Home > Thinking Right > Archives > 2006 > August > 17 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USFlavored condoms recommended
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
“Safer sex, condoms, dental dams and masturbation — welcome to college!” Such is the cheerful greeting parents and students arriving for fall classes at the University of Georgia from Sexual Health Coordinator Michelle Cohen. She’s available for consultation, but has some advice for the general audience: “Condoms can be used for protection during oral, vaginal and anal sex (I recommend flavored condoms for oral sex)…. Dental dams (rectacular, thin pieces of latex) can be used when performing oral-vaginal or oral-anal sex (these can be found in the Health Promotion Department)” where she works. Free condoms, too. “Remember,” she concludes, “safer sex is better sex!”.
When asked later about the reaction of parents and whether it’s appropriate for a university official to recommend flavored condoms for oral sex, Ms. Cohen said she’d received no negative reaction from parents or anybody else. “To the contrary, I have received positive feedback regarding the information I shared” in the Red & Black campus newspaper. She continued:
“According to 2005 National College Health Assessment data, 68.9 % of UGA students reported engaging in oral sex, yet only 2.8 % report using a condom the last time they did…. Promoting use of flavored condoms encourages use of condoms for oral sex.”
Actually some parents did react negatively. “I was heartsick when I saw that,” said one. “That article —written by someone who I assume is paid by taxpayer money — was so unbelievable that I wanted to just pack my child up and take her home.”
OK, I’m conservative. But I’m with the parent. Here we have at Georgia Tech a university-imposed speech code that, until it was thrown out by a federal judge this week at the behest of two conservative students, prohibited dorm conversation school officials thought “intolerant.” So at one of the state’s flagship universities, officials are highly judgmental about what students say, but at the other are entirely non-judgmental to the point of being promotional about conduct that will be far more consequential to their lives.
Most college students do engage in sex at some point and Ms. Cohen may be right about the percentage who engage in oral sex. They are, after all, of the generation that heard from the top that it’s not really sex. And yes, clinics should respond. But I really don’t want the university’s agent pushing flavored condoms for oral sex as a “welcome to college!” experience.
These are Thinking Right’s back-to-school questions: Should universities govern student speech? And how should state institutions approach issues of what students do, and the values they hold, in their personal lives?
Comments
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 08:06 AM | Link to this
Sex? Yes, I remember sex. I’m married, so sex is alien to me now…it’s not that I’m not interested in sex anymore, it’s just that when I ask my wife for sex, it takes her too long to get through the five stages from grief to acceptance……
By Higher Ed
August 17, 2006 08:16 AM | Link to this
I work at one of the top three universities in the state of Georgia, and I have been welcoming our new students in New Student Orientation sessions. I mention the free HIV testing a third party provides twice a month on campus, and I see the looks parents have. They don’t want to think about their children needing such services. But I hear stories from the students (minus their adolescent exaggerations) and it sickens me that students are engaging in risky behaviours. They won’t talk to their parents about it, but they talk to me.
Flavoured condoms are a bit much, in my opinion, and maybe these speeches can be made later on, but we have their undivided attention at New Student Orientation.
By Mid-South Philosopher
August 17, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this
Good morning, Jim,
When my daughters went to college, they didn’t need this information. They had parents who had dealt with this subject appropriately while they were adolescents. However, I realize that, that situation is the “exception” and not the “rule.” That being true, with respect to condoms, dental dams, and other sex education information at state supported schools, I want the information available, but I do not want the school to recruit users. That will happen soon enough. Given the certainty of sex occurring sooner or later with most people and given the abdication of the majority of parents in providing this information, it is incumbent upon society to provide a resource for its distribution.
With respect to speech at the post-secondary level (again, in state supported schools), the same liberties should apply as apply in the general society. I have always lived by the premise that one has the right to his or her opinion and to express it regardless of how stupid it is!
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 08:19 AM | Link to this
Enough said
PF,
Maybe we should go back to college.
By Barry
August 17, 2006 08:22 AM | Link to this
If the parents won’t talk about it, then I’d rather the school nurse or Health Services at UGA talk about it. At least it’s a counter to what the kids are picking up at school.
Besides, the entering freshmen at UGA are 18 or over. They aren’t kids anymore to have their parents regulate everything they see and hear. “I just wanted to pack my child up and take her home,” said the mother. Well, she’d better get used to the fact that she’s the mother of a woman, not a child. That’s tough to do, I know.
Flavored condoms, IUDs, and birth control pills aren’t more likely to make college students have sex. They just make it less likely to have undesirable side effects. ;)
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 08:23 AM | Link to this
One day you complain about people having babies out of wedlock, the next day your panties are in a knot because someone advocates the use of condoms.
By Jim Wooten
August 17, 2006 08:26 AM | Link to this
Morning Philosopher and others. Certainly young students should have access to information. This, I think, goes beyond that.
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 08:30 AM | Link to this
Should universities govern student speech?
Which part of freedom of speech do you wingnuts not understand? No.
And how should state institutions approach issues of what students do, and the values they hold, in their personal lives?
Which part of personal do wingnuts not understand? Stay out of their personal lives wingnuts.
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 08:30 AM | Link to this
Orientation is the perfect time to get the “kids” excited about condoms and stuff. As you all know, as soon as the parents leave that night, all of the freshman are headed to their first college party to drink keg beer and be wooed by older college boys.
Hopefully, they’ll pick up the goodies before they go to the party because we all know once they are at there, all bets are out the door.
By passerby
August 17, 2006 08:37 AM | Link to this
Is there any difference in the right wingers that want to control everyone’s thoughts, morals, personal lives, etc? Is there one bit of difference between them and Fidel Castro? Hugo Chavez? The Saudi Royal Family? The Taliban? They all seem to want the same thing. A populace living just as they think it should whether willing or not. These right wingers are the biggest threat to our freedom in this country today.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this
If any person thinks that college is not a no-holds-barred free-for-all sex orgy, (and has been for forty years), then that person is a born-again, neoconned Ralph Reedite. Are we to believe that Mr. Wooten is a fascist, racist celibate? I dont think he is, he just wants emoting on this blog. Bring up race? Wow. Bring up Bush war powers? Wow. Bring up sex? Look out below, (pun intended)……ew.
See, you’re supposed to have sex when you’re in college, because after college is the barren dry spell called marriage.
My wife is such a hypochondriac, that it just ruins sex. Everything hurts her. She’s always reading a medical book of symptoms to see what disease of the day she can complain about. She has five digital thermometers for each one of her orafices. She’s like, “Gee, the temperature under my tongue is three degrees warmer than the temperature in my a**….I wonder what that means…?”
I’m like, “It means I’ll take a BJ instead, okay? Now you want to get the Mayo Clinic off the bed, Nurse Ratched?”
That’s why I recommend eight years of college all the way to a doctorate. Find yourself in education, young man.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 08:47 AM | Link to this
A bj with a flavored condom? uh, thanks but no thanks. Why even bother? And a dental dam? Are you serious? What planet are you people from? Do you remember being 18-21 and in college? Do you REALLY think in the heat, and ok, drunken stupor, of the monent, that these young boys and girls are whipping these devices/saran wrap/kiwi prophylactics out and using them? It aint happening folks! And I dont recall seeing any studies that orally transmitted STD’s are rampant at our nations universities either. This is nothing but another liberal hairy armpit feminazi thinking she is saving the world by promoting and joking about being sexually promiscuous in college. We can thank Slick Willy for making young girls all over the world think its “cool” and “popular” to give head by age 12. I personally think the time and money would be better spent talking to the students about abstinence and the consequences of making high risk choices, but hey, thats just my crazy conservative Christian extremist viewpoint, right?
Liberals, saving the world, one slut at a time
By Mid-South Philosopher
August 17, 2006 08:51 AM | Link to this
Hey, Jim,
The nature of some of the comments this morning makes me realize just how lucky I am. Suddenly, being old, fat, and ugly doesn’t seem all that bad. While being monogamous, I am, at least, “frequent.” Think I’ll send my lady some flowers!
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 08:52 AM | Link to this
These right wingers are the biggest threat to our freedom in this country today.
Don’t get me started.
Check out this headline
By Georgians in Heat
August 17, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this
Many Georgia men find a way around the pregnancy thing by having sex with the pre-pubescent.
Anybody surprised Jon Benet’s killer is from Georgia?
By Realist
August 17, 2006 08:54 AM | Link to this
PF, I can relate to your post. Every time I go back to a ball game at my alma mater Im thinking, “why exactly did I leave here again?” But then, a sweet young sorority girl bumps into me and says, “oh excuse me SIR”, and I drag my sorry a* to my seat and say to my wife, “yes dear, Ill go get the popcorn”.
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 08:54 AM | Link to this
Don’t blame Clinton because your wives and daughters are blowing everyone.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 08:56 AM | Link to this
And Al Queera, the biggest non-threat to our freedom or anything else are liberal bloggers. Simply meaningless.
By Fall Line
August 17, 2006 08:57 AM | Link to this
It seems that everyone wants to be the parent. Everyone thinks they can do a better job. Even if it’s true, they don’t have the standing to be the parent. Schools need to worry about academic issues and let the parents and the students work out the social things.
I see all of this brouhaha as the inevitable result of the “trophies for all” mentality that wants to protect every child from the realities of life and social interaction.
Not only do students have the right to free speech on campus, I believe they have the right to as mean and insensitive to the next student as they want to be. Let society sort them out in the real world.
By KP
August 17, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this
Girls were giving head long before the Blewinski scandal. Ask any athlete, fraternity member, or guy period. The girls on sorority row were taught by their mom that head was 3rd base. KKG, DDD, KD, Phi Mu, Chi Omega’s…I can keep going, and going and tell you from personal knowledge that its the next thing to kissing. KP runs and jumps for school…lets blw him our appreciation! Good job UGA, protecting a few that will use the dental dams is better than none with no access to them.
By Michael Silly Savage
August 17, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this
These insatiable women and their sexual demands are sapping the strength of the American male - and keeping us away from our “male-bonding” time.
;>
By somebody's wife
August 17, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this
Hey,now, you wife bashers, not all of us are avoiding the horizontal tango. You just have to keep it interesting and, uhm, mutually beneficial.
And condoms for oral sex is not happenin’, flavors or not.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this
My wife complains that I no longer speak those sweet soft nothings in her ear anymore…….WELL I’M NO HORSE WHISPERER!!!!
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this
Realist,
We get older and they stay the same age.
To everyone else,
It’s really funny how some parents automatically assume that every other kid engages in sexual activity except for theirs. Let me tell you something, when you drop Bobby or Sally off at the dorm, they will be on the prowl immediately. What do you expect? More an more kids engage in oral sex as an alternative to sexual intercourse in order to prevent STDs, pregnancy, and virtue (I still wonder about that). I don’t think that we should criticize an institution for promoting safe sex among college students. In fact, we should encourage them. As for flavored condoms…if that is an incentive for kids to use them more often then so be it. I’m sure others on this blog have freakier sex lives than that.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 09:06 AM | Link to this
Yeah I can go on and on too KP. I was an athlete and a KA, and not that long ago. You are correct, it has gone on and will forever. And to think anyone is going to use a piece of plastic to give head is INSANE. This is not an area that we need the education system or government intervening in. Its a waste of time and money. End of story.
By Lush Rim Job
August 17, 2006 09:07 AM | Link to this
Feminazis have created a sex-obsessed culture that pollutes our young people and distracts the American man from more manly pursuits like war and wrestling.
That’s why I like to spend time with muscular males, especially a military man like Jeff Gannon/Guckert. I also enjoy the lean spare forms of black males in early puberty, and I travel to the Dominican alot.
By ckt
August 17, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this
Nice subtle technique to blame it all on the democrats and Clinton.
Yes, advertising for flavored condoms is a bit much, but i’d rather have too much than none at all.
As far as the speech code at Tech. I believe that both parties are in a tight-spot there. The conservative students because they have a point, but are fighting for a political statement. The school because the constraint was wrong, but are trying to prevent harassment. Speaking out against gays and bisexuals (which, regardless of what the conservative students may say, IS THE ISSUE) is one thing - making life difficult and painful for them is a whole new ballgame. There simply is no clean solution to this - how do you allow everyone the rights to free speech, but provent bigots from making others lives more difficult?
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this
Midsouth, Oprah says that the way to more romance in a marriage is not to buy flowers, but to do a chore without being asked. Get involved.
My wife likes that idea so much she’s been handing me coupons that read, “Wash the dishes, get a sex act of lesser or equal value”.
I guess this works okay, but lately, my neighbor’s been taking my trash out. What does he want?
By Realist
August 17, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this
If you want to really scare parents to death, show them the study that 1 of 3 female graduating college seniors had thier first lesbian experience while in college. Shazaaam!
By KP
August 17, 2006 09:11 AM | Link to this
Realist,
Tell me this if you can…Is there a differenc between KA and KA Order?
By Kneel and Bob Boortz
August 17, 2006 09:11 AM | Link to this
Did someone mention BJs?
They are the one thing in life that I think is better to give than recieve.
;>
By Realist
August 17, 2006 09:12 AM | Link to this
Most us just say KA because not many know the Order part. It confuses. Yes, I was a member of KA Order.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:13 AM | Link to this
Lately, my wife’s excuse for no sex is that she gets motion sickness. She avoids elevators, escalators, hell, she cant even stand up anywhere near the ocean beach because of “continental drift”.
By Ken/Kendra Starr
August 17, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this
I gotta tell you - the best sex I ever had in my life was listening to Monica testify about her special time with President Clinton.
That and sniffing the spot on her GAP dress - God, how bad I wanted to taste it!
By Mid-South Philosopher
August 17, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this
Hey, Political Foreskin,
I am familiar with “quid pro quo” technique.
As for your neighbor, clean the bathrooms! That will knock out almost any competition.
By KP
August 17, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this
Alcohol + 2 girls + Camera = lesbian experience. Ever watch the Kiss Cam at Hawk or Brave games?
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 09:16 AM | Link to this
All joking aside … One can kinda see where some universities are coming from. They try to control the “population” because when a student, or group of students, does something the stupid, the school gets the ridicule. Let’s ask the administrators at Duke what happens when students go astray.
By Captain Freedom
August 17, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this
The Captain fin*s it dif6icult to tupe with only one handddd, and will thus keep things brief.
No, wait…
There. That’s better.
All this talk about sex in college, as though that ever really happens. I am a college graduate, and I can attest that the idea that sex is rampant in our dorms is yet another liberal myth designed to chip away at our masculine confidence. Of course, President Clenis is the worst offender of this, leading us to believe that chubby young vixens will service our virility in such vile ways.
It’s all really quite disgusting.
And speaking of disgusting, did anyone notice that the AJC obviously photoshopped the picture of the JonBenet pervert to look just like Ralph Reed. Clearly another liberal plot to undermine the godly Reed.
By The Kimmer
August 17, 2006 09:18 AM | Link to this
All this BJ talk is making me so horney!
Any of you guys want to be a Kimmer Babe?
By KP
August 17, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this
Jim has opened a can of worms today…female bloggers beware..lol
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this
Why doesn’t someone circumcise bigoted foreskin???
He’s about as funny as a cup of cold vomit!!
No one is attempting to prevent discussion on the issue of college age student sexual activities. It is the graphic nature of what this very liberal tax payer funded college seems to think is perfectly normal and reasonable to shove down the throats of ALL students. Regardless of their background. Regardless of the sensibiliteis of students who dont indulge in this kind of behaviour and their parents who likely are funding (much if not all) of their education and dont want/expect to be confronted with such graphic propaganda on behalf of buttock bouncers and what many of them likely construe as no holds barred sexual depravity!!
Contained within this mornings article is also the telling point that a far left college has been reasonably prevented by a judge from rampaging on behalf of buttock bouncers and buttock bouncing - thus now critical speech and free speech is allowed on the subject by religious types about the left’s favourite limp wristed minority.
Its a contrast of how lefties think college kiddies should be controlled on certain sexually graphic issues if the lefties had their unfettered way - NO religiously inspired criticism of buttock bouncing and an extremely graphic sexually charged description of the kind of activities and condoms etc that 18/19 year olds supposedly normally indulge in when on this leftist controlled campus. If not ‘deemed’ normal or at least fairly common - then why present such tax payer funded explicit, graphic material for public consumption?
Simple enough when you actually WANT to se what todays subject is!!
Bet our dusky resident homo activist Harold starts simpering and screeching about this!!
By TerriB
August 17, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this
I am appalled at the comments here….guess I shouldn’t be, the left is always the most vocal. Obviously there’s a lot of sexual activity happening at any college campus, but that doesn’t make it right!! So, we just hand out the goods and say, “well, we know you’re gonna do it anyway”??? Lots of high school kids are smoking dope, too, so should be just buy the stuff for them?? PUH-LEEZ, let’s at least try to guide our young people. In the end, they make their own choices but without guidance, it’s a lot more likely that those choices will have negative consequences!
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this
Well!
By SamX
August 17, 2006 09:23 AM | Link to this
This situation cries out for a compromise. Instead of condoms they should use stickers. One sticker placed over the “strategic area” should please social conservatives and liberals alike.
This sticker contains material for safe sex. Safe sex is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.
By Captain Freedom
August 17, 2006 09:24 AM | Link to this
Actually, the more I look at the photo of the JonBenet skeeve, the more I think it might actually BE Ralph Reed. Maybe a very good Photoshop, but it’s so hard to tell. Not sure, mind, just a hunch.
To quote the great Peggy Noonan: “Is it irresponsible to speculate? It would be irresponsible not to!”
By Dana
August 17, 2006 09:25 AM | Link to this
Good Morning! I haven’t decided whether to laugh or get irritated yet, so I flipped a coin, and you get sarcastic humour this morning.
Feminazis,hm? Promotion of safe sex, using (GASP!) OUR TAX MONEY! Liberals responsible for rampant sex among our adult children away at college… Yeah, THAT makes sense to me now! What was I thinking??? See, all this time, I thought it was MY job to raise my daughter to respect herself enough to wait. And to understand what to do if she couldn’t.
This subject, and today’s blog, should be interesting. I find it curious that conservatives, who can sometimes be violently anti-abortion, are also the biggest opponents of providing adequate education and protection to the very young women they would revile should they ever seek to terminate a pregnancy.
By Hannity Poo
August 17, 2006 09:25 AM | Link to this
I am so tired of being O’Reilly’s b@ttboy - he makes me wear those silly dresses and covers my bum with tzatziki sauce. Then he licks it off while he’s talking on the phone. He has to scream so he can be heard over the noise of the vibrator.
It ain’t easy being pretty.
By Captain Freedom
August 17, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this
No, it just can’t be. Ralph is into gambling stuff and avarice, not this fleshly kind of sin.
By Interested Observer
August 17, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this
Jim,
As reluctant as I am to admit it (!), I think you’re on the money with this one. You’re right, this information should of course be available to students, but I agree it shouldn’t be thrown in the face of parents bringing their kids to college for the first time.
By jbmlaw
August 17, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this
Incredible that our schools of purported-higher learning deem this a matter useful to their mission. On the other hand, it is fully consistent with program that mandate “ethnic and diversity” courses, while slighting the truly useful accounting and economic courses that all informed citizens need. The entirety speaks volumes about the competence of our university administrators and trustees.
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 09:27 AM | Link to this
Jim, you should be taken to Guantanamo and flogged for this one.
By Slick Willie
August 17, 2006 09:29 AM | Link to this
I think Jim flogged himself while writing this one.
By Ralphie Reed
August 17, 2006 09:30 AM | Link to this
Oh - I am surrounded by sin, WE are surrounded by sin!
Anybody want to get on their knees and come pray with me? Meet me in the rest room at the rest stop on I-85 near Flowery Branch.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this
diversity courses and ethnic courses and wimmins studies courses are the most nauseating of all - NO ONE needs to be told how and what to think!! To have to pay for this often mandatory leftist garbage is actually educational fascism!!
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this
Methinks this one backfired on Jim.
By deegee
August 17, 2006 09:33 AM | Link to this
Parents should watch MTV, VH1 and BET for a few weeks before they accompany their kids to college. That should give them the proper perspective when attending the orientation classes. Actually, they should watch these channels before they accompany their kids to middle school and high school orientation.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 09:33 AM | Link to this
Amelia you should be fed to Hamas for that post!!
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this
I’m taking bets on tomorrow’s topic being abortion. We’ve covered war, race and now sex — all conservatives have left is abortion.
By Watta Load
August 17, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this
Just what flavors are we talking about here?
By Captain Freedom
August 17, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this
And to think that mandatory ROTC has been eliminated in favor of this nonsense. I learned more about life in my 2 quarters of ROTC (before my pilondial cyst acted up and I was discharged) than any other experience ever.
It even included useful sex ed information, not this propagandistic nonsense of flavored condos, but real knowledge like:
This is my pistol This is my gun One is for killing One is for fun
By Dana
August 17, 2006 09:36 AM | Link to this
Here is a question - Is college for the student, or the parent? I can’t say as I ever fancied sticking my head in the sand and pretending that I don’t know what is going on with my child. As a mom, would I like to think my college age daughter was still chaste? YES. Am I naive enough to believe it would change based on the availability of condoms? Uh, that would be no.
By Manny Coulter
August 17, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this
I’m all for giving oral sex - it keeps ‘em guessing as to if you’re packin’.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 09:38 AM | Link to this
So we have a (cyber) concourse of liberal buggers this morning!!
Gonna be a free for all crude abuse day on the forum.
LOVELY JUBBLY!!
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:38 AM | Link to this
no matter what flavors are listed on the box, all condoms end up being lickorice.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:40 AM | Link to this
Pilondial Cyst!
Great stuff!!
bravo.
By Gerogians in Heat
August 17, 2006 09:40 AM | Link to this
Since most Georgians are conceived during drunk sex or rape, are condoms really going to help?
By Dana
August 17, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this
Well Hello CF! Now that I understand your condition, you have my sympathy honey!
Pilondial cyst is very often in people who have a sedentary lifestyle, it is more often in male population than in females.
Now get up off your hairy butt and get some work done!
Yeah, I had to look it up on google. You poor thing! A pimple on your tush!
By Van
August 17, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this
Please clear this up for me. The purpose of higher education is what???
Is it to fill impressionable heads with flavored condoms or teach them how to learn and think?
We have had a President that gave us “The Lewinski”, is this where it is coming from? Is it a left over from the frauds and failures of the summer of love? Is it a continuation of the revolt against parental control?
Whatever it may be, we as tax payers need not fund it.
Call me old fashion, but it has served me well and taught me too many hard earned lessons, the old fashion way.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 09:44 AM | Link to this
Very funny stuff from different bloggers this morning. Great with coffee, and thank you all for the laughs.
But I should, out of respect for my friend across the aisle, Mr. Wooten, at least attempt to comment on the topic, which is privacy.
If we have to screen for terrorists and nymphs, then we’ll be overwhelmed and the terrorists win.
Therefore, I say we screen for terrorists, but merely pray for the sinners as our heavenly father Ralph Reed has instructed us so thusly aforthwith, and amenishizzle.
By KP
August 17, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this
TFTT…..damn son…you really went there.
By Dana
August 17, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this
TFTT, what in the hell are you talking about?
By Redneck Convert
August 17, 2006 09:52 AM | Link to this
No one should have you-know-what except me, specially at them colleges. If they talk to students about condoms and them things, the students might have you-know-what, and since I cant be there, they would be having you-know-what with someone other than me. They should have prayers about ten times a day and put God back in colleges. They should never, never mention you-know-what to students and parents. They should be like me and the missus. We have lots of you-know-what, but we never talk about it. I think she likes it but cant be sure. Anyway, I dont care. Me, Wooten, and TFTT has the Right view of all this.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 09:52 AM | Link to this
KP … WHAT??? I’m just having fun too!! by merely handing back some of the abuse being handed out - the point is INDEFENSIBLE too -lefties are giant hypocrites when it comes to using f* abuse!!
By deegee
August 17, 2006 09:53 AM | Link to this
who really cares?
By Georgians in Heat
August 17, 2006 09:53 AM | Link to this
Van, James Dickey wrote Deliverance in the 1960s, and it hit the screens in 1973, some 25 years before Ms. Lewinsky - it seems that when it comes to sodomy, Georgia has always been ahead of the times.
Thanks to your friends and neighbors, north Georgia rivals San Francisco as an international center for same-sex sodomy.
Or is it just heterosexual sodomy that bothers you?
By SamX
August 17, 2006 09:53 AM | Link to this
How ridiculous. They need to put an end to this now. The only thing that works is abstinence.
That lady should be handing out abstinence pledges instead of condoms. These pledges should not be put on any flavored paper either. The paper should be bitter and foul tasting, just like marriage.
WARNING: If students choose to eat their pledge paper it could make them sick and hair could end up growing from the palms of their hands.
By KP
August 17, 2006 09:55 AM | Link to this
TFTT,
I see, I see..the boldness of it was evident. Just don’t get angry on here…I’d hate to see what happens then.
By Georgians in Heat
August 17, 2006 09:56 AM | Link to this
Due to his bold comments, methinks that the poster time for the truth doth protest too much.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 09:56 AM | Link to this
Dana you are obviously being deliberately very dim today
By The Skipper
August 17, 2006 09:59 AM | Link to this
time for the truth, come here little buddy.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:00 AM | Link to this
KP …
the boldness was simply to make the intellectually honest point stand out in a sea of hypocritical leftist queer abuse
I’m not at all angry mate - this is bloody hilarious - we ALL see what despicable dissembling moral cowards the left are!!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:01 AM | Link to this
see how easy it is to get the leftist vermin to bite!!
By Dana
August 17, 2006 10:01 AM | Link to this
tftt, Either I missed something, (which I am sure you will point out to me) or you have totally lost your mind. So far today, I see mainly nonsense. Which is just as well, I have a lot to accomplish today so I might as well stop hanging out in here, wouldn’t want to develop one of CF’s Pilondial Cysts….
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:02 AM | Link to this
OFF TOPIC
Here is a little heart warming tidbit for you anti-Bush anti-war left wingers.
LAMONT TRAILS BY LARGE MARGIN
The Quinnipiac University poll has Lieberman leading Lamont among registered voters 49 percent to 38 percent. Republican Alan Schlesinger gets support from 4 percent. Among likely voters, Lieberman was supported by 53 percent, compared to Lamont’s 41 percent and Schlesinger’s 4 percent.
By Watta Load
August 17, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this
Mmmmm…I like lime.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this
Pilondial Cysts!!
Great stuff!!
Bravo
By Screaming Georgia Queens
August 17, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this
Not as well closeted as they would have us think…
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this
dana — I have posted the point several times now … you are being a dishonest troll!!
By sct
August 17, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this
Great post Realist. It just goes to show how far Republicans have fallen!
The liberal Independent and the liberal Democrat represent 94% of the total.
The Republican candidate 4%, how pathetic.
By KP
August 17, 2006 10:09 AM | Link to this
Yeah, the topic is garbage today. So many other things to talk about, Mark Taylor and his ethics issues, Senator Allen and his Macaca issues, Jon Benet’s murderer fitting the profile, another rapper arrested in Atlanta with drugs. Stories for left and right to fight about. Adios people!
By Queens of the Mountains
August 17, 2006 10:10 AM | Link to this
time for the truth will find this interesting - a study of fellow homophobes right here at UGA
By Queen for a day
August 17, 2006 10:10 AM | Link to this
Honey..if you have to explain your cleverness…it ain’t that clever.
And itt’s not hypocritical if you make fun of yourself…sweetness.
By the way sugar…what’s your favorite flavor?
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this
Its connecticut you horses a*. As if a republican is ever going to carry that state. You damned right us decent conservative americans support lieberman because he has character and is a decent human being. He also has the sense to support the war in Iraq and stand behind our president and our troops. I dont any republicans that didnt like lieberman even before anyone heard of the cable tv installinging SOB Lamont.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this
keep choking on that leftist Bush hating kool aid sct … the hilarious national joke will be when Lamont is hammered and the DNC have to come crawling in Nov to deal with LIEberman who beat their official candidate. Its GOP voters you moron who are giving him his lead - its called tactical voting. CHRIST YOU LEFTIES ARE real MORONS!!
By sct
August 17, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this
4% - LMAO!
By Kinky Southerner
August 17, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this
Jon Benet’s killer has family in Atlanta, and he grew up in ‘bama.
Karr in Alabama
Nate Karr said his younger brother lived with grandparents in Alabama, where he went to high school and college and where he went on to become a teacher.
Bravell Jackson, superintendant of Marion County Schools in Alabama, said he knew Carr as a young boy and taught him in physical education at Hamilton Elementary School.
He said Karr graduated from Hamilton High School around 1983, and for a time was a substitute teacher at the elementary school. “He wasn’t here very long, for about 15 days in August and September of 1996, and I had to remove him from the sub list,” said Jackson. “There were some complaints from parents. I can’t say more than that.”
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:21 AM | Link to this
BUSH WINS IN 2000
BUSH WINS IN 2004
LMFAO!!!
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this
Al Gore LMAO!
Hillary LMMFAO
Lamont ROFLMMFAO
Dean ROFCLMFFAO
Feingold ROFCLMGDMFAO
In the words of that wise man and scolar, A. Ventura……..LAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSER!
By Jim Wooten
August 17, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this
We’re adrift — and there are young conservatatives-in-training who drop in. I am a great believer in free speech and think colleges shouldn’t have speech codes. But there is a difference in what you say with your name attached and what you say anonymously.
The questions are: Should universities govern student speech? And how should state institutions approach issues of what students do, and the values they hold, in their personal lives? I generally agree with Fall Line’s 8:57 post.
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 10:24 AM | Link to this
Bush could take a “crap” in “lies” and “Realracist” mouths and they would call it ice cream.
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 10:25 AM | Link to this
Jim - No and They shouldn’t. Next topic.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this
I see rednekks vermin is back on its kick of ‘anonymously’ projecting its favourite disgusting fantasy.
have the guts to post under your first id rednekkks - not your 2389th
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this
And just who do you think those that will go with Joe in the general election are? Probably moderate republicans and democrats. The true majority in this country. I am hoping that Joe’s run will give rise to moderate candidates that will be attractive to the above group of voters. It is crucial that the true majority in this country totally kill the lunatic wings of both parties. Especially the right. The right wingers are truly dangerous to our freedoms. The left wingers are so far out there that they can just be ignored. There just plain looney.
By sct
August 17, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this
Realist, your FA could use a condom.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
So Amelia am I a right winger lunatic if I support our mission in Iraq and our stand behind our President? Because whether the liberal bloggers (who are the left winger lunatics) admit it or not, you are correct. It is the moderate conservative and moderate democrats (the majority of which support the war and our troops) who will get the votes. The polls are clear on this, despite the slant the ultra-libs and thier media whores are trying to put on it.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
sct … your parents should have used some spermicide!!
By CBF
August 17, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
In case anyone wonders “Lush Rim Job” is NOT ME despite the refernce to wrestling! In my days as a wrestler I only appreciated other males for the chance to bust skulls. To get my other interest it takes a curvy female, preferably between the age of 40 and 55. Seriously though, in this case I must agree with Mr. Wooten. Information is great but this is a bit much.
By Dana
August 17, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
OK, Jim, One comment on topic and then I’m out.
Freedom of speech should be clear everywhere. However, I can agree that some discretion and courtesy can still be present when excersizing that freedom. I don’t have any issue with the information being freely available, but it sounds like she (and the school) could have been more considerate of the parents sensibilities than they were.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this
the intense hypocritical lefty homosexual type abuse says more about them than anything a conservative could … thanks for finally revealing the true level/nature of leftist bloggers!!
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this
Your boy Cheney
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:39 AM | Link to this
Jim, Regarding ones status as young-conservative, moderate conservative, experienced conservative, neo-conservative, fiscal conservative, and so on, unless one holds an office and is affecting policy and change personally, then each persons vote carries exactly the same weight socially and politically, right. I mean an 18 year old would be rapper from the ghetto can cast one vote and cancel out a whole years worth of blogging by a professional experienced conservative doing his best to preach the conservative gospel. Yes, Im a young conservative, but I wont ever get so full of myself that I think Im really making much of a difference. If I truly wanted to make a difference Id try to get my name on one of those ballots. Am I wrong?
By Rod
August 17, 2006 10:40 AM | Link to this
TTFT has proven in his posts today that he really is a jacka$$ with no sense of reality. All he can ever do is blame others for his problems in life. Hey TTFT, why don’t you go take a long walk off a short pier?
By Kneel and Bob Boortz
August 17, 2006 10:43 AM | Link to this
Good for you, CBF - I think we should “meat” - I’m a little beefy, and I don’t mind wearing a dress.
Of course you can slap me around after we’ve done the dirty deed.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this
Yeah CBF, becuase you know, when we think wrestling, we automatically think CBF and what a tough skull buster you are? Jesus, what are you high on man? Get a life.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this
TTFT has proven in his posts today that he really is a jacka$$ with no sense of reality. All he can ever do is blame others for his problems in life. Hey TTFT, why don’t you go take a long walk off a short pier?
funny isn’t it - the lefties can hand out hysterical crude/homosexual abuse but they sure cant take it when soneone hands it back to them!! poor wiittle brainless snookums - did the nasty clever conservative get under your smug dissembling lefty skin today!!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:48 AM | Link to this
TTFT has proven in his posts today that he really is a jacka$$ with no sense of reality. All he can ever do is blame others for his problems in life. Hey TTFT, why don’t you go take a long walk off a short pier?
funny isn’t it - the lefties can hand out hysterical crude/homosexual abuse which they very stridently condemn conservatives and christians for - but they sure cant take it when someone hands it back to them!! poor wiittle brainless snookums - did the nasty clever conservative get under your smug dissembling lefty skin today!!
By Dana
August 17, 2006 10:49 AM | Link to this
No, tftt, we just think you are being exceptionally moronic today. Assuming you are actually you, that is… And you are straying WAY off topic. Come on back to reality for a little while.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this
your moronic intellectual dishonesty is freaking hilarious dana … I am on RIGHT topic, I’m discussing the blatant hypocrisy of the left when it comes to speech codes and homosexuality!!
By Dana
August 17, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this
lol… have a good day little one. Go ahead and take your medication, it will be alright in a little while!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 11:00 AM | Link to this
never mind eh love - get an adult with a brain to explain in real simpleton tones to you (though even that is asking a lot) the concept of hypocrisy and how using sneers about something you decry others for doing is quite acceptable when you (lefties) do it!!
By J Tom
August 17, 2006 11:03 AM | Link to this
Realist - If that professional experienced conservative changed one vote, he made an impact that the rapper would likely never make. Also, I think history shows that people NOT on a ballot have made much bigger differences than many elected officials. Limbough likely impacted the ‘94 Republican sweep of Congress. O’Reilly pushes people in the same direction.
I think you’re being too modest. Judging from your input on this blog, you probably influence your friends and family far more than you give yourself credit.
Keep in mind, too, that people who know people who know people read these blogs. I suspect if some really good ideas are presented here that they have a chance of being routed to the right person. I doubt if Jim would resist putting some of those ideas in his columns if he deemed them worthy. What say you, Jim?
By JK
August 17, 2006 11:05 AM | Link to this
To stay on topic: Free speech on campus: YES! Controlling students: To attempt is to cause more problems than to solve. Education is the whole point of school, isnt’ it? Educate them thoroughly, and yes, they should know about contraceptive and safety devices. Their choices are their own to live with.
Please note: Some regular posters are so obssessed with Clinton’s working member that they cannot get it out of their minds for even a day. They are jealous that he called someone else for his gratification needs. They insert the former President into any conversation they can, no matter how unrelated. Why? They love him, and they hate themselves for it. (It’s okay Van. Just breathe.) They dream about sharing a special moment. Their lives are hollow and bitter, but they’re still holding out hope. They have already put birthday cards in the mail. “Call me!” they pray. “Please… feel my pain, Mr. President!”
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 11:05 AM | Link to this
By Realist
August 17, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
So Amelia am I a right winger lunatic if I support our mission in Iraq and our stand behind our President? Because whether the liberal bloggers (who are the left winger lunatics) admit it or not, you are correct. It is the moderate conservative and moderate democrats (the majority of which support the war and our troops) who will get the votes. The polls are clear on this, despite the slant the ultra-libs and thier media whores are trying to put on it.
No Realist. And if I lived in Conn. I would vote for Joe.
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 11:09 AM | Link to this
Joe Lieberman is more than a one trick pony. He votes with the democrats 90% of the time. His support for Iraq does not override his entire agenda. He is a true moderate as am I. My point was that it is a very indicative sign when he is running so far ahead in the race now. It is very very obvious that his support is from people that are disavowing the lunatic fringes of both parties. And it is about time.
By deegee
August 17, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this
How can a university govern student speech? People can say whatever they want to and if someone is offended then they can either ignore it or take action if it is libelous or slanderous. I don’t see any need for college administrators to invent new avenues of redress via speec codes for someone that has a legitimate complaint. No one should have to support any political or religious organization nor their beliefs in their matriculation fees.
If a student’s personal values are such that their actions infringe on the constitutional rights of another student then they should be expelled. Consentual sex between two adult students is fine regardless of how they agree to do it. Rape is a problem. Given that sexually active college students tend to be promiscous, and unlike the old days when you could kill whatever you got with a dose of penicillin, discussions about safe sex are appropriate.
By Jim Wooten
August 17, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this
Realist, young conservative, at some point you may want to put your name on a ballot. But before you do, it’s important to know what you believe and why. An awful lot of people who put their names on ballots don’t. The value of the debate here is that you are able to hear solid arguments from the other side and test your own. Good luck.
By GA Tech Homo
August 17, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this
I’m a gay Tech student and it’s fine with me if that cow is not restricted from spewing her religious anti-gay crap. And I’m not going to restrict my hand from slapping her self-righteous face when she tells me I’m going to hell.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this
Thanks J Tom, I appreciate your post. I think I was just barking a little after being bitten by the Alpha Dog.
Amelia, You are correct and I think we agree on this. The far left and right fringers are both scary. I just happen to think the media is giving more air time and legitimacy to the leftist lunatics, when in reality, they have no chance at the polls.
And as always, welcome in JK. I cant say Im shocked at your stance on the flavored condom issue. You have represented the morally deficient well with your post.
By deegee
August 17, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this
There are plenty of private colleges with religious and political affilitations. Those that want that experience can pay for it, not me with my tax dollars.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this
Regarding Georgia Tech getting that asinine “speech code” thrown out, Praise Be To God! Only liberals would attempt to shut down free speech for “offensive” reasons, specifically “offensive” to them. All across America universities and colleges are showing increased intolerance towards anyone or any group that they deem “offensive” or speaking or promoting an “intolerant tone.” Read that as conservative thought that’s offensive to them. Hell all you have to do is read the vitriol from the whack job loon liberals on this board to see where their mindset is.
There was a big stink a few years ago at UGA when a small group of conservative students tried to hand out flyers about their new club. Some students (those wonderful, all-peaceful, all-tolerant liberals) physically threatened this small group. How laughable. I wish I could’ve been there. It would have been ON. Uh-oh, did I say something just then that might be offensive to a bedwetting liberal? Awe, anyone need a hankie? But that’s par for the course in Wally World’s Wild Ride of Looney Liberalism.
Conservatives get threatened all the time on political forums. Radio talk show hosts that “offend” liberals by saying something they don’t agree with get threatened all the time. And to think loonbat liberals are all for free speech.* MY @SS. What’s prohibited next in liberal Utopian indoctrination society? “Intolerant THOUGHT?” Oops, we already have that… it’s call a “hate crime.” And the freak fringe left liberals call *Conservatives fascist Nazis…
GA State and an “in your face! approach to sexuality, it’s just another example of the hypocrisy of liberalism. It’s ok for liberals to shove their ideas of what they think is great down our throats, but if conservatives so much as even THINK about opening their mouths on a subject they believe in, all hell breaks loose in liberal la-la land and the threats and lawsuits fly.
While on the subject of the insanity of liberalism and colleges, let’s look at some wonderful ways that loonbat liberals feel are good ways to “diversify” or “enlighten” your wonderful child’s college life under the control of liberal dictator professorships in class offerings:
UMass-Amherst - The Social Construction of Whiteness and Women – learn how to hate White Males
UC-Santa Barbara - Feminist Theories of Science and Feminist Scientists – attempts to validate why few women enter the science field (uhmm.. maybe it’s because they are real WOMEN?)
UC-Santa Cruz - Environmental Inequality – Why it’s not fair to be able to have a suburban home if others have to live in inner city project housing
Yale University - Sociology of Heterosexuality – basically teaches that heterosexuality is culturally created (like nature really has nothing to do with men thinking about sex 30 times a day)
Harvard - Multicultural Biblical Criticism – how new interpretive paradigm transforms the exegesis of Christian Testament (oh I’m feeling so much smarter now)
UC-Berkeley - Topics in Film – takes the “money shot” to a whole new intellectual level
Vassar - Black Marxism – confronting and countering global racism, famine, and poverty (I wonder if they mention Somalia and tribal wars in Africa?)
UCLA - Cultural History of Rap – attempts to validate and humanize the culture of rap (I wonder if they mention night-club shootings and gold chain/Escalade bling stealing?)
Bowdoin Gay and Lesbian Cinema – re-writing history through film (ala Brokeback Mountain and flaming cowboys… gives “Dude Ranch” a whole new meaning)
Duke University Girl Culture – think women turning “butch” and men turning into wussies (seems to me that’s already happening in liberal sheep land)
University of Michigan How to be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation – self-explanitory
University of Pennsylvania Feminist Critique of Christianity – rewriting the Bible for feminazi validation of suppression of Western women (no mention if a sister course on Islam is offered)
Antioch College Cuba: An Experiment in Human Equality – yet more proof that liberals love dictatorships and communism due to “equality for all”
Your tax dollars hard at work in liberal la-la land folks! Can you imagine the uproar from the loonbat liberal left if a college offered a class called “Capitalism and why it works” or “The roots of Christianity in traditional American values?”
Gee thanks loonbat liberals. I am so more enlightened now and feel SO much smarter that those stupid neocons. I don’t even have to worry about terrorism anymore knowing that all we need to do is just leave them alone at tell Israel to go to hell. Ok, who’s got a windmill and a jackass & buggy for sale?
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this
Just send the wingnuts to Liberty University and have them watch and join the 700 club with Pat Robertson.
By sct
August 17, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this
This is all about conservative values. Its ok to use the college campus as a military recruiting place. The military as in killing people in un-provoked wars, also has nothing to do with education.
A condom is a no-no. Teaching ADULTS about the proper techniques on using one is an abomination. Recruiting for war is much more moral and more in line with christian and conservative values.
By JK
August 17, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this
Realist, yes I think young women should have all manner of protection on hand when attending school with the rapists from the KA Order of good, moral, confederate rapist athletes.
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this
Killing=ok
Sex=not okay
Insane!
By CBF
August 17, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this
Realist: in case you didn’t read my last post to you here it is again: Insulting a stranger’s mother is despicable enough to warrant no further communication with you. The rest of you can have at it with this cretin.
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this
Everyone on this board is so wound up right now. Seems to me that you all should go home for a nooner.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 11:39 AM | Link to this
To all you whining “military recruiting on campus” whiners:
I don’t want to hear you candyasses utter ONE MORE WORD about military recruitment numbers from now on. You idiots b!tch when the numbers aren’t met then b!tch when recruiters come to high schools and colleges (as if that NEVER happened until “Bush’s war” in 2003). Idiots.
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this
My husbands cousin got kicked out of Liberty for holding hands with a girl. True story folks.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this
You can label me however you like JK. I happen to hold women in very high regard and wouldnt be what I am today without them. I have reverence for both God and woman, as all men should. And I will never rise taller than when I stoop to the help those with lose morals and corrupt Godless souls, such as yourself.
By Mark the Lib
August 17, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this
Ned Lamont signed his campaign’s death certificate when he allowed Al and Jesse to stand prominently behind each of his shoulders during his victory speech. Hell, I cringed when I saw it. Whites in Conn surely ain’t voting for him now. What a stupid move.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 11:44 AM | Link to this
Hi Liberal. Hope all is well.
It is a little off the chain on both sides for some reason.
CBF, Im scrolling and scrolling and I cant find where I said anything about anyones mothers. That simply isnt my character to do such a thing. I think you got confused somewhere sir.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 11:48 AM | Link to this
Lieberman leads Lamont by 12% in latest poll. What was that you anti-war limpwristed liberals were saying about the “nation” being taken back your ilk? What, are you mental midgets going to blame voter irregularities like McKinney if your boy Lamont loses?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060817/plnm/connecticutlieberman_dc
By sct
August 17, 2006 11:48 AM | Link to this
Yes Jim lets not talk about sex, there could be young conservatives reading this, we don’t want to corrupt them with sin. How about more blogs about wars and killing. Why just this past July a record number of Iraqi’s died in the war. The young conservatives can participate in war talk, no problem there.
Shock and Awe anyone?
By deegee
August 17, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this
Oh that was funny, Realist.
“I happen to hold women in very high regard and wouldnt be what I am today without them.”
Now how does that square with your earlier comment:
“Liberals, saving the world, one slut at a time”
By JK
August 17, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this
And I will never rise taller than when I stoop to the help those with lose morals and corrupt Godless souls, such as yourself.
How gentlemanly! And what manner of help might we expect from a man like you, Mr. Realist? Will you come clear the brush and poison ivy from my yard, and get my homeowner’s association off my a—? A lil’ ol’ gal like me can’t do it all, you know, as I’m busy learning to make biscuits.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 12:01 PM | Link to this
Uh-oh! Just when I posted above about some loonbats giving death threats to those who they don’t agree with, along comes this little jewel right on AJC.com…
“*After Ruth Malhotra and another student filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Georgia Tech in the spring, the outspoken member of College Republicans said she expected some negative reaction.
She was surprised, though, by the death threats and personal attacks.
Some fellow students threatened to choke her between classes. Others said they would throw acid on her at Tech’s graduation.
Someone stuffed her campus mailbox with Twinkies snack cakes —- implying that she was yellow on the outside (Malhotra is Indian) but white on the inside.
Her lawsuit challenges Tech on its campus policies aimed at protecting students from intolerance.*”
link
Intolerance indeed.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 12:02 PM | Link to this
I beleive deegee, I said I hold woman in high regard. One need have more than the proper genitalia to deserve the title or respect. And the same certainly goes for MAN, as Im sure JK can attest from personal experience.
By sct
August 17, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this
You got to love those Conn. voters!
Liberals = 90%…..Republican = 4%
Full steam ahead for the Republican Evolution.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this
@sct-
“You got to love those Conn. voters! Liberals = 90%…..Republican = 4% Full steam ahead for the Republican Evolution”
Thanks for making my point! Your beloved mainstream liberal media went apesqueeze when Lamont beat Lieberman as if it was a victory againt Bush or something. Now it appears Lieberman may win as an independent ala Jim Jeffords. So what’s your point this time?
By Stewart
August 17, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this
SCT,
Your showing your lack of knowledge of the Connecticut voters. Majority or independents or moderate. Approximately 55% will choose a Democratic in a normal election cycle. Obviously Iraq war is skewing these quite a bit.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this
JK, If I knew you personally, a simple mention of your yard woes and homeowner assoc troubles would find me bright and early on a saturday morning helping you without you even having to ask. Thats just how I am.
Regarding biscuits, I cant help there. My mother and grandmother make excellent biscuits. And I believe more than one woman in my life has been brought home to “meet momma” and learned some of those secrets first hand. I suppose that is how some trades or secrets are passed on. Alas, if someone is not the type to be taken home to meet momma, they may never learn these secrets I suppose.
In any case, good look with the yard, and with the biscuits too I reckon.
By Dusty
August 17, 2006 12:16 PM | Link to this
Thinking Right has gone off the deep end. Students are 18 years old? They have parents? Medical doctors?
What are we? Two year olds? We need this discussion like we need a hole in our head.
What next? Another “let it all hang out” discussion on the needs for information about Viagra? Some idiot will say “Yes” and start making jokes. Yep, thinking stupid!
By sct
August 17, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this
So that 4% that back the Republican is some sort of conservative victory????
4%, there’s no message in that? Are you blind?
By Mark the Lib
August 17, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this
Markus You don’t know who threatened her. Probably had nothing to do with her being a Republican, it had to do with her charging prices based on race and gender. Kids that young don’t know what ideology they fall into so you can’t say libs threatened her. She was race-baiting and got threatened, big deal.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 12:22 PM | Link to this
JK can always exploit a few of her beloved always willing illegal mexicans for the gardening and buy some frozen already baked biscuits from Walmart.
By Stewart
August 17, 2006 12:23 PM | Link to this
Mark
August 17, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this
Markus You don’t know who threatened her. Probably had nothing to do with her being a Republican, it had to do with her charging prices based on race and gender. Kids that young don’t know what ideology they fall into so you can’t say libs threatened her. She was race-baiting and got threatened, big deal.
What are you smoking? Kids in college definitely know where they fall in ideology. Your pretty naive if you don’t think it had anything to do with her being a Republican. It can get pretty dicey on these campuses no matter what the issue. And Democrats make everything out to be race related. When I was on campus, the issue was the death penalty. And the democrats made that out to be about race as well.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 12:26 PM | Link to this
that cowardly ga tech homo threatening to slap some lady’s face earlier wasn’t very nice either!!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 12:30 PM | Link to this
4%, there’s no message in that? Are you blind?
sct’s idiocy abounds today …
clearly you are BLIND and can’t read the simple phrase TACTICAL VOTING!!
voting for the lesser enemy’s enemy in this instance makes eminent political sense!!
By Mr. Moose
August 17, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this
Somebody’s wife-I like your style! Most will not wait in the heat of the moment ot whip one out and put it on. Although, I could see those that are afraid to give a bj for fear of the guy blasting off in their mouth doing this. Especially if the condom tastes like a strawberry margarita.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 12:35 PM | Link to this
mr moose … is that YOU rednekkks?
By JK
August 17, 2006 12:36 PM | Link to this
Realist, you are too kind. Like I said before, you profile and stereotype people who disagree with you on matters of public policy. My disagreement (based more on my belief in Christ’s actual message, BTW, than on the contradictory GOP talking points) causes you to assume I am a loose-moraled, drug-addicted, man-hating slut. This is not true of me, and it’s not true of the large portion of the population you label “lefty” or “lib scum” or whatever else you call us. It is with me as you claim about yourself: my hand reaches out in kindness to others all the time, and I’m quite capable of representing the genteel qualities you claim to admire.
Where we diverge, I think, is that I don’t think it’s my place to judge others for being different, while you seem to think it’s your duty. I do enjoy pointing out, perhaps too frankly, the hypocrisies of such judgmenal behavior, while you defend it to the death.
By Voice of Reason
August 17, 2006 12:38 PM | Link to this
Ouch JK, Ouch! lol
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this
“I am a loose-moraled, drug-addicted, man-hating slut….and the portion of the population you label “lefty” or “lib scum”
I’m actually badly torn here between these excellent descriptions of feminazis and liberals. I guess the first one resonates a little more credibly - but its very very close!!
By mr. moose
August 17, 2006 12:46 PM | Link to this
no, I am not a redneck. Gee, what a post.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this
What you call judgemental JK, I call protecting the moral fabric of our society and more importantly, protecting my own children. The rights of individuals to beleive and practice what they want to believe is one thing, but the organized and systematic teaching and preaching of these “beliefs” crosses those boundaries and has no place in government or education. If I have raised my children to believe in abstinence, and day one of thier college experience they are faced with a woman, who clearly comes across as a university official in position of authority, and that person is condoning, and making light of premarital, promiscuous v**** and oral sex, I have every right to be outraged as a parent. This is not a function of the education system. Fine, you want to offer your advice, send out invitations to a seminar, let it be a CHOICE. Thats a word you lib scum love to use right, CHOICE. Wait I forgot, its only called choice when its a right you guys feel entitled to. Otherwise its called “progressive thinking, equal opportunity, or mulitculturism” and it gets shoved down our throats. You guys are sickening. Damn right Im judgemental against hypocrits like you.
By deegee
August 17, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this
Oh, this gets even better. Realist never stands taller than when he is stooping to help….sluts?
By sct
August 17, 2006 12:51 PM | Link to this
Bush got 44% of the Conn. vote in ‘04. The state is represented by more Republicans than Democrats in the US House.
It is not impossible for a Republican to win in Conn. They voted Republican in the ‘88’84’80’76’72 presidental elections.
Yet the Republicans are so weak right now they will sell out their values and vote for a very liberal Senator rather than fight for a Republican. How sad is that.
If this were an endorsement of the current Republican administration this race would be very winnable for a Republican. Republicans might even win a close race because Lieberman and Lamont would split the liberal vote.
A protest vote just goes to show how far down the Republicans are right now. Abandon ship!! Cut and Run.
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 12:55 PM | Link to this
By Dusty
August 17, 2006 12:16 PM What are we? Two year olds? We need this discussion like we need a hole in our head.
Dusty, check to see if the sky is falling. You and I are in complete agreement on something. LOL
By @@
August 17, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this
Jim: I sent my daughter to college with all the information she needed regarding sex. She started asking questions at a young age and I gave her progressive age-appropriate information all through her life.
I did not, however, encourage condoms as though they were one of the 21 flavors that could be found at Baskin Robbins. Ms. Cohen’s approach seemed a little irresponsible and immature by my standards.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this
You know something? Jim Wooten is RIGHT!!! It’s a slippery slope from flavored condoms to edible buttplugs and then scratch-n-sniff underwear…..all the way to Soylent Green…..Remember: Soylent Green was made from PEOPLE!!!!
It’s made from PEOPLE!!!! PEOPLE!!!!!
I think it came in different flavors, like those condoms.
If we dont let the state institutions dictate what goes in people’s mouth, then we’ll all turn into cannibals.
It’s that simple.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this
Realist … in all honesty I must protest that muct too generous last post. Clearly you very nobly and chivalrously pulled your punches and treated one of my favourite feminazis JK with exceptional tolerance and restraint, presumably because of her self confessed “loose-moraled, drug-addicted, man-hating slut” status. I assume she meant all that as a humble Oprah type annonymous confessional - [profuse apologies love if you really didn’t mean it!!].
By Realist
August 17, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this
deegee, parrott, thanks for chiming in. sqwaaaaauk.
Females with loose morals, who frequent the c*ck so often orally and otherwise that they risk STD, and thus need a flavored peice of latex to protect thier mouths, are indeed sluts. Down through time and even in the bible they were mentioned and given different names. I mean how many times does a female have to take into thier mouth a p*** wrapped in ordinary latex until she says, “hmmmm, this rubber is ok, but if it only tasted like a fruit I could feel much better about how Im spending my money and time here at college”.
Dont condemn me for calling a duck a duck. I know one when I hear it quack.
By Mark the Lib
August 17, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this
OK, I’m bored with this topic. See ya tommorrow.
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 01:03 PM | Link to this
Folks,
TFTT hasn’t lost its (him/her who knows) mind. TFTT is here to feed a pathetically misguided desire to matter. “Please let me matter, to someone, anyone, somewhere. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO ME!” To quote: Attention must be paid.
TFTT is not to be taken seriously for these reasons:
TFTT has no mind of its own, it only spouts what it hears others say.
TFTT is a true reactionary. No real ideas despite the empty claims of “visionary conservatism”. Just reaction to others more original and considered thoughts and cries of “librul” and “vermin” and “leftist” to anyone who is even remotely to its right or who dares to disagree with the Hannity talking points it chooses to use for its reaction.
TFTT has built the flimsiest of fake-personas: The wise old Brit here to straighten out us lefty yanks. The problem is that it has never gotten closer to the UK than to watch a little TV in its trailer in Valdosta. But pay close attention to the word in the posts. It is clear for anyone who looks that this jerk-off is a fake. Sentence structure, word choice, it’s all there if you look. Also notice that if no one calls it on this fake Brit garbage the instances of Brit-speak virtually disappear. But call it on this and it comes flowing out like poo through a goose. Suddenly its sod off this and bollocks that. Inconsistency is the author of revelation. (Let the great English Warrior tell you what English thinker and author said that. Any good Brit would know. I do after all.)
Why do I care? I have a good reason which has nothing whatsoever to do with political philosophy. It’s a reason that TFTT has yet to figure out. In others words, it just doesn’t get it.
Its next predictable post will be to either act like I don’t bother it (which I know isn’t true) or to say I’m pathetically obsessed with my intellectual superior, which is the biggest joke of all.
In spite of any bile spewing billingsgate I’ll continue to pop in a few times a week to point out what is rapidly becoming obvious to more and more people.
TFTT is a…
Fake.
By Van
August 17, 2006 01:05 PM | Link to this
I must admit, with the current “progressive” attitutes toward sex seems to have served America well, we have reduced unwanted pregancy(abortion), upheld low morals and suggest that all young people should indulge in as much sex as possible.
Lefties, you win.
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this
I think Jim did this to flush out the really wacked out wingers. Nice work Jim.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this
@ the obsessive anal loser, its time for you to drink that pint of liquid nitrogen - quickly now and all at once!!
By Realist
August 17, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this
Wow Clarkslaw, with that long winded, drawn out, fragmented and run on sentence post, Im actually thinking its you trying desperately to matter. Pot and kettle sir.
Do you have anything to offer to the topic at hand today?
By Jim's Dumb a* topic
August 17, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this
Where’s all the race baiting? War talk? Liberals are slime talk, Neo-Cons are loset gay racist bible thumping turds talk?
This topic can be much better if it stated that the condoms were for all our white daughters to use on those donkey dick black jocks that they scamper after as soon as we drive off campus. That’s reality!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 01:08 PM | Link to this
“I think Jim did this to flush out the really wacked out wingers.”
and here is the feminazi amelia … I thought you were having lunch with Hamas love?
By JK
August 17, 2006 01:10 PM | Link to this
Matthew 7, verses 1-5. Ask your Preacher if it’s right for you! WARNING: Following the actual words of Christ over the words of your political strategist may cause headaches, nausea, diarrhea, hemorrhoids, and unwanted harmony in your home, neighborhood, and world.
See ya on Sunday!
By CBF
August 17, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this
Realist:By CBF August 14, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this Realist: forget my fight-baiting. You didn’t answer my question. Who is evolved or informed enough to tell us how to live?
By Realist August 14, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this CBF, Your mothers sure is hell not, to birth an ape like you.—- Good sir, your opinion is worthless enough for your swipes at me to be instantly forgiven and ignored but leave people’s mothers alone. Sayonara!
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 01:14 PM | Link to this
Realist,
Nope. I never have anything to add. Quite proud of that, as a matter of fact. And it makes no difference whatsoever if I matter to anyone here. My life is fine. So fine in fact that I have others things to do than to sit my fat a* at the computer all day playing poopy pants games like someone I know.
But if I did chose to join the discussion, it would make far more sense than any of the bile I see spewed here daily. In fact you should be begging me for my guidance. But you would beg in vain.
I am here for one purpose. To point out for all to see that TFTT is a pathetic Eight hour a day on the blog Fake.
Oh and TFTT, Did your Google search turn up the name of the English Thinker and author I referenced. Here is your chance to prove me wrong. Step up.
Love in Christ,
Anal-loserga
Fake.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 01:15 PM | Link to this
Nice retort JK. Now you have to resort to quoting bible scriptures? Im sure you want us to all accept YOU and YOUR churches interpretations of Matthew, correct?
You are a true blue, blind liberal JK. Im certain we dont go to the same church.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 01:18 PM | Link to this
If we allow college students to have access to healthcare clinics at the university of their choice, then the terrorists win because one of the main points of Osama Bin Laden is that America is the Great Satan and that fits in with TFTT and Realist’s assertion that american college student’s sexual activity conjurs the devil.
So a great men like TFTT, Realist, and Osama properly condemn American Youth for innappropriate behavior that goes counter to God and is emblematic of a great satan possessed population.
Thus, the victors in todays debate is TTFT, Realist, and OBL.
We are properly chastised, and shall ammend our ways so that we fit in with Osama’s and TTFT’s ideas about how a good country behaves.
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 01:23 PM | Link to this
BTW: Realist and TFTT have accounted for fully 25% of all of today’s comments. You gotta wonder what think tank is missing it’s stars.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 01:26 PM | Link to this
Sura 4: 34 The fantastically holy Koran.
Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the others and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen (parts) because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you you fear disobedience admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take not further action against them. Allah is High, Supreme.
actual literal full quote from the Koran I was given at the Regents park Mosque in LOndon in the early 1980’s.
King James Bible: Timothy 1:2 v 11-12
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man but to be in silence …
v 15
Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing if they contimue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 01:28 PM | Link to this
Now that I’ve vented in my last few posts about hypocrite liberal scum, I’ll get back on topic.
Did I mention that I have fantasies of Hitlary Clinton and flavored condoms?
By Markus
August 17, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this
…and I forgot to mention that while Hitlary and I do our flavored condom thang, Ann Coulter is tickling my rear with her strap-on toy.
By Amelia
August 17, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this
I see where a federal judge just ruled W’s wiretap program unconstitutional.
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 01:31 PM | Link to this
Nope TFTT. It was not the KJV Bible or the Qur’an.
Keep Guessing. If you get it right, and if you are really English like you say you are this should be sooooo easy, I’ll leave you alone FOREVER. Any grade 8 child in the UK would know this.
But then again, if you don’t know then it might just be more proof that you are…….can you guess what comes next………a
Fake.
Love in Jebus,
Anal.
Fake.
By Brian
August 17, 2006 01:31 PM | Link to this
Political foreskin wrote:
Jim Wooten is RIGHT!!! It’s a slippery slope from flavored condoms to edible buttplugs
I wish I had one of those after eating Mexican today.
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 01:32 PM | Link to this
@ CBF(Larry), I’m going to take up for Realist here. I was actually reading through the blogs when that comment was made (about your mother). I remember reading it and thinking “I can’t believe he said that!” I didn’t expect that from him. Then, mystery solved…….Go back and read further down - he was punked by the ID stealer. He responded later that it wasn’t him.
You know we all get punked by that creep, so please take his word that the comment wasn’t his.
I find it interesting that you to go after each other so much considering you have quite a bit in common.
By Activist Judge
August 17, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this
I ruled against it Amelia. I guess I’ll be labled an activist judge on Fox News and Jim “whoopy” Whooten
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 01:35 PM | Link to this
the unhinged liberal foreskin has finally lost it!! terrorism??? - wow that cocktail of experimental drugs has really kicked in now.
NO one, least of all me is saying that college kids must be chaste or any such thing - simply that the tax payer funded GA Tech feminazi is way over the top with the sexually explicit quoted “lwelcome leaflet” or whatever it was.
anal loser has all the intellect and wisdom of a flattened flea ridden rabid possum bit of discarded road kill, but a kosher one of course!!
By Realist
August 17, 2006 01:38 PM | Link to this
Thank you Barbara!! It was pretty obvious to most I didnt say that but many here arent interested in truth or fact.
Not much good going on in here today. The topic lends itself to sexual jokes and childishness, as if we dont get enough of that here with non-sexual topics.
Anyway, glad to see you today!
By Stinky Sullivan
August 17, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this
Um, I’ll take a BJ, please. Sign me up.
SS
By JK
August 17, 2006 01:44 PM | Link to this
Please attend the church of your choosing, or choose not to attend. In America, it’s your choice, not mine to make for you.
By Brian
August 17, 2006 01:45 PM | Link to this
Looks like we have the resident evil ID thief at large in the house again mimicking others who just happen to be conservatives. Somebody sic the pitbulls on this vile cretin and put it out of it’s misery. It’s mother must have died:
http://www.seacoastonline.com/news/special/8_16special4.htm
http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0816-mutant.html
By John Karr, Georgia's Finest
August 17, 2006 01:45 PM | Link to this
Can’t we all get along here? I like little girls, most of you conservative Georgians like little boys, but can’t we all just get along??
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 01:45 PM | Link to this
anal loser has all the intellect and wisdom of a flattened flea ridden rabid possum bit of discarded road kill, but a kosher one of course!!
Can’t you do better than that. Come on. You hit like my sister.
Oh, and I make no claims of wisdom, but I do possess intellect. At least enough to see through you.
And I know the answer to the question you are running away from so fast and hard. (Put that in so I’d fit in with the potty mouth talk today.) Why no answer. Is it because you are a……..
well you know.
Gotta run for a while. Good time for TFTT to pull out the fake Brit-speak and try to impress everyone. Oh and hit me again, I won’t be here so I’ll be like you like your enemies and lovers, unable to fight back.
Jebus loves you TFTT.
Anal.
By Richard
August 17, 2006 01:46 PM | Link to this
Hey Realist - you talk how wonderful and Christian you are (all the time judging others - judge not, lest ye be judged - ever hear of that) like you’re trying to convince yourself. You mention how you taught your children abstinence so they’re virgins. Yeah, you believe that?
I banged your daughter when she got to college and she already knew more than I did!
By White Jesus
August 17, 2006 01:47 PM | Link to this
JK..
That picture looks like Bin Laden..not me…I look like Heath Ledger
By Definition of "Georgia Virgin"
August 17, 2006 01:48 PM | Link to this
A third grader too ugly even for daddy.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 01:49 PM | Link to this
wow jk, I would have figured you to support a poltically correct leftist appeasing “black” or dark skinned jesus. hmmmm.
and by the way, thank you for your permission to go to the church of my chosing. i appreciate you liberals being so kind as to allow me this right.
you my child of god may want to spend some time reading corinthians. then get back to me ok.
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 01:50 PM | Link to this
Jim, I’m with you on the issue of sexual content in the college open house discussions. I don’t want some college employee promoting sex as a “welcome to college” experience. I expect my children to refrain. I’m sure some of them won’t, but I think it’s tacky to say that having lots of sex is part of the college experience. While sex is probably a big part for some, I believe there are many college kids who don’t participate. The approach described in your article seems to be an “in your face” approach. If they want to offer this information, perhaps they should offer a voluntary orientation geared towards the sexual portion of the college experience. Then those who want to discuss it openly, or get the materials could attend without subjecting those who don’t want it thrown in their faces to it.
As for the “free speech”, I’m not really up on that topic but I do think colleges should have a right to expect certain conduct on campus, and that includes limiting racial slurs, obscene words and gestures, or obscene literature from being passed around on campus.
That’s my 2 cents worth….
By Rod
August 17, 2006 01:51 PM | Link to this
Hey Realist, did you fail English 101 in college because you were screwing around the whole time? In your 1:15 comment, you: (1) put Im, instead of I’m (2) put churches instead of church’s (3) again put Im instead of I’m (4) put dont, instead of don’t. I guess you’re not half as smart as you think you are (but about where we know you are).
By Realist
August 17, 2006 01:52 PM | Link to this
Hi Richard, may I call you DICK?
I was speaking hypothetically of course, as I have no daughter.
You seem a bit troubled young man. I think I have the cure. I drink coffee every morning at a certain place, and Id love to share that location with you so that I can hear more of your comments regarding my family and I can witness to you in some way. Im sure I can get you to change your wicked ways some how. Are you up for coffee and a “come to jesus” meeting with me DICK?
By White Jesus
August 17, 2006 01:52 PM | Link to this
There’s nothing PC about a dark skinned Jesus…its just wrong. We all know how I look. It was just a good tan, Realist
By Empty Threats
August 17, 2006 01:56 PM | Link to this
Realist and all others offering up empty threats of physical violence.
I’m sick of all this false bravado and tough talk. So here and now I hereby accept all challenges to physical confrontations. Let me know when and where tough guy and I’ll be there. That goes for Larry and his sons too.
In fact I’ll be at Manuel’s at 7 tonight. Meet me there.
By Rod
August 17, 2006 01:56 PM | Link to this
Hey Realist - do you have something against an apostrophe? You did it again in your 1:52 post. You really do need to go back to college - for English this time, not sex. Id instead of I’d - Im instead of I’m - jesus instead of Jesus.
If you’re going to blog on here all day and take up 20% of the space, at least please learn to type.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 01:56 PM | Link to this
anal loser …
It will be fabulously amusing to still see you doing this puerile compulsive obsessive bollox in five years, even just one year. How long will you keep it up - HINT: if I respond just enough to keep feeding the obsession for you - will that continue to work??
The fact that I have so easily “anchored” on you such an obsession with a total stranger is one of the small pleasures and rewards of winding up lefties and inadequate wankers like yourself on blog. Watching you endlessly ‘innoculate’ your self against virtually any insult/quip/observation is now actually funnier than your beholding your obsession.
By White Jesus
August 17, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this
Black Jesus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Chappellejackson.jpg
By Realist
August 17, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this
I was no english or Arts major of any sort ROD. I actually do type quite fast for a man, but I admit I regularly leave out the ‘s and the ’ in Im because “Im” usually in a hurry and rarely go back and ocrrect it. See what I mean. Sue me, I cant be this handsome AND a perfect typist/writer.
Thanks for reading my comments though. Keep reading. You may learn something.
By Richard
August 17, 2006 01:58 PM | Link to this
Realist - I do think you just threatened me! However, I’m more than willing to meet you (Desert Storm vet). Why don’t you tell everyone here which certain place you visit and what time you’ll be there tomorrow? I’m sure lots of people on here would love to attend.
By Robert
August 17, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this
I see TFTT came on just long enough to type in some more big words he just looked up in the dictionary. We’re so impressed little man!
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this
Richard, we are not supposed to judge but we are supposed to hold people accountable for their actions. Some don’t understand the difference. Some of us interpret the difference to be condemnation to hell. A girl that offers herself to be passed around freely for sexual use is a slut. Period. No one’s condemning her to hell for it, but she is a slut. Jesus himself acknowledged women with this behaviour, but he didn’t condemn them to hell. There’s a difference. To call it like you see it is not being judgemental; it’s being realisitc (no pun intended….)
I have actually said to my own daughters that their attire looked slutty (before I made them go change). I’ve also told one of my daughters that she is too much of a flirt to have a boyfriend. I love them with all my heart, but if they are acting inappropriate, as children (and adults for that matter) will do, then I’m going to call them out on it.
By Renee
August 17, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this
What’s the fascination with the word slut today? If a girl has sex with 5 guys (over a year period) she’s called a slut. However, if a guy has sex with 10 different girls over that same period, he’s called a stud?
Sounds like those crying slut are sexest.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this
Okay Mr. Empty Threats, MY NAME IS Rednecks-America’s Al Qaeda. If I see you tonight I’m going to whip your A** pretty boy.
By Dana
August 17, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this
ouch - did I just accidentally wander into a blog peopled primarily by middle school boys? Come on - I’ve seen you all act more intelligent than this! Well, most of you at least.
There are maybe half a dozen bloggers here today who’ve actually read the topic, the rest of you apparently OD’d on testosterone today.
I take back my comment that this is an interesting topic. Jim, this was not your finest effort, and if today were my first day here I wouldn’t bother to come back.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:05 PM | Link to this
Realist - dont let these twonks get to you. Laughing at and wittily sneering at them is the best and only way to respond. Anyone sad enough to actually seriously post that kind of abuse, and the lefty type homo abuse and the id stealing abuse and on and on needs mercilessly abusing - verbally not physically.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this
Empty Threats: I was just relaying what Rednecks told me!
By clark
August 17, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this
Caught you.
I was waiting around to see if you’d follow your true form, and what do you know I was right. I tell you I’m going and here comes two paragraphs filled with bile and chock full of fake Brit-speak. (Even called me a Wanker. Nice)
As for how long I’ll keep this up. Who knows, I may lose interest on the morrow. But for now I think I’ll just keep going.
Is this an obsession. You never know. But one thing is clear. You are in here every day, all day long, post after post saying the same old thing, for HOURS at a time. Now if you are disabled, bedridden or home bound then you have my apologies. But if not, then I think the obsession is on the other foot.
In others words. Is this really all you have to do in your life? To insult people in this blog? That’s just sad.
Sad, but off the point. The point is that you can’t answer one simple question that would shut me up forever. Who was the English author I quoted.
Watching you run from that little fact is giving me infinite enjoyment.
Well, I have to go. After all, there’s more to life than this little blog. At least for some of us.
In praise of Pan,
Anal
Fake.
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this
Careful now TFTT….. Remember the study posted by Queens of the Mountains earlier today. When people are absessively trashing you it’s because they are secretly attracted to you. Keep an eye out for clarkslawga; they may be stalking you at this very minute. From what I’ve observed, they sure are hung up on you….
And to clarkslawga, I am disappointed in the way you keep going after TFTT. I’ve had some really good debates with you and your posts can be thoughtful. I know you can be courteous too, based on some of the debates you’ve had with me. Why continue to viciously attack someone you don’t even know? Yawn………
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:07 PM | Link to this
I wouldn’t bother to come back
Dana - please dont raise hopes like that only to cruelly dash them!! smirk
By Brian
August 17, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this
This Richard character thinks it’s ok to throw around grotesque innuedoes about the family members of conservatives around here and then when someone offers up a personal meeting to discuss further, it’s considered a ‘threat’. How liberally democratic.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this
wtf is manuels? some bar? so you spend your days on the internet and your nights at manuels thats reeeeeeal nice.
well son, I will be at my 6400sq ft home in my gated community tonight, cooking dinner with my adoring wife and listening to the events of the day from my young son. then I will go downstairs to see how much progress the workers are making on my media room and theater. we are all so excited about it being completed!! then my wife and I will put my son to bed and sit out back on the screened porch with a glass of wine, maybe even sit in the jacuzzi, and listen to the crickets before we go off to bed.
but hey, you have a good time at manuels. and the coffee offer stands anytime.
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 02:09 PM | Link to this
Oh wait, Forgot to ‘innoculate’ myself…
Circle Dot Cootie Shot.
Whew. That was close.
Fake
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 02:10 PM | Link to this
Dear wingnut,
Please stay out of my bedroom, you are not wanted there.
Perverts.
How about that activist judge telling our crazy dictator to stop the warrantless wiretape?
Swift boat starts in five, four, three…….
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 02:12 PM | Link to this
Renee, a girl that has sex with 5 different guys in a year is a slut. A guy that has sex with 5 different girls in a year is certainly not a gentlemen, and no one that I’d want my daughter to bring home. Boys and men are also accountable for being chaste. Unfortunately society has never frowned upon the male’s sexual conquests, but I guarantee that if you ask the folks who oppose sexual promiscuity, they will tell you they feel the same way about both genders. It’s just that the names we’ve come up with for the males are less offensive. Don’t you remember the terms “ally cat” or “player”?
By Iraqi Soldier
August 17, 2006 02:14 PM | Link to this
Hey Realist, get your @ss out of that comfy 6400 sq ft house and give us a hand over here.
Why? Why aren’t you here? I thought you support us……We need you.
By White Jesus
August 17, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this
“player” is a ghetto term.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this
Barbara - not sure if that was you, the execrable id stealer is back … with the same petty jealousies as robert.
Its hilarious watching anal loser do this week after week after week - knowing that my humble posts are hysterically winding this maggot brained jobbie up is too funny.
see - just enough there to feed its obsession!!
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 02:16 PM | Link to this
Oh, and to Jim’s Dumbass Topic, you’re wrong. It’s a shame that you have to attack my innocent daughters in order to make yourself feel good on a blog. Sad. I will say this though. If you have daughters, I hope what you describe does not happen to them and I hope they turn out to be everything you want and expect from them. Sincerely, Barbara
By deegee
August 17, 2006 02:17 PM | Link to this
Al and Peg Bundy have come up in the world.
By James
August 17, 2006 02:18 PM | Link to this
Wow, I leave for a couple of weeks and this is the conversation?
Hello Barbara, Realist, Jim, everybody.
Just stopping by but this topic has went downhill from the beginning it seems.
“Jim’s Dumb A Topic”..what’s your obsession with black athletes and white college girls?
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 02:18 PM | Link to this
TFTT, it really was me. It was meant to be funny - you know, a kind of “turn the liberals’ weblinks around on them” kind of funny. A liberal posted a link about homophobia being linked to underlying homosexual feelings, I was linking that to clarkslawga’s “TFTT phobia” being linked to being attracted to TFTT…..
By Barbara
August 17, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this
Hi James. I wondered where you were…..
Who knows what that “JDAT” is thinking. Oops, I just realized my bad word got through the filter. Sorry Jim. I thought I’d get the asterisk…..
By James
August 17, 2006 02:22 PM | Link to this
@White Jesus
That picture is hilarious..I had to show that to my company partners. I always thought that he would look more like Prince
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 02:22 PM | Link to this
Boy this is a liberals dream topic today! S-E-X!!! Dem boys & girls like sex anytime, anywhere, anyway! But then, I sorta like sex myself.
OH GOD, please don’t tell me I’m a liberal!!!
By Realist
August 17, 2006 02:24 PM | Link to this
Im assuming you meant US Soldier IN Iraq, so I will play along
Dear Iraqi Soldier, I am fighting right along side you son. You see, back home, we are fighting a threat just as real as any IED or RPG that you may face. Its a threat to our way of life as we know it. The threat is the undermining of American patriots and servicemen just like you son, and you wont beleive where the threat is coming from! Its coming from the liberal congress that many of us trusted and beleived in when they voted to send troops into Iraq. Thats right, the very ones who voted to send you in are now backing out on you and abandoning you one after another. So my son, we are here fighting for you. Not to mention working hard at our jobs each day and sending our tax dollars to Washington so that you can have the equipment and food and tools you need to win this war. You are doing a great job son, and we appreciate you and your work for this country. Keep doing your part, and we conservatives will keep doing ours on your behalf!!
Warmly, Realist, true american
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:24 PM | Link to this
Barbara, I seriously think anal loser is a very lonely inadequate homosexual stalker … but so long as it stays out of bullet range of my porch and doesn’t allow one of my Alsatians to use it as a chew toy then I guess its OK. Let it say what ever it wants.
It’s pathetic what these extra chromosomed lefties say about your and Realists’s daughters - just trying to cynically wind you up though.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:25 PM | Link to this
Barbara, I seriously think anal loser is a very lonely inadequate homosexual stalker … but so long as it stays out of bullet range of my porch and doesn’t allow one of my Alsatians to use it as a chew toy then I guess its OK. Let it say what ever it wants.
It’s pathetic what these extra chromosomed lefties say about your and Realists’s daughters - just trying to cynically wind you up though.
By James
August 17, 2006 02:26 PM | Link to this
Barbara,
Work work work, somebody has to over develop metro Atlanta. I’m happy to do it!
Take care all
By Fall Line
August 17, 2006 02:27 PM | Link to this
I seldom if ever agree with anything that Jerry Falwell has to say, but if you send your sons and daughters to Liberty University, you know exactly what to expect. LU is a private university that stands and falls in the marketplace of ideas and economics. It is not being supported by your tax money, and it should not be.
Land grant colleges and public (tax supported) universites have a responsibility to open their doors to anyone who can qualify academically regardless of their political values or sexual proclivities.
Indoctrination into the fine art of preventing sexually transmitted diseases is the sole purview of the informed parent and Cosmopolitan Magazine.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 02:29 PM | Link to this
With that, I say goodnight. Peg and I have to go down to the piggly wiggly and pick up some bologny and white bread.
yall have a good night, now, ya hear?
By Iraqi Soldier
August 17, 2006 02:30 PM | Link to this
Realist, while you are in your jacuzzi, blogging with your wine, I am lucky if I get to wash my face.
Politics can wait, we need you. They just told me I can’t go home again. I need a rest, please we need you. Don’t be afraid.
By Flag-waving Chickenhawks
August 17, 2006 02:33 PM | Link to this
Realist-speak for “I’m a sissy coward”:
Dear Iraqi Soldier, I am fighting right along side you son. You see, back home, we are fighting a threat just as real as any IED or RPG that you may face. Its a threat to our way of life as we know it. The threat is the undermining of American patriots and servicemen just like you son, and you wont beleive where the threat is coming from! Its coming from the liberal congress that many of us trusted and beleived in when they voted to send troops into Iraq. Thats right, the very ones who voted to send you in are now backing out on you and abandoning you one after another. So my son, we are here fighting for you. Not to mention working hard at our jobs each day and sending our tax dollars to Washington so that you can have the equipment and food and tools you need to win this war. You are doing a great job son, and we appreciate you and your work for this country. Keep doing your part, and we conservatives will keep doing ours on your behalf!!
Warmly, Realist, true american
what a long-winded liar
By Flag-waving Chickenhawks
August 17, 2006 02:36 PM | Link to this
Realist-speak for “I’m a sissy coward”:
Dear Iraqi Soldier, I am fighting right along side you son. You see, back home, we are fighting a threat just as real as any IED or RPG that you may face. Its a threat to our way of life as we know it. The threat is the undermining of American patriots and servicemen just like you son, and you wont beleive where the threat is coming from! Its coming from the liberal congress that many of us trusted and beleived in when they voted to send troops into Iraq. Thats right, the very ones who voted to send you in are now backing out on you and abandoning you one after another. So my son, we are here fighting for you. Not to mention working hard at our jobs each day and sending our tax dollars to Washington so that you can have the equipment and food and tools you need to win this war. You are doing a great job son, and we appreciate you and your work for this country. Keep doing your part, and we conservatives will keep doing ours on your behalf!!
Warmly, Realist, true american
what a long-winded liar
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:37 PM | Link to this
By Iraqi Soldier
August 17, 2006 02:30 PM | Link to this
Realist, while you are in your jacuzzi, blogging with your wine, I am lucky if I get to wash my face.
Politics can wait, we need you. They just told me I can’t go home again. I need a rest, please we need you. Don’t be afraid.
By Flag-waving Chickenhawks
August 17, 2006 02:33 PM | Link to this
Realist-speak for “I’m a sissy coward”:the obssesive lefties are getting ever more shrill and more and more personal!!
ITS BLEEDIN’ HILARIOUS THOUGH!!
See how easy it is to reduce them to this!! huge smirk
By lynn t
August 17, 2006 02:38 PM | Link to this
I’ve heard of Manuel’s….I think it’s a gay bar. Anyway on topic, you can walk into any gas station restroom and buy glow in dark, fruity flavored or the condoms with the little moles on top (he he). What’s the big deal?
By Redneck Convert
August 17, 2006 02:39 PM | Link to this
Looks like a fight will be here soon along with the cops. Id like to see TFTT, Realist, and others frog-marched, but I cant take the chance cause Im out on bail.
Anyway, I have one of them pile-on cysts, but it aint on my butt. The doc says some shots will take care of it. Gotta go. Nice topic Wooten. Next time lets talk about cures for the runs or maybe stinky feet.
By sct
August 17, 2006 02:41 PM | Link to this
I get now. Conservatives don’t have to go to war because they are now in a political battle here.
Thats a great strategy on how to win a war!
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this
Hey Wednecks: Are you talking about the “pile-on cyst” on your shoulders? You little pimple-headed POS Athwipe!
Love, UgottaB
By lynn t
August 17, 2006 02:46 PM | Link to this
Realist “not to mention working hard at our jobs all day” hahahahahahahaha….it’s hard work blogging isn’t it? And you are doing your part Mr. American!
By Iraqi Soldier
August 17, 2006 02:46 PM | Link to this
Hey SCT, We don’t need aging older and usually fat bloggers and businessmen to come over here and weight us down. Haven’t you looked at recruiting numbers? We have new young strong soldiers signing up to come here every single day.
Thanks but no thanks. Just keep fighting for us over there and keep those sissy a* cut and run liberals out of office and out of our business over here!!
Roger that. OVer and out!!
By sct
August 17, 2006 02:46 PM | Link to this
Republicans: We’re fighting them here so we don’t have to fight them over there.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 02:49 PM | Link to this
Hey folks, if you don’t want your daughters having sex at college…get ‘em married off before they go! That’ll stop that damn sex.
MEN: You know THE #1 food that kills a woman’s sex drive?
WEDDING CAKE
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 02:49 PM | Link to this
Jim,
Maybe this new paper will print your wingnut opinion
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 02:57 PM | Link to this
Not changing the subject, but I just saw where France is doubling their commitment of troops to the “peace-keeping” effort in Lebanon! That ought to scare the Hell out of the Hezbollahs!
By sct
August 17, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this
Revised Republican lyrics to “Over There”
Over here over here
Sent the word, sent the word over here
That the Conservatives are blogging, the Conservatives are blogging,
The bloggers are typing ev’rywhere
So prepare say a pray’r
Sent the word, sent the word to beware
We’ll not be over, we’re not coming over,
And we won’t go there till it’s over over there!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this
so rednekkks is out on bail …
here’s why!!
http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?setid=1&clickid=123&art_id=qw1155747244653B232
By Brian
August 17, 2006 02:59 PM | Link to this
Who let in all the fake lying loser democrats posing as iraq war veterans to get their hollow ‘chickehawk’ points in here? Or is that just the same idiot that deficates all over this blog hijacking id’s? Why is it always lefties that have to ruin a blog? Hey you democrock, go volunteer to build a habitat for humanity house or sit down and shaaadup already.
By Richard
August 17, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this
Hey Realist - you don’t know what Manuel’s is? And you consider yourself politically savy? You obviously don’t know crap about politics if you don’t know about Manuel’s (a political meeting place - for donkeys and elephants).
By the way, chicken$hit, I notice you still didn’t tell us where you’ll be in the morning. You also scared away from the Manuel’s invite. You’re a big talker (bragging about your giant house confirms you live in a single-wide trailer) but don’t have the balls to back it up. Now, go cry to mommy (or is daddy more your style?).
By Richard
August 17, 2006 03:02 PM | Link to this
Hey Realist - you don’t know what Manuel’s is? And you consider yourself politically savy? You obviously don’t know crap about politics if you don’t know about Manuel’s (a political meeting place - for donkeys and elephants).
By the way, chicken$hit, I notice you still didn’t tell us where you’ll be in the morning. You also scared away from the Manuel’s invite. You’re a big talker (bragging about your giant house confirms you live in a single-wide trailer) but don’t have the balls to back it up. Now, go cry to mommy (or is daddy more your style?).
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this
Hey Brian - if it wasn’t for that pu$$y, no-good republican president, we wouldn’t have so many DEAD Iraqi veterans. We’d have LIVE soldiers! How many more U.S. soldiers must Bush murder before he admits he screwed up?
By Stewart
August 17, 2006 03:07 PM | Link to this
Manuel’s is well known to those that grew up in the area. Realists is from Alabama originally. CAn’t expect him to know every little nook and cranny. Manuel’s is more famous in Atlanta and Dekalb anyway. Once I moved to Alpharetta, Manuel’s never crossed my mind.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this
Hey Rod: Dazzle us with your brilliance there good Buddy! Tell ole Ugotta just exactly how you’d handle that Iraqi thang.
TFTT: Listen up! This ought to be really good coming from a liberal…
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 03:09 PM | Link to this
some of the sad wittle lefties are nearly in tears now … watching them meltdown like this is too freaking funny!!
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 03:09 PM | Link to this
We walked in Manuels Tavern one day drunk and there were a bunch of politicians spewing in there.
Needless to say, they kicked us out.
That place still open?
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 03:11 PM | Link to this
I bloody well hope Manuel is not an illegal immigrant or Basil Fawlty’s old waiter!!
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this
Hey Ugo, explain exactly why we sent 1000’s of U.S. soldiers to die in Iraq? Was it to dig up allllll those weapons of mass destruction?
It’s a fact - Bush F@#$ed up. Now, at least bring home some of the soldiers before they die.
By sct
August 17, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this
I’m with Realist. I would handle Iraq by blogging them to death while sitting in a jacuzzi sipping wine. Good wine too. Expensive wine. Great strategy.
By UGA Dad
August 17, 2006 03:20 PM | Link to this
My daughter is a sophomore at UGA. She is paying for her own school - like a whole lotta UGA girls, she makes her tuition money off her knees, on her back, and hanging off a stripper pole. She already knows this condom stuff - she’s been “saving for college” since I turned her out when she was thirteen.
By CBF
August 17, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this
Realist (and Barbara): If Barbara is correct and the comment I mentioned came from an ID stealer then I offer you an apology. I hate cutting off communication with anyone, even that microbe “redneck”. Barbara: Good intuition there, girlfriend!
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:23 PM | Link to this
Rod, Rod! It wasn’t me that mentioned Iraq! You brought it up about the dead soldiers and we could’ve had live soldiers. Yeah, if we’d sat on our asses and done nothing! BUT you nice liberals seem to have THE answer! But we just can’t any of you to tell us what the answer IS! Just like YOUR candidates. Y’all run your mouths but don’t give us a solution. Right or wrong, we’re in Iraq. I’m not taking about a hypothetical…I’m talking about a REAL situation that’s going on now, not what we SHOULD have or shouldn’t done. I want to know what YOU would do about the PRESENT SITUATION, right now!!!
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 03:24 PM | Link to this
They are cowards, plain and simple. Just say Muslim and they cower and run to mommy.
These democracy killers have no backbone whatsoever. Fake Americans are just pathetic.
By UGA Dad
August 17, 2006 03:26 PM | Link to this
A bunch of wino Alabama-born queers blogging from jacuzzis is a better war strategy than the one we’ve got.
By Stewart
August 17, 2006 03:27 PM | Link to this
Rod
How old are you? Nevertheless some of your buddies F@#$ED up as well.
http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml
If I was a Democrat, I would argue the ineffectiveness of the current Iraqi campaign. However most of the Democrats just regurgitate Howard Dean talking points. So the majority of us Republicans just ignore these rants because we know how silly you look. An inteligent debate on Iraq is warranted, not a bunch of name calling, etc.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:30 PM | Link to this
Wednecks: I thought it was you liberal DemoNcraps that wanted to “cower and run”. At least that’s what I hear from the liberals on here and your DemoNcrap “leaders”. Ask that great Athwipe John Murtha!!! Or John Kerry! Or Algore! Or Hitlery! Or “Goober” Carter! Or “BJ” Clinton! and on and on and on…
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:30 PM | Link to this
Ugo - typical Republican response!!!!
When asked why we went to Iraq, you get off the subject faster than Tammy Faye can put on makeup! You start talking about how we have to support the troops. Yeah, lets support them by saving their lives and bringing them home!!
Again, EXACTLY why did we have to go to IRAQ??
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 03:31 PM | Link to this
that knock at the door UGA dad is the cops and DFCS … pimping your daughter is a criminal offence and needs harsh treatment.
Hope you enjoy the taser!!!
By Michael Weiner Savage
August 17, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this
You strong manly conservative men - don’t sap your strength engaging in sodomy with these she-devils - if you must engage in sex, be a man - have sex only with each other! Or me!
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:36 PM | Link to this
ROD: What’s wrong? Since you DemoNcraps know how to handle the Iraqi situation bettern anyone I know, I just knew you would give me an answer as to what to do NOW. I’m sure our boys would like to come home, BUT I don’t think they actually want to do the DemoNcrap “cut and run”!
By Truth speaks
August 17, 2006 03:36 PM | Link to this
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is simple.
Democrats are the average American. Middle and Lower class financially. The U.S. military is made up primarily (over 90%) of this group.
Republicans are generally richer and know there’s an easy way to get rid of Democrats: start needless wars and send soldiers to die for no reason. Start a war, send a soldier (Democrat) to die and you can turn the country into all Republicans (because all the Democrats will be dead).
Bush is using this strategy and needs to kill off a few more soldiers before he calls back the military.
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this
Manuel’s is one of the only true corner taverns in Atlanta. It was opened by a guy named Manuel who was a Lebanese immigrant and served as the Dekalb County CEO.
However, many folks on here may not like it as it’s the traditional hangout of state Democrat politicians. But if some of you conservatives don’t mind seeing pictures of Carter, Clinton, and Kennedy hanging on the walls, a cold beer is a cold beer.
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this
Hey UGA DAD - your 3:20 post was pretty funny, until you mentioned having sex with your 13 year old daughter. Pedophilia, rape and child molestation isn’t funny. You’re sick for even making that comment and I hope Jim blocks you forever.
By UGA Dad
August 17, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this
Oh come on time, do you think the cops here actually prosecute prostitution? Why do you think Atlanta is such a popular convention destination - the museums? - the attractions?? the restaurants???
Georgians have been pimping their wives and daughters since the days of Oglethorpe.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:39 PM | Link to this
Damn, Truth speaks, you’ve figured it out!!! I guess that’s why 75-80% or more of the military (I forgot the exact numbers) voted Republican for Bush over John Kerry. They were actually DemoNcraps that voted Republican! Duh-huh!
By sct
August 17, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this
Its the Republicans that are in the position of leadership. Deflecting the blame because of your failures is cowardly. Start leading!
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this
TFTT,
There is no waiter from Barcelona.
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this
Hey Ugo, stillllllll waiting!! EXACTLY why did we have to go to Iraq, causing thousands of U.S. soldiers to die?
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:42 PM | Link to this
Hey Rod: That’s just the pimp-A** Wednecks trying to be “cute”! But he comes off again looking like an Athwipe!
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:42 PM | Link to this
Hey Ugo, caught you making up a statistic. That’s a fake one about the “Bush voting military” - in other words, a lie.
Still waiting, exactly why did we go to Iraq?
By George B.
August 17, 2006 03:44 PM | Link to this
Why does Ugotta seem to be spinning in his tracks? Just answer the question dude. Why?
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 03:45 PM | Link to this
Rod: Are you just going to argue meaningless positions OR are you going to tell me what you’re going to do about the current situation in Iraq. I know we’re there. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out nor do I have to tell you why we’re there…WE’RE THERE! Now tell me what YOU’RE going to do! And stop avoiding the REAL question!
By UGA Dad
August 17, 2006 03:45 PM | Link to this
Rod, obviously you’re not from around here, or you’d know that native Georgians have a penchant for and history of child abuse, including incest. It is too often an important part of what passes for southern family life, unfortunately.
Read your Faulkner, your Dickey, Conroy, etc. - is there a single decent southern writer that doesn’t write about the sexual depravity of the southerner??
Hey, she’s just paying the bills…
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 03:46 PM | Link to this
Liberal … there was in Fawlty Towers … but it was an actor, Andrew Sachs if memory serves, pretending to be from Barcelona. Sort of the model for Baldrick.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 03:49 PM | Link to this
UGA dad needs reporting to the feds and lcoal plod for child abuse and pimping kids etc … or is it just a sicko making sick jokes … REDNEKKKS VERMIN … THAT YOU AGAIN??!!
By sct
August 17, 2006 03:49 PM | Link to this
“in the last throes,”, mission accomplished, WMD lies, democracy lies, 6 weeks 6 months at the latest, paid for by oil, we have enough soldiers, Rummy’s doing great, greeted with flowers.
This is not good leadership! Not even close.
By Rod
August 17, 2006 03:49 PM | Link to this
Ugo, again a typical Republican. If you don’t want to say why we’re there, then at least admit Bush screwed up by attacking Iraq!
UGA Dad, you’re actually defending molesting and raping your 13 year old daughter?!?!?! You’re so sick it’s pathetic.
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 03:51 PM | Link to this
TFTT,
I know. The previos post was in reference to that. It was one of the funnier UK sitcoms until Ricky Gervais’s “The Office”.
By Realist
August 17, 2006 03:51 PM | Link to this
Haha, even I gotta admit, he’s got Ugotta on the run!
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this
Anyone else notice how TFTT stops posting at the same time five times a day? While I admire his religious discipline, one has to be suspicious of him especially when coupled with the fact that his opinion of American Freedom is identical with Osama Bin Laden’s.
Because nothing is at it seems, I’m thinking we may have a bored Al Queda operative trapped indoors in a terror cell. Why? because if you look at the content of TFTT’s posts at face value, you would have to deduce that he’s from the AL KA KA GAY MEN’S CHOIR.
Now get this: if you change just one letter, you get, Al Queda Pays Men 2Die. Now I spend alot of time decyphering code as a hobby, and also, I narrate military end game scenarios for a defense corp. think tank. I’m always playing mind games like, “What if, What would it take… How many men….”
TFTT’s posts have an easily identifiable pattern that emulates variations of the “death to america” chanting which betrays a terrorist philosophy behind the dullard syntactical choices.
I think a call to Homeland Security is in order here.
TFTT: Checkmate, fool.
By Brian
August 17, 2006 03:54 PM | Link to this
Watch out! aRod the aHole is about to burst a blood vessel on this blog. Probably one of those pot-smoking skinny punks in high school that always got beat up by the jarheads and jocks and never got any of what this blog started out on. Maybe Wooten one day will agree for us all meet each other with our REAL NAMES in a round table downtown or something to see if people like Rod will continue mouthing off and insulting family members of conservatives in person instead of behind an anonymous blog. I’d be up for it.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 03:56 PM | Link to this
the lefties have NO idea what to do in Iraq - the treasonous idiotic wanker Kucinich (sp) humiliated itself on O’Reilly a few nights ago - utterly clueless drivel - parrotting “lets use the UN” … and run away as soon aspossible completely ignoiring the vaccum in the region and gifting the Iranians much of Iraq.
THe way to deal with Iran is wait until the next leadership/mullah hate jews/the west fest is in full swing in Tehran or wherever and then drop everything the USAF has handy on them. At least six daisy cutters etc. Removing the entire leadership suddenly and instantly will give the Iranians a chance to pick a govt that’s not going to kill them and everyone else in the region.
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 03:57 PM | Link to this
SCT,
You left out that we would be “greeted as liberators.” However instead of throwing confetti and tickertape it has been IEDs and car bombs.
Rumsfeld and Co. have been doing great in setting a firm timetable and maintaining an effective number of troops in order to secure the country…LOL.
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 03:58 PM | Link to this
“The estranged wife of Randy “Duke” Cunningham says that, on the night before he was sentenced on corruption charges, the disgraced Republican congressman tried to save some of his illegal loot by dumping a duffel bag in her driveway. Inside: dirty underwear and $32,000 in cash.”
He was trying to get his wife to do his dirty laundry.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this
ROD: I think I’ll wait until things are finished before I make that final decision. I’m not pushing for our troops to “cut and run”. I’ve sent 2 sons over there. More importantly than your question of what I think, what do THEY think? THEY were there, I OR YOU are not! We only hear what the liberal news media wants us to hear. I heard from my sons and soldiers on the news that the media is NOT telling us the truth about what’s going on over there. Now is it rosy over there, NO! Is it AS BAD as what those morons in the leftist media would have you and I think, NO! BUT the difference is, that I would rather base MY opinion on what the troops say…NOT what these chickenst so-called “journalists” have to say. Of course you have your opinion and I certainly have mine, and you know as well as I that opinions are like Aholes! We all have one and they all stink!
So now there you go big boy. I’m still waiting on my answer on YOUR plan for Iraq!
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this
TFTT: Traitor Fascist Taliban Turd. (and idiot)
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this
unhinged foreskin has sullenly awoken from its chemically induced slumber again … clearly the need to circumcise it with a STIHL chainsaw is growing stronger every day!!
the more the leftist scum attack you the better job you’re doing in winding the vermin up!! tee hee
By sct
August 17, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this
Sorry Liberal, I forgot that one, who needs leadership anyway? I mean Kucinich was on O’Reilly!!! Oh the humanity.
While Kucinic was on O’Reilly 100 Iraqi’s died.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:04 PM | Link to this
ooooooooooooooHHHHHHHH!!! snigger smirk snigger
unhinged foreskin has had two deranged hissy fits in a row, a short one and a long one !!
By Liberal
August 17, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this
and you know as well as I that opinions are like Aholes! We all have one and they all stink!
LOL. I’m going to steal that from you Ugotta…and I thought that it was the enchiladas that I ate last night.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this
TFTT: I know, they’re such sissy idiots. They all listen to Howard Dean and the other sissies every morning to see what to say each day. It’s great fun winding them up…watching them scratch their watch and winding their A$$, they’re so confused!!!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:07 PM | Link to this
the sad twonk sct utterly ignores the point that this big eared wanker kucinich offered NO plan what ever to deal with the murderous terrorists in Iraq, the Iranians and the wider war on fascist mohammedans. just more empty leftist platitudes and shrill Bush bashing!!
By Cybertuff
August 17, 2006 04:08 PM | Link to this
Brian, it’s too bad this is an anonymous blog. The good thing though, is that a lot of whores’ sons haven’t had their empty heads bashed in trying to defend their mothers’ dubious honor.
It’s been my experience that people that spend so much time worrying about insults to their honor don’t have much anyway.
I bet that shoe fits you nicely, trash.
By sct
August 17, 2006 04:12 PM | Link to this
“TFTT: I know, they’re such sissy idiots.”
no, the “sitting in the jacuzzi, sipping wine Republican war bloggers” are the sissies.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:12 PM | Link to this
I do understand Liberal. I had a taco salad four luuuuunch.
By Brian plays picolo?
August 17, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this
Hey Brian,
Someone calls your mother a whore, and you beat the crap out of them. Your mother’s still a whore though. Damn.
All that fighting for nothing. Now your mother’s a whore and you’re in a jail cell. Damn.
The saga of southern family life continues…
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:14 PM | Link to this
come on unhinged foreskin … surely you can vent even more bile and arrogantly hector and abuse me even more … dont stop there matey - I was really enjoying your heartfelt sneers, you know you truly truly hate me and despise every thing I ever say on here and you have just got to endlessly tell everyone that - RIGHT!!
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this
“Cybertuff”: It’s not nice to talk about Cindy Sheehan like that!!!
By tftt feel the love
August 17, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this
tftt, you’re not all that loveable - I’ll wager you have a perfect face for blogging.
By Dusty
August 17, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this
Rod,
Could you tell me exactly why you ask the very same questions EVERY single day?
Exactly why did we have to go to Iraq?
Do you have a touch of Alzheimers that makes you forget that you asked that yesterday, the day before and got ANSWERS every time which you ignored and asked the SAME QUESTION AGAIN?
We know the decision that the President and the Congress made to go to war. We know that you don’t like it. We know you want to cut and run. We know you want an excuse for the cowardly way out.
But we will not give it to you. Sorry. You will have to run off while the rest of us persevere. So long.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:18 PM | Link to this
OOOooooh Roddddd! I’m still waiting for my answer honey! I haven’t forgotten.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:18 PM | Link to this
come on you twonk sct … tell us YOUR plan for Iraq -apart from running away and leaving Iran with around double the oil reserves etc.
you can sneer but you cant ACTUALLY SAY ANYTHING!!!
My (partial) plan (see above) for Iran is superbly thought out and is very simple for even leftist guttersnipes to understand!!
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this
Ah Dusty, you beautiful babe! I’m high-fivin’ ya! You’re RIGHT ON with your answer to Rod. That’s ALL they know to say.
Ole Rod must not be able to get the head sissy Howard on the phone to get an answer for you. I guess we’ll just have to wait.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:24 PM | Link to this
rod’s just another gutless chickenhawk - cant actually answer - just sneers like the rest of the lefties!!
By Brian
August 17, 2006 04:27 PM | Link to this
How many id’s does this conservative family-trashing troll use? hey clown, you can come over and bang my sister for all I care. What’s said behind a blog means nothing to me. What’s said in person is a whole ‘nuther matter. I’m still for Wooten to offer up a round table meeting of all of us in the real world. After all, who’s going to be bashing in heads in public? I just want to see how manly and mouthy people are in public as they are behind a blog. That’s no threat whatsoever, unless you make it one in your own sick twisted leftist mind. But hey, you losers can always trow pies in faces and run like hell.
By "Al Qaeda type voter"
August 17, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this
Did anybody just see Jack Cafferty’s rant on the idiot dictator breaking the law?
Just beautiful.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this
**when you get these poor wittle plonkers actually using your id in their id’s you know YOU’VE BEATEN THEM!!!
that’s all they’ve got left!!**
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this
Hey Brian: It’s not your SISTER that he’s interested in…BUT you’d better hide your brothers when he comes over!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this
still waiting rod and sct … where’s your plan for Iraq!!
By lynn t
August 17, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this
Hell, i’ll pay for all the beers just to get all of you at one table :) Would make for an interesting night don’t ya think?
By sct
August 17, 2006 04:32 PM | Link to this
tftt, forget it, you Republicans broke it. You are the ones in power. This is your mess, fix it. If you need to ask you probably have clueless leaders.
Imagine at this point, all you have is “we broke it and they won’t tell us how to fix it” as your main whine, pathetic. Brent Scowcroft warned you all this would happen.
Lets see if your ideology can bail you out of this one.
By tftt the Mountain Queen
August 17, 2006 04:32 PM | Link to this
LOL!
Beat this, you silly cybertuff wanker.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:32 PM | Link to this
I’m sorry…correction…that should’ve said “when IT comes over!”
By Dana
August 17, 2006 04:34 PM | Link to this
I’d buy round two…
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this
Hey lynnt: I’m widju! I might kick in a little myself on beer.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:38 PM | Link to this
Hello Dana! You lovely lady!
Have you heard anything from Rod about the Iraqi thang?
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:38 PM | Link to this
tftt, forget it, you Republicans broke it. You are the ones in power. This is your mess, fix it. If you need to ask you probably have clueless leaders
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSEEEEEEEEEERRRRRR!!!
I actually dont need to ask mate - I was merely asking to see if YOU or other lefties have anything to offer strategically other than abuse!!
The demoncrats/left sceech all day long about Iraq … sneer at Bush et al and yet as the supposed political opposition are CLUELESS. If they cant even come up with something even vaguely credible on a blog - what right do they have to ever run this country again!!
By Brian
August 17, 2006 04:41 PM | Link to this
Good one Ugotta! I’ll bet he does like the boys, I’ll bet he liked them in high school too. he’s probably about 130 pounds, pasty white, long unkept hair, wears baggy clothes, drives an ’80s Honda accord with some bondo on one of the four quarter panels, spends his evenings on smut since he can’t get any in the real world, can’t hold a job for more than a few weeks, can’t get a job that pays more than minimum wage, and lives in the basement of his parent’s home in a lower-middle class neighboorhood close to the city limits. Just a hunch.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this
And Brian: You’re being nice, BUT that’s just the kind of guys we are!
By little bri bri
August 17, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this
you silly little whiner - your post lists 15 hunches you have about me - NOT A SINGLE ONE was even close.
Alas, your psychic abilities match your intellect…
By sct
August 17, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this
The fact is I don’t owe you one bit of an explaination.
The fact is the Republican Administration DOES owe the country an explaination on why things turned out so WRONG from what they said.
Lets hear the Administration speak up and explain “in the last throes,”, mission accomplished, WMD lies, democracy lies, 6 weeks 6 months at the latest, paid for by oil, we have enough soldiers, Rummy’s doing great, greeted with flowers AND as liberators.
They are the ones that owe us the explaination.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this
Kidding - I got my answer smirk from sct … looks like Rod chickened out completely - at least sct admitted he was utterly clueless, all that bleating and sneering and they have no idea … isn’t it just a case of I TOLD YOU SO!!
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this
TFTT,
You got me. I am indeed a very lonely inadequate homosexual stalker.
How could you possibly know.
Strange, though. All you had to do was identify one English author to prove once and for all that this Brit thing was not fake…and hours later nothing. I even offered to never bother you again EVER if you answered, but I suspeect you don’t know. Why? I’ll give you a hint, rhymes with rake.
And all you can do is bring out the tired old republican dart of calling me a f*. Well, if you want me to be your f* then I will be happy to oblige. Odd that you would want that though. I suppose it follows though since you insist on continually refering to my anus.
OK. Gotta run. CDCS (Circle dot… just incoculating myself. Don’t want to catch anything from you.)
Jeebus loves you,
Anal
Fake
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this
little bri bri: Duh-huh! I googled “little bri bri” and it said, AND I QUOTE, “Wednecks-Amewica’s Athwipe”!!!
By Gitmobound
August 17, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this
Looks like the resident idiot “lies” has lost it again.
Tighten up mate. Your yellow streak is blinding the folks trying to read this blog.
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 04:55 PM | Link to this
“You got me. I am indeed a very lonely inadequate homosexual”
the power of robotic manipulation!!
see how easy it folks!!
By Dana
August 17, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this
Hi UBK, been missing you today. I’m not getting in the middle of you and Rod!!!
tftt, if you were capable of intelligent speech I might want to respond, however, I admit I have gotten a few laughs from your witless blather.
Finding the best solution and bringing home as many soldiers as possible, while maintaining some semblance of peace and safety, both in the middle east and Iraq should be the goal. Unfortunately here all we have is gutless mudslinging and rhetoric. I can’t give you an answer because I am aware that however much I know about what is going on, there is MUCH more that I don’t.
Oh and UBK, I hope your boys stay safe, wherever they are and wherever they go. I (godless moderate democrat that I am) will keep them in my prayers.
By Brian
August 17, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this
So my hunches were off, oh great multiple id’d one. I just described your average young knowitall leftie, that’s all. So the shoe didn’t fit for you. But it fits on a hell of a lot of smelly crusty leftie lib feet elswhere. Ask them some questions:
Do you dislike Bush?:
‘Uh, yeah I hate Bush. Uh, yeah Bush sucks.’
Who’s the Secretary of State?
‘Uh, I don’t know.’
Would you vote for Hillary for president? If so, why?
‘Uh, yeah. She cares about the poor and the world and stuff.’
Some real bright young and upcoming democrats out there, that’s for sure.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 04:59 PM | Link to this
sct: If I were you I’d put some of the blame also on your sissy leaders in the DemoNcrap party that also, at the time, voted to go to war AND agreed with all the intelligence. ONLY WHEN THINGS WENT BAD did they “cut and run”, ducking and hiding from their earlier decisions. Of course that’s long been forgotten by you morons and your short selective memories. You can’t remember past your PURE DAMN HATRED for George W Bush. I don’t like the b’stard but I don’t hate him like you folks. So when you and Rod and the “boys” remember the REAL, BY GOD, TRUTH, look me up, okay?
By Dana
August 17, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this
I meant HERE not in the ME and Iraq - I’m way to tired to be bothering with this today.
By Michael Silly Savage
August 17, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this
Flavored condoms? My buddy Rush and I would like to order some - is “Little Boys” Butt” a flavor you can buy?
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this
Thank you Dana. They’re both home now BUT I really appreciate your kind words!
By Rod
August 17, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this
Ugo and Dusty - still WAITING!! And yes, I have asked the question many times. Do you know why? Because none of the republicans wants to answer. You try and shift the topic and change things around.
BOTTOM LINE - Bush screwed up by attacking Iraq and his actions killed thousands of U.S. soldiers. He said we attacked to get rid of the weapons of mass destruction - which don’t exist. In other words, we bullied the rest of the world around and attacked a country for no good reason. Until the cowardly republicans admit their God Bush screwed up, I’ll keep asking. Hell, they don’t even have the balls to make up an answer!!
Republicans screwed up by attacking Iraq and whenever anyone asks why, they instantly state the corporate line: “What is your plan to get out of Iraq?” Gets old. You have no clue why you went there and you have no clue how to get out. Dumba$$es.
By Dusty
August 17, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this
Hey, U Gotta,
I think Rod has heard from head honcho Dean.
Rumor has him saying,”Forget it, Rod. We’ve got the journalists all primed to black ball Iraq just before election time. You’re jumping the gun. Shut up!”
Also Ugotta, thanks for the kind words. I promote you to Chief pilot for Bare Air and Liberty Lines.
By Rod
August 17, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this
TFTT - do you have an answer for why Bush murdered all the U.S. Soldiers? Why did he attack Iraq? Yeah, yeah, yeah, spout the corporate line (gutless wuss).
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this
ROD: I suggest you go back and read my 4:59pm post. Maybe it will clear up your “selective” memory a little bit. It wasn’t ONLY Bush that went to war with Iraq. One of the MISTAKES that HE made was thinking the DemoNcraps were behind him when he did. You can’t trust traitorous cowards! It’s like a fight in a bar. Your “buddy” is right beside you—-UNTIL THE FIGHT STARTS!!! Then you can’t find his A. That pretty well sums up the “Bush mistake”. So peddle your S* someplace else where there’s idiots to believe you! Your crap is stinking it up over here!
By Dana
August 17, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this
Rod, tftt is a waste of your time. He/she never says anything original, just regurgitates nasty little comments. Don’t waste your time, and engaging just encourages him/her
By Rod
August 17, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this
Ah Dusty, I see you’re still here. Do you have any more balls than your buddies? Why don’t you answer the question republicans are scared $hitle$$ over?
Why did BUSH attack Iraq and murder thousands of U.S. soldiers? Got balls? Answer it then.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this
Dusty: ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT!!!
By sct
August 17, 2006 05:11 PM | Link to this
The truth Ugotta?…..“in the last throes,”, mission accomplished, WMD lies, democracy lies, 6 weeks 6 months at the latest, paid for by oil, we have enough soldiers, Rummy’s doing great, greeted with flowers,
Please tell me what the truth is. And where exactly does the buck stop now?
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this
sct: I refer you to my 5:08pm post!!!
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this
Gutless Rod still cant answer the simply earlier question from Kidding… and sct’s final response was utterly pathetic - the political opposition HAS to have a plan … otherwise they cant really be elected because no one knows what they will do - or atleast try and do. though that’s the corrupt to the core HiTllary’s plan to try and get elected in 08- have no substantive plan for anything really - just peddle the usual typical klinton lies and hope the leftist media dont actually make her actually say anything of substance in fron of a camera..
By poor little tftt
August 17, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this
the old mountain queen, here all day, her lameass repetitve posts cry “attention me! attention me!”
Will somebody please feed it it’s bottle and change her diapers?
By time for the truth
August 17, 2006 05:16 PM | Link to this
the sad cow dana doesn’t even understand what hypocrisy means - I had to explain it several times this morning!!
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this
Rod and sct: I’m leaving now. You’ve really bored me with your usual 3rd grade “little girl” ranting and raving about that “mean, terrible” George W Bush. I suggest that tonight you both GROW SOME BALLS or send the BIG BOYS to discuss this Iraq issue with me tomorrow! I’m really, really bored with your continuous idiotic denials and accusations. Until next time…
By sct
August 17, 2006 05:21 PM | Link to this
Hey Ugotta, your buddy is not in a bar he’s in a jacuzzi sipping wine blogging about the war.
And I do hold the democratic leaders responsible for this debacle as do some in Conn.
Congress oking the war still does not answer the question of the way the Commander in Chief has executed the war. You want no one to be held accountable, I do.
By sct
August 17, 2006 05:25 PM | Link to this
Ugotta, I guess your going to hit the jacuzzi with your buddy realist, what kind of wine are you bringing?
By ugotta be a realist
August 17, 2006 05:27 PM | Link to this
ugotta’s headed over to realist’s - they’re both gonna be bobbing for apples in the jacuzzi tonite! tftt would join them but it’s ladies only, and they’re just not sure about her.
By Ugotta B. Kidding
August 17, 2006 05:27 PM | Link to this
sct: I’m gonna hang around just long enough to answer your 5:21 question.
No Hell you don’t hold the DemoNcraps responsible. If you did, you’d be p** with all the “so-called” leaders of the DemoNcrap Party that have distanced themselves from the Iraqi war, AFTER VOTING FOR THE WAR, it’s not even funny! They’re exactly like the “friend” in the bar, they voted FOR the war THEN RAN LIKE HELL WHEN IT DIDN’T GO AS PLANNED, like the gutless coward traitors they are.
I think THEY ALL should be held accountable for any misdeeds in Iraq…DemoNcraps AND Republicans!!! Not just the party I don’t particularly like or agree with, as you “boys” do!
Good night and sweet dreams!
By Markus
August 17, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this
Woah! Who led this blog train wreck today! Multiple ID thiefs, like mine done at 1:28 and 1:30 specifically (when I’m off the blog). The dumb@ss ID stealer forgot that as well has how I spell “Hitlary” which I really spell Hitllary. But what do you expect from a jackass limpnoodled liberal not even sharp enough to sweat the details?
Then we had some loud-mouthed limpwrist loonbat lib get his pretty pinko panties in a wad after spitting hate venom about people’s families here. Then someone called him out on it, and he took it as a physical threat. Boy, you ladies on the left are touchy, aren’tcha? You buttpirates can dish it out, but you can’t take it.
Finally we had the usual “why don’t you go join the war chickenhawk” bullsnot from the loony left. Hey, someone who posted about building habitat homes gave me a new name for neolibs who shout from the mountaintops on what to do for people in this nation: “chickenoodles!”
Hey chickenoodle liberals, why don’t you get off your high jackass and volunteer YOUR time and money to feed the poor, shelter the homeless, and other causes that you mental midgets believe in so much. Otherwise, sit down and SHUT UP about the Iraq war and not serving.
But leave it to the loonbat freakshow left to drag a forum down to the gutter of sexuality and other low-life formulations of alleged ideas that dwell in the dimentia of the liberal mind. Great stuff!
By Officer Mancuso
August 17, 2006 05:42 PM | Link to this
68.9 percent engaged in oral sex, you say? Let’s see, rounded up that’d be, uh, …
By sct
August 17, 2006 05:47 PM | Link to this
Ok Markus, I’ll be a good liberal - Republican style.
Tonight I’ll get a glass of wine, grab the check book, hop in the jacuzzi and write out a check to Habitat for Humanity for $1.00, then blog about it for 8 hrs.. Bragging about the true sacrifice I gave up while giving.
By Moron markus
August 17, 2006 05:49 PM | Link to this
Who let the silly whore chickenhawk dingleberry out of his straightjacket?
By clarkslawga
August 17, 2006 05:49 PM | Link to this
“You got me. I am indeed a very lonely inadequate homosexual”
the power of robotic manipulation!!
see how easy it folks!!
The power of not making a damn bit of sense and being totally devoid of any original thought.
See how easy it is folks.
Fake.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 05:51 PM | Link to this
Apparently a loonbat named Rod thinks that Bush lied. Well, another ignoramus needs a memory refresher I need on lies and WMDs. Both of these clows were presidential candidates. Did they lie too? Speak up or shut up Rod:
“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…” - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
http://web.archive.org/web/20040204225854/www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc20030123.html
“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/transcripts/gore_text092302.html
By Trung
August 17, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this
All of this contention over the advocacy of safe sex is at worst, bringing the issue to light, which is a good thing. Most parents never even address the issue, especially conservative ones like mine. I wonder how many parents actually know much if anything about contraception and safe sex. I’ve discussed topics of safe sex and conteception with some of my female co-workers, all of which have children and are in their late 20’s to mid 30’s. I was suprised to discover that most of them had little knowledge of safe sex with the exception of using a condom. (this is coming from persons living in Miami, FL where all the liberals live, which makes me wonder what many conservatives know about safe sex)
I do not have any children, but I’m sure most if not all parents would like their children to learn about sex from an prefessional educator such as Ms. Cohen, instead of learning it from watching MTV. Many people would agree that promoting safe sex education is a good thing, so what is wrong about educating young adults about all the facets of safe sex, which includes the use of flavored condoms. I’m sure every parent would rather have their child learn about flavored condoms from the sexual health department at the university than having their child come in to that very same depratment and asking what to do now that they have contracted a sexually transmitted infection. Many schools do not even have a sexual health department and the UGA students and parents should feel fortunate that the university considers their personal and sexual health as important as their education.
By Markus Silly Savage
August 17, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this
Cybertuffguy, but gay as hell.
By UGA Dad
August 17, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this
Look around at the women of Georgia. Lowlife, low class tramps, most of whom have been sexually active since grade school. Georgia always is a frontrunner in STDs, teen pregnancy, single motherhood. This Cohen woman knows the kind of lowlifes she’s dealing with. Good for her, I say.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this
Back to the topic of this blog originally, morality is the thread to the fabric of a nation. I think my comment at 11:20am and some college class offerings speaks volumes why our nation continues to degenerate into something like Sodom and Gamorrah. After all, according to liberals and the ACLU, it’s more important to not offend anyone than to stop something like NAMBLA. They have rights too dontcha know.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 05:59 PM | Link to this
Hey UGA dad-
You have no basis for generalizing Georgia women. It’s more regional within a region. Alpharetta wealthy girls are much cleaner than inner city ho’s.
Oh, and UGA is made up of nothing but a bunch of drunk rednecks. We Tech grads are always your bosses.
By Markus
August 17, 2006 06:01 PM | Link to this
Hey sct-
I’m not the one that spent all day trolling, jackass loser. I made money to pay for your neocommie socialist causes. LOSER.
By Dusty
August 17, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this
Rod,
I could get down in the gutter with you and answer your stupidity but I won’t. Besides, I don’t do sign language and you seem to be deaf and blind.
You don’t want answers. You simply want to repeat false information thinking someone will believe you. We don’t. Accept it. I, for one, will not be your be a party to your lying litany. No more replies to any more of your sorry laments and accusations.
By lynn t
August 17, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this
Forget the beer…I’ll buy shots to get all of you at one table!
By Political Foreskin
August 17, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this
The issue here is not whether we should flavor a few condoms, or wear edible panties…. cause we should. (wink).
No, the issue here is whether we can we hold an entire University responsible for the actions of a few girls-gone-wild stunt doubles….for if we do, then shouldn’t we blame it on the Bossanova? and if the Bossanova is guilty, then isn’t that an indictment of music and booze in general? Well, you can withhold healthcare for postpubescent nymphs if you want, but I’m not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth Yanni!!!!!
By Higher Education
August 18, 2006 03:35 PM | Link to this
After reading many of these comments, I’m reminded of why the South continues to be the laughing stock of the U.S. Your ignorance of the sexual world today exposes your true level of intelligence, while your comments betray your mental capacities. I’m sickened by the stupidity of such a region.
By UGA Student
August 18, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this
Wow. I have never seen someone make such a big deal (wrongfully) out of one ill-advised word (“recommended”). I am a student at the University of Georgia, and having attended several of Michelle Cohen’s (a.k.a., “liberal hairy armpit feminazi” [sic]) sexual health promotion programs, I can say with factual surety that Michelle would be the last person to push risky, or any, sexual behaviors on anyone. Michelle may use wit and humor to keep students engaged and informed, but that does not in any way imply that she “forces” students to have sex. On the contrary, Michelle will be the first to tell you that abstinence is the only way to insure that sexual behaviors will not end in STI transmission or pregnancy.
She will also tell you, though, that if one makes the decision to engage in sexual behaviors (only after long, serious thought to insure that doing so will not conflict with one’s personal, religious, and ethical beliefs, or the law), one should do so in a way that will minimize the risks inherent in sexual activity. The statistically best way (after abstinence) to prevent STI transmission is to use a barrier during sex, such as a condom or dental dam. Michelle relates factual, scientific data, such as this, to help students make an informed decision. This factual data, and Michelle, strongly promote abstinence as the best way to insure that no negative consequences will result from sexual behavior, but Michelle also includes other information for those who do choose to engage in sexual activities.
The service Michelle provides to the community is indispensable, and the programs she gives are voluntary. No one is forced to read her (occasional) articles in the newspaper, or to attend her programs across campus. And yet, students continue to beg for information, and the attendance at her events is staggering. Why is this? Because the same parents who in the above comments promote the secrecy and shame surrounding all sexual acts, (even when between monogamous, married, heterosexual couples) deny their offspring access to this information, or are in fact ignorant of it themselves. Instead of protecting their children from the evils of sex, they are, in reality, making it more likely that they will engage in risky behavior. Those students on campus whose religious tenants promote abstinence before marriage sometimes (more often than any would like to think) engage in non-v**** penetrative sex (oral or anal sex) so that they can continue to claim the title of “virgin.” I don’t know about you, but if it has SEX in the title (oral SEX, anal SEX,) I consider it to be sex. Many of these students, though, have never had a serious discussion about sex with anyone, including their parents. Telling a person “sex is bad,” is not enough.
When Michelle talks about abstinence, she makes sure to tell students that “abstinence,” means not engaging in oral sex, anal sex, v**** penetrative sex, or any other form of bare genital touching. Quite frankly, I think that in this regard, she would be a much better role model than the “concerned parents” who are so outraged by the gall of this maverick school administrator. Before you attack Michelle, maybe you should have a real discussion about sex with your child (who is, as someone above pointed out so aptly, an ADULT now). Do you know everything there is to know about sexual health? No? Well, then maybe you should encourage your child to take advantage of Michelle’s expertise in the area. Not only does it help your peace of mind, knowing your adult student can make an informed decision, it helps your student stay safe and healthy as well. Isn’t that what every parent wants?
By Olga
August 21, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this
Michelle is a wonderful representative of the UHC Sexual Health department, and the fact that she can come out that openly and say to all the students that she has resources and help available says a lot - it says that the university is open and helpful with students in making sexual choices, as well as giving them resources if they need someone to ask a question and are just too shy. Michelle breaks the ice and makes the topic approachable, rather than isolated, so that more students can get more help that they may need and deserve.