Thinking Right

By Brian Curtis

January 19, 2007 08:08 AM | Link to this

“you’ve left a world that has lost its capacity to recognize the difference between humans and other forms of life.”

Lost the capacity? No, not at all. It’s more an indicator of whose life was more meaningful. And plenty of animals have led FAR more meaningful lives than many humans I’ve seen.

Exciting news, by the way: President Bush announces willingness to obey the law! (http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/news/0119.html) This is widely regarded as a HUGE setback for Republicans who had previously considered themselves above such petty concerns.

Incoming Democratic freshman rejoice. “Never has the bar been set so low,” one crowed. “All we have to do is not rape a dead goat on live television, and we’ll look like saints by comparison!”

By jack

January 19, 2007 08:25 AM | Link to this

The End Is Nigh!!! I actually agree with every point in this column today. Surely that’s a sign for the superstitious.

Good Job Mr. Wooten.

By jbmlaw

January 19, 2007 08:26 AM | Link to this

Good morning all. The only reason I yield to Jim’s evaluation of the Nifong book is that the more interesting story of our Gwinnett brothel has already been made into Broadway musical and Hollywood movie. They would have to move the venue from Texas to Georgia, but the story is the same.

Thank goodness we have the Department of Education interfering with the private right of contract, between parents and potential tutors; no telling what children might learn in a free environment. That sort of big brother superior thinking is what happens when you create a bureaucracy with no end product.

The Senate earmarks vote is much funnier than the story Jim tells. Reid had proposed his non-change window-dressing, and (I think it was) DeMint proposed amending the restriction to parallel Nancy Pelosi’s house rule. Reid knee-jerk opposed the change (not knowing the similarity to Pelosi’s rule), but lost on the proposal to change; when the WSJ mocked Reid publicly, he yielded.

While I like the idea of Gingrich’s new medical internet site, it does not go far enough. Why should we not have public access and allow private right to “write” prescriptions, get doctors out of the mix entirely?

By The Truth Hurts

January 19, 2007 08:29 AM | Link to this

When do all the wingnuts wake up on here?

By Brian Curtis

January 19, 2007 08:56 AM | Link to this

“When do all the wingnuts wake up on here?”

In truth… they never have.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 09:21 AM | Link to this

Where is all the black and liberal outrage at the disgusting uppity bigotry and lemming like rush to judgment over the shameful, infamous Duke Lynching. The mentally unbalanced, lying black stipper/prostitute has thus far got away with one of the most despicable of crimes that any woman can ever perpetrate - falsely and maliciously crying rape in a purely racial spite case.

Blacks and liberals, and especially the evil liberal DA Nifong, owe the completely innocent legally lynched white students a grovelling apology for their bigotry, racebaiting, lemming like hysterical rush to judgment and implaccable refusal to actually objectively investigate and assess ALL the facts and overwhelmingly exculpatory evidence. The stripper and Nifong belong in jail for their crimes.

Libby’s Lynching in DC is already being badly affected by the presence of sick and twisted Bush haters in the jury pool.

This GA Voter ID Bill should be pursued as soon as possible, its one of the finest bills to emerge from the legislature in decades. Its only hatepig liberals and racebaiting blacks who know the truth about their corrupt vote buying, dead people voting, multiple voting etc scams. Practices that are far too common in many demoNcrat areas of the US. This is just part of the dark legacy of over a century of arrogant corrupt demoNcrat control of GA.

The state legislature also needs to crack down much harder on illegals in every way possible. Target the employers as well as the liberals who pander to them and empower their abuse of tax payer and other benefits they have no moral/legal right to.

Pork barrel projects from both parties should be prevented, at county, state and national level. Taxes for all of us can easily be reduced by stopping pandering to any special interests, any racial group, consumer group or industry. Even the far left Republican Yankkkee Bloomberg in New Yaaawk City is reducing taxes for everyone on certain goods because of the surplus billions already ‘extorted’. Always give the money back to the folks.

Hilarious to see the Pelosibitch and corrupt Dingy Reid already publicly humiliated in just a week or so by their arrogant abuse of power in their new supercilious liberal regime. At least Bush can still veto the worst of their chicanery.

Still no news on the corrupt Willie Campbell’s life in a FL federal prison. Hopefully he’ll soon be joined by the corrupt congressional black caucus chappie who had $90,000 in his freezer. And why the stony silence on the official investigation into sick willie’s venal pardon selling scam. Looks like this will be swept under the carpet, just as if Butch Reno was still blocking investigations into the most corrupt post war administration.

There’s something rather queer about all this limpwristed screeching:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/01182007/tv/gaysanatomytvdonkaplan.htm

By Political Foreskin

January 19, 2007 09:21 AM | Link to this

Epithaph for Ralph on his tombstone: “I was a Big fish in a small pond, well, not really even a pond, more like a puddle, honestly I’ve seen larger goldfish bowls, what did they expect me to do, I remember this one time at Hammerhead Camp….”

The best book yet to be written is about how we communicate, after all, Mr. Wooten, you called it the “Duke University Rape Case”.

You cant make a silk parse out of a neo’s earmark.

One of the classes tutored for No Child Left Behind is “How to stay in school after your Visa has expired”. We are our own worst enemy. Those tutors probably make more than our teachers, paid for by the neo-newts, who have obviously never been tutored in constitutional law.

Doctor’s handwriting goes to the core of our inability to communicate properly. We never ever reveal our intentions. We might think we say it like it is, but we merely emote disquised cultural war whoops, like our ancient ancestors, who would move through the dark and tangled jungle communicating coded oral signals that wouldn’t betray their position, yet would broadcast intel to allies.

That’s why I never understand a word you write, Mr Wooten, the problem’s in our genes.

Strangely enough, in WW2, the Japs painted the decks of their aircraft carriers a bright yellow, making them easy targets for our dive bombers. The Japs just never quite got the concept of stealth. (or radar)

By Van

January 19, 2007 09:22 AM | Link to this

The Truth Hurts and Brian Curtis,

Some of us have jobs, you know “work”.

I see that section 220 of S 1 has been defeated, that goodness. Jim Wooten would have had to register with Congress as a grassroots organizer.

I can not imagine the Congress actually allowing earmarks being made public with their names attached. I do not think it will survive to make it to the Presidents desk.

Outside of that, I think this column is what I needed, a bit of comic relief after a long work week - oops, there I go again using words not meaningful to the lefties.

By Redneck Convert

January 19, 2007 09:25 AM | Link to this

Sorry to see Wooten slamming the private tutor outfits. If Ida had one back in the day, I mighta learnt them multiplying tables and not dropped out in the 5th grade. Then I could be using big words like jbmlaw and tftt without saying nothing but “your mama’s another one.” They went to school, but they sure didn’t get no edumacation.

Glad to see they are naming that aircraft boat after President Ford. It will probly fall off the skids when it’s launched and get showed all over TV. Or maybe it will run into two or three other boats like his golf balls run into watchers at the golf course. He was a librul. He called hisself a Republican, but he was for race-mixing and abortion and all the other librul causes.

We don’t need no doctors offices for perscriptions. Let people get their medacin on the net. If Sen. Bill Frist can tell everything about a womans condition just by watching her on TV, somebody that operates the net can tell what medacins we need.

Well, it’s off to the beer run for me. I want to get off this blog before the name calling begins. Besides jbmlaw and tftt, there will be Dusty calling everybody a trader for not seeing things the way she does, and Van and Markus will be chipping in. I’m glad I didn’t get much edumacation. I could learn to cuss people and call them names on my own, without wasting my time in a class room. Have a good weekend, everybody.

By JoeD

January 19, 2007 09:28 AM | Link to this

Just curious: Where were Senators Coburn, Demint and McConnell on this earmark issue when the GOP had control of the Senate the last 6 years? The “fiscal conservatives of the Republican Party sent more pork home than Hormel while they were in charge. Reid may have opposed the amendment initially, but at least he got the issue on the table. Senator Frist was too busy watching video and trying to diagnose patients to address the real problems of this country. Don’t try to co-opt the Democrats’ success on this issue by crediting the GOP for another round of fiscal responsibility forced on them by the Democrats. The GOP is late to the table on this one.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 09:32 AM | Link to this

aborted foreskin has finally decided to confront his conservative betters in the open rather than shamefully hiding behind a troll id. This cretinous afterbirth leftist pond scum has been perpetually stalking me by falsely attributing sullen remarks to me. Aborted foreskin should the world a grand favor and boldly jump in front of a train with the lying Durham black w*******!!

By zeke

January 19, 2007 09:34 AM | Link to this

SEND THE ACLU TO CHINA OR ANY OTHER COMMUNIST OR SOCIALIST COUNTRY AND LET THEM DESTROY THESE COUNTRIES THAT NEED TO BE DESTROYED!! HOW ABOUT VENEZUELA? BOLIVIA? EQUADOR? CUBA? MICARAGUA? GET THE ACLU BANNED BY LAW IN THE US AND SAVE US FROM THIS SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST, POPULIST LIBERAL CRAP!

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 09:39 AM | Link to this

@ Jim

I truly cannot believe that my comments were censored! Surely my intellectually honest assertion of calling the black hooker in Durham by her proper label doesn’t merit a censor. Play fair and be sure to censor some of the wanton venom spewing from our resident leftist nutters.

By Ms. Writer

January 19, 2007 09:41 AM | Link to this

Time for the truth: sure the chick lied and should be punished but how many white woman have been guilty of the same crime for decades…spare me the white tirade….wrong is wrong in black or white…racist.

By Southern Democrat

January 19, 2007 09:43 AM | Link to this

Apparently, Sheik Abdul-Hadi al-Darraji, one of al Sadr’s right hand men, has been arrested. Let’s all pray together that this will help reduce violence in Baghdad!

By Curious Observer

January 19, 2007 09:44 AM | Link to this

time for the truth,

Seek psychiatric help immediately. When even a rabid rightist like Wooten finds it necessary to edit your posts, you should develop an idea that you have a mental illness.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 09:55 AM | Link to this

I see snivelling pinko observer and Ms. Wanker have dishonestly accused me of racebaiting whilst glibly giving the DA Nifong a free pass. Leftist vermin like you two pathetically inconsequential marxists often fail miserably at debate with your conservative intellectual superiors thus feverishly and perpetually throwing out the racist label.

It’s quite sad but yet blindingly revealing just how hypocritical racist leftists can be!!

By Brian

January 19, 2007 09:57 AM | Link to this

When do all the wingnuts wake up here? We’re alive and well, thank you lefties. We just don’t dwell on planet Utopia, that’s all. We live in reality.

“If you are 20 and not a liberal, you have no heart. If you are 40 and not a conservative, you have no brain.”

By Deborah

January 19, 2007 10:00 AM | Link to this

Hey Wooten - what’s your opinion on allowing the people to vote on Sunday beer/wine sales. I’m disgusted that Perdue wants to stop this legislation from passing. I thought Repubs were about personal responsibility. LOL.

By Watta Load

January 19, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

When there are fewer mourners and drier eyes at your funeral than at Ralph the whale shark’s at the Georgia Aquarium, the moral is not that you were a nobody, but that you’ve left a world that has lost its capacity to recognize the difference between humans and other forms of life. Soon we’ll be holding wakes for mink coats

I know that this is just another snide Wooten snark, but it is just a completely stupid statement…why is empathy and compassion for the rest of the creatures here on earth supposed to limit our capacity to still show compassion for our own species? It doesn’t actually.

It has been my observation over 47 years that the people who are the least compassionate towards the lower species of this planet, are in fact the closest to them in intelligence.

I hope a bird craps on you today Jim.

By Ms. Writer

January 19, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

time for the truth: 50, yr old, unattractive white male, has narcisstic tendencies brought on by disappointing his military father and passive mother. Spends Friday nights watching Hitler documentaries with take out from the local Chinese spot.

By Political Foreskin

January 19, 2007 10:12 AM | Link to this

Sounds like Deborah cant wait for miller time. At least wait till noon, girlfriend. Dont you wish your boyfried was a freak like me?

By JoeD

January 19, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

TFTT, Not every post has to address every issue to be valid. Failure to acknowledge every single point you think you make is your own fault. You bury whatever sensible points you might have inside of so much ugliness and anger that most of us don’t even bother trying to find them. Give the venom a rest and try to making your points without the ugliness. We might find you actually have something to say.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

the sick anal stalker’s obsession just keeps on keeping on.

now its ludicrously attempting to drag other forum members and even Mr Wooten into its pathetic, losing battle with yours truly …

it’s now getting to the point where one is not always able to trust the ‘authorship’ of posts from several members. if the intent is simply to trash this forum and prevent free speech then this anal obsessive inadequate troll does need to be dealt with.

this is EXACTLY what happened on Access Atlanta several years ago - one nutter, over several months, single handedly destroyed the open, free speech forums and AA inevitably just dumped the forums.

hopefully this won’t be allowed to happen here. lefties are obviously hopelessly wrong on virtually very issue - but they absolutely have their right to say whatever they want - just as we on the right do!!

By Dennis

January 19, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

Mr. Wooten says; “It’ll be a great day for taxpayers when earmarks disclosure becomes law.”

Bring it on, bring it on!

Next to the Iraq war, that is the next biggest thing that is bringing the Bush administration down; al la, Cheney, Cunningham, Abramhoff, et. al., right on in to the White House office where “the buck $$$ stops here”.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

joey

I ain’t angry at all bubbakins … just having some fun exposing you (mostly) hateful lefties … DONT arrogantly TELL ME HOW TO POST … and I wont tell you!!

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this

MS. WANKER, unattractive 70 year-old black female hooker, has a tendency to generously charge half price on Fridays. Spends most of her time proffering leftist bollocks and sullen racebaiting comments!!

By Political Foreskin

January 19, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this

The collapse of the soviet union. attributed to Reagan’s Star Wars program? no sir. there was always a disconnect between official soviet news and the reality on the ground in Minsk and Moscow, but after the Kremlin’s Bushesque spin about the quagmire in afghanistan became so divorced from the soldier’s letters home, the institution that was the USSR eroded into nothingness, and no consequences could be impended on treason.

Like the Roman Empire, which ended up being but a cartographer’s doodle, people simply stopped being soviets. Like when John Lennon told Paul, “I aint no f’in beatle”. People just decide for themselves what they are when you remove the gleam from the institutional ivory towers.

Fortunately, in our country, we have a mechanism called elections that allows for the country itself to survive when the people lose faith in the spin.

That’s why Bush is finished. that’s why Newt Gingrich has totally separated himself from bush. Ginrich is like the Steve Bushemi character in “Reservoir Dogs”, who thought he could hide from the mexican standoff and massacre that ended the movie. he saw it coming and survived only to be nailed by the cops closing in on the hideout. Newt Gingrich might survive the political rinsing of the vestiges of neo-conism, but he’ll be nailed by the sentries of truth that are closing in on him, (the dirty little weasel-boy)

By @@

January 19, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

I can’t tell the real TFTT from the troll anymore..the troll has gotten the language, tone, and venom to a tee.

By Joe

January 19, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

Still waiting to see if TFTT can produce a single post *without the need for name calling and blind partisan cheer leading.

Or is this just your idea of debate?

Be proud of yourself. Your free pass to one side for the last six years brought us to this point.

By Political Foreskin

January 19, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

(o)

(now watch the freakshow, folks)

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this

Jim Wooten,

Sorry to be off-topic with my first post, but since you think that Political Foreskin’s daily trash has merit, I thought you’d enjoy his latest entry, which he made next door:

No, RW, you call Brian Curtis “brainless” because you’re a hack who stole the idea from Dye Brainless.That’s why you post to yourself all day long, and reply to yourself, because nobody, and I mean nobody reads you. Except your own aliases, and dirty fellow trolls, like dye brainless, fat fat, and that other 23 point criteria match for imbecile, Luckoblow.bwa-t-t-tard!

In case you’re wondering, “Fat fat” is his name for @@, who this worthless pos likes to nickjack, something he enjoyed doing yesterday.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this

JoeDim, you nasty little turd … you’re almost as anal as the other sad should have been aborted leftist tw@ts on here … these termites pathetically spend hours and hours posting the usual homofilth and sneers at (mostly) yours truly and some other conservatives. JoeDim is a dolt - I LMFAO off their leftist bollocks all day … niggling the lonely wittle wankers just enough to keep them going- kind of like feeding a crack habit … JoeDim’s empty assertions show what a dishonest rabid little wankpig he is … and cheers for the stock puerile defensive “hurl more insults at me shiite” … JoeDim - you lefty vermin are fabulous fun to goad …

being able to goad leftist scum into doing this all day long - even when I’m not posting - is priceless.

I am smarter than feckpigs like U bubbaturd - I trust that’s abusive enough for ya …

have a great evening working on the fries station

NOW F^ck Off!!

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this

DEATH TO THE ANAL OBSESSIVE ID stealing TROLL!!

By Van

January 19, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this

Political Foreskin,

You must be a true leftie idealist. No practical, rational thinker would ever buy into this dribble of nonsense.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this

@@,

Yes, the wanker does a good imitation of TfTT, but this blog is headed for nuclear annihilation if this atomic jacka$$ isn’t stopped.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this

@@

you see how easy it is to wind up the obsessive anal id stealer … a few choice barbs and its off and running. this is just Pavlov’s dog like manipulation

the more one varies the verbal pugilism, the more the obsessive troll — who obviously saves it/prints it out slavishly replicates it… WOT A SNIVELLING STUUUUUUUPID WANKER …

joey

all I do is mirror back the venom and LEFTIST “blind partisan cheer leading” on here from so many unthinking partisan lefties. your smug empty lectures are just that. when I see you actually upbraiding ALL the Bush haters for their unremitting bile etc … then you might actually have a point worth discussing. Until then you’re just an INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST leftist dissembler - with wholly one sided criticism.

now watch the inadequate anal obsessive troll mangle this post!!

By jbmlaw

January 19, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this

Dear JoeD @ 9:28, good question. Coburn and DeMint were where good-government advocates would wish; they are not late to the party. September 18, 2006 http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110008960

November 27, 2006 http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110009304

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this

@ joey

Goading leftist vermin hypocrites like you make for an endlessly joyous day you insignificant vapid marxist feckpig!! Is that enough venomous abuse for ya? SMIRK

@ Crap Crap

It has become blindingly obvious that dim bubbaturds like you cannot discern the ludicrous rubbish spewing from our resident anal id stalker from the intellectually superior and honest posts of yours truly!!

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this

@ the anal obsessive troll

come on wankface … tell us exactly how many hundreds of my trenchant posts and phrases have you commandeered and compulsively saved on your hard drive or printed out … and then feverishly drooled over BEFORE YOU ENDLESSLY edit/post them as I effoftlessly goad you into making a complete tw@t of yourself … over and over and over… LMFAO

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this

TfTT,

I’m a Bush supporter, but I agree with Joe. It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it.

Just a suggestion, but maybe you could try using an indoor voice.

By Charles

January 19, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this

In my opinion, Duke University’s Reade Seligmann, 20, of Essex Fells, NJ, and Collin Finnerty, 19, of Garden City, NY and David Evans, a 23-year-old senior from Bethesda, Maryland should go to prison just like the untold number of Negroes that the system has falsely convicted. I’m sure the authorities can find some similar transactions in North Carolina. Try Essex Fells, Garden City, and Bethesda. We can clear many of our unsolved rapes by holding them responsible. There is no need to be concerned with the evidence. We have the power to send them to prison and they should go. Release them after having served thirty years in prison. They can face the American public via television and state whether or not they harbor any bitterness. We can then get them a job with MARTA or some similar corporation to show how compassionate we are as a nation.

After their unjust confinement, they should be compensated monetarily by the state through an emergency fund. It’s only fair according to our standards.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

@ 10.57

Our desperately anal obsessive id stalker has mangled another of my posts. This putrid cretinous leftist snake has done a jolly good job of imitating my intellectually superior prose and corrupting it in order to silence his conservative betters…and they say that marxists like this tw@t are more open minded!! Such leftist TROLLS deserve a rightful place standing in the middle of I 285 waiting for a glorious and much DESERVED collision with a freight lorry!!

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

@ 11.07

This bleating and dishonest feckpig anal id stalker is unrelenting and is headed for a vainglorious end!! COME WANKER…DO US PROUD AND SHOOT YOURSELF…YOU MISERABLE LEFTIST AFTERTBIRTH POND SCUM!!! Your sad attempt at mimicking your CONSERVATIVE BETTERS will expose the desperate pinko rat that you shamelessly are!!

By Good work if you can get it

January 19, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

OK, so the AJC’s George Chidi is probably not the only reporter ever to get a trip on the company dime to cover stripping, BUT he gets my lucky dog of the day award.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

@ Butchag Danish

It has become more and more blindingly obvious that you are really a leftist saboteur posing as a conservative. Your and your boyfriend Rabid Wanker’s perpetual blather has ludicrously exposed you for the ignorant WANKERS that you are!! Now SOD OFF!!

By jm

January 19, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this

wow, it is amazing how when the Republicans are no longer first in line at the feeding trough they decide it is time to put everyone on a (earmarks) diet.

also, fighting an open ended, death of a thousand cuts war in a muslim country (afghanistan) contributed to the downfall of the soviet union.

By @@

January 19, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this

Jim:

I’m just stopping in to protect my @@.

The 10:35 was not me.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

@@,

Thanks for the clarification, although I stand by my response to the faux-@@

By Brian Curtis

January 19, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

JM: True, but realistically this was the only way to get “earmarks reform” instituted. It had to wait until the Republicans (who would be dead-set against it if they were stil the majority) were pushed into a corner, and the Democrats are stuck trying to look ethical.

None of them are happy about it, which is a key indicator that it’s a good thing for the American people.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

The Duke case is one of the most shameful modern events to ever to come out of that part of this nation. But let’s remember, it wasn’t just about race. It was about class as well. Those rich people. Duke U in the greater Raleigh/Durham area has a long distinguished history of class warfare and those people who can’t afford to live on the right side of the tracks. This case was a classic. We had some rich white boys from up Nawth who were going to show those dumb Southern demoncrats a thing or two in Durham. Those boys drive those BMWs and Audis with “W” stickers, and those people like that stripper who live on the wrong side of the tracks who drive beat up piles of smoking sht like a 1992 Honda Accord with a Kerry/Edwards sticker on it are jealous. *Those people have to get their revenge somehow, so they make up stories and go to the flaming p!ssed off class envy liberal demoncat from hell, DA Nifong.

Those rich white boys were lynched in the media before they even had a fair hearing. I doubt very seriously this case would have gained much fanfare if the alleged victim were a rich white chick from a privileged uppity New Yawk family. But mention racial and class inequalities, and you have a media hell storm, even before the freaking facts are out. But that DA was sure going to show them rich white boyz a thing or two about how to treat those people from the other side of the tracks. I hope he gets the hell sued out of him and the state of NC pays for it all. In any event, those rich white boyz are now going to be even richer with all the book deals and possible movie deal. Ain’t that a b!tch you jealous class warfare liberal neoMarxists?

Disclaimer: *Those people herein above two paragraphs is not reflective of any specific race.

Another major United States Navy Vessel gets named after a Republican president. Let’s see, that’s three for three now! A nuclear sub didn’t deserve to be named after Jimmy Carter’s candyass. The limpwristed liberal demoncat terrorist/dictator lover should have only had his name on a C.A.I.R. building. In any event, poor old Sick Willie will never have anything named after him from a federal standpoint with OUR taxpayer dollars. YOUR taxpayer dollars going to the military industrial complex with Republican names. Ain’t that a b!tch liberals? Heh.

“The focus always should be toward pushing parents to make decisions and accept responsibility.”

Ah yes, making personal decisions and accepting responsibility. That used to be the norm before the disease of liberalism and socialism crept into this nation’s policies. In any event, according to Pelosinanni and Shrillary, we Americans are too stoopid to raise our own children. Pelosinanni can run the nation and take care of our kids all on one freaking hand. Shrillary can speak from the Village Town Hall Gazebo and The Village raises our children. Our kids are being brainwashed in the liberal neoStalinist fascist concentration camps known as public education. Not long ago I posted a link where a girl was asked how people got their money; her answer was the government gives it to them. This is the sickness and warped thinking that must be reversed in this nation.

Visa tracking? That damned Bush and his privacy violations! The very idea! Of course, the second a dirty bomb goes off in San Freaksicko (Allah willing) what’s the first thing these candyassed limpwristed liberals are going to scream? BUSH DIDN’T DO ENOUGH TO STOP IT!!! Meh, I don’t pay attention to what the assbandits on the left b!tch about anymore. Meaningless. Useless. Worthless.

Voter ID? I have yet to hear one liberal ‘splain to me how in the hell showing an ID is voter or racial intimidation. These same jackals don’t wet their beds about having to show a freaking ID when writing a check or buying booze. These same jackass liberal neoStalinists don’t get their pretty pinko panties in a wad when having to show an ID to get a car tag. The correlation on why they b!tch about Voter ID while not b!tching about other ID whipouts is as straight as a San Freaksicko waiter. No, the real reason is because they know their shoe-ins for demoncat votes: dead votes, felon votes, repeat votes… the cesspool of their voter bloc.

Dirty Harry “Mr. Sin City Land Shiester Don’t-Tell-Congress” Reid and Nancy “$3/hr Canned Tunalegs” Pelosivich talking about earmarks and ethical oversights is a farce. The asspirates on the left are in power now, and everything they promised on “The Most Ethical Congress In History” have been flushed down the toilet to the sewers of liberalism. Barney “Short Man Complex” Frank can’t even keep his filthy RAT sewer shut long enough for a Republican to get a word in on the Floor. Filthy RAT vermin.

Paper DOES kill. The New York Slimes and Washington comPost have done more to damage our efforts in fighting islamofascism than ever. Every time Osama or that other islamotowelhead gets on TV, they regurgitate nearly word for word OpEds in those liberal hellhole rags.

Not only will we eventually have funerals for mink coats, we’ll eventually be able to marry them. The disease of liberalism will eventually grant mink coats rights too, right after they grant bestiality marriage rights to animals. After all, animals are people too. Sick.

By Julia Wallace

January 19, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this

Dear Readers:

Because of the language and lack of respect shown to others by users of this blog, I am leaning toward requiring users to use their names and verifiable contact information before posts are displayed.

While I am a firm believer in free discourse, this blog has deteriorated into being simply coarse.

There is a long tradition in newspapering of using language fit for a general audience. The comments posted here violate that worthwhile tradition.

Until a final decision is made, I beg you to please post responsibly. Passion can be expressed without filthy language. Thank you for your consideration.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:40 AM | Link to this

jm

Your intellectually dishonest post blatantly displays leftist vermin’s high regard for mohammedan thugs. The demoNcrat controlled congress will undoubtedly snigger and rabidly dismantle everything that Bush has rightfully done to keep this country safer. Leftist morons such as yourself glibly refuse to recognize the cowardly and reptilian nature of politicians like Jackasson, Sharptongue, chappaquiddick Kennedy and Pelosibitch whom you so adore.

In two years, leftist vermin will be exposed and DESERVEDLY sent back slithering into the putrid holes from whence they came!!

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

Ms. Wallace

Gently goading the resident anal leftist pond scum on this blog provides for fabulous entertainment. I merely replicate the intellectually dishonest bollocks that they proffer and throw it back at them. Allowing leftist trolls on these blogs is a sure way to jeopardise the much appreciated privilege that we on the right enjoy. I truly hope that all of our resident marxist vermin comport themselves accordingly.

By jbmlaw

January 19, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

Dear Julia @ 11:38, your choice of language offends me. I am reasonably certain that I have posted nothing coarse – pointed maybe, but not coarse. I think that is also true of most of our regulars. There is admittedly a second thread on the blog that gets pretty wild, but for most of us I think there is no language unfit for a general audience.

By Joe

January 19, 2007 11:58 AM | Link to this

Julia

I wish you would institute the changes you mention.

Question though. You’re really surprised? What has Mr. Wooten done to foster civil discourse? It’s rare for his columns to be anything more than partisan rants.

I recall his column where he announced this forum and his excitement in its prospects. What I see however is very little interaction. He drops a bomb then apparently sits back and watches the effects.

I realize the Bookman Q&A sessions are fewer in number and a different type of forum. At least in his, he will stick around, listen to opposing views and respond.

There are some posters here who at least make an attempt. Unfortunately there are far more who do nothing more than call names and Mr. Wooten is more often than not MIA.

By getalife

January 19, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this

Julia,

Yay, rules on free speech.

W and Newt will be proud.

Geez.

By Van

January 19, 2007 12:08 PM | Link to this

Julia Wallace

It appears that if we did institute your suggestions, there would be no lefties on this blog.

If the lefties stopped spewing that someone lied or history is wrong and we are are idiots to believe it, this would be a boring blog.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

so as expected the anal obsessive stalker slithers away from answering a simple enough question…

come on wankface … HOW MANY OF MY superbly entertaining POSTS HAVE YOU SAVED/PRINTED OUT?

Clearly its at least well into the dozens … to spend hours and hours editing/cutting and pasting my sparkling, witty, erudite yet oft sententious prose shows how ludicrously obsessional you are.

See the power of the written word - I fulsomely sneer and juxtapose witty/caustic imagery etc and you - like one of Pavlov’s simpering parrots now almost immediately compulsively regurgitate it. LITERALLY playing follow my right wing conservative leader!!

Knowing that an execrable twonk like you is sitting there, breathlessly and endlessly doing this is reward enough for a ‘job’ well done …

huge KILL ALL LEFTIES NOW SMIRK

Danish,

it is quite naive to (perhaps) think that the vast majority of lefties take ANY meaningful notice of any points made on here. Regardless of how polite or reasonable the tone. That rather beguiling notion seemingly reflects your own desired approach and/or (cyber) persona.

Making the exact same points I do in a slightly less pugnacious tone would NOT have any effect on dishonest dissemblers like Joey et al. When he and others on here actually start to similarly decry the left for their everyday anti-GOP bile and unremitting, irrational Bush hate on here, then maybe I’ll take note.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

Who let in Al Sore’s wife, Mrs. Censorship herself, Tripper?

Julia-

Perhaps you would find the Martha Stewart & Oprah blogs more to your liking. Like I tell liberals here, nobody is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to read this blog.

You can reach me at any of my dozens and dozens of verifiable Hotmail and Yahoo accounts.

By ICEMAN

January 19, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

Jim Wooten,

How dare you trivialize Ralph’s funeral. Has Ralph cut you off in traffic? Hacked your computer? Called you terrible names? Bombed your home?

He served no purpose other than to bring joy to mankind and he deserves every celebration of life he can get.

By ckt

January 19, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

it’s almost unbelievably funny how the right-wing nutjobs on here (and i’ll say this here, not all republicans are crazy, a majority aren’t - but things are just different here in the south) seem to believe that no “lefties” work. and yet they’re here, at 10 am on a Friday morning (which, I can’t remember, I’m a leftie, is a work day I think??) posting on a freaking BLOG on the AJC!

When will these crazies realize that NOT EVERYONE LIVES THE SAME LIFE YOU DO. PEOPLE WORK DIFFERENT HOURS, THEY WORK FROM HOME, THE OWN THEIR OWN BUSINESSES, ETC so they aren’t just unemployed morons. Because me, a “leftie” I work to cure Cancer in a lab supported by several millions of dollars worth of funding. So, when you’re dying of idiocy and your suburb diet of Chili’s and casserole, don’t come crying to me - this isn’t “work” apparently.. because I have a differen political idology than you, right?

as far as the duke case - I agree that Nifong should go - handled almost as badly as could be. but to say he did it because he’s a leftie and not just a publicity w*******, that’s moronic. what’s even more moronic you may ask? i say the mother of one of the accused who said, and I quote, “what’s so scary about this is how boys can have their lives ruined so quickly, and mothers should be aware of what can happen” i say, “mothers should be more scared that their 19 year old kids are drunk at a party with strippers putting themselves in these situations.

take responsibility for some of it - you aren’t an angel (ohh.. wait.. yes you are, you’re republicans! republicans are saved by jesus, democrats who reform are just waiting to fall back to vice!!!)

i can’t wait to move away from this freaking state… you nuts are ruining everything special about america…

By jm

January 19, 2007 12:20 PM | Link to this

time for the truth

Sorry to disappoint you but I am not a leftist. I do not believe in open ended commitments, whether they be social or military in nature. I also do not believe in giving unchecked power to anyone (unless of course that person has demonstrated the ability to walk on water).

I support a strong defense but I believe in judicious use of military power. There is a lot of truth to the saying “you catch more flies with honey than vinegar”.

Invading Iraq was not a judicious use of our military power. It was a classic example of hubris on the part of this administration. It also detracted from Afghanistan (and our “friend” Pakistan), where the people who attacked us were and probably still are.

Then again, if being against the war in Iraq makes me a leftist in your eyes, I will be glad to consider Pat Buchanan and Chuck Hagel fellow leftists.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 12:21 PM | Link to this

Joe,

This blog is called, “Thinking Right” not “Turning Left”, so I don’t know how Bi-Partisan you expect him to be.

That being said, I am a conservative Republican yet myself and others often disagree with Jim Wooten’s positions on issues, so we’re not in lockstep here.

You’re also free to leave any time you wish.

Julia Wallace,

I would welcome a registration system. The language is occasionally coarse, but what is worse is the endless nickjacking of other blogger’s names.

By It wasn't really Julia

January 19, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

I was just making the broader point. Who is Julia Wallace? Only the person who runs this stinkin’ newspaper. Here’s to hoping she will one day have the good sense to pull the plug on Markus and all you others. Proudly I sign, Bill Farmer

By Markus

January 19, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

ctk-

That was a beautiful liberal hissyfit. As Buy Danish said above brilliantly to “Joe,” if you don’t like what you read here, you are free to make like a sheep and get the flock out of here, liberal.

By Jim's a Distractor

January 19, 2007 12:32 PM | Link to this

Hi Jim,

Sorry to see that you’ve let your own supporters ruin the spirit of your blog. How many references to self-flagellation were you going to allow before saying something? How many strident personal attacks are enough?

This blog is filthy; I wouldn’t want my name on it as it currently exists, but I’d be fine using my real name if it were moderated. In fact, I think it would be an interesting little research project for some budding young reporter over there to analyze the content of the posts from those who support you most ardently vs. those who take issue with your stances.

We all know what the results would be, but it’d be nice to see them affirmed.

And now that I think about it, this blog is really a metaphor for society in general…when people know they are being watched, or when there is accountability, they will typically behave and play well with others. If they feel that they are unmonitored or can somehow supress accountabiltiy, they will lie, cheat, steal and abuse others until someone comes in and has to clean it up.

Cheers Julia!

Good luck cleaning up your nasty sandbox Jim. I hope it works out.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

jm @ 12.20

you have been suckered by the anal obsessive id stealer.

By rarringt

January 19, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this

Afternoon all,

It’s been a while since I’ve been on, but I wanted to chime in briefly on what I’ve noticed and have previously commented on regarding the tone in this blog.

Jim, if you recall, there was a discussion several months ago about imposing some sort of accountability to the posters on here in the hopes this blog would not devolve into the crass name calling forum that sadly predominates. Little if anything was done.

As a result, whether it’s to the right or left, there’s relatively little “thinking” going on, absent a few faithful regulars. Most others simply spew out vitriolic bile that is only considered “clever” or “shrewd” by those who are inclined to disagree.

TFTT rails against the alleged troll on this site who has misappropriated his/her/it’s ID, but the fact is, I honestly can’t tell the difference sometimes. I see senseless namecalling which does not move the discussion forward and only serves to undermine the credibility of the writer, and simply scroll to the next post. I imagine others do the same, which kind of results in a waste of Andy/TFTT’s time. But I do admit it is his time to waste.

My point? We have global issues (Iraq, terrorism, global warming, regional instability, trade), national issues (economy, health care, social net programs, infrastructure, 2008 elections, military concerns), and local issues (education, tax reform, economy, legislature, renaming Cynthia McKinney Parkway while preserving the roads/buildings named after secessionists/segregationists, etc.) that should take priority over how many different and clever ways you can call someone who has an ideological difference of opinion an idiot.

Jim, if you want real discourse to return to your once interesting blog, something needs to be done. I know your traditional point has been that no controls are necessary, open discussion is a good thing, and that the knuckleheads will eventually bow out of the market of genuine discussion. Unfortunately, the opposite has clearly happened. How many people who made decent contributions have disappeared, while a select few tend to poison what was once fertile grounds for debate?

We’ll be hearing Bush’s SOTU address next week, where he gives his vision (or version) of how it goes in the world and the nation. I think it’s time you did a State of The Blog assessment and determined if what we have is really what you wanted, and what best serves the subscribers.

PS. Good to see you’re still around, jbmlaw. As usual, I still disagree with most of what you say past “good morning, all,” but at least you have something worthwile to contribute. Same goes for CO and MSP. Liberal, Realist, RetiredLTC and others, you voices are missed. That means you too, Barbara. :^)

By Here's some more for ya

January 19, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

I’ll bet that George Chidi was a budding young reporter covering Lisa Ann Taylor and her stripper colleagues last night.

By r

January 19, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this

1

By Curious Observer

January 19, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

Julia Wallace,

Your motives are laudable, but I fear a registration system will do nothing to restore civility to this blog. Many of the worst offenders have multiple e-mail accounts and mailing addresses, and shutting down the privileges of one ID will merely give birth to another.

Perhaps a better screening system for posts would be more effective. A post that contributes little to further debate on a topic should be rejected out of hand. It is, believe me, frustrating to express thought on an issue only to encounter the riposte “pinko observer.” I suppose I should be grateful that I don’t encounter the even worse epithets thrown at some contributors who do not share Wooten’s political philosophy. If only conservative points of views are to be tolerated on his blog, he should say so at the outset.

By getalife

January 19, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this

It is Markus (time for the lies) that is the filth of this blog.

He smirks like w.

By Darth Vader

January 19, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

Hello everone. I’m depressed because CBS will not be showing “the Unit” tuesday night because we need more lies soved up our a$$.

By Ms. Writer

January 19, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

lol @ time for the falsities …. I got to you…lol made you mad huh? But for your information, since you seem to lack it, I am not a democrat…lol

By I'm telling you, it wasn't really Julia

January 19, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

It was me, Bill Farmer, but I’m glad it got some of you talking about being a little more decent on here.

By LuckoDull

January 19, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

By Julia Wallace January 19, 2007 11:38 AM Dear Readers: Because of the language and lack of respect shown to others by users of this blog, I am leaning toward requiring users to use their names and verifiable contact information before posts are displayed.

Julia: What about dull mikey’s blog? It’s just as “coarse” as this one is.

Or is this just a crackdown on the Cons again?

By Hey Wooten

January 19, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

Would you get on here and let everyone know it wasn’t really Julia Wallce, but me, Bill Farmer, who made the post.

By Van

January 19, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this

I see in the news that the lefties here will be having a celebration tonight.

“CARACAS, Venezuela — Venezuela’s National Assembly gave initial approval Thursday to a measure that would let President Hugo Chavez enact laws by decree for 1 1/2 years, a key step in what the leftist calls an accelerating march toward socialism.”

This must make them all feel great and wish the same could happen here. I can just see Madam Pelosivich deciding on which decrees to issue in her first 200 hours.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 01:02 PM | Link to this

CO,

If I may interject, your suggestion is completely impractical. I dont’ think the AJC wants to hire a full time Pravda blog nanny, and I certainly don’t want you deciding what has merit and what doesn’t.

Believe me, I have had many personal attacks lobbied in my direction (“liberal pinko” is mild in comparison) and I am theoretically on Wooten’s side of the aisle, so the insinuation that opposing views are being silenced is false.

Registration systems work fine at other blogs. There is nothing to lose by trying it here.

By SUGAR

January 19, 2007 01:03 PM | Link to this

Its a SLOW AND BORING no news day. Jim, you have my permission to take a half day off!

By Sam

January 19, 2007 01:04 PM | Link to this

By Markus

January 19, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

ctk-

That was a beautiful liberal hissyfit. As Buy Danish said above brilliantly to “Joe,” if you don’t like what you read here, you are free to make like a sheep and get the flock out of here, liberal.

I am so glad that there are people like you around Markus. The 10%ers that show and wear their ignorance and stupidity like a badge of honor without realizing that you are the morons that lost the country to the Dems in 06. The best thing that you can do for other Republicans and true conservatives is STFU! You sound like redneck central with your unintelligent rants. You, Buy Danish, and several others of your ilk need to go start the Stupid Party or something, before you give all Republicans and conservatives a bad name.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 01:09 PM | Link to this

Shrill Farmer…How appropriate is it that a glib poof such as yourself finds the necessity in lurking behind a female false id. DAMN!! I believes I learns my lesson now..LMFAO!

rarrington…Unlike other reptilian marxist trolls on this blog you proffer less bollocks and more common sense. I wholeheartedly assure you that I dont incite the venom slinging on this blog but rather it’s th fault of resident leftist cretin afterbirth such as aborted foreskin, NAMBLA, and maggot brain. I merely spit their venom back in their collective weasel faces!

Gleefully and gently goading leftist afterbirth pond scum is a fabulously joyous hobby and the utter shame is that this is not a salaried job!!

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 01:10 PM | Link to this

I’ve heard through the grapevine, (BBC) that on Tuesday night Dubya will finally admit to the US that there is such a thing as “global warming”!! I wonder what all the doubters of the theory of global warming will say now?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2023835.stm

By Randy

January 19, 2007 01:12 PM | Link to this

Wooten, I’m not ashamed to admit I felt bad when I heard Harry died. As a guy I also wondered if he was belly-up in the tank. Was there a toilet big enough?

It’s a guy thing.

Whale sharks aren’t aggressive predators. Your minks comment made me think of PETA. They’re carnivores.

Take a look at their diet. It includes librul fools.

PETA collected almost $29 million in donations in 2004 alone, but few donors understand exactly where their money is going. During the past ten years, PETA has spent four times as much on criminals and their legal defense than it has on shelters, spay-neuter programs, and other efforts that actually help animals.

A libruls oversite is self-indulgent.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 01:18 PM | Link to this

Ms Wanker…You feverishly attempt to goad your intelllectual superior(s) whilst ingnoring the mere fact that your verbal attacks and VENOM fail miserably to garner any extra attention that a reptillian troll like you deserves!

Your utter DISHONESTY and immaturity shows that black hookers such as yourself should retire permanently from political blogs… and instead better serve the world by gracing your natural habitat outside of the Five Points MARTA station…SMIRK

By JoeD

January 19, 2007 01:21 PM | Link to this

Van, If Julia is a real person, I doubt she was referring to the type of language you reference at 12:08. Mere disagreement and allegations about the truthfulness of this administration or the wisdom of some of its policies is not offensive, or shouldn’t be in free society. She’s referring to the insults, derogatory terms and just plain ugliness that infests some of the posts here. We should be able to disagree and debate without debasing each other.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 01:23 PM | Link to this

Sam,

Is this you?

“I do not like green eggs eggs and ham I do not like them, Sam, I am I would not like them here or there, I would not like them anywhere.”

That’s about how juvenile you sound, so I wouldn’t be surprised it if were.

TfTT,

I engage Leftists all the time at another location, so your theory that they don’t pay attention unless you’re “coarse” (as Julia would put it) does not hold up.

By ICEMAN

January 19, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

Randy,

His name was Ralph you mindless dolt!!!

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 01:27 PM | Link to this

I can honestly say that although there are people whose views differ from mine, that they are still classy when they either dispute my ideas or try to disprove them.

They don’t resort to hideous name calling, (a little name calling on this blog is expected), racial baiting, or being downright nasty. In the past I would bite back at them with equally nasty posts, (the “how to beat the school bully at his own game” mentaliity); but what was so heartening to me, and made me more apt to listen to their opinions and posts, was when Buy Danish and jbmlaw, (who are NOT one of my admirers; believe me), and a few others stood up for me.

That made a big impression on me — because they don’t like my stances or some of my opinions; but they were “classy” enough, (can’ think of a better word than that), to know the difference between a debate and a character assassination and just outright putrid hatred. There’s hope for this blog because of people like them. Classy people.

By jbmlaw

January 19, 2007 01:30 PM | Link to this

Dear Debbie @ 1:10, I will urge our government to do as much as it can to accelerate global warming. I’ve had enough winter.

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 01:34 PM | Link to this

Each computer has a distinct “URL” that they are using while on the world wide web. If Wooten truly wished to make this a blog of worthiness, he could always request that the offensive person’s URL be denied permission to access AJC’s server; or specifically his link on AJC’s server.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 01:34 PM | Link to this

Butchag Danish…keep up the attempt at condescending nannying bollocks…you glibly ignore that I could CARE LESS what vapid wankers like you have to say…

…the other day when crackpipe blackwhore debbie falsely asserted that she reported yours truly to the apparently omniscent “blog police” I could give a toss!

The simple fact is that gleefully goading leftist pond scum effectively and wittingly proves that this is the only form of communication that marxist afterbirth can UNDERSTAND and also to which they will UNFAILINGLY RESPOND…

Now please…again…SOD OFF!!!

By Atlantajan

January 19, 2007 01:46 PM | Link to this

‘Scuse me? The Republican Congress has had 12 years to pass meaningful ethics reform; a bill passes within the first 50 hours of the first Democratically controlled Congress in all those years; and, somehow, two Republicans get the credit?

Get real.

By Atlantajan

January 19, 2007 01:59 PM | Link to this

Oh, and by the way, Tom Coburn (along with Orrin Hatch) voted against the ethics bill.

By RW-(the original)

January 19, 2007 02:00 PM | Link to this

DDR,

I think you’re confusing URL’s with IP addresses, but it still isn’t that simple to block someone. Someone can use a proxy server that will let them hide their own IP address and you don’t have to have a static IP address even if you don’t use a proxy server. In fact many providers are using a pool of dynamic IP addresses because they don’t have enough static IP addresses to go around.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 02:01 PM | Link to this

Danish

I said “take meaningful notice” not that they “don’t pay attention”. By meaningful notice I of course (obviously) meant they actually concede factual/reasoned points made by the right. Very very few , if any on here do that - and if they do concede the odd point they still never seem to then logically modify their positions after such exchanges. In other words its essentially a complete waste of time debating/bantering with them. They either simply ignore solid, irrefutable points made, gloss over or minimise them, twist things or just simply attack the centre-right. Each to their own of course.

I agree we on the right might very occasionally adopt an astute, slightly dismissive stance to their posts… but generally we trash their arguments with reasoned argument/facts etc … my point is simply overall its pretty much a waste of time seriously engaging them. Especially given the leftists’ endless, endless repetition of Bush hate. Iraq bollocks etc…

maggot brain’s unremitting sloganising propoganda and obsessive lies etc about Bush, and moron rod’s systematic dishonest idiocy being just two of many glaring examples.

watching the anal obsessive id stealer continuously fritter away hours of its baleful pointless life effetely and moronically stalking me is freaking hilarious …

I GOT THE POWER!!!

huge death to all lefty stalkers smirk

By harold

January 19, 2007 02:01 PM | Link to this

So what. Can we buy beer and wine on Sundays yet?

By Randy

January 19, 2007 02:02 PM | Link to this

ICEMAN, I think you missed the point I was making there, little buddy. Mindless much?

Alright! Was RALPH floating belly up?

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

By IC

January 19, 2007 02:03 PM | Link to this

mo repukin vomit 2 choke on

http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/010907Floyd.shtml

By getalife

January 19, 2007 02:24 PM | Link to this

“VICTORY FOR BUSH:

A forthcoming Iraqi bill – essentially drawn up by the Bush administration – will “radically redraw the Iraqi oil industry and throw open the doors to the third-largest oil reserves in the world.”

Yes IC,

This is the biggest fraud and theft in world history. Investigations will lead to accountability for this fraud and theft.

Class action lawsuits should be filed for the Iraqi people and Americans damaged by these crimes.

Cheer on these criminals wingnuts, you are part of this fraud.

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 02:34 PM | Link to this

IC: I read your article, (a quote from it):

The new bill will “radically redraw the Iraqi oil industry and throw open the doors to the third-largest oil reserves in the world,” says the paper, whose reporters have seen a draft of the new law. “It would allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil companies in the country since the industry was nationalized in 1972.” If the government’s parliamentary majority prevails, the law should take effect in March

My question is, with the civil unrest in Iraq, how will this supposed ammendment prevail? The ammendment is probably not worth the paper it’s written on.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 02:40 PM | Link to this

@ Time for the Truth

I have feverishly enjoyed the relentless id “stalking” of the venomous reptilian time for the truth over these past few days. Whilst he truly and glibly believes that his style and prose of verbal pugilism is unique and superior, he fails to recognise the blindingly obvious fact this he is really not so brilliant.

He proffers endlessly how I may have copied and pasted a few past entries and such bollockschop, but what this sad pathetic piece of tory afterbirth doesnt recognise is that this is all free-hand. Since his style and British/cockney dialect is so unique, he is the easiest mark on the blog.

The insidious venomous language that I hurl is everything that he has said in the past. He has berated Debbie Do Right in the past and labeled her a blackwhore, he didn’t have the respect on MLK Day to refrain from referring to the man as a serial adulterer with the intent of subtly demeaining the man’s importance. His opinions are baseless and scathing. And lest we not forget, that his abuse of others is unrelenting.

What’s even more shameful is that he has never been held accountable for the poisonous rubbish that he spews! Well look in the mirror and see what you’ve created bubbaturd!

I have gleefully and successfully managed to goad and wind up our favorite English troll quite a few times over the past week including the spectacular meltdown this morning at 10.37.

I didnt spend a lot of time learning your style…it was blindingly obvious already. Also, contrary to what some believe, I didnt waste my time and sacrifice any time away from my daily responsibilities and errands. The opportunity to make a wanking a__hole cry presented a brilliant opportunity and a very glorious opportunity it was indeed!

Time for the truth…you are a filthy piece of trash who has no business spewing their hate on the Internet. Others manage to engage in debate in a more civilised form whilst you elect to slither in the mud and remain a dodgy, vile snake.

Cheers to you wanker! Now F*ck off!!!

PS

I may be back to borrow your id once in a while so please comport yourself like an English gentleman rather than as a cockney chav!!

By jbmlaw

January 19, 2007 02:42 PM | Link to this

Dear Atlantajan @ 1:46, it is seemingly important to you that Democrats get “credit” for passing an ethics bill, rather than analyzing the dynamic behind what was passed. I understand that after 12 years in electoral wasteland you desperately need a win, even if ugly or meaningless.

Until the democrats changed the law in 1977, there was no need for such “ethics” legislation, because presidents – for almost 200 years - would simply impound wasteful spending. The democrats passed a law that compels the executive to spend whatever wasteful spending they legislate, thus the spending explosion that eventually crippled the Carter administration. I respectfully suggest that you would have no need for such an ethics bill if the executive had the long-traditional power to impound – then the executive could be responsible for spending. As is, only Congress can be blamed for spending excess. I think the electorate properly rebuked the big spender republicrats in 2006, but I believe today we are likely to see a similar rebuke of big-spending democrats, perhaps as soon as 2008.

You also disparage Hatch and Coburn for their votes against the “ethics” bill. Please understand that an honest person does not need rules – the rules are needed only for crooks. Hatch and Coburn are perhaps the cleanest men in Congress; if anything, their votes cause me to assume something is wrong with the law.

By getalife

January 19, 2007 02:54 PM | Link to this

Well Debbie,

The Iraqis are very corrupt and this deal will mean millions for them.

I think they will get the money and run to another country.

By Van

January 19, 2007 03:01 PM | Link to this

DebbieDoRight,

You are thinking of a network cards MAC(Media Access Contro) address, the hexidecimal address burned into each NIC(Network Interface Card) at the time of manufacturing. As stated before, that is easily hidden by using a router or a bridge.

By Van

January 19, 2007 03:09 PM | Link to this

DebbieDoRight,

You are thinking of a network cards MAC(Media Access Contro) address, the hexidecimal address burned into each NIC(Network Interface Card) at the time of manufacturing. As stated before, that is easily hidden by using a router or a bridge.

By Van

January 19, 2007 03:14 PM | Link to this

getalife and DebbieDoRight -

Or it might mean that the Iraqi government needs to raise capital. Cold hard cash would go a long way toward bringing Iraq back from the rubble. THis infussion of cash could aid the rebuilding of the country and arming thier military and police.

It could be that simple or it might be part of dark secret plans of the Bush family to make money for their buddies and not for themselves.

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 03:23 PM | Link to this

Well Debbie, The Iraqis are very corrupt and this deal will mean millions for them. I think they will get the money and run to another country

I can understand that part, it’s just the part where the article states that Dubya is going to enter into a “contract” for a better word with an administration that, though they’re in power now, their political future is uncertain. My point was how could Dubya expect to reap any benefits from a country that’s on the verge of meltdown?

The only way this would work is if the plan was not a long term investment sort of thing, but a short term windfall. Meaning, Dubya is betting on staying in the “market” so to speak only a few months, reap the benefits, and then pull all the US troops out of Iraq.

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 03:28 PM | Link to this

Or it might mean that the Iraqi government needs to raise capital. Cold hard cash would go a long way toward bringing Iraq back from the rubble. THis infussion of cash could aid the rebuilding of the country and arming thier military and police

Hmm didn’t think of that. But couldn’t undercutting OPEC on prices have the same effect without “getting in bed” with Washington?

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 03:32 PM | Link to this

As stated before, that is easily hidden by using a router or a bridge

Man! If I would’ve known that I would not have gotten “axed” off this California blog, (it was pro Waters). Now I know!! Revenge is mine!! How do I get my own router or bridge?

By Political Foreskin

January 19, 2007 03:39 PM | Link to this

(o)

now watch the freakshow folks.

BTW: officially declared, Miller Time at 3:30 on Friday afternoon, Jan. 19, 2007.

I suggest tall cold ones. Those of you who have to wait till 5pm or 6 pm because you might get fired or arrested, dont worry, you’ll catch up, the rest of us will go slow (we will only drink with two fists).

By pharmacist

January 19, 2007 03:41 PM | Link to this

As a pharmacist that reads “hen scratching” and electronic trasmitted prescriptions, I can say that many more errors are made on the electronic prescriptions than hand written. Probably because either non-pyhsicians are inputing the data, or busy physicians input it wrong. We, as pharmacists, review and contact the physican if an error is detected. As for the pushing for more electronic prescribing, I think the real question is who is paying for all of this? Why are they willing to provide it at no charge? Pharmacetical benefits managers (PBM’s) make a forturne from drug manufactures to steer the manufacturer’s product onto a ‘preferred formulary’. They are paid a rebate for each prescription dispensed on their plan. The electronic prescribing web site is one more step where the PMB can intercept the prescription and have the physcian change it to the ‘preferred drug’.
You will be hearing more about how electronic prescribing will reduce errors, or save money, or streamline the health care delivery system, —- but the bottom line is —there is money to be made, and they are willing to spend big bucks upfront to provide this system at no charge to guarantee that they get it.

By Tammy B

January 19, 2007 03:49 PM | Link to this

Is that a nipple?

By getalife

January 19, 2007 03:51 PM | Link to this

I have been reading about Iraq since w decided to cut and run from the enemy in Afghanistan trying to figure out the real reason why he invaded and occupied a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

“From those earliest days until now, throughout all the twists and turns, the blood and chaos of the occupation, the Bush administration has kept its eye on this prize. The new law offers the barrelling buccaneers of the West a juicy set of production-sharing agreements (PSAs) that will maintain a fig leaf of Iraqi ownership of the nation’s oil industry - while letting Bush’s Big Oil buddies rake off up to 75 percent of all oil profits for an indefinite period up front, until they decide that their “infrastructure investments” have been repaid. Even then, the agreements will give the Western oil majors an unheard-of 20 percent of Iraq’s oil profits - more than twice the average of standard PSAs, the Independent notes.”

Its a win win situation if you read the whole article but what really stands out is w’s interview with Pelly and his gotch, gotcha, gotcha comment and smirk.

It is very obvious for those paying attention.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 04:04 PM | Link to this

WOW …

My very own extended, snotty unhinged hissy fit from the leftist dogturd id stealer. This chav scum even rabidly ascribes its own unhinged hissy fits to others.

I’m well chuffed!!

Fact is that you spent hours and hours perpetrating this over an extended period with regular (periodic) goading from yours truly … which means that you moronically allowed all this witty banter to get under your dolthish colonial peasantish thick skin. Happily there’s a very appropriate traditional English phrase which sums you up perfectly

“you’re a sad (sound likes runt)”.

P.S.

Don’t forget bollock chops, MLK was a serial adulterer and a proven academic CHEAT!!

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 04:05 PM | Link to this

Proud TfTT wanker at 2:40,

It’s really quite pathetic that you think that nickjacking someone’s name and copying their style makes YOU brilliant.

If you were indeed as smart as you think you are you’d manage to make valid “points” using your own unique identity, instead of stealing TfTT’s and carrying on like a particularly obnoxious punk.

It would be too much to hope that you yourself are sodding off for good.

By SUGAR

January 19, 2007 04:11 PM | Link to this

*It has become blindingly obvious that dim bubbaturds like you cannot discern the ludicrous rubbish spewing from our resident anal id stalker from the intellectually superior and honest posts of yours truly!!-TFTT *

Suddenly realised you are a cousin to the Oklahoma bombing guys and yu are in the woods somewhere. Are u a veteran, if i may ask?You need to get help at the nearest VA hospital.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 04:15 PM | Link to this

Well…it looks as if my rather inferior side has chosen to slither out from under that rock to come out and play. I have successfully goaded you and gotten under your skin to the point of ever so cowardly fleeing the blog!

A twisted little c%nt like you can never endure the heat…hence you always tuck your tail between your legs and flee like the pathetic invertebrate maggot that your are!!

You yourself have always spent hours on this blog…for the entire day many times…including the bloody weekends you sad little man.

Goading filthy chavs like you assuredly gives me hope that one day maggots like you will cease to haunt the general populace.

Now make like an East End harlot and F^ck off!!

By SUGAR

January 19, 2007 04:15 PM | Link to this

*I’ve heard through the grapevine, (BBC) that on Tuesday night Dubya will finally admit to the US that there is such a thing as “global warming”!! * The headline here in the states was that a delegation of the Christian Conservatives advised Bush to urgently confront the issue of global warming. That is where they get their DUMB Marching orders.

By IC

January 19, 2007 04:18 PM | Link to this

Debbie,

short term capital investment? Nope, a long term military committment.

By Van

January 19, 2007 04:22 PM | Link to this

DebbieDoRight

You can’t use one at the public library. Those of us working at home have our own wireless/wired networks. Try Fry’s or any big box (oops, bad leftie word) store, invest less than $100 and your in business - assuming you have your own computer.

Obfuscating a MAC address isn’t all that hard. If an old grey headed person can do it, I am sure those educated in Gerogia can do it.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 04:24 PM | Link to this

SUGAR,

It’s fascinating to me how you idiot leftists always manage to ignore the ID thiefs from your side of the aisle, and all the juvenile garbage that they spew, but you immediately hone in on the comments of the person who they have been imitating.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 04:25 PM | Link to this

It’s really quite pathetic that you think that nickjacking someone’s name and copying their style makes YOU brilliant.

Danish

I never asserted that it made me brilliant! However it is blindingly obvious that at times you could not discern the venemous bile that I was spewing from that of the other time for the truth! What does this say about the original English nutter on these boards?

This brit chav’s perpetual bleating and intellectually dishonest assertions and abuse has aided in creating a hostile environment in what should be a civilised forum of public discourse. Say what you want about me but DONT GIVE THE ORIGINAL ENGLISH NUTTER A PASS!!

By DebbieDoRight

January 19, 2007 04:39 PM | Link to this

If an old grey headed person can do it, I am sure those educated in Gerogia can do it

I’m originally from Washington State, (Olympia) — was not educated in Georgia, (except for college — Spelman Grad). Thanks for the tip though.

By Van

January 19, 2007 04:56 PM | Link to this

SUGAR,

Nearly everyone believes in global warming. Very few people believe in man made global warming.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 04:58 PM | Link to this

(This is a long one folks, but I am about FED UP with the liberals on this blog.

Well here we go again. Liberals (especially those who won’t admit that which they are) are wetting their beds here and attempting fascist policies of controlling what’s said on this blog (within reason) up to and including having people banned. About every two months or so liberals start wetting their beds on this blog and complain about the postings (those fact things that make the left look bad don’t sit well with liberals I suppose, that’s why I’m just cowardly called stupid and ID-jacked instead of actually addressing what I post). There is no civil intellectual representation from the left on this blog, just pseudo-intellectual liberals who think they are smart and attack you personally when you post something they don’t agree with.

Liberals (you know who you are) say they want the plug pulled on me and others as _ said @__. They say TFTT is out of control while conveniently ignoring the obvious sabotage of his ID by our resident liberal ID jacker and using the guise that they can’t tell the real TFTT from the jacker who thinks he’s posting like TFTT (what a clever liberal… like a five-year old). They say the language and tone of this blog from we Conservatives is out of line while conveniently ignoring past and current evils of very personal attacks on we Conservatives by liberals:

Our families and characters have been targeted for personal attacks; TFTT’s life was indirectly threatened by one of the multiple ID liberal sickos with a comment of “someone should slit TFTT’s throat…”. They tried it with jbmlaw several months ago when questioning his personal and professional life and they failed; they have tried character assassinations on Conservatives on this blog in the hopes that person would just go away in embarrassment and they failed (no, we’re not spineless candyasses like liberals… we can take it); they have posted with graphic and disgusting sexual innuendo language in attacks on Conservatives (Markus’ ”c^m-filled a^s”).

No, it’s the LEFT that has posted the most disgusting things on this blog. Why Wooten allows those disgusting pigs here is beyond me. All of these shenanigans by the liberals on this blog are to drag it down and bring we Conservative bloggers down one by one. They don’t want us to speak out. They want to silence us. They vehemently despise what we stand for and say. In any event, listening to the left on this blog whine about what Conservatives do here is laughable. They are the biggest violators here. They are nothing but a bunch of big overgrown bedwetting babies who if they can’t get their way of control and domination of thought, they attempt to destroy. How effin’ tolerant of them.

The left says they are all for freedom of expression and ideas; they say they are all for diversity of opinions; they say everyone has a right to speak his or her voice. Oh REALLY? Then perhaps one of you wallet thief liberals out there can ‘splain to me why you want AM talk radio shut down, conservative columnists like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin shut up, Fox News (cute little “Feaux News” as it’s called by you overgrown bedwetting babies on the left) to go off the air, and blogs like this shut down as mentioned at the top. You people on the left are for free speech right up until that speech chaps your hide the wrong way.

I’ve seen this mentality for YEARS from you liberals on the left, so don’t EVEN pretend you have no clue what I’m saying. You know EXACTLY what I’m saying. You people are doing nothing but attempting to launch a sneak attack on controlling/quelling Conservative thoughts and expressions. You people just don’t have the GUTS to say what your true intentions are, just like your heroes in the Pelosivich party. Now ask me if I give a good damn what you people on the left think.

There, I feel better now.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 05:07 PM | Link to this

Wanker tftt who sadly did not sod off,

You flatter yourself if you think I bothered to read your pigswill-esque effluence.

btw, you remind me of a certain creepy sociopath who enjoys stalking others.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:11 PM | Link to this

WARNING: I will now be stroking myself for everyone to see for the remainder of the time that this blog is open. Please wear protective eyewear as b.s. http links and fast flying fluids are highly likely

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:16 PM | Link to this

Sam @1:04-

First of all, I don’t care what you think about me. If you don’t like what you read from me, you can pack up your little liberal pink flowerpot and go plant seeds somewhere else like at demoncatunderground.com. Secondly, your Pelisivich party didn’t WIN. The Republicans LOST, and for good reason. They acted like a bunch of liberal democrats. Regarding your snide 10%’rs comment, I’ll remind you again that those who threw the democrats out in 1994 are still around, well over 90% of them. That was only 12 years ago. So go ahead and enjoy your “victory,” because that pendulum can swing back at any time. Remember that, Mr. pseudo-Supermajority Sam.

By time for the truth

January 19, 2007 05:18 PM | Link to this

Danish

OK love…whatever you say. I really don’t give a toss what you think of me…

…but remember who originally perpetually goaded you with the slur Butchag Danish…

By SUGAR

January 19, 2007 05:22 PM | Link to this

Nearly everyone believes in global warmingVan except u know who? U guessed it, the usual suspects who have to get their cue from a prayer.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:23 PM | Link to this

Anyone remember when an editor at Reuters got busted last year for doctoring photos during the Israeli-Pal war? Well it’s taken this long to fire the POS. Fake Bush documents, fake pictures for sensationalism. The leftist media knows no bounds and has no shame. But of course, Sandypants Burglar can stuff classified documents down his pants and get away with it. Just absolutely amazing.

http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/articledisplay.jsp?vnucontent_id=1003534746

By SUGAR

January 19, 2007 05:23 PM | Link to this

And speaking of prayer, does TFTT actually kneel and pray?I guess he uses another language then.

By catlady

January 19, 2007 05:24 PM | Link to this

I hope everyone did read the Emory article carefully. It talked about offering the aid to ADMITTED students. It can admit based on any (legal) criteria it wishes, including aid-neediness. I am not saying they will do this, but it would be interesting to see how many lower and middle class students have been admitted in the last 10 years, and then compare it with how many are admitted after the new f.a. policy goes into effect. Quite a few schools do not admit on a needs-blind basis, including some well-regarded ones. They protect their endowments. So, anyone know how many kids this policy would have affected this year out of the entering class?

By @@

January 19, 2007 05:27 PM | Link to this

Jim:

The posting day is drawing to a close here and I’ve read comments that suggest banning.

I have always been a great advocate of free speech. I choose not to read some from both right and left. To ban anyone would be taking from them what is most valued in our constitution.

Don’t do it Jim. It’s a trap.

When you do, they’ll have the ammunition to say that you, a conservative, bans “free speech”.

Registration would be preferable, but I see the difficulty in that, as well.

Namejacking…that’s the weakness. Those who are weak will continue to do it.

By Sonny Perdue

January 19, 2007 05:29 PM | Link to this

My fellow Georgians, I must admit I have been a pig, enriching myself at the public trough for four years. While I feel terrible about this, it has doubled my net worth, so I’m not about to stop now. What I will do is fire Dan McLagan, my spokesweasel, who is a troglodyte. Maybe that will at least get the AJC off my butt, so that you, the good suck… people of Georgia will not have to read about these land deals and what not.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:31 PM | Link to this

So THIS is what all the hoopla is about regarding meteorologists and global warming. Threatening to pull the certification of meteorologists who deny global warming exists? Isn’t that a little like Hitler mentality, or a LOT like Hitler mentality? The interesting thing here is that as I have mentioned many, MANY times, there aren’t many people that deny global warming happens and is happening (the same for global cooling). We have ice ages ever 10,000 years for crying out loud. But what the simpleton jackass liberals can’t get through their tinfoil hat heads is that many just don’t believe MANKIND is causing global warming in the entirety. Once again, it’s an example of the disease of liberalism and their religion of global warming.

http://climate.weather.com/blog/9_11396.html

So, if you are a meteorologist and don’t believe mankind causes global warming, you should be stripped of your certification and hung. Sicko fascist liberals.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:36 PM | Link to this

SUGAR says what I’ve been saying all along… THANKS SUGAR!!

“Nearly everyone believes in global warming Van”

You’ve got the eye of an eagle, SUGAR. Van SAID global warming exists. What separates people that think like Van from the rest of you tinfoil hat liberals on global warming is what’s CAUSING it. What happened to all those hurricanes that were supposed to happen last year SUGAR? Hmmm? We can’t even forecast a hurricane season and we’re supposed to know we are causing global warming? Hint: there is a corrolation between the sun’s radiation activity and Al Sore’s hockey stick temperature chart. Pinheads.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:42 PM | Link to this

Lefty Robert Reich, a former Clintoon cabinet member, says that the demoncat’s “ethics reform” that the media is having multiple orgasms over isn’t all that. You don’t SAY?

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=12385

Of course, the non-lib media won’t question Nancy “$3/hr canned tuna” Pelosivich on this.

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 05:57 PM | Link to this

@@,

I would disagree with you when it comes to ID theft, stalkers and unquestionable vulgarity from the stone-cold sociopaths such that Marcus refers to, although I don’t know that the AJC can do anything other than go back and erase comments after the fact.

Registration is the answer.

Wanking tftt @ 5:18,

I’m not endorsing tftt by any means, but he’s miles above you in that he doesn’t pretend to be somebody who he isn’t.

What’s it like to be so much worse than him?

By Political Foreskin

January 19, 2007 06:03 PM | Link to this

No, fat fat, the solution is to limit the # of comments per day. You comment 25-30 times a day. You’re a fiend. So are your troll friends.

Limit to 5 per day, and that will end all problems on this blog.

word.

By Markus

January 19, 2007 06:09 PM | Link to this

PoFo is a flaming liberal. Therefore, anyone who posts Conservative thoughts is a “troll” (on a Conservative blog… imagine the hell out of that). Those oh so tolerant and diverse liberals…

By LuckoDull

January 20, 2007 08:01 AM | Link to this

Letters to the Editor AJC:

Iraq war: Critics kill morale, but boost enemies - After listening to criticisms from the congressional Democratic leadership both before and after President Bush laid out the details of his plan to change the course in Iraq, I am totally convinced they want us to lose the war in Iraq for purely political reasons related to the 2008 national elections. For years, they have said our troop strength was too low. Now, they apparently think it is too high. They want to admit defeat via a cut-and-run approach. So if citizens can’t support the last and best hope to win in Iraq, remain silent. Otherwise they are simply encouraging the enemy to hang in there (as was the case in Vietnam) and degrading American troop morale.- JAY WAGNER, of Stone Mountain, is a retired Army colonel.

By @@

January 20, 2007 08:45 AM | Link to this

Jim:

Excuse me while I work my way in between you and your bloggers.

This will be my only comment of the day. If my @@ appears here, it is not “ME” posting.

Political Foreskin:

Your 6:03 comment made yesterday? 25-30 times a day? You have got to be kidding, right?

I took the time to add up the posts I have made both here, and at Luckovich’s.

The answer? 50, fifty…that’s FIFTY!!! over a period of 5 DAYS!!!!!!

Two of those were made here at Wooten’s yesterday. One to clarify for everyone that a post, although under my name, was not mine. The other to discourage Jim from banning free speech.

Your “free speech” under my name (you have confessed to doing it) will not come free however. When I’m around, and I catch someone namejacking my @@, I will point it out.

Your comment late yesterday at Luckovich’s labelling me as paranoid was hysterically funny given that you have claimed I post 25-30 times a day, and that has just been proven as untrue. I am @@ only. I am not posting under multiple IDs. I very rarely engage others in conversation, so how in the hell can I be responding to myself?

My late posts at Luckovich’s yesterday were nothing more than me having fun during a quiet time at ml’s. They were all made under the name @@.

You want to limit everybody’s comments to five a day so you can do what?

Put forth as many of your political pee-nuts as YOU DEEM appropriate FOR YOU? Go back and count them. They are tremendous in number and worthless to most everyone who reads them. Everyone keeps telling you that, but you’re obviously ^^^ preoccupied.

What a “little hum-yummer” you have become. There’s an infection in your “little head” PoliFore.

My advice? Stop drinking at your own fountain. The infection has infiltrated your other pea brain.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 08:51 AM | Link to this

By Buy Danish

January 19, 2007 04:05 PM | Link to this

Proud TfTT wanker at 2:40,

It’s really quite pathetic that you think that nickjacking someone’s name and copying their style makes YOU brilliant.

If you weren’t so utterly ignorant nobody would want to jack your nick. You are to dumb to realize that you are nothing but comedic relief. You shills for the ignorant wing of the Republican party are the Dems most potent weapon. Nobody wants a party with morons like you in it controlling anything.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 09:00 AM | Link to this

By Markus

January 19, 2007 05:31 PM | Link to this

So, if you are a meteorologist and don’t believe mankind causes global warming, you should be stripped of your certification and hung. Sicko fascist liberals.

Well damn moron Markus! Now that Exxon Mobil and evangelicals have acknowledged global warming, shouldn’t everybody? LMAO! Before long Markus, Buy Danish, and the other ignoramuses on this blog will be the lone holdouts on just about every concievable issue. What will we call them then, the .00001 percenters?

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:06 AM | Link to this

You know, I was thinking about Obama. What if he was an al queda mole planted here in the eighties? He could be our next prez, and he could possibly get our country involved in an unjustifiable war in a country located in the middle of a stinking desert……..oh yeah…..nevermind.

Clinton/Obama? Obama/Clinton?

I wonder how Diebold will stuff ballots in ‘08. The Repudlickans will probably only get like 37 votes, yet the neo-con media will show that it is too close to call, then they’ll hand it off to Scalia, who will appoint Newt Ginrich as pretzeldork.

I’m discovering that I really hate Joe Lieberman’s face. I used to think he was adorable.

Only two beatles left. Only one Mamas and Papas left. Why are all the stones still alive? I used to think that Brian Jones was the bomb, and that it was his songwriting that produced the Jumping Jack Flash/Paint-it-Black masterpieces. Wrong. Brian Jones was slow blues only (and jaz). I liked his stuff, but it was pale compared to Jagger/Richards. Keith Richards is a rock and roll genius, and how I ever doubted him…oh yeah, I stopped admiring him after the live album in which he played lead guitar really bad. My fraternity played that live stones album from the early 70’s every day for two years and I learned every misplayed riff by Richards. He was terrible. He must have really been stoned, man. The bogue brown acid rears it’s ugly head again, eh?

By bruce coker

January 20, 2007 09:09 AM | Link to this

I look at the AJC newsbreaks everyday. I am still looking for those big names that were involved in the sugarloaf sex scandal. I find it hard to believe that these two people that the DA’s office has arrested are the only two that they know about. I have been looking at what it takes for Taylor just to get by in her lavish lifestyle. It makes no sense. Show me those businessmen, politicians, and sportsstars, that you are apparently protecting. The people of Gwinett County should be upset by the waste of the peoples money on this nonsense.Give us significant arrests or shut up.

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:14 AM | Link to this

The mantra, “I dont recall”, has become the legal equivalent of taking the fifth when giving testimony in court. Reagan started it, and who knew that he was telling the truth, he really didn’t recall any details of his own involvement in Iran Contra. (cause he couldn’t recall breakfast). Who knew. We suspected, but I never believed it, but now we all know, yet nobody says or does anything.

What are you all? Tin patriots? Somebody has to DO something.

iran contra. our boys have been clowning around with that country ever since we installed the Shah of Iran and overthrew the elected regime that was in place. There’s no free passes where foreign policy is concerned. The sins of the fathers.

Why doesn’t somebody DO something? We are being led by blind fools into an inextractable catch 22/Fubar locked inside of a snafu/chinese handcuff thingie….

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:22 AM | Link to this

Okay, the surge: we wont even be able to question Bush about it for a whole year, because it will take six months to get it rolling full time. Then, Bush can answer any questions or complaints by congress with, “Give it some time, it’s working, but nothing worthwhile is easy…just have a little patience”

So it will be the State of the Union, 2008 before W has to make any decisions about the next phase of this surge.

Cautionary note: 911 backwards is 119. Now, if you know anything about Osama Bin Laden, then you know that he is a Saudi Baby Boomer who is steeped in US cultural anomalies. Like the way US baby boomers used to play beatle records backwards to hear the devil say stuff, man. Anyway, Osama knows this so the date of the next 911 could be 119, jan 19th. Now, this is the 20th so we’re good for this year, but next year, which falls within one standard deviation from the 8 years between attacks on the world trade center, (1993-2001), next year is a possibility. SO I urge our homeland security to be aware of the possible lunatic thinking that OBL may implement to attack again.

Just doing my patriotic duty.

word

By Markus

January 20, 2007 09:23 AM | Link to this

WHOA!!! @@’s total annihilation beatdown of Political Snakeskin at 8:45 was the best I have ever read. It’s about damned time someone put that liberal freakshow in it’s place.

SAM-

You are yet another ignoramus JACKASS liberal who can’t tell the difference between YES GLOBAL WARMING EXISTS and NO MANKIND IS NOT THE PREDOMINANT FACTOR IN GLOBAL WARMING.

Don’t reply back to me. You are another sick liberal prick not worthy of my time.

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:29 AM | Link to this

I went and gawked at the whale shark last summer. I noticed that it couldn’t really get swimming good and fast or do any power dives like a wild whale shark needs to do to stay healthy. Sharks need to blow it all out once in a while. So do whales. But whale sharks have to do it even more. If you look closely at most of the sharks in the Georgia Aquarium, they look like guppies in a little home fish bowl, and because you have to stand back to see everything, the actual size of the sharks is about the same as if you had your nosed pressed up against a goldfish bowl. the eyes would see about the same tiny monster.

So what’s the point? There isn’t one, except that Blank is like an Idiot when it comes to fish, or falcons.

I hear Blank is building an underwater home depot in Japan.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 09:35 AM | Link to this

Anybody want to see how jackass neoStalinist liberals throw a pantyp!ssing fest other than nickjacking? How about controlling the links on a blog? The flaming liberals at Daily Kos say no to Conservative links (someone needs to tell these assbandits on the left that Drudge was marked as left of center in a media bias study in negative story reporting on Dems vs. Republicans). But, when do liberals ever pay attention to details…

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/1/19/85444/6159

Waaah! Waaah! Communist liberal filth.

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:37 AM | Link to this

I first heard the term, “rush to judgement”, during the OJ trial. Since then, every time a guilty guy wants to plead not guilty, the first thing out of his mouthpiece is “rush to judgement”.

What does that even mean? Nobody rushes to judgement. We arrest suspects as quickly as we can build a case against them. What?

The best book yet to be written is not the Duke University Rape Case. No, sir. The unwritten masterpiece is about how we miscommunicate. how we mislead each other with buzz words and rhymed slogans. The book’s conclusion has to be that man is a easily hypnotized, critical-thinking-challenged lemming who will follow any chanted motto straight to his doom, even if that man hears the motto wrong or thinks it means something that it doesn’t.

hopeless.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 09:38 AM | Link to this

By Markus

January 20, 2007 09:23 AM | Link to this

WHOA!!! @@’s total annihilation beatdown of Political Snakeskin at 8:45 was the best I have ever read. It’s about damned time someone put that liberal freakshow in it’s place.

SAM-

You are yet another ignoramus JACKASS liberal who can’t tell the difference between YES GLOBAL WARMING EXISTS and NO MANKIND IS NOT THE PREDOMINANT FACTOR IN GLOBAL WARMING.

Don’t reply back to me. You are another sick liberal prick not worthy of my time.

Moron Markus. Au contraire! I am one of those Republicans and true conservatives that fully understands the impact that you and those of your ilk have had in the decline of the Republican Party. The rest of the country refuted YOU at the polls. Nobody wants a party anymore that panders to you .0001 percenters. And Markus, oh dumb one, it is you and your extreme minority holdout viewpoints that no longer hold relavency to more than a handful of like morons that screetch the loudest yet provide nothing substantive. It is you and those of your ilk that are not worthy of mainstream America’s time. By by Moron Markus.

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:41 AM | Link to this

Voter ID? How about if we just let people show their draft cards as proof they’re voters. Darn, I burned mine in 1969. Rats, and I would have voted for newt.

Oh well, the best laid plans of mice and morons….

By Political Foreskin

January 20, 2007 09:47 AM | Link to this

Physicians handwriting is illegible. Perhaps we could use that fact to let doctors write the riders attached to legislation bills so that nobody can read the earmarks and pork. that way nobody’s the wiser and we still all get our ill gotten gains at the expense of the poor.

Evil is good. it pays. it works. Evil is good. (greed is good too).

I dont understand why everyone doesn’t jump on the Cheney Halliburton band wagon, either buy working for halliburton, or contributing to the RNC campaign fund. Send them $10K and try to get access to somebody big. Your whole life will change, people will jump on your bandwagon. It’s so easy. But you gotta pay to play. What’s wrong with that?

By Markus

January 20, 2007 09:52 AM | Link to this

This is an addendum to my post yesterday evening about that liberal moonbat Weather Channel winch who wanted licenses pulled on meteorologists who don’t believe mankind is the large reason why global warming exists. (YES MOST OF WE CONSERVATIVES BELIEVE GLOBAL WARMING EXISTS. WE ALSO BELIEVE GLOBAL COOLING EXISTS. WE JUST DON’T BELIEVE MANKIND IS THE PREDOMINANT REASON ON IT’S OCCURRENCE. THE EARTH HAS ALWAYS WARMED AND COOLED). Sorry about that folks, sometimes I have to pound a few reality nails into the skulls of ignoramus liberals who like to LIE about what we Conservatives believe.

Anyway, a weather dude fired a shot right back. Sickassed liberals.

http://www.jamesspann.com/wordpress/?p=650

By WootenDull

January 20, 2007 09:54 AM | Link to this

Forthwith, at least on the weekend, I hereby declare this blog to be officially Dull.

Although wooten apparently disagrees with me, since when has this become Polly’s very own personal soap box, it’s virtual streetcorner, from which it can babble on and on about things only it can understand?

All the while, lashing out at the normal bloggers for “posting too much.”

Must we feed the animals?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this

Well whaddya know? A leading psychologist journal has an article about the psych of ideology on Conservatives vs. liberals. If you don’t want to read the entire article, I’ll give you a Markus Notes version:

Conservatives and their children are stupid and gullible to mind manipulation and liberals and their children are free thinkers with open minds. Please, hold down the laughter folks. It’s still early.

What they left out: a libokook’s kid is more likely to sit around and smoke pot than a Conservative’s kid; a libokook’s kid is more likely to be disrespectful, anti-law, and anti-society norm than a Conservative’s kid.

On the other hand, a Conservative’s kid is better dressed, more respectful of authority, and more likely to be successful and make more money than a libokook’s kid; finally, a Conservative’s kid who plays football can kick a limpwristed libokook’s kid’s @ss who plays soccer.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20061222-000001.html

An interesting side note is that there was not one mention in this liberal flamefest on why Conservatives are outbreeding liberals.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/17/INGEJL45D11.DTL

As usual, the disease of liberalism causes self-inflicted wounds… especially to the head.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 10:24 AM | Link to this

Oh wow. This is the newsbreak of the freaking century. In my wildest nightmares I’d have never ever guessed this would happen (and I hope it only stays a nightmare in my dreams). My jaw is on the floor in disbelief. You’ve gotta be effin’ kidding me. No way. Unbelievable. Grap the plastic tarps, here comes the multiple orgasmic media sensationalism…

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2810072&page=1

By The Way

January 20, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

Look, I’m no journalist, or even a word-smith, but I did say my ABC’s in school once for my teacher, and I only forgot one letter, the P, which was running down my legs. For a while there I was friggin Yates himself. My teacher learned…eventually.

By Randy

January 20, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

Eff’n aces Markus at 9:23. If this guy Political Foreskin can’t shut us up he tries to cover us up. He’s spamming the blog with multiple ids after @@’s smackdown. Pushing it up so nobody can read it.

Political Foreskin, READ IT AGAIN A*******HOLE. QUIT DRINKING YOUR LEMONADE.

By @@

January 20, 2007 08:45 AM

Jim:

Excuse me while I work my way in between you and your bloggers.

This will be my only comment of the day. If my @@ appears here, it is not “ME” posting.

Political Foreskin:

Your 6:03 comment made yesterday? 25-30 times a day? You have got to be kidding, right?

I took the time to add up the posts I have made both here, and at Luckovich’s.

The answer? 50, fifty…that’s FIFTY!!! over a period of 5 DAYS!!!!!!

Two of those were made here at Wooten’s yesterday. One to clarify for everyone that a post, although under my name, was not mine. The other to discourage Jim from banning free speech. Your “free speech” under my name (you have confessed to doing it) will not come free however. When I’m around, and I catch someone namejacking my @@, I will point it out.

Your comment late yesterday at Luckovich’s labelling me as paranoid was hysterically funny given that you have claimed I post 25-30 times a day, and that has just been proven as untrue. I am @@ only. I am not posting under multiple IDs. I very rarely engage others in conversation, so how in the hell can I be responding to myself?

My late posts at Luckovich’s yesterday were nothing more than me having fun during a quiet time at ml’s. They were all made under the name @@.

You want to limit everybody’s comments to five a day so you can do what?

Put forth as many of your political pee-nuts as YOU DEEM appropriate FOR YOU? Go back and count them. They are tremendous in number and worthless to most everyone who reads them.

What a “little” hum-yummer you have become. There’s an infection in your “little head” PoliFore.

My advice? Stop drinking at your own fountain. The infection has infiltrated your pea brain.

POLITICAL FORESKIN, THAT’S AN EFF’N ACE SERVED BY @@ AND YOU $HIT SPAM.

By Randy

January 20, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

Wooten, no comment on the Friday column. It’s Saturday but what was that whale’s name again?

Harry? Ralph? WhoTF cares?

Oh yeah. ICEMAN.

BWaaaahahaha

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Watching the same couple of pathetic resident snivelling lefties constantly whine and bleat and sneer and abuse us superior thinking conservative folks with their compulsive numerous cowardly multi ids is enormously amusing.

These sad anal blubbering cowards sit there making up countless idiotic (blatantly obvious) new personas day after day to gutlessly try and attempt hide the fact there is really only a couple of socially inadequate obsessive pinko dogturds who are doing this. But us clear thinking GOP types intuitively know this bollocks is the work of a decided nutter or two - endlessly talking to itself and agreeing with itself.

The latest maggot to slither into view is this moronic dickwad “sam” … sammy the cretinous autistic performing marxist lite seal has about as much political nous and vision as a demented energiser puff adder.

Arguably the funniest thing of all though is, after being repeatedly told by yours truly that I have DELIBERATELY adopted a certain tone and persona on here - these leftist afterbirth scum still seek to effetely excoriate someone who is telling them, repeatedly, that they are simply being deservedly laughed at and sneered at by someone who is enjoying goading them HONESTLY. With no subterfuge, no dumbarse 100+ ids etc. Just an HONEST, factual, fair comment centre right verbal betch slapping, explicitly and selflessly delivered as and when its needed.

LEFTIES ARE undeniably knuckle dragging SCUM … their witless, narcissistic, cowardly childish intellectually dishonest antics on here evince this day after day after day after day after day.

Watch this simpering imbecilic deranged pinko fool that has been fawning at the cyber feet of the lefty hating resident English Tory drool all over its screen with orgasmic delight at the prospect of once more dismally replicating a far superior, utterly apposite mode of abuse. This worthless tick, this bedwetting worm, this grinning transexual liberal sewer rat will doubtless once again spew its bile, as it hilariously anally imposes its noxious drivel on the rest of us. This anal wanker will now wank all over its keyboard, ensuring its aborted foreskin is able to flaccidly drip its envious stinky poison for all of its insane multi ids to gush and slobber over.

Its almost worth asking the likes of the filthy Cuban w******* child molestor redneKKs NAMBLA to come back and stalk us some more … with its loathsome treasonous reptilian mental midget side kick, the inimitable Bush hating parrot maggot brain, the thuggish syphilitic Katrina refugee from a LA medicare run insane assylum.

Its good fun typing a witty post up whilst watching the Fox Football Channel 3pm GMT live game … Newcastle Utd are already two - nil down at home to a lively looking West Ham. Looks like Roeder the Geordies manager is gonna get sacked real soon.

Chelski lost again at Anfield … so there is indeed an Allaaaaaaaaaaaargh … somewhere!!

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

Biggest lie, Biggest joke of the day:

Sam January 20, 2007 09:38 AM Moron Markus. Au contraire! I am one of those Republicans and true conservatives blah blah blah.

Silly Sam,

This blog is for adults. Find yourself a playground where some inexperienced and gullible child might believe your ludicrous fabrications.

@@,

It is not the quantity, but the quality of posts that matter. However, since he brought it up, PoFo the Pee-nut loses on both counts.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

BD-

Regarding Sam, sometimes it’s just best to watch our few resident multiple ID liberal socialist neoMarxist ilsamoterrorist loving demoncats hang themselves. They let their @sses overload their mouths every time.

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 11:11 AM | Link to this

Man this global warming thing must really be escalating.

But have a look at the video of her announcement. Rather than her “let’s chat” rap, please focus on the background. Look out the door. Presumably the announcement was shot in one of Hillary’s homes: Chappaqua or Georgetown. Now I know it’s been a mild winter, but even so, surely the leaves are gone from the trees and bushes in either spot. And check out the yellow spot in the bushes. At first I thought it was just a warm dapple of sunshine. But freeze the frame when, about 1/4 of the way through, Hillary says “how to end the deficits that threaten Social Security.” That’s not sunshine — those are flowers in bloom.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

I see a bigtime massive liberal p** coming over the horizon… soon.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 11:30 AM | Link to this

RW,

So, a right wing conpiracy that has foisted global warming on the planet makes a thousand flowers bloom on Hillary’s bushes in the dead of winter.

Hmmmmmmm. Reminds me of this.

By The Way

January 20, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

Global Worming is worse than global warming. Apparently trillions of earthworms are swarming all over the globe. (see today’s NYT). I dug a hole in my back yard, and counted 4732 worms. Went fishing. Caught an old shoe. I never could fish, not even in a stocked pond. (true).

Global warming could cause global farming. Maybe canada will be the new bread basket. The wine country is moving north as the globe warms up. The best oranges are now grown in Iceland. The best pineapples in Sweden. The best tomatoes in Minsk, which is about 500 miles from Linz where the best bananas are now grown.

Everything’s changing, becoming more risque, thanx to global porning.

By fat fat

January 20, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

BLOGGER ALERT!

DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS BY THE TRILLISH TROLLS ON THIS BLOG!!!

They may contain viruses, as I learned the hard way, not so long ago.

Dont risk it. Global Trolling, you know.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 11:58 AM | Link to this

By the Way fat fat,

Be careful you don’t drink too much of that “lemondade”. You wouldn’t want this to happen, would you?.

Pofo,

If you don’t open that^^link, you and all your aliases could be at risk of reaching a tragic end. Boo Hoo.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this

Global warming causes hurricanes. Global warming also causes no hurricanes like last year (I assume since no candyassed Al Sore pseudo-expert climatologists could ‘splain why no hurricanes hit in a heavily forecasted season).

Meanwhile back at the ranch, flashback to 1998 when Clintoon was in orfice… you know, that wonderful Utopian period when the world never had a problem with islamopig terrorists.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stm

Hmmm, I wonder why the change of heart all of the sudden?

“Using ancient tree rings, they show that 17 out of 19 warm spells in the last 10,000 years coincided with peaks in solar activity.”

Stick that reality pill up your @sses, you stupid man-made global warming liberal Jim Jones Kool-Aid drinkinng fascist pigs.

By Dusty

January 20, 2007 12:04 PM | Link to this

My thanks to a few of the relevant bloggers this morning.

@@-that was the best put-down of PoFo I’ve read. It was much needed. But like litter on the roadside, he keeps throwing it out.

LuckoDull at 8:01—glad you reprinted that letter to the editor by a retired army Lt.Col. He expressed my feelings exactly about the damage done by constant liberal criticisms of the President’s military surge plan. Wonder who will be the first liberal to say that the colonel thinks Bush is God. Happens a lot.

RW and Buy Danish—seems Hillary and Democrats are greatly interested in global warming, etc. No matter what is warming, Hillary gives me a chill.

I like the Senate’s plan to FULLY list earmarks on bills. They cost us a LOT. The Democratic bill only wanted 5% of them listed. 5%!! Thanks, Jim, for mentioning that good approval in the Senate. I, too, hope it becomes law.

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

A belated and hearty Happy Birthday to you! I heard the Manischewitz was flowing and a good time was had by all*.

.

*Except those that had to drink the Manischewitz.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

You have inspired me to write a little poem for PoFo -

Psychogenic polydipsia Pofo the Pee-Nut has.

No wonder his writing suffers and his spam’s so freaking bad.

How fitting that he has an alliterative disease.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Now we have our resident multiple ID communist filth saying links we send out are virus laden. This just keeps getting BETTER AND BETTER.

It must really SUCK@SS to have a mindset so low that you are afraid of other people’s opinions. But alas, that’s the sickness of liberalism we know best.

By JJG

January 20, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

Why don’t all of you nutcases, scumbags and lunatic fringe turn off your computers, get over yourselves and quit pretending that any of your drivel and silly opinions matter. Go outside and play! And close the door behind you!

By WootenDull

January 20, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

By Political Foreskin January 20, 2007 11:45 AM BLOGGER ALERT!DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS BY THE TRILLISH TROLLS ON THIS BLOG!!! They may contain viruses, as I learned the hard way, not so long ago.

I often wonder if a virus could be any worse then having this blog defiled with Polly’s 24/7 non stop bullsh!t, much the way cockroaches and termites will infest the foundation of a brand new house.

In fact, I sometimes hope for a virus as maybe it will wipe away the rot from this scourge, leaving only the sane comments from the adults so that we may participate in a serious thoughtful political debate, free from this lunatic’s spam.

To take it even a step further, I’m fully willing to accept an increase in my state taxes if it means that the government will provide more mental health care and this Polly Pestilence will receive the treatment that it so obviously and desperately is in need of.

Any of the above will work for me.

Hell, let’s save all the trouble and just petition wooten to boot this mofo.

What do you say Jim?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this

Another new ID from our freakshow liberal! What’s up snookums, that FACT thing chapping your liberal flamingass the wrong way? GOOD.

This is our blog, you sick pathetic liberal.

By Randy

January 20, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this

I have a question about computer mouses. Mine won’t hold a highlight and forces me to click multiple times to access a link.

Do the damn things need replacing when they do that or is it in the system? Keep in mind I know squat about computers.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

Randy,

You and your friends do not know squat about anything.

“Some of corporate America’s biggest names, including Alcoa, General Electric and DuPont, will urge the US Congress next week to act swiftly to help offset global warming, an environment partnership said.”

By Randy

January 20, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this

I’ll save everybody the trouble of answering. Just as soon as I hit the post box I’m stepping on the damn rodent and going to get a new one.

By Dusty

January 20, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this

Ah RW,

The party continues!!! Tonight it is Chinese buffet!! Glad you reminded me about the most enjoyable Manichevitz (nectar of the gods). I will buy it TODAY since it doesn’t sound like a Chinese staple. But I am mucho happy with the fine greetings!! Thanks.

BuyDanish,

Love to see poetry in bloom. I’m impressed. Don’t know whether our local word masters will go for “polydipsia”. But I concur with you that it is a serious malady. Sadly, the local yokel PoFo is much afflicted. We ALL feel his painful laments.

By WootenDull

January 20, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

By getalife January 20, 2007 12:31 PM Randy, {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{You and your friends do not know squat about anything.}}}}}}}}}}}}} “Some of corporate America’s biggest names, including Alcoa, General Electric and DuPont, will urge the US Congress next week to act swiftly to help offset global warming, an environment partnership said.”

Gee, I wonder if it’s because Alcoa, General Electric and DuPont stand to make a fat profit from “global warming?”

Off of the dullards leading our government.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By fat fat

January 20, 2007 12:41 PM | Link to this

I think I can field that question, if nobody minds, from Randy.

Randy, that isn’t a mouse you are clicking. What you are holding has been referred to as a one-eyed mouse in the past, but trust me, you wont get to any links by fondling it. The actual computer mouse is over on the right, it looks like a pod thingie, and it rests on a pad. Okay, that still could confuse the average joe and he could still grab the wrong mouse.

Maybe I should let the trolls tell you, they are experts with their hands.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

“Some of corporate America’s biggest names, including Alcoa, General Electric and DuPont, will urge the US Congress next week to act swiftly to help offset global warming, an environment partnership said.”

What a liberal crock. During the Clintoon years THIS was said about global warming:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stm

Follow the money trail as a realist says here as I have said many times. This is all about corporate feel good appeasement… like bragging about how much they contribute to liberal charities. PHBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT. It’s all about image.

By Andy

January 20, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this

…..and that’s how you get sociopaths to expose themselves to the blog.

Now they’ll spin until they fall over.

What do you think, too easy?

By getalife

January 20, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this

Dull,

Corporate gets what corporate wants.

They own government idiot.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Happy Birthday! My invitation must have gotten lost in the mail. It’s such a shame that I missed the manichevitz.

WootenDull,

That’s exactly right. These idiots on the Left are so freaking gullible.

I just wish that Big Pharma and Haliburton could figure out a way to benefit from global warming’s taxpayer funded largesse.

How fun it would be to see these evil corporations suddenly become the Useful Idiots’ best friend.

By Reality Sandwich

January 20, 2007 01:01 PM | Link to this

They’ve discovered an ancient Starbucks type cafe in Ancient Roman Ruins. Apparently what Julius Caesar said was, “Vini Vidi Venti”, (I came, I saw, I had a latte)

Do you people realize how much gall you’d have to have to say something like that?

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 01:07 PM | Link to this

Jim Wooten has proved beyond any doubt one firmly held conservative belief. That being that you get more of an activity that you reward. Of course it’s usually applied to cutting taxes to stimulate more economic activity and such.

Wooten used a different example and by rewarding Polly Prepuce he has indeed gotten more of that activity. It’s been proven so well that the name of this blog might as well be changed from Thinking Right to Polly’s Playpen.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 01:07 PM | Link to this

“Freaking gullible, useful idiots”

Yep, that is the wingnuts in a nut shell.

Oh, the irony.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 01:18 PM | Link to this

To the Victors Go the Spoils of War: British Petroleum, Shell and Chevron Win Iraqi Oil Contracts.

Yep, gullible, useful idiots believe that freedom and democracy crap.

Geez.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

The liberal cackling hens on The View are now wetting their panties over American Idol. Why? Because the judges are just too harsh. Waaaaaah. The world of liberalism says you can’t offend anyone. If you do, you should be shut the hell up. And to think these jackasses on the left call Conservatives “nazis.” Well, here’s another example of the disease of liberalism that’s infesting this nation and rotting it’s strength from the inside out.

“I don’t think America likes to watch people be ridiculed, made fun of, and called ugly monkeys, or that they’re too fat or they’re a degenerate… it’s an absurd concept that this is what’s tolerable now as consumption in America for mass media.”

http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/rosie-odonnell-and-the-view-blast-idol-judges-and-producers-4583.php

That’s freaking ironic coming from Rosie’s flaming liberal mouth… Republicans and Conservatives are called that daily here and elsewhere… and worse with threats of personal retribution.

By Dusty

January 20, 2007 01:26 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I’m sorry about your invitation. It was written in perfectly legible Chinese. Come on over. You DID NOT miss the Manichevitz. I am saving some for you.

I thought I alone was funding Big Pharma’s largesse. Those people know how to charge. There is no such thing as a thrifty prescription.My “largesse” (ha) is under attack and I’m healthy. Just a rare “bug” in the family costs beaucoup bucks.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 01:32 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

This is what your link says. (Note the operative word which I have bolded for you, since you must have been too bleary-eyed to have caught it the first time):

*Shell along with Chevron, BP and seven other oil giants, have won contracts to buy Iraq’s new oil production of Basra Light crude.

You do understand the difference between Buy and Take don’t you?

Moreover, this article is bit*ching that Putin’s Russia was shut out of contracts to buy oil.

What does that tell us about you, and where your interests lie?

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 01:36 PM | Link to this

Marcus,

Not only that but AI’s ratings are through the roof, so Rosies assertion that no one wants to watch it is flat-out wrong.

If Rosie can’t even correctly predict the viewership of AI, how can we trust these idiots and their dire predictions on topics like global warming and the Iraq War?

By Markus

January 20, 2007 01:37 PM | Link to this

“British Petroleum, Shell and Chevron Win Iraqi Oil Contracts.”

Oh BFD. As opposed to WHO ELSE should have been awarded those contracts? The New York Slimes? The Washington comPost? Air America? Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream? Hajid’s Corner Gas & Grub Mart?

Stupid neoStalinist liberals.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 01:43 PM | Link to this

Gawd, you really are a gullible, useful idiot BD.

The pundits are starting to write about this fraud so get use to it.

Russia and China have signed contracts with Iran idiot.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 01:48 PM | Link to this

BD-

“If Rosie can’t even correctly predict the viewership of AI, how can we trust these idiots and their dire predictions on topics like global warming…”

These morons can’t even ‘splain why we had not one single hurricane last year when the season was forecasted to be as big if not bigger than ‘05. The disease of liberalism is based upon emotions, not facts and knowledge. Liberal ideology is based upon the thought process at the time. For that reason alone, I flush anything a liberal says right down the toilet.

By @@RW@@

January 20, 2007 01:53 PM | Link to this

Dorkus just cant help himself. he’s trying too hard to matter, but he doesn’t mattah….he’s the acuna matata of the blog….bwa-t-t-tard!

You morons dont know anything about Iran or China you only read disinformation and then think you’re informed. You’re not informed, you’re deformed. An evil midwife must have stuck a crack pipe up your azz’s when you were born. Oh the humanity.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 01:53 PM | Link to this

“Russia and China have signed contracts with Iran idiot.”

No sh!t. I wonder if that has anything to do with Iran having their weapons? Maybe we should ask Kofi the Korrupt about that… and North Korea while we’re at it.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,244799,00.html

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 01:58 PM | Link to this

Russia and China have signed contracts with Iran idiot.

Getalife,

Um, what’s your point? You’re sorry that they don’t control Iraq’s contracts too?

Or are you going to say that if we are forced to go into Iran to knock out their nuclear capabilities and/or snuff out Iran’s support of terrorists who threaten us like Hezbollah, that it is only to get the oil contracts out of the hands of our fickle trading partners?

BTW, I could not care less what your “pundits” say, other than to provide an endless source of amusement.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 01:58 PM | Link to this

macaca,

We sold them parts for their missiles idiot.

Faux is wingnut entertainment for idiots like you.

Geez.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:04 PM | Link to this

Uh oh, the resident liberal neoStalinist ID pot smoker jacker is at it again. God I love free speech.

When they can’t debate, they menstruate and perpetuate their existence with pseudo-validation that they are their own gods and everyone else not like them is stupid.

Fortunately, these liberal geniuses are breeding themselves right the hell out of existence. Too sweet.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 02:06 PM | Link to this

RW,

You’re so right about Wooten’s blog being Political Foreskin’s playground, thanks to Wooten’s inexplicable encouragement of the unfunny little punk who strikes again @ 1:53, one of countless other I.E.D.s he has lobbed today.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

The fact of the matter is this war is a fraud.

Every lie w spewed, you wingnuts swallowed hook, line and sinker.

Guillible, useful idiots indeed.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Who sold the Chinese parts for their missiles that just yesterday blew up a satellite?

Does the name “Loral Space” ring a bell with you? How about “Clinton campaign contribution scandals”? “Ron Brown and commerce Department”.

Hello. Hello. Is anyone there?

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:17 PM | Link to this

“We sold them parts for their missiles idiot.”

Before or after a November ‘04 Tehran agreement to cease uranium enrichment (and the IAEA issued Iran a clean bill of health)?

They also have 77 F-14 Tomcats rotting in the desert that we sold them in the 1970s. And that has exactly what to do with the hump of a camel gitmolife?

By Correct

January 20, 2007 02:18 PM | Link to this

I do believe getalife trumped you on that one. We definately did sell Iran nuclear technology and other offensive weapons in the 80s. What do you guys think the big issue was with Iran/Contra. Not Contras. It was the technology sold to the Iranians.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:20 PM | Link to this

Answer the question since you brought it up, spitmolife-

“British Petroleum, Shell and Chevron Win Iraqi Oil Contracts.”

Oh BFD. As opposed to WHO ELSE should have been awarded those contracts? The New York Slimes? The Washington comPost? Air America? Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream? Hajid’s Corner Gas & Grub Mart?

By getalife

January 20, 2007 02:22 PM | Link to this

Oh please BD,

w is selling out to China.

Who do you think is funding his fraud?

Gullible, useful idiot indeed.

By Boot Dull Polly!

January 20, 2007 02:25 PM | Link to this

By getalife January 20, 2007 12:46 PM Dull, Corporate gets what corporate wants. They own government idiot.

getalife: Don’t get upset, don’t get angry, just consider this carefully:

If these people “own” government and “get whatever they want,” then why are you libs giving them a shot at the “global warming” bloodbath?

Are we letting the inmates run the asylum?

By getalife

January 20, 2007 02:25 PM | Link to this

macaca,

After, try reading sometimes.

Gawd, you are ignorant.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 02:27 PM | Link to this

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:04 PM

Fortunately, these liberal geniuses are breeding themselves right the hell out of existence. Too sweet.

Markus you have got to be the absolute dumbest poster on this blog. Remember the 06 elections dumb azz? The only thing that is breeding itself out of existence are you .0001 percenters that just need to STFU before you totally destroy the Republican party. It is you and those of your ilk that gave this country to the Dems in 06. You are a bunch of lemmings that just don’t have the gray matter to realize that you are the Dems best friends. All they have to do is stay silent and you will scare the hell out of mainstream Americans with your lunacy. You guys are the very personality type that every communist, fascist, and dictator depends upon. Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro would not exist today were it not for lemmings like you guys. Fortunately “conservatives” like you are practically extinct now.

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 02:27 PM | Link to this

So TOW missiles are now nuclear arms?? sheesh!

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:29 PM | Link to this

TOWS an HAWKS. Boy, those were some real serious internationally threating weapons we sold Iran during the arms “scandal” weren’t they?

“Only 18 HAWKs were delivered to Iran, instead of the planned 80. These 18 HAWKs were not what the Iranians wanted. The Iranians had been given the impression that the I-HAWKs'' (improved HAWKs) were capable of shooting down planes at high altitudes. They were not. To make matters worse, the missiles carried IsraeliStar of David” markings, which angered the Iranians. No hostages gained their freedom.”

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/part_i.htm

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/tow.htm

Don’t ever let FACTS get in the way of the emotionalism of liberalism.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:31 PM | Link to this

Damn ya beat me to the punch RW on TOW missiles! These over-estrogened liberals are just too easy…

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 02:37 PM | Link to this

Our own imbecillic thuggish Katrina refugee maggot brain apparently has a far too short memory…hardly surprising given the dim nature of this glib BUSH HATING lefty…

Maggot brains intellectual dishonesty in regards to China is blidingly obvious whilst he conveniently and negligently ignores alSore and Klinton’s blatant treasonous selling of military secrets! TREASONOUS marxist pond scum like maggot brain will enjoy a massive collective ejaculation of glee once the US falls under the control of mohammedan ragheads!!

Lets all now anxiously wait and observe our resident anal tory hating marxist scum to steal my id and mangle my post!! SHOW YOURSELF you cowardly marxist afterbirth anal drippage!!

By Curious Observer

January 20, 2007 02:40 PM | Link to this

While it is always pleasing to see new people visiting Wooten’s blog, it is obvious that some of them do not understand the rules for posting messages. For their benefit, I am providing a rudimentary list of rules by which their visits can become more enjoyable and less confusing:

These are the basic rules. You can learn more as you gain experience with Wooten’s blog. Welcome, and happy blogging.

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 02:46 PM | Link to this

LISTEN UP SLIMEBALLS!!!

You whiney sickening neo-cons, like Markus, Buy Danish and WootenDull, are like cockroaches!! You must be stepped on!! Now that there is a war on, it gives us just the excuse we need to completely eradicate you worthless fvcknuts!!

You gutless little girls can take it to the bank when I say that their are REAL patriots in this great country who have the stomach and the will to cut your little nuts off and stuff them down your disgusting mouths!! You traitorous pieces of crap deserve even less than what we did the facists and commies!!

We will never, ever stop in our efforts to hunt you treacherous vile animals down and eliminate you from the gene pool!!

Sleep well girls. God Bless the USA!

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 02:47 PM | Link to this

Fortunately “conservatives” like you are practically extinct now.

Silly Sam,

What was that bit you tried on us earlier about you being a “Republican”? Perhaps you’d like to share with us what it is about the Republican platform that you agree with.

Next, can you explain how it is that the people who actually voted for Republicans (like me!) are responsible for Democrats re-taking power?

This may be a bit too logical for you, but I think it was the people who sat on their a*******es and didn’t vote at all that swayed the election.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 02:53 PM | Link to this

Curious Observor,

You forgot the unspoken rule about being pithy. Woops.

Anyway, I think PoFo has already been dealt with quite handily.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:55 PM | Link to this

Curious Observer, et. al. ID-

That was beautiful. There’s just one small factor you conveniently overlooked: Conservatives on this blog don’t take what is said on this blog with life-dependent seriousness.

You liberals on the other hand, have some serious personal issues to address as you take this blog WAY too seriously.

Anyone who feels they have to dig into personal attacks including families and alleged occupations in any shape or faction on this blog has DEFINITELY taken this blog too seriously.

Now I’ll challenge any of you liberals right now who you think has taken things to a more personal level on this blog… liberals or conservatives.

My comment here yesterday afternoon said it all.

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 02:56 PM | Link to this

pinko observo…Cheers to your unhinged HISSY FIT @ 2.40! I especially took note of the dodgy but not so subtle reference to yours truly…

…WINDING UP pinko vermin like you is fantastically fun and fabulously compliments this rather glorious day of football!

Pinko observer’s endless sullen yet sissy bleating may find a better place on the MOMania blog!!

By Markus

January 20, 2007 02:58 PM | Link to this

Resident liberal ID jacker-

*”You whiney sickening neo-cons, like Markus, Buy Danish and WootenDull, are like cockroaches!! You must be stepped on!! Now that there is a war on, it gives us just the excuse we need to completely eradicate you worthless fvcknuts!!

You gutless little girls can take it to the bank when I say that their are REAL patriots in this great country who have the stomach and the will to cut your little nuts off and stuff them down your disgusting mouths!!”*

You are more than welcome to come to my front door and tell me that to my face. I’ll be waiting for you and your ilk with open arms.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 03:05 PM | Link to this

Don’t worry folks, the post at 2:46 has been reported to the proper authorities. For the record, the trail of attempted personal information gathering has been marked for some time now. I smell a serious legal issue brewing on the horizon.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 03:08 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish I am a true Republican and conservative. Small government, stay out of the lives of the citizenry, and fiscal responsibility. All of which the present administration DOES NOT and HAS NOT advocated. Under this new breed of psuedo republican and psuedo conservative crowd not one tenet of republicanism or conservatism has been adhered to. And yes, true conservatives saw and recognized this and spoke loudly and clearly in the 06 election. I think maybe you should tell us in what way the present administration has adhered to the true conservatism of Barry Goldwater. And Buy Danish, the turnout for the last elections was no less than previous elections. If anyone stayed home, it was an intentional shot across the bow of a republican party that turned away from its basic tenets. Maybe they could not vote against the republican party, but they damn sure were not going to vote for it either. Buy Danish, it you and the .0001 percenters that have have no understnading whatsoever of what true conservatism or republicanism is. You lemmings played a major role in the demise of the party in 06. You are so far out of the mainstream that you scare the hell out of normal people. Nobody wants someone so far out on the fringe affecting their lives to any degree. Get used to it Buy Danish. To win the republican party has to move way closer to the middle and as far away from the lunatic fringe as it can get to survive.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 03:11 PM | Link to this

Sgt. Badass,

Ever see The Crying Game?

Since you’re having a gender identity problem, you may want to think about who you’ve been sleeping with. And beware of people who frequent the Star Bar.

Marcus,

The punk “Sargeant” also stole that line from me, which not coincidentally I used against PoFo recently when I suggested that he may want to find one of these “insurgents” who ‘are not a threat so why are we in Iraq’ and find out for himself what happens when you run into one of them somewhere in the Sunni Triangle.

What they lack in originality they make up for in stupidity.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 03:16 PM | Link to this

Silly Sam,

For a newcomer to this blog you sure seem to know a lot about my political postions.

Tell me parvenu, which policies that I favor do you disagree with?

Or is the truth of the matter that you aren’t really new to this blog at all, and are just using a new blog “persona” while posing as a conservative.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 03:19 PM | Link to this

Marcus,

I forgot to mention, it was when PoFo was using the temporary ID of “by the balls”, so my comment to the punk made perfect sense in that context.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 03:19 PM | Link to this

I wonder why suddenly Mr. Bush has become conciliatory regarding domestic surveillance. This was not his stance prior to losing his bully pulpit. If it were so crucial then is it not now? Could it be that what he deemed legal and constitutional then is not so legal or constitutional in reality. And maybe he fears the ramifications of tight scrutiny into that issue. Makes one wonder.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 03:24 PM | Link to this

BD-

“What they lack in originality they make up for in stupidity.”

And that’s the beauty of the freedom of speech. Give ‘em a rope long enough…

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 03:32 PM | Link to this

Danish

Filthy treasonous lefty wankers such as our own silly sam have always coveted the demeanor and SUPERIOR standing of their conservative betters and subsequently have recently co-opted the glorious title.

It is truly our noble duty to valiantly protect the moniker from disingenuous marxist cretins like silly sam. silly sam’s erroneous and misleading labeling of himself as a conservative would have earned him a much DESERVED date with the London Tower for fraud and deceit during King Henry’s reign!!

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 03:41 PM | Link to this

Sam (Counterfeit Conservative)

Oh no you don’t. You need to answer my question before you slither away with a new topic:

Since you know so much about me, what is it about my positions that you disagree with? Out with it, poseur.

Here’s a hint to any one who’s watching this ridiculous farce:

Only counterfeit conservatives refer to tapping the conversations of Al Qaeda suspects that are made while they are on foreign soil as “domestic” wiretapping.

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 03:43 PM | Link to this

And of course if you are a bollockchopped curious peepingtom (gedditt??)) you prattle on and on and on inanely, snidely and enviously about folks who are intellectually and politically much smarter than you. [GOAD GOAD] But at least you always entertain your conservative betters with this typical lefty whining approach so don’t stop - keep your shiite coming peeping tom!!

See how easy it was this morning - just ONE POST with some astute observations about the anal obsessive dogturd id stealer and its off and rabidly slobbering again… this is just TOO FUNNY … a veritable Pavlov’s parrot/lemming mix that needs to be put down at a local vetinary.

I’m assuming curious peeping tom is merely lashing out at those who have a better lot in life than his role as a pink fluffy dice lovin’ Macon pimp … ooops … that was slightly personal - but merely mirrors back peepingtom’s own boorish vulgar highly personal outburst at TOTAL STRANGERS ON A POLITICS BLOG.

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 03:46 PM | Link to this

LISTEN UP YOU GUTLESS LITTLE TWERPS!!

Open arms?!!! I don’t want to kiss you, f@ggoty freak!! Markie, I’m going to drag your skinny little body out of your hovel and help you find some 11th hour redemption!!

It is too late to start crying for your mommy, you scared little punk!! Sgt, Badass is going to take care of everything!!

DANISH!! You are one dumb little split-tail!! This NCO doesn’t like it when s skanky draft dodger misspells his rank!!

Not only are you gutless, you are stupid!! Please, please tell the Sgt. that you have never procreated!

This country doesn’t need more gutless, lying scumbags!!

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 03:50 PM | Link to this

This is but my third post of the day - the id stealing wormy dogturd is gleefully responsible for the rest - although I will admit that I am quite p!ssed off that the anal obsessive wormy dogturd wasn’t a wee bit more abusive to curious peepingtom on my behalf.

Effortlessly and continuously MANIPULATING such a sad (r)unt as wormy dogturd is but a minor pleasure.

Now back to the tape delayed Addicks v Pompey footy game.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 03:51 PM | Link to this

And none of you have yet to tell any of us what tenets of republicanism or true conservatism you adhere to. I really don’t think you can. You are fringe lunatics that when backed into a corner react like the schoolyard bully instead of something substantive to refute another bloggers post. You are not true conservatives. You are ignorant morons that attached yourself to what once was a thinking right common sense party. Fortunately now you are neutered. 06 showed the party the neccessity to get way left of you. Your lunatic ravings and rantings from the fringe have alienated you and your ilk. You are not fit to call yourself republicans or conservatives.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 03:58 PM | Link to this

One:

It is too late to start crying for your mommy, you scared little punk!! Sgt, Badass (sic) is going to take care of everything!!

Two:

DANISH!! You are one dumb little split-tail!! This NCO doesn’t like it when s skanky draft dodger misspells his rank!!

Thanks for the info Badass. I’ll remember to put a comma after “Sgt” from now on.

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 04:04 PM | Link to this

Evidently the 3.50 post shows that our resident id stealing dogturd afterbirth refuses to remain in his decrepid hole. Goading pathetic invertebrate maggots like our id stealing nutter brings endless joy!

See how easy it is to wind up chav scum like anal stalker with two honest posts this afternoon!! Its quite pathetic really to hold such cretinous scum on such a short leash!!

By E-trade Eclairs

January 20, 2007 04:06 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish: acuna matata!

and Say hello to my little friend: <=3

By Sam

January 20, 2007 04:08 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish, you have yet to tell us how any of your views that are so well known on this blog jive with Goldwater conservatism. I voiced mine. Once again. Fiscal responsibility, small government, and staying the hell out of the private lives of the citizenry. Those are my conservative beliefs. Now tell us yours Danish. Tell us Buy Danish. T** for tat. Or are you just a loudmouthed shill for the darker side of humanity. What is conservative about you Danish? Can you even come up with one thing that puts you in touch with true conservatism? No you can’t. Because you have painted yourself into a corner with your fringe rantings on this blog, and now that true conservatives have voiced themselves at the ballot box or as you say stayed home to avoid casting a vote for the present psuedo conservative crowd, you have nothing to fight with any longer. You have been spayed Buy Danish. You are no conservative.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 04:11 PM | Link to this

And none of you have yet to tell any of us what tenets of republicanism or true conservatism you adhere to.

Sam (counterfeit conservative),

You implied that you knew all about my postions on the issues. Now you admit you don’t know diddley squat.

You’re busted.

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 04:16 PM | Link to this

DANISH, YOU FATASS!! I’ll slap the smirk off of that ugly face of yours!!

You and your worthless sissy boy-friends are not even Americans! You are traitors and deserve to join your pal Saddam. The Sgt. would love to assist.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 04:17 PM | Link to this

Silly Sam,

Have you ever heard of Ronald Reagan?

It’s so convenient of you Lefties to now claim that Goldwater really had it going on, after all.

Now please, quote one of my “fringe rantings” for all of us (if you can even differentiate between mine and the jackers).

Conservatives use facts and information, not innuendo to back up their points.

Let’s have ONE from you.

By TFTT'S glory hole

January 20, 2007 04:18 PM | Link to this

{SPLAT!!}———-<=3

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 04:23 PM | Link to this

Conservatives use right-wing blogs and talk show propaganda, not facts to back up their points.

Let’s have ONE from you.

By TFTT's glory hole

January 20, 2007 04:26 PM | Link to this

(o)—————<=3

By Midori

January 20, 2007 04:27 PM | Link to this

LOL, This blog is a hoot today.

I don’t even miss football.

Sam, you’re all right!!! :)

Food for thought. Mehlman echoes your sentiments

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 04:27 PM | Link to this

One sure sign that Sam’s a phony is that no conservative would label the surveillance program as domestic. It’s always liberals that lie about the program and label it that way.

By the way, Sam the phony. The FISA court caved in to the Bush program and gave it their blessing. Kind of a neat trick on the administration’s part getting to have their program and take away the ability for you uber libs to claim it’s illegal.

By Buy Danish

January 20, 2007 04:32 PM | Link to this

OOOOOOOOH.

Junior Sgt, badass is becoming more and more unglued. Using juvenile names now like “fatass” and claiming that I have “an ugly face”.

Doesn’t have a clue what I look like, but hey, that doesn’t stop these punk jackasses from making personal attacks (I don’t need a picture to know what a jackass looks like, junior. It’s the face of the Democrat Party.)

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 04:35 PM | Link to this

Another sure sign Sam’s a phony is when the parrot comes over to squawk his praises.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 20, 2007 04:37 PM | Link to this

Here we go. Now it’s nickjacking time! Oh goody! Is it time to get your diapers changed too? Don’t ask me to do it - that’s your mommy’s job.

Don’t look now but you also dropped your pacifier in the sand box and it’s all yucky now.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 04:40 PM | Link to this

“Open arms?!!! I don’t want to kiss you, f@ggoty freak!! Markie, I’m going to drag your skinny little body out of your hovel and help you find some 11th hour redemption!!”

Yeah, here’s one of my “open arms” that will be waiting for you at my doorstep.

In any event, thanks for exposing the sickness of liberalism and hypocrisy on using a homosexual epithet in an attempt to insult one of your Conservative betters.

Oh, and just for the record “Markie” commenting freak, you have been marked.

By troll

January 20, 2007 04:41 PM | Link to this

Danish is as ugly as she is retarded. Anybody can plainly see her blind allegiance to the GOP and the right-wing. We know she has no chance of getting laid since she spins an entire Saturday on a blog. My estimate is that her fatass will need a larger computer chair within the next 2 weeks after spending 24/7 online…

By getalife

January 20, 2007 04:44 PM | Link to this

Neat trick?

Yes RW,

They are playing many neat tricks on the American people.

Fact is, it was illegal and you are cheering on criminals.

Pathetic, as usual.

I bet you loved Nixon too.

By getalife

January 20, 2007 04:49 PM | Link to this

I see Markus is scared of the Sgt.

Hell, BD has bigger balls than macaca.

Geez, what a a wussy.

By Midori

January 20, 2007 04:50 PM | Link to this

yes, RW. I understand you are the ultimate authority on “squawking”. We are all very proud of you

Yes, I did praise Sam. He’s a much needed voice of clarity for you out-of-towners.

p.s. — it is not “conservatives” who label the unlawful eavesdropping program as “domestic”.

It’s the rest of the country who have left you Kool Aide Kids by the wayside.

I didn’t come here to fight with you, nor to call names.

But I’m not about to let a low life POS like you continue to call me names and not respond.

Go sit over in the corner and molt quietly, dear. That should give you ample opportunity to think of some more meaningless and equally asinine catch phrases.

By Sam

January 20, 2007 04:50 PM | Link to this

Then use some facts Buy Danish! You have come back with nothing but rhetoric. Tell us what your conservative beliefs are. I gave you 3 of mine and all you do is throw out Ronald Reagans name without saying one word about conservative beliefs or viewpoints. Why? Because you advocate big government, runaway deficits, and government intrusion into the lives of our citizenry. And you do that through your blind lemming like devotion to GW. You are dumb Buy Danish. When it is time to put it up you can’t. And obviously Buy Danish, you spend so much time on this blog that you obviously are not aware of GWs 180 on domestic surveillance. And it was not the FISA court that caved it was Alberto Gonzalez interpreting the law the way GW wanted him to. Now GW has flip flopped. He knows that Gonzalez’s interpretation will not stand up if challenged bu the new congress. And why pray tell Danish are republicans in the congress and senate running away from your brand of conservatism and GW as fast as they can?

By Midori

January 20, 2007 04:51 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

he is pathetic, isn’t he?

By Markus

January 20, 2007 04:52 PM | Link to this

“We know she (Buy Danish) has no chance of getting laid since she spins an entire Saturday on a blog.”

So what’s YOUR excuse, you pathetic liberal neoStalinist multiple ID freak?

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 04:53 PM | Link to this

getalife,

The FACT is the court said it was legal, deal with it.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 20, 2007 04:58 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I think that Marcus was making a play on the word “arms” by the junior hall monitor.

Troll,

As I remarked earlier about one of your sandbox playmates, what you toddlers lack in originality you make up for in stupidity.

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 05:00 PM | Link to this

DANISH! YOU DISGUSTING PIG!!

You are a maggot!! There are no attractive or skinny maggots!! There are no intelligent or useful maggots!!

The Sgt. could give a flying fvck about your worthless opinions or your ample asscheeks!! Seeing the look on your hideous face with my boot up your backside is all the Sgt. cares about!!

By Midori

January 20, 2007 05:01 PM | Link to this

RW,

Instead of hurling insults, you could learn a lot from Sam.

Google can be your friend as well.

I’m off to dinner.

Later.

P.S. - Think you can pick your feathers up on your way out the door?

By getalife

January 20, 2007 05:01 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Yep, they all squawk the same crap.

Watching the gop debate on C- Span and they do the same.

One brained parrots.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 05:03 PM | Link to this

Man, that global warming is sure a b!tch this time of year. Oh wait, like the pseudo-expert Al Sores said 30 years ago, maybe global warming causes global cooling as well.. or more recently during that neoMarxist liberal propoganda POS flick “The Day After Tomorrow.”

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070119/D8MOB66G3.html

The only time the global warming Jim Jones Kool-Aide drinking liberals and their lapdog RAT terrier media ever really get riled up over global warming is during summer.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 20, 2007 05:04 PM | Link to this

Sorry Sam,

When you learn to find some paragraph breaks to insert in your manifesto I might bother to read it.

I did see something in there again that indicated that you are familiar with my blogging habits.

Who are you when you’re not “Sam”?

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 05:06 PM | Link to this

MARKIE, YOU PU$$Y IMBECILE!!

Shut your yammering yellow yap!!

Pieces of worthless dung like you are to speak only when spoken to!! The Sgt. doesn’t want to see any more of your nazi lingo!!

Traitors get what is coming to them, if you catch my drift, you spineless little tw@t!!

By Markus

January 20, 2007 05:12 PM | Link to this

“Fact is, it was illegal and you are cheering on criminals.”

Liberals say this while out of the other sides of their filthy RAT sewers they are the first to say that everyone in jail from murderers to child rapists should be released into a rehabilitation program because being in jail is cruel.

Their hero Dukakis said that years ago with one action.

http://www.politicalgateway.com/main/columns/read.html?col=176

No credibility. No respect.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 05:15 PM | Link to this

“Traitors get what is coming to them, if you catch my drift, you spineless little tw@t!!”

I’ll be waiting with open arms, my liberal neoMarxist sweetheart.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 20, 2007 05:20 PM | Link to this

Midori,

If you think that Sam’s posts are free of insults, then you have a worse case of parrot disease than even I thought possible.

Sam,

Here’s how you can prove your conservative creds:

You mentioned deficits. What’s your “conservative” proposal to end them.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 20, 2007 05:27 PM | Link to this

Sam,

I have to go. I’ll read your deficit ending solution later on tonight.

By RW-(the original)

January 20, 2007 05:31 PM | Link to this

Well since I never mentioned Midori, I guess we know for sure who the parrot is.

Sam,

Tell us one part of the Bush surveillance program that was changed. I’ll give you a hint, you can’t. Try reading past the headline someday.

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 05:35 PM | Link to this

SPARKIE, YOU DEPRAVED PUKE BUCKET!!

Are you French?!! You talk like one of those chickensh!ts, you gutless fvcknut!! Just how many boys have you buggered, you godless commie sodomite?

I’ll rip your ugly worthless head off and crap down your neck, you traitorous freak!!

By WootenDull

January 20, 2007 05:36 PM | Link to this

By Sgt. Badass January 20, 2007 02:46 PM LISTEN UP SLIMEBALLS!!! You whiney sickening neo-cons, like Markus, Buy Danish and WootenDull, are like cockroaches!!

Well it’s good to see that Sgt. PunkAs-s has balls enough to take someone on, considering that he doesn’t have the courage to fight Islamic Fascism.

“But we will hold the president accountable,” she said. “He has to answer for his war. He has dug a hole so deep he can’t even see the light on this … It’s a historic blunder.”

It’s not enough for these Sheila democrats to STFU and let the men fight the war, they have to wet their panties, get all hysterical, in front of our enemies.

Cowards.

But they’ll always be ready to “fight” other Americans, gosh, what bravery.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By time for the truth

January 20, 2007 05:37 PM | Link to this

so the filthy child abuser redneKKKs NAMBLA returns from the child molestors paradise of VT as Sgt QueerBathouse. What other sick thing that slithers on here like this is ever this anally obsessed with its political/intellectual betters??

You’re a sad dweebish feckpig NAMBLA … “hope you die before I get old” - (with suitable apologies to The Who).

Who says wittily verbally abusing lefties aint fun!!

By E-trade Eclairs

January 20, 2007 05:41 PM | Link to this

Say hello to little friend.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 05:53 PM | Link to this

“Cowards. But they’ll always be ready to “fight” other Americans, gosh, what bravery.”

Lucko nails it. They have more hatred for their political and ideological opposition in THIS nation than they do for those islamoterrorists that want to KILL US ALL.

Little do these assbandit liberals realize that they would be the FIRST to get their heads sawed off by said terrorists… all based solely on their stances on social issues. Idiots.

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 05:56 PM | Link to this

WOOTENDULL, YOU PATHETIC JOKE!!

You and Monsieur Markie are useless fvcksticks!! You are NOT Americans!!

The Sgt. has killed enough nazis and dinks to recognize them and you boys, have the unmistakeable stench of jew killing fascist pigs!!

There will NEVER be a place for you non-contributing cum buckets to hide in this country and it is my job to make you walking latrines feel the sweet sabre of liberty across your treasonous throats.

And I love my job!!!

By Sgt. Badass

January 20, 2007 06:04 PM | Link to this

MONSIEUR MARKIE!!

So a french fvckup illegal immigrant like yourself thinks because he has mooched off of the protection of those who have provided his security and liberty for some time he is an American?!!

You are one giant liberal cesspool and a coward who deserves a one way ticket to Paris. Or Baghdad.

By WootenDull

January 20, 2007 06:07 PM | Link to this

While the timing of the news was a closely guarded secret, the announcement itself is not all together surprising. The junior senator from New York has been considering a presidential run for months. During a televised debate just before her re-election to the Senate last November, Klinton told voters they should not count on her completing a full six-year Senate term.

Where’s Billy?

We’re not embarrassed of him, are we?

Or is he laid up with some hoser this weekend<—————————-!!!!!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Markus

January 20, 2007 06:08 PM | Link to this

“The Sgt. has killed enough nazis and dinks to recognize them and you boys, have the unmistakeable stench of jew killing fascist pigs!! There will NEVER be a place for you non-contributing cum buckets to hide in this country and it is my job to make you walking latrines feel the sweet sabre of liberty across your treasonous throats. And I love my job!!!”

It’s nice to see a liberal speak it’s true mind here. Give them a rope long enough…

By E-trade Eclairs

January 20, 2007 07:10 PM | Link to this

Say hello to my little friend!

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 08:03 AM | Link to this

SPOTLIGHT ON: JORDAN: Public sentiment turns against U.S Bush’s policy, war in Iraq are sources of anger

A photo under this headline, which you have to buy the Urinal to see, shows a group of males mugging for the camera with the angle of the picture shot to make appear that there are more of them, there are no woman shown because Islam doesn’t allow them to voice their opinions and there is an effigy of Uncle Sam being burnt, a dummy with an American flag that is inscribed with the words “Defend Freedom.”

We can’t have that “Freedom,” now can we?

And guess who’s fault all of this is?

Cut to Madame Dullard’s column:

“Therein lies our profound difficulty. There is absolutely no chance for “victory” or “success” in Iraq at this late date, little chance in even averting disaster. What is done cannot be undone. There is no way forward.” (I guess it still nighty-night for the perverts at the AJC, as of 7:34 they still haven’t posted the Sunday online edition. I have no link.)

The AJC has posted a picture (see above) that shows that the Middle East is already a “disaster,” regardless of the conditions in Iraq, but the libs could care less, they don’t give a rat’s as-s that Jordan is an oppressive society where women have no say in the government’s affairs, because that would blow their chance to blame it all on America.

Blaming America is all these guilt tripping cowards care about doing,

These pinko liberals are too stupid to realize that their blatant bald faced Anti American whining, their fabricated stories and their fake pictures, only serve to illustrate how wrong they are and how courageous George W Bush is for trying to bring freedom and liberty to the Middle East.

And how spineless liberalism is for wishing that he fails.

“There is absolutely no chance for “victory” or “success” in Iraq at this late date, little chance in even averting disaster.”

I know Madame Dullard put scare quotes around the words victory and success because she knows that the United States won’t fail; this leaves her an excuse next year to whine and harp that all those free self governing Iraqis are really just slaves to American imperalism, or some such bullsh!t, that it may appear to be a “victory” but it really isn’t.

It’s the small things that tell you what a liberal really means and Cynthia has told us that she wishes America would fail because Bush sucks.

In so many words.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Phil Dolan

January 21, 2007 08:24 AM | Link to this

“ZZZZZZ”

That’s not what your wife said last nite….!

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 08:25 AM | Link to this

BELGRADE, Serbia — The United States has moved troops to northern Kosovo to protect the Serbian minority ahead of elections today in Serbia, where nationalists have pledged to prevent the province’s ethnic-Albanian majority from obtaining independence.

Huh, “Clinton’s” civil war drags on and on.

I guess Bubba didn’t have a “plan.”

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 08:32 AM | Link to this

By Phil Dolan January 21, 2007 08:24 AM “ZZZZZZ” That’s not what your wife said last nite….!

Look at this peeping tom, looking in my windows.

Freak.

I was good though.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 08:34 AM | Link to this

The Democrats also bear plenty of responsibility… for politicizing a foreign policy debate that should have stopped at our shoreline. Their well-intended but unrestrained, emotional, often hyperbolic effort to prove the president wrong on Iraq will help defeat us as surely as a setback on the battlefield. Soon we may see a vote in Congress that says, “We can’t stop the surge plan, but we don’t support it.” All such statements demoralize the troops, devalue their sacrifices, and embolden the enemy to kill them. This will surely have a lifelong effect on our Iraqi war veterans. The authors have not forgotten the pain Americans inflicted on Vietnam era veterans by blaming them for the war itself. Make no mistake — like our Vietnam war veterans, our Iraq war veterans will never forget the lack of commitment to prevail should we lose this war.

By Phil Dolan

January 21, 2007 08:58 AM | Link to this

Getting back on topic, and also back into the realm of planet earth, (twilight zone theme music here for dullardboy), we might not ever throw a wake for mink coats, but we do owe a eulogy for all those millions of racoons (coonskin caps) inspired by Disney’s Davey Crocket tv series in the 1950’s.

Millions of baby boomers wore the tails of racoons. My family was poor, and we couldn’t buy one, but I was lucky. I lived in Texas. Roadkill was always fresh, and I had a small cottage industry selling racoon tails from a roadside stand to passersby who wanted to make their own coonskin caps.

But I never felt sorry for, or mourned the poor racoons. I regret my actions.

As for Iraqis, let them find their own racoons.

By Phil Dolan

January 21, 2007 09:07 AM | Link to this

Dullardboy, you are special. You read something, and expect us to regard it as a relevant article, when it’s always rush-flush, or hannity-insanity. You’re misinformed, and ruined by partisan doublespeak. (Example? Our general who got the urge to surge in iraq four years ago was treated worse than Benedict Arnold, yet now Bush is supposed to be some military master-mind because he’s got the mini-urge to mini-surge. Your about face on troop strenght makes you look like pee wee herman trying to take it all in at a goat porn convention)

I’ll tell you what, the day you ever think out one issue on your own, and blog one original insight, then that’s the day we’ll respect you.

Fair enough?

By Phil Dolan

January 21, 2007 09:32 AM | Link to this

Watch Meet the Press at 10AM. Watch “This Week” at 11AM.

Then we blog our insights till the playoffs.

This will inform the lurkers about your intellect, sir. You wont dare expose it, I know, but I thought I’d lay down the challenge anyway.

We’ll see who comprehends round table issues and debate.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 09:33 AM | Link to this

By Phil Dolan January 21, 2007 09:07 AM I’ll tell you what, the day you ever think out one issue on your own, and blog one original insight, then that’s the day we’ll respect you. Fair enough?

Polly: You believe your ideas are “original” because no one else agrees with you. Well, actually, no one even understands you but that’s a subject for another day.

People telling you to STFU does not make you a deep thinker or a “pioneer.” They honestly just don’t want to hear your sh!t anymore.

As for me, I constantly find other people that totally agree with my opinions and post their words as proof of my beliefs. I can even find democrats that agree with me, and most of the dissenting opinions I show them to be anti American petty partisan bullsh!t.

And you know I’m right. Nothing I’ve ever said has changed, not a damn lick since 9/11/01, kill the terrorists, bring freedom to the Middle East, America wins.

You libs, on the other hand, have flopped around like fish, whatever Bush decides you will be opposite of that, sided up with Al Qaeda in most cases. If you see strength in this position, if you can live with wishing defeat for your own country, then go for it, it’s a free country.

But don’t act like a hurt little bit-ch when you get called on it. You’re still a piece of crap scumbag.

You made the choice, deal with it.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 09:41 AM | Link to this

For instance:

“Do you personally want the Iraq plan President Bush announced last week to succeed?” And here’s how the American people answered: 63 percent said yes, 22 percent said no, 15 percent said they didn’t know. Let me see if I understand that. For four years, regardless of this or that position on the merits of the war, almost everybody has claimed to “support our troops.” Some of us have always thought that ”supporting the troops” while not supporting them in their mission is not entirely credible. But here we have 37 percent of the American people actually urging defeat on them. They ”support our troops” by wanting them to lose. This isn’t a question about whether you think the plan will work, but whether you want it to work. And nearly 40 percent of respondents either don’t know or are actively rooting for failure.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 09:58 AM | Link to this

You just have to admire the irony:

By Polly January 21, 2007 09:07 AM You’re misinformed, and ruined by partisan doublespeak.

By Polly January 21, 2007 09:32 AM Watch Meet the Press at 10AM.

Meet the Depressed, eh?

Does it, or matter of fact, can it get any more partisan then that?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By ron miller

January 21, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

* Just Heard on CNN News*

In a related story, Ron Mexico (aka. Mike Vick) has just announced who will defend him for his upcoming drug trial slated for later this month in Miami. It a shocking chain of events, Johnny Cochran is being dug up and airlifted in what is being called “Dream Team II”. Assisting Johnny on this high profile case will be other well known reverse recist Jesse Jackson, Cynthia McKinney, Rev Al Sharpton, F. Lee Bailey, Spike Lee and OJ.

The Cochran Law firm has indicated that Johnny will plan to “Pull Out The Race Card” on the first day of court and clearly show that as a black athlete Ron and most corrupt black athletes who emulate “Gangsters” and “Gang Bangers” are not required to follow the same laws as the rest of society. Johnny will show that Ron had a rough life and cannot be responsible for infecting innocent women with herpes, allowing his friends to carry/use drugs in a car registered to him, have multiply children out of wedlock, partying at hip-hop clubs all hours of the night during the NFL season, giving the fans the finger, dressing representing the NFL & the Falcons as a gangster rap star in the public eye, running with posse members who have criminal records, and always having to bail Marcus out of jail.

As a “role model” to kids. Ron is Superman, not Superfly!!. Its ok to tell kids drugs are good, breaking the laws & rules of society are fun, and it’s “Cool” and “Hip” to dress up and act like Gang Bangers, Graffiti Artist, Rappers and Thugs (those who spill blood & spread violence in our neighborhood.

“If the thug image don’t fit, than you must acquit”

In a surprising move Johnny will introduce to the stand the following “Character Witnesses” to show that Ron has high morals, character, and represents his team and the NFL as a total professional on and off the field. He will show that Ron has the up most respect for the game and to all those who preceded him.

This list of well known and respected citizens will include, but not limited to: Josh Smith, Terrell Owens, Dennis Rodman, Randy Moss, Charles Barkley, Ron Artest, Whiney Houston, Bobby Brown, Ray Lewis Flavor of Love, Carmelo Anthony, Eminem, Queen Latifah, Kanye West, Darryl Strawberry, Snoop Dogg, Ice T, Allen Iverson, Michael Irvin, Ricky Williams, Tim Robbins, members of the Ziggy Marley band, P-Funk, Terrance Moore, Barry Bonds, Cheech and Chong, Ted Kennedy, Vanialla Ice and a special appearance by Marcus Vick (wearing ankle braclets).

Videos of Tupac Skakur, Mizelli and Notorious BIG will be shown during opening and closing statements for the defense.

In another developing story, CNN has reported that the Miami-Dade County DA office is compiling a list of “Character Witnesses” themselves that will show no matter what the color of your skin is, A Person must be held responsible for their actions in society and how one chooses to represent themselves to the public eye.

This list includes but is not limited to: Tiger Woods, Bill Lester, Hank Aaron, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Terry Holt, Marvin Harrison, UN President Annan, Dee Dee Bridgewater, Oprah, Warren Dunn, Senator Obama, Doug Williams, Bill Cosby, Steve McNair, Donovon McNabb, Carl Lewis, Mike Singletary, Deacon Jones, Sylvester Crooms, Lovie Smith, Michael Jordan, Denzall Washington, Lynn Swann, Jerry Rice, Serena Williams, Tony Dungy, Mark Jackson, Desmond Howard, Isaiah Thomas, Grant Hill, Derrick Jeter, Edwin Moses, Bo Jackson, Barry Sanders, Reggie Miller, Oscar Roberson, Ali and Jackie Joyner-Kersee.

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

By Wooten Dull @9:41 a.m., tries to make the tired and failed conservative right-wing arguement that anyone who does not support Bush is not supporting the troops. This limited viewpoint is now, as it was the first time it was ever made, a lame, pitiful way to look at our current mess in Iraq and of supporting our troops.

Bush is one person. He is not now, nor has he ever been, nor will he ever be, a member of the troops.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

“I’ll tell you what, the day you ever think out one issue on your own, and blog one original insight, then that’s the day we’ll respect you.”

That’s freaking hillarious. This, from one of the many oh-so-openminded liberal who only posts links from the New York Slimes and left-wing kook sites. This, from mindless idiots who love Chris “Softballs” Matthews and don’t think he’s biased left. This, from sheepleton liberals who think George Steponanoctopus is not biased left. This, from a group of neoStalinist wallet thiefs who think that just because someone doesn’t believe that MANKIND is causing global warming then that person just doesn’t believe in global warming PERIOD. And to think these labotomized lemmings on the left say WE can’t think for ourselves. Pathetic.

“We have confirmed at least one individual has made domestic terrrorist threats.”

Yep, like I said, give them a rope long enough…

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

Ron Miller,

You lost me with part 2 when you introduced Kofi Annan and others as “character witnesses”.

WootenDull,

Thanks for the Steyn of coffee. Between the poll results and this, I am wide awake:

The madrassah stuff was supposedly leaked to Insight Magazine by some oppo-research heavies on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s team. Which if true suggests that Hillary’s losing her touch. It’s certainly the case that a foreign education doesn’t always assist in electoral politics: John Kerry didn’t play up the Swiss finishing school angle. But look at it from a Democratic primary voter’s point of view, the kind who drives around with those ”CO-EXIST” bumper stickers made up of the cross and the Star of David and the Islamic crescent and the peace sign. Your whole world view is based on the belief that deep down we’d all rub along just fine and this neocon fever about Islam is just a lot of banana oil to keep the American people in a state of fear and paranoia. What would more resoundingly confirm that view than if the nicest, most non-bitter, nonpartisan guy in politics turns out to have graduated from the Sword of the Infidel Slayer grade school in Jakarta?

By Markus

January 21, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this

“I look at ‘24’ as being like a 527 [tax-exempt groups that engage in political activity]. It’s bringing up that issue about terrorism, it certainly serves the Bush administration.”

The disease of liberalism exposed itself last night on Fox News Watch. A flaming liberal (Neal Gabler) says that the show 24 is basically a plug for the Bush administration. WTF? What the hell do they think that failed show about a woman president was about? Or constant Republican-bashing on Law & Order? Or that idiotic Al Sore-type movie the Day After Tomorrow? Fascist moonbats.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

Poor old Al Sore just can’t help himself. A Danish skeptic challenged the Sore to an interview on global warming. The Sore chickened out at the last minute. Gee, I wonder why? You would think that Mr. Smokestack/Hurricane DVD Front Cover Sore would have the chutzpas to back up what he so believes in. I mean, let’s get real here. Global warming IS a religion to so many liberals (since they don’t have a real one).

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009552

Poor old Sore, he just can’t get a break.

By time for the truth

January 21, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this

This is just unbelievable … and shows just how deliberately pathetic and twisted mohammedan fascists and religious nutters are. The equally pathetic thing is that this leftist police chief actually allowed this to occur.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?inarticleid=430249&inpageid=1770&inpageid=1770&expand=true#StartComments

By getalife

January 21, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this

Championship Sunday.

The Saints are one win away from the big one.

Geaux Saints!

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

Marcus,

I have dubbed Al Gore the Grand Ayatollah of Global Warming.

Regarding Neal Gabler - Don’t forget the good news, which is that he isn’t asking that 24 be censored.

What a guy!

By Markus

January 21, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

BD-

“Regarding Neal Gabler - Don’t forget the good news, which is that he isn’t asking that 24 be censored.”

Good point. In an event, C.A.I.R has already protested the show, so they are pushing the envelope of non-political correctness… that pathetic liberal backbone-melting fascist indoctrination policy that says we can’t offend anyone or any group.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this

More sickness of liberalism. Last fall a speech on The Minutemen at Columbia U was interrupted and the stage swarmed in protests by those oh-so-tolerant liberals and those psuedo-know-it-all students. One sign the protesters had said: “There are no illegals.” Trash.

http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/05/video-columbia-amnesty-fascists-rush-stage-at-minuteman-speech/

Michelle Malkin writes about it here:

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006053.htm

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Marcus,

C.A.I.R. which is itself an offshoot of an Islamist terrorist group is protesting that Islamists are portrayed as terrorists on 24.

Tant pis.

By Mrs. RepubLady

January 21, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

All I know is the Iraqis owe us a HUGE debt of gratitude.

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

The question was Do you want the Iraq plan to succeed

22% said NO

15% said they don’t know

Yet Dennis, the school teacher, says those people are supporting the troops. I won’t go so far as to add the 15% into the number since they may be too ignorant to come in out of the rain, but 22% of those surveyed said they want the plan to fail!

Explain how that is support, Dahreese?

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

RW(the original) says and asks, “but 22% of those surveyed said they want the plan to fail!

“Explain how that is support, Dahreese?”

The difference is in how you ask the question(s). To want Bush (the plan)to fail is one viewpoint, to want the troops to fail is another, and the two are not synonymous as you and others want it to be.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Mrs. RepubLady

January 21, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

Well, I am willing to commit our troops for 30 more years, because I love this country. Besides, they have important stuff to do there.

“Crucially, the proposed Iraqi hydrocarbon law, currently circulating as a 33-page draft, would give exploration and development rights to foreign oil companies such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP and Shell—possibly for up to 30 years. And in the early stages of such exploitation (in every sense of the word), these companies would, under the proposed law, be allowed to take up to 75 percent of resulting oil profits, until they decide that their infrastructure investments have been repaid. Even afterwards, these companies could still take oil profits as high as 20 percent from Iraqi revenues. All of which casts such memorable Bush Bunch claims as “We did not do it [i.e., invade Iraq] for oil” (Colin Powell, July 10, 2003) in an ironic new light.”

Profits make me happy.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this

By Dennis January 21, 2007 10:15 AM By Wooten Dull @9:41 a.m., tries to make the tired and failed conservative right-wing arguement that anyone who does not support Bush is not supporting the troops.

Only a true dullard can’t separate their mindless drooling hatred of George W Bush from the fact the he is the Commander In Chief of our Armed Forces and rooting against his plan is rooting against the troops, plain and simple.

It’s a basic comprehension issue we’re dealing with here, liberals just don’t get it.

In a sane, lucid world one would not have to explain that it is not normal to root against the very country that you live in.

It’s proof positive that you can’t take even the most obvious things for granted, you cannot assume anything, that once the human mind starts down the road to perversion that soon enough there will be no limits to their depravity.

It’s not like these surrender monkey deviants have anything better to offer, it’s just obstruction, criticism and treasonous back stabbing for them, taking the easy way out all the while sniping at the real men who protect the very freedoms that they abuse every day.

When are we going to get tired of their sh!t?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this

Hillary with Chris Mathews. An interview so rushed they had to do it on SNL

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

By Mrs. RepubLady January 21, 2007 12:25 PM Well, I am willing to commit our troops for 30 more years, because I love this country. Besides, they have important stuff to do there. Profits make me happy.

Are we talking blood money here, the blood of American soldiers shed for those profits makes you…?

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this

Dennis,

You can spin it any way you want, but you can’t change the fact that the question was “Do you want the plan to succeed.” and 22% said NO.

By Phil Dolan

January 21, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Our own Cynthia Tucker was on Chris Mathews this morning. What a babe, and she stole the show, made the most incisive remarks and got alot of laughs too. Lovin’ Cynthia Tucker!

Sen Brownback (R-Kan),was on “this Morning”, and he thinks Iraq should be three independent states. He also said that we need “more, bigger, stronger families, well, not bigger, but more big…er…stronger families,”. (oh, he’s a great candidate). Then Brownback went and recited the same data that Wooten Blogged about in Sunday’s AJC, about single parent families, which makes me suspect that the Repudlickan Party issues talking point memos to the dittohead media parrots. (basically they order that the Wootens out there can talk about anything but Iraq).

But the main event this morning was McCain vs Kennedy. McCain speaks only to predictions about hypothetical consequences of redeploying and politically compromising in Iraq. All of his predictions about Iraq for the last four years were 100% wrong, yet he will only offer more predictions about options available to the US now. He will not answer any questions about the reality on the ground or the wisdom of the surge, (Lets wait and see).

Kennedy wants to put the main US effort in training Iraqis to defend the self-sustaining democratically-elected government and turn Iraq over to Iraqis.

Insight: The Feb. 06 bombing of the mosque in samara was Iraq’s World Trade Center (911), and it will take a year and a half for them to implement the military response to avenge that terrorist act. Global war on terror? No, it’s Iraqi’s war on terror between themselves. We took 18 months to invade Iraq for 911. Iraqis will take the same amount of time to invade each other to get even for Samara. Surge or no surge, Iraqis are in a post-911 stupor just like we were when we were led to war by an obviously impaired and stupified president, (and idiot).

word

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

Wooten Dull states; Only a true dullard can’t separate their mindless drooling hatred of George W Bush from the fact the he is the Commander In Chief of our Armed Forces and rooting against his plan is rooting against the troops, plain and simple.

Since you want to focus on the “authority” of the “Commander In Chief”, if the next “Commander In Chief” says we’re getting out of Iraq in 30 days after my tenure begins”, are you going to support that simply because it was stated by your “Commander In Chief”?

Who is it you are supporting, the “Commander In Chief” or GWB?

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By getalife

January 21, 2007 12:53 PM | Link to this

Google the Iraq oil contracts to see the fraud and theft in Iraq.

The one to warch is this one:

On January 23, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations will hold a hearing to investigate “oil and reconstruction strategy in Iraq.” This offers a critical opportunity to demand a cessation of all U.S. government and corporate influence over Iraqis as to the future of their oil.

By Mrs. RepubLady

January 21, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

WootenDull says almost verbatim the same thing I said in 1999:

“Only a true dullard can’t separate their mindless drooling hatred of Bill Clinton from the fact the he is the Commander In Chief of our Armed Forces and rooting against his plan is rooting against the troops, plain and simple.”

Even though I am a life-long Republican, true white Christian hater of all things lefty, liberal and anti-American, I did acknowledge Bill Clinton as the Commander in Chief and I supported the troops by supporting him. Okay, I hated him, and his uppity wife too, but when he looked at me, I knew he appreciated me for the red-blooded woman that I am, and when he kissed my mouth, I felt the earth move, and when he laid with me, I felt his heart so close to mine, and I knew our joy would fill the earth, and last till the end of time.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

Mrs. Repugnant Lady,

You forgot to highlight part of your idiotic post, like this:

These companies would, under the proposed law, be allowed to take up to 75 percent of resulting oil profits, until they decide that their infrastructure investments have been repaid.

The last time I checked these oil companies weren’t charities, and the Iraqis will eventually get to keep 80% of the profits.

RW,

Dahreese has his Useful Idiot doublespeak down perfectly with his convoluted excuses.

It’s kind of like saying you SUPPORT THE FOOTBALL TEAM but hope they are defeated because you don’t like the team’s coach and hate the city that they represent.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

“once the human mind starts down the road to perversion that soon enough there will be no limits to their depravity.”

Well said WD. Here’s a killer bumper sticker and Teddy Roosevelt quote that says that also. Sick, twisted liberals.

By Mrs. RepubLady

January 21, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

…Even so, George W. Bush is a MUCH better President than Bill Clinton, because with Bush, I can keep more of my money, and I don’t even have to work at all, because my oil and defense company investments are paying off so well. The tax cuts I get are just gravy. Why are people complaing about the troops being under-equipped? Let their mothers buy them body armor. Heck, you know they’d just waste that money on drugs anyway. This is working out well for them.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 01:01 PM | Link to this

“Our own Cynthia Tucker was on Chris Mathews this morning. What a babe,”

BFD. As if anyone who’s not a liberal demoncat on this blog could give a RAT’S A*. And that goes for Chris “softballs” Matthews as well.

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 01:07 PM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) January 21, 2007 12:47 PM | Dennis, You can spin it any way you want, but you can’t change the fact that the question was “Do you want the plan to succeed.” and 22% said NO.

As you put it, “spin” is the operative word.

In a recent cartoon a pollster asks a listener about Bush; “Which statement do you agree with more; (1) His second term’s a resounding success, (2)He’s the best president ever or (3) He’s doing better than you expected.”

The responder says, “I disagree with them all!” To which the pollster says, “If you HAD to choose?”; to which the responder replys, “Number 3.”

The pollster then reports, “The president’s apporval rating soars to 99%. Even hard-core democrats polled agree that Bush is doing better than expected.”

So, it all depends on how the question is rigged.

Bush is the plan. Just ask him. The troops are not.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 01:08 PM | Link to this

By Dennis January 21, 2007 12:50 PM Since you want to focus on the “authority” of the “Commander In Chief”, if the next “Commander In Chief” says we’re getting out of Iraq in 30 days after my tenure begins”, are you going to support that simply because it was stated by your “Commander In Chief”?

Dullard: Yes.

And don’t come back at me with Tom Delay, junior. One man does not equal a non binding resolution, haha.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 01:10 PM | Link to this

“It’s kind of like saying you SUPPORT THE FOOTBALL TEAM but hope they are defeated because you don’t like the team’s coach and hate the city that they represent.”

BD wins the Best Analogy Post of the year so far. Brilliantly put. Ultimately though, you can’t really debate these sick twisted liberals because their ideology is drawn from emotions and feelings, not beliefs and virtues.

Here’s how a typical “debate” goes between a Conservative and a libStalinist on global warming:

Lib: “You don’t believe in global warming.”

Con: “I do believe in global warming, I just don’t believe that mankind is causing it on the whole.”

Lib: “Like I said, you don’t believe in global warming.”

Con: “What part of I do believe the earth is warming and cooling as it’s always done, yet I don’t believe that mankind has much if anything to do with it do you not understand?”

Lib: “Like I said, you don’t believe in global warming.”

And these jackasses call us parrots who can’t think and reason.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 01:13 PM | Link to this

Republican ID fraud alert @12:58! Here we go again, The resident multiple ID liberal freakshow is at the retread machine again trying to make Conservatives look bad. Sick liberals.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 01:21 PM | Link to this

“Besides, they have important stuff to do there [Iraq]. Profits make me happy. Are we talking blood money here, the blood of American soldiers shed for those profits makes you…?”

Here we go again. Liberal ignoranuses wetting their pretty pink panties over profits. Profits from wars in this nation have happened since at least 1776. North American Aviation had to come up with the money somewhere to pay Rosie The Riviter to build those P-51s. Contractors had to get the money to pay for Europe’s rebuilding after WWII and US military base expansions there. That’s blood money? Sickos. Once again the disease and sheer blind ignorance of liberalism rears it’s ugly head. Fortunately, it’s an all too common occurence here for our amusement.

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 01:22 PM | Link to this

Well at least we have Dennis the dumbass on record about poll rigging, even though this one wasn’t.

Dahreese,

The choices were:

YES

NO

Don’t know

Those don’t exactly lend themselves to your silly cartoon argument, now do they?

By Serious Lee

January 21, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

Markus you little chickenhawk, its not like a football game at all you idiot. 19 football players didn’t die in a football game yesterday.

If Iraq is a game why don’t you go over there and play you big sissy.

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

Dullard: Yes. And don’t come back at me with Tom Delay, junior. One man does not equal a non binding resolution, haha.

Tom Delay and his free ingress/egress to the Oval Office is another subject. (But not an unimportant one).

The question(s) here is/are the wisdom (rather lack thereof) of GWB; but more importantly the “ethics” of following, willingly or blindly, a policy of willful taking and destruction of the lives and property of another. And ethically it doesn’t matter if the leader is your “Commander In Chief”, GWB, or your local bully.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 01:26 PM | Link to this

Dennis “Blah Blah” Dahreese,

I’m getting the sense that you are a congenital liar. Afterall, it takes years of practice to be able to spin a very simple statement into the Orwellian novel that you are writing (working title: The Dog Ate my Homework).

Not that anyone will buy your mind-numbingly boring and nonsensical book, but you get an “A” for effort.

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 01:47 PM | Link to this

Quoting RW(the original) above, “You can spin it any way you want, but you can’t change the fact that the question was “Do you want the plan to succeed.” and 22% said NO. The choices were: YES, NO, Don’t know.”

Those don’t exactly lend themselves to your silly cartoon argument, now do they?

On the contrary, it fits right in with your accusation that if someone doesn’t support Bush/the plan (one and the same) then they don’t support troops.

These are two totally different issues just as the idiotic statement above of wanting the football team to lose because you don’t like the coach.

The coach and the team, just like Bush and the troops are two totally different issues.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 01:50 PM | Link to this

By Dennis January 21, 2007 01:24 PM The question(s) here is/are the wisdom (rather lack thereof) of GWB; but more importantly the “ethics” of following, willingly or blindly, a policy of willful taking and destruction of the lives and property of another. And ethically it doesn’t matter if the leader is your “Commander In Chief”, GWB, or your local bully.

Dullard: I have no idea what you just said nor am I going to delve into the George Bush insanity and paranoia syndrome to try and figure it out.

You liberals have got some major mental issues to have one man cause so much slobbering deranged madness.

I, unencumbered from aforementioned delusions, can fully comprehend what it would be like to live as a dhimmi under Islamic Sharia law.

And it ain’t gonna happen.

Even if Hillary were president (aaack, gasp, cough) I would give my full backing to the national security of the country I live in.

I am not insane like you are.

This is not that hard to figure out, remember what New York used to look like?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 01:51 PM | Link to this

“Markus you little chickenhawk, its not like a football game at all you idiot. 19 football players didn’t die in a football game yesterday. If Iraq is a game why don’t you go over there and play you big sissy.”

How many IDs does this neoStalinist liberal jackass have anyway?

You stupid sick pathetic liberals sound like five-year olds “why don’t you join” or “why don’t you go over there.”

Ok jackass, why don’t you get off your fat lazy liberal @ss the hell off the computer and go build a Habitat For Humanity home for the poor that you care for so much? Pathetic twisted liberals.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 01:56 PM | Link to this

“Do you want the plan to succeed.” and 22% said NO. The choices were: YES, NO, Don’t know.”

RW has mentioned that FACT many times now and the idiot liberals still don’t get what he’s saying: TWENTY TWO PERCENT OF THOSE POLLED WANTED THE MISSION TO FAIL. That means they are AGAINST THE TROOPS.

Then ignoramus liberal spouts off about Bush ratings. Yet another example why you can’t realy debate with the disease of liberalism. It’s a waste of time. Pathetic.

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 01:57 PM | Link to this

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 01:26 PM | Dennis “Blah Blah” Dahreese, I’m getting the sense that you are a congenital liar.

Bush and the troops are two totally different issues.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 02:06 PM | Link to this

Dahreese,

I’ll try this one more time, futilely I’m sure as your skull seems impenetrable.

The question WAS NOT do you support the plan. The question WAS do you WANT THE PLAN TO SUCCEED.

Got it?

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 02:07 PM | Link to this

By WootenDull January 21, 2007 01:50 PM | By Dennis January 21, 2007 01:24 PM The question(s) here is/are the wisdom (rather lack thereof) of GWB; but more importantly the “ethics” of following, willingly or blindly, a policy of willful taking and destruction of the lives and property of another. And ethically it doesn’t matter if the leader is your “Commander In Chief”, GWB, or your local bully.

Dullard: I have no idea what you just said….”

OK, if you say so.

Bush and the troops are two totally different issues.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By Sailor

January 21, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

The Sailor said Andi, you’re a fine girl, such a good wife you would be…

Good to see my little lady and all her cowardly chickenhawk girlfriends are still here… howsit goin’ with my little lollypop girls? And you too Bi Danish?

By Dennis

January 21, 2007 02:13 PM | Link to this

By Markus January 21, 2007 01:56 PM | “Do you want the plan to succeed.” and 22% said NO. The choices were: YES, NO, Don’t know.”

RW has mentioned that FACT many times now and the idiot liberals still don’t get what he’s saying: TWENTY TWO PERCENT OF THOSE POLLED WANTED THE MISSION TO FAIL. That means they are AGAINST THE TROOPS.”

No. It means that the question is rigged to be that if you don’t support Bush/the plan, then you don’t support the troops.

And you have bought in to the rig.

Bush and the troops are two totally different issues.

NO ONE IS AGAINST THE TROOPS.

And no one of any intelligence, still buys the lies of Bush.

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 02:16 PM | Link to this

On second thought maybe I’ll let Dahreese have his fantasy about the poll question and use moonbat math to interpret the poll.

Since according to Dennis 22% don’t support President Bush, moonbat math says VOILA Bush has a 78% approval rating.

Man that first 100 hours of socialism on display in the House has the President’s approval rating soaring!

By Markus

January 21, 2007 02:17 PM | Link to this

How many IDs does this neoFacist conservative jackasshave anyway?

You stupid sick pathetic conservatives sound like five-year olds “why don’t you support our leader” or “why don’t you like America.”

Ok jackass, why don’t you cum in my fat juicy conservative @ss and go build a climax for the w******* that you care for so much? Pathetic twisted conservatives.

By Markus

January 21, 2007 02:30 PM | Link to this

It’s always a good day on the blog when you get ID jacked by a sick twisted filthy neocommunist liberal pig from hell with disgusting language. Only the disease of liberalism…

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 02:56 PM | Link to this

Dahreese,

Why are you quoting the disgusting wanker? Proud that he’s on your side of the aisle?

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 03:20 PM | Link to this

I think I found the metrosexual wanker @ 2:17 giving us some bio details here:

I know a lot of guys who wear leggings around the home to watch DVDs, lounge around before Premiership games or surf the Internet

By Mallory

January 21, 2007 04:36 PM | Link to this

J.Wooten, This Duke University rape case has been a legal fiasco from the start.

Nifong refused to admit it. He was driven in his pursuit of the players. Now he’s on the hot seat and seeking legal representation on ethics violations.

I hope his attorneys are as incompetent and power driven as he was. He deserves no better than his own best attempt to use the sytem as his political playground.

Who’s the victim? Who pays the price?

I’ll put him in the company of Patrick Fitzgerald and the ones looking to seek accountability of Sandy Berger.

Currently, nobody is really looking into that are they? Will they ever?

I doubt it. It’ll be another pass for the democrats.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

January 21, 2007 05:44 PM | Link to this

Mallory,

You’re correct, there is something awry with what counts for justice these days and the no justice no peace crew seems to be meting out the inequities in Durham and elsewhere.

Patrick Fitzgerald’s witch hunt against Libby is a disgrace (as a point of interest, his best friend is James Comey who prosecuted Martha Stewart, using a similar tactic).

Meanwhile, could this have sparked your righteous anger about Sandy Burglar? -

The Archives, the Justice Department and the Sept. 11 commission all insisted that the commission got all the documents it was supposed to, including copies of three that Berger admitted destroying from among the five he admitted he took.

That’s misleading. The two new reports make clear that these five documents, versions of an “after-action” report on an attempted bombing of Los Angeles International Airport, had been cataloged. The Archives staff knew all about them - who wrote them, who got them and what they concerned.

Now we learn something that the Sept. 11 commission was not told. On some visits Berger had access to “Staff Member Office Files” - working papers of individual members of the National Security Council staff, including his own papers and those of terrorism adviser Richard Clarke. These papers had not been cataloged or copied. There is no way of knowing if Berger took anything.

Clearly, Berger was eager to hide something, as shown by one curious fact: The Archives staff tested Berger by noting that Document 217 was missing after one visit; the next time he came the staff gave him another copy of 217 with the comment that it had been inadvertently left out of the last batch. Berger promptly swiped it again.

The Democrats controlling Congress cannot be expected to re-open the Berger case. If the Bush administration knows what Berger was so desperate to hide and can find a way to tell the public without disclosing important secrets, it should

By WootenDull

January 21, 2007 05:47 PM | Link to this

Begone Ain’ts.

Back to Nawlins with you.

Home to your crime infested, corruption ridden pinko playground under the sea, hahaha.

Super Bowl!

You can put it on the board, yesssss!

(Don’t all you “experts” at ESPN feel awful silly about now?)

Yes!

By RW-(the original)

January 21, 2007 05:55 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Here’s more on Fitzgerald’s motivation.

Yet Mr. Fitzgerald has persisted for three long years, and only six weeks into his investigation sought and received an expansion of his authority in order to go after a senior administration official—Mr. Libby—who had had nothing to do with the leak Mr. Fitzgerald was investigating. And he pursued the case even to the extent of creating a Constitutional showdown over reporters and their sources. Why?

As it happens, Messrs. Fitzgerald and Libby had crossed legal paths before. Before he joined the Bush Administration, Mr. Libby had, for a number of years in the 1980s and 1990s, been a lawyer for Marc Rich. Mr. Rich is the oil trader and financier who fled to Switzerland in 1983, just ahead of his indictment for tax-evasion by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Bill Clinton pardoned Mr. Rich in 2001, and so the feds never did get their man. The pardon so infuriated Justice lawyers who had worked on the case that the Southern District promptly launched an investigation into whether the pardon had been “proper.” One former prosecutor we spoke to described the Rich case as “the single most rancorous case in the history of the Southern District.”