Thinking Right

By Mid-South Philosopher

January 26, 2007 05:29 PM | Link to this

Good afternoon, Jim,

I didn’t see this posted until 5:30 P.M.!

Let me add another subject for “Thinking Right…Friday.”

I am no fan of Dick Cheney’s, and I approved of Wolf Blitzer’s grilling of him about Iraq on CNN this past Wednesday. However, when Blitzer got into the issue of Mary Cheney, the Vice President’s pregnant, gay daughter, he crossed the line.

If Blitzer was a politician and running for office, I would go into his district and campaign against him!

Unfortunately, he is an example of the post-modern journalist. When doing a “news” story, instead of seeking the story, uncovering the truth, and getting at reality, he wants to mold the news by editorializing within the interview process. I thought the Vice President restrained himself quite well. I felt like smacking Blitzer myself.

In The Situation Room, “Wolfie” should stick to straight reporting and leave the editorializing to Jim and me! Of course, he could always contribute to the Thinking Right blog.

By Joe L

January 26, 2007 05:47 PM | Link to this

When you belong to a group seeking to deny rights to another group which your own daughter - who has campaigned for her father openly thus placing herself squarely in the public politically arena - belongs to, the issue IS fair game.

By getalife

January 26, 2007 06:05 PM | Link to this

Mid-South Philosopher,

Um, the gop position on marriage may have something to do with that question don’t ya think?

Check out this hilarious clip from Jon Stewert to rebut your outrage

Geez.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 08:05 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush’s father accused the news media of “personal animosity” toward his son. “It’s one thing to have an adversarial … relationship — hard-hitting journalism — it’s another when the journalists’ rhetoric goes beyond skepticism and goes over the line into overt, unrelenting hostility and personal animosity,” former President George Bush said.

We’ll see how much the libs value the old man’s opinion today, won’t we?

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said yesterday that Congress’ push to oppose President Bush’s troop increase in Iraq “emboldens the enemy” and undercuts the commanders in the field. Sen. Edward “Swimmer” Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, called Mr. Gates’ statement “a desperate attempt” to bolster the president’s policy.

I can think of a better use for the phrase “desperate attempt,” like what was not given to save Mary Jo Kopechne’s life.

2 charged in school scandal involving students, troops. A South Carolina National Guardsman and a former high school cheerleading coach allegedly had sex with students, They do not face sex charges because the teens were old enough to consent.

Old enough to consent, eh?

Because all the students involved were 16 or older, none of the adults will be charged because the teens were old enough to consent under state law, according to the sheriff’s reports.

How quickly the lib’s story changes when there is a teacher involved:

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The top three Republicans in the House assailed Rep. Mark Foley Saturday over his e-mails to a teenage male page and said his resignation was not enough.

Remember that?

What else do you libs apologize for or cover up?

Military alters account of 4 GI deaths in Iraq U.S. first reported that 5 soldiers were killed in raid by terrorists in disguise. It now admits 4 were captured and taken away to be shot in another province. Urinal Front Page, so proud aren’t you?

Huh, so they weren’t read their 5th amendment rights, taken to their lawyers and freed after a few hours?

Like we do with the killers of innocent women and children, every day?

I thought tip toeing around Iraq would earn us “some respect in the world?”

Just more liberal BS, as usual.

Minority Leader John A. Boehner of Ohio on Thursday identified Iraq as “first and foremost” why Republicans lost their congressional majority in November’s midterm elections. Mr. Bush told members he understands the war poses a political difficulty for them. “That reminds people he really does get it,” Mr. Putnam said.

In other words the Republicans could immediately improve their domestic political opportunities if they abandoned the troops and the war on Islamic Fascism, like the democrats have.

But they don’t.

America is more important to them then some stupid political office. It’s called Courage of Conviction, which is something a lib knows nothing about.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Mid-South Philosopher

January 27, 2007 08:16 AM | Link to this

Joe L,

You would expect the Vice President’s daughter to campaign for Hillary!?!

Mary Cheney, were she not the VP’s daughter, would be an inconsequential.

Getalife,

It just seems to me (and remember that I am NOT a Cheney fan) that Blitzer, by going after a purely personal situation that is not going to save one life in Iraq or make the country one iota stronger or safer here at home, made himself and the professional of journalism look petty. In fact, one could reason (though it would be a hell-of-a stretch) that Blitzer was being anti-gay in his inquiry.

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 09:23 AM | Link to this

Mid south? The evangelical right rose to power on guns, gods and gays. The issue is implied in every interview with the right.
I wish gay marriage was our only serious problem. However, there is evidence of a new front in the war on terror.

The execution of four US soldiers who were kidnapped during a raid in Baghdad exposes sophisticated, multi-tiered inter-factional collusion. Think about this: The enemy knew where and when. The raid went with clockwork precision, like it had been rehearsed over and over. The enemy acted like there was no risk to themselves or their suvs. How could the enemy have such resources and intel at their disposal? Also, the raiders spoke like americans. That means that the enemy has a repertoire of different soldier-types to choose from when planning raids.

This is evidence of a new front in the war on terror: an insidious, military/political network of Iraqi revolutionaries with the potential to identify and torpedo any evolution toward a self-sustaining, self-governing Iraq that can defend itself.

The most alarming aspect of this raid is that it indicates that it’s very possible for disquised Iraqis, acting and looking like americans, to cross the border into iran and massacre innocents, with surviving eyewitnesses all swearing that “it were the gringos what ate their babies”.

This raid has removed any shadow of doubt that the middle east is on the brink of a wider war, which will cost us trillions, and yet do nothing to stop the 911 conspirators who are still free to strike us anywhere, anytime.

Gay marriage? Yeah, that’s a real problem. Can our country survive? Yes, but only if we declare “Marsha- Marsha-Marsha Law”. (three mommies?)

By Redneck Convert

January 27, 2007 09:38 AM | Link to this

I’m against asking the VP about his gay dotter, who is in the fambly way. Course, if it was that Pelousy woman, I’d be for it. These libruls all want to make us conservatives look bad. Cheney can be a proud grandpa and still be against gay marriage. Last I heard, his dotter ain’t married to that woman that got her in the fambly way. So there’s no problem.

Them New Orleans bums need to get to work. Instead of waiting for a handout from us tax payers. I’m sick of paying taxes to support Those People. And that’s what the New Orleans people are.

And I’m against libruls bringing up affairs of god-fearing Republicans in the state house. So he fools around a little? I bet he goes to church on Sunday, and that makes everything all right. You can do a lot of bad things and go to church and get forgiveness.

Well, it’s a good weekend. Me and Jim Earl is going to watch the snowmobil races on TV. NASCAR ain’t started yet, so we got to make the best we can out of a bad situation. Anyway, I hope TFTT and Markus and Realist and MidSouth and Dusty and Van and all the other god-fearing conservatives give the libruls a good tanning. Don’t forget to stock up on booze today. I wouldn’t want nobody to make a mockry of my sabbath by trying to buy it on Sunday, like that librul getalife wants to do. If you ain’t got sense enough to lay in a few cases today, you got no business drinking. And none of that cheating by trying to run it by the self checkout cash register. You got to respeck my religion, we are the majority. Sister Dusty, Joe Bill says he’s got a big rattler for you to handle tomorrow morning. That fella ain’t got a chance. He’ll be begging to get out of that church when you start giving him a ear full.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 09:38 AM | Link to this

By Silly Rabbit January 27, 2007 09:23 AM Think about this: The enemy knew where and when. The raid went with clockwork precision, like it had been rehearsed over and over. The enemy acted like there was no risk to themselves or their suvs. How could the enemy have such resources and intel at their disposal?

Yea, it’s kind of like hijacking 4 airplanes full of passengers and piloting them into 3 large buildings, leaving nothing but huge craters behind, yes, sophisticated.

Welcome to the War on Terror, clown.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

Wrong, Drops with Wolves, this is a new construct of Iraqis who four years ago were sheep herders. This has nothing to do with 911, and if you think it does, then you are the polyp inside Osama Bin Laden’s poop shoot, giving him a leetle teekle every time he drops one, you unhurried turd slurrer. (and total idiot)

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

WootenDull,

Speaking of Republicans standing up for what’s right rather than what’s expedient, John McCain actually did the other night after the SotU speech.

I’ve long held the feeling that I could never vote for McCain and I still tend to feel he’ll backstab anyone along the way, but the other night when asked if his support for the troop surge could cost him the Presidency he said that sure it could, but it was far more important to win this battle than to win any political office. He may be able to gain my vote after all if he manages to stay consistent with that kind of thinking.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

By Silly Rabbit January 27, 2007 10:17 AM Wrong, Drops with Wolves, this is a new construct of Iraqis who four years ago were sheep herders. This has nothing to do with 911, and if you think it does, then you are the polyp inside Osama Bin Laden’s poop shoot, giving him a leetle teekle every time he drops one, you unhurried turd slurrer. (and total idiot)

Sure, maybe up in your dull little anti American fantasy world.

Let me get this straight, all Islamic males have their very own unique identity, their own separate beliefs and they all have different enemies but white Christians are all exactly the same?

Is that about right, suc-khole?

And you can’t tell one redneck from the other can you?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Dusty

January 27, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

Well, Saturday morning thoughts on Jim’s thoughts & others:

Red Neck, don’t worry about Joe Bill and the big snake. Didn’t you read Jim’s column: dead man found at church?

New Orleans man still in Atlanta wants $6,000 FEMA handout: but I thought getalife had gone back to Louisiana.

Mid South, Wolfie is just that, a liberal sheep trying to act like a conservative wolf.

Jim Webb….just another Democratic “loose cannon” aimed at President Bush instead of our enemies.

Jim says the price of gas is down. Excuse me while I take the Cavalier (American made GM car) over to QT and fill it up. But I shall drive very conservatively to help the president cut that 20% gas usage. I may even fly more to cut down on my driving. Cheers!

By Mallory

January 27, 2007 10:38 AM | Link to this

J.Wooten, if the guy from New Orleans isn’t working here then he needs to get on back to NO and work there to rebuild his complaint, but then he wouldn’t have a complaint would he?

You sound like a bleeding heart liberal with your Idol comment. I think those desperate souls you care about are idiots that deserve to be exposed. They probably cooperate with Hollywood’s need to make trouble. If they’re stupid enough to fall for it then they deserve what they get. Embarrassment and humiliation.

I don’t think we’re all that different from China when it comes to kids. Kill them before they’re born or kill them with neglect after they’re born. It’s the communist way. No appreciation for life until it impacts the social order.

Last but not least. Democrats wouldn’t recognize good news if it bit them in their butts. They’ve all got their noses so far up each others bungholes anything they say is bound to stink.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

I guess Madame Speaker wants to try to demoralize the troops one soldier at a time if need be.

Instead, with her eyes firmly fixed in the rear-view mirror and on domestic politics, Pelosi seeks to lure the analyst into a discussion of the intelligence from five years ago that led to the decision to go to war - something clearly outside the soldier’s areas of responsibility or expertise.

This is not “fact-finding” - it’s an attempt to use our brave soldiers as extras in Pelosi’s political stunt film. Has anyone seen a MSM report on Pelosi’s attempt to exploit the solider for political ends? Neither have I.

By history buff

January 27, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Archivist Gregory Jarrell is a gem indeed. He is not alone in his enthusiasm for historical documents. Those of us who work for the archives are an excitable bunch. Seriously.

By Curious Observer

January 27, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

So, Bill Clinton gets a BJ in the White House and gets impeached.

Glenn Richardson displays the sexual morals of an alley cat and the complaint against him “was, and should have been dismissed.”

Nice double standard there, Wooten. I wonder what would have happened to the libido-endowed legislator had he been a Democrat?

By jm

January 27, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this

If this administration wants to rein in the Shia death squads in Iraq (not sure how to deal with the Sunnis), they need to stop wasting their time with al Maliki (sp?) and speak with Sistani. Sistani is the one person who all the Shia in Iraq listen to. He was the reason Bush had to hold the elections earlier than he wanted to. Funny thing, he refuses to speak with anyone from the US because he wants us out of their country. I bet if the US was willing to give him a timeline on a departure, he could get most of the Shia to stop fighting. Of course, since the Saudis (remember them, they along with China gave President Bush the credit card he is using the pay for this boondoggle) don’t want this, so it will never happen.

By Dennis

January 27, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this

Jim Wooten writes; “Show us the way. U.S. Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), in giving the Democratic response to the State of the Union, said President Bush should take the “right kind of action for the benefit of the American people and for the health of our relations around the world…If he does, we will join him. If he does not we will show him the way.” Starting, one supposes, with a Democratic plan to succeed in Iraq. Right now they’re looking for a face-saving way to run.”

Mr. Wooten has drawn a line in the sand.

While I do not condone the spineless Democrats who, to play it politically safe, supported the unnecessary attack on Iraq, it is the puppet Republican party under the neocon leadership of George W. Bush who are responsibile for the mess that is today’s Iraq. And for that matter, failed American policies in the Middle-East.

Although under a dictatorship, prior to the Bush attack, Iraq was reasonably stable and America was getting its oil with NO LOSS of American military lives.

Whether Democrats can do it or not, I don’t know. But let’s admit, Mr. Wooten, as American soldiers are STILL DYING, it is the Republicans who are, AND SHOULD BE, looking for “a face-saving way to run.”

The only thing Bush and the Republicans can come up with is to propose more of their same failed “face-saving” policies.

We’ve lost this war, Mr. Wooten.

Bring the soldiers home.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

New Orleans man still in Atlanta wants $6,000 FEMA handout: but I thought getalife had gone back to Louisiana.

Good one. LOL.

Mid-South Philosopher,

I guess you forgot all her public appearances in the political arena. The quote Wolf used was by fellow conservatives and her pregnancy has stirred controversy. You know, those family values that Jim preaches about children raised by a man and a woman.

I have no doubt that this issue would not been brought up on Faux News but a real reporter would ask about the controversy.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

Here is what our troops are doing in Iraq:

By Texas Wreck

January 27, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

I am a voter that neither party wants. I am too much in the middle. I split the issues and refuse to be polarized by one specific issue, such as the war in Iraq. I refuse to demonstrate over abortion rights, either way. I belong neither to the religious right or the atheist left. I refuse to accept 20 pages of plank from either the Democratic or Republican Party and support every single issue in automaton fashion.

I believe in the death penalty. I believe in a woman’s right to choose. I believe in the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman. I believe personal morals and ethics matter, no matter which side of the aisle you sit on. I believe in a strong military presence that discourages our enemies and encourages our allies. I believe a country as rich as the United States should be open to opportunity for all of its citizens. I believe that immigrants should only be here legally, and that the criminals who come here should be incarcerated and then deported permanently. I believe in the goodness of the American people to help each other, and that it should be encouraged domestically and abroad. I do not believe that any president who has not served in the military, or who dodged the draft, should be allowed to be commander in chief. Non military veterans should be banned from serving as Secretary of Defense and military veterans should not serve as Secretary of State. I believe that public expression on issues of national security should be done cautiously with a view of the consequences of those actions. Just ask General Giap what those are. I believe that our leaders need to be held to the standards of cowboys: my word is my bond, my family name is sacred, I will be a straight shooter and cowboy up. I believe that the terrorist threat to the United States will not come from 90 year old Caucasian or African American grandmothers entering airplanes. Profiling is effective in Israel, and should be used here. I believe that no terrorist group that uses women and children as weapons, or hides behind them while firing weapons, deserves a seat at any table. Talking to or negotiating with these groups should be against our laws and our conscience. Finally, I believe the United States is actually in great shape, not withstanding the impression the idiots we elect or our “free press” want us to believe. Life is cyclical, and we have been here before and we will be here again. The ride is up and down, not straight line. That is called dead.

By Dusty

January 27, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this

Dennis,

You post that Wooten has “drawn a line in the sand”. Yes he has and I am wondering which side you are on. Ours or the terrorists? You didn’t make it clear.

When you come out of your bomb shelter, please note that we have NOT lost this war. We are having problems and have changed tactics, something that happens often in wartime. The new way is called “the surge”. Maybe you should try support instead of rapidly running backwards.

You don’t have to be a blind liberal not to see it, just a cowardly one to cut’n’run.

By Dusty

January 27, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Curious Observer,

One more time!! Clinton got impeached because he LIED UNDER OATH.

Clinton was disgraced because, as you said, he gets a BJ in the White House.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

Ah the deep mind of a liberal.

getalife tells us that any good journalist interviewing the Vice-President during wartime should ask about the VP’s daughter’s expected child, but if you ask the former President what he did to try to stop Bin Laden you’re way out of line.

By jm

January 27, 2007 12:00 PM | Link to this

RW-(the original):

or he could ask the current president what he is doing to get Bin Laden, besides propping up the Pakistani government that is sheltering him.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this

jm,

Yes he could and thank you for your attempt to obfuscate the issue. Yet another example of the “deep mind” of a liberal.

Funny that you would say Pakistan is “sheltering” him, if we decided to invade Pakistan you would probably turn on a dime and say Pakistan had him contained.

By silver

January 27, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

Ah sure hope D** Chaney’s expected brat is male, we will be needing more expendable combat units (ecu’s) soon, in a new 30 years war against all the freedom loving peoples of the world. Let’s see now, 300 million fat, lazy, greedy american pigs consuming 30 Percent of the worlds wealth per year, vs 6.2 billion freedom loving people collectively consuming the remaining 70 percent of the world wealth. I’m betting on the freedom loving folks in China, Viet Nam, Iran, and Russia. Perhaps D** Cheyne should become a baby factory, spitting out a platoon of ecu’s in a decade (a few twins in there). I think the technology exists to chemically make all the brats male, regardless of xx xy.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this

weekendlive@foxnews.com is asking what you think of John Kerry going to Switzerland and calling the United States an International pariah.

Why don’t some of you moonbats email in your support so we can drag the Senator back into the Presidential race. Then Hillary can show us his likely dishonorable discharge and his FBI files.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 12:20 PM | Link to this

RW,

w does not care about bin Laden. Does not even think about him.

He is “Osama been Forgotten.” I think back to w on the bullhorn after he lost 4 jets, two high hise buidings, the Pentagon and thousands of American lives and say, “They still do not hear you w.”

The victims never received justice for their family members murders because w invaded Iraq to get their oil.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 12:21 PM | Link to this

Who knew the Lone Ranger’s stuffed horse could type?

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 12:23 PM | Link to this

RW,

Not to mention the fact that Sen. Webb was outraged that President Bush had the audacity (/sarc) to ask him about his son who is serving in Iraq, and Getalife sided with Webb.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

BD,

You should like him too after what he said about Fonda.

His speech was great the other night and is a true leader unlike w.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

By silver January 27, 2007 12:14 PM Let’s see now, 300 million fat, lazy, greedy american pigs consuming 30 Percent of the worlds wealth per year, vs 6.2 billion freedom loving people collectively consuming the remaining 70 percent of the world wealth. I’m betting on the freedom loving folks in China, Viet Nam, Iran, and Russia.

Would anyone like to bet me on which country “sylvia” is hiding out in right now, and that it is not China, Viet Nam, Iran, or Russia?

Anyone want to wager which military it is that “sylvia” is counting on to protect her while she runs her mouth against the government which, by the way, would get her a bullet in the back of the head in her beloved China, Viet Nam, Iran, and Russia.

How much you want to put down that says slob “sylvia,” safely within the freedoms of the country she hates America, is “consuming” more than her share of the world’s resources, whatever the F that means, leisurely blogging against the free world, burning up energy, tying up a computer that could be used to teach a poor person how to better himself, spreading stupid distracting ideas that waste the time and efforts of the government to defend itself against.

How much you want to bet?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Why do you want thousands of our soldiers to die in the Hindu Kush mountains?

Buy Danish,

It’s amazing how they never see their own hypocrisy.

By silver

January 27, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

Silver is male, rich, and burns american resources like they were paper. Silver is correct, as the dollar is just a piece of green paper soon to be worthless, but for now it buys gasoline for silver hummer, his boat, and all his other toys. When the dollar is worthless, and it will be one day soon, silver’s investments in Europe and Asia, and his physical holdings of gold and Silver in Candada will still guarantee Silver’s plush life style. As for the rest of you, learn to walk and live on beans, because that is all you will have in say five years. Yawn, time of a mid day nap, now that my Mexican maid has left, a little richer and with a happy look on her still glowing face. Bye

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this

RW, (o): you belong in the penu-tush mountains, Kneels with Blowhards.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

RW,

Don’t you think it is very strange to have him in Tora Bora and he was allowed to escape?

I do and read daily about our governments real agenda and corporate destruction of our country.

Yesterday, Canada called us a country with” “questionable human rights records”. The rest of the world is coming to the same conclusion.

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Driving habits deemed undesirable? The only mistake people make is rushing forward toward stopped traffic so they can slam on their brakes, instead of slowing down and coasting to the red light, which always causes tailgating and tempers.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

getalfe,

I hope that “I do” wasn’t about wanting our soldiers to die in Afghanistan.

The places you read are the most vile hate filled left wing fever swamp sites out there. Have you ever noticed that say exactly the same things that the various terrorist tapes that come out do?

By jm

January 27, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this

RW-(the original: I guess it must be a liberal thing to want to go after the people who attacked us and their sponsors, like Bin Laden, the taliban and Pakistan (the taliban’s sponsor). Not to mention Saudi Arabia, where a lot of Al Queda’s money came from. Then again, since they are our pusher (both for oil and for the debt that President Bush is racking up), we have to do what they tell us. I guess the conservative approach is to divert our resources and invade a country that did not pose a threat to us and had not attacked us. Meanwhile, the taliban is having a resurgence, opium production is at record levels and Bin Laden is sitting in a cave somewhere laughing at us.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 01:00 PM | Link to this

Here are the edited and unedited segments from the movie Path to 9/11 that ABC showed last year. This probably sheds a little light on what classified documents Sandy Burglar was so intent on stealing and destroying.

You want something to give President Bush a hard time for, how about his justice department letting Berger off with a slap on the wrist.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 01:08 PM | Link to this

jm,

Think about how silly it sounds when you say Bin Laden is sitting in a cave laughing at us.

I bet the monkeys in the zoo think we’re the ones that are trapped too because we’re wandering around outside of a nice cozy cage.

As for the rest of your leftist drivel you have no vision whatsoever of what it will take to defeat this enemy and I’m afraid there are too many like you for us to win it. Once you are successful in getting the US to surrender our efforts in the Middle East the consequences will be dire and simply a matter of time. Aren’t you glad that you and those that want our destruction are in this together?

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 01:10 PM | Link to this

Bin Laden has released a new video, and I just happen to have a transcript of the text:

“Good evening, Ladies, Gentlemen, and Germs. I just flew in from Kabul, and boy, are my wife’s arms tired! My arms are tired too, not from flying, but from beating my wife during the flight. I had to beat her. She would not believe it wasn’t me who put the anthrax in her douchebags. I did not do it. Why wouldn’t she believe me? Anyway, I’ve been thinking that it’s not a good idea to conduct bio-chem warfare anymore. Why? Cause last night my wife contracted the inhalation form of PMS! It was terrible. I had to beat her again!

You know, I miss the good old days when I was anonymous. I could go anywhere, even to New York. Not that long ago I visited Broadway. I’m still trying to decypher all the coded messages in the Vagina Monologue.

Oh well, time to go, I hear the B-52’s overhead, and they aint singing love shack, baby.”

By getalife

January 27, 2007 01:10 PM | Link to this

RW,

You know I read the wingnut sites like this one and it is true, the truth does have a liberal bias.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 01:12 PM | Link to this

By silver January 27, 2007 12:39 PM Silver is male, rich, and burns american resources like they were paper. Silver is correct, as the dollar is just a piece of green paper soon to be worthless, but for now it buys gasoline for silver hummer, his boat, and all his other toys. When the dollar is worthless, and it will be one day soon, silver’s investments in Europe and Asia, and his physical holdings of gold and Silver in Candada will still guarantee Silver’s plush life style. As for the rest of you, learn to walk and live on beans, because that is all you will have in say five years. Yawn, time of a mid day nap, now that my Mexican maid has left, a little richer and with a happy look on her still glowing face. Bye

So 12:14 was a guilt trip, loser? Sort of like going to Church and confessing your sins, only except you skip the Church part?

Isn’t that so much like the way of the pinko, laid up in the most powerful, freest and richest country in the world, lavishly enjoying her freedom’s, except for that tinge of silly a-ss elitist liberal guilt, knowing full well that they she’s not earned any of it and insanely wishing the rest of us back into the fields, toiling all day in a socialist worker’s paradise, somehow paying “slyvia’s” penance for her?

This is so weird, man, you libs are shot the he-ll out, to say the least.

I can think of much better ways for you to appease your “sins,” pinko, and it doesn’t screw with the lives of the rest of us either.

Well, except for making our lives better.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 01:13 PM | Link to this

RW: Say hello to my little friend: <=3

By TW

January 27, 2007 01:22 PM | Link to this

RW - How about shrugging his shoulders at the Iranian IEDs that have been blowing our heads’ off for the past three years? Gonna give Bush a pass on that, too?

If ‘W’ had been president during the Cuban Missile Crisis we’d be part of the Soviet Union today.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

Your favorite American is on C-Span.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 01:25 PM | Link to this

By sylvia January 27, 2007 12:39 PM Sylvia is correct, as the dollar is just a piece of green paper soon to be worthless

Also, isn’t it just like a pinko to be hysterical over absolutely nothing, the U.S. economy increased at an amount that surpassed China’s entire gross national product.

That’s right, the United Sates added a Chinese economy onto it’s economy. That thought alone is staggering.

But does it stop potato head slyvia from running hither and yon, shrieking and wailing like an idiot about how China is going to gobble us up?

What a wanker.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By jm

January 27, 2007 01:27 PM | Link to this

RW-(the original) by “too many of us” you must mean the majority of the american people who disapprove of the job our President is doing.

Then again, I have to admire your blind devotion, you must be very high in the cult of Bush.

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 01:41 PM | Link to this

TW,

Look who doesn’t want us to take any action against the Iranians:

A senior intelligence officer was more wary of the ambitions of the strategy.

“This has little to do with Iraq. It’s all about pushing Iran’s buttons. It is purely political,” the official said. The official expressed similar views about other new efforts aimed at Iran, suggesting that the United States is escalating toward an unnecessary conflict to shift attention away from Iraq and to blame Iran for the United States’ increasing inability to stanch the violence there.

Gosh, do you think this person could be a liberal? It’s clear that this person doesn’t want us to quell the Iranian-fueled chaos in Iraq - that would be bad for the Democrats.

Getalife,

Here’s Jim Webb making all sorts of excuses for John Kerry’s treachery, while trashing men who served in the National Guard as draft dodgers.

Maybe his position on Hanoi Jane has “evolved” since he made the statement against her decades ago.

By Midori

January 27, 2007 01:42 PM | Link to this

Still spreading lies and disinformation, I see. Typical. So very, very typical.

after reading this thread, I come away more and more gratified and thankful that the American people woke up and voted the Republic Bush enablers out of office this past November.

As a matter of fact, after reading the daily ignorant rantings, ravings and bleatings of the herd of cheerleading sheep, I grow more grateful to the clear-thinking American populace.

You people (read: Bush Bots) are disgusting, delusional, ignorant and just plain all around stupid and dangerous.

you never met a fact that you didn’t twist, or a truth that you don’t ignore. The reality-based community obviously has left you behind.

I’m quite sure RW will respond with his ever boring and equally stupid “parrot” comments, but that’s ok, as he only reinforces my point. But then again, when faced with the truth, what else can he say? It’s much easier to resort to the childish pet names than to face the truth about himself and the loser that he constantly tries to prop up as a “leader among men”.

I just wish he’d update his material. Maybe Fox News can help him out in choosing some more “pet names”? Or Rush? Hannity? I’m quite sure they have a treasure trove in their dumpsters of limited imagination that he so enthusiastically likes to dive into.

I’m out to enjoy the day and the sunshine.

You right wing blowards ought to try it sometime. Sunlight has a way of taking care of mold problems, and it’s apparent that your brains sure could use “the cure”.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 01:48 PM | Link to this

TW,

No I don’t give him a pass on that. I’m part of the group that doesn’t approve of the way we’ve been fighting the war in Iraq. The ones that jm naively thinks are on his side.

There are quite a few of us that think we haven’t been fighting the Iranian and Syrian influences hard enough. I’m glad to see that is changing and hope we’ll see it through because the war we are fighting in Iraq right now doesn’t have as much to do with Iraq as it does with the overall war against Islmofascism.

You and jm should spend less time whining and start learning to be good dhimmis. Take Polly with you if you don’t mind.

Just like a mindless moonbat though to give credit for stopping the Cuban missile crisis to the guy that made Cuba the hellhole it is today and let the missiles get placed there to begin with.

getalife,

The next time you have truth on your side will be the first.

By Midori

January 27, 2007 01:53 PM | Link to this

some final red meat for the ignorant: Karl Rove will be testifying in the Scotter Libby trial.

Discuss.

Tell us how Karl will make the “liberal wankers” look stupid, and how he will miracuously and systematically restore “honor and dignity” to this fetid gaggle of moronic criminals holed up in the White House.

Upon my return I look forward to your comments. I’m making a scrap book.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 01:54 PM | Link to this

Translation of the 1:42

The early edition of the Sunday bird cage liner is out and it’s time for the parrot’s cage to be cleaned.

Midori honey, I’d love to dispute or debate your points if you ever included any.

By Sgt. Badass

January 27, 2007 01:56 PM | Link to this

LISTEN UP JM!

DO NOT try to reason with these traitors! They are obviously gutless draft dodging neo commie girlie basturds intent on ruining this fine country and they must stepped on like the cockroaches they are.

Where is that yellow french f@ggot, monsieur markie? I’ll personally make that one rue the day he was born.

Talking with these other misfit pansies - you’re wasting your time. They are non-producing godless scumbags and assorted domestic enemies. And they must be rooted out and have their balls shoved down their treasonous lying throats.

Carry on.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 02:00 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Did you start your scrap book with the announcement of Rove’s indictment?

psst…getalife guess what? Fitzmas has arrived! Rove has been indicted.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHA

gotta love that Jason Leopold, always playing to the parrots.

By TW

January 27, 2007 02:00 PM | Link to this

BD – your link is from 2007? Where you been, girl????? Not like they just found out about Iran’s involvement last week – though, sadly, I guess that could be believable. What we have here is a frat boy whose found himself in the alley and has no idea what to do. Fighting is a ‘tough guy’ sport – better know how to handle yourself when you get called on that puffed out chest, know what I mean? Ask Japan. Besides, he’s ‘The Decider’ and he could have done whatever he wanted when he had the ‘The Monica Lewinsky Congress’ on its knees in front of him.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 02:01 PM | Link to this

RW,

Here is some more truth.

You say you want to fight Syria, yet we rendition there to torture.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 02:05 PM | Link to this

Has anybody noticed that when Midori shows up a whole cast of psychos comes along?

Speaking of which, look what was posted at my blog last night from an IP in California:

The sad part about Friday nights in another continent is missing the active give and take on Mike’s blog when it;s open. Seems I’m either working or sleeping, darn it. Mostly I miss the giving by the rational Americans there… and the taking (on he chin, gut, butt, cojones) of the numnut neocons who just…don’t…get it.

But your blog helps make up for it… even if I can’t ge too rambunctious. We all know what happened to Washington State! Yours truly… bon scott

Speaking of nutcases, when’s drunken Andy geing out of rehab? Yours for America! bon scott

And no, that post has not been altered in any way.

By silver

January 27, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

Ah, that was a refreshing power nap. Ah see the peasants have been misbehaving during my post coital slumber. Silver believes you people are idiots, the world is not divided just between liberals and conservatives, actually most people are something else. Silver is part secular humanist, part hedonist, and part psychopath (but aren’t we all?), but Silver does try to repress the psychopathology until the situation is right for a real fun romp. More than anything else, Silver is a realist, and he recognizes the lies of the neocons for what they are, self serving memes. Frankly, Silver enjoys war, Silver hopes America remains at war forever and a day. Silver feels no guilt, no shame, no fear, just the thrill of opportunity. The death of american money and power will leave a void that can be taken advantage of in many ways, and Silver plots daily to take unfair advantage at the most opportune moments. Silver supports the surge of troops into Iraq and Afganistan, as that drain on american resources plays right into Silvers investment strategies. Silver also supports an invasion of Iran for similar reasons. Silver suspect Cheney and his ilk are thinking along the same lines, and they have positioned themselves to profit also. The memes they utter are just for the stupid ditto heads to repeat into the public ear. Silver supports the draft, as it will rid him of those pesky 20 something males who seem to get all the hot babes, not that they deserve or can afford them. Silver hopes the draft will result in a reduced cost of pleasure units, and many more choices.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 02:11 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Remember what I said about you never having truth on your side?

Did you really mean to come back and prove me right that quickly?

By jm

January 27, 2007 02:14 PM | Link to this

Funny thing about those iranians supporting the shia in iraq. After the first President Bush encouraged them to rebel against Saddam (who based up current Bush definitions for the middle east would be considered a “moderate”) and then abandoned them, it was the iranians who provided them aid (and in some cases shelter). As long as the US is occupying Iraq (we are no longer liberators, we are occupiers in the iraqi’s eyes), the iraqi shia will take the iranian assistance. But, if RW had studied his history as well as his koran, he would also realize that the arabs of iraq and the persians of iran, while both shia, don’t exactly get along. Based upon history, it is extremely unlikely that a shia led iraq would become a satellite of iran. An ally maybe, but not a puppet.

By getalife

January 27, 2007 02:16 PM | Link to this

More truth for RW,

The wingnuts staged a counter- protest from the tens of thousands in Washington today.

“About 40 people staged a counter-protest”.

How freaking pathetic.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 02:23 PM | Link to this

jm,

I bet that’s news to the Sunni Arabs that they’re really Shia. You sound a lot like the chairman of the House Select Committee on Intelligence.

By Dennis

January 27, 2007 02:24 PM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) January 27, 2007 01:08 PM said, “As for the rest of your leftist drivel you have no vision whatsoever of what it will take to defeat this enemy and I’m afraid there are too many like you for us to win it.”

The problem comes when the monkeys in the zoo either cannot/will not grasp that the neocons in the White House are using the U.S. military to feather their own financial nests.

Fighting terrorism is second and third and fourth….

One can wonder if you “have no vision whatsoever of what it will take to defeat this enemy” here at home who are bit by bit making your liberties less and less by creating methods to invade your privacy anytime they want including without a court order.

If the axiom “Physician, heal thyself” has any meaning, perhaps you ought to heed it.

And you might begin by conceding that every conceivable lie GWB has offered for invading Iraq, including fighting terrorism there, has been shot down on its face.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 02:30 PM | Link to this

Isn’t it so typical, Midori finally throws open the lid of her coffin at 1:42 in the afternoon and immediately let’s out a whine about how other people choose to spend their day.

Why don’t you pinkos have some kids so you can quit worrying about us?

Dennis: Really, then why did Clinton bomb Iraq for over a decade?

For sport?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 02:38 PM | Link to this

Dennis,

You haven’t lost a single liberty.

We’ve been getting attacked by radical Muslims since at least 1983 so it’s more than a little silly to be blaming President Bush for it and claim that he and his cronies cooked it up for the military industrial complex.

There were no lies about Iraq unless you are willing to say that it’s been a vast government conspiracy dating back into the Clinton administration and involving both Democrats and Republicans and want to claim the Kurds gassed themselves.

Do you guys ever back any of your accusations with fact or is the accusation enough for you?

By jm

January 27, 2007 02:39 PM | Link to this

RW: I will make is simple for you.

iraq, predominantly arab and predominantly shia

iran, predominantly persian and predominantly shia

arabs and persians, throughout history, have not gotten along.

iraq does have a large sunni arab population (as well as kurds and turkmen and others) but they are in the minority.

Turn off Hush Bimbo and Hannity some time and try watching the History channel or better still, venture into the library, open a book (not “My Pet Goat”) and open your eyes.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 02:39 PM | Link to this

RW: The way that finchie spells he could have been menaing to say that he was spending another incontinent Friday night, hahaha.

in·con·ti·nent –adjective

Take your choice.

By silver

January 27, 2007 02:48 PM | Link to this

Careful Wootendull, my psychopathology knows no limits.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 02:49 PM | Link to this

WootenDull,

He really seems to have developed an aversion to the letter T too.

You may be right since most people would say they were on another continent not in. When did California become another continent anyway.

jm,

Do you have a point to your Iraq/Iran census information?

By Sgt. Badass

January 27, 2007 03:04 PM | Link to this

WOOTENDULL! YOU GODLESS SODOMITE!!

Shut your filthy yellow yap!!

Slimey pieces of crap like you who think they know something about anything are what’s wrong with this country! You don’t!! So shut that ugly stench-filled hole below your nose and get that scrawny little girl a$$ of yours down to the recruiting office!! NOW!! And bring that gutless forkface puke moron RW with you!!

Hell, I killed VC that I respected more than you simpering cowards!!

By Silly Rabbit

January 27, 2007 03:05 PM | Link to this

Cheney keeps referring to the success of the Iraq War. He gave a detailed list of how much success we’ve achieved in Iraq to Chris Mathews. Last sunday. “Removed Saddam”. etc.

Cheney thinks Saddam would now be involved in a nuclear arms race with Iran if we didn’t step in. Imagine a nuclear exchange between Iraq and Iraq! What were we thinking?

Cheney is getting weirder by the day. That low-key squawked monotoned delivery is starting to scare even me.

The only possible answer is that they are hiding intel about something really horrendous so that we all dont panic. There has to be a hidden motive to the Iraq War which has yet to be revealed.

But the one thing I’m certain of is that the troll-wipes on this board dont have a clue about any development in Iraq. Real news hounds.

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 03:14 PM | Link to this

TW,

Save your tough guy speech for Cindy Sheehan et al.

That quote is from 2007 and a liberal “intelligence” officer thinks we should just carry on and let Iran wreak havoc in Iraq.

Unfortunately the CIA is infested with liberals and they dole out very bad advice, in addition to leaking to WaPo reporters like Dana Priestwho are married to Ultra-Leftist activists like William Goodfellow.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 03:15 PM | Link to this

By sylvia January 27, 2007 02:48 PM Careful Wootendull, my psychopathology knows no limits.

psy·cho·pa·thol·o·gy 1 : the study of psychological and behavioral dysfunction occurring in mental disorder or in social disorganization.

Diagnose away, dic-khead.

If by the off chance you were referring to your own mental condition, I have a cure for that.

By jm

January 27, 2007 03:20 PM | Link to this

RW - aside from demonstrating your ignorance of the middle east, no.

By silver

January 27, 2007 03:29 PM | Link to this

Silly Rabbit, the fear you see in Cheney and his ilk comes from three sources: 1) they know the american dollar is doomed, and that they have done much to doom it sooner rather than later; 2) they know american military power is over rated, and only our nuclear weapons allow us to continue the illusion that we rule the world; 3) the oil situation is much worse for us than for the rest of the world because of 1) above, and the fact that we consume 25 percent of the worlds oil. Mexico is pumping the last of its super giant oil field, with nothing to replace the lost production. They are our second largest source of foreign oil. Domestic oil production is droping daily, with nothing to replace it. All that is left is mid east oil as our salvation, and we can only have that if we maintain the status quo, that is the current corrupt old men in Saudia Arabia must remain in power and accept more and more of our paper dollars for their valuable oil. We can’t guarantee the status quo, and everday it appears more and more likely that the arab world will break free of american domination. The Arabs have China and Russia and Europe as customers even after the dollar dies. So we are screwed.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 03:32 PM | Link to this

jm,

I think all you’re demonstrating is that you can’t keep up with the conversation so you decided to throw up some nonsense.

What you’re demographic lesson really points to is that we need to stay until Iraq can defend herself because the Iranians would overrun Iraq. Sounds familiar, did I miss the part where you jumped over to our side?

By silver

January 27, 2007 03:33 PM | Link to this

Silver has given Wootendull’s home address to Sgt Badass, in hopes the good Sgt will make a home visit to his poor friend, who seems to be under the weather.

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 03:48 PM | Link to this

Me and Mr. Smith would enjoy some company.

Seriously.

By TW

January 27, 2007 03:49 PM | Link to this

BD - None of those liberals are the Commander in Chief. That you are satisfied with the fact that Bin Laden has made a joke out of us screams volumes about your true concern for this country. We need a better coach. Why the demeaning sports analogy? Because if the South cared as much for the military as it does its football we wouldn’t be in this mess. Noticed when they ran Shula out of Alabama nobody accused them of not suppporting Tide football…John Edwards is right about there being two Americas, but the divide is between those who care about this place and those who don’t. Which one are you, Buy Danish?

By jm

January 27, 2007 03:52 PM | Link to this

RW - I see you drank some more kool aid. Right now, the iranians are helping the iraqis defend themselves against the US. As long as we are occupying Iraq, that will continue to be the case. If after the US leaves, the iranians try to step in and take over, the iraqis will start fighting them. The shia in Iraq and the the shia in Iran have a great deal in common and because of that will probably be close allies. However, arab iraq (shia or not) is not going to allow itself to be ruled by persian iran. That has been the case for thousands of years.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 04:04 PM | Link to this

jm,

So now you’re saying that the Iraqi army is joining the Iranians to fight against the US military?? You are simply delusional.

By Sgt. Badass

January 27, 2007 04:21 PM | Link to this

WOOTENDULL! YOU CUM-BUCKET!!

Listen up queerbait!! You and your little queen Mr. Smith, can go to your local ladies knitting club if you want some company!!

Trust me traitor, this isn’t going to be a courtesy call!! You are a cowardly split-tail who only wants to fvck up this country and you make me sick!! If there’s a knock at your door and you see me, do what you do best - HIDE!!

But if I catch your useless pinko carcass, I promise you’ll I’ll tear that worthless disgusting head of yours off and crap down your neck!!

And who the hell is this latest treasonous scumbag/noise maker buy french?!!

Looks like another of those useless non-serving euro loving traitorous fudgepacking nazi supporting pimply faced t**!!

These basturds are just using valuable oxygen and need to be eliminated from the gene pool right now!!

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 04:24 PM | Link to this

TW,

I would like Bush to fire the Leftists who infest the CIA. How’s that for a criticism of the President.

As for your two America’s theme, you’re dividing the country up into the North and the South. You libs love to do that - rich/poor, black/white, North/South. You just can’t help yourself.

The Civil War’s over Bud, but as far as caring about this country, you’ll not find anyone who cares more than I do.

By jm

January 27, 2007 04:25 PM | Link to this

RW - once again, I will make it simple for you. The iranians are providing training, logistics and material to the shia in iraq (which they have been doing since the end of the first gulf war). Which in turn, in being used against the US, as well as the sunnis. Though I think they are more interested in going after the sunnis. They might be crazy but they are not stupid. That is why President Bush issued his little order to kill or capture iranians caught in iraq. It would be interesting to find out where the sunnis are getting their material. I doubt it is from iran or syria. Can you say Saudi Arabia?

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 04:29 PM | Link to this

Right now, the iranians are helping the iraqis defend themselves against the US.

RW,

jm no doubt claims to “support the troops”, like the rest of the “peace marchers” who have identified this country as the enemy.

Amazing how bold he is in admitting where his heart really lies - right with Al Sadr and the Mahdi Army.

Nice.

By TW

January 27, 2007 04:29 PM | Link to this

BD - your self proclaimed patriotism is reassuring. Join me changing the term ‘tax burden’ to ‘investment’?

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 04:37 PM | Link to this

TW,

WTF are you babbling about now, jackass?

Calling taxes an investment is a Bill Clinton trick, but I’m lost as to what your rejoinder has to do with Iran.

By jm

January 27, 2007 04:45 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish :

Who decided to invade a country that had not attacked us nor posed any threat to us, toppled the existing government and disbanded the army, thus giving al Sadr and the Mahdi Army the power they currently have?

Why President George W. Bush, of course and his band of enablers in congress, who were more concerned with holding on to their seats than the welfare of the country.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 04:46 PM | Link to this

jm,

Would you please make up your mind before you hit the keyboard again. This isn’t one of your libby c-o-cktail parties where you spout some statistical physcobabble and everybody else nods their head.

As for the Sunnis, do you remember a guy named Saddam? He used to run the country and stashed weapons all over the place that many of the Sunnis know about. There is also a large contingent of Al Qaeda in Iraq. Don’t you find it a little odd that they had an instant arsenal of weapons and a network of safe houses from as soon as we took out Saddam’s regime? Why it almost sounds like they already had a hefty little presence there doesn’t it?

By TW

January 27, 2007 04:47 PM | Link to this

BD - Those who care about America will willingly pay for her. You wetting your pants when I mention your money explains perfectly your nonchalance toward the war (Iraq is where the war is). Why the name calling? Was not trying to hurt your feelings. Obviously I have, and for that I apologize. Maybe this whole war thing is just a little much for you?

By Sgt. Badass

January 27, 2007 04:49 PM | Link to this

BUY FRENCH!! YOU PUS FILLED BIDET!!!

You should be dragged by your skinny heinous draft dodging a$$ down to gitmo for a room with your towel-head buddies!! Or just plain shot you gutless fvckstick for that demented lie that nobody cares about the good old USA more than you!!

What traitorous piece of crap told you the CIA is infested!! And who taught you to talk the sissified treasonous way you do? Your worthless surrender happy french parents?!! You are nothing but a sickening treacherous dirtbag who wouldn’t know a true patriot if one fell on you!!

Don’t ever lie about caring about this country again!! Got it you filty loser?!!!

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 04:58 PM | Link to this

TWit,

There are plenty of vulgar and arrogant leftist “patriots” like Silver, Sgt. Badass, and PoFo the Rabbit to practice your “debating skills” with.

Include me out.

Thanks in advance.

By Dennis

January 27, 2007 04:59 PM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) writes @ 02:38 PM | Dennis, “We’ve been getting attacked by radical Muslims since at least 1983 so it’s more than a little silly to be blaming President Bush for it and claim that he and his cronies cooked it up for the military industrial complex.”

I can quickly admit that we have been attacked by radicals before GWB. But perhaps unlike you?, I also can admit our own acts of terrorism whenever it has suited the purpose of our “military-industrial” complex and still does.

There’s more to terrorism than just killing and blowing up people and places. It’s all well documented including here at home if you are not afraid of looking at it as a man with an open mind.

Therefore, you might want to answer your own question; “Do you guys ever back any of your accusations with fact [that it’s always been “them” and “not us”] or is the accusation [of the ilk of GWB/Cheney] enough for you?”

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By jm

January 27, 2007 05:02 PM | Link to this

Sorry RW, but I find it hard to believe that the sunni insurgency has continued all this time with the weapons that Saddam, whose only religion was the cult of Saddam, had stashed around the country. Especially, when you consider the satellite and fly over the surveillance the country has been under since the end of the first Gulf War.

As for al Queda, like al Sadr and the Mahdi Army, they have President George W. Bush to thank for creating the power vacuum that allowed them to gain a foothold.

By TW

January 27, 2007 05:13 PM | Link to this

BD - White flag accepted and your welcome.

By Dusty

January 27, 2007 05:14 PM | Link to this

Sgt. Badass,

Would you mind cleaning up your act?

In the first place, you are one big phony as everybody knows.

You’ve got a mouth that a sewer would reject.

You are someone’s alter ego here who doesn’t want us to know what a dirty mind he has and tries to conjure up a conservative. What a joke!

Here’s your white flag. Now march off into the sunset with silly silver rabbit and the rest of your liberal cut’n’run crew.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 05:17 PM | Link to this

Dennis,

Nice rant and not a single fact, episode, or link. No wonder our kids are having a tough time learning anything with morons like you “teaching” them.

I don’t buy your idiotic moral equivalence or your insinuation that we deserve to be attacked for perceived wrongs. Islamic radicals are attempting to build a world wide caliphate so how is the US causing that?

TW,

Where don’t we “invest?” Local tax, State tax, Federal income tax, medicare, the ponzi scheme known as social security, sales tax, gas tax, “sin” tax on whatever the government feels they can get away with, property tax, school tax, ad valorem tax and a myriad of other taxes. Then when you need any government service you have to pay fees for document copying, usage fees, license fees etc.

So when some dumbass liberal comes along and wants to call it an “investment” so we’ll feel all warm and cozy about being taxed up to our eyeballs, don’t expect a pleasant reaction from small government conservatives like BD or myself.

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 05:22 PM | Link to this

jm,

They didn’t just come in during a power vacuum and immediately have arms, contacts, and safe houses. I’m sorry that you are so blinded by BDS that you can’t see that.

By Buy Danish

January 27, 2007 05:23 PM | Link to this

TWit,

No white flag, squirt. Just a cessation of vulgarities. We could call it “keeping TW contained”.

By Sgt. Badass

January 27, 2007 05:28 PM | Link to this

DUSTBIN!! YOU IDIOTIC TW@T!!!

Would you mind if I put a pair of size 11 combat boots up that fat traitorous a$$ of yours?!! It’s not as if the entire 5th fleet hasn’t up there anyway w*******!!

Some real American should have shut you up and kicked your skanky aids-infested teeth in long ago!!

You are one treasonous little Osasma lovin’ piece of crap fascist that needs to hang!!

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 05:36 PM | Link to this

JIM WOOTEN and/or the AJC minders (Hi Lea!),

Would you mind explaining what is added to your blog by the kind of posts we see at 4:21, 5:28 and why you put up with it?

By WootenDull

January 27, 2007 05:36 PM | Link to this

The blog conversation must establish motive with the victim’s IP on record- Check.

The Colt Competition Match Target HBAR 2 has a full 30 round clip with one round in the chamber- Check.

The victim should leave evidence of attempted intrusion into premises- .

Sgt. Larda-ss: You don’t have to knock, good buddy, besides I’m old and senile and can’t hear very well any more. Just press your palm and four fingers firmly against the front glass, this will set off the motion detector and I will answer the alarm.

Be sure to stand directly in front of the door, this way I will know it’s you pal, and I will let you have it, er, umm, in.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Dennis

January 27, 2007 05:58 PM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) January 27, 2007 05:17 PM | writes, I don’t buy your idiotic moral equivalence or your insinuation that we deserve to be attacked for perceived wrongs.

“Islamic radicals are attempting to build a world wide caliphate so how is the US causing that?”

“Nice rant and not a single fact…”

Rw, do you want to discuss anything, or do you just want to argue?

Our foreign policy is based largely on ideas expressed by George Kennan in a Policy Plannig Study 23 (PPS23) Foewign Relations of the Unitred States (FRUS), 1948.

“We have about 50% of the world’s wealth, but only 6.3% of its population…. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity…. To d so, we will have t dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives…. WE should cease to talk about vague and…unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogan, the better.”

That’s the policy.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Sgt. Badass

January 27, 2007 05:59 PM | Link to this

RW!! YOU GUTLESS LITTLE MAMA’S BOY!!

Go tell the nice people at the AJC how the Sgt. is hurting your widdle bitty feelings!! Just like that yellow old d!ckface, Wootendull, you are a weak little pu$$y!! You sh!tforbrains wouldn’t make it one day at Parris Island!!

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 06:02 PM | Link to this

So is this when Thinking Right closes up shop for the day or is it like the thread earlier in the week that never closed?

By RW-(the original)

January 27, 2007 06:24 PM | Link to this

So Dennis shows up with the first policy idea he wants to discuss all day with an excerpt slap full of ellipses and typos with no link, two minutes before the blog closes. Does anyone think he seriously wanted a discussion?

So should I see what I find when I look up “foewign” [sic] or “Unitred” [sic]? Let’s give “foewign” a shot.

Are you Knut Wicksell when you aren’t Dahreese or Dennis?

They hate us because we’re successful…waaahhh..waahh

By shirley you jest

January 28, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this

Ahhh, the dark side of TADs. Too bad Wooten didn’t use his pulpit to raise the warning before the city saddled us all with the Beltline. Just three months after giving up millions in tax revenues to that TAD, the Atlanta Schools upped the mill rate. Plus they even admitted the percentage increase had to be higher since they had fewer parcels to collect it from because of all the TADs. For once Wooten knows about what he speaks.

By HELLINAHANDBASKET

January 28, 2007 04:51 PM | Link to this

Casey Sheehan…HE paid the ultimate price, HE made the ultimate sacrifice for his fellow soldiers and his country, HE IS THE REAL HERO not his star struck, media hungry mother. Hell she couldn’t bother to get her son’s grave a headstone, it took two years and the media attention before she did anything about it and then she complained and blamed the Army for not paying for it…all she had to do was ask the Veterans administration would have done it. And what about his father’s story and why doesn’t anyone in the media shine a light on Casey’s story and his incredible life. The fact of it is their stories are not as politically correct as Cindy’s is.

By Corey

January 29, 2007 08:49 AM | Link to this

I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t have truth in a bag. What about you, R.W., Getalife, Sgt. Badass, Dennis et al. What about you Sadie Fields? Are you willing to bet your life that you have God’s truth in a bag? I can’t hear you!

By Silly Rabbit

January 29, 2007 09:03 AM | Link to this

Jane Fonda and the crowd were lucky that tanks didn’t run them all down ala Tienamin Square in China.

We have lost. All is lost. Our liberty gained through revolution eleven score and eleven years ago is buried in sand.

Bush answers to someone, some power, but it’s not the american people.

By Mike

January 29, 2007 09:23 AM | Link to this

It is always nice to see so many good patriotic amuricans talk down about anyone who has a different opinion or outlook on situations which are going on in this country and abroad. I guess if you dont have a conservative slant on things then something is wrong with you. And this is what you people wish to spread to other countries.