Thinking Right

By Mid-South Philosopher

March 2, 2007 8:05 AM | Link to this

Good morning, all, With respect to red light cameras, I have a problem with NOT being able to confront one’s “accuser.” Now, I understand that “radar” has been use for a half century or so, but, with that tool, there is a living, breathing officer to testify. In the camera scenario, the machine is the machine is the machine.

Were I charged via one of these Frankenstein monster devices, I would subpoena the damn thing into court to cross examine it!

If that failed, I would try to get the menagerie of lawyers, who argued before Judge Larry Seidlin in the Probate Court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, to defend me. After all, if you can’t beat them, confuse them.

By Brian Curtis

March 2, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this

Wooten, thanks for reminding me how Reagan helped launch the anti-labor attitude that has dominated our government for so many decades and helped crush the middle class.

I really should thank Mr. Reagan again. Now, does anyone know where he’s buried… and if there’s a soda machine nearby I can use to fill up first?

By JohnD

March 2, 2007 8:17 AM | Link to this

Are the members of PATCO headed for the unemployment line again? They probably should be.

A friend’s brother led the strikers in Miami and 2 years after President Reagan busted the strike this genius was still claiming the “biggest cover-up in the history of the US” had taken place. He could not identify what exactly was covered up but he went from a $60,000 a year government job to selling used cars.

Every union striker should have to deal with someone like Ronald Reagan.

By deegee

March 2, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this

I remember 1981 well. The country was in a recession and there was an abundant supply of well educated baby boomers in the work force. They are retiring now and being re-hired by companies that can’t find enough young workers to do jobs that require spatial and analytical skills. Go ahead and fire the air traffic controllers. They’ll be back at a lower wage and we will get what we pay for.

By Jim in Marietta

March 2, 2007 8:27 AM | Link to this

So you don’t want to wait for that green arrow to turn left? Great! Now you don’t have to. You have a choice. You can now pay a premium for your desire to save two minutes. I have had several near misses with people running red lights while turning left while I am proceeding straight through the intersection. The first SOB to hit me while pulling this trick is going to have more than a traffic violation to worry about!

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

March 2, 2007 8:42 AM | Link to this

Hi Jim,

I know you’ve been wriggling your toes in the sand this week, but have you been paying attention to your legislature?

Basically, they’re ignoring the wants/needs of their constituents and catering soley to the desires of their narrow special interest backers. Namely, Christians and those who would take advantage of the most financially desperate among us.

As detailed yesterday by your colleauge Maureen Downey, certain legislators have seen fit to introduce legislation written by those who are giving them money, with no apparent interest or need in the legislation coming from Georgians.

Today, another of your colleauges, James Salzer, is reporting that the GOP is stacking the committe responsible for passing the Sunday alcohol sales bill…something that Georgia residents do indeed want. The GOP doesn’t even want the bill out of committe so it can get the dreaded “up or down vote” (remember that?).

So from my perspective Jim, we have Republicans, who run almost exclusively against the ills of government intervention in peoples lives, intervening in two different cases to negatively impact Georgia residents. In one case, they’re allowing corporate interests to prey upon financially weak individuals, and in another case, they’re keeping me from picking up a sixer at the Kroger on Sunday.

You go on and on and on and on about how great Republicans are.

They suck. Just as bad as Democrats. There’s no moral high ground here. Politicians are w*******. It’s right there in black and white, in your very own fish wrapper.

All you do is cherry pick the issues that make Dems look bad and the GOP look good, while ignoring the blatant misdeeds of the GOP.

You’re not a reporter. Your a PR hack. You’re a shill for a pie in the sky ideology.

And to top it off, one of your biggest supporters on this blog consistently refers to himself as masturbating while writing (what’s your take on that anyway?). Your other biggest supporter is a libertarian who sees fit to allow corruption to continue because he doesn’t believe in this particular form of government.

I’m really glad I’m not one of your supporters.

By Brian Curtis

March 2, 2007 8:43 AM | Link to this

Yep, there’s nothin’ worse than workers thinking they have rights or something. That’s bad for business!

By Aquagirl

March 2, 2007 8:46 AM | Link to this

Oh, so now Republicans are worried about abuse of law-enforcement for the purposes of raising cash? Funny, they were all for D.A.R.E. cops driving around in confiscated cars. The insane drug war has resulted in wholesale seizure of property without due process.

Now these psuedo-conservatives in the GA assembly want to get media coverage time by whining about red-light cameras. What a joke. Any appearance of real concern for out-of-control government is purely coincidental.

If they’re so darn worried about our rights, you’d think they’d start somewhere besides the right to be T-boned and killed by red-light runners.

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

March 2, 2007 8:49 AM | Link to this

As long as we’re talking about dogs this morning, you Woo-ten Klanners owe me one - I once kilt a sheet-eating dog.

I saved your miserable lives.

By sharkeyextreme

March 2, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this

Ok who’s identity is the pinhead blog liberal going to steal today? What a child.

Why is Brian Nichols still alive? Murderer Brian Nichols is an example of why every law abiding citizen should be encouraged to own a gun. Look at all the taxpayer dollars that could have been saved had he been taken care of by a security-conscious citizen.

Well, somebody’s gotta say it.

By Jack

March 2, 2007 9:23 AM | Link to this

Yes Sharkey, and Al Amin (H. Rap Brown) too.

By JohnD

March 2, 2007 9:30 AM | Link to this

Jim’s a…

I agree with you on the Democrats and Republicans - there is hardly any difference in their conduct once in the Congress or the State Legislature.

Both parties live for the power, with the honor of service to nation and community a long forgotten reason to pursue public office. Instead of our best and brightest in public service we now have our most corrupt who have an almost open disdain for the people they are elected to serve

By Dusty

March 2, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this

Jim Wooten (in absentia),

You better hurry on home. The liberals are swarming here like locusts. I mean those evil red light cameras, insane drug wars, the ruinous Ronald Reagan, poor little labor unions, etc.etc.

I tell you. It’s something! But excuse me. I am going to apply to Law School. If lawyers are making $395/hr, that is the place for me. Here’s to justice for one and all.

By Van

March 2, 2007 9:36 AM | Link to this

Brian Curtis,

If PATCO had not broken the law, I wonder where they would be today? They were not allowed to strike by law and they ignored that little item. If they had just done another sick out, they might have succeeded.

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this

jim’s a leftist arse-licker

your intellectual dishonesty is quite stifling on this glorious morning. The truth bubbakins is that vapid leftist scum endlessly perpetuate their bollocks and corruption whilst their conservative betters constantly fulfill the role of watchdog.

Your cowardly assertions about my wanking prowess whilst I feverishly type my prose for others subsequently reveals your utter ignorance in my superior technique. Instead of endlessly spewing your marxist venom relax and studiously observe my TWIST and SHOUT technique.

twist…pull…twist…pull…twist…LEFTIST AFTERBIRTH…pull…twist…MARXIST VERMIN…pull…twist…LEFTIST WANKFACE…pull…AAAAAHHHH!!!!

HUGE i’ve fabulously enjoyed this fantastic wank SMIRK

By deegee

March 2, 2007 9:38 AM | Link to this

Dusty, I want to know about the law school that accepts you as a student.

By Van

March 2, 2007 9:38 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

It is my duty to please that booty.

By Burdell

March 2, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this

Has anyone (with the necessary salary information at hand) computed the hourly cost of the prosecutors in the Nichols case?

I wonder how it compares to Nichols’ lawyers.

By Dennis

March 2, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

By Jim’s a Cherry Picker March 2, 2007 8:42 AM

Whoa!, Whoa! I say. Just calm down. Calm down. Take a deep breath and let it out s-l-o-w-l-y….

YOU’RE RIGHT!!!

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By jbmlaw

March 2, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

Good morning all. Totally agree on the red light cameras – more efficient “catching” does not imply better government.

As to congressional candidates and age, that issue hits a little close to home for me – I’m too far from 30 to even remember, much less endorse those whipper-snappers.

The cure for NATCA is, obviously, privatization. Why we so willing rely on government competence when our lives are at stake, baffles me.

I still cannot fathom why the physician should prescribe the drug. If we cannot have everything sold over the counter, the second best solution would appear to be reliance on the competence of the pharmacist.

Our dogs are not overweight, they are merely fluffy.

Explosive past – I would thing the “duty to investigate” would kick in before the title changes, absent a fraudulent “why, no, this property never belonged to the Army.”. 27 years later sounds too long.

Judge should audit the expenditure of funds in the Nichols trial, if that is the only excuse for not going forward.

We all know that section of the Constitution that requires Congress to act on “environmental and genetic factors that make children sick.” I’m sure they teach that in schools as prerequisite to KumBaYa. 101.

If children are followed from conception to age 21, it is time to get a protective order against the stalker.

By Richard

March 2, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this

Hey, tftt - are you masterbating while typing again?

By deegee

March 2, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this

Van, just how much sick time would the PATCO workers have been allowed before they would have been fired? Just wondering.

By V for Vendetta

March 2, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this

Anyone look at statistics regarding accidents INCREASING once red-light cameras go in? Minor accidents sometimes increase as motorists break hard for fear of running the light.

Watch yourself people, these cash generating money-makers are getting out of hand. Soon there will be photo-radar ticketing you as your drive by (they’ve had it in Europe for years). This all appears under the guise of public safety, but it has NOTHING to do with safety and EVERYTHING to do with money.

What’s next? Well, with current GPS-based technology it is conceivable that your car’s actions could be monitored at all times. An insurance company could obtain that information and use it in their policy decisions. It could even be used to immobolize and rowdy teen’s car if the parents noticed the GPS showed them speeding.

Many cars already have the necessary deviced installed within them now. With some simple tweaking, GM’s OnStar system could be used in such a way. Ditto any car with GPS-based navigation.

If safety is your concern, what we need is a better driver education program and far harsher penalties for DUI’s and serious automotive infractions. In Germany, the land of the unrestricted interstate, the accident rate is FAR lower than it is here. Drivers must go through extensive training, expensive classes, and strict penalties for grievous mistakes.

When you’re given control of a two-ton machine, all that training doesn’t sound unreasonable to me.

By Mullah Reece

March 2, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

Were are those “red’ lights? Are they mostley in poorer streets were drivers are not given a recurse but to pay? Do though rich poeple get stoped? At who are they aimed at? We all no.

By Rod

March 2, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

Mid-South Philosopher - regarding your 8:05 post. You said you: “have a problem with NOT being able to confront one’s “accuser.” Excuse me?

If you go to court, the picture is laying on the table in front of you and the judge. The picture shows that the traffic light is red and your car is in the intersection. Um, your defense is …. ?

Get a clue. You break a law, be man enough to accept your punishment. You’re starting to act like tftt.

By Curious Observer

March 2, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

I’m all for not only ticketing but also suspending the licenses of those selfish ba**ards who feel free to sail through red lights in order to save a minute. I see it all the time, including people who turn left 20 seconds after the left-turn arrow has turned green. They are a menace to us all. One of my great joys last Saturday was watching a cop pull over one of them when the self-important a-hole thought he would sail through a red light with impunity. The phony-baloney “confront my accuser” argument doesn’t wash with me. If a city profits from red-light cameras, so much the better. Let the dangerous drivers pay the freight for more rigid traffic law enforcement. Use the money to hire even more cops and install even more cameras than property tax revenues or user fees would ordinarily afford. Where’s the “law and order” crowd on this issue? Why are they moaning about traffic law enforcement by camera? Is it all right to use no-knock warrants and other intrusive measures to enforce the laws they like, but abhorrent to use cameras to enforce the ones they don’t like?

Casey Cagle’s little stunt of stacking the committee that is considering Sunday alcohol sales is a prime example of Republican hypocrisy. Provided a measure will suit the redneck taste, any bill will sail through the Republican legislature “because the public supports it.” But introduce a popular proposal that offends the knuckle-draggers and preachers, and you’ll see all the stops installed, regardless of public support.

By deegee

March 2, 2007 10:00 AM | Link to this

V, the purpose of the yellow light is to warn motorists that the light is about to turn red. If you don’t have enough time to stop for red after the light turns yellow then you should be ticketed for speeding.

By Rod

March 2, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this

Hey V for Vendetta - how about just not breaking the law? Huh? Ever thought of that one?

Your argument that accidents are increasing due to red-light cameras is pathetic. First, it’s not true. It is a fact that rear-ending accidents have gone up (thanks to the jack@$$ in the second car that plans to flagrantly run the red light). However, the overall number of accidents has decreased. And what’s more important, the life-threatening T-bone accidents have dramatically decreased. 10 rear-end accidents for 1 T-bone is still a good trade-off.

Grow up. You’re an adult, obey the law and if you break it, pay the price. You’re a waste of breath.

By jbmlaw

March 2, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this

Dear JaCP @ 8:42, I respectfully disagree with your perspective – the “corrupt” are those who restrict freedom merely because they think nobody should be responsible for his own incompetence.

Dear Brian @ 8:43, workers have the only important right – the right to leave. Employers cannot compel anyone to stay, as we have abolished involuntary servitude.

By @@

March 2, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

Red-light cameras? - I wonder Jim…who eats more, the red-light cameras or the cop hiding behind the billboard?

Jim Whitehead? - A fine wine is better with age. If they sit there too long, they ferment and become sour.

The NATCA? - Unions are terrorists that should frighten any child.

T.V. advertisement of drugs? - I think they scare more people than attract. My goodness, who wants to use something after they’ve been told that it may cause dizziness, headache, diarrhea, constipation, nausea & vomiting

Not me, that’s for sure.

Overweight dogs? - ‘Ya know Jim, when I first saw your headline, I took it to mean that “overweight dogs were politicians. Anyway, my parents always reminded me to clean my plate because there were people starving in other countries.

I get to sit at the grown-up table now, and don’t have to clean my plate if I don’t want to. I don’t waste though. I give the scraps to my dog, Buddy. He’s fat.

You know what they say Jim, if a woman wants to look thin, then she should hang out with fat Buddys.

Stunned & Angry? - She needs to blow that excuse up her…….sewer pipe?

Brian Nichols? - Why in the world does that man need three attorneys? Is it one for every victim he was witnessed gunning down?

Nationwide study? - I know all too much about politician’s “Field of Dreams”, build the massive government programs, so I can play “Shoeless Joe”.

Catch ‘ya later Jim.

By Rod

March 2, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

Mullah Reece - are you illiterate? Your 9:57 post looks like it was written by a child.

Your version:

Were are those “red’ lights? Are they mostley in poorer streets were drivers are not given a recurse but to pay? Do though rich poeple get stoped? At who are they aimed at? We all no.

The corrected version:

Where are those “red” lights? Are they mostly in poorer neighborhoods where drivers are not given a recourse but to pay? Do the rich people get stopped? At who are they aimed at? We all know.

Go back to your minimum wage job and get off the internet.

By jbmlaw

March 2, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

Dear Mullah @ 9:57, so you think it is merely coincidence that there are no red light cameras around St. Ives or Sugarloaf? Shocking.

Dear Curious @ 9:59, we could almost certainly increase the revenues if we privatized. Would you support that idea?

By Dusty

March 2, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

Deegee,

I must leave for a while. But I want you to know that Harvard and Yale are fighting over my applications for Law School. The one that guarantees that I will make $395/hr will get my prestigious credentials. I will let you know the results.

jbmlaw…don’t cry. I didn’t put you down as a reference.

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

@ brainless curtis … if you were on fire turdbrain I wouldn’t even P!SS on you!!

I see the anal obsessive stalker who’s even more slippery than a San Fran Sicko sewer rat’s douchebag is back puking up its anal obsessive bile. Please kill yourself quietly and without fuss or media attention this afternoon - there’s a good unhinged leftist bastard!!

@ STUPID DICK … looks like you’ve been generously freed for a rare day away from your Emory experimental chemical castration primate experiments.

I see that redneKKKs NAMBLA - the resident VT child molestor is back to feverishly talkkking about its fave subject - coprophagia. We proud right wing conservatives all know NAMBLA’s stinky litle secret though … if it had a sh!t there’d be nothing left!!

By jm

March 2, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

The only issue I have with the red light cameras is the kickback given to the manufacturers for each ticket issued.

Regarding paying attention to medical care, how about opening up all court records for every doctor. No more sealed settlements. If a doctor had a malpractice suit filed against him, I want to know the details even if the case was settled and the records “sealed”.

With military base closings, I wonder how many of these will be converted to residential areas. I wonder what might still be under the ground in those places.

I wonder if a title search would mention that the land was a former military base.

By Jim's a Cherry Picker

March 2, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

Jbmlaw,

I hear ya. But problem is, there is a deficit of knowledge in that relationship that gives a distinct advantage to one side.

Free markets, as I’m sure you’re aware, are predicated upon each side of a transaction having a sound understanding of the relationship.

Buyers in a grocery store can go to the bread aisle and look at the various types of bread. They can see their prices, and develop a basic understanding of the relationship between cost vs. quality. But ultimately, they have little understanding of the company that made the bread, what their labor practices are, what the ingredients really are, whether or not they pay their taxes, etc…

The buyer is free to do that research, but why would they? It’s just a loaf of bread. The risk is low.

With other transactions that interface with the lowest common denominators in our society, the transaction itself is predicated on the purchaser having little, if any, real knowledge about the product or the company. The product is moderately complicated (there’s numbers and stuff) and the buyer (in the case of payday lenders) might be in distress. Additionally, the seller can make it difficult for the buyer to really understand the agreement by throwing up a lot of technical jargon, process, procedures, contracts, etc…further tilting the advantage to their side.

Consumers cannot possibly always have all the information or understanding that they need to make fair trades in the marketplace (how many folks out there know who owns Citgo? How many conservatives on this blog know who owns the “Washington Times”). And while it’s not the government’s job to be the nanny, there is a responsiblity for it to ensure that the playing field is either level, or that the most disadvantaged among us are not blatantly taken advantage of.

Market’s aren’t perfect and they never will be. There’s too great an incentive to cheat. Additionally, with the help of lobbyists, those with the money can always engineer ways to rig the game in their favor.

If everybody played fair, we wouldn’t be discussing this topic. But they don’t. Because if they do, they get screwed.

By Tara

March 2, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this

Just a quick response to Jim’s comment about air traffic controllers. This is a point that jbmlaw might appreciate: supply and demand. The President isn’t in any position to be firing them any controllers this time — otherwise our economy would find itself in a world of hurt. Air traffic controllers have the upper hand this time around.

By Walter Sobchek

March 2, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this

Speaking of overweight dogs, anybody heard how Sonny’s diet is coming along? It’s the sucking the public trough dry diet.

I pray for the IRS to put the corrupt crank yanker on a baloney sandwich in prison diet.

By Free Wheeling

March 2, 2007 10:42 AM | Link to this

I say screw the red light cameras and put all available resources on rounding up cyclists who completely ignore traffic signals and signs and apparently believe that their sacred motto, “Same Road. Same Rules”, really means, “Same Road. Rules only apply to cyclists if it benefits them at the moment otherwise they can do whatever harebrained thing they want anytime they want”. Vigilante posses should be considered to assist the police.

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

How fitting that the sleazy sex pest leftist mayor of San Fran Sicko, who defied the law to marry queers and diikes officially approves a day celebrating a film company that produces Bwarney Fwank’s fave entertainment - homosexual porn. Watch NAMBLA, the anal obsessive stalker, wanker steve and all the other leftist filth on here fly out to Frisco for the depraved celebration!!

Dear oh dear … the thuggish misogynist ebonics spouting garbage hippety hop has hilariously suffered a whopping 21% reduction in CD sales. Guess the incarceration rate of the scum who listen to/perpetrate this mindless gangsta lovin’ bollocks has finally taken its toll.

Why oh why is the long awaited civil war in Gaza starting so slowly? This is extremely selfish of the mohammedan fascists thugs involved - I’ve bought some extra popcorn and am waiting for the entertaining footage to begin!!

I’ve just seen the long range forecast for Tehran next month in the Jerusalem Post … a little bit cloudy and 500000.F

Time for all good law abiding Americans to burn their Bank of Amigo credit cards. Any company that faciltates the illegal FIFTEEN MILLION and counting mexican type infestation should be boycotted.

How bleedin’ hilarious … Osama Obama’s mammy’s ancestors (the usually ignored white ones) apparently owned slaves too. Lets hope that they were from the micky mouse so called reverend J Jackasson’s line, then poor old Sharptongue will have someone equally odious and shameless in front of the cameras to share the liberal media spotlight with!!

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/politics/bal-te.obama02mar02,0,3453027.story

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

every damn day yours truly factually vanquishes resident leftist feckpigs and every damn day those same leftist feckpigs feverishly puke their hateful bile and venom! Glib marxist afterbirth like NAMBLA, stupid dick, brainless curtis, and curious peepingtom relentlessly proffer irascible leftist propaganda bollocks in hopes that some slutty leftist trollop graciously dotes them with attention a la Lewinsky.

These vainglorious leftist wankpigs fail to recognise the blindingly obvious fact that their enlightened conservative betters including yours truly maintain our tranquil intellectual demeanor through our fabulously superior wanking technique!! All you fooking leftist nutters STFU and observe!!

twist…shout…LEFTIST NUTTERS…twist…shout…STINKING MARXIST FECKPIGS…twist…shout…SLIPPERY LEFTIST AFTERBIRTH…twist…shout…ANAL MARXISTS…twist…shout…AAAAAHHH!!!

HUGE what a glorious wank SMIRK!!

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

careful there free wheeling … you’ll have the car hating nutter harold mincing all over you for honest hate speech against cyclists!!

By Van

March 2, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this

deegee,

This came out of Wikipedia -

It was initially founded in 1968 and succeeded in being recognized as a collective bargaining agent in 1969, after a brief labor stoppage referred to as the “sickout”. To circumvent the federal law against strikes by government unions, numerous controllers called in sick. After a few days the federal courts intervened and most controllers went back to work by order of the court, but the government was forced to the bargaining table. The controllers won substantial pay raises (about 110% their previous pay.

Gee, it worked once, but 12 years later, they had forgotten their own history.

By jbmlaw

March 2, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

Dear Tara @ 10:34, since all ATCs (except I think Russia of China?) control in English, it is at least possible that the jobs could be outsourced to computer geeks in Mumbai. The number of American ATCs may be limited, but privatization would unleash the worldwide population available through the magic of internet.

By tired

March 2, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

Tara,

I disagree with your statement that the controllers have the upper hand. I believe there are numerous controllers out there looking to get into the local market.

I say this because I know of many military controllers who are trying to enter this particular part of the industry. And, have considerable experience handling a considerably higher number of aircraft.

By V for Vendetta

March 2, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this

Rod and Deegee,

You are obviously both a lot smarter than I. How silly of me to think that the increased ability of the government to monitor our every action is something worth worrying about. I’m sure that neither of you ever speed. You probably drive at the posted limit wherever you go. Most people speed on some level. There are myriad roads where the speed limit doesn’t reflect the possible driving conditions (ex. Hwy 78 up towards Athens where the posted limit remains a pathetic 55mph). The only reason the limit remains low is because that road is a cash cow for Walton County. Anyone who commutes that drive on a daily basis can tell you that.

Rod, if minor rear-end accidents have gone up (as you agreed) then how could overall accidents DEcrease? T-bone accidents, while terrible, are fairly rare. If one were to look into the history of intersections in the metro area, one would find that just about every single one of them has had at least one fatality. Should we pepper the road with cameras because of this? Is that the answer? Or would it make more sense to teach people how to drive a car better?

One of those proposals generates money and one does not. Still wonder why people choose the cameras? It’s sickening.

I would also contend that you’ll find the number of fatality accidents not greatly decreased. A driver who is going to commit such a heinous error as t-boning a car is probably not someone too concerned by a $100 fine. The stats don’t lie guys. It’s the wool being pulled over your eyes so the local law enforcement can make quick and easy money. The safety argument is an illusion.

I’ll stop speeding when you stop speeding Rod. Sorry to be such a waste.

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

Awwww … how cute …

the anal obsessive socially inadequate stalker is gleefully taking out its hen pecked ritalin abusing mommy’s boy asexual frustration on its conservative intellectual betters. Now if the court ordered operation had also sewn up its GIANT sphincter muscle instead of just its filthy simpering leftist mouth we’d now be free of its anal obsessive leftist puke.

its fab fun deliberately (and systematically) using patter and banter that while factually accurate about marxist cut and run turds is relatively easy to replicate … if NOTHING else it shows how easy it is to effortlessly manipulate certain resident wankpig lefty afterbirths who are ENDLESSLY sitting there anally and excitedly reading my posts and absorbing the distilled DEATH TO ALL LEFTIES wisdom - like an energiser amoeba ridden with transexual scabies.

By Rod

March 2, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

Again V for Vendetta, grow up and take responsibility for your actions.

By Jack

March 2, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

If Israel decided to take out Tehran they should not consult with the gutless US gov’t. I can hear the screams coming from the left asking Israel to “talk to them”.

Save some of that popcorn for me. :)

By Van

March 2, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this

One of the problems I have with the red light cameras is the revenue it generates on an ongoing basis for the manufacturer of the camera. It is not only a cash cow for the localities where they are installed, but private companies are collecting part of the fines paid, as a kick back. For some reason, this does not sound like a firm business practice for a local government, or a private business.

By Lee

March 2, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

Re: red light cameras.

I think they should pass a law that does the following:

Maybe then, the police could get back to patrolling the neighborhoods looking for criminals instead of trying to generate revenue.

By Aquagirl

March 2, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this

V, you’re one of those that only worries about government intrusion when it reaches you. All this homeland-security/in your business crap has been going on for years, and now the same Stepford Legislators are supposedly freaking about red light cameras. They have all the sincerity of a TFTT post advocating affirmative action.

The only reason the Repubs settled the red-light bill is so they could get on with quietly (they hope) strangling the bill on Sunday beer and wine sales.

By V for Vendetta

March 2, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

Time for the truth?

Time for someone to put the Thesarus away. People like you fail to realize that extremism in either direction is harmful to society.

People like you decry terrorists for foolishly blowing themselves up in the name of religion. We laugh at their ideas of forty virgins in the afterlife and assinine belief that the infidels should be vanquished. Yet here in the South, every Sunday, we find the masses prostrate in church professing a slavish devotion to a misguided faith. Sure, they’re not blowing up civilians or attacking American in the most cowardly way possible. Of course, then again, most religious zealots down here will not tolerate anyone that does not share their beliefs and take every opportunity to hate on gays, other religions, other races, etc.

If you want a theocracy, by all means let me know. I need time to pack my bags. Conservatism is fine. Extreme conservatism is not. It’s the same on the left side of the aisle. I’m sure you’ll denounce me as a leftish, what was the word, afterbirth? I can assure you I’m not. I’m just someone who finds extremism to be dangerous in any form.

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this

tut tut aquaHAG

you know damn well I would NEVER even stoop to making a twisted sick joke about supporting racist quotas for blacks or any other minority!! Some things … like naturally despising ALL Bush derangement syndrome leftists are sacrosanct!

By Jack

March 2, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

Hey V. That’s 79 virgins. Who wouldn’t kill themselves for that?

By Jack

March 2, 2007 11:37 AM | Link to this

May be 78.

By jm

March 2, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

Van@11:20 - Stop the presses !!! We agree on something (see my post at 10:30).

By time for the truth

March 2, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

I eagerly await the glorious day when we rightfully deport all black vermin back to afriKa!! These black parasites have endlessly posed as a burdensome lot on American society. The darker types constantly bleat about slavery and Jim Crow whilst they glibly ignore the blindingly obvious fact that they never suffered one day since they arrived on these shores..much to their pathetic benefit indeed!!

The incessantly grotesque behaviour of black hippety hop thug vermin causes me to long for the glorious days before the cheating and plagiarising baptist preacher began crying about civil rights!! Fortunately there is one organisation who refuses to cower in face of the shameless bullying tactics of black racists like Sharptongue and JJackasson!!

By Mid-South Philosopher

March 2, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

Rod, relative to your 9:58 A.M. response.

Does the photo clearly show that I am the driver?

Does the photo show the child with the severe laceration and excessive bleeding in the back seat?

Does the photo show the 80,000 pounds semi with squealing brakes behind me?

Do we know that the timing mechanism is working properly?

And those are just the first few questions.

Government is impersonal at best. Police power of govenment is even more impersonal. Mechanical police power should not be tolerated.

By getalife

March 2, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

Imagine sleeping on a bus to wake up to a horrible crash and your bus has flipped on 75.

Or in a high school with a tornado blowing down a wall crushing you.

This is life in the real world.

Geez.

By Heather

March 2, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this

V at 11:28,

One man’s heresy is another man’s orthodoxy.

By Tara

March 2, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this

tired,

Let’s apply a little economics here. Generally, the less competition there is for a position, the more money existing workers make for that position (again, supply and demand). Air traffic controllers are in a dispute with the FAA over staffing levels. In other words, despite such potential economic benefits (more money, better benefits), they’re begging the FAA to hire more controllers (controllers are retiring faster than the FAA is hiring). In this case, union members are putting air traffic safety ahead of their long-term personal finances (yes, they’re asking for more money because they’re understaffed, working longer hours with less rest, etc.). As members of the flying public, if air traffic controllers say that they’re under-staffed, then we had better listen.

FYI, the FAA is yet another agency run by incompetents appointed by President Bush who put ideology above public safety.

By Lord Doom

March 2, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Doom is 35 today!!!!!

Everyone on this blog needs to sing ‘Happy Birthday to Doom’.

By Jack

March 2, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

We don’t sing to relatives of the one who killed our beloved Superman.

By Lord Doom

March 2, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

Jack,

Even though Doom would have loved to do that, I’m not related to Doomsday. Doomsday is a hideous,albiet, wonder of a creature.

By Aquagirl

March 2, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

especially me, Doom.

By Lord Doom

March 2, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

Aquagirl,

Doom is really not that bad a guy once you get to now him. All I seek is world domination, that’s all.

By Redneck Convert

March 2, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this

Well, I hope TFTT don’t slip up while playing with hisself. He could accidently say something nice about a librul before the “Ahhh!” comes. I’m telling you all, this guy is dangerus. I expect any day to see a news flash about a maniac loose with a gun downtown. We should all just take his posts as something a two year old kid would say. The guy is just boiling with hate. Like someone else got his toy and he can’t stand it.

I’m against these red light cameras. It has got to the point that a fellow can’t even sip his beer while going thru a light. You could get arrested for drunk driving and running a red light too. And all by mail. What kind of laws is that? Next thing you know they will be ticketing people for having sex while driving. These laws is against Georgia rednecks and I’m going to call Sonny and Casey.

I hope Sister Dusty does go to law school. I can see her in a court room now. “Your honor, I object. The other side is cutting and running and they are traders and unAmerican!” That’s all she ever writes on this blog anyway. Maybe she could team up with jbmlaw and then everybody in the area could get clipped good.

Well, got to stay with the beer run. The bars need to stock up for all the Baptists for the weekend. They drink up a river of beer, but they sure don’t want it sold on Sunday. Tell Harold don’t forget to buy his booze by midnight Saturday. We don’t want no sneaking around on Sunday in the self checkout line. It would be unChristian.

By Aquagirl

March 2, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this

Well, Doom, you’re better than the Republicans, who want to control the entire Known Universe, or even more insidious—-Sunday Beer and Wine sales.

I will concede your world dominion if you let us buy a six-pack on Sunday, cut taxes, and make zoo Atlanta show the panda cam 24/7. Maybe throw in a couple of terrorist’s heads on public display, and you’ll really turn me to the Doom side.

By Lord Doom

March 2, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

Aquagirl,

You are a goddess among insects. Doom definetly supports Sunday alcohol sales. I’m orginally from Mississippi and we used to love to turn up a fifth after church.

By GRCleft

March 2, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

jbmlaw,

As much as you might prefer to risk thousands of lives to save a buck, tower controllers can’t and shouldn’t land planes via the internet from India.

Stick to fake law.

By sharkeyextreme

March 2, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this

Yes, people really die in this world and accidents really happen. The government can’t protect us from everything you know. Especially not from the Georgia DOT Einsteins who design things like a kamikaze exit ramp off an HOV lane that ends right on top of the interstate. It’s surprising that a midnight drunk didn’t done it sooner with a car, especially in that area of partiers. Do they give out Darwin Awards to government DOT road designers?

By JK

March 2, 2007 1:58 PM | Link to this

But anything that moves consumers from passivity to active management of their health has to be good.

I would agree with this statement, Mr. Wooten, if it weren’t made in the context of supporting the huge waste of money that is pharmaceutical prime time advertising. Yes, medicines ARE good when needed, but the idea that just a pill fixes the damage people do over time eating well-marketed garbage, and sitting on their expanding lard deposits is just more enabling of bad choices. Whether that money could be better spent is an opinion directly related to one’s value system; for those who think greed is a virtue, HERE: have a little purple pill! And a blue one! Is the cheese-in-crust pizza here yet? Don’t forget to finish up!

By jbmlaw

March 2, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this

Dear CRCleft @ 1:38, I understand your appeal to racism, but the Indians are perfectly competent.

By Southern Democrat

March 2, 2007 2:14 PM | Link to this

I find it interesting that the Air Traffic Controller debate is dominating the conversation today. I would say that of President Reagan’s many successes, that decision was not one of them.

I would like to ask some of more learned conservative friends on this blog this question (asked in a neutral tone, out of complete curiosity):

Looking back, knowing what you know now and not what you knew then, do you think it would have been better to spend the money we have spent on the Iraq Conflict on intranational defense (e.g., securing airports through hiring private corporations to evaluate risks, installing bomb detecting devices in airports, securing our ports, etc.) or do you think that we received good national security value for our dollars spent in Iraq?

I realize that subjective perspective enters into every discussion, even the way I’ve phrased this question, so if there is a more content-neutral way of phrasing it, please suggest it.

By compassionate libertarian

March 2, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

re: Brian Nichols and the issue of state-funded criminal defense. I understand the Constitutional reasons criminal defendants are provided legal representation. I paid better than $300/hour for legal representation in a civil matter. Is there not something un-Constitutional about the state picking up the tab to ensure a (yet to be convicted) murderer is represented, while law-abiding, tax-paying citizens have to foot their own legal bills in civil cases? I guess at the end of the day it’s not so much a question of “justice” or the law, as it is there is no question the lawyers will always get paid.

By Dave

March 2, 2007 2:29 PM | Link to this

Re: PATCO

If a worker has a right to strike… the employer has a right to fire. That seem fair & balanced to me. Why does one out weight the other?

By jbmlaw

March 2, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

Dear Southern @ 2:14, you raise two issues and I respectfully disagree.

(1) On air traffic controllers, as best as I can tell that was the last significant strike anywhere in any US industry in the past 27 years. To the extent that one appreciates labor peace, looks like a resounding success to me.

(2) As to the Iraq matter, I think I would have preferred not funding Department of Energy, Department of Urban Affairs, Department of Agriculture, and Department of Education to fund your intranational defense projects – Iraq served a purpose, I cannot tell that the entities I listed serve any useful purpose.

By jm

March 2, 2007 2:51 PM | Link to this

jbmlaw@2:38 - Department of Energy is who handles the nuclear weapons (among other tasks).

By atc

March 2, 2007 2:57 PM | Link to this

Just an attempt for a little information sharing from someone who works at air trafic control (ATC). 1st, check this link to the ATO website: text to be linked

please note that at the beginning the author states that lower staffing is justified because there is less traffic. Then 5th Para. from the bottom the FAA administrator states that “The system is in trouble because we have squeezed every ounce of capacity that’s out there,” Which is it? traffic less or more?

According to govt data. the traffic at the 5 major NY facilities has increased an average of 10% while staffing at these facilities has dropped by 12% and 20% in the 3 big airports.

Privatization? You think the union has leverage? Just wait until the private contractor goes to Congress and says that unless they get a $5 billion infusion that the system will collapse. Oh Boeing…Lockheed is blackmailing us, do you think you can take over the busiest air traffic system in the world by 6am tomorrow? I’ve got to think that life doesn’t get much better than a government sponsored monopoly.

If those controllers don’t like it they should work somewhere else - Oh yeah, nobody else but the government hires controllers (e.g. you remember the car salesman in the earlier post).

So, there are no free market rules to apply here. Its a monopoly of the sky (let’s see, which ATC company should your pilot use today?) and its a monopoly of employment.

If any of you have engineering background you might remember how bridges used to be designed to carry 250% of the anticipated max load. some folks decided that was wasteful and the number is now (I believe) 150%. you just hope that the guy pouring the concrete didn’t come to work with a hangover. And how many strands can be cut from the safety net before it won’t be able to hold that plane about to fall. I’m not saying it’s there (do you remember Lexington, KY or is it already forgotten) but it is a question that should be asked by engineers and people who actually know something about ATC not by actuaries. BTW, probably 1/2 of the people in the FAA administration have no ATC experience or are folks who couldn’t work the traffic and ran to a nice safe desk job.

By sharkeyextreme

March 2, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this

On air traffic controllers, as best as I can tell that was the last significant strike anywhere in any US industry in the past 27 years.

jbmlaw, I respectfully disagree. The last major strike that caused the loss of thousands of jobs, not to mention the loss of a company, happened at Eastern. First striked the machinist union and then the pilot’s union. Man those union picketers sure showed Eastern. That’s typical of the union mutaneers though. Sink the ship to make a point.

Incidentally, the Eastern debacle started 17 years ago tomorrow.

By Southern Democrat

March 2, 2007 3:04 PM | Link to this

Jbmlaw,

(Tongue placed firmly in cheek) Have you already forgotten the plights of our poor professional athletes who have had to strike for a fair wage? Athletes of the World Unite!

I took issue with President Reagan’s actions because it was not the least disruptive alternative; it was a power play. In the interests of full disclosure, though, a family member was an Army Air Corps Air Traffic Controller at old Candler Field and so I have a soft spot for them.

You, of course, forgot the most glaring bureaucratic blunder (and on which you and I agree), the Department of Homeland Security, with its airport agency Thousands Standing Around (TSA).

By Tom Emory

March 2, 2007 3:25 PM | Link to this

REMEMBER this about the “great Communicator.” He WAS a Union member and president of SAG when he made accusations against his OWN Union Members during the McCarthy “witch hunts” in the 50s.

By Jack

March 2, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this

Yes. The Eastern pilots were told that if they went out, the company would fold. The greedy bastards went out and everyone lost their jobs. The pilots went on to other airlines while everyone else went jobless. A pox on those pilots.

By Lily Toad

March 2, 2007 4:11 PM | Link to this

If the DA had accepted Brian Nichols’ guilty plea and put him in prison for the rest of his life we, the taxpayers, wouldn’t have to pay for defense lawyers when there is no defense. He did it, he admitted it, lock him up.

By Dusty

March 2, 2007 4:25 PM | Link to this

Dear Rednecks,

Just got home from a day of hard labor and read your words of wisdom. Well, that is, I read what you posted which is pretty much the same every day.

Hey, nobody has to go to Law School to call liberals cut-n-runners and unAmerican etc. Just read AJC blogs.

But the problem is, as truthful as that might be, it does not pay $395/hr that lawyers make. Therefore I have given some great law schools the chance of a lifetime…my enrollment!!

Will let you know which university gets the honor of my presence. Hello Harvard! Hello Yale!! (Do you think I should ask Ted Kennedy to speak up for me at Harvard?)

By Van

March 2, 2007 4:31 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

If loving you is wrong, I don’t want to be right.

By Jack

March 2, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this

Lily. In order to get life without parole they must first try for the death penalty. The new legislation is to eliminate that caveat and will save lots of money. (we have it on tape, they should take him out and shoot him as he did to his victims)

By @@

March 2, 2007 4:41 PM | Link to this

‘Ya know Jim, I didn’t read the very last paragraph in your article.

That would be a whole bunch of busy government agents now, wouldn’t it? I can just see it now….

One agent assigned to each unmarried person.

If you count the teens having sex, that could get to be a pretty expensive government program.

A whole lot of “porking” going on.

You’re a funny guy Jim.

By sharkeyextreme

March 2, 2007 4:42 PM | Link to this

UPS cancels it’s Airbus A380 freighter order of 10 planes because they were not confident Airbus could meet it’s delivery schedule due to labor issues. FedEx has already done so. The combined have hurt Airbus bigtime. French unions have called for a one day strike aand German workers may join them.

Well at least those nations have a massive social safety net to fall back on. Perhaps that’s why the EU has a much higher unemployment rate than we do. Go ahead unions, shoot yourselves in the other foot. http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070302/france_airbus.html?.v=16&.pf=taxes

By Lily Toad

March 2, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

Jack, I think the plea bargain was going to be for life without parole. That was my impression from a news story from the AJC on 2/9/07:

“Parker would not comment on what sentence Nichols would be willing to accept.

But in most such cases, the defendant pleads guilty with the assurance of a sentence of life in prison without parole, rather than death.”

By JohnD

March 2, 2007 5:26 PM | Link to this

We have at least one post claiming there is a shortage of ATCs and another indicating there are former military ATCs lusting for a job in the public sector. So, which is it?

A few years prior to the PATCO strike I had the opportunity (misfortune?) to participate in a basketball league with a team of ATCs. Frightening to think some of those guys held hundreds of lives in their hands every day. Violent tempers, instability and recklessness were the trademarks of most of them. Not a scientific study I admit, but a sample.

The point already made here about the right to leave the job is important. If you want to control your own destiny then start a business for yourself since the employee has no “right” to a job. If the working conditions, other employees, or the employer do not meet your desires your only “right” is to leave.

If the ATCs are as skilled as some would like to assert then they will be in demand somewhere, if not as an ATC then at some other position requiring similar skills.

The three lawyers for Brian Nichols are in the case for the publicity with a nice check to tide them over until the really big dollars roll in after this trial. The only lawyer in town starved until the second moved in - and then they both became rich.

By ATC

March 2, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

I used to play basketball against a guy named JohnD. He was one stupid SOB. He passed when he should have taken the shot and shoot when he should have passed. Then when he missed, he’d call foul on some guy sitting in the bleachers.

Violent temper? When you’re on the court with a crybaby hack like this clown, who wouldn’t lose their cool? Playing against JohnD was more stressful than landing a 767.

Not a scientific study I admit, but a sample.

By JohnD Dropped His Popsicle

March 2, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

JohnD,

Ever play basketball against the Marhabas?

By Nicole

March 2, 2007 6:16 PM | Link to this

“If the ATCs are as skilled as some would like to assert then they will be in demand somewhere, if not as an ATC then at some other position requiring similar skills.”

JohnD seems to think that air traffic control work requires about as much skill as working at Dairy Queen.

Tell us JohnD, what other positions require similar skills as monitoring and directing air traffic?

By Violent, Unstable , and Reckless Secularist

March 2, 2007 6:22 PM | Link to this

JohnD,

I’m a secularist. What do you say we get together for a little roundball?

You know what they say — you don’t know a secularist until you’ve played basketball with one.

By aaronhumes

March 2, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this

i wonder how many folks b*** here, including me, would actually want to run for elected office….seeems like we’re a collection of righteous geniuses.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 8:24 AM | Link to this

Well, I see our resident liberal gutter RAT @sshole ID jackin’ hoo-hah queef has had fun with everyone’s IDs all week. What a worthless piece of sh!t. You would think this bastard would be in a better mood since his sick liberal RAT pack took over Congress, but hell no. Just as miserable a jackal as always. The Party Of The Permanently Miserable is permanently PATHETIC.

Anyway, today is National Disadvantaged People’s Day. Please send an encouraging message to a sick liberal just as I have done:

I don’t care if you wait tables, screw pillows, protest and boycott everything, or occasionally $h!t yourself over a Conservative blog comment. You are just a disadvantaged liberal.

But you hang in there sunshine, I think you’re still pretty flucking special.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 8:40 AM | Link to this

Since no liberal pseudo-experts on every topic in the media have done any research on this (like Chris “Softballs” Matthews or Wolfman Blitzface), I’d like to comment on the Southeast and Midwest tornado outbreak on Thursday. Well, in all fairness, Katie Couric did get scared on Thursday’s CB.S. Evening Newspropoganda and had a question about “the connection.” Hey, I’m all for “fair” reporting and accuracy. Cute little perky Couric:

“Bryan, I understand people have been asking you this all day, does this (that would be the tornado spawning on Thursday for you liberals ITP) have anything to do with global warming?”

Uh oh. We had another bad outbreak of tornadoes that tragically killed some people. Well, they were in “Red States” so “Those People” rednecks in Alabama and Southern Missouri weren’t a big loss I’m sure to sick liberals. Ain’t that rite demoncat multiple ID liberal pseudo-“Redneck Convert?” Anyway, according to the liberals, we’ve seen (man-made) global warming cause an increase of tornadoes since 1950! Oh the horror! Hide in your bathtubs under your mattresses liberals! Stop driving and cooking and eating farmed animals liberals! WE GOTTA LIVE BACK IN CAVES AGAIN LIBERALS! Holy sheet! Look at that spike in 2004! Get all SCARED UP folks!

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/efscale/torn5004.jpg

That’s the NBC, CB.S., PMSNBC, CNN, Washington Compost, and New York Slimes version. Hey, the pseudo experts in the media didn’t whip this chart out. The idiots didn’t research the “facts” so I thought I’d help them out a little. Copyright Markus 2007.

But uh oh, what’s this? No major increase in massive “The Day After Tomorrow Al Sore” Alpharetta soccermom SUV Tahoe-induced tornadoes? One would think if tornadoes are increasing in frequency due to man’s activities, so would the increase of power of said tornadoes at the same time.

Surely one increase would give birth to another in the Al Sore’s and liberals’ womb, Mother Nature. Surely Mother Nature doesn’t do things half-assed. Hey, polar bears are being stranded on melting Arctic icebergs overnight for God’s sake. At least, that’s what the liberals like Sore are telling us. At least, that’s what the Sore & Co. told us about hurricanes after the 2005 season and Katrina.

Then of course, we had Hurricane season 2006. HARK? No hurricanes hit the US all year then, let alone Katrina’s sister never showing up for the party? Anyway, why not an increase of the power of tornadoes? Well hells bells. If it allegedly works for hurricanes, why should it not work for tornadoes? Hhmmm…

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/tornado/tornadotrend.gif

Let’s see if any of you genius statistical liberal experts can plot an ID trend line on that graph. Go ahead you over-estrogened scared little liberals. Hide under your beds from Mother Nature just like you tell Conservatives to hide from islamofascist terrorism under the bed which you don’t perceive as a threat.

And like you sick anti-success liberals say in one way from the opposite of my vantage, keep your neoMarxist anti-capitalist bedwetting pro-UN “man made global warming” wet pinko panties out of my hamper, out of my gas tank, out of my stove, and out of my HVAC. Scaredyassed pansie liberals. Only a liberal wussqueef would be scared of man-made global warming over some islamoterrorist slug that would kill the innocent all in the name of Mohammed. Sick liberals.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 8:53 AM | Link to this

How many times have we heard limpwristed liberal demoncat pantywastes on this blog squeal like stuck RATs when the government gives money to farmers? Well surprise, surprise, surprise. Nanny Pelosovich is touting transferring some money meant for Iraq to farmers.

All together now, let’s see what those cult members in the Party Of The Permanently Miserable will have to say about this:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-pelosi0307mar03,0,179527.story?coll=orl-news-headlines-state

By Markus

March 3, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this

Uh oh. EU to miss global warming goal. Just think, the UN and limpwristed liberal Gorebots want the US to sign an agreement where our companies will be heavily fined (that’s taxed for you liberals in Midtown) if we don’t meet an agreed upon goal.

So, if we miss the target by 2 degrees, it don’t make a sh!t whether sunspots, deep sea thermal vents, and cow colons had a flareup. We ALL will pay. You think those companies are NOT going to pass along their being robbed to us?

This is another example of a sickness of the disease of liberalism. Do whatever FEELS good, aftermaths be damned. Sick liberals.

http://www.alertnet.org/printable.htm?URL=/thenews/newsdesk/L02253037.htm

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 9:17 AM | Link to this

Markus @ 8:24 and Danish at LuckoBoring last nite: As a follow up to your ID jacker/ multiple ID comments, some time ago at cartoon boy’s blog a visitor, or “newcomer” so to speak, started to complain about my use of italics in my posts, his whining started one day out of the blue and lasted several. Trying to be helpful, as always, I told this person to turn their monitor on it’s side whenever they encountered italics in their reading.

My point being, after just a few days of this whining, the blog removed the use of italics and bolding, I guess because of this “newcomer’s” complaining.

The strange thing about it, this “newcomer” was a really odd character, much like Polly, Andi/e, Pinko Racist, America’s Pointy Hat Wearing Pooh Bah, Blackadder and all the other nonsense this these blogs are disgustingly infested with. Does this person, this “newcomer” work for the AJC (as Danish mused)?

I can almost guarantee that it works at the Urinal, think about it. If you were running this blog and wanted it to be a sane, normal place that people could discuss issues in a thoughtful, coherent manner, would you not just eliminate this Polly “newcomer” and be done with it?

Tell me if I’m wrong, if this person acted on the street like it does on this blog, would it not be thrown in the back of a squad car and pummeled on the way to jail?

So what, pray tell, makes the anonymity of this blog a cover for such behavior?

Working for the Atlanta Journal?

Has compromising pictures of Cynthia Tucker engaged sociopathic activities?

Is this “newcomer” really Jay Kookman? Why doesn’t he start his own pinko blog and harass the participant’s over there?

There is something really odd about this, Wooten seems normal but for some reason doesn’t mind having a festering disease ridden open sore attached to his blog like some filthy leech.

What gives, Jim?

By Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

March 3, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this

Somebody is looking for your popsicle @ 5:56 JohnD.

Mahabas is an equine bloodline, Arab.

He’s looking to breed with you or cut off your head.

Libruls come in two varieties; oversexed horses arses & terrorist sympathizers.

Warning!!!!Warning!!!!Warning!!!!

By GodHatesTrash

March 3, 2007 9:27 AM | Link to this

Sorry to hear about your tornado problems this week - it seems like every year hundreds of people are killed by tornadoes in Dicksea, and there are hundreds of dollars of damage.

God must be very p** off at you trash.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 9:29 AM | Link to this

What is it with sick liberals and stalking Conservatives? Check this lib out who has been stalking Michelle Malkin. He’s got his own leftwingnut blog.

http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2007/03/02/look-who-loves-me/

One of my favorite comments about the pic from a sick liberal:

“I’m just worried that if you keep standing that close to pure evil, you’ll turn into a hermit crab.”

Isn’t that nice? Isn’t that just like a sick liberal to say anyone who doesn’t share their horseass neoStalinist ideology is “evil?”

But here’s the stalkerboy in action at a George Allen event. Click through these for a Class A example of the disease of liberalism and the clown I linked to at the top. Liberal freaks.

http://fredericksburg.com/News/Web/2006/102006/1031allen/index2_html?qstart=1

By GodHatesTrash

March 3, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this

“festering disease ridden open sore”

Andi/e commenting on her mother or Bi Danish?

Sick stupid redneck trash w******* is what s/he is.

By Just sayin'

March 3, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this

Coincidence? I think not. Should be interesting?

Run Hillary, run!!

More on the hero

By time for the truth

March 3, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this

just wanted to say jolly well done to Ann Coulter for summing up the snake oil slimy leftist cut and run gutless worthless white trash trial lawyer beaten in 04 in his own state Edwards.

I see the hateful mental midget bigot dean the irrelevant unhinged scream can’t take a little joke … he can puke up limitless anti-GOP poison - but when someone hands back just a tiny bit of pointed black humour Dean ‘the should have been aborted dogturd’ gets all uppity.

WELL DONE ANN!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,256239,00.html

By Markus

March 3, 2007 9:47 AM | Link to this

WD-

When you told that liberal candyass to stop b***’ and turn his monitor on it’s side when he sees italics, thanks for the laugh dude. Now I’ve got coffee all over my monitor.

By PinkosHateEveryone

March 3, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this

Sorry to hear about your malaria problems this week - it seems like every year hundreds of thousands of children are killed by misquitos in Africa, and there are millions of damage. Bet you’d like some DDT, ha!

Pinkos must be very pis-sed off at you trash.

By GOP Pack of Jackals

March 3, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this

Markanus and Andi/e’s favorite website

Stupid cowards.

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this

ATC,

Ahh, the typical left winger, limited vocabulary and hiding behind his keyboard. I imagine you are one of the rational, well-adjusted ATCs to whom we are forced to entrust our safety in the air. You must work in Kentucky where the ATC does not know a runway from a taxiway.

The fact is that if you need a union to protect your job then your skills must be suspect.

You sound more like an “athletic supporter” than someone who has actually stepped upon a playing field.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this

Thanks for the link TFTT. That’s hilarious. Of course, the sick liberal sewer RATs hav no problems using homosexual epithets to insults Conservatives on this blog, so I don’t know why that p.o.s. Howard Scream has his pretty pink thong in a wad.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this

Looks like we got the diseased gutter RAT back on the street again today. What a pathetic disgusting liberal pig from hell. Waste.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

Nobody clicks on your pathetic links, you liberal ID-bastardizing wussqueef. Waste.

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

Warning,

I was curious about his use of the Marhaba term - do you suppose he actually was trying to say Wahabi?

No one is more blind than he who refuses to see the terrorists in the Mosque.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

I heard that after the islamofascist murderer bomber tried to get Cheney, a few diseased liberal monkeys over on muffingtonpost.com got in trouble. One colon polyp liberal said something to the effect of “better they kill him over there so we won’t have to here.” That’s good stuff. I hope that sewer RAT liberal got one hell of a rude awakening and a LONG time of inconvenience. It couldn’t have happened to a nicer group of miserable @ssholes.

By Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

March 3, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

JohnD; This marhaban terrorist is about as educated as a suicide bomber.

Sitting around waiting for someone else to tell them what to do.

An uneducated, helpless democrat.

By time for the truth

March 3, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this

My pleasure Markus. Glad you enjoyed the obvious laugh about Edwards’ fa- ggotry. Edwards is a sick joke … he wont/cant win … lives in al alBOre sized mansion guzzling eco whacko levels of energy and yet endlessly talks about helping poor folks and hangs out with blue collar union types desperately looking for non-existent votes!!

the sick anal obsessive id stalker hasn’t yet targeted you for endless homo stalking posts all week long … but the fact that it “steals” my clever and witty banter/patter almost everday shows its paying attention to at least some factual and logical commentaries!!

even funnier is the hilarious truth about the giant hypocrite alBOre - as was mercilessly exposed by Rush yesterday. His worthless phoney “carbon credits” are a liberal scam which the alBOre makes money from, literally buying them from himself!!

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030207/content/01125102.guest.html

By @@

March 3, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this

Jim:

You’ve been in the Carribean all week and I waited…..

I waited for the replacement writer who was supposed to fill in for you.

Was he a liberal who didn’t show up for work or what?

Kinda like the Democrats in congress. They continue to disappoint their anti-war fanatics.

Between the perverbial “rocks” (left-wing extremists) and the “hard place” (doing what’s right - support funding for our troops).

I’m enjoying watching them squirm, but I wanted to read your replacement.

Have a safe trip home Jim.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this

Case exhibit #16,773 of liberal demoncat hypocrisy. During the Clintoon years, we were all told to lay of their kid, Chelsea. “Don’t drag Chelsea into her parent’s politics” we were told by the holier-than-thou liberal RATs. Ok, no problem. I actually agreed with that then and agree with it now.

But uh-oh. Along comes Rudy Guiliani as a presidential candidate. Well, he’s a Republican, so all gloves are off. Even if he has some liberal leanings socially, he’s still one of “those people.” A Republican.

So guess what? The liberal gutter trash at the New York Slimes starts inquiring about his kids and spouting about his “bitter divorce” as the Slimes put it (like how in the hell many divorces end with kisses and a hug goodbye… ASSININE LIBERALS).

This is the same liberal hellhole that loves to print stories about the failings of the traditional American family, women choosing to live without a man, etc. Now suddenly these liberal colon polyps at the Slimes are suddenly concerned about Rudy’s personal family issues? Now it’s ok to talk about a politician’s children? Effin’ hypocritical liberal gutter RATs. Filthy vermin.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/03/us/politics/03rudy.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

azcents? and—“hunger in humans is cured, except when individuals make bad choices with food stams and grocery money.”

Hey. Don’t you got you no proof-readers at AJC?

I’m not talking about the ideological slant that forgets that if you wanna eat cheap and fast, you’re gonna eat fat. I’m talking about the actual L-E-T-T-E-R-S and stuff you’re printing here.

By Ann Coulter

March 3, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this

It would be great if Rudi and Edwards were to debate each other in drag.

Yes the Republican frontrunner dresses in drag and attends homo parades. LOL. Get ‘em Rudi.

By @@

March 3, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this

I am shocked, SHOCKED I say. Well, not really. It never ceases to amaze me where Democrats place their priorities.

It sure doesn’t seem to be on transportation safety during the war on terror.

That’s when the Senate is expected to vote on two amendments.

One, sponsored by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., would strike the labor rights provision that inspired the veto threat. DeMint, Bush and enough Republicans to sustain a veto say collective bargaining rights would prevent the Transportation Security Administration from making instant personnel changes during an emergency.

According to DeMint, the debate was about adding more members and dues to the labor unions’ membership lists and money for their lawyers, another traditionally Democratic constituency.

He noted that unionizing the more than 45,000 TSA screeners would give labor unions a windfall of millions of dollars in dues which in turn would translate into more campaign dollars for Democrats. For those and logistical reasons, DeMint urged his colleagues to support eliminating the provision and killing McCaskill’s amendment.

I find the Democrats’ political plays of “fast and loose” with our national security disgusting, JUST DISGUSTING.

I like being able to bold over here Jim. ml won’t let us do that at his place.

By getalife

March 3, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

I have been to all the wingnut blogs asking why in the world the scandal at Walter Reed is not posted.

Lets face it folks, the wingnuts do not support the troops period.

By Ann Coulter

March 3, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

BTW, I can’t wait to see what Ball Gown Rudi picks for the Inaugural Ball.

Probably some hot cleavage showing, fire red dress.

(I’ll be wearing slacks.)

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

What’s up with Ann Coulter?

I’ve been called a f*-got by you libs thousands of times.

And I know I’m ten times the man that John Edwards is, little poof daddy redneck, haha.

You pinkos don’t like others to be cutting in on your hate?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By getalife

March 3, 2007 11:46 AM | Link to this

Ah, some real Americans fighting against the Nafta superhighway and the North American Union.

There is no security with open borders and Mexican trucks running unchecked thru this country.

This is w’s little way of screwing the country and idiots here cheer him on.

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this

What’s up with Walter Reed?

I can remember not too long ago, them folks down in New Orleans booked from their hospital leaving hundreds of the crippled and infirm to face the flood waters on their own.

I don’t know about you but I would pick the mold over the underwater screaming.

Maybe it’s just me?

But you two faced pinkos jump bad in the United States as-s over some contrived bullsh-it while you do things hundreds of times worse on your own little world.

If it makes you feel good.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By getalife

March 3, 2007 11:53 AM | Link to this

Thanks for proving my point Andy.

Wingnuts,

Geez.

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

As a Liberal Colon Polyp who enjoys listening to my ideological opposites, I must mention that while I heard Limbaugh referring to the Clinton kid in a real ugly manner, years ago, while we had librul radio in this town I never heard the Bush kids savaged. And you know, they would not be worthy of such an ill-wind, despite stuff like this:

snip-

Guess what Jenna Bush is getting for Christmas? The love and awe of some Buenos Aires guy in a trucker cap who maybe makes $400 a month. Hooray for romance! It knows no boundaries!

Wonkette operative “Bill” has mysterious business ties with Argentina, which is why he keeps up with whatever the Bush Twins are doing down there. He translated a chunk of this article that reveals way too much about Ramiro González Palazzo and how impressed he is that a woman is allowed to have a credit card.

(I don’t read Wonkette, though I do actually live on the tubes, but I have to wonder where the right is going with this? Do you want to sling mud, or do you want to make this country better?)

By Ann Coulter

March 3, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Do you think Rudi should ditch the dresses and make-up when he campaigns in the South?

I think it would be a big mistake for him to wear dresses and high heels. Ralph Reed endorsement or not, it won’t play well in Dixie. Come to think of it Dixie would be a good drag name for him…..

Introducing the next President and first drag queen President of the USA… Ms Dixie Guiliani!!!!

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this

Speaking of Ann Coulter (The real one, not the fraud^^^).

I don’t think that Ann Coulter calling Edwards a “f*” was the best move on her part (“silk pony” and “Breck Girl” have the same effect with a tad more subtlety) but it should be noted that the Left love to hint that AC is a Lesbian. She is correct that using the “f*” word unleashes demands for immediate enrollment in re-education camp and apologies for “hate speech”.

One could say that she leveled the playing field. Here’s a trip down AJC memory lane with our own “Dirty Sanchez” who calls Ann Coulter a “Carpet muncher”.

As for Rudi appearing in Gay parades, as New York’s miraculously effective mayor, he appeared in any parade that invited him, and did a skit where he appeared in drag. BFD.

Ever hear of Harvard’s Hasty Pudding Awards?

Dressing in drag is part of their shtick, but since their an elite Ivy League institution…

later folks…

By getalife

March 3, 2007 12:01 PM | Link to this

Lets recap.

Wingnuts do not support the troops and do not support the country.

Prove me wrong wingnuts.

Geez.

By LMAO

March 3, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

Dixie Guiliani……LMAO!!!

By Ann Coulter

March 3, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this

The battle of ‘08…..

Female impersonator Hilary Clinton

VS

Female impersonator Rudi Guiliani

Should be a great drag race!

By PoofoDull's Tiny Testes

March 3, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

I have never heard anyone accuse (M)Ann Coulter of lesbianism.

There is a difference between transexualism and homosexuality - you of all people should know that Bi Danish.

Since you suffer from both.

By getalife

March 3, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

Man Coulter, singlemanhandily destroyed Romney’s chance of being President.

Nice work man,

Geez.

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

Yo, Atlanta. This is NOT the way to oppose Guiliani,

The guy has a closet full of black-shirts, but he’s not dumb er nothin’.

He’s actually the best candidate on the horizen, I can’t tell you how much it hurts to say that.

But sometimes, the truth hurts.

By getalife

March 3, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

More trouble for man at the the hate convention

Geez.

By Pillowbiters for Bush

March 3, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this

We like Rudi too.

Although Ann is a better top.

By Ann Coulter

March 3, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

You stupid liberals didn’t even hear my next comment. Stop complainig until you hear the full story. I got a standing ovation for this line also…..

“I was going to have a few comments for Vice President Cheney’s Daughter also, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the words ‘pregnant Bull-d**,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Mary.”

By JohnD Dropped His Popsicle

March 3, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

JohnD,

I’m curious. If you see a public school teacher, secularist, air traffic controller, Muslim, and gay in the same room, which one would you shoot first?

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5z5-EYaALE

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this

Doom would shoot all except the air traffic controller, unless he was gay.

By Angry, Tuff, Butch, Perky

March 3, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

That’s me, Bi Danish. And my lover Andi/e. She’s more femme than me, granted.

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

Dear johnddroppedhispop,

why are we not getting along?

You know and I know, that WE, the peps, are not being well served, We do know that, don’t we?

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 1:17 PM | Link to this

Doom,

Interesting. I’d shoot the ATCs first. They want taxpayers to pay them for playing video games all day. F-ing union communists. They’re worse than the Wahabis.

You do know about the Wahabis, don’t you?

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 1:22 PM | Link to this

Doom has never heard of the Wahabis. Are they some punka$$ group of liberals?

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 1:23 PM | Link to this

Those gosh darn islamodfacist liberal commies really make me mad.

Even though they’re are the people who live on my street.

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this

Hey Doom,

Are you violent, unstable and reckless? If not, what do you say we hook up at the community center for a little one-one-one? If so, what do you say we hook up at the community center for a little one-one-one?

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this

Oops. “one-one-one” should have been “one-on-one”. Silly me.

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this

Hey JohnD,

Are you gay,ignorant,and stupid? If so, why don’t you kiss my a$$?

Get lost homocrat!

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

What the heck is going on on this forum?

By Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

March 3, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

JohnD; Can you hear the desperation in these liberal wahabi voices? If the dems can’t get their hands on that union money so they can support these lazy a* dem voters, the liberal wahabis will be blowing themselves up right here on wooten’s blog.

Desperation is ugly and messy.

It’s their existence they’re fighting.

SHOW THEM YOUR MONEY JohnD.

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this

This blog is totally idiotic. Doom does not have the time or the patience to sit here and communicate about nothing.

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

Doom has to come in and save JimWooten’s dumba$$ blog:

George Bush visited the victims of the tornado today. That is for every homo democrat that criticized him for not moving fast enough for Katrina. Good Job Bush!!!

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 2:02 PM | Link to this

Dear Lord Doom,

Welcome. I hear you are the new voice of my opponents.

I know that the US dollar is in trouble. And I know it’s partially because of YOUR kind,.

I could never say it’s totally your fault because I DON’T LIE. at least on purpose.

But it’s happening. That’s reality.

What do you think?

By tribalecho

March 3, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this

Ah, I see. Even though I would be the last one to encourage violence, I can not help but notice that Lord Doom just backed down to John D.

Ps. I think everybody should just go home now,

By @@

March 3, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

Whoooaaaaa nellie.

Are Danes supposed to feed the hands that bite?

[“The idea of an alternative society is good,” said Berit Larsen, 57, as she watched the demonstration pass. “We need to have room for everyone, but the violence we have seen is not what I consider an alternative way for society.”] (http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/03/03/D8NKRSS00.html)

The building has been viewed as free public housing by young squatters since the 1980s. Authorities say it has also been a staging point for numerous left-wing demonstrations that turned violent in recent years.

INSANE!

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 2:16 PM | Link to this

tribalecho,

At community centers, people get together and play basketball(on on one) not to fight. That idiot JohnD was speaking in reference to that. Or he might have been making a fa$$ot pass, which is how Doom interpreted it. Either way, he can take a flying leap over a mine shaft!!

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

Spelling correction - Make that “they’re” not “their” at 11:59.

PoFo aka Political Foreskin,

You know you’re nuts, right?,

I linked to one of your many alter egos, “Dirty Sanchez”, calling Ann Coulter a “carpet muncher”. Allusions to AC’s sexuality are made frequently, and denying it is perfectly idiotic. Just look at all the attempts to do the same with me^^^by idiots like you and your comrades. You do it with me but not with Ann! Right. /sarc.

Since Co*ck night at the Star Bar is your thang, I don’t doubt that you are the resident “expert” on transexuals.

I ain’t one of them so don’t get your hopes up, sweetie. It must be very lonely out there for people like you.

By Lord Doom

March 3, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

What the hell is going on with Luckovich’s Blog? There are nothing but losers over here.

By @@

March 3, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this

Lord Doomesbury:

If I might ask:

By Lord Doom March 3, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this

This blog is totally idiotic. Doom does not have the time or the patience to sit here and communicate about nothing.

Could you possibly spend your valuable time being an idiot somewhere else?

I took your statement as a promise that you were leaving.

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this

Nut up:

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, House Democratic Caucus chairman, had written Gonzales two letters suggesting that he name Carol Lam, fired as U.S. attorney in San Diego, as an outside counsel to continue her pursuit of the Duke Cunningham case. Asked by Melissa Charbonneau of the Christian Broadcasting Network about this column’s report that Gonzales did not respond, Gonzales said: “I think that the American people lose if I spend all my time worrying about congressional requests for information, if I spend all my time responding to subpoenas.”

These two faced pinkos don’t deserve any respect and they get no respect.

Game playing children, in a league way over their empty pointed little heads.

They must like to be spanked by the adults.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

Been away since 10:15 post but I see the Liar Liberal, too fearful to use his own name, has been posting under mine. Much like his cut-and-run Dems in Congress he is unable to stand up and speak for himself (herself?).

And the numbskull refers to the right as “wingnuts”.

By JohnD

March 3, 2007 3:21 PM | Link to this

Warning!,

I hear you brother. Any 12 year-old can work an air traffic control tower. Those union f—ks are a bunch of whining pu$$ies. I don’t care if they do work long shifts on little sleep. I say fire their violent and unstable a*******es and replace them with sixth graders. Kids will work for $1/hour and like it.

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this

@@,

It’s also possible that the Doomster is PoFo, who is the AJC’s Lon Chaney - The Man of a Thousand Faces

By JohnD(the actual)

March 3, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this

I have never felt the need to carry a weapon but after reading the posts of the uneducated liberal using my name I will have to rethink that postion.

On the other hand I do not think I would need any help to handle that jerk. Go use your profanity and obnoxious thoughts on someone else.

By @@

March 3, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

Getalife (Union Negotiator/Lover of “Wingnuts”:

Would you please take a pill; put on your blue T-Shirt, bermudas, and put your feet up on the sofa.

Hell, you can even wear socks with your sandals. Black OR White, whichever you prefer.

Me? I go bare.

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 3:52 PM | Link to this

Despite all the talk of “alternative” fuels, some 80% of the energy that the world produces today comes from carbon-based fuels. Barring cold fusion or some other miracle technology, that ratio won’t change much for decades to come. That means, in turn, that any stringent CO2 cap would inevitably have serious economic costs. We doubt voters will elect politicians who tell them the cost of reducing their “carbon footprint” is more blackouts or a lower standard of living. And in any case China is putting up a new coal-fired plant every week, raising emissions that will overwhelm whatever reductions cap-and-trade would yield in the U.S. The emerging alliance of business and environmental special interests may well prove powerful enough to give us cap-and-trade in CO2. It would make Hollywood elites feel virtuous, and it would make money for some very large corporations. But don’t believe for a minute that this charade would do much about global warming.

The big problem is that the libs will never tell you what they have planned, they’ll just keep scheming until they get enough power, then one day they’ll send the cops to your house to make you cut the lights off.

It won’t be long after that before they regulate how much you can breathe.

And they will check on your as-s too.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By JohnD(the actual)

March 3, 2007 3:56 PM | Link to this

Unions, the great saviors according to the liberals here.

So, a little history. The auto unions forced American car manufacturers to pay them significantly more than worth to build a shoddy car. Now, GM and Ford are on the verge of bankruptcy and plant closings have put thousands of union members on the streets but we still hear the libs singing the praises of unions.

Are all liberals and union members possibly so dull as to miss the handwriting on the wall or are they just too uneducated to be able to read?

Unions, like the sweat shops the unions were formed to fight, are out of touch with reality. Drugs, sex and crime are small potatos compared to the income organized crime generates from the unions. The members are simply duped into believing the union is good for them.

Gosh, a Liberal being duped just seems so… plausible.

By JohnD Dropped His Popsicle

March 3, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this

JohnD,

It’s your asinine anecdotes about people you know nothing about and your desperate attempts to inspire ethnic hatred that’s vulgar. If you think World War III is the answer, then put on the uniform and get your dumba$$ over on the front lines. Otherwise, you’re just another chicken$hit who talks big, but lets others risk life and limb to satisfy your bigoted sensibilities.

By @@

March 3, 2007 4:16 PM | Link to this

You know Buy Danish, we could really join the wild and crazy world of the liberals.

The Doom is captive in the AJC’s Manor of Liberalism. He’s seen the light and wants desperately to free himself, but he can’t find a blogging job anywhere else.

He’s too dumb, nobody else will have him.

Oh crap! Now I’m beginning to sound like a liberal.

Stranger things have happened. Lots of conservatives WERE liberals until we came to our senses, began using our brains, and matured.

I read somebody’s post here regarding “carbon credits”. Semper was explaining them to me the other day. No matter how he framed it, it came up as a “scam” to me.

Semper being, very astute in business and his ability to make money wants to set himself up in “the business”.

“If the Democrats are dumb enough to buy into this fraud, then I’m smart enough to exploit them and make a fortune” he said.

By yellowfaced liberal

March 3, 2007 4:28 PM | Link to this

Oh why don’t you go to hell Popsicle leftist alias thief. Everyone knows your shenanigans here day in and day out and it’s getting a little long in the tooth. You sit here and lecture others about being on this blog often yet you sit here and spam all over the place with your twisted liberal bullsh-t all day and stealing other people’s identities. What’s your major malfunction, numbnuts? While your at it bigshot liberal, why don’t you go over to Pakistan and get Osama for us, o-tay? Otherwise sit down and shut the hell up about where Osama is. Nobody really cares about you leftist thoughts on Iraq either. You don’t really care. You just like sticking things on Bush. GFY scumbag.

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this

@@,

I just read your link to the Copenhagen riots. They’re not as bad as the Cartoon Riots, but they have a bit in common in the sense of a “right” to outrage and…riot.

When I lived in New York the Bishop of the Episcopal Church was Paul Moore, and I credit him for he driving me out of the Episcopal Church.

I attended his last sermon before he retired at Grace Episcopal Church. I was still a Democrat in those days but my jaw-dropped when I heard him talk about how the squatters had all these rights. He participated in demonstrations against the police when they tried to evict them and encouraged us to do the same.

He was the ultimate limosine liberal as you can see from his Bio..

Note how all his Chicken Little predictions of doom were proven wrong by the great Rudy Guiliani.

They always are.

By @@

March 3, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this

Chilly Willy Lover @ 4:09:

I’ve seen nowhere that JohnD mentioned ethnicity. You’re kind of thinking absolutely amazes me.

What does ethnicity have to do with union members?

Are you just naturally assuming that ethnic groups are who he’s referring to. Is there a reason why you would assume that?

Has your Democratic party taught you that ethnic groups can’t make it on their own. I think they can.

I HATE what the Democratic party has done to people’s ability to think.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

These sick liberal RATs have gone to flucking far!! The audacity of neomarxist queefs defending commie air-traffic controllers MAKES ME SICK!

TFTT showed you sewer RATs how to properly stroke yourself and the party of hate still spews their hate. PATHETIC FREAKS!! Check out my conservative hard stroke technique!!

up…down…up…SEWER RATS…down…up…LIBORAT FREAKS…down…AAAAAARRRRGH!!!!

I ENJOYED THAT!! Pathetic RATs. spit.

By @@

March 3, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

Danish:

I’ve always been a big fan of Rudy’s. When he committed himself to turn NYC around, I thought….NO CAN DO. I was thinking like a liberal.

And to think, all that he accomplished was done while cutting government entitlements.

How, oh how did those poor incompetents make it without them.

They must have been shown the writing on the wall. The “BIG RED LETTERS” of Giuliani and everyone is better for having read them?

Ain’t life grand?

By GodHatesTrash

March 3, 2007 4:56 PM | Link to this

JohnD, BiDanish, Lady Markus, Andi/e - what a bunch of worthless loudmouthed flatulent cowardly trash.

By Curly Girl

March 3, 2007 5:01 PM | Link to this

The Sailor said Andi/e, you’re a fine girl…

That’d be me, Andi/e - I will not serve in the military, but I will service them.

By getalife

March 3, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Lots of hate up in here.

Must be that hate convention.

Mrs Edwards responds to that thing you call Ann:

“Although her words did not hurt us, they may have hurt some in the gay community. We are all sick and tired of anyone supporting or applauding or introducing hate words into the national dialogue, tired of people thinking that words that cause others pain are fair game.

John gave a graduation speech at NC State several years ago, and in it he said that none of us can stand by when words of bigotry and division are used. It is only when the rest of us stand up and say that this is not acceptable that we drum out the hate-mongers from amongst us.

Now it is our turn to drown out the hate. Find a way — whether it is contribution here that sends a message to Miss Coulter and those who applauded her (which, of course, I prefer) or whether it is a statement on this blog or others or all of the above — but please find a way not to sit silent in acceptance. It doesn’t change until we say we will not be silent when this happens.”

Very first lady like.

Hate breeds hate and your children are listening to your hate.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

Wow our disgusting liberal demoncat multiple ID-jacker has wasted all day having fun with itself and Conservative IDs on this blog, even mine right ^^above^^. Note to liberal demoncat: you can’t even COPY SOMEBODY worth two Boyett sh!ts. Pathetic gutter RAT.

If anyone wants to know how pathetic and mentally unstable sick liberal FREAKS like our resident ID thief scab from the neoStalinist left are, see my post from this morning blog. It’s a real eye-opener to the disease of liberalism.

Anyway, I was out enjoying the day car shopping. Yep, while bums sleep under bridges, I’m going to blow a massive amount of MY MONEY on a new car. SOMEBODY has to work and spend money to keep this great economy humming. To hell with every last one of you liberal socialist diseases and the jackasses you rode in on. Sick jackals.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this

Awe. Poor Breck Boy Edwards got him weetle wiberal feewings hurt by something Ann Coulter said. Conservatives get nailed with gay epithets from the liberal neoMarxist pigs on the left here ALL THE TIME. EVEN TODAY.

So, in short, who gives a RAT’S @SS about Edwards.

By PinkosHateEveryone

March 3, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

Come on boys, get on those white robes, put your little pointy hat on top of your empty head, hide your face (most important cause we’re cowards) and let’s ride to that cross burning.

Just kidding, ever since they made them laws about lynching blacks and all that, the only people we can hate on, and we do have to hate on someone, are Christians and white folks.

Plus, they can’t stomp our as-ses like they need to be if we hide here in the internet.

We’re regular Eric Rudolphs, planting bombs on all the people we hate.

We like being cowards.

By JohnD(the actual)

March 3, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Popsicko,

I note you used a thesaurus for the first few words at 4:09 but quickly reverted to your usual profane rant.

I have never mentioned an ethnic group other than the Islamofacists who are out to kill us all - even you. Are you are unable to recognize the threat of Islam to the world? You should buy a burka - you will need it.

One of the traits of the delusional is to read meaning into statments and acts that no sane person would. Sound familiar?

Trashman,

No one you mentioned is near as loud and perverse as you. Your act is very tiresome.

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 5:26 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Bwahahaha. What phony outrage.

Did you read any of Mistress Amanda Marcotte’s (recently of the Edwards campaign) blog? Now that’s “hate speech” for ya.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:27 PM | Link to this

More bad news for Defeatocrat liberals in the war on islamofascist terrorism. It looks like we opened a can of wup@ss on a surgical operation in Afghanistan. It must really suck to always be on the wrong side of a war. Ain’t that right liberal defeatocrats?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/afghanistanus.html

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this

By getalife March 3, 2007 5:08 PM Mrs Edwards responds We are all sick and tired of anyone supporting or applauding or introducing hate words into the national dialogue, tired of people thinking that words that cause others pain are fair game.

Uh-huh:

What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit?- John Edward’s Blog

Yep.

I called Edwards a lot more than fa-ggot.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By @@

March 3, 2007 5:38 PM | Link to this

tribalecho:

In your contribution at 1:05, you were so eager to go after AC, that you conveniently overlooked the truth.

I, like this guy, am not a big fan of Ann Coulter, but she obviously knew what she was talking about and McKeown didn’t.

By Markus is Misinformed

March 3, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this

Markus,

It’s the political left that has been begging Bush to send more troops to Afghanistan.

It must really suck to always be on the wrong side of a war.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this

Awwweeee. Islamic nations only represent 13% of the world tourism business. Just what I always wanted to do was go to Riyadh and get my head sawed off. Or, perhaps Tehran where I can be held hostage. Or maybe Pakistan where I get blown up. Or wait, no, I’ve got the utlimate dream vacation in mind: Somalia!

Hell I’ve always wanted to visit somewhere where I’m hated because I own dogs, drink booze, eat pork, and don’t believe that Mohammed is my saviour.

Surely they can’t be scratching their heads wondering why they are at the bottom of the tourism industry (among other things).

http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=456208

By WootenDull

March 3, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this

Bad news for the libs in Iraq too:

“We are seeing more people beginning to challenge the insurgents,” said Marine Brig. Gen. John Allen, who oversees units in the militant heartland west of Baghdad.

And the surge ain’t even started yet.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By @@

March 3, 2007 5:41 PM | Link to this

Markus:

Your ABC link didn’t get me anywhere.

Did it mention “where” the strike took place?

By Markus is Misinformed

March 3, 2007 5:42 PM | Link to this

Markus,

It’s the liberals who have been begging President “I don’t really think about bin Laden that much” Bush to send more troops to Afghanistan.

It must really suck to always be on the wrong side of a war.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:45 PM | Link to this

The Afghan attack link again:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/afghanistanus.html

By Metric Man

March 3, 2007 5:47 PM | Link to this

Intelligent, mature human beings:

Please rank these Wooten regulars in order of the dignity inherent in their Thinking Right screeds:

Markus Lord Doom TFTT

Extra credit will be given if you assign an interval- or ratio-scaled measure.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:48 PM | Link to this

I remember all those disgusting things liberal sewer RATs said about Cheney’s daughter and Jeff Gannon.

Now somebody ‘splain to me why I should give a three toilet flush turd what sick liberal demoncats think about what Ann Coulter said.

Damned pathetic hypocrites.

By JohnD Dropped His Popsicle

March 3, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

JohnD at 5:23,

If you feel that strongly about it, then here’s a link to point you in the right direction. You can shoot at Muslims all day, and they’ll even pay you for it.

http://www.goarmy.com/flindex.jsp

Go get ‘em tiger.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

ID poofer-

We want to win against islamofascism. You pansyasses on the left want to fold tent and run. Oh yeah, and like someone else said, now that your beloved RAT pack is in Congress, where are THEIR ideas on getting Osama? cricket chirp

Don’t EVEN go there, jackass.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:52 PM | Link to this

Damn, that link isn’t copying correctly here for some reason.

Let’s try this.

By Markus is Misinformed

March 3, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

Sorry for the second, nearly identical post. I received an error message on the first attempt. I thought it didn’t go through.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:54 PM | Link to this

Metric Man (et. al. aliases)-

Ratings can’t be accurate when liberals steal IDs around here. It’s tainted evidence. Nice try, clown.

By @@

March 3, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

If I may intrude on a conversation…

MiM at 5:42 is avoiding the whole truth. Liberals would love it if NATO forces dealt with all conflicts around the globe.

NATO forces are in Afghanistan supporting U.S. AND Canadian forces.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

Here’s that sick liberal stalker on video during a George Allen event. What the hell is WRONG with these sick liberals?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioWGWItOwvc&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flittlegreenfootballs%2Ecom%2Fweblog%2F

By @@

March 3, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this

Markus:

EXCELLENT!!! and thanks. I get most of my information from Stratfor. They said yesterday that Mullah Obaidullah Akhund, third senior leader of the Taliban was being questioned along with 4 others caught with him. They were all picked up March 1. This is March 3. You’ve gotta act fast.

They were hoping to find the location of Osama. Akhund is the kind that won’t strap a suicide belt, so maybe he gave up critical information to save his own behind. Him or one of the other cowards.

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 6:10 PM | Link to this

WootenDull,

Thanks for doing the work and digging out some of Edward’s Blogger’s words.

Can you imagine if Ms. Marcotte had said that about Mohammed?

The cartoon riots would have been gumdrops and lollipops in comparison.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 6:14 PM | Link to this

Disgusting sewer RATs on this blog MAKE ME SICK!!

I…AM…SO…PIST…OFF…RIGHT…NOW!!!!!!!

You filthy neomarxist pigs support the Democrit party of hate!!! I can’t wait until the day that I drive my new car over some homeless liboRAT freak!!!

GOD I HATE YOU ALL!!!!

up…down…up…LIBORAT FREAKS…down…up…sewer RAT queefs…down…AAAAARRRRGHHHHH!!!!

Now someone ‘splain where my NYSlimes is so I can wipe myself off!

By Markus

March 3, 2007 6:22 PM | Link to this

Nope liberal demoncat ID poofer, you can’t fool anyone, you sad little disgusting neoStalinist leftwingnut skank. God you are a freaking PATHETIC no life liberal sewer RAT freak from hell. You represent your filthy party well.

By Buy Danish

March 3, 2007 6:24 PM | Link to this

Interesting info on goracles’ hysteria -

Believe it or not, over the last century America’s major media have predicted an impending global climate crisis four different times – each prediction warning that entire countries would be wiped out or that lower crop yields would mean “billions will die.” In 1895, the panic was over an imminent ice age. Later, in the late 1920s, when the earth’s surface warmed less than half a degree, the media jumped on a new threat – global warming, which continued into the late 1950s. Then in 1975, the New York Times’ headline blared, “A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable.” Then in 1981 it was back to global warming, with the Times quoting seven government atmospheric scientists who predicted global warming of an “almost unprecedented magnitude.”

Today, to cover all their bases, much of the press is changing its terminology from “global warming” to “climate change” or “climate catastrophe.” That way they’re covered either way: If the world gets colder, global warming is still at fault.

By Markus

March 3, 2007 6:32 PM | Link to this

BD-

Man-made global warming is the biggest scandal lie to come from the limpwristed left since LBJ’s Great Society. These jackasses think if America won’t succumb to communism, they’ll make America pay anyway. It’s amazing those people on the jackal left can breed and raise kids.

By JohnD

March 4, 2007 8:19 AM | Link to this

Popsickle,

DELUSIONAL - put down the thesaurus and use the dictionary. Is that your picture following the definition?

You never address the issues. Are you denying the threat of Islam? If so how do explain the number of terrorist attacks around the world perpetrated by Islamic Fundamentalists. Are you really so dense you do not understand?

No wonder Marcus displays the frustration of dealing with you lightweights.

Poor John Edwards was called a name by a political commentator and that is all you shallow left wingers care about for a week. Oh, that and the fact the union members are continually striking themselves out of jobs and I think there is justice in their joblessness. Well, tooooooooo bad.

Name calling is all you do and when someone throws one back at you you cry in your corn flakes all day. Contribute something positive for a change, whoops I forgot you Lefties rely on the negative for all of your political rhetoric.

Pathetic!

By JohnD Dropped His Popsicle

March 4, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this

JohnD,

Some, if not most, terrorist plots broken up both here and in the U.K. might have succeeded if not for the help of honest, peace-loving Muslims. Many Muslim nations, including Iran, had provided support (logistical, intelligence or otherwise) in our efforts in Afghanistan. Bizarre rants from haters like you (straight from FrontPageMag, Washington Times, Rush Limbaugh and other such misinformation outlets) about Muslims help to create terrorists — not fight them. There’s a terrorist threat, but I don’t spit my venom on all who happen to share the same religion as some fundamentalist freaks any more than I attribute the f##ked-up comments of Pat Robertson to all Christians.

However, as I said before, if you want to fight World War III, I have no doubt that there’s a recruiting station near you — chickenhawk.

On your union bull$s**, the big three automakers are struggling because their cars are poor quality relative to the Japanese models. Also, management didn’t have the foresight to diversify their product lines, and as a result, they were caught off guard when gas prices began to rise rapidly and people started to be concerned about global warming.

Violent, unstable and reckless far right pricks like you aren’t content unless they demonize anybody who doesn’t look, act and think like them. You’ll absorb any misinformation directly into your bloodstream without digesting it first if it supports your ideology of selfishness, greed, gluttony and hate.

Pathetic!

By JohnD(the actual)

March 4, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

Popsickle,

Some, if not most…

Just another generalization from a liberal. ALL the terror attacks were the work of MUSLIMS, Islamofacists if you like, but the moderate Muslims are in power in Iraq now and all you Lefties want to scream is “Get out of Iraq”. Well which way do you want this to go? Support the moderates you tout or desert them?

To cite Iran as an example of a Muslim state with honor is disgraceful. No person with a brain can call their leader or their politics anything but insane.

The gas prices started to rise in the early 1970’s you dolt. There has been no “sudden increase” - the prices have been rising for over 30 years.

Aramco was pushed out of Saudi Arabia in 1979 and reported to Congress that oil reserves there were 110 billion barrels. Now, despite the fact there have been no major discoveries, Saudi Arabia claims to have a reserve of 260 billion barrels. Why you might ask - because OPEC ties allowed production to reserves. So oil prices will continue to go higher.

The American auto manufacturers have been paying workers over $50 an hour to do assembly line work. Not rocket science, but still they produce junk. Why is there an old adage about not buying a car built on Friday or Monday? Because the workers are either hung over or planning on becoming that way.

The unions priced the American cars out of the market. GM lost $1,500 on every car sold last year. Do the unions care? No, and they have never cared. “Just get me my money now” is their motto. Well, when the bond holders take over Ford and GM and all the stockholders are left out in the cold, do you think the union leaders are going to help? Again, NO!

Before you start the liberal song and dance about “It serves those dirty capitalist stockholders right”, just remember the stockholders are Mom and Pop America. Retirement plans, mutual funds and individuals own a majority of the shares.

When these companies are wounded and perhaps lost what do you think will happen to the price of your little rice burner? That’s right, you poor economically dull liberal, the price will rise, rise, and rise.

You Liberals live with the idea government can save you from everything when the reality is that government does almost nothing but cause economic problems. Raising taxes has never, ever balanced the budget. A hot economy is what balances the budget and that is the result of money in the hands of business which then creates jobs, income and tax revenue.

Trying to teach you the way the world works is becoming as tedious as reading your nonsense. You are driven by a socialist theory that has never succeeded and by a “head in the sand” defense plan that results in the rest of your body exposed to destruction.

Go back to dailykos.com with the rest of the sick left.