Mike Luckovich

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 8:04 AM | Link to this

Hey, cartoon boy drew his first “global warming” hysteritic.

Is it a self portrait?

~~~~~

Typical whiny liberal only the surrender monkeys can admire:

{{{{Australian leader bashes lead-up to war, blah, blah, blah, US of KKKA sucks, blah, blah, mookie good, blah, blah.-Urinal/DNC}}}}

{{{{…in an interview published Monday in The Sydney Morning Herald, Howard said he was “baffled” by the decision to withdraw troops, adding he would have shifted them into a training roles.}}}}

Yep, ignore the successes of Iraq, stab your predecessor in the back and flee from the battlefield like a sniveling spineless coward, this guy really is a lib.

~~~~~

{{{{Pet owners face hard decisions in lean economy- Diana Bardsley wiped tears from her eyes as she recalled taking food off her plate to feed her beloved spaniel Hunter and two Siamese cats. Her greatest fear: that she could be forced to surrender the animals as she struggled to stretch her food stamps and Social Security income to meet the escalating cost of living, boo hoo hoo, sniff sniff- Urinal/DNC}}}}

Boy, I sure can’t wait to surrender myself to the government and all the benefits they will lavish upon me, man, I’ll be rich!

Dimwit, mouth breathing, suckas-s liberals writing stories about how lame their promises really are.

Geez.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 8:05 AM | Link to this

{{{{We’ve allowed casuists, left politicians, gullible and sensationalist journalists, and a few dodgy, grant-hungry scientists to stampede us into hysteria about global warming, or in the new preferred phrase “climate change” (which is intellectually incoherent — climate is always changing), on the basis of nothing more than wild speculation dreamed up by computer jockeys who couldn’t tell us whether or not it will rain tomorrow if their lives depended on it. An increasing number of scientists are coming forward to pin the tail on the global warming donkeys, but no one much seems to be paying attention.}}}}

Yeah, what he^^ said.

{{{{Our May has been unusually cold, too. We’ve had a few days that were actually above average, but many of them were well below. Right now our average temps are supposed to be 72. There have been days that we were over 20 degrees below our avg. for that day. Our trees were late in budding and our flowery bushes were very late this year. Even our tulips started blooming late. Our trees still aren’t in full bloom. But that’s ok cause everything is starting to get color around here.}}}}

Morons.

~~~~~~

{{{{The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concluded that a proposal for Lake Lanier and other Chattahoochee River reservoirs to store more water and release less will not be a threat to endangered and threatened fish and mussels downstream.-Urinal}}}}

It’s really comforting to know that they at least considered We The People when they made this decision.

By Georgia Demographics

June 3, 2008 8:09 AM | Link to this

<

The questioner jokingly asked the vice president if he and Obama were going to have a family reunion, to which Cheney replied he would "have no objections" though he said he doubted Obama would want one - "certainly not before November."

Then came the offensive punch line. Cheney explained that during the course of researching his family lineage for Lynne's memoir "Blue Skies, No Fences" last year, he learned there were Cheneys on both his father's and his mother's side of the family. There was a Richard Cheney on his mother's side, the vice president said.

"So I had Cheneys on both sides of the family and we don't even live in West Virginia," Cheney quipped.">>

Cheney thinks you hicks are a joke. He’s right of course.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 8:10 AM | Link to this

Holding down the Obama family fort ‘Grandma’ makes the race possible…..

AND

Barack Obama’s Sister Maya Is Like Him, but Funnier

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 8:12 AM | Link to this

It must be nice to retire and finally be free to speak your mind. Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the man who led American ground forces in Iraq from 2003-2004, has released a new book– titled Wiser in Battle: A Soldier’s Story – that takes aim at the Bush administration with some of the strongest criticism to date from a former Iraq commander.An excerpt from NPR:In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, I watched helplessly as the Bush administration led America into a strategic blunder of historic proportions. It became painfully obvious that the executive branch of our government did not trust its military. It relied instead on a neoconservative ideology developed by men and women with little, if any, military experience. Some senior military leaders did not challenge civilian decision makers at the appropriate times, and the courageous few who did take a stand were subsequently forced out of the service……It’s gonna be hard to accuse General Sanchez of hating the troops.

AND

Retired Air Force Gen. Merrill A. McPeak, was a Republican, a former chief of staff of the Air Force, a former fighter pilot who flew 285 combat missions, and a veteran who campaigned for Dole in ‘96 and Bush in ‘00. This year, he’s supporting Obama — and isn’t at all impressed with McCain. “It doesn’t take very long to uncover national security issues that McCain is weak on,” McPeak said. “For McCain to think he has a monopoly on virtue in the national security issue is going to be shown a pretty flimsy idea very quickly.”

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 8:14 AM | Link to this

The latest on the Siegleman controversy: “A bipartisan group of 54 former state attorneys general from across the country has filed a federal appeals brief supporting former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman’s bid to overturn his criminal conviction. Saying the prosecution and sentencing of Siegelman ‘raised serious First Amendment concerns,’ the brief asks the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Siegelman’s conviction.”

AND

Fieger AcquittedLike any big scandal, the US Attorney firing scandal had any number of tendrils and vines stretching out from the main body of the plant. In this particular story some of the most interesting were a series of prosecutions of Democrats around the country which may or may not have been evidence of the push for politicized prosecutions that got those other US Attorneys fired. The shining example seems to be that of former Gov. Don Siegelman (D) of Alabama, which is still playing out. Then there was the case against Dr. Cyril Wecht, the high-profile coroner of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Then there was the case of Geoffrey Fieger….

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 8:20 AM | Link to this

When the liberals apply their mindless ideas to problems that do not even exist, guess who gets hurt:

{{{{The poor already face energy costs as a much higher percentage of their income than wealthier Americans. While most Americans spend about 4% of their monthly budget on heating their homes or other energy needs, the poorest fifth of Americans spend 19%. A 2006 survey of Colorado homeless families with children found that high energy bills were cited as one of the two main reasons they became homeless.}}}}

Congratulations, you POS.

By Paul

June 3, 2008 8:34 AM | Link to this

Georgia Demographic 8:09

VP Cheney delivered that line at The National Press Club. And just as at Trinity Church, the audience laughed and clapped.

What’s good for the goose -

BTW - ITN - you may want to link the Vanity Fair article on Pres Clinton. It was along the same lines as the NY Times article on Sen McCain - unnamed, anonymous sources, innuendo, etc etc.

I wonder now if the issue isn’t so much a “liberal press” or a “conservative press” as it is an “incompetent press” - be that reporters, editors or both.

ITN 8:12

I’d really like it if instead of broad generalizations, Gen Sanchez would give the names of those senior military officers who gave unwanted input and were forced to retire. Some specifics of the prescient input would be nice, too.

ITN 8:12

Golly, didn’t I read about Gen McPeak a couple times before from someone who is “just a blogger”?

By RB from Gwinnett

June 3, 2008 8:42 AM | Link to this

By AJC/DNC Management 8:20 AM

{{{The poor already face energy costs as a much higher percentage of their income than wealthier Americans. }}}

Hey AJC, what rocket scientist wrote this gem? Guess what… They also spend a higher pecentage of their food stamp money on pet food than wealthy Americans do to! Wow! Imagine the statistics involved with that revelation. I hope that study wasn’t done with government grant money. The really sad thing is the dimwit reporter who wasn’t smart enough to recognize the lack of a real story in the matter. Kinda like liberals who spent 2 days upset about me saying “half the democratic party has below average intelligence”.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 8:44 AM | Link to this

Good ‘toon, Lucko! Obama and the Dems will win in a landslide in November!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 8:45 AM | Link to this

Paul…

I read the Vanity Fair last week…

I have struggled against posting anti-Hillary stuff….Bill has always been the unspoken of “bull elephant” in the room.

The issue has never been liberal press. It is now as it has been, and will continue to be (if we don’t fight media consolidation) - corporate media.

RE: Sanchez, me too.

RE: McPeak, probably. Now you can hear from him.

By Stand up

June 3, 2008 8:52 AM | Link to this

Today’s cartoon was the best in a while. I always wondered about the guys who carry “the end is near” signs. People really believe that. If you march around any city in the world with a properly translated “end is near” sign, you’ll get some followers. You’d get a few more followers if you hold a “beginning of end is near” sign. Of course you’d get everybody if you hold a “end of the beginning is near” sign, and that’s the best bet to make. (Why couldn’t the Redwings hold on with 30 seconds left? Penguins net was empty. If you watch the last minute, Detroit had plenty of opportunities to get the puck back there, I hated last night). On television, doomsday prophets abound, and people send them donations. Good old fashioned fire and brimstone! That’s what this campaign needs. YOu have to wonder how far off message a priest can get if he improves a bit like the Hillary/Black man bit. What does this guy think he’s gotta do to caucus, anyway? It’s getting very very difficult to justify supporting the lunatic fringe of the left when they obviously have just as many pointed heads as the rabid right. Moderation, people. Sure, lets keep taxes low, but lets not spend what little there is on arbitrary wars. I think Bush should start talking about bicycling to work. I’m serious. Cities should have bicycle lanes on the expressways into town for a couple of hours in the morning to get people downtown. They should make the penalty for running over a cyclist very steep, say, a 10 gallon of gas penalty, and they should lower the speed limit then to 35 mph and use cameras to enforce with another 10 gallon of gas penalty. That’ll slow the cowboys down. Aw it’s gonna be great folks, cause there’s SO many things we can do. We’re going to open the abandoned coal mines to tourists. We’re going to sell homeowners canaries in cages to keep in their bathrooms to warn them if their sewer is backed up or if that breakfast burrito your husband ate backfired on him. Yes, people, we can have change. but change itself isn’t enough. No. We need hope for a better tomorrow! And that’s where underfunded pension plans for judges comes in. Lets get all the judges angry at society by cutting their retirement plans off at the knees, (read Wooten today), that way, if any of us appear before a magistrate for even

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 8:53 AM | Link to this

Paul @ 8:34 — it’s easy to find the Vanity Fair link… also, you may want to know that the author of the article is DeeDee Myers’ husband (DeeDee was President Clinton’s press secretary), and he has had access to the Clintons’ inner group for many years:

I have covered Clinton on and off for 16 years, since his 1992 presidential campaign. I first really met him on New Year’s Eve 1994, when he shook my hand on the beach at Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, and let his eyes travel ever so subtly to the newly issued White House press pass hanging around my neck, so that he could know to say, “I’m glad you’re here, Todd.” As a White House correspondent for The New York Times for more than two years, I spent some part of almost every day watching, thinking about, worrying about, or writing about Clinton and his never-a-dull-moment presidency.

By Devastator

June 3, 2008 9:17 AM | Link to this

ITN,

You are correct in your assertion concerning the media.

They are like the kid in school who can’t fight, but wants everyone else to. They instigate by telling each side what the other is doing and saying, but can’t accomplish anything of significance themselves.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 9:19 AM | Link to this

Mr. Rove seems willing to talk about this case everywhere except where he is required to: in Congress, in public, under oath. The American people, and Mr. Siegelman, are counting on Congress to find out the truth.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 9:24 AM | Link to this

ITFS,

Watch out for the law of unintended consequences in your crusade against media consolidation. While I agree that a certain amount of independence is required, once you force each outlet to maintain it’s full cost structure you’ll find them cutting costs where they can which likely be in the news gathering arena. Then you’ll have your Utopian “free” media that all get their stories from a very few sources.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 9:29 AM | Link to this

Thanks, R.W.McMultiname…..

I always take your advice to heart.

Then I take a Pepcid.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 9:35 AM | Link to this

ITFS,

It’s really too bad you lack the ability to discuss a topic, but I guess when you only deal in mindless platitudes like “corporate media” without ever thinking it through that can happen to you. Enjoy life in your bubble!

Note to the actual AJC Management: As always you have my express permission to confirm or deny newsie’s paranoid, delusional obsessions.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 9:37 AM | Link to this

{{{{“How Obama’s campaign has treated Hillary will not be forgotten,” Janet Rogers, 55, who runs a Bed and Breakfast in Medina, Ohio, wrote me. “I will vote for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee. My husband and friends all feel the same way.”}}}}

Bwa.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 9:41 AM | Link to this

An investigation by the NASA inspector general found that political appointees in the space agency’s public affairs office worked to control and distort public accounts of its researchers’ findings about climate change for at least two years, the inspector general’s office said yesterday.

AND THEN THERE”S DUH

By Paul

June 3, 2008 9:42 AM | Link to this

ITN

I didn’t really want you to post the Vanity Fair - just kinda’ tweakin’ ya’ - I do not have much use for articles focusing on the personal lives of public figures. Unless they’ve made their “virtue” a campaign issue, that is.

The article strikes me a lot like McClellan’s book - lots of repeats, nothing new. Just a new author’s take on the matter.

Regarding Gen McPeak - Obama would be well served to get guys like him (and there are more as his advisors) out front, soon and often.

He makes a good point about the “image” that accrues to McCain because of his past career. But one can really argue a military career - at his level, with his background - makes his national security views as valid as, say, all those guys the anti-Iraq crowd parades because “they’re vets who served in Iraq.” Does the guy working the GM SUV factory line have, by default, a valid opinion about the US vehicle market?

Goldie

Pls see my response to ITN. Also, I don’t have much use for anonymous, unnamed sources as the basis for an artricle. Just strikes me as a bit… cowardly for both the author and the sources.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 9:47 AM | Link to this

Paul,

The other thing about the Vanity Fair article is that there wasn’t any news in it whatsoever for anybody that’s had their eyes open for the last 16 years.

It’s pretty funny to watch the sheeple all wide eyed over it though.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 9:47 AM | Link to this

Go Bob Barr — BWAAAAAAAA!

Republicans irate at their party’s direction may well give McCain cause for worry.— The new Libertarian champion, Bob Barr, a former four-term Georgia congressman, is most famous for his poor judgment and sour temper.

A lot of voters are laughing all the way into November!

By @@

June 3, 2008 9:47 AM | Link to this

Well shute ml! you can see “the end” on either “jack’sass”.

Onto sincere well wishes for Senator Kennedy and Senator Byrd.

Teddy’s brain surgery has been declared a success.

Researchers at Duke have spent the past few years investigating a cutting-edge vaccine that could potentially double the survival time for patients who have Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

(((The trial has expanded to 20 sites and more patients nationwide and is now being run by a private company, Mr. Archer said.)))

(((If this vaccine continues to succeed, “it will be huge,” he said. “We’re really excited.”)))

Duke is where you wanna be for brain surgery - on the cutting edge of research and development, they are…

Senator Kennedy would do well to remember his personal experience when advocating socialized medicine for the rest of us.

By Devastator

June 3, 2008 9:48 AM | Link to this

The only thing the Obama campaign has done to Hillary is defeat her. They continue to go out of their way to treat her with the upmost respect for who she is and what she has accomplished.

Voting for McCain is just an excuse for not voting for Obama for obvious reasons!

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 9:50 AM | Link to this

Paul @ 9:42 — so, according to your “cowardly” criteria, there should never have been a Deep Throat for exposing Nixon’s criminality? How convenient that must be for you.

By Devastator

June 3, 2008 9:57 AM | Link to this

RW,

The Vanity Fair article is just like McClelland’s book isn’t it? Its nothing everyone didn’t already know.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 10:02 AM | Link to this

Paul…

“Obama would be well served to get guys like him (and there are more as his advisors) out front, soon and often.”

As you would expect - Obama is out ahead of that already!

He is endorsed by:

Clifford Alexander, Jr., former Secretary of the Army[129]

Susan Ahn Cuddy, first female gunner officer in the U.S. Navy and daughter of Korean Independence fighter Ahn Chang-ho[176]

Tom Daniels, Texas Air National Guard[129]

Richard Danzig, former Secretary of the Navy[129]

Larry Gillespie, Brigadier General (Ret), Assistant Deputy Commanding General, (ARNG) Army Material Command[177]

Scott Gration Major General (USAF-Ret), former Director of Strategy, Policy, and Assessments of the United States European Command in Germany[177]

Donald Joseph Guter, former Judge Advocate General of the Navy, current Dean, Duquesne University School of Law, Pittsburgh[129][177]

Richard D. Hearney, former Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps[129]

John Hutson, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy[178]

Jeh Johnson, former General Counsel of the U.S. Air Force[129]

Lester Lyles, former Vice Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force[129]

David ‘Dave’ McGinnis, Brigadier General (Ret), former Chief of Staff of the National Guard Association of the U.S.[177]

Merrill A. McPeak, four star General (Ret), former Secretary of the United States Air Force during Operation Desert Storm, [177][179][180]

John B. Nathman (Ret), former Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command and Vice Chief of Naval Operations[129][177]

F. Whitten Peters, former Secretary of the Air Force[129]

Hugh Robinson, Major General (Ret), Commander of the Southwestern Division[177]

James Smith, Brigadier General (USAF-Ret), former Commander, Joint Warfighting Center, U.S. Joint Forces Command, Joint Training Analysis and Simulation Center[129][177]

Robert ‘Willie’ Williamson Rear Admiral (USN-Ret), served as military Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition and Director, Office of Program Appraisal.

Ralph Wooten Major General (Ret), former Commanding General of the Army’s Chemical Arsenal, currently the Executive Vice President of Management Systems, Inc.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 10:06 AM | Link to this

{{{{By IN THE NEWS June 3, 2008 9:41 AM An investigation by the NASA inspector general found that political appointees in the space agency’s public affairs office worked to control and distort public accounts of its researchers’ findings about climate change for at least two years, the inspector general’s office said yesterday.}}}}

Oh yeah, SNEWZE, bombard us with whining from NASA about “global warming,” a subject that they do not even have a remote connection to, that’ll really show us:

{{{{Toilet troubles on Space Station could force cosmonauts to Earth early…}}}}

Nice, hundreds of millions of dollars to send a toilet into space, but is it low flow?

{{{{Bricks and mortar blew off the US space shuttle’s launch pad during its weekend liftoff, without damaging the orbiter but causing concern for future missions, NASA said Monday.}}}}

Maybe if these dimwits focused on their real purpose in life……..

By RB from Gwinnett

June 3, 2008 10:06 AM | Link to this

By @@ 9:47 AM

{{{Senator Kennedy would do well to remember his personal experience when advocating socialized medicine for the rest of us.}}}

I wouldn’t bet on it.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 10:08 AM | Link to this

Dhimmistator,

I read through the Vanity Fair article, but McClellan’s book is only coming out today. From what I’ve heard he makes the same allegations we’ve heard from all you cultists, but never backs them up with any facts or historical evidence. Again that would be much like you cultists. I’ll wait a couple weeks and pick up a copy at Dollar Tree.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 10:09 AM | Link to this

While McCain and his cohorts insisted that his obvious error wasn’t an error at all, the senator nevertheless changed his rhetoric yesterday. That’s the good news. The bad news is, McCain’s still wrong.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 10:09 AM | Link to this

Yeap, put a fork in her.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 10:20 AM | Link to this

Has anybody seen any attacks on the SUBSTANCE of McClellan’s book?

By Paul

June 3, 2008 10:21 AM | Link to this

Goldie 9:50

Not even in the same universe. One is gossip on personal lives for political advantage or payback. The other was about criminal activity - ongoing - and the source would have been fired. Rather the difference between neighbors gossiping and Ghandian civil disobedience.

By Devastator

June 3, 2008 10:27 AM | Link to this

RW,

Cultists,secular, mainstream, left leaning. If those of you on the right weren’t namecalling everyone that disagreed with you, you wouldn’t have a platform.

A recent expert showed that Obama’s loss in WV exceeded the amount of votes McCain’s win there did. How does it feel to know that your inevitable defeat is near?

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 10:33 AM | Link to this

McBush continues his flip-flopping ways… he voted against Obama’s legislation for Iran divestment last year, and now McBush is on the campaign stump promoting divestment:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) today released the following statement after the House of Representatives passed the Iran Sanctions Enabling Act (H.R. 2347/S. 1430), legislation he sponsored in May. The bill would clear the way for more states to divest their pension funds from companies that support Iran’s oil and gas industry. Iran uses the revenue it generates from its energy sector to finance its pursuit of nuclear weapons and support for terrorist groups.

Who could ever believe that McBush knows what he’s talking about these days???

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 10:37 AM | Link to this

ITN @ 10:20 — no, I don’t think any of Dubya’s mouthpieces have said that there’s no truth to what Scottie wrote… only that he was “not the same person” they once knew. That’s what the memo told ‘em all to say last week.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 10:38 AM | Link to this

Dhimmistator,

When you compare state votes totals between parties from primary contests you’re usually comparing apples to oranges. Different methods and circumstances are in play as well as different rules. For instance West Virginia had already allocated most of their delegates through a state convention weeks before any Republicans voted and by then the Republicans already had a presumptive nominee.

ITFS,

What substance?

By Devastator

June 3, 2008 10:42 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

They were also told to ask why didn’t he say these things before? As if he was going to write a book against his boss while he was working there.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 10:43 AM | Link to this

Isn’t it ironic….

{{ What substance}}

From RW McMultiname!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 10:53 AM | Link to this

McCain emphasizes gas-tax holiday again, rails against ‘elites’

AND

Even Dick Cheney believes that John McCain’s gax tax holiday is a bad idea. “I think it’s a false notion, in the sense that you’re not going to have much of an impact, given the size of the gasoline tax on the total cost of the gallon of gas,” Cheney said.

By AmVet

June 3, 2008 10:53 AM | Link to this

First - that’s it! I’m canceling my subscription! When is cartoon boy going to stop always hammering on the Democrats?

(For the morons here. And you know who you are).

McClellan, McSchmellan.

We all know it is a pack of filthy lies. Just like ALL the other scurrilous allegations preceding it. And the many which will probably follow it.

This “conservative” Republican administration has proven over and over and over again, that they are the most virtuous, most forthright and most effective EVER!

Nary a mistake, nary a lie, nary an act of corruption or self-interest.

At least to the immoral idiots who voted for them and now keep apologizing for them…

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 11:00 AM | Link to this

{{Nary a mistake, nary a lie, nary an act of corruption or self-interest.}}

AmVet @ 10:53 — are you off your meds this morning? :-)

By Stand up

June 3, 2008 11:01 AM | Link to this

Darn, I keep going over the word limit. If only there was a way to write my comment on, say, Word, and then copy/paste it onto the comment box.

A mime blogging inside the comment box: He would type, “Palm, Palm, Hand, hand, nose nose, Palm Palm, hand hand, switch to other side, hand hand, sidle sideways, hand hand Palm Palm”.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 11:01 AM | Link to this

AmVet,

I don’t think McClellan is telling lies, he’s just telling the truth a little too late.

And it seems to me, he is trying to cash in while he can, which I find pretty (in my best Sylvester the Cat voice) de-spicable.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 11:05 AM | Link to this

Devastator @ 10:42 — and we all know what happened to ANYONE who spoke up with an opinion differing from Cheney & Rumsfeld… which General was it that had to resign after stating that 300,000 to 500,000 troops would be needed for “regime change” in Iraq? And Colin Powell did not willingly resign as SOS…

By Devastator

June 3, 2008 11:05 AM | Link to this

Bosch,

Always the diplomat, aren’t you buddy?

I’m going to meet some friends for bowling now. I’m going to pretend that the pins are Rw and Duh. See you later!

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 11:13 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

I like to think that Powell DID resign willingly - I think he saw the sh!tstorm a’coming.

By AmVet

June 3, 2008 11:13 AM | Link to this

Goldie, nope. Thanks to the VA, I can both afford and take my meds!

The comment was meant to be ironic?

Bosch, these all-too-late, meaningless (in any real sense) and well-paying “epiphanies” are becoming de rigeur in Washington these days.

It goes like this - I’ll join in with the scumbags and then after the you-know-what hits the fan, I’ll “see the light” and make some dough!

It used to be they found Jesus, but that is becoming more and more passe, as the bulk of the country cares less and less about their mythology.

Most intelligent Americans need Scotties confirmations of this horrific administration’s f&ckups like a drowning man needs a description of the water.

The American people need to be thrown a rope! Preferably one wrapped around the necks of Bushco.

And it is coming this November…

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 11:14 AM | Link to this

Bosch,

Since newsie won’t take a shot at the question perhaps you can. What substance?

People that have read the book say there is no factual substance to back up the allegations. Now granted these are people with a reason to say that even if it isn’t true, but I’m highly suspicious when Scott doesn’t make any firm claims on his interviews and even Olberman told his 3 viewers that one need only read the chapter titles.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 11:15 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

hit the post button too soon -

And I think Powell saw what was going on, was way too much of a human being for the Bushies and left. Powell is echelons higher than Bush & Co. ever dreamed of being. He had/has a conscious which is something Bush & Co. never had.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 11:25 AM | Link to this

Dhimmistator,

Your cult leader already tried pretending Andy and I were bowling pins and managed to roll a 39. Perhaps instead of vicarious violence against fellow citizens you should concentrate on your game.

Well those golf balls aren’t going to hit themselves.

Later!

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 11:31 AM | Link to this

Bosch @ 11:15 — I agree somewhat with you… Powell made his arguments against the idea of “regime change”, but then went before the U.N. and lied about the mobile labs because he was following Bush and Cheney’s orders (like the good soldier he was). He really had no choice but to resign, because he knew what he did for Bush was wrong.

By getalife

June 3, 2008 11:33 AM | Link to this

The Clintons just punked CNN by telling AP she would concede, let them report it, then call it a lie.

Too funny.

By Steven Daedalus

June 3, 2008 11:34 AM | Link to this

Repuds, Creep to the edge, look on over, jump with the rest of the rats.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 11:34 AM | Link to this

Mr. RW McMultiname says:

{{People that have read the book say there is no factual substance to back up the allegations. Now granted these are people with a reason to say that even if it isn’t true, but I’m highly suspicious when Scott doesn’t make any firm claims on his interviews and even Olberman told his 3 viewers that one need only read the chapter titles.}}

I asked the question earlier, if any one had seen an attack on McClellens books’ substance.

Then this…

WHO? Come on dude? WHO?

WHICH PEOPLE WHO HAVE READ THE BOOK?

Hell, The White House has had the book for nigh on to a month!!!!

WHO?

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 11:36 AM | Link to this

Sad ain’t it…..

R.W.McMultiname is not following his master and giving up golf to support the troops……

By Georgia Demographics

June 3, 2008 12:22 PM | Link to this

Yes, Paul, I agree with Cheney - you hillbillies are a big effing joke.

It’s so sad that you vote, though.

By Midori

June 3, 2008 12:25 PM | Link to this

ITN:

That dumb cluck just makes crap up as he goes along.

I’d like to see his answer as to why the Bush WH had the book for over a month, yet had nothing to say about it.

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS @11:36

Why don’t you support the troops by giving up blogging? Such loyalty would be appreciated by many.

Maybe you could try decoupage. That takes a lot of cut’n’paste also. Doesn’t need any original ideas either. Try it. You need a CHANGE!

By Midori

June 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Link to this

Taking career and/or hobby ideas from Crusty is like taking hair care tips from Phyllis Diller.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 12:37 PM | Link to this

RW,

Like you said earlier about the Vanity Fair article - anyone who hasn’t been asleep for the past 16 years - same goes for McClellan - or in his case, asleep for 8 years - McClellan isn’t saying anything new to us.

Can it be proven? Nope. Do I think what he’s doing is despicable? Yes. Not because he said what he said, but WHEN he’s chosen to say it and it’s obvious he’s doing it for the money.

Do I think it has substance? Don’t know yet - like you, I will pick up a copy at the Dollar Tree. I usually don’t comment on substance of something until I’ve read it - the people who are saying it has no substance? Um….their the ones being criticized in the book - or being paid to say what they say.

If the Congressional Judiciary Committee thinks it has substance, I’m sure they’ll put a subpoena in his hand.

Things don’t have to be proven in order for people to think they are legitimate concerns being raised.

Take God for instance - you just believe it’s real or not - the existence of God will never be proven to those who just don’t believe it, and will never be verifiable to those who do believe.

I believe Bush and his cronies are lying, cheating, manipulative, criminals who deserve to be brought up on war crimes and thrown in prison for the rest of their pathetic lives. But that’s just me. I’m sure you have just as much affection for Clinton.

Goldie,

Powell has a conscious - that’s why he left - I think he was duped like many others, realized his errors and got the hell out - like a true gentleman and military man would. I also believe that if anyone could chose to bring down Bush, it would be him. You know he has saved every email, post-it note, etc. related to his involvement with this administration. He knows s**, but is too good to tell it because he knows what it would do to our country, of course, imho.

Out to enjoy the nice weather!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Link to this

DUSTY

YOU NEED A CHANGE TOO!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 12:45 PM | Link to this

New revelations by former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan raise additional questions about the actions of the President and the Vice President. Mr. McClellan has stated that “[t]he President and Vice President directed me to go out there and exonerate Scooter Libby.” He has also asserted that “the top White House officials who knew the truth — including Rove, Libby, and possibly Vice President Cheney — allowed me, even encouraged me, to repeat a lie.” It would be a major breach of trust if the Vice President personally directed Mr. McClellan to mislead the public…….. Waxman requests that Mukasey provide the FBI interviews to the committee by June 10.

By GreenJeans

June 3, 2008 12:50 PM | Link to this

(Powell)…”is too good to tell it because he knows what it would do to our country, of course, imho.”

Bosch, I think telling “it” would be the most patriotic thing Powell could ever do for our country.

We need a collective mental enema, and badly.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 12:59 PM | Link to this

Green Jeans

I’m with you on Powell.

Loyalty to the party, President or ideology should be BEHIND (way the hell behind)loyalty to the Nation.

Yes, it would cause investigations and hopefully indictments and incarcerations - OH NO!! - but it would also go along way in impressing on our elected officials that it’s not nice to fool Mother America!

Sometimes truth, justice and the American way hurts.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 1:00 PM | Link to this

GreenJeans,

Saw this as I’m lacing my shoes -

While I agree with you, I don’t think Powell would. Powell is a career military general - and a damn good one at that - and I think that in today’s explosive polarized environment - if I could read his mind (which I can’t of course - this is only my opinion), I feel that he would think that is a bad thing to continue to constant battling that goes on within our own country.

Who know? Maybe he’ll surprise us one day.

Now — where’s that sunshine?

By Young Republican

June 3, 2008 1:01 PM | Link to this

So it appears that al queada bombing of the Demark embassy in Pakistan could have been easily avoided.

President Bush has had it right the whole time. We are at war and wartime is no time to be getting all romantic with freedom.

The liberal media is directly responsible for this bombing. That cartoon was an act of war. It should be quite obvious now why Bush has curtailed some freedoms we have taken advantage of. If incendiary cartoons are banned there are no bombings PERIOD. Why you liberals take the side of the enemy is just mind boggling. Its time to shut all the sissy liberals up.

Oh my God! I might have to keep my big liberal mouth shut for the sake of my country and future freedom. Losers.

Notice how the liberal media is barely covering the embassy bombing? Figures, they have blood on their hands and they don’t even care.

McCain/Huckabee ‘08

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 1:08 PM | Link to this

GOTTA LOVE A YOUNG REPUBLICAN

By Donovan

June 3, 2008 1:25 PM | Link to this

Bosch - McClellan telling the truth “a little too late”? First of all, how much later, in the scheme of things, could the man be? Second, he’s a classic case of somebody’s dimpled darling (think, that silly daughter of Aaron Spelling) pretending that he attended the Revolution. Having bought and read his book with the intent of staying atop some important development, I found myself a fool and a Mark — as stupid as the people who bought Watergate-According-To-Bart-Porter.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 1:40 PM | Link to this

{{President Bush has had it right the whole time.}}

Young Repug— go on believin’, cause you have nothing else after November! Thanks to your guy Bush, America and the rest of the world are less safe now than we all were on 9/11…

By O.J.

June 3, 2008 1:46 PM | Link to this

Does it ever occur to you that you’re dancing in the End Zone, while the officials have the last say?

Fools.

By Leftist Pete

June 3, 2008 1:47 PM | Link to this

Al Queda is free today because of Bush/Cheney treason. We had Al Queda cornered in 2002, and Cheney refused to allow Rummy to attack.

that’s treason. ANd I hope one day history exposes Bush’s traitors.

When Bush was Commander in Chief, the terrorists won.

2 the well adjusted gentlemen on the right: STFU, you pukey p-holes. You cant win. You’re finished. Nobody gonna vote for you or your stupid philosophy of corruption and greed and professional gods.

By Midori

June 3, 2008 1:49 PM | Link to this

the only thing Bush has ever been right about is his political persuasion.

the one AND only thing!!

By O.J.

June 3, 2008 1:50 PM | Link to this

Bother to look up the definition of “Treason”, Pete, or STFU.

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 1:52 PM | Link to this

Golly Gee IN THE NEWS 12:43

Now you are advertising DEPENDS?? I wanted you to post from experience but you can skip some things.

Bosch @12:37

You, and others like you here, are the biggest ingrates this world has known. You live in the most freedom, the best protected and the most prosperous country in the world. And the man who has preserved and brought much of that to America is President Bush.

He has led the fight against terrorism and delivered to two suppressed countries the chance at freedom.

There has never been any illegal action brought against the President(although his haters have tried) because he has done nothing illegal. But you want him tried for ‘war crimes’!

If anyone should be tried for war crimes it should be people like you who have fought against every effort the USA has made to secure our freedom. You have undermined the military, the Commander-in-Chief,Homeland Security, the vice president all of whom have done nothing wrong. Besides your deceitful fight against the survival of the USA, liberals like you have led a do nothing and shameful Congress.

If YOU aren’t tried for war crimes, you should be charged with pure stupidity and dishonor. That’s what liberals like you post here five days a week, interminable libel against this country.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 1:52 PM | Link to this

Goldie…. I don’t know about what Young Republican calls “liberal media” but I read about the attack on Democratic Underground.

BTW, I just searched the FOX website and couldn’t find it there…..those damn liberals!!!!!

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 1:55 PM | Link to this

Geez, the AP is sure trying everything it can to railroad Bruno out of the race, how does it feel to have these scumbags stabbing you dimwits in the back?

{{{{Barack Obama effectively clinched the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, based on an Associated Press tally of convention delegates, becoming the first black candidate ever to lead his party into a fall campaign for the White House.}}}}

{{{{>>>>>>The AP tally<<<<<<< was based on public commitments from delegates as well as >>>>>>more than a dozen private commitments.<<<<<<< It also included a minimum number of delegates Obama was guaranteed even if he lost the final two primaries in South Dakota and Montana later in the day.}}}}}

Hilarious, the dhimmokrats don’t even bother counting the votes anymore, they just appoint their king.

Klowns.

By GMAN

June 3, 2008 2:00 PM | Link to this

Thanks In The News for the “GOTTA LOVE A YOUNG REPUBLICAN” link. It reminds me of a story my grandfather once told me. “What is the difference between involved and committed? In a bacon and egg breakfast, the chicken was involved, the pig was committed.” These chickenhawks aren’t even committed.

By Political Foreskin

June 3, 2008 2:01 PM | Link to this

CNN just reported that a cycling bear (escaped from the circus?), was struck and killed by motorists on I-75 in Cobb Country. The bear apparently refused to yeild to larger, faster vehicles and instead insisted on his right of way in the bicycling lane that wasn’t there.

Gas is expensive, people, and we need to have bicycle lanes on the x-ways. Save the bears. Make way for the cycles.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 2:03 PM | Link to this

Hey Duh!

Ya’ know, I hate that some Democrats learned that lesson about not counting all the votes from the Republicans!

Damn, a few dems are nearly as dense as the GOP!

It’s the curse of the big tent!

By W stands for worst

June 3, 2008 2:04 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

So that is what it is like living in a fantasy world. Wow i didnt realize W had been our president since 1776 and brought us all this freedom. Oops i forgot, my phones are tapped, im searched at the airport if i have a bottle of water and we now toture. Yep we sure are lucky to have him to secure our freedoms. Now im off to bike since i have joined our President and given up golf as a way to support our troops…

By mm

June 3, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

You are a bigger loser than Duh, RW, and RB combined.

There is nothing more disgusting than fake patriotism.

By O.J.

June 3, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this

The problem with your naming of “Bruno”, AJC/DNC, is that fail to employ the plural. As she is not her own woman, but rather is the present face of a syndicate, it’s misleading of you to depict her as her own woman; she belongs, but not to herself.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this

Screengrab from donut sleeper cell training video surfaces

They’re everywhere!

They’re everywhere!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 2:10 PM | Link to this

Thanks GMAN

Just bringing home the bacon!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 2:13 PM | Link to this

Now Olbermann reports that McCain’s Phil Gramm scandal has widened, explaining that the former Republican senator from Texas “made it easier for bin Laden. … In the Senate he blocked legislation that would have enabled the Bush administration to force foreign banks into cooperating on anti-terror measures before and after 9/11……..Olbermann went on to point out that “on September 20, 2001, the New York Times reported that a single senator had blocked legislation that would have helped US investigators track Osama bin Laden’s financial network before 9/11. It was Phil Gramm — who still defended these tax havens after 9/11, whose bank was still lobbying Congress on behalf of tax havens as recently as last year.”……This fresh controversy about Gramm arose as McCain was blasting Obama for his promise to talk with Iranian leaders and the Obama campaign was responding that McCain “continues to cling to a foreign policy that’s failed to make the U.S. or Israel safer.”“

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 2:23 PM | Link to this

mm@2:05

You are correct. There is nothing more disgusintg than ‘fake patriotism’.

That is why I disagree with far left liberals here. They are disgusting in their display of ‘patriotism to kill the country’.

Even Obama has realized the dire consequences of proclaiming “fake patriotism” like that of Wright, his wife and other anti-American buddies. He has realized it disgusts voters who love America.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 2:25 PM | Link to this

Dust For Brains @ 1:52 — you’d better get goin’ cause you’re late for your 28% Club meeting. Oh, and don’t forget your blinders!

By Political Foreskin

June 3, 2008 2:26 PM | Link to this

CNN just reported that a cycling bear was struck and killed on I-75 in Cobb Country. Witnesses claim the bear thought the HOV lane was a bicycle lane.

the motorist did not stop

Gas is expensive, and bears are changing their lifestyles. We need a bike lane.

Some times nothing gets done until there’s a tragedy, you know?

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 2:28 PM | Link to this

Damn that sunshine is HOT! I’m about to have a heatstroke.

Well, I see that some of my blog friends have answered Dusty for me.

Thanks guys. Yes, fake patriotism is quite nauseating.

I knew that would get her all riled up.

Dusty,

Blah, blah, blah. Whatever (as I roll my eyes). You believe what you want, and so will I. That’s our rights as Americans isn’t it?

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 2:30 PM | Link to this

Oh Dusty, forgot,

So you think I should be tried as a war criminal for my opinion?

I think Bush should be tried based on some of his actions, not just because he SAID something, but because he DID something.

You’re not stupid, you are dangerous.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 2:32 PM | Link to this

And so…..

it is the end of the world…..

Clinton is admitting defeat.

RIP Clinton political team - I hope you enjoy your civilian lives together as you leave the rest of us alone.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 2:33 PM | Link to this

I like how Obama likes it that McBush is now preaching about Iran divestment, after McBush has spent the past year fighting divestment:

During the Bush Administration, Iran has dramatically expanded its nuclear program, going from zero centrifuges to more than 3000 centrifuges. During the Bush Administration, Iran has expanded its influence throughout a vitally important region, plying Hamas and Hezbollah with money and arms. During the Bush Administration, Hamas took over Gaza. Most importantly, the war in Iraq that John McCain supported and promises to continue indefinitely has done more to dramatically strengthen and embolden Iran than anything in a generation.

SMACKDOWN!

“Confronted with that reality, John McCain promises four more years of the same policies that have strengthened Iran, making the United States and Israel less safe. He promises to continue a war in Iraq that has emboldened Iran and strengthened its hand. He promises sanctions that the Bush Administration has been unable to persuade the Security Council to deliver. He promises a divestment campaign, even though he refused to sign on to Barack Obama’s bipartisan divestment bill, refused to get his colleagues to lift an anonymous hold on the bill, and willfully ignores the fact that trade and investment between Iran and Iraq continue to expand. He stubbornly refuses to engage in aggressive diplomacy, ruling it out unconditionally as a tool of American power.

SMACKDOWN!

By GMAN

June 3, 2008 2:34 PM | Link to this

Dusty, you and your ilk think that the war in Iraq is a video game and that the people dying there are not real. This administration has perpetuated this by not showing you the casualties of war (lost limbs, caskets, etc.) and the real numbers. You wear your lapel pin and place a yellow ribbon on your car in an attempt to hide your cowardice but it only identifies you for what you are a BIG FAT CHICKENHAWK!

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 2:43 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

I know you’ll hate this, but, Bridgette Bardot was convicted of hate crimes today in France - she really hates those Muslims - maybe you should get together some money to send her to help with her fines.

By More! More!

June 3, 2008 2:47 PM | Link to this

Young Republican + Dusty = SATIRE.

Give ‘em a hand, they’ve nailed it.

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 2:56 PM | Link to this

Poor ol’ Boschi,

He thinks he should be free to express his opinions but I should not express mine.(Dangerous!) Bush has done nothing wrong but Bosch wants him tried for “war crimes”.

bosch says he has done nothing wrong. Undermining the country and making false accusations is a “crime” during war times or anytime. Why don’t we try Bosch for what we have decided is “war crimes” just like he is doing?

Have you ever heard of Ezra Pound? Look him up. “Ugly Americans” are not appreciated during war time.

So you and the other cut-n-runners here best temper your lies and unproven accusations a bit. They are not popular or acceptable among those of us who love this country. And.. we have every right to say so.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 2:56 PM | Link to this

Do you listen to the kandy as-s surrender monkey pinkos or to our brave soldier’s families?

{{{{Four times we’ve watched him go to war, worried that we might never see him again. Four times we’ve watched him come home, relieved at his safe return and awed by his sense of duty and love of country.}}}}

{{{{Pride can’t begin to describe the way I feel about my son and the thousands of brave men and women just like him who, in the most difficult of circumstances, have achieved successes few thought possible. Indeed, CIA Director Michael Hayden recently told Congress that al-Qaeda has been essentially defeated in Iraq and is on the defensive around the world.}}}}

{{{{Yet there is another emotion burning inside me — anger. Anger at a Congress that refuses to recognize the accomplishments of our most selfless citizens and puts politics ahead of supporting our troops.}}}}

{{{{This Congress, led by Nanny Pelosi and Hairy Reed, has spent the last two years doing everything in its power to undermine the success of our troops — of my son.}}}}

{{{{I’ve watched this all unfold, somewhat stunned by the depth of the liberal commitment to America’s defeat. It’s saddened me.}}}}

I know who’s side I’m on.

By Copyleft

June 3, 2008 3:07 PM | Link to this

Bosch, the real danger is the right-wing authoritarian mindset that Dusty represents.

In that dangerously anti-American and anti-freedom perspective, ANY disagreement or dissent is treason. Not the sign of a healthy democracy, but pure EVIL in its rawest form. The right-wing follower is motivated by fear and hatred, dressed up in faux patriotism.

Facts do not matter to such a person—witness the Bush administration’s attempt to censor science. Logic does not apply—witness the free pass that McLame and his constant flip-flops get, from the group that supposedly abhors “flip-floppers.” Even blatant contradictions don’t bother them: “This is the free-est country in the world, and you should be shot if you disagree!”

The right-wing authoritarian mind is simply one that cannot, DARE not, think at all. And it’s what the Bush-types rely on to seize and retain power: stupidity and fear. It’s a dangerous combination.

No, the really troubling thing about Dusty is that she represents a full 28% of Americans—fellow citizens who have ZERO understanding of what being an American really means, and who would gladly destroy our freedoms and ideals in the name of protecting them.

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 3:08 PM | Link to this

Boschi.2:43

.So Bardot hates Muslims! And you libs support them by word of mouth every day. Maybe you should move to France.

I despise Muslim terrorists who kill Americans and want to kill more. Are you for or against terrorism?

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 3:12 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Your reading comprehension abilities are lacking - I guess you missed the part where I wrote, “You believe what you want, and so will I. That’s our rights as Americans isn’t it?”

But as usual you conveniently overlook things when they don’t fit into your scope of the world - that is dangerous.

And of course you are entitled to your opinion, it’s your right.

Poor ol’Dusty,

She thinks those who disagree with her should be tried for war criminals. Dangerous and delusional.

Wow, you are comparing me to Ezra Pound? You are scary.

Joe McCarthy kind of scary. Look him up - people don’t like him much either.

By W stands for worst

June 3, 2008 3:14 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Ah yes using a sentance and you have no idea why it was used. He used that term because in WWII he lived in Italy and didnt want the US to enter the war. I think this quote he used is more in line with you and the rest of the Bush lovers: “America is a lunatic asylum.”

By Copyleft

June 3, 2008 3:14 PM | Link to this

I’m certainly against the brand of terrorism you and the Bushies practice, Dusty.

Why don’t you move to Iran, where you’ll fit right in? Since you hate America so much….

By Political Foreskin

June 3, 2008 3:17 PM | Link to this

Brigett BowWow in France has long been an animal rights activist. Good think she’s in jail for hatin’ in France, cause think what she’d do to islamist-luvin scum like Dusty over here.

Dusty, go join AL Queda if you hate this country and the american people so much.

Nobody will miss you. You aint a hottie no mo, (maybe a hot-water bottle)

buwaa!

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 3:23 PM | Link to this

Copyleft

Great Post!

I think it’s all about FEAR.

They are afraid of everything!

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 3:24 PM | Link to this

Copyleft@3:07

You should have left your drums for the anti-war parade at home. You are the only one who has mentioned treason here. That is because you hate the President more than you love the country. You hate it when my freedom of speech does not agree with yours. According to you, my words are EVIL while yours are what? Saintly anti-Americanism?

When love for this country becomes EVIL, let me know. I will turn myself in for my allegiance to the USA.

By Paul

June 3, 2008 3:26 PM | Link to this

Goldie 11:05

“which General was it that had to resign after stating that 300,000 to 500,000 troops would be needed for “regime change” in Iraq?” For the umpteenth time, that was General Shinseki, Army Chief of Staff. He wasn’t fired – he’d announced his retirement about a year earlier. BUT: he was about the only one around to think ahead and answer (when asked, he sure as heck didn’t volunteer it): what happens if after “mission accomplished” these Iraqis don’t follow the historical model?

For the record: the person (military) who should’ve been asking those questions was General Franks, CENTCOM Commander. You know, the guy who wouldn’t give the CIA 800 Rangers for a bin Laden blocking action? The guy who retired a month after the Iraq invasion? He was the one in charge of the theater – not Gen Shinseki. Getalife 11:33

Good to hear she still has a sense of humor and can punk’em. Maybe that’s why they don’t like her?

Bosch 2:43

Take a look sometime at what constitutes prosecutable hate speech in France. Not too much different that “that’s not PC” here – but with the power of the government to put you in jail behind it. Chilling.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 3:29 PM | Link to this

Aahhhh, yes, could it be just us versus McGoDukaKerry?

{{{{And thus the Democratic party is about to nominate a far left candidate in the tradition of George McGovern, albeit without McGovern’s military and political record. The Democratic party is about to nominate a far-left candidate in the tradition of Michael Dukakis, albeit without Dukakis’s executive experience as governor. The Democratic party is about to nominate a far left candidate in the tradition of John Kerry, albeit without Kerry’s record of years of service in the Senate. The Democratic party is about to nominate an unvetted candidate in the tradition of Jimmy Carter, albeit without Jimmy Carter’s religious integrity as he spoke about it in 1976. Questions about all these attributes (from foreign policy expertise to executive experience to senatorial experience to judgment about foreign leaders to the instructors he has had in his cultural values) surround Barack Obama. And the Democratic party has chosen him.}}}}

Bring it on.

By ed lorenzo

June 3, 2008 3:31 PM | Link to this

WHY OPPOSE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

I noticed that my neighbor’s yacht in the deck we shared, began to look abandoned. There was no one to keep that teak deck bright and shiny. The fittings lost their glitter and all other visible parts of that wonderful vessel showed signs of neglect. When I saw him I asked him about it and he told me. “An example would be the best way to illustrate this drama. Let us say that before the year 2000 I sold a product for 1 dollar a can to wholesalers. To produce, process and can and package cost me 70 cents of which 55 were direct labor. Product cost, sales and distribution accounted for 20 cents leaving a pre tax income of 10 cents. In the end I would keep 5 cents. Is that clear?” “Crystal. Go on, the plot thickens.” “Then waves of immigrants, illegal or not, seemed to descend on the area and they were all willing to work their tails off for whatever you offered. Like others, we took advantage of this strange blessing. We hired like mad; in weeks we did not have a single American citizen working for us. We had to learn Spanish and eat more enchiladas, but our labor force seemed to be happy with us and with their work. This was fine. Instead of 55 cents for labor, the cost went down to 15 cents! It just shot the pre tax earnings through the roof. All of us in this business began to enjoy life as prescribed by the Constitution and all that jazz about the pursuit of happiness. For several years the real estate people, the car dealers and the local airlines have enjoyed prosperity like never before. You have no idea, man!” In a sense, both sides won. The immigrants that found a job and a place to call home if somewhat precariously, and the employers who suddenly were able to amass fortunes. Without forgetting that Uncle Sam keeps collecting taxes on almost every steps of the entire chain of events. But, there was always that thin line of reasoning that associates my neighbor’s . fortunes with that of the merchants of the 17th and 18th centuries. Merchants that waited eagerly every time ships laden with slaves reached port. Such reasoning evoked some clear references not only to our Constitution but also to the Bible. I could only comment: “An incredible story. I can see why some people oppose immigration controls, especially if they run a labor intensive shop or have housing developments to build or must harvest millions of tons of produce, not to mention those millions of hotel rooms that must be kept s** and spa

By N-GA

June 3, 2008 3:32 PM | Link to this

Paul,

With what some are posting on this blog, it’s a good thing we no longer have to worry about the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. Those Federalists were a tough bunch!

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 3:34 PM | Link to this

Dusty@3:08,

I don’t like France. It’s dirty. The last time I was there, in Paris, there was cabbage and food flowing down the sides of the street into the sewers which smelled like, well, sewers. But the countryside is nice.

Now you are just getting all rhetorical. You know I don’t answer rhetorical questions you silly woman.

Like I said, why don’t you call some of your church friends, and see if they’ll help you donate some money to help with Ms. Bardot’s legal and her penalty fees.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 3:36 PM | Link to this

I remember awhile back when Dust For Brains was ranting about those vets returning from Iraq who were against the war we have been waging there — she made it real clear that she only “supports” those troops who shares her own small-minded view about what war really means. That’s basically what “patriotism” really means for Dust For Brains — “support my way of stinkin’ thinkin’ or you’re for the terrrrrists! No middle ground or contrary thoughts allowed — only my viewpoint!”

By Young Republican

June 3, 2008 3:36 PM | Link to this

Dusty, don’t let the hater libs get you down. They go hysterical over your posts, that means you’re winning.

Oh and that Young Republican video is the biggest piece of trash around.

Why am I not at war? To keep America strong. Its that simple. My goal is an MBA. If all of America’s future businessmen were to suddenly get up and go to war it would create a huge vacuum. Oh not right now, but in the future. 20 years from now there will not be enough experience and knowledge to lead businesses if our best and brightest are forced to go fight in a war. A war that is better suited to be fought with people that don’t posses the quality skills and leadership abilities like Republicans have. Stop overreacting, that doesn’t necessarily mean minorities have to be the ones that do all the fighting. Although they will be the vast majority, thats just the way it is. When was the last time you heard of a minority CEO? Point proven.

A greater question is why aren’t the liberals in college going to fight for our freedom? Do we really need art majors? LMAO! Journalists?? Don’t we have already enough liberal media elitists? Scientists? To what? Prove that global warming is a fraud or that I evolved from a monkey?

Liberals, you bring no value to society, there is a recruitment center near you. Us Republicans got jobs to provide, and mouths to feed.

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 3:44 PM | Link to this

Copyleft,

You’re preaching to the choir, but I agree with ITN, great post.

I like to see Dusty get all in a tizzy. It reminds me of Barney Fife.

Paul,

Well, in Bardot’s case, it also didn’t help that she sent a letter to Sarkozy. She’s been prosecuted four times - and never served jail time.

Europeans take “hate speech” pretty seriously. Take soccer for example - they fine players for “hate speech” - that’s what happened in the case of Zidane getting kicked out of the World Cup final two years ago (has it been that long? Damn time flies). The Italian a*****, Materazzi called Zidane the “the son of a terrorist w*******” - I’d have headbutted him too, or worse.

If fans are accused of it, they get banned from games.

They take that s** seriously. Too many intense ethnic issues in Europe.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 3:45 PM | Link to this

Young Republican

I thought it was his own butt that he got his head stuck in…..but NO.

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 3:46 PM | Link to this

W@3:14

Perhaps you should read about Ezra Pound again. He was a great and famous poet but…while living In Italy he BROADCAST against the Americans during war time when Hitler and Moussolini were a team. Those broadcast words were labeled as “treasonous” and Pound was found guilty.

I mention Pound as an American that went too far. I think liberals here go too far. Sad to say, much of that hate started when Democratic candidates could not get elected. Or of they did, they failed (Congress leadership!) Thus it has moved on to include even our efforts to protect this country.

Make any excuse you want, but anti-Americanism is NOT good for the country. It is just another way for us to lose our freedom.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 3:49 PM | Link to this

Bosch

Barney Fife????

Too funny! Too acurate!

Nita, Juanita…..

Dusty Fife and the one bullet in her pocket!

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 3:54 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

You’re right, anti-Americanism is NOT good for the country, and George W. Bush proves that point everyday, by his complete incompetence as a leader.

I considered your failed hero, George W. Bush, the biggest anti-American criminal this country has ever seen.

You think I should be put in jail for that opinion? If so, you just prove my point.

By Goldie

June 3, 2008 3:54 PM | Link to this

{{Don’t we have already enough liberal media elitists? Scientists? To what? Prove that global warming is a fraud or that I evolved from a monkey?}}

Young Repug @ 3:36 — I believe your post proves that you evolved from a slug.

RWNJIFG, is that you?

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 4:01 PM | Link to this

Goldie

I suspect Young Republican is you know who……

Same phrases….

By W stands for worst

June 3, 2008 4:04 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

You can quote whoever you want to try and justify your blindness of the Iraq war. Bottom line is if this was a Dem pres acting like W you would be screaming from the top of your outhouse. You preach patriotism daily on this site, the only problem is you are patriotic only to the GOP and not this country….

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 4:04 PM | Link to this

Boschi,

My church does not delve in politics as you seem to expect. The only money sent overseas is hefty sums sent for world relief. Our denomination has an agency well known around the world.

We do not have ministers who preach politics or hate or racism. I guess you are being “funny” but does your church support Bridget Bardot? Why imply that mine does?

You are not particularly “dangerous”, boschi. You sound like a childish follower with little original thought. Your only danger is being easily misled.

By Donovan

June 3, 2008 4:08 PM | Link to this

Leave it to the Clintons to arrange to steal the show on Obama’s big night. VP? BS. “Apres le deluge, MOI!”

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 4:16 PM | Link to this

Boschi,

Keep trying. There is not a court in the land that would convict Bush of anything illegal. Why not? Because there is NO evidence and you know it. Your opinions are not evidence.

I am certainly glad you are not an attorney, Bosch. Even a lay person knows that you cannot convict a person without evidence. But you would try and manufacture some, wouldn’t you?

Better examine your own hate in case you are going to France. You might not get back.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 4:17 PM | Link to this

HEY EVERYBODY…..

LOOK AT IT THIS WAY

Effective Jan 1, 2009

Dusty, great patriot that she claims to be, will be a supporter of President Obama!

She’ll support the withdrawal from Iraq!

She’ll support the investigations into the criminal activity of the previous administration.

She’ll support tax cuts for the poor and middle class and tax hikes on the top 5%

She’ll support science, recognize global warming and evolution and a woman’s right to dominion over her own body.

All of the new Presidents policies will be her policies too!

AND TRUST ME…..If she ever posts against her professed “type” at that time…..I have tons of her posts to throw in her face!

We gonna have some fun then!

Yassir, Ya’betcha!

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 4:19 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

You claim to be such a good, morally righteous, pious, Christian woman and coupled with your support for Bardot - well I was just making some inferences.

I know I’m not dangerous - but considering you think I should be IMPRISONED for my opinions, you are very dangerous.

Yes, I consider people like you VERY dangerous.

But our country saw the errors of Joe McCarthy, and we’ll make it through the likes of Dustyistic thought (ha! that’s kind of an oxymoron) too.

By Midori

June 3, 2008 4:28 PM | Link to this

watch out Bosch or she’ll gum you to death!!! :)

By O.J.

June 3, 2008 4:36 PM | Link to this

How many of you think that Dusty could’ve resisted the wiles of Benito Mussolini, the Rev. Jim Bakker or Huey Long? Let’s see a show of hands…

By Paul

June 3, 2008 4:37 PM | Link to this

ITN 4:17

“support tax cuts for the poor and middle class and tax hikes on the top 5%”

See, this is what I mean by phrases that sound good, but…

Poor generally don’t pay Federal income tax. Same is true for many, many middle class households (depends upon how you define middle-class, too).

In fact, the Bush tax cuts provided many, many benefits to poor and lower-to-middle class families, such as child care assistance and taking many off the tax rolls entirely. Which is why when the Dems in Congress began chanting to undo the tax cuts they were made aware - it’d affect those same people! Now we see the “clarification” that ummm, no, they meant it only for the “rich.” Can’t give any credit to a Republican for giving more benefits to poor and middle-class households, now, can we?

Oh, just a passing thought - if President Obama gets us in a war, police action, UN operation etc etc etc that a bunch of us decide we don’t care for…

Does that mean you’ll continue to support him, or at the very least, begin to question why he can order ‘kids’ into combat when he ‘never served a day in his life’?

See what I mean about what goes around, comes around?

Bosch and Dusty

Ten minutes in time-out for the both of you. Whew!

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 4:51 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Maybe she should just head butt me in the chest and get it over with.

See my response to you @3:44 - otherwise my above comment would make no sense.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 4:52 PM | Link to this

Paul,

I will always support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

Anyone, PRESIDENTS included, who do not do the same will not find me supportive.

And you?

By Dusty

June 3, 2008 4:53 PM | Link to this

Boschi.4:19

I have never made any claims about my character. I have never supported Bardot. You don’t read well. But that is no surprise. You make up your own “truths” to divert from the real ones. Congrats, though, you did not sound drunk today like most days.

IN THE NEWS@4:17

More fairy tales but at least..not cut’n’paste.

I have no worries about President Obama. I always support the PTA president which is the job best suited for him and the only one he will have.

Please, do keep in mind ALL of MY POSTS. They are the few here that tell the truth and support this country instead of politics. You may refer to them any time. Thank you!!

It is five o’clock and I have to leave. Have fun and keep up the propaganda. Somebody’s got to do it, even if the pay is pitiful.

By @@

June 3, 2008 5:00 PM | Link to this

I thought Bridgette Bardot hated muslims because they eat goats and she loves goats.

GaulleDang! the French are an odd bunch.

RB:

Tis the remnants of my liberalism that provokes me to HOPE Ted Kennedy wants all Americans have that to which he is ENTITLED.

You’re probably right though….he would have us settle for remnants.

By Midori

June 3, 2008 5:01 PM | Link to this

Where you rushing off to, Crusty?

Your daily delousing?

By Bosch

June 3, 2008 5:02 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

“You make up your own “truths” to divert from the real ones”

You hypocrit.

You do that everytime you post or make a comment about someone else’s post that you don’t like.

Even at my drunkest, my thoughts and posts are more coherent than yours.

Later! Off to enjoy more sunshine.

By Paul

June 3, 2008 5:02 PM | Link to this

ITN 4:52

Dang, I’m pleased to hear you say that! And me? But of course!

It’s defining “support and defend” when it’s in the political arena that gets a bit sticky. But for most things - Constitutional rights for Americans, freedom to pretty much say what you want, petition the government for grievances (altho I still have trouble with bribing lobbyists) and such, it’s a no-brainer. Almost.

Bosch

:-)

By N-GA

June 3, 2008 5:03 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Support the President? I thought the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were allowed to lapse…after many prominant Republicans of the time were imprisoned (later to be pardoned by Jefferson). Must be different Republicans on this blog.

By More! More!

June 3, 2008 5:11 PM | Link to this

Folks, Young Republican is punking you…

By Paul

June 3, 2008 5:11 PM | Link to this

N-GA

Things change. For the good, usually.

Just saw this on Drudge:

06-03-2008 16:56 ET *WASHINGTON (AP) _ Obama clinches Democratic nomination, making him first black candidate to lead his party

‘twas a good fight, getalife.

Off to the post -

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 5:29 PM | Link to this

More More,

The only two people that Young Republican seemed to punk were Goldie and ITFS which should tell us all something about how they see the world around them. I bet these two would go stark raving mad if you if you sent a flashlight beam around the ceiling.

By @@

June 3, 2008 5:30 PM | Link to this

(((Former US President Jimmy Carter has endorsed Barack Obama as the Democratic candidate for the White House.)))

I’m not sure ^^^ that’s a good thing, but……WHATEVER!

Rev. Michael Pfleger Removed as Pastor of St. Sabina Catholic Church

I wonder if Father Pfleger preached that same sermon mocking Hillary at his own church? Catholics favor Hillary, so probably not.

(((On Monday, Pfleger went on the defensive again, issuing a statement saying that ——>his tongue slipped when he said in the May 25 sermon that “America is the greatest sin against God.”<—— The activist and priest said he meant to say racism was the greatest sin.)))

Well we definitely know that Pfleger and Obama are “close”, cause they share the frequent “tongue slip”.

By getalife

June 3, 2008 5:38 PM | Link to this

Well, it was a blast posting at the Obama blogs for Clinton.

Those kooks have drank the kool aid and hate the Clintons more than w and his party.

They have that in common with the kooks from the right.

Looks like the Iraqis are stepping up in Iraq so Obama will lose that issue.

Then there is the oil crises and the economy.

It will be close unless Obama makes her VP to get those 18 million that have not drank the kool aid.

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 5:52 PM | Link to this

{{{{By Paul June 3, 2008 5:11 PM 06-03-2008 16:56 ET *WASHINGTON (AP) _ Obama clinches Democratic nomination, making him first black candidate to lead his party}}}}

Paul: So what has happened since yesterday and this morning when that little “news” item first appeared?

Did they count all of the votes from Montana and South Dakota already?

It’s 5:44 p.m. and there still hasn’t been one precinct reporting from either state.

So what did AP base their calling of the race for Obambi on?

Plain and simple, the “news” stories that you have seen posted throughout the day are the wormy lib media blatantly trying to influence the elections.

Think Zogby and President Kerry.

This is a tactic normally reserved for use against the Republican but since the lib hate machine has none of them to target, they played their dirty little tricks on the next best thing………Bruno.

What a great “democracy” we have.

By Justice Marshall

June 3, 2008 5:55 PM | Link to this

ITN, if you’d like some day to say with any credibility that you “will always support [sic] and defend the Constitution of the United States of America,” then you’ll discontinue your practice of republishing libel and accepting the lazy assurance of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution sleezes that you’re not so doing.

By RW-(the original)

June 3, 2008 5:55 PM | Link to this

getalife,

You’re not one to give up that easily. The super delegates aren’t pledged until they get to Denver and cast their vote.

By Political Foreskin

June 3, 2008 5:56 PM | Link to this

I really like the idear of an Obama/Clinton ticket. It’s seems obvious now, but just two weeks ago it seemed obscene. Isn’t that funny about political bedfellows.

This story just wont die:

I just saw on CNN: They just reported that a unicycling bear (escaped from the circus?), was struck and killed by motorists on I-75 in Cobb Country. The bear apparently refused to yeild to larger, faster vehicles and instead insisted on his right of way in the bicycling lane that wasn’t there.

The motorist didn’t stop. Witnesses say the bear appeared disgruntled and beligerent, and answered to the name Dusty.

Gas is expensive, people, and we need to have bicycle lanes on the x-ways. Save the bears.

You know, they say that sometimes it takes a proper tragedy to git things done proper like, and maybe this old bar din’t die for nuthin.

By Young Republican

June 3, 2008 6:02 PM | Link to this

I’m not punking anyone. If there is any kind of proof show it or stfu.

I guess when someone doesn’t conform to the liberal elitist viewpoint they are harassed and talked down to. Nice try.

$100 says the poster @ 5:29 is not the real RW. Am I right More,Moore? (Who by the way has never posted here before.)

Btw, oil is way down to only $124 a barrel, sorry libs!

By @@

June 3, 2008 6:03 PM | Link to this

(((It will be close unless Obama makes her VP to get those 18 million that have not drank the kool aid.)))

Getalife:

I don’t even think Obama accepting Hillary as VP will get many of her supporters on board. It was the party’s nominating rules that have them pished.

I don’t blame ‘em either. It would appear that the dem party controls the people when it should be the other way around. Your party has a serious problem in my opinion.

By @@

June 3, 2008 6:17 PM | Link to this

Normally I don’t pay much attention to hollywooders, but this was too good to pass up:

(((Gwyneth Paltrow: I May Force Myself To Have Another Baby….AND!!!!)))

(((On her support for Barack Obama: “I don’t feel there’s any lip service with [Obama]. I don’t feel like he’s one of those jaded politicos who say one thing and are talking out of both sides of their mouth. I also feel we’ve done such damage to our reputation – and as someone who lives outside America for half the year, I overhear things that I wish I didn’t overhear. A lot of people in the West think that we’re not very sensitive to the rest of the world, and I think that having a president called Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 says that we are part of the world, and we don’t want to make unilateral decisions about the fate of all of us. I just pray to God that he wins.”)))

Good Goofy Grief!

Good luck with your next “bundle of burden” Gwyneth.

By Paul

June 3, 2008 6:19 PM | Link to this

Gotta run - back to the kitchen (a man knows his place) - company coming:

but:

the first Black Presidential candidate.

from a contest with the first serious woman contender.

This is truly a great country.

Now, I must leave and will leave you to ponder the significance that….

both “firsts” were from the Democratic Party.

Pleasant evening, all -

By AJC/DNC Management

June 3, 2008 6:20 PM | Link to this

{{{{By @@ June 3, 2008 6:03 PM It would appear that the dem party controls the people when it should be the other way around.}}}}

Double @: In more ways than you can even imagine.

I guarantee that these premature “Obambi wins” stories from the AP were coordinated through the DNC, see my nickname^^.

They want Bruno to begone and they know they can create the impression that she is by broadcasting their message to all of their dimwit sycophants through the TV Set, which still mystifies many liberals, the TV talking to them is the closest they will ever get to having religion in their lives.

Think “global warming,” the temperatures are falling but that doesn’t matter to the brainwashed because the TV Set told them they would erupt in flames if they didn’t start eating insects or some such nonsense.

What’s so cute is the wonderment of having this propaganda apparatus aimed at the KKKlintons, who hid many years of corrupt, unlawful and hideous behaviors behind it.

What is it that al-Gitmo likes to say?

Karma?

By McCain Alert

June 3, 2008 6:25 PM | Link to this

Compliments to the state of Florida for devising an ‘Amber Alert’ for old people who wander off. The new ‘McCain Alert’ will surely help families track down grandpa should he get away during the normal lapses of judgement that often touch our elderly.

McCain should be as proud of this as his wife Cindy is with the work she has done for other drug addicts.

By @@

June 3, 2008 6:27 PM | Link to this

(((both “firsts” were from the Democratic Party.)))

Uhmmmm Paul! The first African American President - man or woman, will be a candidate from the Republican Party.

THAT CANDIDATE won’t be labeled as a woman or an African American. They’ll just be THE BEST CANDIDATE.

Holed pigeons need not apply.

By Concerned American

June 3, 2008 6:30 PM | Link to this

By @@ June 3, 2008 5:00 PM | Tis the remnants of my liberalism that provokes me to HOPE Ted Kennedy wants all Americans have that to which he is ENTITLED. You’re probably right though….he would have us settle for remnants.

Unhuh..Duke is where you wanna be for brain surgery. Yep, Ted Kennedy is receiving optimum care because he can AFFORD it. Wonder how many Americans who are part of the working poor and can’t afford health insurance, would receive care at Duke? Betcha they’d settle for less than Duke! Betcha many will settle for nothin! Just a thought for caring Americans.

By Justice Marshall

June 3, 2008 6:33 PM | Link to this

No, it’s not “a great country”, Paul, because our oldest — the world’s oldest — party chose two n’er-do-wells for your respective distinctions of First Woman and First Black Person. It was the last, flashy resort of a dying organization, the Democratic Party.

By TW

June 3, 2008 6:45 PM | Link to this

Congrats and Thanks to the GOP for giving us our first black president. Too bad they had to needlessly kill so many of our soldiers in the process.

Gonna be a lot of wide eyed republicans when St. Peter points at the slide…yes, you…

By @@

June 3, 2008 6:49 PM | Link to this

Andy, I’m appalled by the political wrangling that’s taken place in the dem’s nominating process. Money to superdelegates, manipulation by the media. Hell, Obama could have bought Hillary off by paying her campaign debt. It’s as if they were so afraid of losing another election, that they didn’t dare entrust the vote to the populous.

(((Ted Kennedy is receiving optimum care because he can AFFORD it.)))

Damn straight Concerned A! He’s a politician who secures his tax-free money in offshore accounts. He’s one of yours.

There will be no cutting edge anything under nationalized healthcare. We’ll lose some of our best and brightest, the doctors who have left their own countries (nationalized healthcare) due to government restrictions and low pay there for more progressive medicine here.

There are those who are suing the government in the U.K. for the “right” to secure private healthcare. Should any human being have to sue their government for better healthcare?

You libs are a dangerous and illogical (I was gonna say ignorant but decided to be nice) bunch.

By getalife

June 3, 2008 6:49 PM | Link to this

Amazing times with this gas price disaster. Things are going downhill faster than I have ever seen. Change is coming but not from either pathetic nominee.

I feel for you working folks but there is a bright side…..

4 day work weeks and a new green energy investment opportunity.

By getalife

June 3, 2008 6:59 PM | Link to this

RW and @@,

I have never been prouder to be an Independent.

That election was the biggest joke I have seen since w was elected.

Both candidates suk and I think we can all agree to that.

By Justice Marshall

June 3, 2008 6:59 PM | Link to this

How do you suppose the actual getalife might feel about your stupidity in his name?

By Heeso

June 3, 2008 7:01 PM | Link to this

atat, when our first is elected the libs will label him/her an uncle tom or a house n**** like they did Colin Powell, Condi Rice and Clarence Thomas. libs have no respect for quality only a political race.

By @@

June 3, 2008 7:07 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

Let’s just say that I’m less than thrilled, but Obama was very much a part of Hillary’s undoing. It had nothing to do with his qualifications as a candidate. Like I’ve said before…

Obama is no novice at this game of politics. He’s as ruthless as they come, likely worse.

By IN THE NEWS

June 3, 2008 7:09 PM | Link to this

[Barack Obama, Bruce Springsteen, This Land Is Your Land](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytItUIoq2Wc0

God Bless Us Everyone.

By oj

June 4, 2008 12:16 AM | Link to this

Excuse me, but that’s ridiculous. If Obama adds the Clintons to his ticket he’s toast. As the majority of voters nears the polling booths, they’ll vote primarily in revision from the filth and horse$#it that Obama and both the Clintons have heaped upon us.

By miyzutqdr dbjz

September 7, 2008 7:36 AM | Link to this

nzdqjehv bdchofzgm ptbowkr leqgipxoh rculo tgepl lhmsc

By miyzutqdr dbjz

September 7, 2008 7:37 AM | Link to this

nzdqjehv bdchofzgm ptbowkr leqgipxoh rculo tgepl lhmsc