“Every post you spew shows your Cho like hatred.”

Mmm-huh. That’s what I thought. Just like a good little liberal thought control nazi, gitmo can’t REALLY define his own words with examples.

Liberals and emotions. So much for freedom of speech like these libs tout so much. And I thought BUSH was taking away my freedoms according to these sickos on the wacky left. Man.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this

Really?

What about the LSU student threatening Hillary?

What about Cho, Rudolph, Waco,etc…

Why does Obama need secret service protection?

Wingnuts are domestic terrorists and belong in Gitmo.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this

What about pie throwing gitmo? What about your hero">http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/10/breaking-virginia-gop-senator-george.html”>hero liberal FREAK Mike Stark going postal at a George Allen event? What about your environazi cultist FREAKS that burn down new homes and torch SUV dealerships gitmo? What about pie throwings in Conservatives faces gitmo?

We could do this crapola all day long gitmo.

By Buy Danish

May 5, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

{{{After all, with our current system of government, they are forced to pick up newspapers and see liberals attacking their views in columns and through letters. Furthermore, some liberals write books explaining their ideas that people are free to buy. Sometimes these liberals even appear on television or on the radio. Some have websites. Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to shut all of this down? Aren’t free elections overrated, after all? People are quite capable of voting for the “wrong” candidate.}}}

Bo,

I am not familiar with Thomas Sowell’s column, and have not commented on it. I will try to find it now. Meanwhile, please do not assume things you have no way of knowing.

Finally, it is the Left that is constantly trying (and often succeeding) in censoring speech and opposing views, so if you think that defines a fascist mentality, you may want to take a good look in the mirror.

Who do you think got Don Imus off the air? Who is it that censors conservative speech at college campuses? Who is it that is trying to pass “hate crime”, err, Stalinist thought crime legislation? Who is it that is trying to reimpose the “Fairness Doctrine” because they can’t deal with the free market? Who is it that won’t even appear on Fox News to participate in a Presidential debate? Isn’t that a form of censorship?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this

Dammit. Mike Stark FREAKOUT link again.

Oh yeah gitmo, we won’t EVEN go into the death threats on Bush and Cheney and other Republicans by your fellow sickos on the left. How about that PETA “got cancer” commercial about Guliani and his prostate cancer and him saying he drinks milk? You really are a pathetic hypocritical liberal demoncat.

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this

{{{By Andi’s Cho Moment May 5, 2007 1:08 PM When Andi finally gets the stones to use her guns, Luckovich and Wooten will have a helluva story reprinting all her crazee posts.}}}

Actually, I think it would be more appropriate to say that when ever you gather enough courage to come by the house and try to silence me, I will be sure to take advantage of the opportunity to see if my 44 magnum really is the “most powerful handgun in the world and will blow your head clean off.”

Until then, I’ll just let you stew in your stupid mindless rage about me, all day, everyday, obsessed and obviously insane.

Enjoy yourself, loser.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this

Mike Stark did not go postal, he asked a question. Allen’s handlers went postal and he is history.

Bwa.

Check out his blog:

Calling all wingnuts

Good stuff.

By Midori

May 5, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this

ROFL!!

Pie throwing and drinking milk is now equivalent to threatening someone’s life???

bwahahahahahaha

oh, those wacky conservative standards!!!

And I can’t believe that after all this time, wingnuts are STILL obsessed with the poor being issued $2000 debit cards.

Pitiful. Just pitiful.

Who needs levees when the flood victims got $2000 tax free? What logic!!

I just wanted to stop by and post this, however, I didn’t imagine I would experience such astoundingly awesome comic relief.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this

This is Mike Stark, wingnut queen that gitmo adores. Oh yeah, and gitmo is not a liberal or a wingnut and I’ve got a 1963 split window Stingray for sale for $80,000.

By Midori

May 5, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this

Who do you think got Don Imus off the air?

um, his sponsors?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this

Wrong as usual gitmo. I knew you would say that. What the punk is not telling you is that he FORCED his way into an area he was not allowed. There are ALWAYS two sides to every story.

Check out the pics.

No wonder you want OUR views and thought expressions censored gitmo, you little liberal nazi wannabe.

“Midori” for the record if you want ME to bring up DEATH THREATS ON REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES by your fellow sicko leftists, I’ll be more than happy to do so. First I’ll start with some deleted muffingtonqueefpost.com blogs and then I’ll work my way up to RATunderground.com.

Just let me know you want some of this, you dirty hypocritical liberal RAT.

By Buy Danish

May 5, 2007 2:04 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Were Sharpton, Jackson and Media Matters sponsors of the Imus Show?

The censorship and intimidation of conservatives that occurs on college campuses involves a lot more than “pie throwing”. It ranges from assualt, to death threats, to often successful attemps to shut down conservative groups.

I don’t think that Ruth Malhotra thinks it is as amusing as you do.

By Seriously Jim

May 5, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

Any reputable mental health professional would tell you that you and Luckovich have a couple of regular over-posters that may be considered a significant danger to themselves and others.

What is your and/or the AJC’s responsibility if and when something happens?

As the VT shootings show us, untreated mental illness, especially in paranoid people with sexual identity issues, can be a very serious thing…

By Markus

May 5, 2007 2:11 PM | Link to this

Gee Buy Danish, another liberal threat at Georgia Tech on Conservative thought. Why am I not surprised by those “peaceful” and “tolerant” and “open-minded” liberals amongst us?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this

That 2:08 post is a liberal expressing his/her opinion of freedom of speech. First, they want no government intrusion by Bush on private lives, then they have no problems with private intrusion based solely on comments they don’t agree with because they can’t actually define what threats they are referring to.

Liberals.

Got any response to my 1:57 yet gitmo? Didn’t think so.

By Buy Danish

May 5, 2007 2:16 PM | Link to this

Marcus,

What is even more shocking is the refusal of Georgia Tech’s administration to do anything about it.

I don’t know whether the Virginia Tech massacre has been enough for them to rethink their disgraceful ambivalence.

By Hmmmmm it's a revelation

May 5, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this

Looking at the GOP candidates in the MSNBC link I see a wide spectrum of ideals. Diversity if you will.

When I look at the dem candidates I see the predominance of one brain. The George Soros brain to be exact with his anti-american revolution. Down with capitalism and up with socialism.

That’s why you keep hearing the same repetitive arguments from the leftwingers. Their brains don’t function. They’re looping off of their anti-america leader.

What was it Soros said? MoveOn bought and paid for the dems. They’re obligated to do my bidding.

By Buy Danish

May 5, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this

There is some good news on the fight to end censorship and indoctrination on college campuses.

After months of public pressure, Michigan State University (MSU) has ended its controversial Student Accountability in Community (SAC) program. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) urged MSU to end the SAC program because it forced students whose speech or behavior was deemed unacceptable to undergo ideological reeducation, or else face effective expulsion.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

BD, I find it quite amusing how the sick left on this blog continues to use “threats” and “hate speech” to quell dissenting opinion when the jackasses can’t even DEFINE them with an example. BTW, GT is overrun by liberals. Two of my friends got their MSEEs from there and they couldn’t wait to get the hell out.

Anyway, I’ve asked our sick liberals here no less than four times today to define hate and threats and get this response:

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

chirp

By Buy Danish

May 5, 2007 2:30 PM | Link to this

More good news in the fight against censorship of conservatives on college campuses.

PROVIDENCE, R.I., April 26, 2007—In a meeting last night, the Student Senate of the University of Rhode Island (URI) voted against a proposal to derecognize the College Republicans, holding that the group need not apologize for advertising a satirical white, heterosexual, American male “scholarship.” This decision overturns last week’s Student Senate committee vote to revoke the College Republicans’ official recognition after they refused to apologize for advertising the “scholarship.”

By For the Record ...

May 5, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this

Imagine what the world will be like if this country elects a President who doesn’t believe in the theory of evolution:

Huckabee Brownback Tancredo

Bloggers, raise your hand if you don’t believe in the theory of evolution.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

10:07 post by one of our resident liberal ID poofers:

======================================= By Sailor May 5, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

The only problem with last night is that Andi brought her galpal Bi Danish along.

Look at that fat ugly cow (bull?) for more than a few seconds and you’ll puke.

2:08 post from one of our resident liberal ID poofers:

By Seriously Jim May 5, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

Any reputable mental health professional would tell you that you and Luckovich have a couple of regular over-posters that may be considered a significant danger to themselves and others.

What is your and/or the AJC’s responsibility if and when something happens?

Now hopefully people will understand what I mean when I say liberalism is a disease. Poof.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this

What is up with the blog format and characters? Let’s try this AGAIN.

10:07 post by one of our resident liberal ID poofers:

By Sailor May 5, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

The only problem with last night is that Andi brought her galpal Bi Danish along.

Look at that fat ugly cow (bull?) for more than a few seconds and you’ll puke.

So I shut my eyes while Andi worked her mad skills…

A 2:08 post from one of our resident liberal ID poofers:

By Seriously Jim May 5, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

Any reputable mental health professional would tell you that you and Luckovich have a couple of regular over-posters that may be considered a significant danger to themselves and others.

What is your and/or the AJC’s responsibility if and when something happens?

As the VT shootings show us, untreated mental illness, especially in paranoid people with sexual identity issues, can be a very serious thing…

Now hopefully people will understand what I mean when I say liberalism is a disease. Poof.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this

For the record…

Check out my 12:14 about evolution.

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this

{{{In the heady opening weeks of the 110th Congress, the Democrats’ domestic agenda appeared to be flying through the Capitol: Homeland security upgrades, a higher minimum wage and student loan interest rate cuts all passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. But now that initial progress has foundered as Washington policymakers have been consumed with the debate over the Iraq war. Not a single priority on the Democrats’ agenda has been enacted, and some in the party are growing nervous that the “do nothing” tag they slapped on Republicans last year could come back to haunt them. The Senate struck out on its own, with a broad overhaul of the rules on lobbying Congress. Not one of those bills has been signed into law.}}}

Plus, they just got punked by the Bush Master on the Iraq spending bill.

America is finding out who you are, pinko, a noisy bunch of do nothings.

I agree 100% with you that Alberto Gonzales is a dud; but he sure is schooling your as-ses, the more hysterical you get, the calmer he gets.

You libs are a case history in how not to run government, show trials and witch hunts do not a legislature make. Future generations will study you to learn what not to do.

Pitiful.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

(Did this post upset you Polly? Did it make you see red, foam at the mouth, rage at the world? Does it make you feel like calling me a f-a-g-got? Isn’t that just too f’ing bad?)

By Oh the Humanity

May 5, 2007 2:58 PM | Link to this

NEWSWEEK POLL HAS BUSH APPROVAL RATING AT 28% !!!!!!!!!!

WORST RATING FOR ANY PRESIDENT IN THAT POLL’S HISTORY !!!

Oh the humanity. Oh the humanity.

By Cornshucks

May 5, 2007 2:58 PM | Link to this

You say you’re doubtin’ evolution, well, you know…we all want to shape our heads….you say it’s revolution, well, you know….you better pee on dull instead-hehed….but when you go carrying on with hate on blogs…you aint gonna make it with anyone anyhow…and you know you’re gonna love…08….08….08…..

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

By Seriously Jim

May 5, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this

If I were you, which thankfully I’m not, I wouldn’t let Andi or Markus post unless they had taken their anti-psychotics.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this

“Reponse, yea I have a response.

Um, what?”

28% is bad but Olmert has a 0%.

Both are failures.

Geez®

By For the Record ...

May 5, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this

Markus, I am not sure what point you are making with your links about evolution and the GOP candidates who don’t believe in it. But then again, I know you and Andy can be real intellectual snobs with your post-modern approach to intelligent debate (post a link apropos of nothing, then call your opponents a name.)

How is this for clarity: if you believe Adam and Eve were plopped down on Earth 10,000 years ago by a hairy, thunderous, anthropomorphic God, despite all the science to the countrary, then you are not smart enough to haul garbage, much less be President of the United States.

(no links necessary)

By getalife

May 5, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

Wingnuts like Rush and Boortz blaming liberals for the Cho massacre says it all.

Idiots like macaca believe them like good little cultists.

Then folks like Dusty blame the Tillman family for wanting the truth.

Nuff said.

By Seriously Jim

May 5, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this

Bi Danish, that GT situation is troubling.

You personally needn’t worry about ever being raped, though. Rape is an act of rage, not disgust.

By Darth Vader

May 5, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this

Markus is Buy Danish’s husband’s gay lover. I saw it with my own eyes.

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this

{{{What that has effectively meant is that the majority of French are bought off with a lavish welfare state and jobs on the public payroll, financed by a minority who pay high taxes for the privilege of living in France. That deal, however, is almost completely broken. Business has had enough of bankrolling bureaucracy and funding feather-bedding. Well-known French individuals, such as the popular singer and actor Johnny Hallyday, have sundered their ties with the country and gone to live abroad because of the penal wealth tax, which led to Hallyday complaining that he now has to send two thirds of his annual income to the French treasury.}}}

Right at the same time the sniveling Coward liberals in America want to raise taxes.

So out of touch, so senile, so naive.

We need another election soon, watch how the Frenchie one turns out tomorrow.

The wingnut will be installed at the top.

Like it should be.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 3:39 PM | Link to this

“I wouldn’t let Andi or Markus post unless they had taken their anti-psychotics.”

Exhibit #1241 of the open mindedness of liberalism. These sick liberal cage monkeys know they’ve got no game on us, so they want us shut up.

How liberally quaint.

By Jigsaw

May 5, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this

The reason Buy Danish doesn’t like getalife is because he stole her husband away. After that took place, Mr.Danish and getalife met Markus online, which lead to Mr.Danish discovering that Markus gives better head than getalife and the rest is history.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this

“Markus, I am not sure what point you are making with your links about evolution and the GOP candidates who don’t believe in it.”

Hey For the Berger stolen record…

Go back and re-read my post and you’ll see it has more than one link. One is a wingnut link inspired by gitmo, the other is a link inspired by a wingnut who kisses Al Sore @ss until the Sorebot mentions Genesis and Creationism.

For the record, I believe both Creationism and Evolution can be the truth.

By @@

May 5, 2007 3:45 PM | Link to this

OMG, I love this cartoon.

Granted, they may be loose on some of the GOP candidates, but they’ll grow into ‘em. Conservatives will see to that.

The Democratic candidates? No way no how. Little pinkos errrr “pinkies” errrr “socialists” could never fill the boots of someone so opposed to communism.

Pinkos…I’ve never used it, but it was fun.

What is it you always say Andy?

“God love him”.

Circle the Republican wagons. We can do it again in ‘08.

Out to do yardwork.

By Jigsaw

May 5, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this

Funny how @@ and Buy Danish always have announce their departure. These two individuals are uncomfortably similar.

Let the game begin.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this

By Darth Vader May 5, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this

Markus is Buy Danish’s husband’s gay lover. I saw it with my own eyes.

And these liberal queefbags that infest this blog had the gall to post THIS:

By Seriously Jim May 5, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

As the VT shootings show us, untreated mental illness, especially in paranoid people with sexual identity issues, can be a very serious thing…

Just sit back and watch the hypocritical liberal cage monkey scratching and sniffing. Always entertaining.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this

By Seriously Jim May 5, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this

Bi Danish, that GT situation is troubling.

You personally needn’t worry about ever being raped, though. Rape is an act of rage, not disgust.

Let the record show that liberal ID poofer “Seriously Jim” has “disgust” for those that don’t agree with him/her and could potentially be a threat to society.

This is fun.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 3:55 PM | Link to this

Darth Vader,

Stop following me around or I’ll call the police. What I do in my spare time, which evidently is every Saturday, is none of your business. Buy Danish and I have an understanding so get lost.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this

“What do you dislike the most about America?”

The media and liberal demoncats. Oops, one and the same, MY BAD.

Note how the Party Of The Permanently Miserable representatives in the media can’t even ask positive questions?

Only a losing party can win on being negative.

Bush poll numbers low? BFD. I didn’t know he was running again. Carter’s was 28% yet he was one of the best presidents in US history according to diseased liberal cage monkeys.

Oh yeah, and no word by those “pollsters” if Bush’s low poll numbers are because he has NOT been acting like a Conservative Republican that he played himself out to be in 2000.

Zombies.

By @@

May 5, 2007 4:03 PM | Link to this

Jigsaw:

What is it with you leftists and your disdain for acts of courtesy?

It’s an effort to let you know I won’t be around to receive or respond to your comments.

You’re welcome to post into thin air, but I think you’d be better off directing your posts to your liberal friends here if that’s your objective.

I haven’t seen anything much exude from between their ears here in the last two days. I think the evolutionists refer to it as the “outgassing” process.

Knock yourself out….I won’t be here to read it.

Better?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:05 PM | Link to this

ID jack 3:55.

When liberals can’t debate or deal with what their ideologue opposites post, they menstruate all over this blog and ID jack. Sickasses. Every last one of the cage monkey experiments of God.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this

I like this one

Down with the king.

Geez®

By Jigsaw

May 5, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this

@@,

I want to play a game.

Just like Buy Danish you say you’re leaving but you really don’t.You stay in front of the computer waiting for the right moment to strike.

Yard work on a cool windy day, yeah right! It’s ok, you can admit you don’t have a life. The sooner that you are honest about that the sooner your mind will be free.

Let the game begin.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this

I guess gitmo didn’t want any of my 1:57 post. Liberal beatdown #997.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Don’t you wish your boyfriend was hot like me? Don’t you wish your boyfriend was a freak like me? Don’t you?

By getalife

May 5, 2007 4:11 PM | Link to this

What is stopping w from having a 0% approval rating like Olmert?

The wingnuts brainwashed by the corporate media of course.

God save America †

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:15 PM | Link to this

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OTLSUG0&show_article=1

Don’t think for one second the disease of liberalism infesting this nation would eventually root for these same “rights.”

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:18 PM | Link to this

Liberal demonRAT ID poofqueef, don’t you just HATE it when you post at the EXACT same time as I do? What’s up PollyParrot, don’t have anything of real value to contribute here? That’s what I thought.

Would you listen to that? The sound of a jackal coming out of a JACKASS.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Let’s let bygones be bygones. If I suck your c*ck will you become republican?

By getalife

May 5, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this

Markus,

Ok, but watch the teeth this time. I don’t know if I can handle beng a republican because being gay has its advantages in the democratic party. What do you think?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:31 PM | Link to this

Senator Feinstein, the American people deserve the truth. And the TRUTH will always come through tribulation. Unless of course, classified documents are stolen and destroyed.

By Darth Vader

May 5, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this

I think both you perverts need to get off this blog and get a freaking room!!

By getalife

May 5, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this

Stop wanking Andy.

Check these toons out @@

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:37 PM | Link to this

Whatever you want baby, I can see us now:

Markus and getalie sittin’ in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g. First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes getalife pushing the baby carriage.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:42 PM | Link to this

“a href=”http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/05/03/entertainment/e154216D21.DTL”>Poor little perky cute liberal demonRAT Katie Couric is just tanking faster than an M1 dropped from a C-17.

I am tempted to say she should quit her Bush bashing and blatant liberal neoStalinist RAT bias and just get another live televised colonoscopy to boost ratings, but even I can’t stoop to the levels of the sick liberals here.

Paper circulation in the toilet, and broadcast media as well as PMSNBC ratings in the toilet. Gee, I wonder why?

By MB

May 5, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this

The Washington Post had a front-page item today on congressional Dems finding their legislative agenda stalled. The House has passed a variety of key pieces of legislation, but a combination of Republican obstructionism, presidential vetoes, and attention to the war in Iraq has slowed down progress. A variety of Dems quoted in the piece agree that they want to do much more to cross items of their to-do list this year.

But the piece also included a quote from former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta, who’s been increasingly critical of the congressional Dems.

“The primary message coming out of the November election was that the American people are sick and tired of the fighting and the gridlock, and they want both the president and Congress to start governing the country…It just seems to me the Democrats, if they fail for whatever reason to get a domestic agenda enacted … will pay a price.”

There may be a kernel of truth in Panetta’s comments about the need to pass a domestic agenda. I don’t doubt, for example, that Dems will be justifiably slammed if they fail to put a minimum wage increase on the president’s desk before the end of the year.

But the rest of the quote seems oddly detached from recent events. Why would the message of the midterm elections be disgust over “gridlock”? There was NO gridlock. Before November, Republicans controlled everything and passed what they wanted to pass. Americans couldn’t have gotten tired of DC stalemates — there were none.

If anything, the elections should be interpreted in the exact opposite way. Americans saw the results of a Republican Congress acceding to the demands of a Republican White House, and said, “We’ve had enough.” For that matter, if polling data means anything, the electorate overwhelmingly decided that the Democrats’ agenda is preferable to the GOP’s, on matter of domestic and foreign policy.

Panetta seems to believe Democrats should be less forceful in advancing a popular policy agenda endorsed by voters, moving closer to Bush in order to “start governing.” This doesn’t make any sense.

Voters are “sick and tired of the fighting”? That’s a rather clichéd sound bite, but more importantly, it’s also unsupported by the facts. In a recent Pew Forum poll, which asked respondents, “Do you think Democratic leaders in Congress are going too far or not far enough in challenging George W. Bush’s policies in Iraq, or are they handling this about right?”

A plurality (40%) said Dems should do more to challenge the president, while 30% said the Dems’ efforts are “about right.” Only 23% said Dems are going too far.

So 70% say that Dems are being appropriately or even insufficiently aggressive in challenging Bush. Multiple polls show that solid majorities back Dem efforts to end the war — efforts which by nature are confrontational and, yes, basically partisan, thanks to the GOP’s backing of Bush. What’s more, multiple polls have also found that solid majorities support Dem efforts to probe the GOP’s malfeasance in general — also efforts which by nature are confrontational and partisan.

In addition, the Post article’s central premise — that the Dems aren’t legislating enough — is itself flawed. After three months, the 110th Congress has already passed more bills, held more hearings, called more roll-call votes, been in session more days, and seen more laws enacted than the same time period of the previous non-election year under Republicans. Good job gang.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this

Here are a list of some criminal wingnuts responsible for the illegal occupation

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this

Ah dammit, another jacked up link.

Cute little liberal perky Katie going down in flames again.

Blog representative liberal democrat ID poofer: are you getting bored yet?

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:49 PM | Link to this

getalife,

I know we don’t see eye to eye when it comes to politics, but I still love you. You know I’ll do anything for your love. Please tell me you love me!

By Dusty

May 5, 2007 4:51 PM | Link to this

BonScott @12:32

Yes, we do disagree on politics but I don’t think any of us want to see the seemingly planned genocide in Darfur. Most people are concerned over the killing of 200,000 people with that many more displaced. I am afraid we are heading for something like Rwanda and the 800,000 murdered there in 1994. Mass starvation seems likely also.

I was not aware of the involvement with China as the driving force for oil. Not too surprising but I shall read more about that.

The African Union troops seem hopeful at the moment but their resources are meager. Also the restrictions placed on their actions renders them almost useless.

Buy Danish is quite right in saying that we are busy fighting against our own terroristic foes.

We, as in USA, do use diplomacy and encourage treaties. But the reliability of the Sudanese government is like shifiting sand.

So we are back where we started. What can be done versus how can we let genocide continue. I wish I knew some great answers but I don’t. This would be a fine time for the UN to react strongly with action. That won’t happen either.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:53 PM | Link to this

HEY! WTF is up with the the RAT pack diverting future funding for terrorist intel gathering to the LIE of man-made global

© walarmism

Don’t these JACKASSES constantly b!tch about Bush allegedly not going after Osama? WHAT EFFIN’ POSERS.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this

If you don’t tell me you love me, I’m going to smear the dild@ you bought me with transmission fluid and shove it down my throat!

By Markus

May 5, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this

Nice post MB. Now, exactly what has Pelosi & Co. mentioned lately about getting Osama and lowering our fuel prices like they have promised for the last two years?

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 4:58 PM | Link to this

{{{By MB May 5, 2007 4:45 PM So 70% say that Dems are being appropriately or even insufficiently aggressive in challenging Bush.}}}

Look at this^^ the libs are polling to see if they should get another as-s whooping from the Bush Master.

I say yes! Hell yes, go for it.

Send him a subpoena, you sniveling Cowards, that worked real good with Rice. Until she got it and shoved it up your as-s anyway.

Yes, let’s have more of this.

I like seeing you grovel before the president, it’s actually the only time the mere sight of you doesn’t sicken me.

Losers.

You’re gonna hate 08®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:00 PM | Link to this

You know you’ve laid the beatdown to liberalism when all the sickasses can do is jack your ID and mention disgusting sexual epithets and thought processes.

Those people just aren’t Right.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

After I’m done choking on the transmission fluid laced dild@, then I’m going to shove my pet frog up my a$$. It’s a dirty job but someone has to do it.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this

All Americans who would rather see our war money against islamofascism be deflected to the LIE of man-made global warming raise your hands.

Man I’d love just ONE pathetic RAT to run on that platform next year. PLEASE.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

I just love talking to myself.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

I think that every dumb@ssed question by a sick lib like P!ss Softballs Matthews should be countered.

So after the question of “Do you think Bill Clinton should be back in the White House” there should be a question like “Why do you think Americans should work for what they want instead of depending on the government to steal from others and give it to them?”

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

What’s up PollyForeRednecks, don’t like Conservatives dominating a Conservative blog and laying the beatdown to you liberal cage monkeys from hell? Such a pitiful existence, that liberalism of RAT politics.

Sux to be you, RAT.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:27 PM | Link to this

Case Exhibit #12,439 of the disease of the overemotionalism of liberalism and failure to address the REAL WORLD.

Carbon Credits continue to be flushed down the toilet of hysterical liberalism faster than a sausage pizza through Billpecker Clintoon.

By jbmlaw

May 5, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this

Dear WD @ 12:17, although acknowledging the legitimacy of your argument, I always found PoFos posts amusing. Pythonesque maybe. He does represent the most responsible leftist thought, don’t you think?

Dear Bo @ 1:09, I would not wish to confuse you with facts, but I suspect Dr. Sowell had Pinochet’s Chile in mind when he posted his frustruation with our Congressional moonbats. Chile was a basket case under Allende, but turned around in less than five years under the Chicago boys’ guidance. And, of course, your allegation of conservative infatuation with fascisn is pure bunk - all fascists are socialists, and we have only one socialist party among the two majors here in the US. We conservatives stand for freedom. [Dr. Sowell may also have been thinking about Jefferson’s suggestion of a need for a revolution every 20 years or so, to keep the government from growing - a mainstream conservative sentiment.]

Lots of good stuff again today Markus (and WootenDull and Danish) - my compliments.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:35 PM | Link to this

Headline:

“Oprah invites accused rapist to show.”

Oh, they are just talking about R. “I pee on you” Kelly.

For a minute I thought they were talking about former Groper In Chief Billyboy Clintoon.

By Waiting for the axe to fall

May 5, 2007 5:42 PM | Link to this

Automakers can use “credits” to meet fuel economy mandates, even though their vehicles are less efficient than required and there is no requirement that consumers actually use alternative fuels.

The credit trading system would amount to a “wealth transfer” between automakers and have no impact on improving the environment, Bergquist said.

Experts have said it might require GM, Ford and Chrysler to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to Toyota and Honda in order to comply with the law.

Joan Claybrook, an environmental advocate who heads Public Citizen, said the bill “does not go far enough. Automakers could easily hit 40 miles per gallon,” she said. “With the polar bears and penguins in deep trouble, this is the year Congress will finally do something.”

Polar bears, penguins and my job you stupid muthers.

Go f*** nuclear and leave my job alone.

F*** global warming.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

Great post axe, here’s another on auto manufacturers giving the BIG MIDDLE FINGER to the liberal fallacy cult of man-made global warming. Keep in mind this link is over two years old.

And then there’s the Hummer vs. Prius study. Always the little scared girlie boy liberals that scaremonger people into economic submission. Another oldie, but a goodie for my archives for sick liberals and a reality b!tchslap.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

Remember, everything that is posted here by myself and other Conservatives is “hate speech” and we should be locked up and tortured.

This is what you fine fellow Americans are up against if you let the liberal neoMarxist RATs get the White House in 2008.

Got nazi?

By WootenDull

May 5, 2007 5:58 PM | Link to this

{{{By Waiting for the axe to fall May 5, 2007 5:42 PM Go f* nuclear and leave my job alone.}}}

Axe: Isn’t it amazing that the liberals cannot muster the courage to fight the Islamic terrorists, terrorists that kill women and children everyday, but yet they man up against the weather?

It should tell you everything you need to know about these dumbas-ses, they are sniveling little Cowards.

Spewing about the weather makes them feel brave.

They do suck, don’t they, jeez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

May 5, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

Just gaze at these wingnuts drivel.

When have they been right about anything?

Never.

I rest my case.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

What happened? Don’t tell me we chased off all those mealy mouthed liberals who infest this blog all week with pure bullsheet.

By Markus

May 5, 2007 6:13 PM | Link to this

“Just gaze at these wingnuts drivel. When have they been right about anything? Never. I rest my case.”

When did gitmo or any other liberal RAT ever really CHALLENGE what was posted today?

I rest MY case.

By Cornshucks

May 5, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

Acronym!!

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

By Jeff Gannon/Guckert

May 6, 2007 8:25 AM | Link to this

Andi and Markus came by last night to pray with me. We were on our knees all knight.

Well, actually they were on all fours…

By Jeff Gannon/Guckert

May 6, 2007 8:25 AM | Link to this

Andi and Markus came by last night to pray with me. We were on our knees all night.

Well, actually they were on all fours…

By Bottoms up for Bush

May 6, 2007 8:31 AM | Link to this

Jeff taught us this game last night - it’s not a drinking game, though. ;>

Andi

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By @@

May 6, 2007 8:32 AM | Link to this

CornShucker????:

Does your ^^^ 6:20 indicate the game you wanted to play with me yesterday?

CornShucker rules?

Does your Mommy know you’re online…having fun?

By Jeff Gannon/Guckert

May 6, 2007 8:35 AM | Link to this

OK, OK, so we weren’t praying - although Andi and Markus were hollering “oh God” alot, when their mouths weren’t full.